first-tree 0.0.5 → 0.0.6

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (35) hide show
  1. package/README.md +21 -7
  2. package/dist/cli.js +5 -5
  3. package/dist/{help-5-WG9QFm.js → help-DV9-AaFp.js} +1 -1
  4. package/dist/{init-CAq0Uhq6.js → init-BgGH2_yC.js} +41 -7
  5. package/dist/onboarding-D7fGGOMN.js +10 -0
  6. package/dist/onboarding-lASHHmgO.js +2 -0
  7. package/dist/{repo-DkR12VUv.js → repo-Cc5U4DWT.js} +22 -2
  8. package/dist/{installer-UgNasLjl.js → source-integration-CuKjoheT.js} +36 -3
  9. package/dist/{upgrade-DYzuvv1k.js → upgrade-BvA9oKmi.js} +26 -3
  10. package/dist/{verify-C0IUSkMZ.js → verify-G8gNXzDX.js} +5 -1
  11. package/package.json +2 -2
  12. package/skills/first-tree/SKILL.md +21 -5
  13. package/skills/first-tree/agents/openai.yaml +1 -1
  14. package/skills/first-tree/assets/framework/VERSION +1 -1
  15. package/skills/first-tree/engine/init.ts +75 -4
  16. package/skills/first-tree/engine/repo.ts +38 -7
  17. package/skills/first-tree/engine/runtime/asset-loader.ts +6 -0
  18. package/skills/first-tree/engine/runtime/source-integration.ts +80 -0
  19. package/skills/first-tree/engine/upgrade.ts +68 -1
  20. package/skills/first-tree/engine/verify.ts +7 -0
  21. package/skills/first-tree/references/maintainer-architecture.md +4 -0
  22. package/skills/first-tree/references/maintainer-thin-cli.md +3 -0
  23. package/skills/first-tree/references/onboarding.md +28 -3
  24. package/skills/first-tree/references/principles.md +97 -57
  25. package/skills/first-tree/references/source-map.md +1 -0
  26. package/skills/first-tree/references/source-workspace-installation.md +52 -0
  27. package/skills/first-tree/references/upgrade-contract.md +19 -4
  28. package/skills/first-tree/scripts/check-skill-sync.sh +2 -0
  29. package/skills/first-tree/tests/init.test.ts +61 -0
  30. package/skills/first-tree/tests/repo.test.ts +20 -0
  31. package/skills/first-tree/tests/skill-artifacts.test.ts +39 -0
  32. package/skills/first-tree/tests/upgrade.test.ts +38 -2
  33. package/skills/first-tree/tests/verify.test.ts +18 -0
  34. package/dist/onboarding-3zYUeYQb.js +0 -2
  35. package/dist/onboarding-Dd63N-V1.js +0 -10
@@ -20,13 +20,17 @@ import {
20
20
  frameworkVersionCandidates,
21
21
  progressFileCandidates,
22
22
  resolveFirstExistingPath,
23
+ SOURCE_INTEGRATION_FILES,
24
+ SOURCE_INTEGRATION_MARKER,
23
25
  } from "#skill/engine/runtime/asset-loader.js";
24
26
 
25
27
  const FRONTMATTER_RE = /^---\s*\n(.*?)\n---/s;
26
28
  const OWNERS_RE = /^owners:\s*\[([^\]]*)\]/m;
27
29
  const TITLE_RE = /^title:\s*['"]?(.+?)['"]?\s*$/m;
28
30
  const EMPTY_REPO_ENTRY_ALLOWLIST = new Set([
31
+ ".agents",
29
32
  ".DS_Store",
33
+ ".claude",
30
34
  ".editorconfig",
31
35
  ".gitattributes",
32
36
  ".github",
@@ -273,6 +277,23 @@ export class Repo {
273
277
  return text.includes(FRAMEWORK_BEGIN_MARKER) && text.includes(FRAMEWORK_END_MARKER);
274
278
  }
275
279
 
280
+ hasSourceIntegrationFile(relPath: string): boolean {
281
+ return this.fileContains(relPath, SOURCE_INTEGRATION_MARKER);
282
+ }
283
+
284
+ hasSourceWorkspaceIntegration(): boolean {
285
+ return SOURCE_INTEGRATION_FILES.some((file) => this.hasSourceIntegrationFile(file));
286
+ }
287
+
288
+ hasTreeContent(): boolean {
289
+ return (
290
+ this.progressPath() !== null
291
+ || this.hasAgentInstructionsMarkers()
292
+ || this.pathExists("members/NODE.md")
293
+ || this.frontmatter("NODE.md") !== null
294
+ );
295
+ }
296
+
276
297
  hasMembers(): boolean {
277
298
  const membersDir = join(this.root, "members");
278
299
  try {
@@ -338,13 +359,19 @@ export class Repo {
338
359
  return false;
339
360
  }
340
361
 
341
- return (
342
- this.progressPath() !== null
343
- || this.hasFramework()
344
- || this.hasAgentInstructionsMarkers()
345
- || this.pathExists("members/NODE.md")
346
- || this.frontmatter("NODE.md") !== null
347
- );
362
+ if (this.hasTreeContent()) {
363
+ return true;
364
+ }
365
+
366
+ if (this.hasFramework() && this.hasSourceWorkspaceIntegration()) {
367
+ return false;
368
+ }
369
+
370
+ if (this.hasFramework()) {
371
+ return !this.hasLikelySourceRepoSignals();
372
+ }
373
+
374
+ return false;
348
375
  }
349
376
 
350
377
  isLikelyEmptyRepo(): boolean {
@@ -359,6 +386,10 @@ export class Repo {
359
386
  return false;
360
387
  }
361
388
 
389
+ return this.hasLikelySourceRepoSignals();
390
+ }
391
+
392
+ private hasLikelySourceRepoSignals(): boolean {
362
393
  const entries = this.topLevelEntries().filter(
363
394
  (entry) => !EMPTY_REPO_ENTRY_ALLOWLIST.has(entry),
364
395
  );
@@ -21,6 +21,12 @@ export const INSTALLED_PROGRESS = join(SKILL_ROOT, "progress.md");
21
21
  export const AGENT_INSTRUCTIONS_FILE = "AGENTS.md";
22
22
  export const LEGACY_AGENT_INSTRUCTIONS_FILE = "AGENT.md";
23
23
  export const AGENT_INSTRUCTIONS_TEMPLATE = "agents.md.template";
24
+ export const CLAUDE_INSTRUCTIONS_FILE = "CLAUDE.md";
25
+ export const SOURCE_INTEGRATION_MARKER = "FIRST-TREE-SOURCE-INTEGRATION:";
26
+ export const SOURCE_INTEGRATION_FILES = [
27
+ AGENT_INSTRUCTIONS_FILE,
28
+ CLAUDE_INSTRUCTIONS_FILE,
29
+ ] as const;
24
30
 
25
31
  export const CLAUDE_SKILL_AGENTS_DIR = join(CLAUDE_SKILL_ROOT, "agents");
26
32
  export const CLAUDE_SKILL_REFERENCES_DIR = join(CLAUDE_SKILL_ROOT, "references");
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
1
+ import { existsSync, readFileSync, writeFileSync } from "node:fs";
2
+ import { join } from "node:path";
3
+ import {
4
+ SOURCE_INTEGRATION_FILES,
5
+ SOURCE_INTEGRATION_MARKER,
6
+ } from "#skill/engine/runtime/asset-loader.js";
7
+
8
+ export type SourceIntegrationFile = (typeof SOURCE_INTEGRATION_FILES)[number];
9
+
10
+ export interface SourceIntegrationUpdate {
11
+ action: "created" | "updated" | "unchanged";
12
+ file: SourceIntegrationFile;
13
+ }
14
+
15
+ export function buildSourceIntegrationLine(treeRepoName: string): string {
16
+ return (
17
+ `${SOURCE_INTEGRATION_MARKER} Use the installed \`first-tree\` skill here;`
18
+ + ` keep all Context Tree files only in the sibling dedicated`
19
+ + ` \`${treeRepoName}\` repo/submodule and update that tree when decisions`
20
+ + " or constraints change."
21
+ );
22
+ }
23
+
24
+ export function hasSourceIntegrationMarker(text: string | null): boolean {
25
+ if (text === null) {
26
+ return false;
27
+ }
28
+ return text
29
+ .replaceAll("\r\n", "\n")
30
+ .split("\n")
31
+ .some((line) => line.startsWith(SOURCE_INTEGRATION_MARKER));
32
+ }
33
+
34
+ export function upsertSourceIntegrationFiles(
35
+ root: string,
36
+ treeRepoName: string,
37
+ ): SourceIntegrationUpdate[] {
38
+ return SOURCE_INTEGRATION_FILES.map((file) =>
39
+ upsertSourceIntegrationFile(root, file, treeRepoName),
40
+ );
41
+ }
42
+
43
+ function upsertSourceIntegrationFile(
44
+ root: string,
45
+ file: SourceIntegrationFile,
46
+ treeRepoName: string,
47
+ ): SourceIntegrationUpdate {
48
+ const fullPath = join(root, file);
49
+ const exists = existsSync(fullPath);
50
+ const nextLine = buildSourceIntegrationLine(treeRepoName);
51
+ const current = exists ? readFileSync(fullPath, "utf-8") : null;
52
+ const normalized = current?.replaceAll("\r\n", "\n") ?? "";
53
+ const lines = normalized === "" ? [] : normalized.split("\n");
54
+ const markerIndex = lines.findIndex((line) =>
55
+ line.startsWith(SOURCE_INTEGRATION_MARKER),
56
+ );
57
+
58
+ if (markerIndex >= 0) {
59
+ if (lines[markerIndex] === nextLine) {
60
+ return { action: "unchanged", file };
61
+ }
62
+ lines[markerIndex] = nextLine;
63
+ } else {
64
+ if (lines.length > 0 && lines.at(-1) !== "") {
65
+ lines.push("");
66
+ }
67
+ lines.push(nextLine);
68
+ }
69
+
70
+ let nextText = lines.join("\n");
71
+ if (nextText !== "" && !nextText.endsWith("\n")) {
72
+ nextText += "\n";
73
+ }
74
+ writeFileSync(fullPath, nextText);
75
+
76
+ return {
77
+ action: exists ? "updated" : "created",
78
+ file,
79
+ };
80
+ }
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ import { Repo } from "#skill/engine/repo.js";
4
4
  import {
5
5
  AGENT_INSTRUCTIONS_FILE,
6
6
  AGENT_INSTRUCTIONS_TEMPLATE,
7
+ CLAUDE_INSTRUCTIONS_FILE,
7
8
  CLAUDE_SKILL_ROOT,
8
9
  FRAMEWORK_WORKFLOWS_DIR,
9
10
  FRAMEWORK_TEMPLATES_DIR,
@@ -14,6 +15,7 @@ import {
14
15
  LEGACY_REPO_SKILL_ROOT,
15
16
  LEGACY_SKILL_ROOT,
16
17
  SKILL_ROOT,
18
+ SOURCE_INTEGRATION_MARKER,
17
19
  installedSkillRootsDisplay,
18
20
  type FrameworkLayout,
19
21
  } from "#skill/engine/runtime/asset-loader.js";
@@ -21,6 +23,7 @@ import {
21
23
  copyCanonicalSkill,
22
24
  resolveBundledPackageRoot,
23
25
  } from "#skill/engine/runtime/installer.js";
26
+ import { upsertSourceIntegrationFiles } from "#skill/engine/runtime/source-integration.js";
24
27
  import {
25
28
  compareFrameworkVersions,
26
29
  readSourceVersion,
@@ -121,8 +124,10 @@ export interface UpgradeOptions {
121
124
 
122
125
  export function runUpgrade(repo?: Repo, options?: UpgradeOptions): number {
123
126
  const workingRepo = repo ?? new Repo();
127
+ const workspaceOnlyIntegration =
128
+ workingRepo.hasSourceWorkspaceIntegration() && !workingRepo.looksLikeTreeRepo();
124
129
 
125
- if (workingRepo.isLikelySourceRepo() && !workingRepo.looksLikeTreeRepo()) {
130
+ if (workingRepo.isLikelySourceRepo() && !workingRepo.looksLikeTreeRepo() && !workspaceOnlyIntegration) {
126
131
  console.error(
127
132
  "Error: no installed framework skill found here. This looks like a source/workspace repo. Run `context-tree init` to create a dedicated tree repo, or pass `--tree-path` to upgrade an existing tree repo.",
128
133
  );
@@ -178,6 +183,68 @@ export function runUpgrade(repo?: Repo, options?: UpgradeOptions): number {
178
183
  }
179
184
 
180
185
  const missingInstalledRoots = workingRepo.missingInstalledSkillRoots();
186
+ const sourceRepoTreePathHint = `../${workingRepo.repoName()}-context`;
187
+
188
+ if (workspaceOnlyIntegration) {
189
+ if (
190
+ layout === "skill" &&
191
+ missingInstalledRoots.length === 0 &&
192
+ packagedVersion === localVersion
193
+ ) {
194
+ const updates = upsertSourceIntegrationFiles(
195
+ workingRepo.root,
196
+ `${workingRepo.repoName()}-context`,
197
+ );
198
+ const changedFiles = updates
199
+ .filter((update) => update.action !== "unchanged")
200
+ .map((update) => update.file);
201
+ if (changedFiles.length === 0) {
202
+ console.log(
203
+ `Already up to date with the bundled skill (${FRAMEWORK_VERSION} = ${localVersion}).`,
204
+ );
205
+ console.log(
206
+ `This repo only carries source/workspace integration. Upgrade the dedicated tree repo separately with \`context-tree upgrade --tree-path ${sourceRepoTreePathHint}\`.`,
207
+ );
208
+ return 0;
209
+ }
210
+ console.log(
211
+ `Already up to date with the bundled skill (${FRAMEWORK_VERSION} = ${localVersion}).`,
212
+ );
213
+ console.log(
214
+ `Updated the ${SOURCE_INTEGRATION_MARKER} marker lines in ${changedFiles.map((file) => `\`${file}\``).join(" and ")}.`,
215
+ );
216
+ console.log(
217
+ `This repo only carries source/workspace integration. Upgrade the dedicated tree repo separately with \`context-tree upgrade --tree-path ${sourceRepoTreePathHint}\`.`,
218
+ );
219
+ return 0;
220
+ }
221
+
222
+ copyCanonicalSkill(sourceRoot, workingRepo.root);
223
+ const updates = upsertSourceIntegrationFiles(
224
+ workingRepo.root,
225
+ `${workingRepo.repoName()}-context`,
226
+ );
227
+ const changedFiles = updates
228
+ .filter((update) => update.action !== "unchanged")
229
+ .map((update) => update.file);
230
+ console.log(
231
+ `Refreshed ${installedSkillRootsDisplay()} in this source/workspace repo.`,
232
+ );
233
+ if (changedFiles.length > 0) {
234
+ console.log(
235
+ `Updated the ${SOURCE_INTEGRATION_MARKER} marker lines in ${changedFiles.map((file) => `\`${file}\``).join(" and ")}.`,
236
+ );
237
+ } else {
238
+ console.log(
239
+ `The ${SOURCE_INTEGRATION_MARKER} marker lines in ${AGENT_INSTRUCTIONS_FILE} and ${CLAUDE_INSTRUCTIONS_FILE} were already current.`,
240
+ );
241
+ }
242
+ console.log(
243
+ `This repo is not the Context Tree. Upgrade the dedicated tree repo separately with \`context-tree upgrade --tree-path ${sourceRepoTreePathHint}\`.`,
244
+ );
245
+ return 0;
246
+ }
247
+
181
248
  if (
182
249
  layout === "skill" &&
183
250
  missingInstalledRoots.length === 0 &&
@@ -50,6 +50,13 @@ export function runVerify(repo?: Repo, nodeValidator?: NodeValidator): number {
50
50
  const r = repo ?? new Repo();
51
51
  const validate = nodeValidator ?? defaultNodeValidator;
52
52
 
53
+ if (r.hasSourceWorkspaceIntegration() && !r.looksLikeTreeRepo()) {
54
+ console.error(
55
+ `Error: this repo only has the first-tree source/workspace integration installed. Verify the dedicated tree repo instead, for example \`context-tree verify --tree-path ../${r.repoName()}-context\`.`,
56
+ );
57
+ return 1;
58
+ }
59
+
53
60
  if (r.isLikelySourceRepo() && !r.looksLikeTreeRepo()) {
54
61
  console.error(
55
62
  "Error: no installed framework skill found here. This looks like a source/workspace repo. Run `context-tree init` to create a dedicated tree repo, or pass `--tree-path` to verify an existing tree repo.",
@@ -13,6 +13,10 @@ This reference explains how to maintain the `first-tree` source repo itself.
13
13
  This repo is not a user context tree. User decision content lives in the repos
14
14
  that install the framework.
15
15
 
16
+ When a source/workspace repo installs first-tree, that repo should keep only
17
+ the local skill integration and marker lines. Tree content still belongs only
18
+ in a dedicated `*-context` repo.
19
+
16
20
  ## Canonical Layers
17
21
 
18
22
  1. `SKILL.md` defines when to use the skill and the maintainer workflow.
@@ -33,6 +33,9 @@ These root files are shell code, not canonical knowledge stores:
33
33
  - Keep root prose short. It should point to the skill, not duplicate the skill.
34
34
  - Keep command semantics, install layout rules, and maintainer guidance in the
35
35
  skill references.
36
+ - If init/upgrade semantics change for source/workspace repos versus dedicated
37
+ tree repos, update `references/source-workspace-installation.md` and
38
+ `references/upgrade-contract.md` instead of expanding root shell prose.
36
39
  - If the shell gains behavior that is not obviously mechanical, move that
37
40
  behavior or its contract into the skill.
38
41
  - When in doubt, prefer adding a skill reference over expanding root docs.
@@ -65,8 +65,10 @@ Information an agent needs to **decide** on an approach — not to execute it.
65
65
  ### Step 1: Initialize
66
66
 
67
67
  Recommended workflow: run `context-tree init` from your source or workspace repo.
68
- The CLI will create a sibling dedicated tree repo named `<repo>-context` by
69
- default and install the framework there.
68
+ The CLI will install the bundled skill in the current repo, update root
69
+ `AGENTS.md` and `CLAUDE.md` with a `FIRST-TREE-SOURCE-INTEGRATION:` line, and
70
+ create a sibling dedicated tree repo named `<repo>-context` by default. Tree
71
+ files are scaffolded only in the dedicated tree repo.
70
72
 
71
73
  ```bash
72
74
  cd my-org
@@ -90,6 +92,19 @@ Either way, the framework installs into `.agents/skills/first-tree/` and
90
92
  Publishing tip: keep the tree repo in the same GitHub organization as the
91
93
  source repo unless you have a reason not to.
92
94
 
95
+ Hard boundary: do **not** create `NODE.md`, `members/`, or tree-scoped
96
+ `AGENTS.md` in the source/workspace repo. Those files belong only in the
97
+ dedicated `*-context` repo.
98
+
99
+ Default agent workflow after initialization:
100
+
101
+ 1. Create and push the dedicated `*-context` repo in the same GitHub
102
+ organization as the source repo.
103
+ 2. Add the dedicated tree repo back to the source/workspace repo as a `git submodule`.
104
+ 3. Open a PR against the source/workspace repo's default branch for the local
105
+ skill integration plus the new submodule pointer. Do not merge it
106
+ automatically.
107
+
93
108
  ### Step 2: Work Through the Task List
94
109
 
95
110
  Read `.agents/skills/first-tree/progress.md`. It contains a checklist tailored
@@ -123,6 +138,10 @@ This fails if any items in `.agents/skills/first-tree/progress.md` remain
123
138
  unchecked, and runs deterministic checks (valid frontmatter, node structure,
124
139
  member nodes exist).
125
140
 
141
+ Do not run `context-tree verify` in the source/workspace repo itself. That repo
142
+ only carries the installed skill plus the
143
+ `FIRST-TREE-SOURCE-INTEGRATION:` line.
144
+
126
145
  ### Step 4: Design Your Domains
127
146
 
128
147
  Create top-level directories for your organization's primary concerns. Each needs a `NODE.md`:
@@ -158,7 +177,7 @@ The tree doesn't duplicate source code — it captures what connects things and
158
177
 
159
178
  | Command | Description |
160
179
  |---------|-------------|
161
- | `context-tree init` | Create or refresh a dedicated tree repo. By default, running in a source/workspace repo creates a sibling `<repo>-context`; use `--here` to initialize the current repo in place. |
180
+ | `context-tree init` | Install local source/workspace integration and create or refresh a dedicated tree repo. By default, running in a source/workspace repo creates a sibling `<repo>-context`; use `--here` to initialize the current repo in place. |
162
181
  | `context-tree verify` | Check the installed progress file for unchecked items + run deterministic validation. Use `--tree-path` when invoking from another working directory. |
163
182
  | `context-tree upgrade` | Refresh the installed framework skill from the currently running `first-tree` npm package and generate follow-up tasks. Use `--tree-path` when invoking from another working directory. |
164
183
  | `context-tree help onboarding` | Print this onboarding guide. |
@@ -178,6 +197,11 @@ context-tree upgrade
178
197
  `first-tree` npm package, preserves your tree content, and generates follow-up
179
198
  tasks in `.agents/skills/first-tree/progress.md`.
180
199
 
200
+ If you run `context-tree upgrade` in the source/workspace repo, it refreshes
201
+ only the local installed skill plus the `FIRST-TREE-SOURCE-INTEGRATION:` lines.
202
+ Run `context-tree upgrade --tree-path ../my-org-context` to upgrade the
203
+ dedicated tree repo itself.
204
+
181
205
  If your repo still uses the older `skills/first-tree/`,
182
206
  `skills/first-tree-cli-framework/`, or `.context-tree/` layouts,
183
207
  `context-tree upgrade` will migrate it to the current installed layout first.
@@ -191,5 +215,6 @@ install before running `context-tree upgrade`.
191
215
  ## Further Reading
192
216
 
193
217
  - `.agents/skills/first-tree/references/principles.md` — Core principles with detailed examples
218
+ - `.agents/skills/first-tree/references/source-workspace-installation.md` — Source/workspace install contract
194
219
  - `.agents/skills/first-tree/references/ownership-and-naming.md` — How nodes are named and owned
195
220
  - `AGENTS.md` in your tree — The before/during/after workflow for every task
@@ -5,25 +5,26 @@ owners: []
5
5
 
6
6
  # Tree Principles
7
7
 
8
- This document explains the core principles of Context Tree with concrete examples.
8
+ This document explains the four core principles of Context Tree and how to
9
+ apply them in practice. Read them in order: principle 1 defines what the tree
10
+ is for, principle 2 explains how to organize it, principle 3 clarifies access
11
+ and ownership, and principle 4 explains why the structure is tree-shaped and
12
+ Git-native.
9
13
 
10
14
  ---
11
15
 
12
16
  ## 1. Source of truth for decisions, not execution
13
17
 
14
- The tree captures the *what* and *why* strategic choices, cross-domain relationships, constraints. An agent should be able to read the tree and produce a correct approach without consulting source systems.
18
+ The tree captures the *what* and *why* - strategic choices, cross-domain
19
+ relationships, and constraints. An agent should be able to read the tree and
20
+ decide on the right approach before consulting source systems for
21
+ implementation details.
15
22
 
16
- ### Workflow
23
+ ### The decision test
17
24
 
18
- 1. Human says: "Let's add SSO to our product."
19
- 2. Agent reads relevant tree nodes (e.g., `platform/`, `environment/`).
20
- 3. Agent writes a top-level design based on tree context alone.
21
- 4. Human reviews and approves.
22
- 5. Agent explores source systems to build a detailed execution plan.
23
- 6. If source systems reveal something the tree didn't capture — update the tree, revisit with the human, then proceed.
24
- 7. After execution is complete, update the tree to reflect any new decisions.
25
-
26
- This applies to all tasks — features, campaigns, hiring decisions, refactors. Not every task requires a tree update, but the tree is always the starting point, and the question "does the tree need updating?" is always asked at the end.
25
+ If an agent needs this information to *decide* on an approach, it belongs in
26
+ the tree. If the agent only needs it to *execute*, it stays in the source
27
+ system.
27
28
 
28
29
  ### What belongs in the tree
29
30
 
@@ -32,82 +33,121 @@ This applies to all tasks — features, campaigns, hiring decisions, refactors.
32
33
  - "We target academic researchers and AI-native teams because they have the highest tolerance for an agent-centric workflow."
33
34
  - "Q3 campaign focuses on developer communities because enterprise sales cycle is too long for our current stage."
34
35
 
35
- ### What does NOT belong in the tree
36
+ ### What does not belong in the tree
36
37
 
37
- - The function signature of `retrieval_service.search()` read the code.
38
- - The database schema for the `chunk_embeddings` table read the models.
39
- - The current ad copy for a campaign read the campaign tool.
40
- - The current list of API endpoints read the route files.
41
- - The exact interview questions for a role read the hiring doc.
38
+ - The function signature of `retrieval_service.search()` - read the code.
39
+ - The database schema for the `chunk_embeddings` table - read the models.
40
+ - The current ad copy for a campaign - read the campaign tool.
41
+ - The current list of API endpoints - read the route files.
42
+ - The exact interview questions for a role - read the hiring doc.
42
43
 
43
- ### The test
44
+ ### Good node examples
44
45
 
45
- If an agent needs this information to *decide* on an approach, it belongs in the tree. If the agent only needs it to *execute*, it stays in the source system.
46
+ **Cross-domain relationships:** "Auth touches 4 repos: backend (JWT issuance), frontend (Better Auth client), browser extension (OAuth popup + device token), desktop (localhost callback server + JWT storage)." - An agent would need to search across all repos to piece this together.
46
47
 
47
- ### When inconsistency is found
48
+ **Strategic decisions with rationale:** "We use Reciprocal Rank Fusion to combine vector and BM25 results because pure vector search missed keyword-heavy queries and pure BM25 missed semantic matches." - This is nowhere in the source systems.
48
49
 
49
- If an agent reads the tree, makes a decision, then discovers a source system contradicts the tree that's a tree bug. The tree must be corrected before proceeding. This is how the tree stays accurate: every completed task is an opportunity to validate and update it.
50
+ **Domain state summaries:** "The ingestion pipeline has 6 stages: download -> extract -> parse -> chunk -> embed -> store. PDF extraction uses MinerU (cloud). PPTX uses python-pptx locally." - An agent could trace this through 6+ files, or read one node.
50
51
 
51
- ---
52
+ ### Bad node examples
52
53
 
53
- ## 2. Agents are first-class participants
54
+ - Restating what one source file already says clearly.
55
+ - Documenting stable, well-known patterns (e.g., "we use FastAPI for the backend").
56
+ - Listing things that change frequently without decision implications.
54
57
 
55
- The tree is designed to be navigated and updated by agents, not just humans. Domains are organized by concern — what an agent needs to know to act — not by repo, team, or org chart.
58
+ ### Use judgment, not a checklist
56
59
 
57
- ### Why organize by concern?
60
+ Not every task needs a tree update. A pure UI bug fix probably does not. But
61
+ do not assume - a "simple" feature like dark mode becomes a tree-worthy
62
+ decision once it involves auto mode, cross-device persistence, or desktop app
63
+ coordination. Evaluate each task in context.
58
64
 
59
- An agent working on "add SSO support" doesn't think in terms of repos (backend, frontend, extension, desktop) or org structure (engineering vs. product). It needs all auth context — the why, the how, the cross-domain implications — in one place. Organizing by concern puts that context together.
65
+ ### How this works during a task
66
+
67
+ 1. Human says: "Let's add SSO to our product."
68
+ 2. Agent reads relevant tree nodes (e.g., `platform/`, `environment/`).
69
+ 3. Agent writes a top-level design based on tree context alone.
70
+ 4. Human reviews and approves.
71
+ 5. Agent explores source systems to build a detailed execution plan.
72
+ 6. If source systems reveal something the tree did not capture, update the
73
+ tree, revisit with the human, then proceed.
74
+ 7. After execution is complete, update the tree to reflect any new decisions.
60
75
 
61
- ### Domain placement
76
+ This applies to all tasks - features, campaigns, hiring decisions, refactors.
77
+ Not every task requires a tree update, but the tree is always the starting
78
+ point, and the question "does the tree need updating?" is always asked at the
79
+ end.
62
80
 
63
- A feature or decision lives in the domain that owns the primary concern, with soft links to other domains for discoverability:
81
+ ### When the tree and source systems disagree
64
82
 
65
- - "Add SSO support" `platform/` (auth decision), soft links to `environment/` (extension/desktop auth flows)
66
- - "Support PPTX parsing" `knowledge/` (ingestion). Clear, single domain.
67
- - "Q3 developer campaign" `marketing/` (go-to-market), soft link to product domain (feature positioning)
68
- - "Agent remembers user preferences" → `agent/` (memory)
69
- - "Hire a frontend engineer" → `people/hiring/` (role decision), soft link to the team they'd join
83
+ If an agent reads the tree, makes a decision, then discovers a source system
84
+ contradicts the tree, that is a tree bug. The tree must be corrected before
85
+ proceeding. This is how the tree stays accurate: every completed task is an
86
+ opportunity to validate and update it.
70
87
 
71
- ### When to create subdomains
88
+ ---
72
89
 
73
- Start flat. Split when an agent can't scan a NODE.md and quickly determine where to go next. If a domain accumulates enough leaf nodes on a single topic, that topic is ready to become a subdomain.
90
+ ## 2. Agents are first-class participants
74
91
 
75
- ### Whether something belongs in the tree is a judgment call
92
+ The tree is designed to be navigated and updated by agents, not just humans.
93
+ Domains are organized by concern - what an agent needs to know to act - not by
94
+ repo, team, or org chart.
76
95
 
77
- Not every task needs a tree update. A pure UI bug fix probably doesn't. But don't assume — a "simple" feature like dark mode becomes a tree-worthy decision once it involves auto mode, cross-device persistence, or desktop app coordination. Evaluate per task.
96
+ ### Organize by concern
78
97
 
79
- ---
98
+ An agent working on "add SSO support" does not think in terms of repos
99
+ (backend, frontend, extension, desktop) or org structure (engineering vs.
100
+ product). It needs all auth context - the why, the how, and the cross-domain
101
+ implications - in one place. Organizing by concern puts that context together.
80
102
 
81
- ## 3. Transparency by default
103
+ ### Place work in the domain of the primary concern
82
104
 
83
- All information in the tree is readable by everyone humans and agents alike. Writing requires owner approval; reading is open.
105
+ A feature or decision lives in the domain that owns the primary concern, with
106
+ soft links to other domains for discoverability:
84
107
 
85
- This means any agent can build full context by traversing the tree. No domain is hidden. The ownership model controls who can *change* the tree, not who can *read* it.
108
+ - "Add SSO support" -> `platform/` (auth decision), soft links to
109
+ `environment/` (extension/desktop auth flows)
110
+ - "Support PPTX parsing" -> `knowledge/` (ingestion). Clear, single domain.
111
+ - "Q3 developer campaign" -> `marketing/` (go-to-market), soft link to the
112
+ product domain (feature positioning)
113
+ - "Agent remembers user preferences" -> `agent/` (memory)
114
+ - "Hire a frontend engineer" -> `people/hiring/` (role decision), soft link to
115
+ the team they would join
86
116
 
87
- ---
117
+ ### Start flat, then split when needed
88
118
 
89
- ## 4. Git-native tree structure
119
+ Start flat. Split when an agent cannot scan a `NODE.md` and quickly determine
120
+ where to go next. If a domain accumulates enough leaf nodes on a single topic,
121
+ that topic is ready to become a subdomain.
90
122
 
91
- Each node is a file; each domain is a directory. The tree is a Git repository.
123
+ ---
92
124
 
93
- ### Why a tree?
125
+ ## 3. Transparency by default
94
126
 
95
- A tree structure keeps information organized and navigable. Soft links allow cross-references where needed without the complexity of a full graph. An agent can start at any node and traverse up (broader context) or down (more detail) predictably.
127
+ All information in the tree is readable by everyone - humans and agents alike.
128
+ Reading is open; writing requires owner approval.
96
129
 
97
- ### Why Git?
130
+ This means any agent can build full context by traversing the tree. No domain
131
+ is hidden. The ownership model controls who can *change* the tree, not who can
132
+ *read* it.
98
133
 
99
- History, ownership, and review follow the same model software engineering has refined for decades. Every change is a commit, every decision is reviewable in a PR, and the full history of how the tree evolved is preserved.
134
+ ---
100
135
 
101
- ### Examples of good nodes
136
+ ## 4. Git-native tree structure
102
137
 
103
- **Cross-domain relationships:** "Auth touches 4 repos: backend (JWT issuance), frontend (Better Auth client), browser extension (OAuth popup + device token), desktop (localhost callback server + JWT storage)." — An agent would need to search across all repos to piece this together.
138
+ Each node is a file, each domain is a directory, and the tree itself is a Git
139
+ repository. The tree shape gives predictable navigation; Git provides history,
140
+ review, and ownership workflows.
104
141
 
105
- **Strategic decisions with rationale:** "We use Reciprocal Rank Fusion to combine vector and BM25 results because pure vector search missed keyword-heavy queries and pure BM25 missed semantic matches." — This is nowhere in the source systems.
142
+ ### Why a tree
106
143
 
107
- **Domain state summaries:** "The ingestion pipeline has 6 stages: download → extract → parse → chunk → embed → store. PDF extraction uses MinerU (cloud). PPTX uses python-pptx locally." — An agent could trace this through 6+ files, or read one node.
144
+ A tree structure keeps information organized and navigable. Soft links allow
145
+ cross-references where needed without the complexity of a full graph. An agent
146
+ can start at any node and traverse up (broader context) or down (more detail)
147
+ predictably.
108
148
 
109
- ### Examples of bad nodes
149
+ ### Why Git
110
150
 
111
- - Restating what one source file already says clearly.
112
- - Documenting stable, well-known patterns (e.g., "we use FastAPI for the backend").
113
- - Listing things that change frequently without decision implications.
151
+ History, ownership, and review follow the same model software engineering has
152
+ refined for decades. Every change is a commit, every decision is reviewable in
153
+ a PR, and the full history of how the tree evolved is preserved.
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ information should be discoverable from this file.
11
11
  | `SKILL.md` | Trigger conditions, workflow, and validation contract |
12
12
  | `references/about.md` | Product framing for what Context Tree is and is not |
13
13
  | `references/onboarding.md` | The onboarding narrative that `help onboarding` and `init` surface |
14
+ | `references/source-workspace-installation.md` | Contract for source/workspace installs vs dedicated tree repos |
14
15
  | `references/principles.md` | Decision-model reference |
15
16
  | `references/ownership-and-naming.md` | Ownership contract |
16
17
  | `references/upgrade-contract.md` | Installed layout and upgrade semantics |