feed-the-machine 1.6.1 → 1.7.1

package/ftm-researcher/references/output-format.md

@@ -1,203 +1,203 @@
-# Output Format Specification
-
-## Structured JSON Artifact
-
-This is the primary output for skill-to-skill consumption (ftm-brainstorm, ftm-executor, etc.).
-
-### Schema
-
-```json
-{
-  "query": "original research question",
-  "mode": "quick | standard | deep",
-  "timestamp": "ISO-8601",
-  "waves_completed": 1,
-  "agents_dispatched": 7,
-  "council_used": true,
-  "duration_ms": 12345,
-
-  "findings": [
-    {
-      "id": "f-001",
-      "claim": "one-sentence factual claim",
-      "evidence": "2-3 sentence supporting detail",
-      "source_url": "https://...",
-      "source_type": "primary | peer_reviewed | official_docs | code_repo | qa_site | news | blog | forum | codebase",
-      "confidence": 0.85,
-      "credibility_score": 0.78,
-      "trust_level": "high | moderate | low | verify",
-      "agent_role": "web_surveyor | academic_scout | github_miner | competitive_analyst | stack_overflow_digger | codebase_analyst | historical_investigator",
-      "wave": 1,
-      "corroborated": true,
-      "circular_sourcing": false
-    }
-  ],
-
-  "disagreement_map": {
-    "consensus": [
-      {
-        "claim": "...",
-        "supporting_agents": ["web_surveyor", "github_miner", "academic_scout"],
-        "source_count": 5,
-        "source_diversity": 3,
-        "council_verdict": "agreed",
-        "confidence": 0.92
-      }
-    ],
-    "contested": [
-      {
-        "claim_a": "...",
-        "claim_b": "...",
-        "agents_for_a": ["web_surveyor"],
-        "agents_for_b": ["competitive_analyst"],
-        "council_verdict": "contested",
-        "provider_positions": {
-          "claude": "a",
-          "codex": "b",
-          "gemini": "a"
-        },
-        "rank_winner": "a",
-        "judge_rationale": "..."
-      }
-    ],
-    "unique_insights": [
-      {
-        "claim": "...",
-        "agent_role": "historical_investigator",
-        "confidence": 0.6,
-        "note": "Single source — may be high-value insight or hallucination"
-      }
-    ],
-    "refuted": [
-      {
-        "claim": "...",
-        "rejection_reason": "Council unanimously rejected — evidence traces to a single unreliable blog post",
-        "original_agent": "web_surveyor"
-      }
-    ]
-  },
-
-  "metadata": {
-    "sources_total": 34,
-    "sources_high_trust": 12,
-    "sources_moderate_trust": 15,
-    "sources_low_trust": 7,
-    "circular_sourcing_detected": 2,
-    "agent_performance": {
-      "web_surveyor": {"findings": 6, "avg_credibility": 0.65},
-      "academic_scout": {"findings": 4, "avg_credibility": 0.88}
-    }
-  }
-}
-```
-
-### Field Descriptions
-
-| Field | Type | Required | Description |
-|---|---|---|---|
-| query | string | yes | The original research question |
-| mode | enum | yes | quick, standard, or deep |
-| timestamp | ISO-8601 | yes | When the research completed |
-| waves_completed | integer | yes | 1 for quick/standard, 1-2 for deep |
-| agents_dispatched | integer | yes | Total agents spawned across all waves |
-| council_used | boolean | yes | Whether ftm-council was invoked |
-| duration_ms | integer | yes | Total execution time |
-| findings | array | yes | All individual findings |
-| disagreement_map | object | standard/deep | The 4-tier reconciled output |
-| metadata | object | yes | Aggregate statistics |
-
-### Finding ID Convention
-
-Finding IDs follow the pattern `f-NNN` where NNN is a zero-padded sequential number. IDs are stable within a session — if the user drills down on finding #3, it remains f-003 even after new findings are added.
-
----
-
-## Markdown Rendering Template
-
-For user display:
-
-```markdown
-# Research: [query]
-
-**Mode:** [mode] | **Agents:** [count] | **Sources:** [total] | **Duration:** [time]
-
----
-
-## Consensus Findings
-
-[For each consensus claim:]
-**[N].** [claim] ([confidence]% confidence)
-- *Evidence:* [key evidence summary]
-- *Sources:* [source count] across [diversity] types — [top source URL]
-- *Agreed by:* [agent list]
-
----
-
-## Contested — Where Agents Disagreed
-
-[For each contested pair:]
-**[N].** [topic of disagreement]
-
-| Position A | Position B |
-|---|---|
-| [claim_a] | [claim_b] |
-| Supported by: [agents_for_a] | Supported by: [agents_for_b] |
-| [evidence summary] | [evidence summary] |
-
-*Ranking:* [winner] — [judge rationale summary]
-*Council:* [provider positions if available]
-
----
-
-## Unique Insights — Unverified but Interesting
-
-[For each unique insight:]
-- **[claim]** (from [agent_role], [confidence]% confidence)
-  - [note about single-source status]
-
----
-
-## Refuted — What We Ruled Out
-
-[For each refuted claim:]
-- ~~[claim]~~ — [rejection_reason]
-
----
-
-## Source Summary
-
-| Source Type | Count | Avg Credibility |
-|---|---|---|
-| [type] | [count] | [avg score] |
-
----
-
-*What's next? You can:*
-- *"dig deeper on #N"* — spawn targeted agents on a specific finding
-- *"I disagree with #N"* — find counter-evidence
-- *"focus on [angle]"* — reshape and re-run with new weights
-- *"council #N"* — route a specific claim to ftm-council
-- *"compare A vs B"* — spawn comparison agent
-- *"done"* — finalize the research session
-```
-
----
-
-## Conversational Iteration Protocol
-
-After presenting results, the skill enters iteration mode. Each user command triggers a specific action:
-
-| User Command | Action | Updates |
-|---|---|---|
-| "dig deeper on #N" | Spawn 3 targeted agents on finding N's topic | Add new findings, re-render |
-| "I think X is wrong because Y" | Spawn counter-evidence agents + update findings | May move claims between tiers |
-| "focus on [angle]" | Reshape subtopics, re-dispatch with new weights | Full re-run with angle bias |
-| "council #N" | Route specific finding to ftm-council | Update council_verdict for that claim |
-| "more on [agent]'s findings" | Re-dispatch that agent with broader query | Add new findings from that domain |
-| "compare A vs B" | Spawn comparison agent with both findings as context | Add comparison analysis |
-| "done" | Finalize, write blackboard, emit events | Session ends |
-
-Each iteration:
-1. Updates the JSON artifact (new findings get new IDs, tiers may change)
-2. Re-renders the markdown with changes highlighted
-3. Preserves the full conversation history for ftm-pause/resume
+# Output Format Specification
+
+## Structured JSON Artifact
+
+This is the primary output for skill-to-skill consumption (ftm-brainstorm, ftm-executor, etc.).
+
+### Schema
+
+```json
+{
+  "query": "original research question",
+  "mode": "quick | standard | deep",
+  "timestamp": "ISO-8601",
+  "waves_completed": 1,
+  "agents_dispatched": 7,
+  "council_used": true,
+  "duration_ms": 12345,
+
+  "findings": [
+    {
+      "id": "f-001",
+      "claim": "one-sentence factual claim",
+      "evidence": "2-3 sentence supporting detail",
+      "source_url": "https://...",
+      "source_type": "primary | peer_reviewed | official_docs | code_repo | qa_site | news | blog | forum | codebase",
+      "confidence": 0.85,
+      "credibility_score": 0.78,
+      "trust_level": "high | moderate | low | verify",
+      "agent_role": "web_surveyor | academic_scout | github_miner | competitive_analyst | stack_overflow_digger | codebase_analyst | historical_investigator",
+      "wave": 1,
+      "corroborated": true,
+      "circular_sourcing": false
+    }
+  ],
+
+  "disagreement_map": {
+    "consensus": [
+      {
+        "claim": "...",
+        "supporting_agents": ["web_surveyor", "github_miner", "academic_scout"],
+        "source_count": 5,
+        "source_diversity": 3,
+        "council_verdict": "agreed",
+        "confidence": 0.92
+      }
+    ],
+    "contested": [
+      {
+        "claim_a": "...",
+        "claim_b": "...",
+        "agents_for_a": ["web_surveyor"],
+        "agents_for_b": ["competitive_analyst"],
+        "council_verdict": "contested",
+        "provider_positions": {
+          "claude": "a",
+          "codex": "b",
+          "gemini": "a"
+        },
+        "rank_winner": "a",
+        "judge_rationale": "..."
+      }
+    ],
+    "unique_insights": [
+      {
+        "claim": "...",
+        "agent_role": "historical_investigator",
+        "confidence": 0.6,
+        "note": "Single source — may be high-value insight or hallucination"
+      }
+    ],
+    "refuted": [
+      {
+        "claim": "...",
+        "rejection_reason": "Council unanimously rejected — evidence traces to a single unreliable blog post",
+        "original_agent": "web_surveyor"
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+
+  "metadata": {
+    "sources_total": 34,
+    "sources_high_trust": 12,
+    "sources_moderate_trust": 15,
+    "sources_low_trust": 7,
+    "circular_sourcing_detected": 2,
+    "agent_performance": {
+      "web_surveyor": {"findings": 6, "avg_credibility": 0.65},
+      "academic_scout": {"findings": 4, "avg_credibility": 0.88}
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Field Descriptions
+
+| Field | Type | Required | Description |
+|---|---|---|---|
+| query | string | yes | The original research question |
+| mode | enum | yes | quick, standard, or deep |
+| timestamp | ISO-8601 | yes | When the research completed |
+| waves_completed | integer | yes | 1 for quick/standard, 1-2 for deep |
+| agents_dispatched | integer | yes | Total agents spawned across all waves |
+| council_used | boolean | yes | Whether ftm-council was invoked |
+| duration_ms | integer | yes | Total execution time |
+| findings | array | yes | All individual findings |
+| disagreement_map | object | standard/deep | The 4-tier reconciled output |
+| metadata | object | yes | Aggregate statistics |
+
+### Finding ID Convention
+
+Finding IDs follow the pattern `f-NNN` where NNN is a zero-padded sequential number. IDs are stable within a session — if the user drills down on finding #3, it remains f-003 even after new findings are added.
+
+---
+
+## Markdown Rendering Template
+
+For user display:
+
+```markdown
+# Research: [query]
+
+**Mode:** [mode] | **Agents:** [count] | **Sources:** [total] | **Duration:** [time]
+
+---
+
+## Consensus Findings
+
+[For each consensus claim:]
+**[N].** [claim] ([confidence]% confidence)
+- *Evidence:* [key evidence summary]
+- *Sources:* [source count] across [diversity] types — [top source URL]
+- *Agreed by:* [agent list]
+
+---
+
+## Contested — Where Agents Disagreed
+
+[For each contested pair:]
+**[N].** [topic of disagreement]
+
+| Position A | Position B |
+|---|---|
+| [claim_a] | [claim_b] |
+| Supported by: [agents_for_a] | Supported by: [agents_for_b] |
+| [evidence summary] | [evidence summary] |
+
+*Ranking:* [winner] — [judge rationale summary]
+*Council:* [provider positions if available]
+
+---
+
+## Unique Insights — Unverified but Interesting
+
+[For each unique insight:]
+- **[claim]** (from [agent_role], [confidence]% confidence)
+  - [note about single-source status]
+
+---
+
+## Refuted — What We Ruled Out
+
+[For each refuted claim:]
+- ~~[claim]~~ — [rejection_reason]
+
+---
+
+## Source Summary
+
+| Source Type | Count | Avg Credibility |
+|---|---|---|
+| [type] | [count] | [avg score] |
+
+---
+
+*What's next? You can:*
+- *"dig deeper on #N"* — spawn targeted agents on a specific finding
+- *"I disagree with #N"* — find counter-evidence
+- *"focus on [angle]"* — reshape and re-run with new weights
+- *"council #N"* — route a specific claim to ftm-council
+- *"compare A vs B"* — spawn comparison agent
+- *"done"* — finalize the research session
+```
+
+---
+
+## Conversational Iteration Protocol
+
+After presenting results, the skill enters iteration mode. Each user command triggers a specific action:
+
+| User Command | Action | Updates |
+|---|---|---|
+| "dig deeper on #N" | Spawn 3 targeted agents on finding N's topic | Add new findings, re-render |
+| "I think X is wrong because Y" | Spawn counter-evidence agents + update findings | May move claims between tiers |
+| "focus on [angle]" | Reshape subtopics, re-dispatch with new weights | Full re-run with angle bias |
+| "council #N" | Route specific finding to ftm-council | Update council_verdict for that claim |
+| "more on [agent]'s findings" | Re-dispatch that agent with broader query | Add new findings from that domain |
+| "compare A vs B" | Spawn comparison agent with both findings as context | Add comparison analysis |
+| "done" | Finalize, write blackboard, emit events | Session ends |
+
+Each iteration:
+1. Updates the JSON artifact (new findings get new IDs, tiers may change)
+2. Re-renders the markdown with changes highlighted
+3. Preserves the full conversation history for ftm-pause/resume