fdeops 3.23.0 → 3.26.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +60 -153
- package/adapters/LOCAL-LLM.md +14 -102
- package/bin/check.js +3 -3
- package/bin/fde.js +334 -292
- package/bin/install.js +73 -50
- package/bin/lib/context.js +85 -0
- package/bin/lib/fieldbook-client.js +197 -0
- package/bin/lib/font-css.js +115 -0
- package/bin/lib/install-paths.js +53 -0
- package/bin/lib/render.js +165 -207
- package/bin/lib/trust.js +27 -4
- package/bin/lib/value-ledger.js +34 -0
- package/hooks/session-start +18 -84
- package/mcp/fdeops-ingest/package.json +1 -1
- package/package.json +2 -2
- package/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/skills/fde/SKILL.md +10 -6
- package/skills/fde/references/dashboard.md +5 -5
- package/skills/fde/references/debrief.md +10 -4
- package/skills/fde/references/discover.md +5 -1
- package/skills/fde/references/earn-trust.md +1 -1
- package/skills/fde/references/ingest.md +1 -1
- package/skills/fde/references/land.md +6 -6
- package/skills/fde/references/pick-three.md +1 -1
- package/skills/fde/references/plan.md +8 -0
- package/skills/fde/references/poc.md +1 -1
- package/skills/fde/references/readout.md +4 -2
- package/skills/fde/references/review.md +1 -1
- package/skills/fde/references/score-use-cases.md +1 -1
- package/skills/fde/references/ship.md +4 -2
- package/skills/fde/references/switch-clients.md +2 -2
|
@@ -231,6 +231,8 @@ Straight from pilot to standard = a high-profile failure at scale.
|
|
|
231
231
|
|
|
232
232
|
## Method - after
|
|
233
233
|
|
|
234
|
+
Keep implementation, test results, deployment, measured outcome, and customer acceptance separate in the receipt. Record the environment, observation window/sample, source, and remaining gaps. A commit is not a deploy; a staging measurement is not realized production value. When the baseline is missing or incomparable, record the observed result and the measurement next step without claiming an improvement. Record acceptance only for what the named person actually accepted, with a dated source; an engineer's summary remains attributed to that summary.
|
|
235
|
+
|
|
234
236
|
Smoke tests against production. Verify the business metric moved the right way. Then **define the pulse before closing the laptop** - a deploy without a pulse is one you'll hear about only when it breaks:
|
|
235
237
|
|
|
236
238
|
1. **Metric:** the number that says it's working - "p99 on payment endpoint < 800ms", not "errors low."
|
|
@@ -241,7 +243,7 @@ AI components: also define what *normal output* looks like and check a weekly sa
|
|
|
241
243
|
|
|
242
244
|
## Method - scale readiness (pilot proved it, now deploy enterprise-wide)
|
|
243
245
|
|
|
244
|
-
|
|
246
|
+
A successful pilot does not establish readiness for wider use. Check organizational ownership, governance, and infrastructure alongside technical performance before expanding.
|
|
245
247
|
|
|
246
248
|
**The scale-readiness gate (all must be YES before broad rollout):**
|
|
247
249
|
|
|
@@ -277,7 +279,7 @@ Adoption isn't a handoff-stage problem - it starts while you are still writing t
|
|
|
277
279
|
|
|
278
280
|
**At launch:**
|
|
279
281
|
- **Champion network.** Identify 2-3 power users per team who adopt early. Support them intensely - they become your multiplier.
|
|
280
|
-
- **
|
|
282
|
+
- **Adoption targets agreed before launch.** Define the eligible users, expected usage frequency, observation window, baseline, and owner. A weekly workflow needs a different measure from a quarterly one. Investigate misses with users; usage alone does not establish whether onboarding, access, or value is the cause.
|
|
281
283
|
- **The "switching cost" test.** If users can still do it the old way, they will. Adoption requires either: the old way is removed, the new way is dramatically better, or management mandates the switch. Know which lever applies.
|
|
282
284
|
|
|
283
285
|
**Write adoption metrics to `delivery.md`:** active users, frequency, drop-off points, resistance signals. This is the evidence for renewal.
|
|
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
|
|
|
2
2
|
|
|
3
3
|
**Enter when:** the FDE is running 2+ engagements simultaneously, context-switching is causing mistakes or delays, a new customer is being onboarded while existing engagements are active, or the FDE says "I'm losing track."
|
|
4
4
|
|
|
5
|
-
**Read first:** Run `fde status` for the portfolio view. Then per engagement: `context.md` only - load deeper files only for the engagement being worked on.
|
|
5
|
+
**Read first:** Run `fde status --all` for the portfolio view. Then per engagement: `context.md` only - load deeper files only for the engagement being worked on.
|
|
6
6
|
|
|
7
7
|
The solo FDE running three customers simultaneously is the norm, not the exception. Without a system, the third customer gets the scraps of attention left after the other two have their crises. Multi-customer ops is the discipline of giving each customer the experience of being your only customer.
|
|
8
8
|
|
|
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ One wrong customer name in a status update damages both relationships.
|
|
|
98
98
|
|
|
99
99
|
**`context.md`** (per customer) - the 3-line bridge updated at every context switch. The most-written file in multi-customer ops.
|
|
100
100
|
|
|
101
|
-
**`fieldbook.html`** - regenerated by `fde dashboard` (deterministic, zero tokens)
|
|
101
|
+
**`fieldbook.html`** - regenerated by `fde dashboard --all` (deterministic, zero tokens) for the portfolio. Bare `fde dashboard` refreshes the bound `fieldbook-current.html`.
|
|
102
102
|
|
|
103
103
|
## Checkpoint
|
|
104
104
|
|