fazer-lang 2.1.1 → 2.1.2

package/README.md

@@ -187,7 +187,48 @@ This capability makes Fazer the ideal choice for deploying secure, self-containe
 
 ---
 
-## 7. Copyright & Legal
+## 8. Fazer vs The World: A Technical Comparison
+
+Why choose Fazer when you have JavaScript, Python, or Go? Because Fazer is designed for a specific purpose: **High-level Orchestration with Low-level Power**.
+
+### 8.1. Fazer vs JavaScript / Node.js
+
+*   **The Problem with JS**: "Callback Hell" and "Promise Chaining". JavaScript forces you to write code "inside-out" or manage endless `.then()` chains.
+    *   *JS*: `process(parse(read(file)))`
+*   **The Fazer Solution**: Linear data flow. The pipe operator (`→>`) is not just sugar; it's the core of the language.
+    *   *Fazer*: `file →> read() →> parse() →> process()`
+*   **Ecosystem**: To get encryption, HTTP server, and file system operations in Node.js, you often need to install external packages or write boilerplate code using `fs`, `http`, and `crypto` modules. Fazer includes these batteries **natively**. `encText` and `server` are there from line 1.
+
+### 8.2. Fazer vs Python
+
+*   **Distribution**: Sharing a Python script is painful. The user needs Python installed, then `pip install -r requirements.txt`, and version conflicts are common.
+*   **Fazer's Edge**: Fazer compiles to a **single, standalone binary** (EXE for Windows, Bin for Linux). You give the file to the user, they double-click, and it runs. No installation, no dependencies, no friction.
+*   **Performance**: While Python interprets line-by-line, Fazer's lightweight runtime is optimized for rapid I/O and cryptographic operations, making it feel snappier for CLI tools.
+
+### 8.3. Fazer vs Bash / Shell
+
+*   **Cross-Platform Nightmare**: A Bash script written for Linux often fails on Windows (PowerShell/CMD) or macOS due to syntax differences (`ls` vs `dir`, `/` vs `\`).
+*   **Fazer's Universality**: Fazer abstracts the operating system. `ls()`, `rm()`, and `exec()` work identically on Windows, Linux, and macOS. Write once, control any system.
+*   **Safety**: Bash has no real error handling or types. A wrong variable expansion can delete your hard drive (`rm -rf /$VAR`). Fazer provides a structured, safe environment with scoped variables and error handling.
+
+### 8.4. Fazer vs C/C++
+
+*   **Development Speed**: Writing a secure HTTP server with AES encryption in C++ takes days and hundreds of lines of code. In Fazer, it takes **5 lines**.
+*   **Memory Safety**: No manual memory management, no buffer overflows, no segmentation faults. Fazer handles the dirty work so you can focus on the logic.
+
+### Summary Table
+
+| Feature | Fazer | JavaScript | Python | Bash |
+| :--- | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: |
+| **Pipeline Logic** | ✅ Native (`→>`) | ❌ (Plugins needed) | ❌ | ✅ (Pipes `|`) |
+| **Distribution** | ✅ Single Binary | ❌ (Requires Runtime) | ❌ (Complex) | ✅ (Source only) |
+| **Cryptography** | ✅ Built-in AES-256 | ⚠️ Module required | ⚠️ Module required | ❌ External tools |
+| **Cross-Platform** | ✅ 100% | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ |
+| **Setup Time** | ⚡ Instant | 🐢 Slow (npm install) | 🐢 Slow (pip install) | ⚡ Instant |
+
+---
+
+## 9. Copyright & Legal
 
 **Fazer Language** is a proprietary technology developed by **L'EMPRISE**.
 Unauthorized reproduction of the core interpreter logic without attribution is prohibited.

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "fazer-lang",
-  "version": "2.1.1",
+  "version": "2.1.2",
   "description": "Fazer — A unique, high-performance scripting language with powerful pipe operators (→>) and batteries-included stdlib (crypto, http, fs, json).",
   "main": "fazer.js",
   "bin": {