facult 2.8.9 → 2.8.12

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "facult",
-  "version": "2.8.9",
+  "version": "2.8.12",
   "description": "Manage canonical AI capabilities, sync surfaces, and evolution state.",
   "type": "module",
   "license": "MIT",

package/src/builtin-assets.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+// Generated by scripts/generate-builtin-assets.ts. Do not edit by hand.
+
+export const BUILTIN_OPERATING_MODEL_FILES = JSON.parse(
+  '{"AGENTS.global.md":"# Facult Operating Defaults\\n\\nThis machine has a default Facult operating-model layer available.\\n\\nWhen work produces durable friction, weak verification, stale guidance, or a missing skill/tool capability, preserve that signal with `fclt ai writeback ...` when the target and scope are clear. When repeated writebacks or clearly missing capability point at a concrete improvement, use `fclt ai evolve ...` or the `capability-evolution` skill to make a reviewable proposal.\\n\\nFor writeback and evolution, read `@builtin/facult-operating-model/instructions/EVOLUTION.md`.\\nFor learning and writeback defaults, read `@builtin/facult-operating-model/instructions/LEARNING_AND_WRITEBACK.md`.\\nFor deciding whether capability belongs in global or project scope, read `@builtin/facult-operating-model/instructions/PROJECT_CAPABILITY.md`.\\nFor project operating-layer design, read `@builtin/facult-operating-model/instructions/INTEGRATION.md`.\\n\\nBuiltin specialist agents are available for:\\n- writeback curation\\n- evolution planning\\n- scope promotion\\n- integration auditing\\n\\nBuiltin skills are available for:\\n- capability evolution\\n- project operating-layer design\\n","agents/evolution-planner/agent.toml":"name = \\"evolution-planner\\"\\ndescription = \\"Turn repeated writeback into concrete capability proposals.\\"\\n\\ndeveloper_instructions = \\"\\"\\"\\nYou plan capability evolution.\\n\\nPrioritize:\\n- smallest useful change\\n- correct target asset type\\n- correct target scope\\n- evidence that justifies the change\\n- repeated writeback clusters or clearly missing capabilities, not isolated preferences\\n\\nProposal kinds you should consider first:\\n- update_asset\\n- create_asset\\n- extract_snippet\\n- add_skill\\n- promote_asset\\n\\nDefault to project scope when the pattern is repo-local.\\nPromote to global only when reuse is demonstrated and pollution risk is low.\\n\\nReturn concise proposals ordered by expected leverage, including:\\n- proposal kind\\n- target asset\\n- target scope\\n- why this is the smallest durable change\\n\\nDo not escalate to evolution when a single writeback is enough.\\nDo not use evolution as a substitute for executable task tracking when the main need is owner, priority, state, or implementation follow-through.\\n\\"\\"\\"\\n","agents/integration-auditor/agent.toml":"name = \\"integration-auditor\\"\\ndescription = \\"Find where local success can still fail system-wide.\\"\\n\\ndeveloper_instructions = \\"\\"\\"\\nYou audit integration risk.\\n\\nPrioritize:\\n- hidden dependencies\\n- rollout hazards\\n- operational constraints\\n- gaps between local verification and real system behavior\\n\\nReturn concise findings ordered by impact.\\n\\"\\"\\"\\n","agents/scope-promoter/agent.toml":"name = \\"scope-promoter\\"\\ndescription = \\"Decide whether learning belongs at project or global scope.\\"\\n\\ndeveloper_instructions = \\"\\"\\"\\nYou decide scope.\\n\\nPrioritize:\\n- project specificity\\n- cross-project reuse potential\\n- pollution risk from globalizing too early\\n\\nWhen recommending promotion, make the standard path explicit:\\n- keep the source capability in project scope until promotion is approved\\n- create a reviewable global proposal\\n- do not treat promotion as implicit apply\\n\\nReturn concise decisions with rationale.\\n\\"\\"\\"\\n","agents/writeback-curator/agent.toml":"name = \\"writeback-curator\\"\\ndescription = \\"Turn noisy outcomes into high-signal writeback.\\"\\n\\ndeveloper_instructions = \\"\\"\\"\\nYou curate durable writeback.\\n\\nPrioritize:\\n- repeated failures\\n- repeated wins\\n- stale guidance\\n- missing capability edges\\n- tool, skill, MCP, plugin, automation, or instruction friction that repeatedly slows work down\\n\\nFor each recommendation, prefer returning:\\n- suggested writeback kind\\n- best target asset or destination\\n- best scope (`project` or `global`)\\n- the evidence that justifies recording it\\n\\nDo not emit low-signal noise.\\nIf the learning is repo-specific, keep it project-scoped by default.\\nWhen the signal is already strong and the target is clear, prefer recommending direct writeback capture rather than abstract advice.\\nWhen the issue is executable tooling work, recommend task tracking for the fix and writeback only for the reusable operating-model learning.\\n\\"\\"\\"\\n","instructions/EVOLUTION.md":"---\\ndescription: Turn repeated signal into concrete capability changes.\\ntags: [facult, evolution, writeback]\\n---\\n\\n# Evolution\\n\\nUse writeback and evolution to improve the AI operating layer itself.\\n\\nEvolution is the synthesis and change side of the feedback loop. It turns accumulated writebacks, repeated tool friction, stale canonical assets, or clearly missing capability into small reviewable changes to instructions, skills, snippets, agents, or other markdown canonical assets.\\n\\n## When To Record Writeback\\n\\nRecord writeback when one of these is true:\\n\\n- the same failure repeats\\n- the same success pattern repeats\\n- guidance is stale or missing\\n- a prompt or loop has to be restated often\\n- a project-specific pattern looks reusable\\n\\nDo not record low-signal noise:\\n\\n- one-off annoyance with no reuse value\\n- generic \\"could be better\\" commentary\\n- duplicate observations with no new evidence\\n\\nThe intended default is that agents record strong writebacks themselves when the signal is clear enough, rather than only recommending that a user do it manually later.\\n\\nDo not wait for a weekly review to preserve high-signal evidence. Do wait for repeated evidence or a clearly missing capability before drafting a proposal.\\n\\n## Scope\\n\\nChoose `project` scope when the learning depends on:\\n\\n- repo architecture\\n- team workflow\\n- project tooling\\n- local testing or verification behavior\\n\\nChoose `global` scope when the learning is reusable across projects.\\n\\nPromote from project to global only after repeated reuse or strong evidence.\\n\\n## Writeback Kinds\\n\\nCommon kinds:\\n\\n- `weak_verification`\\n- `false_positive`\\n- `missing_context`\\n- `reusable_pattern`\\n- `capability_gap`\\n- `bad_default`\\n\\nEvery good writeback should try to include:\\n\\n- a concrete summary\\n- the best target asset if known\\n- the right scope\\n- domain or tags when useful\\n\\n## Operator Flow\\n\\nTypical workflow:\\n\\n```bash\\nfclt ai writeback add --kind weak_verification --summary \\"Checks were too shallow\\" --asset instruction:VERIFICATION\\nfclt ai writeback group --by asset\\nfclt ai writeback summarize --by domain\\nfclt ai evolve propose\\nfclt ai evolve draft EV-00001\\nfclt ai evolve accept EV-00001\\nfclt ai evolve apply EV-00001\\n```\\n\\nUse `fclt ai evolve draft <id> --append \\"...\\"` to revise a draft while preserving draft history.\\n\\nReview surfaces:\\n\\n- `fclt status --json` for queue/proposal paths, counts, and active scope\\n- `fclt ai writeback list|show|group|summarize` for raw and clustered signal\\n- `fclt ai evolve list|show|review` for proposal state without applying changes\\n- `fclt templates init automation learning-review` for recurring capture/review\\n- `fclt templates init automation evolution-review` for recurring proposal review\\n- `fclt templates init automation tool-call-audit` for repeated tool-friction review\\n\\nEvolution proposal metadata, markdown drafts, patch artifacts, writeback queues,\\nand journals are runtime state. `fclt` stores them in machine-local Facult state;\\ncanonical assets in `~/.ai` or `<repo>/.ai` should only change when a proposal is\\napplied.\\n\\n## Default Agent Behavior\\n\\nUse the smallest action that fits the signal:\\n\\n1. record one strong writeback when there is a clear durable learning\\n2. use `writeback-curator` when the target, kind, or scope is ambiguous\\n3. use `capability-evolution` or `evolution-planner` when repeated signal should become a proposal\\n4. do not draft or apply proposals just because a writeback exists; require repeated evidence or a clearly missing capability\\n\\nAvoid creating writeback/evolution noise for one-off nits, vague preferences, or speculative ideas without evidence.\\n\\nWhen the friction is executable product/tooling work that needs ownership,\\npriority, state, or implementation follow-through, create or update a real task\\nsystem item instead of forcing it into capability evolution. Use evolution for\\nthe reusable operating-layer change.\\n\\n## Proposal Kinds\\n\\nCurrent supported proposal kinds:\\n\\n- `update_asset`\\n- `create_asset`\\n- `extract_snippet`\\n- `add_skill`\\n- `promote_asset`\\n\\nUse the smallest durable change that fits the evidence.\\n\\n## Review And Apply Rules\\n\\n- draft before apply\\n- accept before apply\\n- prefer the smallest safe change\\n- keep reviewable evidence tied to source writebacks\\n- do not globalize project behavior too early\\n- do not apply high-risk global instruction, skill, plugin, or non-COS changes without explicit review/approval\\n\\nApply is for markdown canonical assets only. If the target is wrong, revise the proposal rather than forcing it through.\\n","instructions/INTEGRATION.md":"---\\ndescription: Detect where local success can still fail at integration boundaries.\\ntags: [facult, integration, verification]\\n---\\n\\n# Integration\\n\\nDistinguish local correctness from system correctness. Check hidden dependencies, rollout order, and operational constraints before calling work done.\\n","instructions/LEARNING_AND_WRITEBACK.md":"---\\ndescription: Preserve durable signal and record writeback when the operating layer should learn.\\ntags: [facult, learning, writeback]\\n---\\n\\n# Learning And Writeback\\n\\nUse this when work produces a durable decision, failure, success pattern, or missing guardrail that should outlive the current task.\\n\\nThis is the capture side of the feedback loop. The goal is to let normal agent work produce reusable signal without requiring a human to manually restate every friction point later.\\n\\n## Default Behavior\\n\\nThe normal path should be agent-driven.\\n\\nIf you can clearly answer:\\n\\n- what was learned\\n- why it matters\\n- where it should land\\n- whether it belongs in `project` or `global`\\n\\nthen record the writeback instead of only suggesting that someone should do it later.\\n\\nUse:\\n\\n```bash\\nfclt ai writeback add --kind <kind> --summary \\"<summary>\\" --asset <asset-selector>\\n```\\n\\nThe writeback queue is runtime state, not canonical source. `fclt` stores it in\\nmachine-local Facult state so sandboxed agents can record durable friction\\nwithout mutating `~/.ai` or a repo-local `.ai` unless an evolution proposal is\\nlater reviewed and applied.\\n\\nProject-scoped writebacks should usually be recorded from the repo that produced\\nthe evidence. Global writebacks should be reserved for shared doctrine, shared\\nskills, shared agents, tool behavior, or cross-project capability gaps.\\n\\n## Record Writeback When\\n\\n- the same failure or weak loop appears again\\n- a reusable success pattern shows up\\n- guidance is clearly stale or missing\\n- a repo-local behavior probably belongs in project capability\\n- a cross-project behavior probably belongs in global capability\\n- a skill, tool, MCP, plugin, automation, or instruction gap repeatedly slows work down\\n- an agent has to restate the same workaround, verification rule, or review rule\\n\\n## Do Not Record Writeback For\\n\\n- one-off annoyance with no durable value\\n- weak commentary with no target\\n- speculative ideas without evidence\\n- duplicate noise with no new signal\\n\\n## Follow Through\\n\\n- prefer one strong writeback over many weak ones\\n- mention the writeback id when summarizing what changed\\n- escalate to `capability-evolution` or `fclt ai evolve ...` only when the signal is repeated or clearly points at a durable capability change\\n- use `fclt ai writeback group --by asset` or `fclt ai writeback summarize --by domain` to review accumulated signal before proposing broad changes\\n- use scheduled `learning-review`, `evolution-review`, or `tool-call-audit` automations when the signal should be reviewed in the background\\n","instructions/PROJECT_CAPABILITY.md":"---\\ndescription: Decide what belongs in repo-local .ai versus the global store.\\ntags: [facult, project, scope]\\n---\\n\\n# Project Capability\\n\\nPrefer project scope when the guidance depends on repo architecture, team workflow, or colocated tooling. Promote to global only after repeated cross-project reuse.\\n\\n## Project First\\n\\nDefault to `<repo>/.ai` when the capability is about:\\n\\n- local architecture\\n- repo-specific testing or verification\\n- team conventions\\n- project tools and workflows\\n\\n## Promote Carefully\\n\\nPromote to `~/.ai` only when:\\n\\n- the same pattern succeeds in more than one repo\\n- the capability is not coupled to local architecture\\n- the global version will not create noise for unrelated projects\\n\\nUse:\\n\\n```bash\\nfclt ai evolve promote EV-00001 --to global --project\\n```\\n\\nThat creates a new global proposal for review. It does not auto-apply the promotion.\\n","skills/capability-evolution/SKILL.md":"---\\ndescription: Convert repeated writeback into concrete fclt capability proposals.\\ntags: [facult, evolution, writeback]\\n---\\n\\n# capability-evolution\\n\\n## When To Use\\nUse this skill when the same missing guidance, weak loop, or recurring win appears often enough that the AI system itself should probably change.\\n\\nDo not wait for a human operator by default if the signal is already clear and the environment permits local AI runtime state to be updated.\\n\\nUse writeback first when the signal is useful but not yet repeated. Use evolution when accumulated writebacks, repeated tool friction, or a clearly missing capability point at a specific target asset or new capability.\\n\\n## Scope Decision\\n\\nChoose `project` when the behavior depends on repo-local architecture or workflow.\\n\\nChoose `global` when the behavior is broadly reusable.\\n\\nIf unsure, start at project scope and promote later with evidence.\\n\\n## Working Flow\\n\\n1. record the strongest writeback\\n2. group or summarize repeated signal\\n3. choose the smallest valid proposal kind\\n4. draft the proposal\\n5. accept only after the target and scope are correct\\n6. apply only when the markdown target is the intended canonical asset\\n\\nUse:\\n\\n```bash\\nfclt ai writeback add ...\\nfclt ai writeback group --by asset\\nfclt ai writeback summarize --by domain\\nfclt ai evolve propose\\nfclt ai evolve draft EV-00001\\nfclt ai evolve draft EV-00001 --append \\"tighten the rule with a concrete verification step\\"\\nfclt ai evolve accept EV-00001\\nfclt ai evolve apply EV-00001\\n```\\n\\nFor background review loops, use:\\n\\n```bash\\nfclt templates init automation learning-review\\nfclt templates init automation evolution-review\\nfclt templates init automation tool-call-audit\\n```\\n\\nIf there is not yet enough repeated signal for evolution, record the writeback and stop there.\\n\\n## Proposal Kind Selection\\n\\n- `update_asset` for tightening existing guidance\\n- `create_asset` for missing instructions or docs\\n- `extract_snippet` for reusable partial guidance\\n- `add_skill` for reusable workflow instruction\\n- `promote_asset` for project-to-global promotion\\n\\nUse task tracking instead of evolution when the main work is an executable tool or product fix that needs an owner, priority, state, or delivery plan. Use evolution for the reusable instruction, skill, or operating-model change that should survive that fix.\\n\\n## Output Contract\\n- repeated signal\\n- proposed asset change\\n- target scope\\n- evidence\\n- smallest useful next step\\n","skills/project-operating-layer-design/SKILL.md":"---\\ndescription: Design or improve a repo-local .ai operating layer.\\ntags: [facult, project, design]\\n---\\n\\n# project-operating-layer-design\\n\\n## When To Use\\nUse this skill when a project needs its own `.ai/` structure, repo-specific instructions, or local bootstrap guidance.\\n\\n## Output Contract\\n- recommended `.ai/` layout\\n- what stays project-local\\n- what stays global\\n- what should remain generated runtime output only\\n"}'
+) as Record<string, string>;

package/src/builtin.ts

@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
+import { existsSync, mkdirSync, readFileSync, writeFileSync } from "node:fs";
+import { tmpdir } from "node:os";
 import { dirname, join } from "node:path";
 import { fileURLToPath } from "node:url";
+import { BUILTIN_OPERATING_MODEL_FILES } from "./builtin-assets";
 import { projectRootFromAiRoot } from "./paths";
 
 function isPlainObject(value: unknown): value is Record<string, unknown> {
@@ -10,7 +13,35 @@ export function facultBuiltinPackRoot(
   packName = "facult-operating-model"
 ): string {
   const here = dirname(fileURLToPath(import.meta.url));
-  return join(here, "..", "assets", "packs", packName);
+  const sourceRoot = join(here, "..", "assets", "packs", packName);
+  if (existsSync(sourceRoot)) {
+    return sourceRoot;
+  }
+  if (packName === "facult-operating-model") {
+    return materializeBuiltinOperatingModelPack();
+  }
+  return sourceRoot;
+}
+
+function materializeBuiltinOperatingModelPack(): string {
+  const root = join(tmpdir(), "fclt-builtin-packs", "facult-operating-model");
+  for (const [relativePath, content] of Object.entries(
+    BUILTIN_OPERATING_MODEL_FILES
+  )) {
+    const pathValue = join(root, relativePath);
+    mkdirSync(dirname(pathValue), { recursive: true });
+    if (existsSync(pathValue)) {
+      try {
+        if (readFileSync(pathValue, "utf8") === content) {
+          continue;
+        }
+      } catch {
+        // Rewrite unreadable materialized assets below.
+      }
+    }
+    writeFileSync(pathValue, content, "utf8");
+  }
+  return root;
 }
 
 async function readTomlObject(

package/src/index-builder.ts

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 import { mkdir, readdir } from "node:fs/promises";
 import { basename, dirname, isAbsolute, join, relative } from "node:path";
-import { fileURLToPath } from "node:url";
 import { getAdapter } from "./adapters";
+import { facultBuiltinPackRoot } from "./builtin";
 import { parseCliContextArgs, resolveCliContextRoot } from "./cli-context";
 import {
   type AssetScope,
@@ -524,14 +524,9 @@ async function readJsonSafe(p: string): Promise<unknown> {
   return JSON.parse(txt);
 }
 
-function builtinAssetsRoot(): string {
-  const here = dirname(fileURLToPath(import.meta.url));
-  return join(here, "..", "assets", "packs", "facult-operating-model");
-}
-
 function canonicalRefForPath(
   source: IndexedSource,
-  category:
+  _category:
     | "skills"
     | "agents"
     | "automations"
@@ -553,7 +548,7 @@ function canonicalRefForPath(
     return `@project/${rel}`;
   }
   if (source.sourceKind === "builtin") {
-    return `@builtin/facult-operating-model/${category}/${rel}`;
+    return `@builtin/facult-operating-model/${rel}`;
   }
   return undefined;
 }
@@ -1628,7 +1623,7 @@ export async function buildIndex(opts?: {
 
   const globalRoot = facultRootDir(homeDir);
   const sources: IndexedSource[] = [];
-  const builtinRoot = builtinAssetsRoot();
+  const builtinRoot = facultBuiltinPackRoot();
   try {
     const st = await Bun.file(builtinRoot).stat();
     if (st.isDirectory()) {