eyeling 1.6.12 → 1.6.14

package/examples/output/crypto-builtins-tests.n3

@@ -1,66 +1,6 @@
 @prefix : <https://eyereasoner.github.io/ns#> .
 
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Proof for derived triple:
-#   :ok_crypto_sha_1 a :Pass .
-# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
-#   "hello world" crypto:sha "2aae6c35c94fcfb415dbe95f408b9ce91ee846ed" .
-# via the schematic forward rule:
-#   {
-#     "hello world" crypto:sha "2aae6c35c94fcfb415dbe95f408b9ce91ee846ed" .
-#   } => {
-#     :ok_crypto_sha_1 a :Pass .
-#   } .
-# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 :ok_crypto_sha_1 a :Pass .
-
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Proof for derived triple:
-#   :ok_crypto_md5_1 a :Pass .
-# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
-#   "hello world" crypto:md5 "5eb63bbbe01eeed093cb22bb8f5acdc3" .
-# via the schematic forward rule:
-#   {
-#     "hello world" crypto:md5 "5eb63bbbe01eeed093cb22bb8f5acdc3" .
-#   } => {
-#     :ok_crypto_md5_1 a :Pass .
-#   } .
-# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 :ok_crypto_md5_1 a :Pass .
-
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Proof for derived triple:
-#   :ok_crypto_sha256_1 a :Pass .
-# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
-#   "hello world" crypto:sha256 "b94d27b9934d3e08a52e52d7da7dabfac484efe37a5380ee9088f7ace2efcde9" .
-# via the schematic forward rule:
-#   {
-#     "hello world" crypto:sha256 "b94d27b9934d3e08a52e52d7da7dabfac484efe37a5380ee9088f7ace2efcde9" .
-#   } => {
-#     :ok_crypto_sha256_1 a :Pass .
-#   } .
-# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 :ok_crypto_sha256_1 a :Pass .
-
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Proof for derived triple:
-#   :ok_crypto_sha512_1 a :Pass .
-# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
-#   "hello world" crypto:sha512 "309ecc489c12d6eb4cc40f50c902f2b4d0ed77ee511a7c7a9bcd3ca86d4cd86f989dd35bc5ff499670da34255b45b0cfd830e81f605dcf7dc5542e93ae9cd76f" .
-# via the schematic forward rule:
-#   {
-#     "hello world" crypto:sha512 "309ecc489c12d6eb4cc40f50c902f2b4d0ed77ee511a7c7a9bcd3ca86d4cd86f989dd35bc5ff499670da34255b45b0cfd830e81f605dcf7dc5542e93ae9cd76f" .
-#   } => {
-#     :ok_crypto_sha512_1 a :Pass .
-#   } .
-# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 :ok_crypto_sha512_1 a :Pass .
-

package/examples/output/deep-taxonomy-10.n3

@@ -1,636 +1,34 @@
 @prefix : <http://eulersharp.sourceforge.net/2009/12dtb/test#> .
 
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Proof for derived triple:
-#   :ind a :N1 .
-# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
-#   :ind a :N0 .
-# via the schematic forward rule:
-#   {
-#     ?X a :N0 .
-#   } => {
-#     ?X a :N1 .
-#     ?X a :I1 .
-#     ?X a :J1 .
-#   } .
-# with substitution (on rule variables):
-#   ?X = :ind
-# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 :ind a :N1 .
-
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Proof for derived triple:
-#   :ind a :I1 .
-# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
-#   :ind a :N0 .
-# via the schematic forward rule:
-#   {
-#     ?X a :N0 .
-#   } => {
-#     ?X a :N1 .
-#     ?X a :I1 .
-#     ?X a :J1 .
-#   } .
-# with substitution (on rule variables):
-#   ?X = :ind
-# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 :ind a :I1 .
-
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Proof for derived triple:
-#   :ind a :J1 .
-# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
-#   :ind a :N0 .
-# via the schematic forward rule:
-#   {
-#     ?X a :N0 .
-#   } => {
-#     ?X a :N1 .
-#     ?X a :I1 .
-#     ?X a :J1 .
-#   } .
-# with substitution (on rule variables):
-#   ?X = :ind
-# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 :ind a :J1 .
-
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Proof for derived triple:
-#   :ind a :N2 .
-# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
-#   :ind a :N1 .
-# via the schematic forward rule:
-#   {
-#     ?X a :N1 .
-#   } => {
-#     ?X a :N2 .
-#     ?X a :I2 .
-#     ?X a :J2 .
-#   } .
-# with substitution (on rule variables):
-#   ?X = :ind
-# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 :ind a :N2 .
-
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Proof for derived triple:
-#   :ind a :I2 .
-# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
-#   :ind a :N1 .
-# via the schematic forward rule:
-#   {
-#     ?X a :N1 .
-#   } => {
-#     ?X a :N2 .
-#     ?X a :I2 .
-#     ?X a :J2 .
-#   } .
-# with substitution (on rule variables):
-#   ?X = :ind
-# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 :ind a :I2 .
-
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Proof for derived triple:
-#   :ind a :J2 .
-# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
-#   :ind a :N1 .
-# via the schematic forward rule:
-#   {
-#     ?X a :N1 .
-#   } => {
-#     ?X a :N2 .
-#     ?X a :I2 .
-#     ?X a :J2 .
-#   } .
-# with substitution (on rule variables):
-#   ?X = :ind
-# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 :ind a :J2 .
-
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Proof for derived triple:
-#   :ind a :N3 .
-# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
-#   :ind a :N2 .
-# via the schematic forward rule:
-#   {
-#     ?X a :N2 .
-#   } => {
-#     ?X a :N3 .
-#     ?X a :I3 .
-#     ?X a :J3 .
-#   } .
-# with substitution (on rule variables):
-#   ?X = :ind
-# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 :ind a :N3 .
-
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Proof for derived triple:
-#   :ind a :I3 .
-# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
-#   :ind a :N2 .
-# via the schematic forward rule:
-#   {
-#     ?X a :N2 .
-#   } => {
-#     ?X a :N3 .
-#     ?X a :I3 .
-#     ?X a :J3 .
-#   } .
-# with substitution (on rule variables):
-#   ?X = :ind
-# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 :ind a :I3 .
-
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Proof for derived triple:
-#   :ind a :J3 .
-# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
-#   :ind a :N2 .
-# via the schematic forward rule:
-#   {
-#     ?X a :N2 .
-#   } => {
-#     ?X a :N3 .
-#     ?X a :I3 .
-#     ?X a :J3 .
-#   } .
-# with substitution (on rule variables):
-#   ?X = :ind
-# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 :ind a :J3 .
-
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Proof for derived triple:
-#   :ind a :N4 .
-# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
-#   :ind a :N3 .
-# via the schematic forward rule:
-#   {
-#     ?X a :N3 .
-#   } => {
-#     ?X a :N4 .
-#     ?X a :I4 .
-#     ?X a :J4 .
-#   } .
-# with substitution (on rule variables):
-#   ?X = :ind
-# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 :ind a :N4 .
-
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Proof for derived triple:
-#   :ind a :I4 .
-# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
-#   :ind a :N3 .
-# via the schematic forward rule:
-#   {
-#     ?X a :N3 .
-#   } => {
-#     ?X a :N4 .
-#     ?X a :I4 .
-#     ?X a :J4 .
-#   } .
-# with substitution (on rule variables):
-#   ?X = :ind
-# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 :ind a :I4 .
-
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Proof for derived triple:
-#   :ind a :J4 .
-# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
-#   :ind a :N3 .
-# via the schematic forward rule:
-#   {
-#     ?X a :N3 .
-#   } => {
-#     ?X a :N4 .
-#     ?X a :I4 .
-#     ?X a :J4 .
-#   } .
-# with substitution (on rule variables):
-#   ?X = :ind
-# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 :ind a :J4 .
-
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Proof for derived triple:
-#   :ind a :N5 .
-# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
-#   :ind a :N4 .
-# via the schematic forward rule:
-#   {
-#     ?X a :N4 .
-#   } => {
-#     ?X a :N5 .
-#     ?X a :I5 .
-#     ?X a :J5 .
-#   } .
-# with substitution (on rule variables):
-#   ?X = :ind
-# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 :ind a :N5 .
-
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Proof for derived triple:
-#   :ind a :I5 .
-# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
-#   :ind a :N4 .
-# via the schematic forward rule:
-#   {
-#     ?X a :N4 .
-#   } => {
-#     ?X a :N5 .
-#     ?X a :I5 .
-#     ?X a :J5 .
-#   } .
-# with substitution (on rule variables):
-#   ?X = :ind
-# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 :ind a :I5 .
-
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Proof for derived triple:
-#   :ind a :J5 .
-# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
-#   :ind a :N4 .
-# via the schematic forward rule:
-#   {
-#     ?X a :N4 .
-#   } => {
-#     ?X a :N5 .
-#     ?X a :I5 .
-#     ?X a :J5 .
-#   } .
-# with substitution (on rule variables):
-#   ?X = :ind
-# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 :ind a :J5 .
-
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Proof for derived triple:
-#   :ind a :N6 .
-# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
-#   :ind a :N5 .
-# via the schematic forward rule:
-#   {
-#     ?X a :N5 .
-#   } => {
-#     ?X a :N6 .
-#     ?X a :I6 .
-#     ?X a :J6 .
-#   } .
-# with substitution (on rule variables):
-#   ?X = :ind
-# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 :ind a :N6 .
-
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Proof for derived triple:
-#   :ind a :I6 .
-# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
-#   :ind a :N5 .
-# via the schematic forward rule:
-#   {
-#     ?X a :N5 .
-#   } => {
-#     ?X a :N6 .
-#     ?X a :I6 .
-#     ?X a :J6 .
-#   } .
-# with substitution (on rule variables):
-#   ?X = :ind
-# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 :ind a :I6 .
-
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Proof for derived triple:
-#   :ind a :J6 .
-# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
-#   :ind a :N5 .
-# via the schematic forward rule:
-#   {
-#     ?X a :N5 .
-#   } => {
-#     ?X a :N6 .
-#     ?X a :I6 .
-#     ?X a :J6 .
-#   } .
-# with substitution (on rule variables):
-#   ?X = :ind
-# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 :ind a :J6 .
-
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Proof for derived triple:
-#   :ind a :N7 .
-# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
-#   :ind a :N6 .
-# via the schematic forward rule:
-#   {
-#     ?X a :N6 .
-#   } => {
-#     ?X a :N7 .
-#     ?X a :I7 .
-#     ?X a :J7 .
-#   } .
-# with substitution (on rule variables):
-#   ?X = :ind
-# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 :ind a :N7 .
-
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Proof for derived triple:
-#   :ind a :I7 .
-# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
-#   :ind a :N6 .
-# via the schematic forward rule:
-#   {
-#     ?X a :N6 .
-#   } => {
-#     ?X a :N7 .
-#     ?X a :I7 .
-#     ?X a :J7 .
-#   } .
-# with substitution (on rule variables):
-#   ?X = :ind
-# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 :ind a :I7 .
-
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Proof for derived triple:
-#   :ind a :J7 .
-# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
-#   :ind a :N6 .
-# via the schematic forward rule:
-#   {
-#     ?X a :N6 .
-#   } => {
-#     ?X a :N7 .
-#     ?X a :I7 .
-#     ?X a :J7 .
-#   } .
-# with substitution (on rule variables):
-#   ?X = :ind
-# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 :ind a :J7 .
-
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Proof for derived triple:
-#   :ind a :N8 .
-# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
-#   :ind a :N7 .
-# via the schematic forward rule:
-#   {
-#     ?X a :N7 .
-#   } => {
-#     ?X a :N8 .
-#     ?X a :I8 .
-#     ?X a :J8 .
-#   } .
-# with substitution (on rule variables):
-#   ?X = :ind
-# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 :ind a :N8 .
-
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Proof for derived triple:
-#   :ind a :I8 .
-# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
-#   :ind a :N7 .
-# via the schematic forward rule:
-#   {
-#     ?X a :N7 .
-#   } => {
-#     ?X a :N8 .
-#     ?X a :I8 .
-#     ?X a :J8 .
-#   } .
-# with substitution (on rule variables):
-#   ?X = :ind
-# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 :ind a :I8 .
-
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Proof for derived triple:
-#   :ind a :J8 .
-# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
-#   :ind a :N7 .
-# via the schematic forward rule:
-#   {
-#     ?X a :N7 .
-#   } => {
-#     ?X a :N8 .
-#     ?X a :I8 .
-#     ?X a :J8 .
-#   } .
-# with substitution (on rule variables):
-#   ?X = :ind
-# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 :ind a :J8 .
-
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Proof for derived triple:
-#   :ind a :N9 .
-# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
-#   :ind a :N8 .
-# via the schematic forward rule:
-#   {
-#     ?X a :N8 .
-#   } => {
-#     ?X a :N9 .
-#     ?X a :I9 .
-#     ?X a :J9 .
-#   } .
-# with substitution (on rule variables):
-#   ?X = :ind
-# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 :ind a :N9 .
-
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Proof for derived triple:
-#   :ind a :I9 .
-# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
-#   :ind a :N8 .
-# via the schematic forward rule:
-#   {
-#     ?X a :N8 .
-#   } => {
-#     ?X a :N9 .
-#     ?X a :I9 .
-#     ?X a :J9 .
-#   } .
-# with substitution (on rule variables):
-#   ?X = :ind
-# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 :ind a :I9 .
-
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Proof for derived triple:
-#   :ind a :J9 .
-# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
-#   :ind a :N8 .
-# via the schematic forward rule:
-#   {
-#     ?X a :N8 .
-#   } => {
-#     ?X a :N9 .
-#     ?X a :I9 .
-#     ?X a :J9 .
-#   } .
-# with substitution (on rule variables):
-#   ?X = :ind
-# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 :ind a :J9 .
-
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Proof for derived triple:
-#   :ind a :N10 .
-# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
-#   :ind a :N9 .
-# via the schematic forward rule:
-#   {
-#     ?X a :N9 .
-#   } => {
-#     ?X a :N10 .
-#     ?X a :I10 .
-#     ?X a :J10 .
-#   } .
-# with substitution (on rule variables):
-#   ?X = :ind
-# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 :ind a :N10 .
-
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Proof for derived triple:
-#   :ind a :I10 .
-# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
-#   :ind a :N9 .
-# via the schematic forward rule:
-#   {
-#     ?X a :N9 .
-#   } => {
-#     ?X a :N10 .
-#     ?X a :I10 .
-#     ?X a :J10 .
-#   } .
-# with substitution (on rule variables):
-#   ?X = :ind
-# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 :ind a :I10 .
-
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Proof for derived triple:
-#   :ind a :J10 .
-# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
-#   :ind a :N9 .
-# via the schematic forward rule:
-#   {
-#     ?X a :N9 .
-#   } => {
-#     ?X a :N10 .
-#     ?X a :I10 .
-#     ?X a :J10 .
-#   } .
-# with substitution (on rule variables):
-#   ?X = :ind
-# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 :ind a :J10 .
-
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Proof for derived triple:
-#   :ind a :A2 .
-# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
-#   :ind a :N10 .
-# via the schematic forward rule:
-#   {
-#     ?X a :N10 .
-#   } => {
-#     ?X a :A2 .
-#   } .
-# with substitution (on rule variables):
-#   ?X = :ind
-# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 :ind a :A2 .
-
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Proof for derived triple:
-#   :test :is true .
-# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
-#   :ind a :A2 .
-# via the schematic forward rule:
-#   {
-#     :ind a :A2 .
-#   } => {
-#     :test :is true .
-#   } .
-# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
-# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 :test :is true .
-