eyeling 1.22.5 → 1.22.7

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (38) hide show
  1. package/HANDBOOK.md +258 -9
  2. package/dist/browser/eyeling.browser.js +162 -11
  3. package/examples/act-alarm-bit-interoperability.n3 +180 -0
  4. package/examples/act-barley-seed-lineage.n3 +565 -0
  5. package/examples/act-docking-abort.n3 +285 -0
  6. package/examples/act-gravity-mediator-witness.n3 +235 -0
  7. package/examples/act-isolation-breach.n3 +354 -0
  8. package/examples/act-photosynthetic-exciton-transfer.n3 +245 -0
  9. package/examples/act-sensor-memory-reset.n3 +190 -0
  10. package/examples/act-tunnel-junction-wake-switch.n3 +225 -0
  11. package/examples/act-yeast-self-reproduction.n3 +248 -0
  12. package/examples/complex-matrix-stability.n3 +288 -0
  13. package/examples/deck/act-barley-seed-lineage.md +593 -0
  14. package/examples/fundamental-theorem-arithmetic.n3 +244 -0
  15. package/examples/harborsmr.n3 +233 -0
  16. package/examples/meta-rule-audit.n3 +135 -0
  17. package/examples/output/act-alarm-bit-interoperability.txt +20 -0
  18. package/examples/output/act-barley-seed-lineage.txt +25 -0
  19. package/examples/output/act-docking-abort.txt +22 -0
  20. package/examples/output/act-gravity-mediator-witness.txt +24 -0
  21. package/examples/output/act-isolation-breach.txt +27 -0
  22. package/examples/output/act-photosynthetic-exciton-transfer.txt +20 -0
  23. package/examples/output/act-sensor-memory-reset.txt +20 -0
  24. package/examples/output/act-tunnel-junction-wake-switch.txt +21 -0
  25. package/examples/output/act-yeast-self-reproduction.txt +23 -0
  26. package/examples/output/complex-matrix-stability.txt +14 -0
  27. package/examples/output/fundamental-theorem-arithmetic.txt +15 -0
  28. package/examples/output/get-uuid.n3 +2 -2
  29. package/examples/output/harborsmr.txt +20 -0
  30. package/examples/output/meta-rule-audit.n3 +44 -0
  31. package/examples/output/theory-diff.n3 +22 -0
  32. package/examples/theory-diff.n3 +125 -0
  33. package/eyeling.js +162 -11
  34. package/lib/builtins.js +52 -1
  35. package/lib/cli.js +31 -5
  36. package/lib/engine.js +79 -5
  37. package/package.json +1 -1
  38. package/test/api.test.js +127 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,354 @@
1
+ # ===============================================================================
2
+ # ACT isolation-breach token — broad constructor-theory coverage with can't-rules
3
+ #
4
+ # Concrete topic:
5
+ # A biosafety lab has an isolation-breach token that must be propagated across
6
+ # unlike classical media: a door beacon, a containment PLC, a nurse pager, and
7
+ # an incident board.
8
+ #
9
+ # This example therefore includes both sides:
10
+ # - CAN : the classical breach token can be prepared, permuted, copied,
11
+ # measured, and composed into serial and parallel networks
12
+ # - CAN'T : the quantum provenance seal cannot be universally cloned and
13
+ # therefore cannot be turned into an unrestricted fan-out token
14
+ # ===============================================================================
15
+
16
+ @prefix : <http://example.org/isolation-breach/> .
17
+ @prefix arc: <https://example.org/arc#> .
18
+ @prefix log: <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/log#> .
19
+
20
+ :case a arc:Case ;
21
+ arc:question "Can an isolation-breach token be prepared, permuted, copied, measured, and audited across unlike classical media, and what exactly can't be done with the quantum provenance seal?" .
22
+
23
+ # ---------------------------------------------------
24
+ # Classical media carrying the same abstract variable
25
+ # ---------------------------------------------------
26
+
27
+ :doorBeacon a :InformationMedium ;
28
+ :encodes :BreachBit ;
29
+ :zeroState :SafeGreen ;
30
+ :oneState :BreachRed .
31
+
32
+ :containmentPLC a :InformationMedium ;
33
+ :encodes :BreachBit ;
34
+ :zeroState :VoltageLow ;
35
+ :oneState :VoltageHigh .
36
+
37
+ :nursePager a :InformationMedium ;
38
+ :encodes :BreachBit ;
39
+ :zeroState :CodeNormal ;
40
+ :oneState :CodeBreach .
41
+
42
+ :incidentBoard a :InformationMedium ;
43
+ :encodes :BreachBit ;
44
+ :zeroState :BoardNormal ;
45
+ :oneState :BoardBreach .
46
+
47
+ # ---------------------------------------------------
48
+ # Contrast medium with superinformation-like behavior
49
+ # ---------------------------------------------------
50
+
51
+ :specimenSeal a :SuperinformationMedium ;
52
+ :encodes :SealVariable ;
53
+ :state :SealAlpha ;
54
+ :state :SealBeta ;
55
+ :state :SealGamma .
56
+
57
+ # ----------------------------------------------------------------
58
+ # CAN rules — what becomes possible for the classical breach token
59
+ # ----------------------------------------------------------------
60
+
61
+ # Information media support computation-like preparation, permutation,
62
+ # distinguishability, and local cloning for the designated variable.
63
+ { ?M a :InformationMedium ;
64
+ :encodes ?V ;
65
+ :zeroState ?Z ;
66
+ :oneState ?O . }
67
+ =>
68
+ {
69
+ ?M a :ComputationMedium .
70
+ ?M :distinguishes ?V .
71
+ ?M :can :PrepareInformationStates .
72
+ ?M :can :LocalPermutation .
73
+ ?M :can :LocalClone .
74
+
75
+ [ a :PossibleTask ;
76
+ :kind :Prepare ;
77
+ :on ?M ;
78
+ :variable ?V ;
79
+ :targetState ?Z ] .
80
+
81
+ [ a :PossibleTask ;
82
+ :kind :Prepare ;
83
+ :on ?M ;
84
+ :variable ?V ;
85
+ :targetState ?O ] .
86
+
87
+ [ a :PossibleTask ;
88
+ :kind :Permute ;
89
+ :on ?M ;
90
+ :variable ?V ;
91
+ :fromState ?Z ;
92
+ :toState ?O ] .
93
+
94
+ [ a :PossibleTask ;
95
+ :kind :Permute ;
96
+ :on ?M ;
97
+ :variable ?V ;
98
+ :fromState ?O ;
99
+ :toState ?Z ] .
100
+
101
+ [ a :PossibleTask ;
102
+ :kind :CloneLocal ;
103
+ :on ?M ;
104
+ :variable ?V ] .
105
+ } .
106
+
107
+ # If both directions of a permutation are possible, reversible computation is possible.
108
+ { [ a :PossibleTask ;
109
+ :kind :Permute ;
110
+ :on ?M ;
111
+ :variable ?V ;
112
+ :fromState ?X ;
113
+ :toState ?Y ] .
114
+ [ a :PossibleTask ;
115
+ :kind :Permute ;
116
+ :on ?M ;
117
+ :variable ?V ;
118
+ :fromState ?Y ;
119
+ :toState ?X ] . }
120
+ =>
121
+ { [ a :PossibleTask ;
122
+ :kind :ReversePermute ;
123
+ :on ?M ;
124
+ :variable ?V ] . } .
125
+
126
+ # Interoperability-style copying across unlike media carrying the same variable.
127
+ { ?A a :InformationMedium ; :encodes ?V .
128
+ ?B a :InformationMedium ; :encodes ?V . }
129
+ =>
130
+ { [ a :PossibleTask ;
131
+ :kind :Copy ;
132
+ :from ?A ;
133
+ :to ?B ;
134
+ :variable ?V ] . } .
135
+
136
+ # Measurement into any information medium that carries the same variable.
137
+ { ?A :distinguishes ?V .
138
+ ?B a :InformationMedium ;
139
+ :encodes ?V . }
140
+ =>
141
+ { [ a :PossibleTask ;
142
+ :kind :Measure ;
143
+ :from ?A ;
144
+ :to ?B ;
145
+ :variable ?V ] . } .
146
+
147
+ # Serial composition of possible tasks.
148
+ { [ a :PossibleTask ;
149
+ :kind :Copy ;
150
+ :from ?A ;
151
+ :to ?B ;
152
+ :variable ?V ] .
153
+ [ a :PossibleTask ;
154
+ :kind :Measure ;
155
+ :from ?B ;
156
+ :to ?C ;
157
+ :variable ?V ] . }
158
+ =>
159
+ { [ a :PossibleTask ;
160
+ :kind :SerialNetwork ;
161
+ :from ?A ;
162
+ :via ?B ;
163
+ :to ?C ;
164
+ :variable ?V ] . } .
165
+
166
+ # Parallel composition of possible tasks.
167
+ { [ a :PossibleTask ;
168
+ :kind :Copy ;
169
+ :from ?A ;
170
+ :to ?B ;
171
+ :variable ?V ] .
172
+ [ a :PossibleTask ;
173
+ :kind :Copy ;
174
+ :from ?A ;
175
+ :to ?C ;
176
+ :variable ?V ] . }
177
+ =>
178
+ { [ a :PossibleTask ;
179
+ :kind :ParallelNetwork ;
180
+ :source ?A ;
181
+ :left ?B ;
182
+ :right ?C ;
183
+ :variable ?V ] . } .
184
+
185
+ # -------------------------------------------------------------
186
+ # CAN'T rules — what becomes impossible for the provenance seal
187
+ # -------------------------------------------------------------
188
+
189
+ # A superinformation medium cannot have all of its states universally cloned.
190
+ { ?M a :SuperinformationMedium ;
191
+ :encodes ?V . }
192
+ =>
193
+ {
194
+ ?M :cannot :UniversalClone .
195
+ [ a :ImpossibleTask ;
196
+ :kind :CloneAllStates ;
197
+ :on ?M ;
198
+ :variable ?V ] .
199
+ } .
200
+
201
+ # If universal cloning is unavailable, unrestricted parallel fan-out is unavailable.
202
+ { ?M :cannot :UniversalClone . }
203
+ =>
204
+ { ?M :cannot :UnrestrictedParallelFanOut . } .
205
+
206
+ # ------
207
+ # Checks
208
+ # ------
209
+
210
+ # Positive checks for the classical breach token.
211
+ { :doorBeacon a :InformationMedium . }
212
+ => { :case :checkC1 :Passed . } .
213
+
214
+ { :containmentPLC a :InformationMedium . }
215
+ => { :case :checkC2 :Passed . } .
216
+
217
+ { :nursePager a :InformationMedium . }
218
+ => { :case :checkC3 :Passed . } .
219
+
220
+ { :incidentBoard a :InformationMedium . }
221
+ => { :case :checkC4 :Passed . } .
222
+
223
+ { :doorBeacon :distinguishes :BreachBit . }
224
+ => { :case :checkC5 :Passed . } .
225
+
226
+ { [ a :PossibleTask ;
227
+ :kind :Prepare ;
228
+ :on :nursePager ;
229
+ :variable :BreachBit ;
230
+ :targetState :CodeBreach ] . }
231
+ => { :case :checkC6 :Passed . } .
232
+
233
+ { [ a :PossibleTask ;
234
+ :kind :Permute ;
235
+ :on :doorBeacon ;
236
+ :variable :BreachBit ;
237
+ :fromState :SafeGreen ;
238
+ :toState :BreachRed ] . }
239
+ => { :case :checkC7 :Passed . } .
240
+
241
+ { [ a :PossibleTask ;
242
+ :kind :ReversePermute ;
243
+ :on :doorBeacon ;
244
+ :variable :BreachBit ] . }
245
+ => { :case :checkC8 :Passed . } .
246
+
247
+ { [ a :PossibleTask ;
248
+ :kind :CloneLocal ;
249
+ :on :containmentPLC ;
250
+ :variable :BreachBit ] . }
251
+ => { :case :checkC9 :Passed . } .
252
+
253
+ { [ a :PossibleTask ;
254
+ :kind :Copy ;
255
+ :from :doorBeacon ;
256
+ :to :containmentPLC ;
257
+ :variable :BreachBit ] . }
258
+ => { :case :checkC10 :Passed . } .
259
+
260
+ { [ a :PossibleTask ;
261
+ :kind :Copy ;
262
+ :from :containmentPLC ;
263
+ :to :nursePager ;
264
+ :variable :BreachBit ] . }
265
+ => { :case :checkC11 :Passed . } .
266
+
267
+ { [ a :PossibleTask ;
268
+ :kind :Measure ;
269
+ :from :nursePager ;
270
+ :to :incidentBoard ;
271
+ :variable :BreachBit ] . }
272
+ => { :case :checkC12 :Passed . } .
273
+
274
+ { [ a :PossibleTask ;
275
+ :kind :SerialNetwork ;
276
+ :from :doorBeacon ;
277
+ :via :containmentPLC ;
278
+ :to :incidentBoard ;
279
+ :variable :BreachBit ] . }
280
+ => { :case :checkC13 :Passed . } .
281
+
282
+ { [ a :PossibleTask ;
283
+ :kind :ParallelNetwork ;
284
+ :source :containmentPLC ;
285
+ :left :nursePager ;
286
+ :right :incidentBoard ;
287
+ :variable :BreachBit ] . }
288
+ => { :case :checkC14 :Passed . } .
289
+
290
+ # Negative checks for the provenance seal.
291
+ { [ a :ImpossibleTask ;
292
+ :kind :CloneAllStates ;
293
+ :on :specimenSeal ;
294
+ :variable :SealVariable ] . }
295
+ => { :case :checkC15 :Passed . } .
296
+
297
+ { :specimenSeal :cannot :UniversalClone . }
298
+ => { :case :checkC16 :Passed . } .
299
+
300
+ { :specimenSeal :cannot :UnrestrictedParallelFanOut . }
301
+ => { :case :checkC17 :Passed . } .
302
+
303
+ # ----------------
304
+ # ARC-style report
305
+ # ----------------
306
+
307
+ { :case :checkC1 :Passed .
308
+ :case :checkC2 :Passed .
309
+ :case :checkC3 :Passed .
310
+ :case :checkC4 :Passed .
311
+ :case :checkC5 :Passed .
312
+ :case :checkC6 :Passed .
313
+ :case :checkC7 :Passed .
314
+ :case :checkC8 :Passed .
315
+ :case :checkC9 :Passed .
316
+ :case :checkC10 :Passed .
317
+ :case :checkC11 :Passed .
318
+ :case :checkC12 :Passed .
319
+ :case :checkC13 :Passed .
320
+ :case :checkC14 :Passed .
321
+ :case :checkC15 :Passed .
322
+ :case :checkC16 :Passed .
323
+ :case :checkC17 :Passed . }
324
+ =>
325
+ {
326
+ :out log:outputString """ACT isolation-breach token — broad constructor-theory coverage case
327
+
328
+ Answer
329
+ YES for the classical isolation-breach token.
330
+ NO for universal cloning and unrestricted fan-out of the quantum provenance seal.
331
+
332
+ Reason Why
333
+ The isolation-breach token is treated as an abstract information variable carried by unlike classical media: a door beacon, a containment PLC, a nurse pager, and an incident board. Because those substrates are information media for the same variable, the token can be prepared, permuted, reversed, cloned locally, copied across media, measured into an output record, and composed into serial and parallel task networks. By contrast, the specimen seal is treated as a superinformation medium, so cloning all of its states is impossible and unrestricted parallel fan-out is blocked.
334
+
335
+ Check
336
+ C1 OK - the door beacon is an information medium
337
+ C2 OK - the containment PLC is an information medium
338
+ C3 OK - the nurse pager is an information medium
339
+ C4 OK - the incident board is an information medium
340
+ C5 OK - the door beacon distinguishes the breach bit
341
+ C6 OK - the breach state can be prepared on the nurse pager
342
+ C7 OK - permutation from safe to breach is possible on the door beacon
343
+ C8 OK - the door beacon supports reversible permutation
344
+ C9 OK - local cloning of the breach bit is possible on the containment PLC
345
+ C10 OK - the breach bit can be copied from door beacon to containment PLC
346
+ C11 OK - the breach bit can be copied from containment PLC to nurse pager
347
+ C12 OK - the breach bit can be measured from nurse pager into the incident board
348
+ C13 OK - a serial network from door beacon via containment PLC to incident board is possible
349
+ C14 OK - a parallel network from containment PLC to nurse pager and incident board is possible
350
+ C15 OK - cloning all states of the specimen seal is an impossible task
351
+ C16 OK - the specimen seal cannot be universally cloned
352
+ C17 OK - the specimen seal cannot support unrestricted parallel fan-out
353
+ """ .
354
+ } .
@@ -0,0 +1,245 @@
1
+ # =========================================================================
2
+ # ACT photosynthetic exciton transfer
3
+ #
4
+ # Applied constructor-theory case:
5
+ # A photosynthetic antenna must deliver an electronic excitation to a
6
+ # reaction center before it is lost.
7
+ #
8
+ # This example is intentionally careful:
9
+ # it does NOT assume that long-lived electronic coherence is required.
10
+ # Instead it models a more modest and defensible claim:
11
+ #
12
+ # - a tuned complex CAN exploit short-lived excitonic/vibronic assistance
13
+ # to make reaction-center delivery possible;
14
+ # - a detuned, strongly decohered contrast complex CAN'T achieve the
15
+ # same transfer task efficiently in the same regime.
16
+ #
17
+ # The example is ACT-style because it expresses the application in terms
18
+ # of possible and impossible tasks.
19
+ # =========================================================================
20
+
21
+ @prefix : <http://example.org/act/photosynthesis/> .
22
+ @prefix arc: <https://example.org/arc#> .
23
+ @prefix log: <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/log#> .
24
+
25
+ :case a arc:Case ;
26
+ arc:question "Can a tuned photosynthetic antenna deliver excitation efficiently to a reaction center by short-lived quantum-assisted transfer, while a detuned contrast complex cannot?" .
27
+
28
+ # -------------------------
29
+ # Shared application target
30
+ # -------------------------
31
+
32
+ :reactionCenter a :ReactionCenter .
33
+ :harvestTask a :ExcitationDeliveryTask ;
34
+ :target :reactionCenter ;
35
+ :lossChannel :ExcitonRecombination .
36
+
37
+ # -------------------------------
38
+ # Device A: tuned antenna complex
39
+ # -------------------------------
40
+
41
+ # This complex has the structural ingredients usually invoked in careful,
42
+ # modern discussions of quantum-assisted transfer:
43
+ # - coupled excitonic states
44
+ # - some delocalization
45
+ # - a vibronic bridge
46
+ # - a downhill energetic route
47
+ # - short, not long-lived, coherence
48
+ # - moderate rather than overwhelming dephasing
49
+ :tunedAntenna a :LightHarvestingComplex ;
50
+ :encodes :ExcitonPathway ;
51
+ :excitonCoupling :Strong ;
52
+ :stateDelocalization :Present ;
53
+ :vibronicBridge :Tuned ;
54
+ :energyLandscape :DownhillToReactionCenter ;
55
+ :electronicCoherenceLifetime :Short ;
56
+ :dephasing :Moderate ;
57
+ :connectedTo :reactionCenter .
58
+
59
+ # ----------------------------------
60
+ # Device B: detuned contrast complex
61
+ # ----------------------------------
62
+
63
+ # This one lacks the helpful alignment:
64
+ # - weaker coupling
65
+ # - no useful delocalization
66
+ # - no vibronic bridge
67
+ # - a trapping mismatch
68
+ # - strong dephasing
69
+ :detunedAntenna a :LightHarvestingComplex ;
70
+ :encodes :ExcitonPathway ;
71
+ :excitonCoupling :Weak ;
72
+ :stateDelocalization :Absent ;
73
+ :vibronicBridge :Absent ;
74
+ :energyLandscape :TrappingMismatch ;
75
+ :electronicCoherenceLifetime :VeryShort ;
76
+ :dephasing :Strong ;
77
+ :connectedTo :reactionCenter .
78
+
79
+ # ---------------------------------
80
+ # CAN rules — what becomes possible
81
+ # ---------------------------------
82
+
83
+ # Strong excitonic coupling plus some delocalization makes
84
+ # coherent pathway sampling possible.
85
+ { ?C a :LightHarvestingComplex ;
86
+ :excitonCoupling :Strong ;
87
+ :stateDelocalization :Present . }
88
+ =>
89
+ { ?C :can :CoherentPathwaySampling . } .
90
+
91
+ # A tuned vibronic bridge plus non-overwhelming dephasing
92
+ # makes vibronically assisted transfer possible.
93
+ { ?C a :LightHarvestingComplex ;
94
+ :vibronicBridge :Tuned ;
95
+ :dephasing :Moderate . }
96
+ =>
97
+ { ?C :can :VibronicallyAssistedTransfer . } .
98
+
99
+ # This is the careful "science of can" claim:
100
+ # short-lived electronic coherence is enough for a useful
101
+ # transfer contribution when the bridge and landscape are
102
+ # favorable. Long-lived coherence is not required here.
103
+ { ?C a :LightHarvestingComplex ;
104
+ :electronicCoherenceLifetime :Short ;
105
+ :energyLandscape :DownhillToReactionCenter . }
106
+ =>
107
+ { ?C :can :ShortLivedQuantumAssistance . } .
108
+
109
+ # Efficient exciton transfer is possible when coherent
110
+ # pathway sampling, vibronic assistance, and a downhill
111
+ # energetic route are all available.
112
+ { ?C :can :CoherentPathwaySampling .
113
+ ?C :can :VibronicallyAssistedTransfer .
114
+ ?C :can :ShortLivedQuantumAssistance .
115
+ ?C :energyLandscape :DownhillToReactionCenter . }
116
+ =>
117
+ { ?C :can :EfficientExcitonTransfer . } .
118
+
119
+ # If efficient transfer is possible and the antenna is
120
+ # connected to the reaction center, reaction-center delivery
121
+ # is possible.
122
+ { ?C :can :EfficientExcitonTransfer ;
123
+ :connectedTo ?RC .
124
+ ?RC a :ReactionCenter . }
125
+ =>
126
+ { ?C :can :DeliverExcitationToReactionCenter . } .
127
+
128
+ # -------------------------------------
129
+ # CAN'T rules — what becomes impossible
130
+ # -------------------------------------
131
+
132
+ # Weak coupling and absent delocalization block coherent
133
+ # pathway sampling.
134
+ { ?C a :LightHarvestingComplex ;
135
+ :excitonCoupling :Weak ;
136
+ :stateDelocalization :Absent . }
137
+ =>
138
+ { ?C :cannot :CoherentPathwaySampling . } .
139
+
140
+ # No vibronic bridge and strong dephasing block vibronically
141
+ # assisted transfer.
142
+ { ?C a :LightHarvestingComplex ;
143
+ :vibronicBridge :Absent ;
144
+ :dephasing :Strong . }
145
+ =>
146
+ { ?C :cannot :VibronicallyAssistedTransfer . } .
147
+
148
+ # A trapping mismatch blocks directed downhill delivery.
149
+ { ?C a :LightHarvestingComplex ;
150
+ :energyLandscape :TrappingMismatch . }
151
+ =>
152
+ { ?C :cannot :DirectedReactionCenterTransfer . } .
153
+
154
+ # If the complex cannot sample pathways coherently and
155
+ # cannot use vibronic assistance, efficient transfer is not
156
+ # achievable in this operating picture.
157
+ { ?C :cannot :CoherentPathwaySampling .
158
+ ?C :cannot :VibronicallyAssistedTransfer . }
159
+ =>
160
+ { ?C :cannot :EfficientExcitonTransfer . } .
161
+
162
+ # Even if some transfer happens, a trapping mismatch blocks
163
+ # efficient delivery to the reaction center in this case.
164
+ { ?C :cannot :DirectedReactionCenterTransfer . }
165
+ =>
166
+ { ?C :cannot :DeliverExcitationToReactionCenter . } .
167
+
168
+ { ?C :cannot :EfficientExcitonTransfer . }
169
+ =>
170
+ { ?C :cannot :DeliverExcitationToReactionCenter . } .
171
+
172
+ # ------
173
+ # Checks
174
+ # ------
175
+
176
+ # Positive checks for the tuned complex.
177
+ { :tunedAntenna :can :CoherentPathwaySampling . }
178
+ => { :case :checkC1 :Passed . } .
179
+
180
+ { :tunedAntenna :can :VibronicallyAssistedTransfer . }
181
+ => { :case :checkC2 :Passed . } .
182
+
183
+ { :tunedAntenna :can :ShortLivedQuantumAssistance . }
184
+ => { :case :checkC3 :Passed . } .
185
+
186
+ { :tunedAntenna :can :EfficientExcitonTransfer . }
187
+ => { :case :checkC4 :Passed . } .
188
+
189
+ { :tunedAntenna :can :DeliverExcitationToReactionCenter . }
190
+ => { :case :checkC5 :Passed . } .
191
+
192
+ # Negative checks for the detuned complex.
193
+ { :detunedAntenna :cannot :CoherentPathwaySampling . }
194
+ => { :case :checkC6 :Passed . } .
195
+
196
+ { :detunedAntenna :cannot :VibronicallyAssistedTransfer . }
197
+ => { :case :checkC7 :Passed . } .
198
+
199
+ { :detunedAntenna :cannot :DirectedReactionCenterTransfer . }
200
+ => { :case :checkC8 :Passed . } .
201
+
202
+ { :detunedAntenna :cannot :EfficientExcitonTransfer . }
203
+ => { :case :checkC9 :Passed . } .
204
+
205
+ { :detunedAntenna :cannot :DeliverExcitationToReactionCenter . }
206
+ => { :case :checkC10 :Passed . } .
207
+
208
+ # ----------------
209
+ # ARC-style output
210
+ # ----------------
211
+
212
+ { :case :checkC1 :Passed .
213
+ :case :checkC2 :Passed .
214
+ :case :checkC3 :Passed .
215
+ :case :checkC4 :Passed .
216
+ :case :checkC5 :Passed .
217
+ :case :checkC6 :Passed .
218
+ :case :checkC7 :Passed .
219
+ :case :checkC8 :Passed .
220
+ :case :checkC9 :Passed .
221
+ :case :checkC10 :Passed . }
222
+ =>
223
+ {
224
+ :out log:outputString """ACT photosynthetic exciton transfer
225
+
226
+ Answer
227
+ YES for the tuned antenna complex.
228
+ NO for the detuned, strongly decohered contrast complex.
229
+
230
+ Reason Why
231
+ The tuned complex can sample exciton pathways coherently, use vibronically assisted transfer, and exploit short-lived quantum assistance along a downhill route to the reaction center. That makes efficient exciton transfer and reaction-center delivery possible in this case. The detuned contrast complex lacks the same alignment: coherent pathway sampling is blocked, vibronic assistance is unavailable, and the energy landscape is mismatched, so efficient reaction-center delivery is not possible in the same operating picture.
232
+
233
+ Check
234
+ C1 OK - the tuned complex can sample exciton pathways coherently
235
+ C2 OK - the tuned complex can use vibronically assisted transfer
236
+ C3 OK - short-lived quantum assistance is enough in the tuned downhill regime
237
+ C4 OK - efficient exciton transfer is possible in the tuned complex
238
+ C5 OK - the tuned complex can deliver excitation to the reaction center
239
+ C6 OK - the detuned complex cannot sample pathways coherently
240
+ C7 OK - the detuned complex cannot use vibronically assisted transfer
241
+ C8 OK - the detuned complex cannot achieve directed reaction-center transfer
242
+ C9 OK - the detuned complex cannot achieve efficient exciton transfer
243
+ C10 OK - the detuned complex cannot deliver excitation efficiently to the reaction center
244
+ """ .
245
+ } .