eyeling 1.22.14 → 1.22.16
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/HANDBOOK.md +21 -0
- package/dist/browser/eyeling.browser.js +184 -158
- package/examples/barley-seed-becoming.n3 +497 -0
- package/examples/constructor-theory-becoming.n3 +177 -0
- package/examples/control-system-becoming.n3 +203 -0
- package/examples/developmental-genetics-becoming.n3 +204 -0
- package/examples/engineering-becoming.n3 +167 -0
- package/examples/output/barley-seed-becoming.txt +25 -0
- package/examples/output/constructor-theory-becoming.n3 +18 -0
- package/examples/output/control-system-becoming.n3 +35 -0
- package/examples/output/developmental-genetics-becoming.n3 +32 -0
- package/examples/output/engineering-becoming.n3 +26 -0
- package/examples/output/tunnel-junction-wake-switch-becoming.txt +21 -0
- package/examples/output/whitehead-becoming.n3 +42 -0
- package/examples/tunnel-junction-wake-switch-becoming.n3 +216 -0
- package/examples/whitehead-becoming.n3 +155 -0
- package/eyeling.js +184 -159
- package/lib/builtins.js +164 -151
- package/lib/engine.js +20 -7
- package/package.json +1 -1
|
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
tunnel-junction wake switch — becoming
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
Answer
|
|
4
|
+
YES for the tunnel junction.
|
|
5
|
+
NO for the conventional low-bias PN junction in the same wake-switch regime.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
Reason Why
|
|
8
|
+
The tunnel junction can be read as a becoming under low forward bias. Because it is modeled as a heavily doped narrow PN junction with overlapping states, it can become a quantum-transfer state. In that regime it can become a sub-threshold current state, and under peak-to-valley scanning it can also become a negative differential response state. As a wake-switch device, that lets it become an ultra-low-bias switching state and finally a leak-alarm wake-serving state. By contrast, the conventional junction lacks the structural conditions needed for the same transition into quantum transfer, so the later wake-serving becoming is blocked as well.
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
Check
|
|
11
|
+
B1 OK - the tunnel junction can become a quantum-transfer state
|
|
12
|
+
B2 OK - the tunnel junction is classified as tunneling-dominant
|
|
13
|
+
B3 OK - the tunnel junction can become a sub-threshold current state
|
|
14
|
+
B4 OK - the tunnel junction can become a negative differential response state
|
|
15
|
+
B5 OK - the tunnel junction can become an ultra-low-bias switching state
|
|
16
|
+
B6 OK - the tunnel junction can become a leak-alarm wake-serving state
|
|
17
|
+
B7 OK - the conventional junction cannot become a quantum-transfer state
|
|
18
|
+
B8 OK - the conventional junction cannot become a sub-threshold current state
|
|
19
|
+
B9 OK - the conventional junction cannot become the tunnel-style negative differential state
|
|
20
|
+
B10 OK - the conventional junction cannot become an ultra-low-bias switching state here
|
|
21
|
+
B11 OK - the conventional junction cannot become a leak-alarm wake-serving state in this case
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
@prefix : <http://example.org/whitehead#> .
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
:o1 :status :objectivelyAvailable .
|
|
4
|
+
:o1 :availableForFuturePrehension :yes .
|
|
5
|
+
:o2 :becomesFrom :o1 .
|
|
6
|
+
:o3 :becomesFrom :o2 .
|
|
7
|
+
:o2 :inherits :red .
|
|
8
|
+
:o2 :inherits :warm .
|
|
9
|
+
:o2 :mayRealize :bright .
|
|
10
|
+
:o3 :mayRealize :dark .
|
|
11
|
+
:o2 :integrates :red .
|
|
12
|
+
:o2 :integrates :bright .
|
|
13
|
+
:o2 :achieves :satisfaction .
|
|
14
|
+
:o2 :integrates :warm .
|
|
15
|
+
:o2 :realizes :red .
|
|
16
|
+
:o2 :realizes :bright .
|
|
17
|
+
:o2 :realizes :warm .
|
|
18
|
+
:o1 :ingresses :red .
|
|
19
|
+
:o1 :ingresses :warm .
|
|
20
|
+
:o2 :ingresses :red .
|
|
21
|
+
:o2 :ingresses :bright .
|
|
22
|
+
:o2 :ingresses :warm .
|
|
23
|
+
:o2 :status :objectivelyAvailable .
|
|
24
|
+
:o2 :availableForFuturePrehension :yes .
|
|
25
|
+
:o3 :inherits :red .
|
|
26
|
+
:o3 :inherits :bright .
|
|
27
|
+
:o3 :inherits :warm .
|
|
28
|
+
:o3 :integrates :red .
|
|
29
|
+
:o3 :integrates :dark .
|
|
30
|
+
:o3 :achieves :satisfaction .
|
|
31
|
+
:o3 :integrates :bright .
|
|
32
|
+
:o3 :integrates :warm .
|
|
33
|
+
:o3 :realizes :red .
|
|
34
|
+
:o3 :realizes :dark .
|
|
35
|
+
:o3 :realizes :bright .
|
|
36
|
+
:o3 :realizes :warm .
|
|
37
|
+
:o3 :ingresses :red .
|
|
38
|
+
:o3 :ingresses :dark .
|
|
39
|
+
:o3 :ingresses :bright .
|
|
40
|
+
:o3 :ingresses :warm .
|
|
41
|
+
:o3 :status :objectivelyAvailable .
|
|
42
|
+
:o3 :availableForFuturePrehension :yes .
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,216 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# =================================================================================
|
|
2
|
+
# tunnel-junction wake switch — becoming
|
|
3
|
+
#
|
|
4
|
+
# This example reframes the wake-switch case as a becoming example.
|
|
5
|
+
# The device is not treated as a static component with capabilities, but as a
|
|
6
|
+
# system that can or cannot pass into a low-bias wake-triggering state.
|
|
7
|
+
#
|
|
8
|
+
# We compare two devices:
|
|
9
|
+
# - tunnelJunction : a heavily doped narrow PN junction with overlapping states
|
|
10
|
+
# - ordinaryJunction : a conventional PN junction without that overlap
|
|
11
|
+
#
|
|
12
|
+
# The point is to show:
|
|
13
|
+
# - what the tunnel junction can become under the low-bias requirement
|
|
14
|
+
# - what the conventional junction cannot become under the same requirement
|
|
15
|
+
# =================================================================================
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
@prefix : <http://example.org/tunnel-junction-wake-switch-becoming/> .
|
|
18
|
+
@prefix arc: <https://example.org/arc#> .
|
|
19
|
+
@prefix log: <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/log#> .
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
:case a arc:Case ;
|
|
22
|
+
arc:question "Can a tunnel-junction wake switch become a low-bias wake-triggering state in a regime where a conventional PN junction cannot?" .
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
# -------------------
|
|
25
|
+
# Application context
|
|
26
|
+
# -------------------
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
:leakAlarmNode a :EdgeSensor ;
|
|
29
|
+
:needs :MicrowattWakeSwitching ;
|
|
30
|
+
:application :PipeLeakAlarm .
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
# ----------------------------------
|
|
33
|
+
# Device A: tunnel-style PN junction
|
|
34
|
+
# ----------------------------------
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
:tunnelJunction a :PNJunction ;
|
|
37
|
+
:junctionKind :TunnelDiode ;
|
|
38
|
+
:doping :Heavy ;
|
|
39
|
+
:depletionWidth :Narrow ;
|
|
40
|
+
:stateAlignment :Overlap ;
|
|
41
|
+
:biasRegime :LowForwardBias ;
|
|
42
|
+
:scanProfile :PeakToValley ;
|
|
43
|
+
:deviceRole :WakeSwitch .
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
# ----------------------------------
|
|
46
|
+
# Device B: conventional PN junction
|
|
47
|
+
# ----------------------------------
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
:ordinaryJunction a :PNJunction ;
|
|
50
|
+
:junctionKind :ConventionalDiode ;
|
|
51
|
+
:doping :Standard ;
|
|
52
|
+
:depletionWidth :Wide ;
|
|
53
|
+
:stateAlignment :NoOverlap ;
|
|
54
|
+
:biasRegime :LowForwardBias ;
|
|
55
|
+
:scanProfile :MonotoneForward ;
|
|
56
|
+
:deviceRole :WakeSwitch .
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
# -------------------------------------------
|
|
59
|
+
# CAN-BECOME rules — viable state transitions
|
|
60
|
+
# -------------------------------------------
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
# A heavily doped, narrow junction with overlapping states can become a
|
|
63
|
+
# quantum-transfer-supporting junction.
|
|
64
|
+
{ ?J a :PNJunction ;
|
|
65
|
+
:doping :Heavy ;
|
|
66
|
+
:depletionWidth :Narrow ;
|
|
67
|
+
:stateAlignment :Overlap . }
|
|
68
|
+
=>
|
|
69
|
+
{ ?J :canBecome :QuantumTransferState ;
|
|
70
|
+
:transportMode :TunnelingDominant . } .
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
# In the low-forward-bias regime, a junction in the quantum-transfer state can
|
|
73
|
+
# become a sub-threshold current state.
|
|
74
|
+
{ ?J :canBecome :QuantumTransferState ;
|
|
75
|
+
:biasRegime :LowForwardBias . }
|
|
76
|
+
=>
|
|
77
|
+
{ ?J :canBecome :SubThresholdCurrentState . } .
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
# If the junction is scanned across the peak-to-valley window, it can become a
|
|
80
|
+
# negative differential response state.
|
|
81
|
+
{ ?J :canBecome :QuantumTransferState ;
|
|
82
|
+
:scanProfile :PeakToValley . }
|
|
83
|
+
=>
|
|
84
|
+
{ ?J :canBecome :NegativeDifferentialResponseState . } .
|
|
85
|
+
|
|
86
|
+
# A wake-switch device that can become a sub-threshold current state can become
|
|
87
|
+
# an ultra-low-bias switching state.
|
|
88
|
+
{ ?J :canBecome :SubThresholdCurrentState ;
|
|
89
|
+
:deviceRole :WakeSwitch . }
|
|
90
|
+
=>
|
|
91
|
+
{ ?J :canBecome :UltraLowBiasSwitchingState . } .
|
|
92
|
+
|
|
93
|
+
# If the device can become an ultra-low-bias switching state and the node needs
|
|
94
|
+
# microwatt wake switching, it can become a wake-serving device.
|
|
95
|
+
{ ?J :canBecome :UltraLowBiasSwitchingState .
|
|
96
|
+
:leakAlarmNode :needs :MicrowattWakeSwitching . }
|
|
97
|
+
=>
|
|
98
|
+
{ ?J :canBecome :LeakAlarmWakeServingState . } .
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
# -----------------------------------------------
|
|
101
|
+
# CANNOT-BECOME rules — blocked state transitions
|
|
102
|
+
# -----------------------------------------------
|
|
103
|
+
|
|
104
|
+
# A conventional wide-depletion low-bias junction without state overlap cannot
|
|
105
|
+
# become a quantum-transfer-supporting junction.
|
|
106
|
+
{ ?J a :PNJunction ;
|
|
107
|
+
:doping :Standard ;
|
|
108
|
+
:depletionWidth :Wide ;
|
|
109
|
+
:stateAlignment :NoOverlap . }
|
|
110
|
+
=>
|
|
111
|
+
{ ?J :cannotBecome :QuantumTransferState . } .
|
|
112
|
+
|
|
113
|
+
# Without that quantum-transfer state, the junction cannot become a
|
|
114
|
+
# sub-threshold current state in the same low-bias regime.
|
|
115
|
+
{ ?J :cannotBecome :QuantumTransferState ;
|
|
116
|
+
:biasRegime :LowForwardBias . }
|
|
117
|
+
=>
|
|
118
|
+
{ ?J :cannotBecome :SubThresholdCurrentState . } .
|
|
119
|
+
|
|
120
|
+
# Without quantum transfer, the tunnel-style negative differential state is
|
|
121
|
+
# blocked as well.
|
|
122
|
+
{ ?J :cannotBecome :QuantumTransferState . }
|
|
123
|
+
=>
|
|
124
|
+
{ ?J :cannotBecome :NegativeDifferentialResponseState . } .
|
|
125
|
+
|
|
126
|
+
# Without sub-threshold current, the device cannot become an ultra-low-bias
|
|
127
|
+
# switching state.
|
|
128
|
+
{ ?J :cannotBecome :SubThresholdCurrentState ;
|
|
129
|
+
:deviceRole :WakeSwitch . }
|
|
130
|
+
=>
|
|
131
|
+
{ ?J :cannotBecome :UltraLowBiasSwitchingState . } .
|
|
132
|
+
|
|
133
|
+
# Without ultra-low-bias switching, the device cannot become a wake-serving
|
|
134
|
+
# device for the leak-alarm node.
|
|
135
|
+
{ ?J :cannotBecome :UltraLowBiasSwitchingState .
|
|
136
|
+
:leakAlarmNode :needs :MicrowattWakeSwitching . }
|
|
137
|
+
=>
|
|
138
|
+
{ ?J :cannotBecome :LeakAlarmWakeServingState . } .
|
|
139
|
+
|
|
140
|
+
# ------
|
|
141
|
+
# Checks
|
|
142
|
+
# ------
|
|
143
|
+
|
|
144
|
+
{ :tunnelJunction :canBecome :QuantumTransferState . }
|
|
145
|
+
=> { :case :checkB1 :Passed . } .
|
|
146
|
+
|
|
147
|
+
{ :tunnelJunction :transportMode :TunnelingDominant . }
|
|
148
|
+
=> { :case :checkB2 :Passed . } .
|
|
149
|
+
|
|
150
|
+
{ :tunnelJunction :canBecome :SubThresholdCurrentState . }
|
|
151
|
+
=> { :case :checkB3 :Passed . } .
|
|
152
|
+
|
|
153
|
+
{ :tunnelJunction :canBecome :NegativeDifferentialResponseState . }
|
|
154
|
+
=> { :case :checkB4 :Passed . } .
|
|
155
|
+
|
|
156
|
+
{ :tunnelJunction :canBecome :UltraLowBiasSwitchingState . }
|
|
157
|
+
=> { :case :checkB5 :Passed . } .
|
|
158
|
+
|
|
159
|
+
{ :tunnelJunction :canBecome :LeakAlarmWakeServingState . }
|
|
160
|
+
=> { :case :checkB6 :Passed . } .
|
|
161
|
+
|
|
162
|
+
{ :ordinaryJunction :cannotBecome :QuantumTransferState . }
|
|
163
|
+
=> { :case :checkB7 :Passed . } .
|
|
164
|
+
|
|
165
|
+
{ :ordinaryJunction :cannotBecome :SubThresholdCurrentState . }
|
|
166
|
+
=> { :case :checkB8 :Passed . } .
|
|
167
|
+
|
|
168
|
+
{ :ordinaryJunction :cannotBecome :NegativeDifferentialResponseState . }
|
|
169
|
+
=> { :case :checkB9 :Passed . } .
|
|
170
|
+
|
|
171
|
+
{ :ordinaryJunction :cannotBecome :UltraLowBiasSwitchingState . }
|
|
172
|
+
=> { :case :checkB10 :Passed . } .
|
|
173
|
+
|
|
174
|
+
{ :ordinaryJunction :cannotBecome :LeakAlarmWakeServingState . }
|
|
175
|
+
=> { :case :checkB11 :Passed . } .
|
|
176
|
+
|
|
177
|
+
# ----------------
|
|
178
|
+
# ARC-style output
|
|
179
|
+
# ----------------
|
|
180
|
+
|
|
181
|
+
{ :case :checkB1 :Passed .
|
|
182
|
+
:case :checkB2 :Passed .
|
|
183
|
+
:case :checkB3 :Passed .
|
|
184
|
+
:case :checkB4 :Passed .
|
|
185
|
+
:case :checkB5 :Passed .
|
|
186
|
+
:case :checkB6 :Passed .
|
|
187
|
+
:case :checkB7 :Passed .
|
|
188
|
+
:case :checkB8 :Passed .
|
|
189
|
+
:case :checkB9 :Passed .
|
|
190
|
+
:case :checkB10 :Passed .
|
|
191
|
+
:case :checkB11 :Passed . }
|
|
192
|
+
=>
|
|
193
|
+
{
|
|
194
|
+
:out log:outputString """tunnel-junction wake switch — becoming
|
|
195
|
+
|
|
196
|
+
Answer
|
|
197
|
+
YES for the tunnel junction.
|
|
198
|
+
NO for the conventional low-bias PN junction in the same wake-switch regime.
|
|
199
|
+
|
|
200
|
+
Reason Why
|
|
201
|
+
The tunnel junction can be read as a becoming under low forward bias. Because it is modeled as a heavily doped narrow PN junction with overlapping states, it can become a quantum-transfer state. In that regime it can become a sub-threshold current state, and under peak-to-valley scanning it can also become a negative differential response state. As a wake-switch device, that lets it become an ultra-low-bias switching state and finally a leak-alarm wake-serving state. By contrast, the conventional junction lacks the structural conditions needed for the same transition into quantum transfer, so the later wake-serving becoming is blocked as well.
|
|
202
|
+
|
|
203
|
+
Check
|
|
204
|
+
B1 OK - the tunnel junction can become a quantum-transfer state
|
|
205
|
+
B2 OK - the tunnel junction is classified as tunneling-dominant
|
|
206
|
+
B3 OK - the tunnel junction can become a sub-threshold current state
|
|
207
|
+
B4 OK - the tunnel junction can become a negative differential response state
|
|
208
|
+
B5 OK - the tunnel junction can become an ultra-low-bias switching state
|
|
209
|
+
B6 OK - the tunnel junction can become a leak-alarm wake-serving state
|
|
210
|
+
B7 OK - the conventional junction cannot become a quantum-transfer state
|
|
211
|
+
B8 OK - the conventional junction cannot become a sub-threshold current state
|
|
212
|
+
B9 OK - the conventional junction cannot become the tunnel-style negative differential state
|
|
213
|
+
B10 OK - the conventional junction cannot become an ultra-low-bias switching state here
|
|
214
|
+
B11 OK - the conventional junction cannot become a leak-alarm wake-serving state in this case
|
|
215
|
+
""" .
|
|
216
|
+
} .
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# ================================================================
|
|
2
|
+
# This program models becoming as a relational event. Each actual
|
|
3
|
+
# occasion takes up a past, inherits what has been realized,
|
|
4
|
+
# responds to a lure of possible form, and gathers these into a
|
|
5
|
+
# new satisfaction. What becomes is never wholly lost: once
|
|
6
|
+
# achieved, it stands available for future prehension. The logic
|
|
7
|
+
# below is therefore not a logic of static things, but of process,
|
|
8
|
+
# inheritance, and renewed concretion.
|
|
9
|
+
# =========================================#======================
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
@prefix : <http://example.org/whitehead#>.
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
# ----------
|
|
14
|
+
# CATEGORIES
|
|
15
|
+
# ----------
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
:ActualOccasion a :Category.
|
|
18
|
+
:PurePotential a :Category.
|
|
19
|
+
:SubjectiveAim a :Category.
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
# ---------------
|
|
22
|
+
# PURE POTENTIALS
|
|
23
|
+
# ---------------
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
:red a :PurePotential.
|
|
26
|
+
:warm a :PurePotential.
|
|
27
|
+
:bright a :PurePotential.
|
|
28
|
+
:dark a :PurePotential.
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
# -------------------------------
|
|
31
|
+
# SUBJECTIVE AIMS AND THEIR LURES
|
|
32
|
+
# -------------------------------
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
:intensity a :SubjectiveAim.
|
|
35
|
+
:contrast a :SubjectiveAim.
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
:intensity :lures :bright.
|
|
38
|
+
:contrast :lures :dark.
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
# -------------
|
|
41
|
+
# INITIAL WORLD
|
|
42
|
+
# -------------
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
44
|
+
:o1 a :ActualOccasion;
|
|
45
|
+
:time 1;
|
|
46
|
+
:realizes :red, :warm;
|
|
47
|
+
:achieves :satisfaction.
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
:o2 a :ActualOccasion;
|
|
50
|
+
:time 2;
|
|
51
|
+
:prehends :o1;
|
|
52
|
+
:subjectiveAim :intensity.
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
:o3 a :ActualOccasion;
|
|
55
|
+
:time 3;
|
|
56
|
+
:prehends :o2;
|
|
57
|
+
:subjectiveAim :contrast.
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
# ---------------------------
|
|
60
|
+
# RULE 1
|
|
61
|
+
# PREHENSION AS BECOMING-FROM
|
|
62
|
+
# ---------------------------
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
{
|
|
65
|
+
?later :prehends ?earlier.
|
|
66
|
+
}
|
|
67
|
+
=>
|
|
68
|
+
{
|
|
69
|
+
?later :becomesFrom ?earlier.
|
|
70
|
+
}.
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
# -----------------------------
|
|
73
|
+
# RULE 2
|
|
74
|
+
# INHERITANCE OF REALIZED FORMS
|
|
75
|
+
# -----------------------------
|
|
76
|
+
|
|
77
|
+
{
|
|
78
|
+
?later :prehends ?earlier.
|
|
79
|
+
?earlier :realizes ?form.
|
|
80
|
+
}
|
|
81
|
+
=>
|
|
82
|
+
{
|
|
83
|
+
?later :inherits ?form.
|
|
84
|
+
}.
|
|
85
|
+
|
|
86
|
+
# ---------------------------
|
|
87
|
+
# RULE 3
|
|
88
|
+
# SUBJECTIVE AIM OPENS A LURE
|
|
89
|
+
# ---------------------------
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
{
|
|
92
|
+
?o :subjectiveAim ?aim.
|
|
93
|
+
?aim :lures ?form.
|
|
94
|
+
}
|
|
95
|
+
=>
|
|
96
|
+
{
|
|
97
|
+
?o :mayRealize ?form.
|
|
98
|
+
}.
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
# --------------------------------------------
|
|
101
|
+
# RULE 4
|
|
102
|
+
# CONCRESCENCE INTEGRATES PAST AND POSSIBILITY
|
|
103
|
+
# --------------------------------------------
|
|
104
|
+
|
|
105
|
+
{
|
|
106
|
+
?o :inherits ?pastForm.
|
|
107
|
+
?o :mayRealize ?novelForm.
|
|
108
|
+
}
|
|
109
|
+
=>
|
|
110
|
+
{
|
|
111
|
+
?o :integrates ?pastForm, ?novelForm;
|
|
112
|
+
:achieves :satisfaction.
|
|
113
|
+
}.
|
|
114
|
+
|
|
115
|
+
# ---------------------------------
|
|
116
|
+
# RULE 5
|
|
117
|
+
# SATISFACTION MAKES FORMS REALIZED
|
|
118
|
+
# ---------------------------------
|
|
119
|
+
|
|
120
|
+
{
|
|
121
|
+
?o :integrates ?form.
|
|
122
|
+
?o :achieves :satisfaction.
|
|
123
|
+
}
|
|
124
|
+
=>
|
|
125
|
+
{
|
|
126
|
+
?o :realizes ?form.
|
|
127
|
+
}.
|
|
128
|
+
|
|
129
|
+
# -----------------------------
|
|
130
|
+
# RULE 6
|
|
131
|
+
# INGRESSION OF PURE POTENTIALS
|
|
132
|
+
# -----------------------------
|
|
133
|
+
|
|
134
|
+
{
|
|
135
|
+
?o :realizes ?form.
|
|
136
|
+
?form a :PurePotential.
|
|
137
|
+
}
|
|
138
|
+
=>
|
|
139
|
+
{
|
|
140
|
+
?o :ingresses ?form.
|
|
141
|
+
}.
|
|
142
|
+
|
|
143
|
+
# ---------------------
|
|
144
|
+
# RULE 7
|
|
145
|
+
# OBJECTIVELY AVAILABLE
|
|
146
|
+
# ---------------------
|
|
147
|
+
|
|
148
|
+
{
|
|
149
|
+
?o :achieves :satisfaction.
|
|
150
|
+
}
|
|
151
|
+
=>
|
|
152
|
+
{
|
|
153
|
+
?o :status :objectivelyAvailable;
|
|
154
|
+
:availableForFuturePrehension :yes.
|
|
155
|
+
}.
|