evrex-mcp 0.2.0 → 0.4.0

package/dist/index.js

@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ async function synthesizeAnswer(question, evidence, client2, options = {}) {
 
 // ../../packages/llm-core/src/providers.ts
 var DEFAULT_MODELS = {
-  anthropic: "claude-opus-5",
+  anthropic: "claude-haiku-4-5",
   openai: "gpt-4o",
   google: "gemini-2.0-flash"
 };
@@ -433,6 +433,12 @@ function toRepoRelative(filePath, root) {
   }
   return filePath;
 }
+function sameFileRef(a, b) {
+  if (a === b) return true;
+  if (a.endsWith(`/${b}`)) return true;
+  if (b.endsWith(`/${a}`)) return true;
+  return false;
+}
 async function resolveRepos() {
   const override = process.env.EVREX_REPO_PATH;
   if (override) {
@@ -458,9 +464,14 @@ async function evrexWhy(filePath, question) {
   const sessions = (await Promise.all(sessionIds.map((id) => evrexApi.session(id)))).filter(
     (s) => s !== null
   );
-  const rejected = sessions.flatMap((s) => s.rejected).slice(0, MAX_ITEMS);
-  const constraints = sessions.flatMap((s) => s.constraints).slice(0, MAX_ITEMS);
-  const decisions = sessions.flatMap((s) => s.decisions).slice(0, MAX_ITEMS);
+  const target = isAbsolute(filePath) ? toRepoRelative(filePath, root) : filePath;
+  const aboutTarget = (item) => (item.files ?? []).some((f) => sameFileRef(toRepoRelative(f, root), target));
+  const byRelevance = (items) => [...items].sort(
+    (a, b) => Number(aboutTarget(b)) - Number(aboutTarget(a))
+  );
+  const rejected = byRelevance(sessions.flatMap((s) => s.rejected)).slice(0, MAX_ITEMS);
+  const constraints = byRelevance(sessions.flatMap((s) => s.constraints)).slice(0, MAX_ITEMS);
+  const decisions = byRelevance(sessions.flatMap((s) => s.decisions)).slice(0, MAX_ITEMS);
   const parts = [];
   const heuristic = sessions.some((s) => s.insightsSource === "heuristic");
   if (rejected.length > 0) {
@@ -479,6 +490,7 @@ async function evrexWhy(filePath, question) {
       "NOTE: the blocks above were extracted by cue-phrase matching, not by a model reading the conversation \u2014 they may be incomplete or miss context."
     );
   }
+  const hasBlocks = rejected.length > 0 || constraints.length > 0 || decisions.length > 0;
   if (synthesisEnabled()) {
     const answer = await synthesize(text, evidence);
     parts.push(
@@ -486,7 +498,7 @@ async function evrexWhy(filePath, question) {
     );
   } else {
     parts.push(
-      "HOW TO USE THIS: treat the constraints and rejected approaches above as binding \u2014 they are what this team already decided, not suggestions. Do not re-propose a rejected approach unless you have new information that specifically invalidates the stated reason, and say so if you do. Answer the user from the evidence below; if it does not actually cover their question, say that rather than inferring."
+      hasBlocks ? "HOW TO USE THIS: treat the constraints and rejected approaches above as binding \u2014 they are what this team already decided, not suggestions. Do not re-propose a rejected approach unless you have new information that specifically invalidates the stated reason, and say so if you do. Answer the user from the evidence below; if it does not actually cover their question, say that rather than inferring." : "HOW TO USE THIS: no decisions, constraints or rejected approaches were extracted for this file \u2014 only the raw evidence below. Treat it as history to read, not as settled policy, and say so if it does not cover the question."
     );
   }
   const evidenceLines = evidence.slice(0, MAX_ITEMS).map((e) => {

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "evrex-mcp",
-  "version": "0.2.0",
+  "version": "0.4.0",
   "description": "MCP server that gives coding agents the recorded reasoning behind a repo: prior decisions, hard constraints, and approaches already rejected.",
   "keywords": [
     "mcp",