eslint-plugin-traceability 1.23.0 → 1.24.0

package/lib/tests/rules/no-redundant-annotation.test.js

@@ -1,163 +0,0 @@
-"use strict";
-var __importDefault = (this && this.__importDefault) || function (mod) {
-    return (mod && mod.__esModule) ? mod : { "default": mod };
-};
-Object.defineProperty(exports, "__esModule", { value: true });
-/**
- * Tests for: docs/stories/027.0-DEV-REDUNDANT-ANNOTATION-DETECTION.story.md
- * @story docs/stories/027.0-DEV-REDUNDANT-ANNOTATION-DETECTION.story.md
- * @req REQ-SCOPE-ANALYSIS - Verify that the rule understands scope coverage for branch and block annotations
- * @req REQ-DUPLICATION-DETECTION - Verify detection of duplicate annotations within the same scope
- * @req REQ-STATEMENT-SIGNIFICANCE - Verify that simple statements are treated as redundant when covered by scope
- * @req REQ-SAFE-REMOVAL - Verify that auto-fix removes only redundant annotations and preserves code
- * @req REQ-DIFFERENT-REQUIREMENTS - Verify that annotations with different requirement IDs are preserved
- * @req REQ-CATCH-BLOCK-HANDLING - Verify that catch block annotations are not incorrectly treated as redundant
- * @supports docs/stories/027.0-DEV-REDUNDANT-ANNOTATION-DETECTION.story.md REQ-SCOPE-ANALYSIS REQ-DUPLICATION-DETECTION REQ-STATEMENT-SIGNIFICANCE REQ-SAFE-REMOVAL REQ-DIFFERENT-REQUIREMENTS REQ-CATCH-BLOCK-HANDLING REQ-SUPPORTS-COVERAGE REQ-SCOPE-INHERITANCE REQ-CONFIGURABLE-STRICTNESS
- */
-const eslint_1 = require("eslint");
-const no_redundant_annotation_1 = __importDefault(require("../../src/rules/no-redundant-annotation"));
-const ruleTester = new eslint_1.RuleTester({
-    languageOptions: { parserOptions: { ecmaVersion: 2020 } },
-});
-const runRule = (tests) => ruleTester.run("no-redundant-annotation", no_redundant_annotation_1.default, tests);
-describe("no-redundant-annotation rule (Story 027.0-DEV-REDUNDANT-ANNOTATION-DETECTION)", () => {
-    runRule({
-        valid: [
-            {
-                name: "[REQ-DIFFERENT-REQUIREMENTS] preserves child annotation with different requirement ID",
-                code: `function example() {\n  // @story docs/stories/002.0-EXAMPLE.story.md\n  // @req REQ-EXAMPLE-PARENT\n  if (flag) {\n    // @story docs/stories/002.0-EXAMPLE.story.md\n    // @req REQ-EXAMPLE-CHILD\n    doWork();\n  }\n}`,
-            },
-            {
-                name: "[REQ-STATEMENT-SIGNIFICANCE] preserves annotation on complex nested branch",
-                code: `function example() {\n  // @story docs/stories/006.0-EXAMPLE.story.md\n  // @req REQ-OUTER-CHECK\n  if (enabled) {\n    // @story docs/stories/006.0-EXAMPLE.story.md\n    // @req REQ-INNER-VALIDATION\n    if (validate) {\n      validate(data);\n    }\n  }\n}`,
-            },
-            {
-                name: "[REQ-SUPPORTS-COVERAGE] preserves non-redundant mixed @supports/@req pairs when only partially covered by scope",
-                code: `function example() {\n  /**\n   * @story docs/stories/010.0-EXAMPLE.story.md\n   * @req REQ-FN-LEVEL\n   * @supports REQ-SHARED\n   */\n  if (flag) {\n    // @story docs/stories/010.0-EXAMPLE.story.md\n    // @req REQ-BRANCH-SPECIFIC\n    // @supports REQ-SHARED\n    doThing();\n  }\n}`,
-            },
-            {
-                name: "[REQ-SCOPE-ANALYSIS] preserves annotations on both branch and statement when they intentionally duplicate each other",
-                code: `function example() {\n  if (condition) { // @story docs/stories/007.0-EXAMPLE.story.md @req REQ-BRANCH\n    // @story docs/stories/007.0-EXAMPLE.story.md\n    // @req REQ-BRANCH\n    doBranchWork();\n  }\n}`,
-            },
-            {
-                name: "[REQ-CATCH-BLOCK-HANDLING] preserves catch block annotation from issue #6 scenario",
-                code: `async function example() {\n  try {\n    // @story prompts/004.0-DEV-FILTER-VULNERABLE-VERSIONS.story.md\n    // @supports prompts/004.0-DEV-FILTER-VULNERABLE-VERSIONS.md REQ-SAFE-ONLY\n    if (isSafeVersion({ version, vulnerabilityData })) {\n      return version;\n    }\n\n    // @story prompts/004.0-DEV-FILTER-VULNERABLE-VERSIONS.story.md\n    // @supports prompts/004.0-DEV-FILTER-VULNERABLE-VERSIONS.md REQ-SAFE-ONLY\n    if (!vulnerabilityData.isVulnerable) {\n      return version;\n    }\n  } catch (error) {\n    // @story prompts/004.0-DEV-FILTER-VULNERABLE-VERSIONS.story.md\n    // @supports prompts/004.0-DEV-FILTER-VULNERABLE-VERSIONS.md REQ-SAFE-ONLY\n    return null;\n  }\n}`,
-            },
-            {
-                name: "[REQ-CATCH-BLOCK-HANDLING] preserves annotations in nested catch blocks with repeated requirements",
-                code: `async function nestedCatches() {\n  try {\n    await checkPrimary();\n  } catch (outerError) {\n    // @supports prompts/004.0-DEV-FILTER-VULNERABLE-VERSIONS.md REQ-SAFE-ONLY\n    try {\n      await attemptRecovery(outerError);\n    } catch (innerError) {\n      // @supports prompts/004.0-DEV-FILTER-VULNERABLE-VERSIONS.md REQ-SAFE-ONLY\n      await reportFailure(innerError);\n    }\n  }\n}`,
-            },
-        ],
-        invalid: [
-            {
-                name: "[REQ-SCOPE-ANALYSIS][REQ-STATEMENT-SIGNIFICANCE] flags redundant annotation on simple return inside annotated if",
-                code: `function example() {
-  // @story docs/stories/004.0-EXAMPLE.story.md
-  // @req REQ-PROCESS
-  if (condition) {
-    /* @story docs/stories/004.0-EXAMPLE.story.md\n     * @req REQ-PROCESS
-     */
-    return value;
-  }
-}`,
-                output: `function example() {
-  // @story docs/stories/004.0-EXAMPLE.story.md
-  // @req REQ-PROCESS
-  if (condition) {
-    return value;
-  }
-}`,
-                errors: [
-                    {
-                        messageId: "redundantAnnotation",
-                    },
-                ],
-            },
-            {
-                name: "[REQ-DUPLICATION-DETECTION] flags redundant annotations on sequential simple statements in same scope",
-                code: `// @story docs/stories/003.0-EXAMPLE.story.md\n// @req REQ-INIT\nfunction init() {\n  // @story docs/stories/003.0-EXAMPLE.story.md\n  // @req REQ-INIT\n  const config = loadConfig();\n  const validator = new Validator(config);\n}`,
-                output: `// @story docs/stories/003.0-EXAMPLE.story.md\n// @req REQ-INIT\nfunction init() {\n  const config = loadConfig();\n  const validator = new Validator(config);\n}`,
-                errors: [{ messageId: "redundantAnnotation" }],
-            },
-            {
-                name: "[REQ-SAFE-REMOVAL] removes full-line redundant comment without touching code on same line above",
-                code: `function example() {\n  const keep = 1;\n  // @story docs/stories/003.0-EXAMPLE.story.md\n  // @req REQ-INIT\n  if (flag) {\n    // @story docs/stories/003.0-EXAMPLE.story.md\n    // @req REQ-INIT\n    const value = 1;\n  }\n}`,
-                output: `function example() {\n  const keep = 1;\n  // @story docs/stories/003.0-EXAMPLE.story.md\n  // @req REQ-INIT\n  if (flag) {\n    const value = 1;\n  }\n}`,
-                errors: [{ messageId: "redundantAnnotation" }],
-            },
-            {
-                name: "[REQ-SCOPE-INHERITANCE] flags redundant statement annotation when scopePairs come from parent function JSDoc",
-                code: `/**\n * @story docs/stories/008.0-EXAMPLE.story.md\n * @req REQ-FUNC\n */\nfunction example() {\n  // @story docs/stories/008.0-EXAMPLE.story.md\n  // @req REQ-FUNC\n  const result = compute();\n}`,
-                output: `/**\n * @story docs/stories/008.0-EXAMPLE.story.md\n * @req REQ-FUNC\n */\nfunction example() {\n  const result = compute();\n}`,
-                errors: [{ messageId: "redundantAnnotation" }],
-            },
-            {
-                name: "[REQ-SUPPORTS-COVERAGE][REQ-DUPLICATION-DETECTION] flags redundant statement with multiple fully-covered @supports pairs",
-                code: `/**\n * @story docs/stories/009.0-EXAMPLE.story.md\n * @supports REQ-SUP-A, REQ-SUP-B\n */\nfunction example() {\n  // @story docs/stories/009.0-EXAMPLE.story.md\n  // @supports REQ-SUP-A, REQ-SUP-B\n  const supported = checkSupport();\n}`,
-                output: `/**\n * @story docs/stories/009.0-EXAMPLE.story.md\n * @supports REQ-SUP-A, REQ-SUP-B\n */\nfunction example() {\n  const supported = checkSupport();\n}`,
-                errors: [{ messageId: "redundantAnnotation" }],
-            },
-            {
-                name: "[REQ-SCOPE-ANALYSIS][REQ-STATEMENT-SIGNIFICANCE] flags redundant annotation in finally block that repeats try-path coverage",
-                code: `async function example() {\n  // @supports docs/stories/010.0-EXAMPLE.story.md REQ-SAFE-OPERATION\n  try {\n    await doWork();\n  } finally {\n    // @supports docs/stories/010.0-EXAMPLE.story.md REQ-SAFE-OPERATION\n    await cleanUp();\n  }\n}`,
-                output: `async function example() {\n  // @supports docs/stories/010.0-EXAMPLE.story.md REQ-SAFE-OPERATION\n  try {\n    await doWork();\n  } finally {\n    await cleanUp();\n  }\n}`,
-                errors: [{ messageId: "redundantAnnotation" }],
-            },
-            // TODO: rule implementation exists; full invalid-case behavior tests pending refinement
-            // {
-            //   name: "[REQ-SCOPE-ANALYSIS][REQ-STATEMENT-SIGNIFICANCE] flags redundant annotation on simple return inside annotated if",
-            //   code: `function example() {\n  // @story docs/stories/004.0-EXAMPLE.story.md\n  // @req REQ-PROCESS\n  if (condition) {\n    // @req REQ-PROCESS\n    return value;\n  }\n}`,
-            //   output: `function example() {\n  // @story docs/stories/004.0-EXAMPLE.story.md\n  // @req REQ-PROCESS\n  if (condition) {\n    return value;\n  }\n}`,
-            //   errors: [
-            //     {
-            //       messageId: "redundantAnnotation",
-            //     },
-            //   ],
-            // },
-            // {
-            //   name: "[REQ-DUPLICATION-DETECTION] flags redundant annotations on sequential simple statements in same scope",
-            //   code: `// @story docs/stories/003.0-EXAMPLE.story.md\n// @req REQ-INIT\nfunction init() {\n  // @req REQ-INIT\n  const config = loadConfig();\n  const validator = new Validator(config);\n}`,
-            //   output: `// @story docs/stories/003.0-EXAMPLE.story.md\n// @req REQ-INIT\nfunction init() {\n  const config = loadConfig();\n  const validator = new Validator(config);\n}`,
-            //   errors: [
-            //     { messageId: "redundantAnnotation" },
-            //   ],
-            // },
-            // {
-            //   name: "[REQ-SAFE-REMOVAL] removes full-line redundant comment without touching code on same line above",
-            //   code: `function example() {\n  const keep = 1;\n  // @story docs/stories/003.0-EXAMPLE.story.md\n  // @req REQ-INIT\n  if (flag) {\n    // @req REQ-INIT\n    const value = 1;\n  }\n}`,
-            //   output: `function example() {\n  const keep = 1;\n  // @story docs/stories/003.0-EXAMPLE.story.md\n  // @req REQ-INIT\n  if (flag) {\n    const value = 1;\n  }\n}`,
-            //   errors: [
-            //     { messageId: "redundantAnnotation" },
-            //   ],
-            // },
-        ],
-    });
-    runRule({
-        valid: [
-            {
-                name: "[REQ-CONFIGURABLE-STRICTNESS] permissive mode does not flag expression statements as redundant",
-                options: [{ strictness: "permissive" }],
-                code: `function example() {\n  // @story docs/stories/004.0-EXAMPLE.story.md\n  // @req REQ-PROCESS\n  if (condition) {\n    // @story docs/stories/004.0-EXAMPLE.story.md\n    // @req REQ-PROCESS\n    doSomething();\n  }\n}`,
-            },
-            {
-                name: "[REQ-CONFIGURABLE-STRICTNESS] allowEmphasisDuplication skips single covered pair",
-                options: [{ allowEmphasisDuplication: true }],
-                code: `function example() {\n  // @story docs/stories/004.0-EXAMPLE.story.md\n  // @req REQ-PROCESS\n  if (condition) {\n    // @story docs/stories/004.0-EXAMPLE.story.md\n    // @req REQ-PROCESS\n    return value;\n  }\n}`,
-            },
-            {
-                name: "[REQ-SCOPE-INHERITANCE] maxScopeDepth=1 does not treat grandparent function annotations as covering nested block",
-                options: [{ maxScopeDepth: 1 }],
-                code: `/**\n * @story docs/stories/004.0-EXAMPLE.story.md\n * @req REQ-PROCESS\n */\nfunction example() {\n  if (outer) {\n    {\n      // @story docs/stories/004.0-EXAMPLE.story.md\n      // @req REQ-PROCESS\n      const value = compute();\n    }\n  }\n}`,
-            },
-        ],
-        invalid: [
-            {
-                name: "[REQ-SCOPE-INHERITANCE] maxScopeDepth>1 treats function-level annotations as covering nested block statements",
-                options: [{ maxScopeDepth: 4 }],
-                code: `/**\n * @story docs/stories/004.0-EXAMPLE.story.md\n * @req REQ-PROCESS\n */\nfunction example() {\n  if (outer) {\n    {\n      // @story docs/stories/004.0-EXAMPLE.story.md\n      // @req REQ-PROCESS\n      const value = compute();\n    }\n  }\n}`,
-                output: `/**\n * @story docs/stories/004.0-EXAMPLE.story.md\n * @req REQ-PROCESS\n */\nfunction example() {\n  if (outer) {\n    {\n      const value = compute();\n    }\n  }\n}`,
-                errors: [{ messageId: "redundantAnnotation" }],
-            },
-        ],
-    });
-});

package/lib/tests/rules/prefer-implements-annotation.test.d.ts

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-export {};

package/lib/tests/rules/prefer-implements-annotation.test.js

@@ -1,162 +0,0 @@
-"use strict";
-var __importDefault = (this && this.__importDefault) || function (mod) {
-    return (mod && mod.__esModule) ? mod : { "default": mod };
-};
-Object.defineProperty(exports, "__esModule", { value: true });
-/**
- * Tests for: docs/stories/010.3-DEV-MIGRATE-TO-SUPPORTS.story.md
- * @story docs/stories/010.3-DEV-MIGRATE-TO-SUPPORTS.story.md
- * @req REQ-OPTIONAL-WARNING - Verify rule emits recommendations for legacy @story/@req usage and migration to @supports
- * @req REQ-MULTI-STORY-DETECT - Verify rule detects multi-story and mixed-annotation patterns involving @supports
- * @req REQ-CONFIG-SEVERITY - Verify rule is disabled by default and can be enabled as warn/error
- */
-const eslint_1 = require("eslint");
-const prefer_implements_annotation_1 = __importDefault(require("../../src/rules/prefer-implements-annotation"));
-const src_1 = require("../../src");
-const ruleTester = new eslint_1.RuleTester({
-    languageOptions: {
-        parserOptions: { ecmaVersion: 2020, sourceType: "module" },
-    },
-});
-describe("prefer-supports-annotation / prefer-implements-annotation aliasing (Story 010.3-DEV-MIGRATE-TO-SUPPORTS)", () => {
-    const valid = [
-        {
-            name: "[REQ-BACKWARD-COMP-VALIDATION] comment with only @story is ignored",
-            code: `/**\n * @story docs/stories/003.0-DEV-FUNCTION-ANNOTATIONS.story.md\n */\nfunction onlyStory() {}`,
-        },
-        {
-            name: "[REQ-BACKWARD-COMP-VALIDATION] comment with only @req is ignored",
-            code: `/**\n * @req REQ-ONLY\n */\nfunction onlyReq() {}`,
-        },
-        {
-            name: "[REQ-BACKWARD-COMP-VALIDATION] comment with @supports only is ignored",
-            code: `/**\n * @supports docs/stories/003.0-DEV-FUNCTION-ANNOTATIONS.story.md REQ-ANNOTATION-REQUIRED\n */\nfunction alreadyImplements() {}`,
-        },
-        {
-            name: "[REQ-BACKWARD-COMP-VALIDATION] comment with @story and @supports but no @req is ignored",
-            code: `/**\n * @story docs/stories/003.0-DEV-FUNCTION-ANNOTATIONS.story.md\n * @supports docs/stories/003.0-DEV-FUNCTION-ANNOTATIONS.story.md REQ-ANNOTATION-REQUIRED\n */\nfunction storyAndSupportsNoReq() {}`,
-        },
-        {
-            name: "[REQ-BACKWARD-COMP-VALIDATION] comment with @req and @supports but no @story is ignored",
-            code: `/**\n * @req REQ-ANNOTATION-REQUIRED\n * @supports docs/stories/003.0-DEV-FUNCTION-ANNOTATIONS.story.md REQ-ANNOTATION-REQUIRED\n */\nfunction reqAndSupportsNoStory() {}`,
-        },
-    ];
-    const invalid = [
-        {
-            name: "[REQ-OPTIONAL-WARNING] single-story @story + @req block triggers preferImplements message",
-            code: `/**\n * @story docs/stories/003.0-DEV-FUNCTION-ANNOTATIONS.story.md\n * @req REQ-ANNOTATION-REQUIRED\n */\nfunction legacy() {}`,
-            output: `/**\n * @supports docs/stories/003.0-DEV-FUNCTION-ANNOTATIONS.story.md REQ-ANNOTATION-REQUIRED\n */\nfunction legacy() {}`,
-            errors: [{ messageId: "preferImplements" }],
-        },
-        {
-            name: "[REQ-MULTI-STORY-DETECT] mixed @story/@req and @supports triggers cannotAutoFix",
-            code: `/**\n * @story docs/stories/003.0-DEV-FUNCTION-ANNOTATIONS.story.md\n * @req REQ-ANNOTATION-REQUIRED\n * @supports docs/stories/003.0-DEV-FUNCTION-ANNOTATIONS.story.md REQ-ANNOTATION-REQUIRED\n */\nfunction mixed() {}`,
-            errors: [
-                {
-                    messageId: "cannotAutoFix",
-                    data: {
-                        reason: "comment mixes @story/@req with existing @supports annotations",
-                    },
-                },
-            ],
-        },
-        {
-            name: "[REQ-MULTI-STORY-DETECT] multiple @story paths in same block trigger multiStoryDetected",
-            code: `/**\n * @story docs/stories/003.0-DEV-FUNCTION-ANNOTATIONS.story.md\n * @req REQ-ANNOTATION-REQUIRED\n * @story docs/stories/004.0-DEV-BRANCH-ANNOTATIONS.story.md\n * @req REQ-BRANCH-DETECTION\n */\nfunction multiStory() {}`,
-            errors: [{ messageId: "multiStoryDetected" }],
-        },
-        {
-            name: "[REQ-AUTO-FIX] single @story + single @req auto-fixes to single @supports line",
-            code: `/**\n * @story docs/stories/003.0-DEV-FUNCTION-ANNOTATIONS.story.md\n * @req REQ-ANNOTATION-REQUIRED\n */\nfunction autoFixSingleReq() {}`,
-            output: `/**\n * @supports docs/stories/003.0-DEV-FUNCTION-ANNOTATIONS.story.md REQ-ANNOTATION-REQUIRED\n */\nfunction autoFixSingleReq() {}`,
-            errors: [{ messageId: "preferImplements" }],
-        },
-        {
-            name: "[REQ-SINGLE-STORY-FIX] single @story with multiple @req lines auto-fixes to single @supports line containing all REQ IDs",
-            code: `/**\n * @story docs/stories/003.0-DEV-FUNCTION-ANNOTATIONS.story.md\n * @req REQ-ONE\n * @req REQ-TWO\n * @req REQ-THREE\n */\nfunction autoFixMultiReq() {}`,
-            output: `/**\n * @supports docs/stories/003.0-DEV-FUNCTION-ANNOTATIONS.story.md REQ-ONE REQ-TWO REQ-THREE\n */\nfunction autoFixMultiReq() {}`,
-            errors: [{ messageId: "preferImplements" }],
-        },
-        {
-            name: "[REQ-AUTO-FIX] complex @req content (extra description) does not auto-fix but still warns",
-            code: `/**\n * @story docs/stories/003.0-DEV-FUNCTION-ANNOTATIONS.story.md\n * @req REQ-ANNOTATION-REQUIRED must handle extra description\n */\nfunction complexReqNoAutoFix() {}`,
-            errors: [{ messageId: "preferImplements" }],
-        },
-        {
-            name: "[REQ-AUTO-FIX] complex @story content (extra description) does not auto-fix but still warns",
-            code: `/**\n * @story docs/stories/003.0-DEV-FUNCTION-ANNOTATIONS.story.md additional descriptive text\n * @req REQ-ANNOTATION-REQUIRED\n */\nfunction complexStoryNoAutoFix() {}`,
-            errors: [{ messageId: "preferImplements" }],
-        },
-        {
-            name: "[REQ-INLINE-COMMENT-SUPPORT] single inline // @story + // @req auto-fixes to single // @supports line above function",
-            code: `// @story docs/stories/010.3-DEV-MIGRATE-TO-SUPPORTS.story.md\n// @req REQ-INLINE-COMMENT-SUPPORT\nfunction inlineLegacy() {}`,
-            output: `// @supports docs/stories/010.3-DEV-MIGRATE-TO-SUPPORTS.story.md REQ-INLINE-COMMENT-SUPPORT\nfunction inlineLegacy() {}`,
-            errors: [{ messageId: "preferImplements" }],
-        },
-        {
-            name: "[REQ-INLINE-COMMENT-SUPPORT] single inline // @story with multiple // @req lines auto-fixes to single // @supports containing all REQ IDs",
-            code: `// @story docs/stories/010.3-DEV-MIGRATE-TO-SUPPORTS.story.md\n// @req REQ-INLINE-COMMENT-SUPPORT\n// @req REQ-BRANCH-POSITION-PRESERVE\nfunction inlineMultiReq() {}`,
-            output: `// @supports docs/stories/010.3-DEV-MIGRATE-TO-SUPPORTS.story.md REQ-INLINE-COMMENT-SUPPORT REQ-BRANCH-POSITION-PRESERVE\nfunction inlineMultiReq() {}`,
-            errors: [{ messageId: "preferImplements" }],
-        },
-        {
-            name: "[REQ-INLINE-COMMENT-SUPPORT] inline // @story + // @req above statement is auto-fixed preserving branch position (REQ-BRANCH-POSITION-PRESERVE)",
-            code: `if (flag) {\n  // @story docs/stories/010.3-DEV-MIGRATE-TO-SUPPORTS.story.md\n  // @req REQ-BRANCH-POSITION-PRESERVE\n  doSomething();\n}`,
-            output: `if (flag) {\n  // @supports docs/stories/010.3-DEV-MIGRATE-TO-SUPPORTS.story.md REQ-BRANCH-POSITION-PRESERVE\n  doSomething();\n}`,
-            errors: [{ messageId: "preferImplements" }],
-        },
-        {
-            name: "[REQ-INLINE-COMMENT-SUPPORT] complex inline // @req content is not safely auto-fixable but still reports preferImplements",
-            code: `// @story docs/stories/010.3-DEV-MIGRATE-TO-SUPPORTS.story.md\n// @req REQ-INLINE-COMMENT-SUPPORT extra description inline\nfunction inlineComplexReqNoAutoFix() {}`,
-            errors: [{ messageId: "preferImplements" }],
-        },
-    ];
-    ruleTester.run("prefer-implements-annotation", prefer_implements_annotation_1.default, {
-        valid,
-        invalid,
-    });
-    ruleTester.run("prefer-supports-annotation", prefer_implements_annotation_1.default, {
-        valid,
-        invalid,
-    });
-});
-describe("prefer-implements-annotation configuration severity (REQ-CONFIG-SEVERITY)", () => {
-    // Story 010.3 / REQ-RULE-NAME: verify aliasing semantics for new primary rule name and deprecated alias
-    test("rule is disabled by default in recommended and strict presets (not present in preset rule maps)", () => {
-        const recommended = src_1.configs.recommended;
-        expect(Array.isArray(recommended)).toBe(true);
-        const firstConfig = recommended[0];
-        expect(firstConfig).toBeDefined();
-        const rules = firstConfig.rules || {};
-        expect(rules["traceability/prefer-implements-annotation"]).toBeUndefined();
-        expect(rules["traceability/prefer-supports-annotation"]).toBeUndefined();
-        const strict = src_1.configs.strict;
-        expect(Array.isArray(strict)).toBe(true);
-        const strictFirstConfig = strict[0];
-        expect(strictFirstConfig).toBeDefined();
-        const strictRules = strictFirstConfig.rules || {};
-        expect(strictRules["traceability/prefer-implements-annotation"]).toBeUndefined();
-        expect(strictRules["traceability/prefer-supports-annotation"]).toBeUndefined();
-    });
-    test("rule can be configured with severity 'warn' or 'error' in flat config", () => {
-        // Story 010.3 / REQ-RULE-NAME: both primary and alias rule keys must be accepted in flat config
-        const flatWarnConfig = {
-            files: ["**/*.ts"],
-            rules: {
-                "traceability/prefer-implements-annotation": "warn",
-                "traceability/prefer-supports-annotation": "warn",
-            },
-        };
-        expect(flatWarnConfig.rules["traceability/prefer-implements-annotation"]).toBe("warn");
-        expect(flatWarnConfig.rules["traceability/prefer-supports-annotation"]).toBe("warn");
-        const flatErrorConfig = {
-            files: ["**/*.ts"],
-            rules: {
-                "traceability/prefer-implements-annotation": "error",
-                "traceability/prefer-supports-annotation": "error",
-            },
-        };
-        expect(flatErrorConfig.rules["traceability/prefer-implements-annotation"]).toBe("error");
-        expect(flatErrorConfig.rules["traceability/prefer-supports-annotation"]).toBe("error");
-    });
-});

package/lib/tests/rules/require-branch-annotation.test.d.ts

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-export {};