eslint-plugin-traceability 1.0.3 → 1.0.5

package/.voder/implementation-progress.md

@@ -1,146 +1,144 @@
 # Implementation Progress Assessment
 
-**Generated:** 2025-11-16T22:52:12.274Z
+**Generated:** 2025-11-17T01:14:56.844Z
 
 ![Progress Chart](./progress-chart.png)
 
-Projected completion (from current rate): cycle 41.2
+Projection: flat (no recent upward trend)
 
-## IMPLEMENTATION STATUS: INCOMPLETE (91% ± 10% COMPLETE)
+## IMPLEMENTATION STATUS: INCOMPLETE (75.25% ± 5% COMPLETE)
 
 ## OVERALL ASSESSMENT
-Overall status is INCOMPLETE due to Testing (87%) and Version Control (85%) scores below the required 90% threshold, and an unassessed Functionality area. All other areas meet or exceed expectations.
+Overall status is INCOMPLETE due to Code Quality (85%), Execution (85%), and Version Control (55%) falling below the 90% threshold required. Functionality assessment remains skipped until these foundational areas improve. Focus on remediation of these support areas before further functionality work.
 
 ## NEXT PRIORITY
-Improve testing to at least 90% (consistent JSDoc structure, GIVEN-WHEN-THEN clarity) and elevate version control to 90% by aligning hooks and adding post-deployment verification, then reassess functionality.
+Implement true automated publishing and artifact tracking in the CI/CD pipeline to satisfy continuous deployment requirements and raise the Version Control score above 90%.
 
 
 
-## CODE_QUALITY ASSESSMENT (93% ± 17% COMPLETE)
-- The codebase exhibits strong quality: linting, formatting, type‐checking, tests, duplication and complexity checks all pass with no errors. Quality tools are properly configured and enforced both locally and in CI, and there are no disabled checks or technical‐debt suppressions. Function and file sizes remain within configured limits, and traceability annotations are consistently applied.
-- ESLint flat config applied with complexity and max‐lines rules, and no lint errors or warnings.
-- Prettier formatting passes on all files (format:check reports 0 issues).
-- TypeScript type‐checking (tsc --noEmit) completes with no errors.
-- Jest tests pass (100+ tests) with coverage ≥96% across statements, branches, functions, and lines.
-- jscpd duplication scan reports 0 clones (0% duplication).
-- No @ts-ignore or eslint-disable suppressions found in src.
-- Cyclomatic complexity rule enforced at default threshold (20) with no violations.
-- File length (<400 lines) and function length (<90 lines) rules enforced with no breaches.
-- CI/CD pipeline integrates build, lint, type‐check, duplication, test, format, audit, and publish steps in a single workflow.
-- Traceability plugin tests and basic integration CLI script exercise core functionality.
+## CODE_QUALITY ASSESSMENT (85% ± 15% COMPLETE)
+- The codebase has excellent tooling in place—linting, formatting, type-checking, duplication and complexity rules are all configured and passing with no violations. Tests are comprehensive (96%+ coverage), there are no disabled checks or test logic in production, and files/functions stay within the configured size/complexity limits.
+- ESLint (`npm run lint`) passes with zero errors or warnings
+- Prettier formatting check passes for the entire repo
+- TypeScript type-check (`tsc --noEmit`) passes with no errors
+- Jest tests all pass; overall coverage is 96%+ with no critical gaps
+- jscpd duplication check reports 0% duplication (threshold 3%)
+- No `@ts-nocheck`, `eslint-disable`, or inline suppressions found in source files
+- Cyclomatic complexity rule is enforced (default max 20) and no functions exceed the limit
+- Max-lines-per-function is set to 80 and all functions are under that threshold
+- Max-lines-per-file is set to 350 and no source file exceeds this
+- No magic numbers or hard-coded strings detected in core logic
+- Clean project structure with no temporary or patch files in source
+- Husky pre-commit and pre-push hooks enforce build, lint, test, duplication, and audit checks
 
 **Next Steps:**
-- Evaluate lowering max‐lines‐per‐function threshold (e.g. toward 50) and plan incremental ratcheting to enforce more granular functions.
-- Introduce a complexity ratcheting plan if more stringent cyclomatic limits are desired (e.g. gradual reduction toward 15).
-- Add automated reporting/metrics to track average function size and complexity over time.
-- Consider integrating vulnerability scanning (e.g. Snyk) alongside npm audit in CI.
-- Periodically review and update dependency versions to address deprecation and security warnings.
-
-## TESTING ASSESSMENT (87% ± 15% COMPLETE)
-- The project has a mature testing setup using Jest, with 100% passing tests, non-interactive execution, proper use of temporary directories, and solid coverage that exceeds thresholds. Tests are well-named, isolated, and largely traceable to stories and requirements. Minor issues include inconsistent JSDoc headers in some rule tests, small bits of logic in tests, and lacking explicit GIVEN-WHEN-THEN structure.
-- All tests pass in non-interactive mode with jest --ci --bail --coverage
-- Jest is an established framework; test configuration in jest.config.js is correct
-- Global coverage (96.7% statements, 85.6% branches) exceeds configured thresholds
-- Maintenance tests use os.tmpdir() and clean up temp dirs; no repository files are modified
-- Tests include @story and @req annotations for traceability; most files use JSDoc headers
-- Test file names accurately describe their content and avoid coverage terminology
-- Integration tests invoke ESLint CLI correctly and assert exit codes and outputs
-- Minor logic appears in tests (array sorting, flatMap); could be simplified
-- Rule tests use line comments for @story/@req instead of JSDoc block headers
-- Tests don’t follow explicit GIVEN-WHEN-THEN separators but are structured with describe/it
+- Consider lowering max-lines-per-function from 80 to 60 (or 50) over time via incremental ratcheting
+- Introduce an explicit complexity-ratchet plan: gradually reduce ESLint complexity threshold and refactor failing functions
+- Monitor file and function sizes as new features are added and enforce stricter limits when practical
+- Periodically review jscpd threshold and re-enable duplication checks at a higher strictness as the code grows
+- Continue to maintain 100% tooling pass rate—add new rules only after incremental, passing fixes
+
+## TESTING ASSESSMENT (95% ± 15% COMPLETE)
+- The project’s testing infrastructure is robust: it uses Jest (an established framework), all tests pass in non-interactive CI mode, and coverage exceeds configured thresholds. Tests are well–structured, isolated, and include complete traceability via @story and @req annotations. There are no failing tests, repository files are not modified, and temporary resources are properly managed.
+- Test framework: Jest is used consistently across unit, integration, and maintenance tests.
+- All tests pass (100% success) with non-interactive invocation (`jest --ci --bail --coverage`).
+- Coverage is high (96.34% statements, 85.6% branches) and exceeds configured thresholds.
+- Tests use os.tmpdir/mkdtempSync and clean up in afterAll/try-finally, so no repository pollution.
+- Every test file includes a JSDoc @story annotation and describe/test names reference the corresponding stories/reqs.
+- Tests follow ARRANGE-ACT-ASSERT structure and have clear, descriptive names.
+- No complex logic in tests (no loops/ifs), fixtures are static, and tests are independent and deterministic.
 
 **Next Steps:**
-- Convert rule test headers to JSDoc block comments with @story/@req to match traceability standard
-- Remove or minimize custom logic in tests (flatMap, sort) or replace with explicit expected arrays
-- Adopt GIVEN-WHEN-THEN or ARRANGE-ACT-ASSERT comments or naming to improve clarity
-- Add any missing edge case tests for uncovered lines in maintenance batch and update utils
-- Monitor unit test execution times to ensure they remain fast (<100ms each)
-
-## EXECUTION ASSESSMENT (95% ± 14% COMPLETE)
-- The project demonstrates a solid execution setup: build, type‐checking, linting, formatting, duplication scans, unit and integration tests (including CLI/E2E tests) all pass and are enforced in CI. The ESLint plugin runs correctly and behaves as expected in its target environment.
-- Build process (`npm run build`) completes without errors
-- Type-checking (`npm run type-check`), linting (`npm run lint --max-warnings=0`), formatting (`npm run format:check`), and duplication checks all pass
-- Unit tests achieve >96% coverage and all tests (including E2E/CLI integration tests) pass
-- CI/CD workflow runs quality checks on push to main and automatically publishes on successful completion
-- No critical runtime errors, silent failures or code duplication detected
+- Add tests for any newly implemented stories (e.g., error reporting, auto-fix, deep validation) once features are available.
+- Consider adding smoke/end-to-end tests to cover the full CLI workflow beyond unit/integration rule tests.
+- Periodically review branch coverage gaps (currently ~85.6%) and add targeted tests for uncovered branches in maintenance and rule modules.
+- Ensure new tests continue to include @story/@req annotations for traceability and follow the existing naming conventions.
+
+## EXECUTION ASSESSMENT (85% ± 9% COMPLETE)
+- The project’s build and test pipeline is solid and reliable, but its continuous deployment is incomplete (only a dry-run) and there’s no real publishing step. Runtime behaviour for implemented functionality is validated via unit tests and a smoke test, but true end-to-end deployment to npm is not happening.
+- Build process succeeds (`npm run build` and `npm run type-check`)
+- Linting (with max-warnings=0) and duplication checks pass cleanly
+- Jest tests achieve >96% line coverage and smoke test via `npm pack`+`eslint --print-config` confirms basic runtime integration
+- CI/CD pipeline runs all quality checks on push to main and even packs the plugin for smoke testing
+- Publish job is configured only as a dry run (`npm publish --dry-run`), so no actual deployment occurs
 
 **Next Steps:**
-- Add a post-publish smoke test to install and verify the published npm package
-- Introduce lightweight performance benchmarks to measure plugin runtime impact
-- Consider automating a sample-project integration test to validate real-world usage
-
-## DOCUMENTATION ASSESSMENT (85% ± 16% COMPLETE)
-- The project’s user-facing documentation is well organized, up-to-date, and includes the required attribution, installation instructions, usage examples, API reference, and changelog.  A minor inconsistency between the set of rules listed in the README vs. the full API reference and the placement of configuration docs outside of the user-docs folder prevent a perfect score.
-- README.md includes an “Attribution” section with “Created autonomously by voder.ai” linking to https://voder.ai (meets the absolute requirement).
-- README installation and usage instructions are clear and accurate.  It links to the ESLint v9 setup guide (docs/eslint-9-setup-guide.md) which exists.
-- README provides a Quick Start and points to user-docs/api-reference.md and user-docs/examples.md which both contain runnable examples and complete API listings.
-- CHANGELOG.md is present, current, and documents recent changes (1.0.1 and 1.0.0).
-- user-docs/api-reference.md and user-docs/examples.md both begin with the required attribution and cover the plugin’s functionality and usage.
-- Minor inconsistency: README ‘Available Rules’ section lists only the three core annotation rules, while the API reference enumerates six rules (valid-annotation-format, valid-story-reference, valid-req-reference are omitted from the README’s rule list).
-- Configuration presets documentation lives under docs/config-presets.md (outside user-docs), so user-facing config docs are split between folders.
+- Configure NPM_TOKEN secret and remove `--dry-run` to enable real publishing
+- Extend smoke test to install plugin directly from npm after publishing
+- Consider adding integration tests that exercise specific ESLint rules at runtime
+- Monitor and fix any publishing or install-time failures in post-deployment smoke tests
+- If desired, add performance/resource benchmarks for rule execution on large codebases
+
+## DOCUMENTATION ASSESSMENT (92% ± 15% COMPLETE)
+- Comprehensive, accurate, and up-to-date user-facing documentation with full attribution and examples. All implemented rules are documented in user-docs, the README and CHANGELOG are current. Minor boundary nuance: setup guide resides outside user-docs.
+- README.md includes required Attribution section with link to https://voder.ai
+- user-docs/api-reference.md, examples.md, and migration-guide.md all include attribution and cover API, examples, and upgrade steps
+- CHANGELOG.md is present and aligns with package version and dates
+- README installation, usage, and testing instructions accurately reflect existing functionality and scripts
+- API reference lists all public rules matching code exports, with examples
+- Usage examples are runnable and documented in user-docs/examples.md
+- Migration guide covers v0.x→v1.x changes, matching code and scripts
+- README points to docs/eslint-9-setup-guide.md for detailed setup, but that file lives under docs/ rather than user-docs/, blurring user/dev docs separation
 
 **Next Steps:**
-- Update README.md ‘Available Rules’ section to list all six rules or clearly link to the full API reference.
-- Move or duplicate configuration presets documentation into user-docs/ (e.g. user-docs/configuration.md) so all end-user docs are collocated.
-- Consider adding a brief migration guide or troubleshooting section under user-docs to aid users upgrading between versions.
-- Periodically verify that user-facing docs (in README.md and user-docs/) remain synchronized with actual implemented rules in the plugin.
-
-## DEPENDENCIES ASSESSMENT (100% ± 17% COMPLETE)
-- All dependencies are current, lockfile is committed, installation is clean, and there are no deprecation or security warnings.
-- `npx dry-aged-deps` reports all dependencies are up to date.
-- package-lock.json is present and tracked in git.
-- `npm install` completed with no deprecation warnings.
-- `npm audit` reports zero vulnerabilities.
-- Peer dependency `eslint@^9.0.0` is satisfied by installed eslint@9.39.1.
+- Consider relocating ESLint setup guide (docs/eslint-9-setup-guide.md) into user-docs/ or clearly delineating user-facing vs internal docs
+- Add an index or Table of Contents in user-docs/ for improved discoverability
+- Include a troubleshooting or FAQ section in user-docs for common user issues
+- Regularly review docs/decisions and docs/stories to ensure any user-facing changes are reflected in user-docs
+
+## DEPENDENCIES ASSESSMENT (95% ± 17% COMPLETE)
+- Dependencies are current, secure, and properly managed with a committed lockfile. No mature-safe updates available, no deprecation warnings, and zero audit findings.
+- npx dry-aged-deps reported “All dependencies are up to date.” – no safe upgrade candidates.
+- package-lock.json is present and tracked in git (verified via `git ls-files`).
+- `npm install` ran cleanly with no deprecation warnings and zero vulnerabilities.
+- `npm audit --audit-level=low` found 0 vulnerabilities.
+- All tests passed after installation, demonstrating compatibility and no dependency conflicts.
 
 **Next Steps:**
-- Continue to run `npx dry-aged-deps` regularly to catch new safe upgrade candidates.
-- Monitor for deprecation warnings on new dependency additions.
-- Keep using the committed lockfile to ensure reproducible installs.
-- Review dependencies periodically in your CI pipeline to detect emerging issues.
-
-## SECURITY ASSESSMENT (95% ± 15% COMPLETE)
-- The project demonstrates a strong security posture: no active vulnerabilities, proper secret management, secure CI/CD pipeline, and no conflicting automation. A minor adjustment to audit thresholds would further strengthen compliance.
-- npm audit reports zero vulnerabilities across all severity levels
-- Override for js-yaml (>=4.1.1) ensures prototype-pollution fix remains in place
-- .env is untracked (git ls-files empty), listed in .gitignore, never in history, and .env.example contains only placeholders
-- No hard-coded API keys, tokens, or credentials found in source code
-- No Dependabot, Renovate, or other automated update tools detected—manual dependency management only
-- CI/CD workflow runs quality gates and `npm audit --audit-level=high` in one pipeline and auto-publishes on push to main without manual approval
+- Integrate `npx dry-aged-deps` into the CI pipeline to automatically flag safe updates on merge.
+- Schedule periodic dependency audits (e.g., monthly) to ensure ongoing currency and security.
+- Continue to monitor for deprecation warnings and new vulnerabilities as part of routine maintenance.
+
+## SECURITY ASSESSMENT (95% ± 18% COMPLETE)
+- The project demonstrates a strong security posture with no active vulnerabilities, proper secret handling, integrated security audits in CI, and no conflicting automation tools.
+- No moderate or higher vulnerabilities detected (npm audit reports zero issues)
+- Existing js-yaml prototype pollution vulnerability was upgraded via an override and is no longer present
+- Environment variables are managed securely: .env is untracked, listed in .gitignore, and only a safe .env.example is committed
+- CI/CD pipeline includes `npm audit --audit-level=high` and other quality checks
+- No Dependabot or Renovate configuration found, avoiding conflicting dependency automation
 
 **Next Steps:**
-- Update CI audit step to `npm audit --audit-level=moderate` to catch moderate-severity issues per policy
-- Establish a weekly automated scan or dashboard to monitor new vulnerabilities
-- Document any accepted residual risks within 14 days using the formal security-incident template
-
-## VERSION_CONTROL ASSESSMENT (85% ± 17% COMPLETE)
-- Version control and CI/CD are well-configured with trunk-based development, modern hooks, and automated publishing. There is a minor hooks-to-pipeline parity gap and no post-deployment verification.
-- Working directory is clean (only .voder changes) and on main branch
-- .voder/ is not in .gitignore and is being tracked
-- Single unified GitHub Actions workflow runs quality gates and an automated npm publish on every push to main
-- Actions/checkout@v4 and actions/setup-node@v4 are used—no deprecated actions or syntax detected
-- Comprehensive quality checks in CI: build, type-check, lint, duplication, tests, format check, security audit
-- Husky v9 directory-based hooks present: pre-commit runs format+lint; pre-push runs build, type-check, lint, duplication, tests, format-check, audit, and cli integration
-- Pre-commit hook meets requirements (formatting + lint); pre-push hook covers comprehensive checks
-- Pipeline does not run the cli-integration.js step that pre-push hook runs (hook/pipeline parity discrepancy)
-- No post-deployment or post-publish smoke tests or verification steps in CI/CD (medium-severity)
+- Continue regular automated vulnerability scans and monitoring for new advisories
+- Establish a weekly patch check and 14-day review process for any overrides (e.g., js-yaml)
+- Consider lowering the audit threshold to include moderate vulnerabilities in CI
+- Maintain incident documentation discipline for any future accepted residual risks
+
+## VERSION_CONTROL ASSESSMENT (55% ± 12% COMPLETE)
+- Strong CI/CD and local hooks setup with comprehensive quality gates, but critical gaps in automated publishing and artifact tracking undermine continuous deployment and repository health.
+- CI/CD workflow uses npm publish --dry-run only; no actual automated publishing to npm registry
+- Built artifacts (lib/**/*.js, lib/**/*.d.ts) are committed in version control despite .gitignore entries, violating best practices
+- Single workflow file with up-to-date GitHub Action versions and no deprecation warnings
+- Pre-commit and pre-push husky hooks configured correctly, running formatting, lint, type-check and full build/test pipeline locally
+- Repository on main branch with clean working directory (excluding .voder), and .voder/ directory is not ignored
+- Smoke-test job in pipeline verifies packaged plugin, and security audit and duplication checks are in place
 
 **Next Steps:**
-- Add a post-deployment smoke test or package validation step in the CI/CD workflow
-- Incorporate the cli-integration.js script into the GitHub Actions ‘quality-checks’ job to match the pre-push hook
-- Optionally collapse build steps to avoid duplication between quality-checks and publish jobs
-- Implement post-publish health checks or automated validation of the published npm package
+- Remove committed build artifacts (lib/) from repository and ensure they’re generated only in CI; update .gitignore accordingly
+- Replace dry-run publish step with actual npm publish using a configured NPM_TOKEN secret for true continuous deployment
+- Optionally consolidate duplicate build steps in publish and smoke-test jobs by reusing workspace artifacts produced in quality-checks job
+- Verify that every push to main automatically publishes the package and monitor first real publish run
+- Ensure no future deprecation warnings by periodically reviewing GitHub Actions versions and updating as needed
 
 ## FUNCTIONALITY ASSESSMENT (undefined% ± 95% COMPLETE)
 - Functionality assessment skipped - fix 3 deficient support area(s) first
 - Support areas must meet thresholds before assessing feature completion
-- Deficient areas: TESTING (87%), DOCUMENTATION (85%), VERSION_CONTROL (85%)
+- Deficient areas: CODE_QUALITY (85%), EXECUTION (85%), VERSION_CONTROL (55%)
 - Principle: "Improvement of daily work is higher priority than daily work" - fix foundation before building features
 
 **Next Steps:**
-- TESTING: Convert rule test headers to JSDoc block comments with @story/@req to match traceability standard
-- TESTING: Remove or minimize custom logic in tests (flatMap, sort) or replace with explicit expected arrays
-- DOCUMENTATION: Update README.md ‘Available Rules’ section to list all six rules or clearly link to the full API reference.
-- DOCUMENTATION: Move or duplicate configuration presets documentation into user-docs/ (e.g. user-docs/configuration.md) so all end-user docs are collocated.
-- VERSION_CONTROL: Add a post-deployment smoke test or package validation step in the CI/CD workflow
-- VERSION_CONTROL: Incorporate the cli-integration.js script into the GitHub Actions ‘quality-checks’ job to match the pre-push hook
+- CODE_QUALITY: Consider lowering max-lines-per-function from 80 to 60 (or 50) over time via incremental ratcheting
+- CODE_QUALITY: Introduce an explicit complexity-ratchet plan: gradually reduce ESLint complexity threshold and refactor failing functions
+- EXECUTION: Configure NPM_TOKEN secret and remove `--dry-run` to enable real publishing
+- EXECUTION: Extend smoke test to install plugin directly from npm after publishing
+- VERSION_CONTROL: Remove committed build artifacts (lib/) from repository and ensure they’re generated only in CI; update .gitignore accordingly
+- VERSION_CONTROL: Replace dry-run publish step with actual npm publish using a configured NPM_TOKEN secret for true continuous deployment