engineering-intelligence 0.8.0 → 1.0.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (38) hide show
  1. package/dist/adapters/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
  2. package/dist/adapters/index.js +6 -4
  3. package/dist/adapters/index.js.map +1 -1
  4. package/dist/cli/index.js +20 -2
  5. package/dist/cli/index.js.map +1 -1
  6. package/dist/installer/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
  7. package/dist/installer/index.js +2 -10
  8. package/dist/installer/index.js.map +1 -1
  9. package/dist/manifest/index.d.ts +1 -1
  10. package/dist/manifest/index.js +1 -1
  11. package/dist/templates.d.ts +3 -2
  12. package/dist/templates.d.ts.map +1 -1
  13. package/dist/templates.js +24 -1
  14. package/dist/templates.js.map +1 -1
  15. package/dist/validation/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
  16. package/dist/validation/index.js +2 -11
  17. package/dist/validation/index.js.map +1 -1
  18. package/dist/visualizer/index.d.ts.map +1 -1
  19. package/dist/visualizer/index.js +100 -5
  20. package/dist/visualizer/index.js.map +1 -1
  21. package/package.json +1 -1
  22. package/templates/canonical/agents/engineering-orchestrator.md +21 -2
  23. package/templates/canonical/skills/codebase-discovery-engine/SKILL.md +428 -0
  24. package/templates/canonical/skills/convention-detector/SKILL.md +199 -0
  25. package/templates/canonical/skills/debugging-engine/SKILL.md +189 -0
  26. package/templates/canonical/skills/engineering-intelligence-skill/SKILL.md +4 -1
  27. package/templates/canonical/skills/git-intelligence-engine/SKILL.md +146 -0
  28. package/templates/canonical/skills/graph-engine/SKILL.md +30 -5
  29. package/templates/canonical/skills/greenfield-architect/SKILL.md +287 -0
  30. package/templates/canonical/skills/impact-analysis-engine/SKILL.md +12 -4
  31. package/templates/canonical/skills/incremental-sync-engine/SKILL.md +17 -0
  32. package/templates/canonical/skills/ongoing-learning-engine/SKILL.md +175 -0
  33. package/templates/canonical/skills/performance-analysis-engine/SKILL.md +156 -0
  34. package/templates/canonical/skills/pr-intelligence-engine/SKILL.md +127 -0
  35. package/templates/canonical/skills/security-audit-engine/SKILL.md +165 -0
  36. package/templates/canonical/skills/staleness-detector/SKILL.md +185 -0
  37. package/templates/canonical/workflows/create-project.md +63 -0
  38. package/templates/canonical/workflows/discover-codebase.md +60 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ description: Create a new project from scratch with full AIDLC — from architectural interview through scaffolding, intelligence initialization, and convention detection.
3
+ ---
4
+
5
+ # Create Project
6
+
7
+ Chain `greenfield-architect` → scaffold → `initialize-intelligence-skill` → `convention-detector` to produce a fully instrumented project with engineering intelligence from day one.
8
+
9
+ ## Input
10
+
11
+ A description of the project to create: purpose, domain, technology preferences, and constraints. If insufficient context is provided, the architectural interview in step 1 will gather it.
12
+
13
+ ## Output
14
+
15
+ A complete, scaffolded project with:
16
+
17
+ | Category | Content |
18
+ |---|---|
19
+ | Project scaffold | Directory structure, configuration, dependencies, build system |
20
+ | Knowledge Base | `knowledge-base/` — initialized project intelligence |
21
+ | Memory | `.engineering-intelligence/memory/` — initial decisions and patterns |
22
+ | Context | `.engineering-intelligence/context/` — AI navigation maps |
23
+ | Graphs | `.engineering-intelligence/graph/` — initial architecture graphs |
24
+ | Conventions | `knowledge-base/06-conventions-and-standards.md` — detected and configured conventions |
25
+ | Change Record | `.changes/CHG-000-initialization.md` — project creation record |
26
+
27
+ ## Execution Steps
28
+
29
+ 1. **Architectural Interview** — Invoke `greenfield-architect` to conduct a structured interview:
30
+ - Gather requirements: domain, scale, team size, deployment targets
31
+ - Explore technology choices: language, framework, database, infrastructure
32
+ - Define architecture: monolith vs microservices, API style, data patterns
33
+ - Record decisions as ADRs in `knowledge-base/05-architecture-decisions.md`
34
+ - Produce a project blueprint before proceeding
35
+
36
+ 2. **Scaffold Project** — Based on the architectural blueprint:
37
+ - Create directory structure following chosen conventions
38
+ - Initialize package manifests and dependency management
39
+ - Configure build system, linting, and formatting
40
+ - Set up test infrastructure
41
+ - Create initial CI/CD pipeline configuration
42
+ - Add README, LICENSE, and contributing guidelines
43
+ - Initialize git repository with initial commit
44
+
45
+ 3. **Initialize Intelligence** — Invoke `initialize-intelligence-skill`:
46
+ - Generate knowledge-base documents from the scaffolded project
47
+ - Build initial architecture graphs
48
+ - Create AI context and navigation maps
49
+ - Write initialization change record (CHG-000)
50
+
51
+ 4. **Detect Conventions** — Invoke `convention-detector`:
52
+ - Codify the conventions established during scaffolding
53
+ - Document naming patterns, file organization, and code style
54
+ - Record testing conventions and patterns
55
+ - Update `knowledge-base/06-conventions-and-standards.md`
56
+
57
+ ## Rules
58
+
59
+ - Complete the architectural interview before scaffolding — do not assume technology choices
60
+ - Every architectural decision must be recorded as an ADR
61
+ - The scaffold must be functional — buildable and testable from the start
62
+ - Intelligence initialization must produce evidence-backed artifacts, not templates
63
+ - This workflow creates a new project and modifies the scaffolded project code
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ description: Autonomously discover and understand an existing codebase through systematic analysis, interactive clarification, and finalized intelligence artifacts — without modifying product code.
3
+ ---
4
+
5
+ # Discover Codebase
6
+
7
+ Use `codebase-discovery-engine` to build a complete understanding of an existing project, then present findings, resolve ambiguities through clarification, and finalize the intelligence baseline.
8
+
9
+ ## Input
10
+
11
+ An existing repository to analyze. If the repository path is ambiguous, ask for clarification.
12
+
13
+ ## Output
14
+
15
+ Finalized codebase understanding captured in intelligence artifacts:
16
+
17
+ | Category | Path | Content |
18
+ |---|---|---|
19
+ | Knowledge Base | `knowledge-base/` | Evidence-backed project documentation |
20
+ | Graphs | `.engineering-intelligence/graph/` | Architecture graphs and maps |
21
+ | Context | `.engineering-intelligence/context/` | AI navigation maps |
22
+ | Discovery Report | `.engineering-intelligence/reports/DISCOVERY-*.md` | Findings summary with confidence levels |
23
+
24
+ ## Execution Steps
25
+
26
+ 1. **Discover** — Invoke `codebase-discovery-engine` to scan the repository:
27
+ - Technology stack, frameworks, and runtimes
28
+ - Project structure and module organization
29
+ - API surfaces, database schemas, and integrations
30
+ - Build systems, CI/CD pipelines, and deployment targets
31
+ - Test infrastructure and coverage
32
+ - Authentication and authorization patterns
33
+
34
+ 2. **Present Findings** — Surface the discovery results to the user:
35
+ - Summarize what was found with confidence levels
36
+ - Highlight areas of uncertainty or ambiguity
37
+ - Call out architectural patterns and notable design decisions
38
+ - Identify gaps where information could not be determined from code alone
39
+
40
+ 3. **Ask Clarifications** — For areas with low confidence or ambiguity:
41
+ - Ask targeted questions about unclear architectural decisions
42
+ - Confirm assumptions about deployment topology
43
+ - Verify business domain understanding
44
+ - Clarify team conventions not evident from code
45
+
46
+ 4. **Finalize Understanding** — Incorporate clarifications and produce final artifacts:
47
+ - Update knowledge-base documents with confirmed information
48
+ - Mark remaining unknowns explicitly
49
+ - Generate architecture graphs via `graph-engine`
50
+ - Write discovery report with confidence assessment
51
+
52
+ ## Rules
53
+
54
+ - Begin with automated analysis — ask questions only for genuine ambiguity
55
+ - Every claim must cite evidence from the repository
56
+ - Do not fabricate details — mark uncertainty clearly
57
+ - Present findings before asking clarifications (show work first)
58
+ - This workflow does not modify product code
59
+
60
+ This workflow does not modify product code. It writes only intelligence artifacts.