eduevidence 5.2.0 → 6.0.0

package/examples/workplace-ai-assistant/intervention.json

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+{
+  "decision": "pilot",
+  "target_population": "Enterprise customer-support staff, stratified by tenure and baseline skill.",
+  "pilot_duration": "Proposed: two baseline weeks and six pilot weeks; not executed.",
+  "ai_usage_policy": "Start with low-risk, knowledge-base-covered queues; agents inspect and edit every proposed reply.",
+  "risk_control": [
+    "Start with low-risk, knowledge-base-covered queues; agents inspect and edit every proposed reply.",
+    "Stratify by tenure and baseline skill; retain expert discretion and measure review workload.",
+    "Minimize and redact customer data, restrict access and retention, and review supplier data-use terms before a pilot.",
+    "Escalate unfamiliar, ambiguous, sensitive or high-stakes requests to qualified humans; no autonomous commitments."
+  ],
+  "stop_conditions": [
+    "Pause immediately after a verified privacy leak or a serious unsafe or unauthorized customer commitment; investigate before resuming.",
+    "Pause expansion if blinded quality review crosses a pre-agreed noninferiority margin, including within experience strata."
+  ],
+  "evidence_alignment": [
+    "E-001",
+    "E-002",
+    "E-003",
+    "E-004"
+  ],
+  "extensions": {
+    "gap_id": "G-001",
+    "target_population": "enterprise_customer_support_staff",
+    "status": "proposed_not_executed"
+  }
+}

package/examples/workplace-ai-assistant/legacy-link-check.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "checked_on": "2026-09-08",
+  "scope": "Two synthetic-demo DOI spot checks; not an exhaustive link audit",
+  "results": [
+    {
+      "url": "https://doi.org/10.125/llt.2024.08",
+      "status": 404,
+      "resolved_url": "https://doi.org/10.125/llt.2024.08"
+    },
+    {
+      "url": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.104920",
+      "status": 404,
+      "resolved_url": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.104920"
+    }
+  ]
+}

package/examples/workplace-ai-assistant/methodology.json

@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+{
+  "target": "overall",
+  "verdict": "CONCERN",
+  "audit_items": {
+    "evidence_level": {
+      "status": "met"
+    },
+    "causal_identification": {
+      "status": "partial"
+    },
+    "external_validity": {
+      "status": "partial"
+    },
+    "cost_evidence": {
+      "status": "missing"
+    },
+    "stakeholder_representation": {
+      "status": "partial"
+    },
+    "implementation_evidence": {
+      "status": "partial"
+    },
+    "equity_analysis": {
+      "status": "partial"
+    },
+    "effect_size_reported": {
+      "status": "partial"
+    },
+    "uncertainty_quantified": {
+      "status": "partial"
+    },
+    "comparator_clarity": {
+      "status": "met"
+    },
+    "publication_bias_risk": {
+      "status": "partial"
+    },
+    "generalizability_claims": {
+      "status": "met"
+    }
+  },
+  "task_vs_learning_guard": {
+    "measured_construct": "workplace_task_performance",
+    "equates_task_with_learning": false,
+    "note": "Teaching outcomes are not applicable; productivity is not a claim about student learning."
+  },
+  "limitations": [
+    "One firm, one tool and a staggered nonrandom rollout; causal interpretation depends on identification assumptions.",
+    "Indirect evidence, not directly generalizable: brief incentivized writing tasks did not demand precise factual accuracy or customer-specific context.",
+    "Indirect evidence, not directly generalizable: consultants solving an experimental business case, not live customer tickets.",
+    "Same study as E-001; subgroup sample size was not extracted. This is not an independent replication."
+  ],
+  "suggestions": [
+    "Start with low-risk, knowledge-base-covered queues; agents inspect and edit every proposed reply.",
+    "Stratify by tenure and baseline skill; retain expert discretion and measure review workload.",
+    "Minimize and redact customer data, restrict access and retention, and review supplier data-use terms before a pilot.",
+    "Escalate unfamiliar, ambiguous, sensitive or high-stakes requests to qualified humans; no autonomous commitments."
+  ],
+  "extensions": {}
+}

package/examples/workplace-ai-assistant/report_spec.json

@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+{
+  "title": "Should an enterprise customer-support team introduce a generative AI assistant?",
+  "theme": "claude",
+  "mode": "demo",
+  "sections": [
+    {
+      "id": "decision",
+      "title": "Decision and boundaries",
+      "component": "DecisionCard",
+      "data_ref": "decision"
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "evidence",
+      "title": "Direct and indirect evidence",
+      "component": "EvidenceMatrix",
+      "data_ref": "evidence"
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "methodology_reviews",
+      "title": "Methodological limits",
+      "component": "MethodologyPanel",
+      "data_ref": "methodology_reviews"
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "applicability",
+      "title": "Deployment conditions",
+      "component": "ApplicabilityCard",
+      "data_ref": "applicability"
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "intervention",
+      "title": "Proposed pilot",
+      "component": "InterventionTimeline",
+      "data_ref": "intervention"
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "evaluation",
+      "title": "Evaluation and stopping",
+      "component": "EvaluationFlow",
+      "data_ref": "evaluation"
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "sources",
+      "title": "Verified primary sources",
+      "component": "SourceList",
+      "data_ref": "sources"
+    }
+  ],
+  "extensions": {
+    "data_origin": "manual_curated",
+    "domain": "policy",
+    "benchmark_eligible": false,
+    "render_status": "not_generated"
+  }
+}