edfcore 0.4.454 → 0.4.455

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -109,5 +109,5 @@ export declare const SIGNAL_FIELD_BLOCK_OFFSETS: {
109
109
  readonly reserved: 224;
110
110
  };
111
111
  /** Published package version. Kept in sync with package.json by a test. */
112
- export declare const VERSION = "0.4.454";
112
+ export declare const VERSION = "0.4.455";
113
113
  //# sourceMappingURL=constants.d.ts.map
package/dist/constants.js CHANGED
@@ -79,5 +79,5 @@ export const SIGNAL_FIELD_BLOCK_OFFSETS = {
79
79
  reserved: 224,
80
80
  };
81
81
  /** Published package version. Kept in sync with package.json by a test. */
82
- export const VERSION = '0.4.454';
82
+ export const VERSION = '0.4.455';
83
83
  //# sourceMappingURL=constants.js.map
package/docs/CHANGELOG.md CHANGED
@@ -6,6 +6,24 @@ alone does not tell you whether you were affected.
6
6
  edfcore is pre-1.0. Patch releases have carried behaviour changes where the old behaviour was a
7
7
  defect; those are called out below.
8
8
 
9
+ ## 0.4.455
10
+
11
+ - **Fixed** a test that refused what it was named after by accident. `timeline.test.ts` listed
12
+ "the probes are out of order" among the arrays `buildTimelineFromProbes` must refuse, and its
13
+ probes were records 0, 3, 1 — whose LAST entry is record 1 rather than record 3 on a four-record
14
+ file. `assertProbeShape` checks the two ends before it checks the order, so that array was
15
+ refused with "received probes for records 0..1, but the start offset comes from record 0 and the
16
+ span ends at record 3", and the ordering loop underneath had never run once in the suite.
17
+ - The case now runs 0, 2, 1, 3: both ends correct, so nothing before the loop has anything to say
18
+ about it, and rising onsets throughout, so the monotonicity check that runs next cannot claim it
19
+ either. Deleting the loop outright now fails one test instead of none.
20
+ - Every case in that table now asserts the sentence its guard produces, not just `RangeError`.
21
+ Three different refusals share the class, so asserting the class alone proves only that SOME
22
+ guard fired — which is exactly how the case above drifted without anyone noticing.
23
+ - Added the case the loop must NOT refuse: four probes in order, one of them intermediate.
24
+ `assertProbeShape` documents intermediate probes as optional rather than unwelcome, and a loop
25
+ that refused every array of three or more would have passed the disorder case just as well.
26
+
9
27
  ## 0.4.454
10
28
 
11
29
  - **Added** a test for `validateHeader`'s own `DATE_FIELDS_DISAGREE` check on the ordinary case:
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "edfcore",
3
- "version": "0.4.454",
3
+ "version": "0.4.455",
4
4
  "description": "Modern, typed, zero-dependency reader for EDF, EDF+, BDF and BDF+ biosignal files. Works in browsers and Node with true random access.",
5
5
  "keywords": [
6
6
  "edf",
package/src/constants.ts CHANGED
@@ -93,4 +93,4 @@ export const SIGNAL_FIELD_BLOCK_OFFSETS = {
93
93
  } as const;
94
94
 
95
95
  /** Published package version. Kept in sync with package.json by a test. */
96
- export const VERSION = '0.4.454';
96
+ export const VERSION = '0.4.455';