edfcore 0.4.220 → 0.4.222

package/README.md

@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ the reason to trust the reader.
 |---|---|
 | Entry points | 3 — `edfcore`, `edfcore/node`, `edfcore/validate` |
 | Functions, classes and constants | 78 |
-| Public types | 64 |
+| Public types | 65 |
 | Diagnostic codes | 46 |
 | CLI commands | 6 |
 

package/dist/constants.d.ts

@@ -109,5 +109,5 @@ export declare const SIGNAL_FIELD_BLOCK_OFFSETS: {
     readonly reserved: 224;
 };
 /** Published package version. Kept in sync with package.json by a test. */
-export declare const VERSION = "0.4.220";
+export declare const VERSION = "0.4.222";
 //# sourceMappingURL=constants.d.ts.map

package/dist/constants.js

@@ -79,5 +79,5 @@ export const SIGNAL_FIELD_BLOCK_OFFSETS = {
     reserved: 224,
 };
 /** Published package version. Kept in sync with package.json by a test. */
-export const VERSION = '0.4.220';
+export const VERSION = '0.4.222';
 //# sourceMappingURL=constants.js.map

package/docs/CHANGELOG.md

@@ -6,6 +6,23 @@ alone does not tell you whether you were affected.
 edfcore is pre-1.0. Patch releases have carried behaviour changes where the old behaviour was a
 defect; those are called out below.
 
+## 0.4.222
+
+- **Fixed** the README's public-type count, which said 64 and should say 65, and the guard that was
+  supposed to keep it honest. `api-surface.test.ts` read type names only out of `export type { … }
+  from` blocks, so it never saw `FileHandleLike` — `node.ts` declares that one and exports it in
+  place. It has been exported since 01132e1, the first commit, so the table has undercounted for
+  the life of the package while a test asserted it was right. The parser now counts a type because
+  it leaves the barrel, not because of which syntax it left by.
+
+## 0.4.221
+
+- **Corrected** the title of `docs-coverage.test.ts` now that 0.4.220 gave it a list of exceptions.
+  "Every exported symbol is documented somewhere" was true of what it checked before and is not
+  true of what it checks now — fourteen types are exempted by name. Leaving it would have been the
+  defect this file exists to catch, one level up: a claim of total coverage standing over a check
+  that does not have it.
+
 ## 0.4.220
 
 - **Added** the missing half of `docs-coverage.test.ts`. Its title is "Every exported symbol is

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "edfcore",
-  "version": "0.4.220",
+  "version": "0.4.222",
   "description": "Modern, typed, zero-dependency reader for EDF, EDF+, BDF and BDF+ biosignal files. Works in browsers and Node with true random access.",
   "keywords": [
     "edf",

package/src/constants.ts

@@ -93,4 +93,4 @@ export const SIGNAL_FIELD_BLOCK_OFFSETS = {
 } as const;
 
 /** Published package version. Kept in sync with package.json by a test. */
-export const VERSION = '0.4.220';
+export const VERSION = '0.4.222';