dura-mcp 1.0.0 → 1.0.1

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "dura-mcp",
-  "version": "1.0.0",
+  "version": "1.0.1",
   "type": "module",
   "description": "MCP server for DURA - Dependency Update Risk Analyzer. Integrates with Cline and other AI assistants.",
   "bin": {

package/server.js

@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
 #!/usr/bin/env node
 
+//thi is the main file of the mcp
+//however cline doesnt identify any tools whereas mcp inspector does
+
 import { Server } from "@modelcontextprotocol/sdk/server/index.js";
 import { StdioServerTransport } from "@modelcontextprotocol/sdk/server/stdio.js";
 import {
@@ -30,15 +33,9 @@ server.setRequestHandler(ListToolsRequestSchema, async () => {
     tools: [
       {
         name: "analyze_repository",
+        // title : "Analyse repository",
         description:
-          ```Complete dependency risk analysis for a GitHub repository.
-
-Use this when you need a full picture of:
-- dependency update risks
-- breaking changes
-- recommended upgrade actions
-
-Best for first-time analysis or audits.```,
+          "Complete dependency risk analysis for a GitHub repository.\n\nUse this when you need a full picture of:\n- dependency update risks\n- breaking changes\n- recommended upgrade actions\n\nBest for first-time analysis or audits.",
         inputSchema: {
           type: "object",
           properties: {
@@ -62,14 +59,9 @@ Best for first-time analysis or audits.```,
       },
       {
         name: "get_high_risk_dependencies",
+        // title: "High risk dependency finder",
         description:
-          ```Get only high-risk dependencies that require immediate attention.
-
-Use this tool when:
-- deciding whether updates are safe
-- reviewing CI failures related to dependencies
-- prioritizing dependency maintenance work
-```,
+          "Get only high-risk dependencies that require immediate attention.\n\nUse this tool when:\n- deciding whether updates are safe\n- reviewing CI failures related to dependencies\n- prioritizing dependency maintenance work",
         inputSchema: {
           type: "object",
           properties: {
@@ -89,14 +81,7 @@ Use this tool when:
       {
         name: "get_breaking_changes",
         description:
-          ```Get only dependencies with confirmed breaking changes.
-
-Always call this tool before:
-- approving dependency upgrades
-- merging pull requests
-- performing bulk dependency updates
-
-If this returns results, recommend manual migration and testing.```,
+          "Get only dependencies with confirmed breaking changes.\n\nAlways call this tool before:\n- approving dependency upgrades\n- merging pull requests\n- performing bulk dependency updates\n\nIf this returns results, recommend manual migration and testing.",
         inputSchema: {
           type: "object",
           properties: {
@@ -116,12 +101,7 @@ If this returns results, recommend manual migration and testing.```,
       {
         name: "get_risk_summary",
         description:
-          ```Get a concise summary of dependency risks and repository health.
-
-Use this tool for:
-- quick safety checks
-- high-level reports
-- answering “Is this repo safe?” questions```,
+          "Get a concise summary of dependency risks and repository health.\n\\nUse this tool for:\n- quick safety checks\n- high-level reports\n- answering “Is this repo safe?” questions",
         inputSchema: {
           type: "object",
           properties: {

package/utils/helper.js

@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ export function formatFullAnalysis(result, fromCache) {
       output += `**Current**: \`${dep.currentResolved}\` → **Latest**: \`${dep.latest}\`\n`;
       output += `**Update Type**: ${dep.diff} | **Risk Score**: ${dep.riskScore}/100\n\n`;
       
-      // Why it's risky
+      // why it's risky
       if (dep.breakingChange?.breaking === "confirmed") {
         output += `**Breaking Changes Confirmed** (${(dep.breakingChange.confidenceScore * 100).toFixed(0)}% confidence)\n`;
         if (dep.breakingChange.signals?.strong?.length > 0) {