dsh-pleading-draft 0.2.3 → 0.2.4
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/CHANGELOG.md +6 -0
- package/README.md +3 -4
- package/package.json +1 -1
package/CHANGELOG.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,5 +1,11 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
# Changelog
|
|
2
2
|
|
|
3
|
+
## 0.2.4
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
- Correct the citation-status sentence in the standard-scope note, which still
|
|
6
|
+
said every excerpt admitted the clause text was not obtained after a batch
|
|
7
|
+
of rules had been given verbatim text and marked `direct`.
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
3
9
|
## 0.2.3
|
|
4
10
|
|
|
5
11
|
- Correct the severity and basis-kind cells in `## What it does` so they
|
package/README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -34,11 +34,10 @@ court's determinations and the advocate's substantive judgement.**
|
|
|
34
34
|
> plugin against a pleading whose cited article was repealed: it will pass, because looking up statutes is a
|
|
35
35
|
> different job and one this plugin deliberately does not do.
|
|
36
36
|
>
|
|
37
|
-
> **
|
|
37
|
+
> **The rule pack states its citation status rule by rule.** **4 of its 7 rules quote verbatim clause text** and are marked `direct`; the remaining 3 state in the `excerpt` field itself that the text was not obtained, and stay at `warn` or `info`. Where a rule still carries that note, treat it as a lead rather than as a citation. The
|
|
38
38
|
> regime lives in 《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》(notably its article on what a statement of claim must record)
|
|
39
|
-
> and the Supreme People's Court's interpretation of it.
|
|
40
|
-
>
|
|
41
|
-
> `info`. **When the texts are in hand, replace each `excerpt` with the real clause and raise `kind` to
|
|
39
|
+
> and the Supreme People's Court's interpretation of it. For the rules whose text the verification pass could not retrieve, the pack states the gap in the
|
|
40
|
+
> `excerpt` field itself rather than paraphrasing it, and those rules stay at `warn` or `info`. **When the texts are in hand, replace each `excerpt` with the real clause and raise `kind` to
|
|
42
41
|
> `direct`.**
|
|
43
42
|
>
|
|
44
43
|
> `PL-004` fires only when an amount column is filled, so a claim for a declaration or for a change of legal
|