devlyn-cli 0.1.0 → 0.1.2

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -5,8 +5,9 @@ Perform a comprehensive post-implementation review. After receiving tool results
5
5
  2. Read all changed files in parallel (use parallel tool calls)
6
6
  3. Check each file against the review checklist below
7
7
  4. Fix issues directly—do not just suggest fixes
8
- 5. Run test suite to verify changes don't break existing functionality
9
- 6. If tests fail use devlyn.resolve workflow to fix, then re-run tests
8
+ 5. Run linter (`npm run lint` or equivalent) and fix all reported lint issues
9
+ 6. Run test suite to verify changes don't break existing functionality
10
+ 7. If lint or tests fail → use devlyn.resolve workflow to fix, then re-run
10
11
  7. Generate summary report with file:line references
11
12
  8. Block approval if any CRITICAL or HIGH issues remain unfixed OR tests fail
12
13
  </procedure>
@@ -79,7 +80,10 @@ Be persistent. Complete the full review before stopping.
79
80
 
80
81
  **Approval**: [BLOCKED / APPROVED]
81
82
 
82
- - BLOCKED if any CRITICAL or HIGH issues remain unfixed OR tests fail
83
+ - BLOCKED if any CRITICAL or HIGH issues remain unfixed OR lint/tests fail
84
+
85
+ **Lint**: [PASS / FAIL]
86
+ - [lint summary or issue details]
83
87
 
84
88
  **Tests**: [PASS / FAIL]
85
89
  - [test summary or failure details]
@@ -155,14 +155,16 @@ You are the **Test Analyst** on an Agent Team performing a code review.
155
155
  2. Find existing test files for the changed code
156
156
  3. Assess test coverage for the changes
157
157
  4. Run the full test suite and report results
158
- 5. Identify missing test scenarios and edge cases
158
+ 5. Run the project linter (`npm run lint` or equivalent) and report any lint errors/warnings on changed files
159
+ 6. Identify missing test scenarios and edge cases
159
160
 
160
161
  **Your deliverable**: Send a message to the team lead with:
161
162
  1. Test suite results: PASS or FAIL (with failure details)
162
- 2. Coverage gaps: what changed code lacks tests
163
- 3. Missing edge cases that should be tested
164
- 4. Test quality assessment
165
- 5. Recommended tests to add
163
+ 2. Lint results: PASS or FAIL (with issue details on changed files)
164
+ 3. Coverage gaps: what changed code lacks tests
165
+ 4. Missing edge cases that should be tested
166
+ 5. Test quality assessment
167
+ 6. Recommended tests to add
166
168
 
167
169
  Read the team config at ~/.claude/teams/{team-name}/config.json to discover teammates. Share test results with other reviewers via SendMessage.
168
170
  </test_analyst_prompt>
@@ -278,14 +280,17 @@ Present the final review in this format:
278
280
  ### Review Complete
279
281
 
280
282
  **Approval**: [BLOCKED / APPROVED]
281
- - BLOCKED if any CRITICAL or HIGH issues remain unfixed OR tests fail
283
+ - BLOCKED if any CRITICAL or HIGH issues remain unfixed OR lint/tests fail
282
284
 
283
285
  **Team Composition**: [N] reviewers
284
286
  - **Security Reviewer**: [N issues found / Clean]
285
287
  - **Quality Reviewer**: [N issues found / Clean]
286
- - **Test Analyst**: [PASS/FAIL, N coverage gaps]
288
+ - **Test Analyst**: [Tests PASS/FAIL, Lint PASS/FAIL, N coverage gaps]
287
289
  - **[Conditional reviewers]**: [findings summary]
288
290
 
291
+ **Lint**: [PASS / FAIL]
292
+ - [lint summary or issue details]
293
+
289
294
  **Tests**: [PASS / FAIL]
290
295
  - [test summary or failure details]
291
296
 
@@ -49,11 +49,13 @@ Severity framework and quality bar for reviewing code changes. Apply this framew
49
49
  **BLOCKED** if any of:
50
50
  - CRITICAL issues remain unfixed
51
51
  - HIGH issues remain unfixed
52
+ - Lint fails
52
53
  - Tests fail
53
54
 
54
55
  **APPROVED** when:
55
56
  - All CRITICAL and HIGH issues are fixed
56
57
  - MEDIUM issues are fixed or have concrete justification for deferral
58
+ - Lint passes
57
59
  - Test suite passes
58
60
 
59
61
  ## Review Process
@@ -62,8 +64,9 @@ Severity framework and quality bar for reviewing code changes. Apply this framew
62
64
  2. Check each file against the severity framework
63
65
  3. For each issue: state severity, file:line, what it is, why it matters
64
66
  4. Fix issues directly — don't just list them
65
- 5. Run the test suite after all fixes
66
- 6. If tests fail use `/devlyn.resolve` or `/devlyn.team-resolve` to fix
67
+ 5. Run linter (`npm run lint` or equivalent) and fix all reported issues
68
+ 6. Run the test suite after all fixes
69
+ 7. If lint or tests fail → use `/devlyn.resolve` or `/devlyn.team-resolve` to fix
67
70
 
68
71
  ## Routing
69
72
 
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "devlyn-cli",
3
- "version": "0.1.0",
3
+ "version": "0.1.2",
4
4
  "description": "Claude Code configuration toolkit for teams",
5
5
  "bin": {
6
6
  "devlyn": "bin/devlyn.js"