devflow-kit 3.4.0 → 3.6.0

package/src/assets/commands/implement.mds

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ output-dir: dist/commands
 @import { knowledge_load, knowledge_writeback } from "./_partials/_knowledge.mds"
 @import { decisions_load } from "./_partials/_decisions.mds"
 @import { docs_root } from "./_partials/_docs_root.mds"
-@import { evidence_policy, evidence_exception } from "./_partials/_evidence_policy.mds"
+@import { evidence_policy } from "./_partials/_evidence_policy.mds"
 @import { issue_ref_grammar, issue_capture_contract } from "./_partials/_tracker.mds"
 @import { test_plan_line } from "./_partials/_plan_contract.mds"
 @import { publication_gate } from "./_partials/_publication.mds"
@@ -46,22 +46,14 @@ $ARGUMENTS
 
 ### Re-validation Continuation Path
 
-When the user explicitly asks to re-validate, re-check, or re-run quality gates after making their own changes:
-
-1. **Branch safety check**: If on a protected branch (main, master, develop, etc.), run Phase 1 to create/switch to a work branch. If already on a work branch, skip Phase 1.
-2. **Skip Phase 2** — no Code agent needed, user already made changes.
-3. **Detect FILES_CHANGED**: `git diff --name-only {base_branch}...HEAD`
-4. **Run Phases 3-8** — Simplify, Self-Review, Alignment, the one full Validate, QA Testing and the conditional Re-Validate, on the detected changes.
-5. **Proceed to Phase 10** (Create PR), **Phase 10b** (Evidence) and **Phase 11** (Report).
-
-If the user prompt does NOT match re-validation, proceed with the full pipeline below.
+When the user explicitly asks to re-validate, re-check, or re-run quality gates after making their own changes, resolve `${CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.claude}` in Bash, Read `<that directory>/skills/devflow:agent-references/references/commands/implement-revalidate.md` with the Read tool and follow it. Otherwise proceed with the full pipeline below.
 
 ### Phase 1: Setup
 
 <!-- learning:on -->
-**Produces:** TASK_ID, BASE_BRANCH, EXECUTION_PLAN, DECISIONS_CONTEXT, FEATURE_KNOWLEDGE, FEATURE_KNOWLEDGE_RULES, PR_DESCRIPTION_GUIDANCE, ISSUE_NUMBER, EVIDENCE_POLICY, ISSUE_REQUIRED, APPLY_CONVENTIONS, REQUIRE_NON_AUTHOR_APPROVAL, PR_EXCEPTIONS, TEST_PLAN, EVIDENCE_FILE, PR_TEST_PLAN_BLOCK, REVIEW_PUBLICATION
+**Produces:** TASK_ID, BASE_BRANCH, EXECUTION_PLAN, DECISIONS_CONTEXT, FEATURE_KNOWLEDGE, FEATURE_KNOWLEDGE_RULES, PR_DESCRIPTION_GUIDANCE, ISSUE_NUMBER, ISSUE_PR_LINK, EVIDENCE_POLICY, ISSUE_REQUIRED, APPLY_CONVENTIONS, REQUIRE_NON_AUTHOR_APPROVAL, PR_EXCEPTIONS, TEST_PLAN, EVIDENCE_FILE, PR_TEST_PLAN_BLOCK, REVIEW_PUBLICATION
 <!-- learning:off -->
-**Produces:** TASK_ID, BASE_BRANCH, EXECUTION_PLAN, FEATURE_KNOWLEDGE, FEATURE_KNOWLEDGE_RULES, PR_DESCRIPTION_GUIDANCE, ISSUE_NUMBER, EVIDENCE_POLICY, ISSUE_REQUIRED, APPLY_CONVENTIONS, REQUIRE_NON_AUTHOR_APPROVAL, PR_EXCEPTIONS, TEST_PLAN, EVIDENCE_FILE, PR_TEST_PLAN_BLOCK, REVIEW_PUBLICATION
+**Produces:** TASK_ID, BASE_BRANCH, EXECUTION_PLAN, FEATURE_KNOWLEDGE, FEATURE_KNOWLEDGE_RULES, PR_DESCRIPTION_GUIDANCE, ISSUE_NUMBER, ISSUE_PR_LINK, EVIDENCE_POLICY, ISSUE_REQUIRED, APPLY_CONVENTIONS, REQUIRE_NON_AUTHOR_APPROVAL, PR_EXCEPTIONS, TEST_PLAN, EVIDENCE_FILE, PR_TEST_PLAN_BLOCK, REVIEW_PUBLICATION
 <!-- learning:end -->
 
 Record the current branch name as `BASE_BRANCH` - this will be the PR target.
@@ -131,16 +123,11 @@ visible, a silently discarded request is not.
 - `TASK_ID`: The branch name created by Git agent (use as TASK_ID for rest of flow)
 - `BASE_BRANCH`: Branch this feature was created from (for PR target)
 - `ISSUE_NUMBER`: the provider-canonical issue identifier for this task — the same value the Git agent emits as `ISSUE_ID` (if provided, or created by the Git agent's issue-first step in setup-task)
+- `branch_slug`: `TASK_ID` with every `/` replaced by `-`. It names `handoff-{branch_slug}.md` and `evidence-{branch_slug}.md` only when it matches `^[A-Za-z0-9._-]{1,200}$`; any other branch name stops the run here, telling the user it cannot name those files.
 
 {{issue_capture_contract()}}
 
-**Ticket link, only when `ISSUE_REQUIRED` is `true`:** when the capture above holds no `ISSUE_PR_LINK` (absent, or `(none)`), ask with AskUserQuestion before any Code spawn — "No tracker issue is linked to this task. Record a self-attested exception, or stop?" — offering exactly these two options:
-- **Record an exception** — the user gives the reason as free text. Render it with the grammar below, as kind `ticket-link`; when the rendered reason is empty, ask for it once more, and stop as below if it is empty again.
-- **Stop** — report `BLOCKED (no ticket link)`, name the branch setup-task created (`TASK_ID`) and `BASE_BRANCH` so it can be reused or removed, and give the remedy: create or link the tracker issue and re-run `/implement` with its reference, or — for a team that does not want ticket links — commit `.devflow/project.json` as `{"version":1,"evidence":"standard"}` on the default branch; a machine with compliance enabled still resolves `required` whatever that file says. Spawn nothing further.
-
-{{evidence_exception()}}
-
-**Record the exception at once**, before any Code spawn: write the rendered section as the `## Evidence Exceptions` section of `{worktree}/.devflow/docs/handoff-{branch_slug}.md`, creating the file if absent, and set `PR_EXCEPTIONS` to that section. The file is its one home until the PR exists: every later write to the file keeps the section byte-identical, every PR-creating Code spawn passes it verbatim as `PR_EXCEPTIONS`, and the file is deleted only once the PR exists — after the PR-creating Phase 2 Code agent under SINGLE_CODE_AGENT and SEQUENTIAL_CODE_AGENTS, after Phase 10 under PARALLEL_CODE_AGENTS. With no exception recorded, `PR_EXCEPTIONS` is `(none)`.
+**Ticket link, only when `ISSUE_REQUIRED` is `true`:** when the capture above holds no `ISSUE_PR_LINK` (absent, or `(none)`), resolve `${CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.claude}` in Bash, Read `<that directory>/skills/devflow:agent-references/references/commands/implement-evidence-asks.md` with the Read tool (once per run), then run its ticket link ask and **Record the exception at once** as it directs, before any Code spawn. `PR_EXCEPTIONS` is `(none)` until an exception is recorded.
 
 **Test plan.** Before any Code spawn, give the task a test plan in the evidence file `{worktree}/.devflow/docs/evidence-{branch_slug}.md` (`EVIDENCE_FILE`) — unlike the handoff file, it stays after the PR exists. It holds up to three sections, in this order and nothing else: `## Test Plan`; `## Evidence Exceptions`, a byte copy of `PR_EXCEPTIONS` present only while that is not `(none)`; and `## Claims`, always last, so every claim is appended at the end of the file. Create the file if absent; if it exists, replace its `## Test Plan` and `## Evidence Exceptions` sections and keep `## Claims` byte-identical.
 
@@ -156,11 +143,9 @@ node "$HOME/.devflow/scripts/verify-evidence.cjs" check tp "{worktree}/.devflow/
 
 `exit=0` passes. On any other result, rewrite the section once — the script names the failing line and its code on stderr — and check again. Still failing, or no line to write, means the test plan is **missing**: drop the `## Test Plan` section from the file.
 
-**Missing test plan, only when `EVIDENCE_POLICY` is `required`:** when the check above leaves the test plan missing, ask with AskUserQuestion before any Code spawn — "No test plan could be written for this task. Record a self-attested exception, or stop?" — offering exactly these two options:
-- **Record an exception** — the user gives the reason as free text. Render it with the exception grammar above, as kind `test-plan`; when the rendered reason is empty, ask for it once more, and stop as below if it is empty again. Add the rendered line to the `## Evidence Exceptions` section of `{worktree}/.devflow/docs/handoff-{branch_slug}.md` — after any `ticket-link` line, creating the section and the file when absent — and set `PR_EXCEPTIONS` to that section, under the same rules as the record above.
-- **Stop** — report `BLOCKED (no test plan)`, name `TASK_ID` and `BASE_BRANCH` so the branch can be reused or removed, and give the remedy: state the acceptance criteria in the task, the issue or a `/plan` document (its `## Test Plan` section is copied) and re-run `/implement`, or — for a team that does not want test plans enforced — commit `.devflow/project.json` as `{"version":1,"evidence":"standard"}` on the default branch; a machine with compliance enabled still resolves `required` whatever that file says. Spawn nothing further.
+**Missing test plan, only when `EVIDENCE_POLICY` is `required`:** when the check above leaves the test plan missing, Read the evidence-asks reference as in the ticket link step (when this run has not) and run its missing test plan ask before any Code spawn.
 
-When `EVIDENCE_POLICY` is `standard`, a missing test plan is never asked about: carry `Test plan: missing` to the Phase 11 report.
+When `EVIDENCE_POLICY` is `standard`, a missing test plan is never asked about: carry `Test plan: missing` to the Phase 12 report.
 
 **Test-plan outputs**, set once before any Code spawn:
 - `TEST_PLAN` — the TP lines of the evidence file's `## Test Plan` section, or `(none)` when the test plan is missing.
@@ -175,19 +160,23 @@ node "$HOME/.devflow/scripts/verify-evidence.cjs" render --plan "{worktree}/.dev
 {{settings.settings_resolve()}}
 
 {{publication_gate()}}
-Phase 10b passes the resolved value to `update-pr-evidence`, which decides what each value means for the evidence comment. From the same line: {{compliance.compliance_frameworks()}} Pass it to every Code spawn.
+Phase 11 passes the resolved value to the evidence script (`publish`), which decides what each value means for the evidence comment. From the same line: {{compliance.compliance_frameworks()}}
+
+{{compliance.compliance_inject()}}
+
+Pass `COMPLIANCE_DIRECTIVE` to every Code and Fix spawn, on a line of its own.
 
 {{decisions_load()}}
 <!-- learning:on -->
-Pass `DECISIONS_CONTEXT` to Code agent (Phase 2) and Scrutinize agent (Phase 4).
+Pass `DECISIONS_CONTEXT` to Code agent (Phase 2) and Harden agent (Phase 4).
 
 <!-- learning:end -->
 {{knowledge_load()}}
 
 ### Phase 2: Implement
 
-**Produces:** CODE_AGENT_OUTPUT, FILES_CHANGED, PR_URL
-**Requires:** TASK_ID, BASE_BRANCH, EXECUTION_PLAN, PR_DESCRIPTION_GUIDANCE, PR_EXCEPTIONS, PR_TEST_PLAN_BLOCK
+**Produces:** CODE_AGENT_OUTPUT, FILES_CHANGED
+**Requires:** TASK_ID, BASE_BRANCH, EXECUTION_PLAN
 
 Based on Setup context (plan document, issue body, or conversation context), use the three-strategy framework:
 
@@ -213,18 +202,11 @@ TASK_DESCRIPTION: {description}
 BASE_BRANCH: {base branch}
 EXECUTION_PLAN: {full plan from setup context}
 PATTERNS: {patterns from plan document or empty}
-CREATE_PR: true
-DOMAIN: {detected domain or 'fullstack'}
 FEATURE_KNOWLEDGE: {feature_knowledge}
 <!-- learning:on -->
 DECISIONS_CONTEXT: {decisions_context}
 <!-- learning:end -->
-COMPLIANCE_FRAMEWORKS: {COMPLIANCE_FRAMEWORKS}
-PR_DESCRIPTION_GUIDANCE: {pr_description_guidance}
-ISSUE_NUMBER: {ISSUE_ID captured in Phase 1, or (none)}
-ISSUE_PR_LINK: {ISSUE_PR_LINK captured in Phase 1, or (none)}
-PR_EXCEPTIONS: {the ## Evidence Exceptions section of {worktree}/.devflow/docs/handoff-{branch_slug}.md verbatim, or (none)}
-PR_TEST_PLAN_BLOCK: {PR_TEST_PLAN_BLOCK from Phase 1 verbatim, or (none)}"
+{COMPLIANCE_DIRECTIVE}"
 ```
 
 ---
@@ -242,16 +224,11 @@ TASK_DESCRIPTION: {phase 1 description}
 BASE_BRANCH: {base branch}
 EXECUTION_PLAN: {phase 1 steps}
 PATTERNS: {patterns from plan document or empty}
-CREATE_PR: false
-DOMAIN: {phase 1 domain, e.g., 'backend'}
 FEATURE_KNOWLEDGE: {feature_knowledge}
 <!-- learning:on -->
 DECISIONS_CONTEXT: {decisions_context}
 <!-- learning:end -->
-COMPLIANCE_FRAMEWORKS: {COMPLIANCE_FRAMEWORKS}
-PR_DESCRIPTION_GUIDANCE: {pr_description_guidance}
-ISSUE_NUMBER: {ISSUE_ID captured in Phase 1, or (none)}
-ISSUE_PR_LINK: {ISSUE_PR_LINK captured in Phase 1, or (none)}
+{COMPLIANCE_DIRECTIVE}
 HANDOFF_REQUIRED: true
 HANDOFF_FILE: {worktree}/.devflow/docs/handoff-{branch_slug}.md"
 ```
@@ -265,25 +242,18 @@ TASK_DESCRIPTION: {phase N description}
 BASE_BRANCH: {base branch}
 EXECUTION_PLAN: {phase N steps}
 PATTERNS: {patterns from plan document or empty}
-CREATE_PR: {true if last phase, false otherwise}
-DOMAIN: {phase N domain, e.g., 'frontend'}
 PRIOR_PHASE_SUMMARY: {summary from previous Code agent}
 FILES_FROM_PRIOR_PHASE: {list of files created}
 FEATURE_KNOWLEDGE: {feature_knowledge}
 <!-- learning:on -->
 DECISIONS_CONTEXT: {decisions_context}
 <!-- learning:end -->
-COMPLIANCE_FRAMEWORKS: {COMPLIANCE_FRAMEWORKS}
-PR_DESCRIPTION_GUIDANCE: {pr_description_guidance}
-ISSUE_NUMBER: {ISSUE_ID captured in Phase 1, or (none)}
-ISSUE_PR_LINK: {ISSUE_PR_LINK captured in Phase 1, or (none)}
-PR_EXCEPTIONS: {the ## Evidence Exceptions section of {worktree}/.devflow/docs/handoff-{branch_slug}.md verbatim, or (none)}
-PR_TEST_PLAN_BLOCK: {PR_TEST_PLAN_BLOCK from Phase 1 verbatim, or (none)}
+{COMPLIANCE_DIRECTIVE}
 HANDOFF_REQUIRED: {true if not last phase}
 HANDOFF_FILE: {worktree}/.devflow/docs/handoff-{branch_slug}.md"
 ```
 
-**Handoff Protocol**: Each sequential Code agent receives the prior Code agent's implementation summary via PRIOR_PHASE_SUMMARY and FILES_FROM_PRIOR_PHASE. The Code agent's built-in branch orientation step handles git log scanning, file reading, and pattern discovery automatically. Each Code agent with HANDOFF_REQUIRED=true appends its own `## Phase {N} Implementation Summary` section, at most 8,192 bytes, to `{worktree}/.devflow/docs/handoff-{branch_slug}.md` (survives context compaction), never rewriting an earlier section and keeping any `## Evidence Exceptions` section byte-identical; the next Code agent reads only the section of the phase immediately before its own through HANDOFF_FILE. The orchestrator writes no phase section. Delete `{worktree}/.devflow/docs/handoff-{branch_slug}.md` once the PR exists — after the final Code agent, which creates it, completes (cleanup).
+**Handoff Protocol**: Each sequential Code agent receives the prior Code agent's implementation summary via PRIOR_PHASE_SUMMARY and FILES_FROM_PRIOR_PHASE. The Code agent's built-in branch orientation step handles git log scanning, file reading, and pattern discovery automatically. Each Code agent with HANDOFF_REQUIRED=true appends its own `## Phase {N} Implementation Summary` section, at most 8,192 bytes, to `{worktree}/.devflow/docs/handoff-{branch_slug}.md` (survives context compaction), never rewriting an earlier section and keeping any `## Evidence Exceptions` section byte-identical; the next Code agent reads only the section of the phase immediately before its own through HANDOFF_FILE. The orchestrator writes no phase section. Delete `{worktree}/.devflow/docs/handoff-{branch_slug}.md` once the PR exists — after Phase 9 (cleanup).
 
 ---
 
@@ -299,16 +269,11 @@ TASK_DESCRIPTION: {independent subtask 1}
 BASE_BRANCH: {base branch}
 EXECUTION_PLAN: {subtask 1 steps}
 PATTERNS: {patterns}
-CREATE_PR: false
-DOMAIN: {subtask 1 domain}
 FEATURE_KNOWLEDGE: {feature_knowledge}
 <!-- learning:on -->
 DECISIONS_CONTEXT: {decisions_context}
 <!-- learning:end -->
-COMPLIANCE_FRAMEWORKS: {COMPLIANCE_FRAMEWORKS}
-PR_DESCRIPTION_GUIDANCE: {pr_description_guidance}
-ISSUE_NUMBER: {ISSUE_ID captured in Phase 1, or (none)}
-ISSUE_PR_LINK: {ISSUE_PR_LINK captured in Phase 1, or (none)}"
+{COMPLIANCE_DIRECTIVE}"
 
 Agent(subagent_type="Code"):  # Code agent 2 (same message)
 "OPERATION: implement
@@ -317,16 +282,11 @@ TASK_DESCRIPTION: {independent subtask 2}
 BASE_BRANCH: {base branch}
 EXECUTION_PLAN: {subtask 2 steps}
 PATTERNS: {patterns}
-CREATE_PR: false
-DOMAIN: {subtask 2 domain}
 FEATURE_KNOWLEDGE: {feature_knowledge}
 <!-- learning:on -->
 DECISIONS_CONTEXT: {decisions_context}
 <!-- learning:end -->
-COMPLIANCE_FRAMEWORKS: {COMPLIANCE_FRAMEWORKS}
-PR_DESCRIPTION_GUIDANCE: {pr_description_guidance}
-ISSUE_NUMBER: {ISSUE_ID captured in Phase 1, or (none)}
-ISSUE_PR_LINK: {ISSUE_PR_LINK captured in Phase 1, or (none)}"
+{COMPLIANCE_DIRECTIVE}"
 ```
 
 **Independence criteria** (all must be true for PARALLEL_CODE_AGENTS):
@@ -335,16 +295,16 @@ ISSUE_PR_LINK: {ISSUE_PR_LINK captured in Phase 1, or (none)}"
 - Different files/modules with no imports between them
 - Each subtask is self-contained
 
-### Phase 3: Simplify
+### Phase 3: Polish
 
-**Produces:** SIMPLIFY_OUTPUT
+**Produces:** POLISH_OUTPUT
 **Requires:** FILES_CHANGED
 
-After the Code agent completes, spawn Simplify agent to polish the code. The Phase 6 Validate covers its commits.
+After the Code agent completes, spawn Polish agent to polish the code. The Phase 6 Validate covers its commits.
 
 ```
-Agent(subagent_type="Simplify"):
-"Simplify recently implemented code
+Agent(subagent_type="Polish"):
+"Polish recently implemented code
 Task: {task description}
 FILES_CHANGED: {list of files from Code agent output}
 Focus on code modified by Code agent, apply project standards, enhance clarity
@@ -353,13 +313,13 @@ Commit any improvements with a conventional-commit message."
 
 ### Phase 4: Self-Review
 
-**Produces:** SCRUTINIZE_OUTPUT
+**Produces:** HARDEN_OUTPUT
 **Requires:** FILES_CHANGED
 
-After Simplify agent completes, spawn Scrutinize agent as the quality gate:
+After Polish agent completes, spawn Harden agent as the quality gate:
 
 ```
-Agent(subagent_type="Scrutinize"):
+Agent(subagent_type="Harden"):
 "TASK_DESCRIPTION: {task description}
 FILES_CHANGED: {list of files from Code agent output}
 <!-- learning:on -->
@@ -369,14 +329,14 @@ FEATURE_KNOWLEDGE: {feature_knowledge_rules}
 Evaluate 9 pillars, fix P0/P1 issues, report status"
 ```
 
-Scrutinize agent reports `### Status: PASS | FIXED | BLOCKED`. **If BLOCKED:** report to user and halt. **If PASS or FIXED:** continue to Phase 5. A FIXED status commits fixes and starts no Validate of its own: the Phase 6 run covers them.
+Harden agent reports `### Status: PASS | FIXED | BLOCKED`. **If BLOCKED:** report to user and halt. **If PASS or FIXED:** continue to Phase 5. A FIXED status commits fixes and starts no Validate of its own: the Phase 6 run covers them.
 
 ### Phase 5: Alignment Check
 
 **Produces:** ALIGNMENT_RESULT
 **Requires:** FILES_CHANGED, EXECUTION_PLAN
 
-After Scrutinize agent passes, spawn Evaluate agent to validate alignment. Evaluate agent receives `FEATURE_KNOWLEDGE_RULES` as acceptance context only; pattern and anti-pattern judgments belong to Scrutinize agent:
+After Harden agent passes, spawn Evaluate agent to validate alignment. Evaluate agent receives `FEATURE_KNOWLEDGE_RULES` as acceptance context only; pattern and anti-pattern judgments belong to Harden agent:
 
 ```
 Agent(subagent_type="Evaluate"):
@@ -394,21 +354,18 @@ Validate alignment with request and plan. Report ALIGNED or MISALIGNED with deta
 1. Extract misalignment details from Evaluate agent output
 2. Increment `alignment_fix_count`
 3. If `alignment_fix_count <= 2`:
-   - Spawn Code agent to fix misalignments:
+   - Spawn Fix agent to fix misalignments:
    ```
-   Agent(subagent_type="Code"):
+   Agent(subagent_type="Fix"):
    "OPERATION: alignment-fix
    TASK_ID: {task-id}
    TASK_DESCRIPTION: Fix alignment issues
    MISALIGNMENTS: {structured misalignments from Evaluate agent}
    SCOPE: Fix only the listed misalignments, no other changes
-   CREATE_PR: false
    <!-- learning:on -->
    DECISIONS_CONTEXT: {decisions_context}
    <!-- learning:end -->
-   ISSUE_NUMBER: {ISSUE_ID captured in Phase 1, or (none)}
-   ISSUE_PR_LINK: {ISSUE_PR_LINK captured in Phase 1, or (none)}
-   COMPLIANCE_FRAMEWORKS: {COMPLIANCE_FRAMEWORKS}"
+   {COMPLIANCE_DIRECTIVE}"
    ```
    - Loop back to Phase 5 (re-check alignment). The fix is not validated here: the Phase 6 run covers it.
 4. If `alignment_fix_count > 2`: Report misalignments to user for decision
@@ -418,7 +375,7 @@ Validate alignment with request and plan. Report ALIGNED or MISALIGNED with deta
 **Produces:** VALIDATION_RESULT, VALIDATED_HEAD
 **Requires:** BASE_BRANCH
 
-Validate takes the one full-suite slot, after every commit it must cover: Code, Simplify, Scrutinize and the alignment fixes. After Evaluate agent passes, spawn Validate agent. `FILES_CHANGED` is the branch diff, because the Code agent's own list misses the Simplify, Scrutinize and fix commits (`{base}` is `BASE_BRANCH`):
+Validate takes the one full-suite slot, after every commit it must cover: Code, Polish, Harden and the alignment fixes. After Evaluate agent passes, spawn Validate agent. `FILES_CHANGED` is the branch diff, because the Code agent's own list misses the Polish, Harden and fix commits (`{base}` is `BASE_BRANCH`):
 
 ```
 Agent(subagent_type="Validate"):
@@ -431,21 +388,18 @@ Run build, typecheck, lint, test. Report pass/fail with failure details."
 1. Extract failure details from Validate agent output
 2. Increment `validation_retry_count`
 3. If `validation_retry_count <= 2`:
-   - Spawn Code agent with fix context:
+   - Spawn Fix agent with fix context:
    ```
-   Agent(subagent_type="Code"):
+   Agent(subagent_type="Fix"):
    "OPERATION: validation-fix
    TASK_ID: {task-id}
    TASK_DESCRIPTION: Fix validation failures
    VALIDATION_FAILURES: {parsed failures from Validate agent}
    SCOPE: Fix only the listed failures, no other changes
-   CREATE_PR: false
    <!-- learning:on -->
    DECISIONS_CONTEXT: {decisions_context}
    <!-- learning:end -->
-   ISSUE_NUMBER: {ISSUE_ID captured in Phase 1, or (none)}
-   ISSUE_PR_LINK: {ISSUE_PR_LINK captured in Phase 1, or (none)}
-   COMPLIANCE_FRAMEWORKS: {COMPLIANCE_FRAMEWORKS}"
+   {COMPLIANCE_DIRECTIVE}"
    ```
    - Loop back to Phase 6 (re-validate at the new HEAD, full scope)
 4. If `validation_retry_count > 2`: Report failures to user and halt
@@ -461,7 +415,7 @@ Run build, typecheck, lint, test. Report pass/fail with failure details."
 
 - `gate:validate` — after a Phase 6 or Phase 8 PASS.
 - `TP-<n>` — after every Phase 7 run, one line per `### Test Plan Evidence` row whose TP is in `TEST_PLAN`, with the row's outcome; the line ends at `by:test` when the row's Exit is not a number from 0 to 255.
-- Append nothing from a report whose `HEAD:` is not a single 40-hex SHA — a reported before/after change included — and say so in the Phase 11 report.
+- Append nothing from a report whose `HEAD:` is not a single 40-hex SHA — a reported before/after change included — and say so in the Phase 12 report.
 
 ### Phase 7: QA Testing
 
@@ -488,24 +442,21 @@ After every Test agent run — PASS or FAIL, first run or retry — append its T
 1. Extract failure details from Test agent output
 2. Increment `qa_retry_count`
 3. If `qa_retry_count <= 2`:
-   - Spawn Code agent to fix QA failures:
+   - Spawn Fix agent to fix QA failures:
    ```
-   Agent(subagent_type="Code"):
+   Agent(subagent_type="Fix"):
    "OPERATION: qa-fix
    TASK_ID: {task-id}
    TASK_DESCRIPTION: Fix QA test failures
    QA_FAILURES: {structured failures from Test agent}
    SCOPE: Fix only the listed failures, no other changes
-   CREATE_PR: false
    <!-- learning:on -->
    DECISIONS_CONTEXT: {decisions_context}
    <!-- learning:end -->
-   ISSUE_NUMBER: {ISSUE_ID captured in Phase 1, or (none)}
-   ISSUE_PR_LINK: {ISSUE_PR_LINK captured in Phase 1, or (none)}
-   COMPLIANCE_FRAMEWORKS: {COMPLIANCE_FRAMEWORKS}"
+   {COMPLIANCE_DIRECTIVE}"
    ```
    - Loop back to Phase 7 (re-run Test agent). The fix is not validated here: Phase 8 covers it.
-4. If `qa_retry_count > 2`: Report QA failures to user for decision. The run stops at the report (Phase 11), so Phases 8 and 9 do not run.
+4. If `qa_retry_count > 2`: Report QA failures to user for decision. The run stops at the report (Phase 12), so Phases 8 to 11 do not run.
 
 ### Phase 8: Re-Validate (only if a qa-fix committed)
 
@@ -525,99 +476,94 @@ Verify the qa-fix commits did not break anything."
 
 **If PASS:** append a `gate:validate` claim (Phase 6's **Evidence claims**), then continue to Phase 9.
 
-### Phase 9: CI Status Gate
+### Phase 9: Open PR
+
+**Produces:** PR_NUMBER
+**Requires:** BASE_BRANCH, TASK_ID, ISSUE_NUMBER, ISSUE_PR_LINK, PR_EXCEPTIONS, PR_TEST_PLAN_BLOCK, PR_DESCRIPTION_GUIDANCE, APPLY_CONVENTIONS, CODE_AGENT_OUTPUT
+
+Run once, after the gates, under every strategy. This phase sits outside the strategy branches, so no run reaches the end with commits and no PR. No Code agent opens a PR: the Git agent does, and it pastes `ISSUE_PR_LINK`, `PR_EXCEPTIONS` and `PR_TEST_PLAN_BLOCK` through their paste gates and scrubs the body (D11) before `gh pr create`. This command renders no link line and creates no PR itself: the Git agent's Phase-1 rendering is the only one, forwarded verbatim.
+
+```
+Agent(subagent_type="Git"):
+"OPERATION: ensure-pr-ready
+WORKTREE_PATH: {worktree}
+BASE_BRANCH: {base branch}
+TASK_ID: {task-id}
+ISSUE_NUMBER: {ISSUE_ID captured in Phase 1, or (none)}
+ISSUE_PR_LINK: {ISSUE_PR_LINK captured in Phase 1, or (none)}
+PR_EXCEPTIONS: {the ## Evidence Exceptions section of {worktree}/.devflow/docs/handoff-{branch_slug}.md verbatim, or (none)}
+PR_TEST_PLAN_BLOCK: {PR_TEST_PLAN_BLOCK verbatim, or (none)}
+PR_DESCRIPTION_GUIDANCE: {pr_description_guidance from Phase 1 unless it is (none), then the Code agents' reports from CODE_AGENT_OUTPUT in spawn order — Implementation, Commits and Key Decisions, and a sequential agent's ## Phase {N} Implementation Summary}
+APPLY_CONVENTIONS: {APPLY_CONVENTIONS}
+COMMIT_UNCOMMITTED: false
+Open the pull request for this branch and return the pre-flight summary."
+```
+
+`COMMIT_UNCOMMITTED: false` keeps the Git agent from committing a stray file: the Code, Polish, Harden and Fix agents commit their own work. Capture the `- **PR**: #{number}` line of its `### Branch` as `PR_NUMBER`, its `### Uncommitted files` list and its `TRACEABILITY: DEGRADED ({reason})` lines for the Phase 12 report. If it returns `### Status: BLOCKED` or no PR number, report its reason to the user and stop at the report (Phase 12); Phases 10 and 11 do not run.
+
+### Phase 10: CI Status Gate
 
 **Produces:** CI_STATUS
-**Requires:** PR_URL, FILES_CHANGED
+**Requires:** PR_NUMBER, FILES_CHANGED
 
-Strategy-conditional: run when the PR already exists — **SINGLE_CODE_AGENT** and **SEQUENTIAL_CODE_AGENTS** (the Phase 2 Code agent with `CREATE_PR: true` creates it); skip for **PARALLEL_CODE_AGENTS** (its unified PR is created in Phase 10).
+Run under every strategy: Phase 9 opened the PR.
 
-**Push first, outside the gate block.** The gate reads CI for the pushed head, and the Simplify, Scrutinize and fix commits reach the PR only by a push. Push once — never force, and no retry:
+**Push first, outside the gate block.** The gate reads CI for the pushed head, and the Polish, Harden and Fix commits reach the PR only by a push. Push once — never force, and no retry:
 
 ```bash
 git push origin HEAD; echo "exit=$?"
 ```
 
-`exit=0` continues to the gate. Any other result, a rejected non-fast-forward push included, records `TRACEABILITY: DEGRADED (ci push failed)` for the Phase 11 report, reports "CI status unknown — verify manually before merging" and proceeds to Phase 10 without waiting. `PR_NUMBER` is the number in `PR_URL`.
+`exit=0` continues to the gate. Any other result, a rejected non-fast-forward push included, records `TRACEABILITY: DEGRADED (ci push failed)` for the Phase 12 report, reports "CI status unknown — verify manually before merging" and proceeds to Phase 11 without waiting.
 
 <!-- PATTERN: ci-status-gate -->
 1. Wait: run `cd {worktree} && HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD) && node "$HOME/.devflow/scripts/ci-wait.cjs" --pr {PR_NUMBER} --head "$HEAD_SHA"` through the Bash tool with `timeout: 600000`. Each run is one wait of at most 570 seconds and prints one line, `CI <STATUS> pr=… head=… failing=… pending=… waited=…` (INDETERMINATE adds `reason=…`). A missing or unparseable line, a status outside the six below, or a non-zero exit is INDETERMINATE.
-2. **If PASSING** → proceed to Phase 10.
-3. **If NO_PR or NO_CI** → skip: "No PR/CI configured, skipping CI validation." Proceed to Phase 10.
+2. **If PASSING** → proceed to Phase 11.
+3. **If NO_PR or NO_CI** → skip: "No PR/CI configured, skipping CI validation." Proceed to Phase 11.
 4. **If PENDING** and fewer than 3 waits have run → wait again (step 1). After the third wait → report "CI still running — verify manually before merging" and proceed.
 5. **If INDETERMINATE** and fewer than 3 waits have run → wait again (step 1). After the third wait → report "CI status unknown — verify manually before merging" and proceed.
 <!-- learning:on -->
-6. **If FAILING** and fewer than 2 fixes have run → report the failing checks from the line. Spawn `Agent(subagent_type="Code")` whose prompt opens with `OPERATION: ci-fix`, with `COMPLIANCE_FRAMEWORKS`, `CI_FAILURES`, `DECISIONS_CONTEXT` and `PUSH: false`; `CI_FAILURES` holds the failing-check names from the line and nothing else, because the Code agent fetches the full names and reads the logs itself and this command reads none. After a fix, push with the command above and, if a wait remains, wait again (step 1); a failed push records `TRACEABILITY: DEGRADED (ci push failed)`, reports "CI status unknown — verify manually before merging" and stops waiting. After the second fix still FAILING → report the failing checks and proceed.
+6. **If FAILING** and fewer than 2 fixes have run → report the failing checks from the line. Spawn `Agent(subagent_type="Fix")` whose prompt opens with `OPERATION: ci-fix`, with `COMPLIANCE_DIRECTIVE` (when it is not empty), `CI_FAILURES`, `DECISIONS_CONTEXT` and `PUSH: false`; `CI_FAILURES` holds the failing-check names from the line and nothing else, because the Fix agent fetches the full names and reads the logs itself and this command reads none. After a fix, push with the command above and, if a wait remains, wait again (step 1); a failed push records `TRACEABILITY: DEGRADED (ci push failed)`, reports "CI status unknown — verify manually before merging" and stops waiting. After the second fix still FAILING → report the failing checks and proceed.
 <!-- learning:off -->
-6. **If FAILING** and fewer than 2 fixes have run → report the failing checks from the line. Spawn `Agent(subagent_type="Code")` whose prompt opens with `OPERATION: ci-fix`, with `COMPLIANCE_FRAMEWORKS`, `CI_FAILURES` and `PUSH: false`; `CI_FAILURES` holds the failing-check names from the line and nothing else, because the Code agent fetches the full names and reads the logs itself and this command reads none. After a fix, push with the command above and, if a wait remains, wait again (step 1); a failed push records `TRACEABILITY: DEGRADED (ci push failed)`, reports "CI status unknown — verify manually before merging" and stops waiting. After the second fix still FAILING → report the failing checks and proceed.
+6. **If FAILING** and fewer than 2 fixes have run → report the failing checks from the line. Spawn `Agent(subagent_type="Fix")` whose prompt opens with `OPERATION: ci-fix`, with `COMPLIANCE_DIRECTIVE` (when it is not empty), `CI_FAILURES` and `PUSH: false`; `CI_FAILURES` holds the failing-check names from the line and nothing else, because the Fix agent fetches the full names and reads the logs itself and this command reads none. After a fix, push with the command above and, if a wait remains, wait again (step 1); a failed push records `TRACEABILITY: DEGRADED (ci push failed)`, reports "CI status unknown — verify manually before merging" and stops waiting. After the second fix still FAILING → report the failing checks and proceed.
 <!-- learning:end -->
 7. **Budget**: at most 3 waits and 2 fixes in all. When one is spent, report the current status and proceed.
 <!-- /PATTERN: ci-status-gate -->
 
-### Phase 10: Create PR
-
-**Produces:** PR_URL
-**Requires:** BASE_BRANCH, TASK_ID, PR_EXCEPTIONS, PR_TEST_PLAN_BLOCK
-
-**For SEQUENTIAL_CODE_AGENTS**: the PR already exists — the last Phase 2 Code agent (`CREATE_PR: true`) created it, and Phase 9 has gated its CI.
-
-**For PARALLEL_CODE_AGENTS**: spawn one Code agent to create the unified PR:
-
-```
-Agent(subagent_type="Code"):
-"OPERATION: pr-create
-TASK_ID: {task-id}
-TASK_DESCRIPTION: Create the unified PR for the parallel implementation
-BASE_BRANCH: {base branch}
-CREATE_PR: true
-PR_DESCRIPTION_GUIDANCE: {pr_description_guidance}
-ISSUE_NUMBER: {ISSUE_ID captured in Phase 1, or (none)}
-ISSUE_PR_LINK: {ISSUE_PR_LINK captured in Phase 1, or (none)}
-PR_EXCEPTIONS: {the ## Evidence Exceptions section of {worktree}/.devflow/docs/handoff-{branch_slug}.md verbatim, or (none)}
-PR_TEST_PLAN_BLOCK: {PR_TEST_PLAN_BLOCK from Phase 1 verbatim, or (none)}
-COMPLIANCE_FRAMEWORKS: {COMPLIANCE_FRAMEWORKS}"
-```
-
-Its Responsibility 7 composes the body, pastes `ISSUE_PR_LINK`, `PR_EXCEPTIONS` and `PR_TEST_PLAN_BLOCK` through their paste gates and scrubs the body (D11) before `gh pr create`. This command renders no link line and creates no PR itself: the Git agent's Phase-1 rendering is the only one, forwarded verbatim.
-
-**For SINGLE_CODE_AGENT**: PR is created by the Code agent (CREATE_PR: true) — the Code agent's Responsibility 7 handles Related Issues inclusion when ISSUE_NUMBER is provided.
-
-### Phase 10b: Evidence
+### Phase 11: Evidence
 
 **Produces:** EVIDENCE_RESULT
-**Requires:** PR_URL, EVIDENCE_FILE, REVIEW_PUBLICATION
+**Requires:** PR_NUMBER, EVIDENCE_FILE, REVIEW_PUBLICATION
 
-Run once, after Phase 10, under every strategy: the PR exists by now under all three — from Phase 2 for SINGLE_CODE_AGENT and SEQUENTIAL_CODE_AGENTS, from Phase 10 for PARALLEL_CODE_AGENTS. Skip it only when no PR was created. PARALLEL_CODE_AGENTS ran no CI gate, so its `ci` TPs usually read `INDETERMINATE` until a later refresh.
+Run once, after Phase 10, under every strategy: the PR exists by now, opened in Phase 9. The re-validation path has no CI gate and runs this phase straight after Phase 9. Skip it only when Phase 9 stopped the run. A `ci` TP reads `INDETERMINATE` only when the CI gate could not tell or did not run.
 
-**Push first.** Every claim is keyed to the HEAD an agent reported, and a Scrutinize or fix agent may have committed without pushing; a claim whose SHA is not in the PR reads `UNVERIFIED`. So push the branch once before the spawn — never force, and no retry:
+**Push first.** Every claim is keyed to the HEAD an agent reported, and a Harden or Fix agent may have committed without pushing; a claim whose SHA is not in the PR reads `UNVERIFIED`. So push the branch once before the script — never force, and no retry:
 
 ```bash
 git push origin HEAD; echo "exit=$?"
 ```
 
-`exit=0` continues to the spawn. Any other result, a rejected non-fast-forward push included, does not block: record `TRACEABILITY: DEGRADED (evidence push failed)` for the Phase 11 report and spawn anyway.
+`exit=0` continues to the script. Any other result, a rejected non-fast-forward push included, does not block: record `TRACEABILITY: DEGRADED (evidence push failed)` for the Phase 12 report and run the script anyway.
 
-```
-Agent(subagent_type="Git"):
-"OPERATION: update-pr-evidence
-PR_NUMBER: {number from PR_URL}
-EVIDENCE_FILE: .devflow/docs/evidence-{branch_slug}.md
-REVIEW_PUBLICATION: {REVIEW_PUBLICATION resolved in Phase 1, or auto}
-WORKTREE_PATH: {worktree}
-Update the PR's test-plan block and post its evidence comment."
+**Then refresh, inline.** The refresh is plumbing, so no Git agent runs it: `verify-evidence.cjs publish` is the whole `update-pr-evidence` operation — verify, the scrubbed block edit with its read-back, the scrubbed evidence comment — in one call. Use the Bash tool with `timeout: 180000`:
+
+```bash
+cd "{worktree}" && node "$HOME/.devflow/scripts/verify-evidence.cjs" publish --pr {PR_NUMBER} --evidence ".devflow/docs/evidence-{branch_slug}.md" --publication {REVIEW_PUBLICATION resolved in Phase 1, or auto}; echo "exit=$?"
 ```
 
-Omit the `EVIDENCE_FILE` line when that file does not exist. Capture the op's `## PR Evidence` block — its `EVIDENCE` line and its `**Body**:` / `**Comment**:` line — as `EVIDENCE_RESULT`, or its `TRACEABILITY: DEGRADED ({reason})` line. It never blocks: whatever it returns, continue to Phase 11.
+Drop the `--evidence` pair when that file does not exist or its path does not match `^[A-Za-z0-9._/-]{1,255}$`. `{PR_NUMBER}` is digits only, and the publication value is `auto`, `full`, `off` or `stub`. Capture its stdout as `EVIDENCE_RESULT`: the `## PR Evidence` block — its `EVIDENCE` line and its `**Body**:` / `**Comment**:` line — and any `TRACEABILITY: DEGRADED ({reason})` lines after it (exit 0), or the one line `TRACEABILITY: DEGRADED (evidence unavailable)` (exit 2). Empty stdout or any other exit is `TRACEABILITY: DEGRADED (evidence unavailable)`. It never blocks: whatever it returns, continue to Phase 12.
 
-### Phase 11: Report
+### Phase 12: Report
 
-**Requires:** VALIDATION_RESULT, ALIGNMENT_RESULT, QA_RESULT, PR_URL, EVIDENCE_RESULT
+**Requires:** VALIDATION_RESULT, ALIGNMENT_RESULT, QA_RESULT, PR_NUMBER, EVIDENCE_RESULT
 
 Display completion summary with phase status, PR info, and next steps.
 
-Show the test plan's evidence from Phase 10b: `Test plan: {VERIFIED-CI + ATTESTED-LOCAL}/{total} verified (VERIFIED-CI {n}, ATTESTED-LOCAL {n})`, read from the `EVIDENCE` line and never inferred, then its `**Body**:` / `**Comment**:` line verbatim. Without an `EVIDENCE` line, show `Test plan: evidence unavailable`; with no test plan, `Test plan: missing`.
+Show the test plan's evidence from Phase 11: `Test plan: {VERIFIED-CI + ATTESTED-LOCAL}/{total} verified (VERIFIED-CI {n}, ATTESTED-LOCAL {n})`, read from the `EVIDENCE` line and never inferred, then its `**Body**:` / `**Comment**:` line verbatim. Without an `EVIDENCE` line, show `Test plan: evidence unavailable`; with no test plan, `Test plan: missing`.
+
+If any Git agent output emitted `TRACEABILITY: DEGRADED ({reason})` lines during the run, or Phase 10's push, Phase 11's push or Phase 11's script output carried one, surface them verbatim in the report under a `### Traceability` subsection so the user can act on them.
 
-If any Git agent output emitted `TRACEABILITY: DEGRADED ({reason})` lines during the run, or Phase 9's push or Phase 10b's push recorded one, surface them verbatim in the report under a `### Traceability` subsection so the user can act on them.
+If Phase 9 listed uncommitted files, show them as a `### Uncommitted files` subsection: the user commits them or discards them.
 
 If Phase 1 recorded an evidence exception, show its `## Evidence Exceptions` lines in the report.
 
@@ -629,73 +575,34 @@ If Phase 1 recorded an evidence exception, show its `## Evidence Exceptions` lin
 /implement (orchestrator - spawns agents only)
 │
 ├─ Re-validation Path (when user says "re-validate"/"re-check"/"re-run gates")
-│  └─ Branch safety → skip Phase 2 → detect FILES_CHANGED → Phases 3-8 → Phase 10, 10b, 11
+│  └─ Branch safety → skip Phase 2 → detect FILES_CHANGED → Phases 3-8 → Phase 9, 11, 12
 │
 ├─ Phase 1: Setup
-│  └─ Plan document parsing (if .md path provided) - extracts execution plan, strategy, frontmatter issue
-│  └─ Git agent (operation: setup-task) - creates feature branch, fetches issue
-│  └─ Ticket-link ask (no linked ticket, issue required) - record a self-attested exception or stop
-│  └─ Test plan (evidence file) - copy or author TP lines, check them, render the PR block; missing under a required policy: record a test-plan exception or stop
-│
 ├─ Phase 2: Implement (3-strategy framework)
-│  ├─ SINGLE_CODE_AGENT (80%): One Code agent, full plan, CREATE_PR: true
-│  ├─ SEQUENTIAL_CODE_AGENTS (15%): N Code agents with handoff summaries
-│  └─ PARALLEL_CODE_AGENTS (5%): N Code agents in single message (rare)
-│
-├─ Phase 3: Simplify
-│  └─ Simplify agent (refines code clarity and consistency)
-│
+├─ Phase 3: Polish
 ├─ Phase 4: Self-Review
-│  └─ Scrutinize agent (quality gate, fixes P0/P1; status PASS | FIXED | BLOCKED)
-│
 ├─ Phase 5: Alignment Check
-│  └─ Evaluate agent (validates alignment - reports only, no fixes)
-│  └─ If MISALIGNED: Code agent fix loop (max 2 iterations) → re-check alignment
-│
 ├─ Phase 6: Validate (the one full-suite slot)
-│  └─ Validate agent (build, typecheck, lint, test over the branch diff)
-│  └─ If FAIL: Code agent fix loop (max 2 retries) → re-validate at the new HEAD
-│  └─ If PASS: record VALIDATED_HEAD, gate:validate claim → evidence file
-│
 ├─ Phase 7: QA Testing
-│  └─ Test agent (scenario-based acceptance tests, TEST_PLAN) → one claim per TP row → evidence file
-│  └─ If FAIL: Code agent fix loop (max 2 retries) → re-test
-│
 ├─ Phase 8: Re-Validate (only if a qa-fix committed)
-│  └─ Validate agent (changed-only over VALIDATED_HEAD..HEAD) → gate:validate claim
-│
-├─ Phase 9: CI Status Gate (SINGLE_CODE_AGENT + SEQUENTIAL_CODE_AGENTS; skipped for PARALLEL_CODE_AGENTS)
-│  └─ Push the branch, then ci-wait.cjs (inline, one wait ≤ 570 s) → Code agent on FAILING (3 waits + 2 fixes)
-│
-├─ Phase 10: Create PR (if needed)
-│  └─ SINGLE_CODE_AGENT: already created by the Phase 2 Code agent
-│  └─ SEQUENTIAL: already created by the last Phase 2 Code agent
-│  └─ PARALLEL: Code agent (pr-create) creates unified PR
-│
-├─ Phase 10b: Evidence (every strategy, once the PR exists)
-│  └─ Push the branch (never force; a failure is DEGRADED, not a stop)
-│  └─ Git agent (update-pr-evidence) - test-plan block + evidence comment; never blocks
-│
-├─ Phase 11: Report
+├─ Phase 9: Open PR (every strategy, outside the strategy branches)
+├─ Phase 10: CI Status Gate (every strategy)
+├─ Phase 11: Evidence (every strategy, once the PR exists)
+├─ Phase 12: Report
 │
 └─ Feature Knowledge Write-Back (Conditional)
-   └─ Knowledge agent (if documented area changed AND knowledge enabled)
 ```
 
 ## Principles
 
-1. **Orchestration only** - Command spawns agents, never does work itself; the inline calls are the bounded plumbing the charter allows: the Phase 9 and Phase 10b pushes, the Phase 9 ci-wait call and the evidence script checks
-2. **Plan-first** - Plan documents from `/plan` skip exploration/planning overhead entirely
-3. **Coherence-first** - Single Code agent produces more consistent code (default ~80% of tasks)
-4. **Agent ownership** - Each agent owns its output completely
-5. **Clean handoffs** - Each phase passes structured data to next; sequential Code agents pass implementation summaries
-6. **Honest reporting** - Display agent outputs directly
-7. **Simplification pass** - Code refined for clarity before PR
-8. **Strict delegation** - Never perform agent work in main session. "Spawn X" means call Agent tool with X, not do X's work yourself
-9. **Validate agent owns validation** - Never run `npm test`, `npm run build`, or similar in main session; always delegate to Validate agent
-10. **Code agent owns fixes** - Never implement fixes in main session; spawn Code agent for validation failures and alignment fixes
-11. **Loop limits** - Max 2 validation retries, max 2 alignment fix iterations, max 2 QA retries before escalating to user; the CI gate allows at most 3 waits and 2 fixes
-12. **CI awareness** - CI status is checked before merge for SINGLE_CODE_AGENT and SEQUENTIAL_CODE_AGENTS, whose PR exists from Phase 2; skipped for PARALLEL_CODE_AGENTS, whose PR is created in Phase 10; test-plan evidence (Phase 10b) is recorded under every strategy once the PR exists
+1. **Orchestration only** - Command spawns agents, never does work itself; the inline calls are the bounded plumbing the charter allows: the Phase 10 and Phase 11 pushes, the Phase 10 ci-wait call, the Phase 11 evidence publish call and the evidence script checks
+2. **Agent ownership** - Each agent owns its output completely
+3. **Honest reporting** - Display agent outputs directly
+4. **Strict delegation** - Never perform agent work in main session. "Spawn X" means call Agent tool with X, not do X's work yourself
+5. **Validate agent owns validation** - Never run `npm test`, `npm run build`, or similar in main session; always delegate to Validate agent
+6. **Fix agent owns fixes** - Never implement fixes in main session; spawn Fix agent for validation failures and alignment fixes
+7. **Loop limits** - Max 2 validation retries, max 2 alignment fix iterations, max 2 QA retries before escalating to user; the CI gate allows at most 3 waits and 2 fixes
+8. **CI awareness** - CI status is checked before merge under every strategy, once Phase 9 has opened the PR; test-plan evidence (Phase 11) is recorded under every strategy once the PR exists
 
 ## Error Handling