dev-booster 1.0.0

package/template/.devbooster/hub/personas/skill_intelligent-routing.md

@@ -0,0 +1,335 @@
+---
+name: intelligent-routing
+description: Automatic agent selection and intelligent task routing. Analyzes user requests and automatically selects the best specialist agent(s) without requiring explicit user mentions.
+version: 1.0.0
+---
+
+# Intelligent Agent Routing
+
+**Purpose**: Automatically analyze user requests and route them to the most appropriate specialist agent(s) without requiring explicit user mentions.
+
+## Core Principle
+
+> **The AI should act as an intelligent Project Manager**, analyzing each request and automatically selecting the best specialist(s) for the job.
+
+## How It Works
+
+### 1. Request Analysis
+
+Before responding to ANY user request, perform automatic analysis:
+
+```mermaid
+graph TD
+    A[User Request: Add login] --> B[ANALYZE]
+    B --> C[Keywords]
+    B --> D[Domains]
+    B --> E[Complexity]
+    C --> F[SELECT AGENT]
+    D --> F
+    E --> F
+    F --> G[security-auditor + backend-specialist]
+    G --> H[AUTO-INVOKE with context]
+```
+
+### 2. Agent Selection Matrix
+
+**Use this matrix to automatically select agents:**
+
+| User Intent         | Keywords                                   | Selected Agent(s)                           | Auto-invoke? |
+| ------------------- | ------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------- | ------------ |
+| **Authentication**  | "login", "auth", "signup", "password"      | `security-auditor` + `backend-specialist`   | ✅ YES       |
+| **UI Component**    | "button", "card", "layout", "style"        | `frontend-specialist`                       | ✅ YES       |
+| **Mobile UI**       | "screen", "navigation", "touch", "gesture" | `mobile-developer`                          | ✅ YES       |
+| **API Endpoint**    | "endpoint", "route", "API", "POST", "GET"  | `backend-specialist`                        | ✅ YES       |
+| **Database**        | "schema", "migration", "query", "table"    | `database-architect` + `backend-specialist` | ✅ YES       |
+| **Bug Fix**         | "error", "bug", "not working", "broken"    | `debugger`                                  | ✅ YES       |
+| **Test**            | "test", "coverage", "unit", "e2e"          | `test-engineer`                             | ✅ YES       |
+| **Deployment**      | "deploy", "production", "CI/CD", "docker"  | `devops-engineer`                           | ✅ YES       |
+| **Security Review** | "security", "vulnerability", "exploit"     | `security-auditor` + `penetration-tester`   | ✅ YES       |
+| **Performance**     | "slow", "optimize", "performance", "speed" | `performance-optimizer`                     | ✅ YES       |
+| **Product Def**     | "requirements", "user story", "backlog", "MVP" | `product-owner`                             | ✅ YES       |
+| **New Feature**     | "build", "create", "implement", "new app"  | `orchestrator` → multi-agent                | ⚠️ ASK FIRST |
+| **Complex Task**    | Multiple domains detected                  | `orchestrator` → multi-agent                | ⚠️ ASK FIRST |
+
+### 3. Automatic Routing Protocol
+
+## TIER 0 - Automatic Analysis (ALWAYS ACTIVE)
+
+Before responding to ANY request:
+
+```javascript
+// Pseudo-code for decision tree
+function analyzeRequest(userMessage) {
+    // 1. Classify request type
+    const requestType = classifyRequest(userMessage);
+
+    // 2. Detect domains
+    const domains = detectDomains(userMessage);
+
+    // 3. Determine complexity
+    const complexity = assessComplexity(domains);
+
+    // 4. Select agent(s)
+    if (complexity === "SIMPLE" && domains.length === 1) {
+        return selectSingleAgent(domains[0]);
+    } else if (complexity === "MODERATE" && domains.length <= 2) {
+        return selectMultipleAgents(domains);
+    } else {
+        return "orchestrator"; // Complex task
+    }
+}
+```
+
+## 4. Response Format
+
+**When auto-selecting an agent, inform the user concisely:**
+
+```markdown
+🤖 **Applying knowledge of `@security-auditor` + `@backend-specialist`...**
+
+[Proceed with specialized response]
+```
+
+**Benefits:**
+
+- ✅ User sees which expertise is being applied
+- ✅ Transparent decision-making
+- ✅ Still automatic (no /commands needed)
+
+## Domain Detection Rules
+
+### Single-Domain Tasks (Auto-invoke Single Agent)
+
+| Domain          | Patterns                                   | Agent                   |
+| --------------- | ------------------------------------------ | ----------------------- |
+| **Security**    | auth, login, jwt, password, hash, token    | `security-auditor`      |
+| **Frontend**    | component, react, vue, css, html, tailwind | `frontend-specialist`   |
+| **Backend**     | api, server, express, fastapi, node        | `backend-specialist`    |
+| **Mobile**      | react native, flutter, ios, android, expo  | `mobile-developer`      |
+| **Database**    | prisma, sql, mongodb, schema, migration    | `database-architect`    |
+| **Testing**     | test, jest, vitest, playwright, cypress    | `test-engineer`         |
+| **DevOps**      | docker, kubernetes, ci/cd, pm2, nginx      | `devops-engineer`       |
+| **Debug**       | error, bug, crash, not working, issue      | `debugger`              |
+| **Performance** | slow, lag, optimize, cache, performance    | `performance-optimizer` |
+| **SEO**         | seo, meta, analytics, sitemap, robots      | `seo-specialist`        |
+| **Game**        | unity, godot, phaser, game, multiplayer    | `game-developer`        |
+
+### Multi-Domain Tasks (Auto-invoke Orchestrator)
+
+If request matches **2+ domains from different categories**, automatically use `orchestrator`:
+
+```text
+Example: "Create a secure login system with dark mode UI"
+→ Detected: Security + Frontend
+→ Auto-invoke: orchestrator
+→ Orchestrator will handle: security-auditor, frontend-specialist, test-engineer
+```
+
+## Complexity Assessment
+
+### SIMPLE (Direct agent invocation)
+
+- Single file edit
+- Clear, specific task
+- One domain only
+- Example: "Fix the login button style"
+
+**Action**: Auto-invoke respective agent
+
+### MODERATE (2-3 agents)
+
+- 2-3 files affected
+- Clear requirements
+- 2 domains max
+- Example: "Add API endpoint for user profile"
+
+**Action**: Auto-invoke relevant agents sequentially
+
+### COMPLEX (Orchestrator required)
+
+- Multiple files/domains
+- Architectural decisions needed
+- Unclear requirements
+- Example: "Build a social media app"
+
+**Action**: Auto-invoke `orchestrator` → will ask Socratic questions
+
+## Implementation Rules
+
+### Rule 1: Silent Analysis
+
+#### DO NOT announce "I'm analyzing your request..."
+
+- ✅ Analyze silently
+- ✅ Inform which agent is being applied
+- ❌ Avoid verbose meta-commentary
+
+### Rule 2: Inform Agent Selection
+
+**DO inform which expertise is being applied:**
+
+```markdown
+🤖 **Applying knowledge of `@frontend-specialist`...**
+
+I will create the component with the following characteristics:
+[Continue with specialized response]
+```
+
+### Rule 3: Seamless Experience
+
+**The user should not notice a difference from talking to the right specialist directly.**
+
+### Rule 4: Override Capability
+
+**User can still explicitly mention agents:**
+
+```text
+User: "Use @backend-specialist to review this"
+→ Override auto-selection
+→ Use explicitly mentioned agent
+```
+
+## Edge Cases
+
+### Case 1: Generic Question
+
+```text
+User: "How does React work?"
+→ Type: QUESTION
+→ No agent needed
+→ Respond directly with explanation
+```
+
+### Case 2: Extremely Vague Request
+
+```text
+User: "Make it better"
+→ Complexity: UNCLEAR
+→ Action: Ask clarifying questions first
+→ Then route to appropriate agent
+```
+
+### Case 3: Contradictory Patterns
+
+```text
+User: "Add mobile support to the web app"
+→ Conflict: mobile vs web
+→ Action: Ask: "Do you want responsive web or native mobile app?"
+→ Then route accordingly
+```
+
+## Integration with Existing Workflows
+
+### With /orchestrate Command
+
+- **User types `/orchestrate`**: Explicit orchestration mode
+- **AI detects complex task**: Auto-invoke orchestrator (same result)
+
+**Difference**: User doesn't need to know the command exists.
+
+### With Socratic Gate
+
+- **Auto-routing does NOT bypass Socratic Gate**
+- If task is unclear, still ask questions first
+- Then route to appropriate agent
+
+### With ZED.md Rules
+
+- **Priority**: ZED.md rules > intelligent-routing
+- If ZED.md specifies explicit routing, follow it
+- Intelligent routing is the DEFAULT when no explicit rule exists
+
+## Testing the System
+
+### Test Cases
+
+#### Test 1: Simple Frontend Task
+
+```text
+User: "Create a dark mode toggle button"
+Expected: Auto-invoke frontend-specialist
+Verify: Response shows "Using @frontend-specialist"
+```
+
+#### Test 2: Security Task
+
+```text
+User: "Review the authentication flow for vulnerabilities"
+Expected: Auto-invoke security-auditor
+Verify: Security-focused analysis
+```
+
+#### Test 3: Complex Multi-Domain
+
+```text
+User: "Build a chat application with real-time notifications"
+Expected: Auto-invoke orchestrator
+Verify: Multiple agents coordinated (backend, frontend, test)
+```
+
+#### Test 4: Bug Fix
+
+```text
+User: "Login is not working, getting 401 error"
+Expected: Auto-invoke debugger
+Verify: Systematic debugging approach
+```
+
+## Performance Considerations
+
+### Token Usage
+
+- Analysis adds ~50-100 tokens per request
+- Tradeoff: Better accuracy vs slight overhead
+- Overall SAVES tokens by reducing back-and-forth
+
+### Response Time
+
+- Analysis is instant (pattern matching)
+- No additional API calls required
+- Agent selection happens before first response
+
+## User Education
+
+### Optional: First-Time Explanation
+
+If this is the first interaction in a project:
+
+```markdown
+💡 **Tip**: I am configured with automatic specialist agent selection.
+I will always choose the most suitable specialist for your task. You can
+still mention agents explicitly with `@agent-name` if you prefer.
+```
+
+## Debugging Agent Selection
+
+### Enable Debug Mode (for development)
+
+Add to ZED.md temporarily:
+
+```markdown
+## DEBUG: Intelligent Routing
+
+Show selection reasoning:
+
+- Detected domains: [list]
+- Selected agent: [name]
+- Reasoning: [why]
+```
+
+## Summary
+
+**intelligent-routing skill enables:**
+
+✅ Zero-command operation (no need for `/orchestrate`)  
+✅ Automatic specialist selection based on request analysis  
+✅ Transparent communication of which expertise is being applied  
+✅ Seamless integration with existing workflows  
+✅ Override capability for explicit agent mentions  
+✅ Fallback to orchestrator for complex tasks
+
+**Result**: User gets specialist-level responses without needing to know the system architecture.
+
+---
+
+**Next Steps**: Integrate this skill into ZED.md TIER 0 rules.

package/template/.devbooster/hub/personas/skill_lint-and-validate.md

@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+---
+name: lint-and-validate
+description: Automatic quality control, linting, and static analysis procedures. Use after every code modification to ensure syntax correctness and project standards. Triggers onKeywords: lint, format, check, validate, types, static analysis.
+allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, Bash
+---
+
+# Lint and Validate Skill
+
+> **MANDATORY:** Run appropriate validation tools after EVERY code change. Do not finish a task until the code is error-free.
+
+### Procedures by Ecosystem
+
+#### Node.js / TypeScript
+1. **Lint/Fix:** `npm run lint` or `npx eslint "path" --fix`
+2. **Types:** `npx tsc --noEmit`
+3. **Security:** `npm audit --audit-level=high`
+
+#### Python
+1. **Linter (Ruff):** `ruff check "path" --fix` (Fast & Modern)
+2. **Security (Bandit):** `bandit -r "path" -ll`
+3. **Types (MyPy):** `mypy "path"`
+
+## The Quality Loop
+1. **Write/Edit Code**
+2. **Run Audit:** `npm run lint && npx tsc --noEmit`
+3. **Analyze Report:** Check the "FINAL AUDIT REPORT" section.
+4. **Fix & Repeat:** Submitting code with "FINAL AUDIT" failures is NOT allowed.
+
+## Error Handling
+- If `lint` fails: Fix the style or syntax issues immediately.
+- If `tsc` fails: Correct type mismatches before proceeding.
+- If no tool is configured: Check the project root for `.eslintrc`, `tsconfig.json`, `pyproject.toml` and suggest creating one.
+
+---
+**Strict Rule:** No code should be committed or reported as "done" without passing these checks.
+
+---
+
+## Scripts
+
+| Script | Purpose | Command |
+|--------|---------|---------|
+| `scripts/lint_runner.py` | Unified lint check | `python scripts/lint_runner.py <project_path>` |
+| `scripts/type_coverage.py` | Type coverage analysis | `python scripts/type_coverage.py <project_path>` |
+

package/template/.devbooster/hub/personas/skill_mcp-builder.md

@@ -0,0 +1,176 @@
+---
+name: mcp-builder
+description: MCP (Model Context Protocol) server building principles. Tool design, resource patterns, best practices.
+allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Grep
+---
+
+# MCP Builder
+
+> Principles for building MCP servers.
+
+---
+
+## 1. MCP Overview
+
+### What is MCP?
+
+Model Context Protocol - standard for connecting AI systems with external tools and data sources.
+
+### Core Concepts
+
+| Concept | Purpose |
+|---------|---------|
+| **Tools** | Functions AI can call |
+| **Resources** | Data AI can read |
+| **Prompts** | Pre-defined prompt templates |
+
+---
+
+## 2. Server Architecture
+
+### Project Structure
+
+```
+my-mcp-server/
+├── src/
+│   └── index.ts      # Main entry
+├── package.json
+└── tsconfig.json
+```
+
+### Transport Types
+
+| Type | Use |
+|------|-----|
+| **Stdio** | Local, CLI-based |
+| **SSE** | Web-based, streaming |
+| **WebSocket** | Real-time, bidirectional |
+
+---
+
+## 3. Tool Design Principles
+
+### Good Tool Design
+
+| Principle | Description |
+|-----------|-------------|
+| Clear name | Action-oriented (get_weather, create_user) |
+| Single purpose | One thing well |
+| Validated input | Schema with types and descriptions |
+| Structured output | Predictable response format |
+
+### Input Schema Design
+
+| Field | Required? |
+|-------|-----------|
+| Type | Yes - object |
+| Properties | Define each param |
+| Required | List mandatory params |
+| Description | Human-readable |
+
+---
+
+## 4. Resource Patterns
+
+### Resource Types
+
+| Type | Use |
+|------|-----|
+| Static | Fixed data (config, docs) |
+| Dynamic | Generated on request |
+| Template | URI with parameters |
+
+### URI Patterns
+
+| Pattern | Example |
+|---------|---------|
+| Fixed | `docs://readme` |
+| Parameterized | `users://{userId}` |
+| Collection | `files://project/*` |
+
+---
+
+## 5. Error Handling
+
+### Error Types
+
+| Situation | Response |
+|-----------|----------|
+| Invalid params | Validation error message |
+| Not found | Clear "not found" |
+| Server error | Generic error, log details |
+
+### Best Practices
+
+- Return structured errors
+- Don't expose internal details
+- Log for debugging
+- Provide actionable messages
+
+---
+
+## 6. Multimodal Handling
+
+### Supported Types
+
+| Type | Encoding |
+|------|----------|
+| Text | Plain text |
+| Images | Base64 + MIME type |
+| Files | Base64 + MIME type |
+
+---
+
+## 7. Security Principles
+
+### Input Validation
+
+- Validate all tool inputs
+- Sanitize user-provided data
+- Limit resource access
+
+### API Keys
+
+- Use environment variables
+- Don't log secrets
+- Validate permissions
+
+---
+
+## 8. Configuration
+
+### Claude Desktop Config
+
+| Field | Purpose |
+|-------|---------|
+| command | Executable to run |
+| args | Command arguments |
+| env | Environment variables |
+
+---
+
+## 9. Testing
+
+### Test Categories
+
+| Type | Focus |
+|------|-------|
+| Unit | Tool logic |
+| Integration | Full server |
+| Contract | Schema validation |
+
+---
+
+## 10. Best Practices Checklist
+
+- [ ] Clear, action-oriented tool names
+- [ ] Complete input schemas with descriptions
+- [ ] Structured JSON output
+- [ ] Error handling for all cases
+- [ ] Input validation
+- [ ] Environment-based configuration
+- [ ] Logging for debugging
+
+---
+
+> **Remember:** MCP tools should be simple, focused, and well-documented. The AI relies on descriptions to use them correctly.