create-qa-architect 5.0.6 → 5.3.1
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/.github/workflows/auto-release.yml +49 -0
- package/.github/workflows/dependabot-auto-merge.yml +32 -0
- package/LICENSE +3 -3
- package/README.md +54 -15
- package/docs/ADOPTION-SUMMARY.md +41 -0
- package/docs/ARCHITECTURE-REVIEW.md +67 -0
- package/docs/ARCHITECTURE.md +29 -41
- package/docs/CODE-REVIEW.md +100 -0
- package/docs/PREFLIGHT_REPORT.md +32 -40
- package/docs/REQUIREMENTS.md +148 -0
- package/docs/SECURITY-AUDIT.md +68 -0
- package/docs/TESTING.md +3 -4
- package/docs/test-trace-matrix.md +28 -0
- package/lib/billing-dashboard.html +6 -12
- package/lib/commands/deps.js +245 -0
- package/lib/commands/index.js +25 -0
- package/lib/commands/validate.js +85 -0
- package/lib/error-reporter.js +13 -1
- package/lib/github-api.js +108 -13
- package/lib/license-signing.js +110 -0
- package/lib/license-validator.js +359 -71
- package/lib/licensing.js +343 -111
- package/lib/prelaunch-validator.js +828 -0
- package/lib/quality-tools-generator.js +495 -0
- package/lib/result-types.js +112 -0
- package/lib/security-enhancements.js +1 -1
- package/lib/smart-strategy-generator.js +28 -9
- package/lib/template-loader.js +52 -19
- package/lib/validation/cache-manager.js +36 -6
- package/lib/validation/config-security.js +82 -15
- package/lib/validation/workflow-validation.js +49 -23
- package/package.json +8 -10
- package/scripts/check-test-coverage.sh +46 -0
- package/setup.js +356 -285
- package/templates/QUALITY_TROUBLESHOOTING.md +32 -33
- package/templates/scripts/smart-test-strategy.sh +1 -1
- package/create-saas-monetization.js +0 -1513
|
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
name: Auto Release
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
on:
|
|
4
|
+
push:
|
|
5
|
+
tags:
|
|
6
|
+
- 'v*'
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
permissions:
|
|
9
|
+
contents: write
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
jobs:
|
|
12
|
+
release:
|
|
13
|
+
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
|
|
14
|
+
steps:
|
|
15
|
+
- name: Checkout
|
|
16
|
+
uses: actions/checkout@v4
|
|
17
|
+
with:
|
|
18
|
+
fetch-depth: 0
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
- name: Get previous tag
|
|
21
|
+
id: prev_tag
|
|
22
|
+
run: |
|
|
23
|
+
PREV_TAG=$(git describe --tags --abbrev=0 HEAD^ 2>/dev/null || echo "")
|
|
24
|
+
echo "tag=$PREV_TAG" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
- name: Generate release notes
|
|
27
|
+
id: notes
|
|
28
|
+
run: |
|
|
29
|
+
TAG=${GITHUB_REF#refs/tags/}
|
|
30
|
+
PREV_TAG=${{ steps.prev_tag.outputs.tag }}
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
if [ -n "$PREV_TAG" ]; then
|
|
33
|
+
echo "## Changes since $PREV_TAG" > notes.md
|
|
34
|
+
echo "" >> notes.md
|
|
35
|
+
git log ${PREV_TAG}..${TAG} --pretty=format:"- %s" >> notes.md
|
|
36
|
+
echo "" >> notes.md
|
|
37
|
+
echo "" >> notes.md
|
|
38
|
+
echo "**Full Changelog**: https://github.com/${{ github.repository }}/compare/${PREV_TAG}...${TAG}" >> notes.md
|
|
39
|
+
else
|
|
40
|
+
echo "Initial release" > notes.md
|
|
41
|
+
fi
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
- name: Create GitHub Release
|
|
44
|
+
uses: softprops/action-gh-release@v2
|
|
45
|
+
with:
|
|
46
|
+
body_path: notes.md
|
|
47
|
+
generate_release_notes: false
|
|
48
|
+
env:
|
|
49
|
+
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
name: Dependabot Auto-Merge
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
on: pull_request
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
permissions:
|
|
6
|
+
contents: write
|
|
7
|
+
pull-requests: write
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
jobs:
|
|
10
|
+
dependabot:
|
|
11
|
+
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
|
|
12
|
+
if: github.actor == 'dependabot[bot]'
|
|
13
|
+
steps:
|
|
14
|
+
- name: Dependabot metadata
|
|
15
|
+
id: metadata
|
|
16
|
+
uses: dependabot/fetch-metadata@v2
|
|
17
|
+
with:
|
|
18
|
+
github-token: '${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}'
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
- name: Enable auto-merge for patch and minor updates
|
|
21
|
+
if: steps.metadata.outputs.update-type == 'version-update:semver-patch' || steps.metadata.outputs.update-type == 'version-update:semver-minor'
|
|
22
|
+
run: gh pr merge --auto --squash "$PR_URL"
|
|
23
|
+
env:
|
|
24
|
+
PR_URL: ${{ github.event.pull_request.html_url }}
|
|
25
|
+
GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
- name: Approve PR
|
|
28
|
+
if: steps.metadata.outputs.update-type == 'version-update:semver-patch' || steps.metadata.outputs.update-type == 'version-update:semver-minor'
|
|
29
|
+
run: gh pr review --approve "$PR_URL"
|
|
30
|
+
env:
|
|
31
|
+
PR_URL: ${{ github.event.pull_request.html_url }}
|
|
32
|
+
GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
|
package/LICENSE
CHANGED
|
@@ -17,17 +17,17 @@ TERMS OF USE:
|
|
|
17
17
|
- Standard pre-commit hooks
|
|
18
18
|
|
|
19
19
|
2. PAID TIERS
|
|
20
|
-
- Pro: $
|
|
20
|
+
- Pro: $19/month or $190/year
|
|
21
21
|
- Security scanning (Gitleaks + ESLint security)
|
|
22
22
|
- Smart Test Strategy
|
|
23
23
|
- Multi-language support
|
|
24
24
|
- Unlimited repos
|
|
25
|
-
- Team:
|
|
25
|
+
- Team: Contact us (coming soon)
|
|
26
26
|
- All Pro features
|
|
27
27
|
- RBAC and team policies
|
|
28
28
|
- Slack alerts
|
|
29
29
|
- Multi-repo dashboard
|
|
30
|
-
- Enterprise:
|
|
30
|
+
- Enterprise: Contact us (coming soon)
|
|
31
31
|
- All Team features
|
|
32
32
|
- SSO/SAML integration
|
|
33
33
|
- Custom policies
|
package/README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -2,13 +2,13 @@
|
|
|
2
2
|
|
|
3
3
|
Quality automation CLI for JavaScript/TypeScript and Python projects. One command adds ESLint, Prettier, Husky, lint-staged, and GitHub Actions. Pro tiers add security scanning (Gitleaks), Smart Test Strategy, and multi-language support.
|
|
4
4
|
|
|
5
|
-
**This repo = the free CLI.** For the Pro dashboard with repo analytics, CI integration, and automation workflows, see [QA Architect Pro](https://vibebuildlab.com/
|
|
5
|
+
**This repo = the free CLI.** For the Pro dashboard with repo analytics, CI integration, and automation workflows, see [QA Architect Pro](https://vibebuildlab.com/qa-architect) (included in VBL Starter Kit).
|
|
6
6
|
|
|
7
7
|
---
|
|
8
8
|
|
|
9
9
|
> **Maintainer & Ownership**
|
|
10
10
|
> This project is maintained by **Vibe Build Lab LLC**, a studio focused on AI-assisted product development, micro-SaaS, and "vibe coding" workflows for solo founders and small teams.
|
|
11
|
-
> Learn more at **https://
|
|
11
|
+
> Learn more at **https://vibebuildlab.com**.
|
|
12
12
|
|
|
13
13
|
---
|
|
14
14
|
|
|
@@ -25,6 +25,22 @@ Quality automation CLI for JavaScript/TypeScript and Python projects. One comman
|
|
|
25
25
|
- **Progressive Quality** - Adaptive checks based on project maturity
|
|
26
26
|
- **Smart Test Strategy** - Risk-based pre-push validation (Pro feature)
|
|
27
27
|
|
|
28
|
+
### Quality Tools (v5.2.0+)
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
- **Lighthouse CI** - Performance, accessibility, SEO audits (Free: basic, Pro: thresholds)
|
|
31
|
+
- **Bundle Size Limits** - Enforce bundle budgets with size-limit (Pro)
|
|
32
|
+
- **axe-core Accessibility** - WCAG compliance testing scaffolding (Free)
|
|
33
|
+
- **Conventional Commits** - commitlint with commit-msg hook (Free)
|
|
34
|
+
- **Coverage Thresholds** - Enforce code coverage minimums (Pro)
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
### Pre-Launch Validation (v5.3.0+)
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
- **SEO Validation** - Sitemap, robots.txt, meta tags validation (Free)
|
|
39
|
+
- **Link Validation** - Broken link detection with linkinator (Free)
|
|
40
|
+
- **Accessibility Audit** - WCAG 2.1 AA compliance with pa11y-ci (Free)
|
|
41
|
+
- **Documentation Check** - README completeness, required sections (Free)
|
|
42
|
+
- **Env Vars Audit** - Validate .env.example against code usage (Pro)
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
28
44
|
## Target Users
|
|
29
45
|
|
|
30
46
|
- **Developers** who want quality automation without manual setup
|
|
@@ -41,12 +57,12 @@ npx create-qa-architect@latest
|
|
|
41
57
|
|
|
42
58
|
## Pricing
|
|
43
59
|
|
|
44
|
-
| Tier | Price
|
|
45
|
-
| -------------- |
|
|
46
|
-
| **Free** | $0
|
|
47
|
-
| **Pro** | $
|
|
48
|
-
| **Team** |
|
|
49
|
-
| **Enterprise** |
|
|
60
|
+
| Tier | Price | What You Get |
|
|
61
|
+
| -------------- | ----------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
62
|
+
| **Free** | $0 | CLI tool, basic linting/formatting, npm audit (capped: 1 private repo, 50 runs/mo) |
|
|
63
|
+
| **Pro** | $19/mo or $190/yr | **Security scanning (Gitleaks + ESLint security)**, Smart Test Strategy, multi-language, unlimited |
|
|
64
|
+
| **Team** | Contact us | + RBAC, Slack alerts, multi-repo dashboard, team audit log _(coming soon)_ |
|
|
65
|
+
| **Enterprise** | Contact us | + SSO/SAML, custom policies, compliance pack, dedicated TAM _(coming soon)_ |
|
|
50
66
|
|
|
51
67
|
> **Pro included in [VBL Starter Kit](https://vibebuildlab.com/starter-kit)** — Team/Enterprise are standalone purchases.
|
|
52
68
|
|
|
@@ -58,6 +74,27 @@ npx create-qa-architect@latest
|
|
|
58
74
|
| Gitleaks (secrets scanning) | ❌ | ✅ |
|
|
59
75
|
| ESLint security rules | ❌ | ✅ |
|
|
60
76
|
|
|
77
|
+
### Quality Tools by Tier
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
| Feature | Free | Pro+ |
|
|
80
|
+
| ---------------------------- | ---- | ---- |
|
|
81
|
+
| Lighthouse CI (basic scores) | ✅ | ✅ |
|
|
82
|
+
| Lighthouse thresholds | ❌ | ✅ |
|
|
83
|
+
| axe-core accessibility | ✅ | ✅ |
|
|
84
|
+
| Conventional commits | ✅ | ✅ |
|
|
85
|
+
| Bundle size limits | ❌ | ✅ |
|
|
86
|
+
| Coverage thresholds | ❌ | ✅ |
|
|
87
|
+
|
|
88
|
+
### Pre-Launch Validation by Tier
|
|
89
|
+
|
|
90
|
+
| Feature | Free | Pro+ |
|
|
91
|
+
| ------------------- | ---- | ---- |
|
|
92
|
+
| SEO validation | ✅ | ✅ |
|
|
93
|
+
| Link validation | ✅ | ✅ |
|
|
94
|
+
| Accessibility audit | ✅ | ✅ |
|
|
95
|
+
| Documentation check | ✅ | ✅ |
|
|
96
|
+
| Env vars audit | ❌ | ✅ |
|
|
97
|
+
|
|
61
98
|
### License
|
|
62
99
|
|
|
63
100
|
**Commercial License (freemium)** — free tier covers the basic CLI; Pro/Team/Enterprise features require a paid subscription. See [LICENSE](LICENSE).
|
|
@@ -113,6 +150,14 @@ npm run lint
|
|
|
113
150
|
npx create-qa-architect@latest --deps
|
|
114
151
|
```
|
|
115
152
|
|
|
153
|
+
### Pre-Launch Validation (Free)
|
|
154
|
+
|
|
155
|
+
```bash
|
|
156
|
+
npx create-qa-architect@latest --prelaunch
|
|
157
|
+
npm install
|
|
158
|
+
npm run validate:prelaunch
|
|
159
|
+
```
|
|
160
|
+
|
|
116
161
|
## Usage Examples
|
|
117
162
|
|
|
118
163
|
### Check Project Maturity
|
|
@@ -188,13 +233,7 @@ npm run validate:pre-push # Pre-push validation
|
|
|
188
233
|
|
|
189
234
|
## Roadmap
|
|
190
235
|
|
|
191
|
-
|
|
192
|
-
- [x] Progressive quality (maturity detection)
|
|
193
|
-
- [x] Python toolchain support
|
|
194
|
-
- [x] Smart test strategy (Pro)
|
|
195
|
-
- [x] Monorepo support (Nx, Turborepo, Lerna, Rush, npm/pnpm/yarn workspaces)
|
|
196
|
-
- [ ] Rust and Go support
|
|
197
|
-
- [ ] VS Code extension
|
|
236
|
+
See [ROADMAP.md](ROADMAP.md) for planned features and strategic direction.
|
|
198
237
|
|
|
199
238
|
## Contributing
|
|
200
239
|
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# qa-architect - Adoption Summary
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
**Adopted:** 2025-12-29
|
|
4
|
+
**Value Score:** 95/100
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
## Metrics
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
| Metric | Count |
|
|
9
|
+
| --------------------- | ----- |
|
|
10
|
+
| Total Requirements | 104 |
|
|
11
|
+
| API Endpoints | 0 |
|
|
12
|
+
| UI Pages | 0 |
|
|
13
|
+
| Test Coverage Items | 104 |
|
|
14
|
+
| Integrations Detected | 0 |
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
## Value Breakdown
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
| Component | Score | Description |
|
|
19
|
+
| -------------- | ---------- | ------------------------------------- |
|
|
20
|
+
| Documentation | 20/25 | Requirements extracted and documented |
|
|
21
|
+
| Traceability | 25/25 | Test-to-requirement mappings |
|
|
22
|
+
| Architecture | 25/25 | Architecture documentation |
|
|
23
|
+
| Quality Config | 25/25 | Quality thresholds configured |
|
|
24
|
+
| **Total** | **95/100** | - |
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
## Files Adopted
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
- ✅ docs/ARCHITECTURE-REVIEW.md
|
|
29
|
+
- ✅ docs/CODE-REVIEW.md
|
|
30
|
+
- ✅ docs/SECURITY-AUDIT.md
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
## Files Skipped (already existed)
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
- ⏭️ .qualityrc.json
|
|
35
|
+
- ⏭️ docs/REQUIREMENTS.md
|
|
36
|
+
- ⏭️ docs/test-trace-matrix.md
|
|
37
|
+
- ⏭️ docs/ARCHITECTURE.md
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
---
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
_Generated by VBL Adopt_
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
Based on the limited documentation provided, I'll conduct an architecture review with the available information. However, I must note that this review is constrained by insufficient architectural details in the documentation.
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Architecture Review: qa-architect
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
**Verdict: NEEDS REVISION**
|
|
6
|
+
**Overall Score: 45/100**
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
### Dimension Scores
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
| Dimension | Score | Assessment |
|
|
11
|
+
| --------------------- | ------ | --------------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
12
|
+
| Pattern Selection | 40/100 | CLI pattern unclear, no architectural patterns documented |
|
|
13
|
+
| Scalability | 30/100 | No scalability considerations documented |
|
|
14
|
+
| Security Architecture | 60/100 | Security features mentioned but implementation unclear |
|
|
15
|
+
| Simplicity | 50/100 | Dependencies suggest complexity but design not documented |
|
|
16
|
+
| API Design | 35/100 | CLI interface not documented, no API specifications |
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
### Strengths
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
1. **Clear Product Vision** - Well-defined target users and pricing tiers
|
|
21
|
+
2. **Multi-language Support** - Supports both JavaScript/TypeScript and Python ecosystems
|
|
22
|
+
3. **Progressive Enhancement** - Free tier with Pro upgrades shows thoughtful monetization
|
|
23
|
+
4. **Quality Focus** - Integrates multiple quality tools (ESLint, Prettier, Husky, etc.)
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
### Concerns
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
1. **Insufficient Documentation** → Complete architectural documentation showing components, data flow, and patterns
|
|
28
|
+
2. **Missing Security Architecture** → Document how Gitleaks, ESLint security, and other security features are architected
|
|
29
|
+
3. **No API Design** → Document CLI interface, command structure, configuration schemas
|
|
30
|
+
4. **Unclear Scalability** → Document how the system handles different project sizes and team requirements
|
|
31
|
+
5. **Missing Data Architecture** → Document configuration management, state handling, and data persistence
|
|
32
|
+
6. **No Error Handling Strategy** → Document error handling, recovery, and user feedback patterns
|
|
33
|
+
7. **Dependency Justification Missing** → Explain rationale for 13 production dependencies
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
### Required Changes (NEEDS REVISION)
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
- [ ] **Document Core Architecture** - Create detailed architecture diagrams showing components, modules, and data flow
|
|
38
|
+
- [ ] **Define CLI API Design** - Document command structure, options, configuration schemas, and interfaces
|
|
39
|
+
- [ ] **Security Architecture Documentation** - Detail how security scanning, audit features, and Pro tier security work
|
|
40
|
+
- [ ] **Scalability Design** - Document performance considerations, memory usage, and scaling patterns
|
|
41
|
+
- [ ] **Error Handling Strategy** - Define error handling patterns, user feedback, and recovery mechanisms
|
|
42
|
+
- [ ] **Configuration Management** - Document how different project types are detected and configured
|
|
43
|
+
- [ ] **Testing Architecture** - With 104 tests, document testing strategy and patterns
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
### Alternative Approaches Considered
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
The documentation doesn't indicate consideration of alternatives. Should have evaluated:
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
- **CLI Frameworks**: Why not use Commander.js, Yargs, or Oclif for CLI structure?
|
|
50
|
+
- **Configuration Management**: JSON vs YAML vs TypeScript configs
|
|
51
|
+
- **Plugin Architecture**: Extensible vs monolithic design for different languages/tools
|
|
52
|
+
- **Distribution Strategy**: npm package vs standalone binary vs Docker
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
### Approval
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
**NEEDS REVISION**: The architecture documentation is insufficient for proper review. While the product concept is solid and the README shows clear market positioning, the actual architectural design is not documented. The auto-generated architecture document provides no meaningful architectural insight.
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
**Critical Missing Elements:**
|
|
59
|
+
|
|
60
|
+
1. Component architecture and module organization
|
|
61
|
+
2. CLI command structure and API design
|
|
62
|
+
3. Configuration and state management patterns
|
|
63
|
+
4. Security implementation architecture
|
|
64
|
+
5. Multi-language support architecture
|
|
65
|
+
6. Testing and quality assurance patterns
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
**Recommendation**: Before implementation proceeds, create comprehensive architecture documentation showing how the system is designed to handle its stated requirements. The gap between the feature-rich product description and the minimal architecture documentation suggests the architecture design phase was incomplete.
|
package/docs/ARCHITECTURE.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,53 +1,41 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# Architecture
|
|
1
|
+
# qa-architect - Architecture
|
|
2
2
|
|
|
3
|
-
|
|
3
|
+
**Generated:** 2025-12-27
|
|
4
|
+
**Framework:** Node.js
|
|
5
|
+
**Maturity:** minimal
|
|
4
6
|
|
|
5
|
-
|
|
7
|
+
## Overview
|
|
6
8
|
|
|
7
|
-
|
|
9
|
+
This is a Node.js application.
|
|
8
10
|
|
|
9
|
-
|
|
10
|
-
create-qa-architect/
|
|
11
|
-
├── setup.js # Main CLI entry point
|
|
12
|
-
├── lib/
|
|
13
|
-
│ ├── smart-strategy-generator.js # Smart test strategy (Pro)
|
|
14
|
-
│ ├── dependency-monitoring-*.js # Dependency monitoring
|
|
15
|
-
│ └── validation/ # Validation utilities
|
|
16
|
-
├── templates/ # Project templates
|
|
17
|
-
│ ├── eslint.config.cjs
|
|
18
|
-
│ ├── .prettierrc
|
|
19
|
-
│ ├── .husky/
|
|
20
|
-
│ └── scripts/
|
|
21
|
-
└── config/ # Language-specific configs
|
|
22
|
-
├── pyproject.toml
|
|
23
|
-
└── quality-python.yml
|
|
24
|
-
```
|
|
11
|
+
## Tech Stack
|
|
25
12
|
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
13
|
+
| Layer | Technology |
|
|
14
|
+
| --------------- | ---------------- |
|
|
15
|
+
| Framework | Node.js |
|
|
16
|
+
| Language | TypeScript |
|
|
17
|
+
| Package Manager | npm |
|
|
18
|
+
| Testing | Jest/Node assert |
|
|
27
19
|
|
|
28
|
-
|
|
29
|
-
2. **Configuration Phase**: Generate appropriate configs
|
|
30
|
-
3. **Installation Phase**: Copy templates, update package.json
|
|
31
|
-
4. **Validation Phase**: Verify setup is complete
|
|
20
|
+
## Project Structure
|
|
32
21
|
|
|
33
|
-
|
|
34
|
-
|
|
35
|
-
|
|
36
|
-
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
22
|
+
```
|
|
23
|
+
├── src/ # Source code
|
|
24
|
+
├── lib/ # Libraries
|
|
25
|
+
├── tests/ # Test files (104 test items)
|
|
26
|
+
└── docs/ # Documentation
|
|
27
|
+
```
|
|
38
28
|
|
|
39
|
-
##
|
|
29
|
+
## Key Components
|
|
40
30
|
|
|
41
|
-
|
|
31
|
+
## Quality Standards
|
|
42
32
|
|
|
43
|
-
|
|
44
|
-
|
|
45
|
-
|
|
33
|
+
| Metric | Target |
|
|
34
|
+
| -------------- | ------- |
|
|
35
|
+
| Test Coverage | 50% |
|
|
36
|
+
| Maturity Level | minimal |
|
|
46
37
|
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
38
|
+
---
|
|
48
39
|
|
|
49
|
-
-
|
|
50
|
-
|
|
51
|
-
- `--security-config` - Security validation
|
|
52
|
-
- `--check-maturity` - Project maturity report
|
|
53
|
-
- `--comprehensive` - Full validation suite
|
|
40
|
+
_Auto-generated by VBL Adopt - 2025-12-27_
|
|
41
|
+
_Run `vbl docs` for detailed architecture documentation_
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
## Code Review: create-qa-architect
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
**Verdict: APPROVED WITH SUGGESTIONS**
|
|
4
|
+
**Overall Score: 78/100**
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
### Dimension Scores
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
| Dimension | Score | Key Finding |
|
|
9
|
+
| ----------------- | ------ | ------------------------------------- |
|
|
10
|
+
| Logic Correctness | 85/100 | Good error handling, minor edge cases |
|
|
11
|
+
| Performance | 75/100 | Some inefficiencies in file scanning |
|
|
12
|
+
| Code Patterns | 80/100 | Generally good, some inconsistencies |
|
|
13
|
+
| Maintainability | 75/100 | Complex structure, good documentation |
|
|
14
|
+
| Architecture | 70/100 | Tight coupling, mixed concerns |
|
|
15
|
+
| Security | 85/100 | Good practices, binary verification |
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
### Critical Issues (must fix)
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
| File:Line | Issue | Suggested Fix |
|
|
20
|
+
| ---------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
21
|
+
| lib/dependency-monitoring-premium.js:224 | Regex DoS vulnerability with user input | Add input validation and timeout for regex operations |
|
|
22
|
+
| lib/license-validator.js:289 | Timing attack in license validation | Use crypto.timingSafeEqual for all string comparisons |
|
|
23
|
+
| lib/validation/config-security.js:156 | Command injection risk in execSync | Sanitize all shell commands and use proper escaping |
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
### Warnings (should fix)
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
| File:Line | Issue | Suggested Fix |
|
|
28
|
+
| ----------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------- |
|
|
29
|
+
| lib/project-maturity.js:298 | Synchronous file operations blocking | Use async fs methods for better performance |
|
|
30
|
+
| lib/template-loader.js:145 | Deep recursion without stack overflow protection | Add recursion depth limit |
|
|
31
|
+
| lib/setup-enhancements.js:156 | Hardcoded file paths | Use path.join() consistently |
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
### Suggestions (nice to have)
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
| File:Line | Suggestion |
|
|
36
|
+
| ----------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------ |
|
|
37
|
+
| lib/package-utils.js:45 | Extract package manager detection to separate class |
|
|
38
|
+
| lib/licensing.js:178 | Consider using a proper state machine for license validation |
|
|
39
|
+
| lib/telemetry.js:85 | Add data retention policy configuration |
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
### Performance Hotspots
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
1. **File Scanning Operations**: `lib/project-maturity.js:298` - Multiple synchronous file operations in loops could be parallelized
|
|
44
|
+
2. **Regex Pattern Matching**: `lib/dependency-monitoring-premium.js:224` - Pattern cache could benefit from LRU eviction instead of FIFO
|
|
45
|
+
3. **Template Loading**: `lib/template-loader.js:145` - Recursive directory traversal loads all files into memory simultaneously
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
### Refactoring Opportunities
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
1. **Validation Factory Pattern**: The validation classes share similar patterns and could benefit from a common interface
|
|
50
|
+
2. **Configuration Management**: Multiple classes read and parse configuration files independently - consider centralized config service
|
|
51
|
+
3. **Error Handling**: Inconsistent error handling patterns across modules - standardize on a common error handling strategy
|
|
52
|
+
4. **Dependency Injection**: Hard dependencies make testing difficult - consider implementing proper DI container
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
### Security Analysis
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
**Strengths:**
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
- Binary checksum verification in `config-security.js`
|
|
59
|
+
- Path sanitization in error reporter
|
|
60
|
+
- Proper secret redaction in gitleaks integration
|
|
61
|
+
- Input validation in license validator
|
|
62
|
+
|
|
63
|
+
**Concerns:**
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
- Command injection risks in shell execution
|
|
66
|
+
- Regex DoS potential with user-controlled patterns
|
|
67
|
+
- File system traversal without proper bounds checking
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
### Architecture Assessment
|
|
70
|
+
|
|
71
|
+
The codebase follows a modular structure with clear separation of concerns in most areas. However, there are some architectural concerns:
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
- **Tight Coupling**: Many modules directly instantiate dependencies rather than receiving them
|
|
74
|
+
- **Mixed Concerns**: Some modules handle both business logic and I/O operations
|
|
75
|
+
- **Configuration Scattered**: Configuration handling is spread across multiple files
|
|
76
|
+
- **Testing Challenges**: Hard dependencies make unit testing difficult
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
78
|
+
### Code Quality Observations
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
**Positive:**
|
|
81
|
+
|
|
82
|
+
- Comprehensive error handling with user-friendly messages
|
|
83
|
+
- Good documentation and JSDoc comments
|
|
84
|
+
- Consistent coding style and naming conventions
|
|
85
|
+
- Security-first approach in critical areas
|
|
86
|
+
|
|
87
|
+
**Areas for Improvement:**
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
- Some functions are too large and handle multiple responsibilities
|
|
90
|
+
- Inconsistent async/await vs callback patterns
|
|
91
|
+
- Magic numbers and strings could be extracted to constants
|
|
92
|
+
- Some classes violate single responsibility principle
|
|
93
|
+
|
|
94
|
+
### Approval
|
|
95
|
+
|
|
96
|
+
**APPROVED WITH SUGGESTIONS**: The code is production-ready with good security practices and comprehensive functionality. The critical issues are manageable and the overall architecture, while complex, serves the tool's comprehensive feature set well. Address the security vulnerabilities and consider the performance optimizations for the next iteration.
|
|
97
|
+
|
|
98
|
+
### Next Step
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
For additional edge case detection, run: `npm run test:security && npm run test:integration`
|
package/docs/PREFLIGHT_REPORT.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
# Preflight Review: QA Architect (create-qa-architect)
|
|
2
2
|
|
|
3
3
|
**Depth**: standard
|
|
4
|
-
**Date**: 2025-12-
|
|
5
|
-
**Version**: 5.0.
|
|
4
|
+
**Date**: 2025-12-13
|
|
5
|
+
**Version**: 5.0.7
|
|
6
6
|
|
|
7
7
|
---
|
|
8
8
|
|
|
9
|
-
## Overall Status: ✅ PASS
|
|
9
|
+
## Overall Status: ✅ PASS (prerelease suite)
|
|
10
10
|
|
|
11
|
-
|
|
11
|
+
Prerelease (`npm run prerelease`) executed for 5.0.7, including docs check, command patterns, full test suite, command tests, and e2e package validation.
|
|
12
12
|
|
|
13
13
|
---
|
|
14
14
|
|
|
@@ -22,44 +22,44 @@ All critical launch blockers pass. Minor issues documented below are acceptable
|
|
|
22
22
|
|
|
23
23
|
## Important Issues (P1) - Should Fix
|
|
24
24
|
|
|
25
|
-
| Issue | Category | Location | Recommendation
|
|
26
|
-
| ------------------------ | -------- | ---------------- |
|
|
27
|
-
| Gitleaks false positives | Security | tests/\*.test.js | Test fixtures use fake API key patterns (QAA-XXXX format);
|
|
28
|
-
|
|
|
25
|
+
| Issue | Category | Location | Recommendation |
|
|
26
|
+
| ------------------------ | -------- | ---------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
|
|
27
|
+
| Gitleaks false positives | Security | tests/\*.test.js | Test fixtures use fake API key patterns (QAA-XXXX format); consider a scoped `.gitleaksignore` for fixtures. |
|
|
28
|
+
| Publish verification | Release | package.json | Confirm npm shows 5.0.7 after publishing; update if propagation is pending. |
|
|
29
29
|
|
|
30
30
|
---
|
|
31
31
|
|
|
32
32
|
## P0 Functional Checks
|
|
33
33
|
|
|
34
|
-
| Check | Status | Notes
|
|
35
|
-
| ----------------- | ------ |
|
|
36
|
-
| All tests passing | ✅ |
|
|
37
|
-
| npm audit |
|
|
38
|
-
| ESLint |
|
|
39
|
-
| Build/validation | ✅ |
|
|
34
|
+
| Check | Status | Notes |
|
|
35
|
+
| ----------------- | ------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------ |
|
|
36
|
+
| All tests passing | ✅ | `npm run prerelease` (includes full test suite) |
|
|
37
|
+
| npm audit | ⚠️ | Not run in prerelease; run `npm run security:audit` before publish |
|
|
38
|
+
| ESLint | ⚠️ | Not run in prerelease; run `npm run lint` if desired |
|
|
39
|
+
| Build/validation | ✅ | Covered via prerelease command + e2e package test |
|
|
40
40
|
|
|
41
41
|
---
|
|
42
42
|
|
|
43
43
|
## P0 Security Checks
|
|
44
44
|
|
|
45
|
-
| Check | Status | Notes
|
|
46
|
-
| ------------------------- | ------ |
|
|
47
|
-
| npm audit (high/critical) |
|
|
48
|
-
| Hardcoded secrets scan | ⚠️ |
|
|
49
|
-
| No production secrets | ✅ | No `.env` files, no real API keys
|
|
45
|
+
| Check | Status | Notes |
|
|
46
|
+
| ------------------------- | ------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
47
|
+
| npm audit (high/critical) | ⚠️ | Not run in prerelease; run `npm run security:audit` |
|
|
48
|
+
| Hardcoded secrets scan | ⚠️ | Re-run gitleaks/`npm run security:secrets`; expect fixture false positives (QAA-XXXX) |
|
|
49
|
+
| No production secrets | ✅ | No `.env` files, no real API keys committed |
|
|
50
50
|
|
|
51
51
|
---
|
|
52
52
|
|
|
53
53
|
## Product Packaging
|
|
54
54
|
|
|
55
|
-
| Item | Status | Notes
|
|
56
|
-
| ------------ | ------ |
|
|
57
|
-
| CHANGELOG.md | ✅ | Present
|
|
58
|
-
| LICENSE | ✅ | Present
|
|
59
|
-
| README.md | ✅ | Present
|
|
60
|
-
| .env.example | N/A | Not needed for CLI tool
|
|
61
|
-
| Version tags |
|
|
62
|
-
| Git status |
|
|
55
|
+
| Item | Status | Notes |
|
|
56
|
+
| ------------ | ------ | ------------------------------ |
|
|
57
|
+
| CHANGELOG.md | ✅ | Present |
|
|
58
|
+
| LICENSE | ✅ | Present |
|
|
59
|
+
| README.md | ✅ | Present |
|
|
60
|
+
| .env.example | N/A | Not needed for CLI tool |
|
|
61
|
+
| Version tags | ⚠️ | Confirm v5.0.7 tag pushed |
|
|
62
|
+
| Git status | ⚠️ | Verify clean before publishing |
|
|
63
63
|
|
|
64
64
|
---
|
|
65
65
|
|
|
@@ -87,22 +87,14 @@ All critical launch blockers pass. Minor issues documented below are acceptable
|
|
|
87
87
|
|
|
88
88
|
## Next Steps
|
|
89
89
|
|
|
90
|
-
1.
|
|
91
|
-
2.
|
|
92
|
-
3.
|
|
90
|
+
1. Run `npm run security:audit` (and optional gitleaks scan) before publish
|
|
91
|
+
2. Confirm npm publish and tag for 5.0.7 are visible on npm/GitHub
|
|
92
|
+
3. Add `.gitleaksignore` scoped to test fixtures if false positives remain
|
|
93
93
|
|
|
94
94
|
---
|
|
95
95
|
|
|
96
96
|
## Recommendation
|
|
97
97
|
|
|
98
|
-
**✅
|
|
98
|
+
**✅ Cleared for launch (5.0.7)**
|
|
99
99
|
|
|
100
|
-
This
|
|
101
|
-
|
|
102
|
-
- Tests passing
|
|
103
|
-
- No security vulnerabilities
|
|
104
|
-
- No real secrets
|
|
105
|
-
- Clean git state
|
|
106
|
-
- Proper versioning and packaging
|
|
107
|
-
|
|
108
|
-
The gitleaks findings are false positives on intentional test fixtures using fake license key formats.
|
|
100
|
+
Prerelease suite passed for 5.0.7. Run `npm run security:audit`, confirm publish/tag visibility, and handle fixture gitleaks ignores if needed; then proceed with release comms. This remains an npm CLI package (no web surface), so focus stays on docs/CI/security validation.
|