create-pathfinder 1.3.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (62) hide show
  1. package/AGENTS.md +7 -0
  2. package/CLAUDE.md +71 -0
  3. package/LICENSE +21 -0
  4. package/README.md +60 -0
  5. package/bin/create-pathfinder.mjs +8 -0
  6. package/context/ai-interaction.md +76 -0
  7. package/context/coding-standards.md +72 -0
  8. package/context/current-feature.md +46 -0
  9. package/context/features/example-feature-spec.md +99 -0
  10. package/context/history.md +14 -0
  11. package/context/learning/learner-profile.md +35 -0
  12. package/context/learning/lessons/.gitkeep +0 -0
  13. package/context/learning/progress.md +28 -0
  14. package/context/project-overview.md +198 -0
  15. package/copy-list.json +11 -0
  16. package/package.json +51 -0
  17. package/prompts/01-kickstart-project.md +1 -0
  18. package/prompts/01-teach-current-feature.md +9 -0
  19. package/prompts/02-debate-me.md +1 -0
  20. package/prompts/02-quiz-current-feature.md +7 -0
  21. package/prompts/03-challenge-current-feature.md +7 -0
  22. package/prompts/03-prototype.md +1 -0
  23. package/prompts/04-teach-current-architecture.md +7 -0
  24. package/prompts/04-to-specs.md +1 -0
  25. package/prompts/05-learning-review.md +5 -0
  26. package/prompts/05-load-feature.md +1 -0
  27. package/prompts/06-start-feature.md +1 -0
  28. package/prompts/07-review-feature.md +1 -0
  29. package/prompts/08-complete-feature.md +1 -0
  30. package/prompts/09-learn-feature.md +1 -0
  31. package/prompts/10-learn-codebase.md +1 -0
  32. package/prompts/11-handoff.md +1 -0
  33. package/prompts/12-skillsmith.md +1 -0
  34. package/prompts/13-reverse-engineer.md +18 -0
  35. package/prompts/14-reflect.md +13 -0
  36. package/skills/challenge-me/SKILL.md +81 -0
  37. package/skills/complete-feature/SKILL.md +17 -0
  38. package/skills/debate-me/SKILL.md +82 -0
  39. package/skills/handoff/SKILL.md +12 -0
  40. package/skills/kickstart-pathfinder/SKILL.md +49 -0
  41. package/skills/learn-codebase/SKILL.md +33 -0
  42. package/skills/learn-feature/SKILL.md +48 -0
  43. package/skills/learning-review/SKILL.md +76 -0
  44. package/skills/load-feature/SKILL.md +17 -0
  45. package/skills/prototype/SKILL.md +46 -0
  46. package/skills/quiz-me/SKILL.md +78 -0
  47. package/skills/reflect/SKILL.md +481 -0
  48. package/skills/reverse-engineer/SKILL.md +252 -0
  49. package/skills/review-feature/SKILL.md +25 -0
  50. package/skills/skillsmith/SKILL.md +14 -0
  51. package/skills/start-feature/SKILL.md +25 -0
  52. package/skills/teach-architecture/SKILL.md +79 -0
  53. package/skills/teach-feature/SKILL.md +110 -0
  54. package/skills/to-specs/SKILL.md +45 -0
  55. package/src/cli.mjs +156 -0
  56. package/src/install.mjs +99 -0
  57. package/src/kit.mjs +94 -0
  58. package/templates/CHANGELOG.template.md +11 -0
  59. package/templates/feature-spec.template.md +99 -0
  60. package/templates/lesson.template.md +71 -0
  61. package/templates/progress-entry.template.md +23 -0
  62. package/templates/project-overview.template.md +198 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: learn-feature
3
+ description: Generate a rich, interactive, feature-scoped lesson and quiz from completed implementation.
4
+ ---
5
+
6
+ # Learn Feature
7
+
8
+ Use after a feature is completed and accepted.
9
+
10
+ ## Read
11
+
12
+ - completed feature spec and history entry
13
+ - relevant diff/commits when available
14
+ - only the implemented files and direct dependencies needed to explain the feature
15
+ - tests and durable decisions
16
+
17
+ ## Output Format
18
+
19
+ Use the project's learning preference. Default to self-contained HTML/CSS/JS. Use MDX only when the repository already supports it or the human selects it.
20
+
21
+ Place output under:
22
+
23
+ ```text
24
+ learning/features/[feature-slug]/
25
+ ```
26
+
27
+ ## Lesson Content
28
+
29
+ - what changed and why
30
+ - architecture and data/control flow
31
+ - important files and responsibilities
32
+ - key implementation decisions and tradeoffs
33
+ - tests and verification
34
+ - common mistakes and safe extension points
35
+ - visual diagrams or interactive demonstrations when useful
36
+
37
+ ## Quiz Variety
38
+
39
+ Include a useful mix when appropriate:
40
+
41
+ - multiple choice
42
+ - true/false with explanation
43
+ - ordering or matching
44
+ - predict-the-output/state
45
+ - debugging scenario
46
+ - short reflection or implementation challenge
47
+
48
+ Provide immediate feedback and explanations. Keep the lesson scoped and avoid reading the whole repository.
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: learning-review
3
+ description: Review accumulated lessons and evidence, identify durable strengths and gaps, and create a focused reinforcement plan.
4
+ argument-hint: feature|weekly|interview|concept
5
+ ---
6
+
7
+ # Learning Review
8
+
9
+ Use this skill periodically, not after every tiny change.
10
+
11
+ The goal is to turn isolated feature lessons into a coherent learning path.
12
+
13
+ ## Read First
14
+
15
+ 1. `context/learning/learner-profile.md`
16
+ 2. `context/learning/progress.md`
17
+ 3. Recent lessons under `context/learning/lessons/`
18
+ 4. Recent completed feature specs and history
19
+ 5. Quiz or challenge evidence available in the repo
20
+
21
+ ## Review Modes
22
+
23
+ ### feature
24
+
25
+ Review all learning evidence for one feature.
26
+
27
+ ### weekly
28
+
29
+ Summarize recent concepts, repeated gaps, and one reinforcement plan.
30
+
31
+ ### interview
32
+
33
+ Translate demonstrated project experience into interview-ready stories and identify claims that are not yet supported by evidence.
34
+
35
+ ### concept
36
+
37
+ Review one concept across several features to determine whether understanding transfers.
38
+
39
+ ## Output
40
+
41
+ Return:
42
+
43
+ ## Demonstrated Strengths
44
+
45
+ Only claims supported by evidence.
46
+
47
+ ## Developing Areas
48
+
49
+ Where understanding is partial or assisted.
50
+
51
+ ## Misconceptions or Missing Evidence
52
+
53
+ Be direct and specific.
54
+
55
+ ## Connections Across Features
56
+
57
+ Show how concepts reinforce each other.
58
+
59
+ ## Interview Stories
60
+
61
+ For relevant work, produce concise STAR-style outlines without inventing business impact.
62
+
63
+ ## Next Three Learning Moves
64
+
65
+ At most three, ordered by value.
66
+
67
+ ## Progress Changes
68
+
69
+ Update `context/learning/progress.md` conservatively.
70
+
71
+ ## Rules
72
+
73
+ - Do not equate code generated by an agent with knowledge demonstrated by the learner.
74
+ - Do not create a giant curriculum.
75
+ - Do not assign busywork.
76
+ - Prefer reinforcement through upcoming product features.
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: load-feature
3
+ description: Prepare one feature for implementation by checking readiness, context size, dependencies, and delivery chunks.
4
+ ---
5
+
6
+ # Load Feature
7
+
8
+ 1. Select the requested or next approved feature spec.
9
+ 2. Read its dependencies and the smallest relevant durable context.
10
+ 3. Check repository reality without scanning unrelated areas.
11
+ 4. Identify contradictions, missing decisions, stale paths, and prototype dependencies.
12
+ 5. Assess whether the feature fits a focused LLM context window.
13
+ 6. Split or revise it before implementation if the context is too broad.
14
+ 7. Populate `context/current-feature.md` with the feature, first delivery chunk, context boundary, assumptions, Git state, definition of done, and out-of-scope work.
15
+ 8. Present a short readiness summary.
16
+
17
+ Do not implement, create Git history, or resolve `TBD` decisions silently.
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: prototype
3
+ description: Create and iterate the cheapest useful artifact for validating a product, interaction, architecture, or technical assumption.
4
+ ---
5
+
6
+ # Prototype
7
+
8
+ Use this skill after debate recommends validation or when the human asks to see or test a direction before production planning.
9
+
10
+ ## Process
11
+
12
+ 1. Read the debate conclusion and relevant project context.
13
+ 2. Name the single primary assumption being validated.
14
+ 3. Recommend the cheapest useful prototype format.
15
+ 4. Define success/rejection criteria and an output location under `prototypes/`.
16
+ 5. Create only the prototype; avoid production architecture unless the task is explicitly a technical proof.
17
+ 6. Present focused review questions.
18
+ 7. On feedback, revise the same direction, replace it, approve it, or stop.
19
+ 8. Record approved direction, rejected assumptions, and explicit production exclusions in `context/project-overview.md`.
20
+
21
+ ## Supported Forms
22
+
23
+ - wireframe or user-flow diagram
24
+ - static visual concept
25
+ - interactive HTML/CSS/JS
26
+ - prototype using an already-installed project stack
27
+ - API/integration/AI/animation/offline proof of concept
28
+ - architecture or data-flow diagram
29
+
30
+ Do not install a framework solely for a prototype without approval.
31
+
32
+ ## Human Review
33
+
34
+ Ask:
35
+
36
+ - Is the purpose or tested assumption clear?
37
+ - Is the main flow/behavior correct?
38
+ - What should be removed, revised, or replaced?
39
+ - Is the direction approved for specification?
40
+
41
+ ## Rules
42
+
43
+ - Prototype only what needs validation.
44
+ - Label shortcuts and mocked behavior.
45
+ - Do not silently promote prototype code into production.
46
+ - Iterate rather than generating unrelated alternatives unless replacement is requested.
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: quiz-me
3
+ description: Assess understanding of a recently taught feature using varied, evidence-based questions and targeted feedback.
4
+ argument-hint: optional lesson path or feature name
5
+ ---
6
+
7
+ # Quiz Me
8
+
9
+ Use this skill after `teach-feature`, or when the user wants to test understanding of a feature or concept.
10
+
11
+ The goal is retrieval and diagnosis, not entertainment and not a long exam.
12
+
13
+ ## Read First
14
+
15
+ 1. `context/learning/learner-profile.md`
16
+ 2. The relevant lesson in `context/learning/lessons/`
17
+ 3. `context/current-feature.md`
18
+ 4. Only the implementation or tests needed to verify answers
19
+ 5. `context/learning/progress.md`
20
+
21
+ ## Quiz Shape
22
+
23
+ Create 5 questions by default. Mix at least three formats:
24
+
25
+ - Predict what happens
26
+ - Explain why a decision was made
27
+ - Trace data or event flow
28
+ - Find or diagnose a bug
29
+ - Choose between architectural alternatives
30
+ - Identify an accessibility or performance risk
31
+ - Interpret a focused code excerpt
32
+ - Explain how a test proves behavior
33
+
34
+ Avoid:
35
+
36
+ - pure trivia
37
+ - questions answerable only by memorizing file names
38
+ - five multiple-choice questions
39
+ - ambiguous questions without a defensible answer
40
+ - testing concepts not present in the lesson or code
41
+
42
+ ## Delivery
43
+
44
+ Ask one question at a time.
45
+
46
+ After each answer:
47
+
48
+ 1. Mark it as correct, partially correct, or incorrect.
49
+ 2. Explain the key point concisely.
50
+ 3. Ask one targeted follow-up only when it will diagnose a meaningful gap.
51
+ 4. Continue to the next question.
52
+
53
+ Do not reveal all answers before the learner responds.
54
+
55
+ ## Scoring
56
+
57
+ At the end, report:
58
+
59
+ - Strong understanding
60
+ - Partial understanding
61
+ - Gaps to reinforce
62
+ - One recommended next action
63
+
64
+ Do not use a percentage unless every question had a clear scoring basis.
65
+
66
+ ## Progress Update
67
+
68
+ Update `context/learning/progress.md` with demonstrated evidence.
69
+
70
+ Use the confidence scale already defined there.
71
+
72
+ A correct answer with heavy hints is `practiced`, not `independent`.
73
+
74
+ ## Scope
75
+
76
+ - Do not change product code.
77
+ - Do not inflate the quiz to cover the whole stack.
78
+ - Do not treat one quiz as proof of mastery.