create-nextblock 0.13.9 → 0.13.11

package/templates/nextblock-template/docs/06-CLI-AND-SCAFFOLDING.md

@@ -1,176 +1,176 @@
-# 06 CLI and Scaffolding
-
-## Purpose
-
-`apps/create-nextblock` is the onboarding surface for developers who want a
-standalone NextBlock project without cloning the full monorepo.
-
-The CLI does two main jobs:
-
-- scaffold a package-based project from the current app template
-- activate premium ecommerce routes and dependencies in generated projects
-
-## Source Application vs Template Output
-
-The canonical application is still `apps/nextblock`.
-
-The scaffold template under
-`apps/create-nextblock/templates/nextblock-template` is copied output, not the
-authoritative source. The sync pipeline refreshes that template by copying the
-source app and applying a series of post-copy adjustments.
-
-That means contributor workflow should be:
-
-1. change the source app or shared libraries
-2. update root docs and README entrypoints
-3. run the template sync when you want the generated project to catch up
-
-## CLI Entry Points
-
-`apps/create-nextblock/bin/create-nextblock.js` currently defines:
-
-- `create [project-directory]`
-- `activate [module]`
-
-The default create flow is what powers:
-
-```bash
-npm create nextblock@latest
-```
-
-## What the Create Flow Actually Does
-
-When the CLI creates a project it currently:
-
-1. prompts for a project name unless `--yes` is used
-2. copies `templates/nextblock-template` into the new directory
-3. removes backup artifacts
-4. applies client component and provider adjustments
-5. normalizes block-editor and UI imports
-6. generates UI proxy modules
-7. copies editor utility shims when needed
-8. ensures `.gitignore`, `.env.example`, layout files, and config files are in
-   the expected generated-project shape
-9. rewrites `package.json` away from workspace dependencies and toward published
-   packages
-10. writes a project-level `.npmrc` for public package resolution
-11. optionally installs dependencies
-12. optionally runs the generated-project setup wizard
-13. initializes git
-
-## Package Version Sources
-
-The CLI resolves published package versions from the local monorepo package
-metadata for:
-
-- `@nextblock-cms/ui`
-- `@nextblock-cms/utils`
-- `@nextblock-cms/db`
-- `@nextblock-cms/editor`
-- `@nextblock-cms/sdk`
-
-The ecommerce module is special because activation installs the alias:
-
-```bash
-@nextblock-cms/ecommerce@npm:@nextblock-cms/ecom@latest
-```
-
-That alias matches the current package-name discrepancy documented elsewhere.
-
-## Template Sync Workflow
-
-`apps/create-nextblock/scripts/sync-template.js` is the authoritative source for
-template generation inside the monorepo.
-
-It currently:
-
-- copies `apps/nextblock` into `templates/nextblock-template`
-- skips `node_modules`, `.next`, backups, and other generated folders
-- copies the root `docs/` folder into the template docs directory
-- copies `.env.example` or `.env.exemple`
-- rewrites imports for packaged library consumption
-- removes the copied `project.json`
-- syncs package versions
-- normalizes global styles and UI proxy files
-
-This is why the root docs and root/app README surfaces matter first: the
-template inherits from them later through the sync step.
-
-## Premium Ecommerce Activation
-
-The `activate ecommerce` command does more than add a dependency. It also
-injects route wrappers and supporting files into the generated project so the
-premium module appears as a coherent extension rather than a bare npm install.
-
-The injected surfaces include wrappers for routes such as:
-
-- `/cms/orders`
-- `/cms/products`
-- `/cms/payments`
-- `/checkout/success`
-- `/api/checkout`
-
-Those wrappers use `verifyPackageOnline()` so premium routes stay aligned with
-package activation state.
-
-## Publishing and Release Notes
-
-A generated project installs the libraries from **npm**, so a feature only reaches
-scaffolds after the libs are republished. (The monorepo's own Vercel deploy builds the
-libs from source, so it sees changes immediately — only `npm create` scaffolds need a
-republish.)
-
-### Release commands
-
-- `npm run release:all -- <version>` — build **and publish every package** at one
-  synchronized version, in dependency order: `utils → ui → sdk → db → editor → ecom`,
-  then `release-cli.js` (which stamps the root + template + `create-nextblock`, re-syncs
-  the template, and publishes the CLI). Pass an explicit semver (e.g. `0.10.2`);
-  `--dry-run` prints the plan only.
-- `npm run build:<lib>` (`build:utils|ui|db|editor|sdk|ecom`) and
-  `node tools/scripts/release-lib.js <lib> <version>` — build + publish a **single** lib
-  (`<lib>` is the nx project name, so use `ecommerce`, which maps to the published
-  `@nextblock-cms/ecom`). `npx nx build <lib>` only *compiles*, it does not publish.
-
-### npm 2FA / OTP (and capturing a log)
-
-Publishing requires a one-time password if the npm account has 2FA. **Piping the command
-output breaks the interactive OTP prompt** — `npm run release:all -- … 2>&1 | Tee-Object …`
-(or `| tee`) fails with `npm error code EOTP` because npm no longer has a TTY. Either:
-
-- set an npm **Automation** token (`npm config set //registry.npmjs.org/:_authToken …`),
-  which bypasses 2FA — then piping to a log file is fine; or
-- capture with PowerShell `Start-Transcript -Path release.log; npm run release:all -- … ;
-  Stop-Transcript`, which records the session while npm keeps its terminal.
-
-`release:all` has no "already published" guard: if it dies partway, re-running the same
-version re-publishes from the top and 403s on the first already-published lib. Finish a
-partial release by running the **remaining** libs individually
-(`node tools/scripts/release-lib.js <lib> <version>` … then `release-cli.js <version>`),
-or bump to a fresh version and re-run the whole thing.
-
-### Library build gotchas (dts / tsconfig)
-
-Each lib emits its `.d.ts` via `vite-plugin-dts` running tsc on `tsconfig.lib.json`. When a
-lib imports a sibling (`ui`/`db` import `utils`; `ecom` imports all), how you wire the
-tsconfig decides whether the build log is clean:
-
-- A **composite** lib (`ui`, `db` — `db` inherits it) must **list the imported sibling's
-  sources in `include`** (e.g. `"../utils/src/**/*.ts"`) and keep `"references": []`.
-  Mirror `libs/editor`, which always built clean this way. A composite project
-  `reference` to the sibling triggers `TS6305` ("output not built" — vite never produces
-  the `tsc -b` out-tsc output); empty `references` *without* the `include` triggers
-  `TS6307` ("file not listed"). Both are non-fatal log noise but should stay at zero.
-- A **non-composite** lib (`ecom`, which extends `tsconfig.base.json`) just needs
-  `"references": []` — no `include` of siblings.
-- A **strict** lib (`db`/`sdk` set `noPropertyAccessFromIndexSignature`) compiles the
-  sibling's *source* under its strict rules, so `libs/utils` must stay strict-clean
-  (bracket-access undeclared keys, e.g. `process.env['R2_BUCKET_NAME']`).
-
-`vite-plugin-dts` `entryRoot: 'src'` keeps emission to the lib's own `src`, so listing
-sibling sources does **not** leak their `.d.ts` into the tarball. The published `bin` path
-in `apps/create-nextblock/package.json` should have **no leading `./`** (`bin/…`, not
-`./bin/…`) or npm "auto-corrects" it with a publish warning.
-
-If a generated project looks stale, check the sync script and template output (and whether
-the libs were actually republished) before assuming the source app is missing the feature.
+# 06 CLI and Scaffolding
+
+## Purpose
+
+`apps/create-nextblock` is the onboarding surface for developers who want a
+standalone NextBlock project without cloning the full monorepo.
+
+The CLI does two main jobs:
+
+- scaffold a package-based project from the current app template
+- activate premium ecommerce routes and dependencies in generated projects
+
+## Source Application vs Template Output
+
+The canonical application is still `apps/nextblock`.
+
+The scaffold template under
+`apps/create-nextblock/templates/nextblock-template` is copied output, not the
+authoritative source. The sync pipeline refreshes that template by copying the
+source app and applying a series of post-copy adjustments.
+
+That means contributor workflow should be:
+
+1. change the source app or shared libraries
+2. update root docs and README entrypoints
+3. run the template sync when you want the generated project to catch up
+
+## CLI Entry Points
+
+`apps/create-nextblock/bin/create-nextblock.js` currently defines:
+
+- `create [project-directory]`
+- `activate [module]`
+
+The default create flow is what powers:
+
+```bash
+npm create nextblock@latest
+```
+
+## What the Create Flow Actually Does
+
+When the CLI creates a project it currently:
+
+1. prompts for a project name unless `--yes` is used
+2. copies `templates/nextblock-template` into the new directory
+3. removes backup artifacts
+4. applies client component and provider adjustments
+5. normalizes block-editor and UI imports
+6. generates UI proxy modules
+7. copies editor utility shims when needed
+8. ensures `.gitignore`, `.env.example`, layout files, and config files are in
+   the expected generated-project shape
+9. rewrites `package.json` away from workspace dependencies and toward published
+   packages
+10. writes a project-level `.npmrc` for public package resolution
+11. optionally installs dependencies
+12. optionally runs the generated-project setup wizard
+13. initializes git
+
+## Package Version Sources
+
+The CLI resolves published package versions from the local monorepo package
+metadata for:
+
+- `@nextblock-cms/ui`
+- `@nextblock-cms/utils`
+- `@nextblock-cms/db`
+- `@nextblock-cms/editor`
+- `@nextblock-cms/sdk`
+
+The ecommerce module is special because activation installs the alias:
+
+```bash
+@nextblock-cms/ecommerce@npm:@nextblock-cms/ecom@latest
+```
+
+That alias matches the current package-name discrepancy documented elsewhere.
+
+## Template Sync Workflow
+
+`apps/create-nextblock/scripts/sync-template.js` is the authoritative source for
+template generation inside the monorepo.
+
+It currently:
+
+- copies `apps/nextblock` into `templates/nextblock-template`
+- skips `node_modules`, `.next`, backups, and other generated folders
+- copies the root `docs/` folder into the template docs directory
+- copies `.env.example` or `.env.exemple`
+- rewrites imports for packaged library consumption
+- removes the copied `project.json`
+- syncs package versions
+- normalizes global styles and UI proxy files
+
+This is why the root docs and root/app README surfaces matter first: the
+template inherits from them later through the sync step.
+
+## Premium Ecommerce Activation
+
+The `activate ecommerce` command does more than add a dependency. It also
+injects route wrappers and supporting files into the generated project so the
+premium module appears as a coherent extension rather than a bare npm install.
+
+The injected surfaces include wrappers for routes such as:
+
+- `/cms/orders`
+- `/cms/products`
+- `/cms/payments`
+- `/checkout/success`
+- `/api/checkout`
+
+Those wrappers use `verifyPackageOnline()` so premium routes stay aligned with
+package activation state.
+
+## Publishing and Release Notes
+
+A generated project installs the libraries from **npm**, so a feature only reaches
+scaffolds after the libs are republished. (The monorepo's own Vercel deploy builds the
+libs from source, so it sees changes immediately — only `npm create` scaffolds need a
+republish.)
+
+### Release commands
+
+- `npm run release:all -- <version>` — build **and publish every package** at one
+  synchronized version, in dependency order: `utils → ui → sdk → db → editor → ecom`,
+  then `release-cli.js` (which stamps the root + template + `create-nextblock`, re-syncs
+  the template, and publishes the CLI). Pass an explicit semver (e.g. `0.10.2`);
+  `--dry-run` prints the plan only.
+- `npm run build:<lib>` (`build:utils|ui|db|editor|sdk|ecom`) and
+  `node tools/scripts/release-lib.js <lib> <version>` — build + publish a **single** lib
+  (`<lib>` is the nx project name, so use `ecommerce`, which maps to the published
+  `@nextblock-cms/ecom`). `npx nx build <lib>` only *compiles*, it does not publish.
+
+### npm 2FA / OTP (and capturing a log)
+
+Publishing requires a one-time password if the npm account has 2FA. **Piping the command
+output breaks the interactive OTP prompt** — `npm run release:all -- … 2>&1 | Tee-Object …`
+(or `| tee`) fails with `npm error code EOTP` because npm no longer has a TTY. Either:
+
+- set an npm **Automation** token (`npm config set //registry.npmjs.org/:_authToken …`),
+  which bypasses 2FA — then piping to a log file is fine; or
+- capture with PowerShell `Start-Transcript -Path release.log; npm run release:all -- … ;
+  Stop-Transcript`, which records the session while npm keeps its terminal.
+
+`release:all` has no "already published" guard: if it dies partway, re-running the same
+version re-publishes from the top and 403s on the first already-published lib. Finish a
+partial release by running the **remaining** libs individually
+(`node tools/scripts/release-lib.js <lib> <version>` … then `release-cli.js <version>`),
+or bump to a fresh version and re-run the whole thing.
+
+### Library build gotchas (dts / tsconfig)
+
+Each lib emits its `.d.ts` via `vite-plugin-dts` running tsc on `tsconfig.lib.json`. When a
+lib imports a sibling (`ui`/`db` import `utils`; `ecom` imports all), how you wire the
+tsconfig decides whether the build log is clean:
+
+- A **composite** lib (`ui`, `db` — `db` inherits it) must **list the imported sibling's
+  sources in `include`** (e.g. `"../utils/src/**/*.ts"`) and keep `"references": []`.
+  Mirror `libs/editor`, which always built clean this way. A composite project
+  `reference` to the sibling triggers `TS6305` ("output not built" — vite never produces
+  the `tsc -b` out-tsc output); empty `references` *without* the `include` triggers
+  `TS6307` ("file not listed"). Both are non-fatal log noise but should stay at zero.
+- A **non-composite** lib (`ecom`, which extends `tsconfig.base.json`) just needs
+  `"references": []` — no `include` of siblings.
+- A **strict** lib (`db`/`sdk` set `noPropertyAccessFromIndexSignature`) compiles the
+  sibling's *source* under its strict rules, so `libs/utils` must stay strict-clean
+  (bracket-access undeclared keys, e.g. `process.env['R2_BUCKET_NAME']`).
+
+`vite-plugin-dts` `entryRoot: 'src'` keeps emission to the lib's own `src`, so listing
+sibling sources does **not** leak their `.d.ts` into the tarball. The published `bin` path
+in `apps/create-nextblock/package.json` should have **no leading `./`** (`bin/…`, not
+`./bin/…`) or npm "auto-corrects" it with a publish warning.
+
+If a generated project looks stale, check the sync script and template output (and whether
+the libs were actually republished) before assuming the source app is missing the feature.

package/templates/nextblock-template/docs/07-BLOCK-SDK-AND-EXTENSIBILITY.md

@@ -1,146 +1,146 @@
-# 07 Block SDK and Extensibility
-
-## What the SDK Is
-
-`libs/sdk` is the typed contract for block-style extensibility. It is much
-smaller than the in-app block registry because it defines an external authoring
-interface, not the full CMS implementation.
-
-The main export is:
-
-- `@nextblock-cms/sdk`
-
-## Current SDK Surface
-
-`libs/sdk/src/lib/sdk.ts` currently exports the following core types:
-
-- `BlockContentSchema`
-- `BlockData<TSchema>`
-- `BlockProps<TSchema>`
-- `BlockEditorProps<TSchema>`
-- `BlockConfig<TSchema>`
-- `LucideIcon`
-
-## Contract Shape
-
-### Schema
-
-Every block is defined around a Zod object schema:
-
-```ts
-type BlockContentSchema = z.ZodObject<any>;
-```
-
-The runtime content type is inferred from that schema through `BlockData`.
-
-### Renderer contract
-
-The public rendering contract is:
-
-- `content`
-- optional `className`
-- `isInEditor`
-- `languageKey`
-
-### Editor contract
-
-The editing contract is:
-
-- `content`
-- `block`
-- `onChange`
-
-### Registration contract
-
-A block registration object currently requires:
-
-- `type`
-- `label`
-- optional `icon`
-- `schema`
-- `initialContent`
-- `RendererComponent`
-- `EditorComponent`
-
-## Relationship to the App Block Registry
-
-The app already has an internal registry in
-`apps/nextblock/lib/blocks/blockRegistry.ts`.
-
-That registry is richer than the SDK because it also includes:
-
-- filename-based editor loading
-- filename-based renderer loading
-- CMS-specific helper metadata
-- in-repo block defaults for built-in block types
-
-The important distinction is:
-
-- `libs/sdk` defines the reusable contract
-- `apps/nextblock/lib/blocks/blockRegistry.ts` defines the current built-in
-  implementation
-
-They are related, but they are not the same file or the same level of
-abstraction.
-
-## Current Built-In Extensibility Pattern
-
-Today, adding a built-in block to the app usually means updating:
-
-- the app block registry
-- a CMS editor component
-- a front-end renderer component
-- any supporting schemas or helpers
-
-The existing registry already exposes enough information to support:
-
-- runtime validation
-- default content generation
-- block label lookup
-- block picker rendering
-
-## Commerce-Aware Extensibility
-
-The built-in block registry already contains ecommerce-aware blocks:
-
-- `product_grid`
-- `featured_product`
-- `cart`
-- `checkout`
-- `product_details`
-
-That means the current extensibility surface is not limited to editorial
-content. It already supports block types that render premium commerce
-components.
-
-## Data-Driven Custom Blocks
-
-There is now a third extensibility path that needs no code deploy at all.
-Editors can define block types at runtime from the CMS; each definition is a
-`custom_block_definitions` row (typed fields plus a recursive layout schema)
-rendered on the public site by a dynamic layout engine rather than a compiled
-React component.
-
-So the extensibility surface has three layers:
-
-- **Code-defined built-ins** — the app block registry plus React
-  editor/renderer files. Most flexible, requires a deploy.
-- **The typed SDK contract** (`libs/sdk`) — a small, typed authoring interface
-  for reusable or external blocks.
-- **Data-defined custom blocks** (`custom_block_definitions`) — full CRUD from
-  the CMS, no deploy, rendered from stored JSONB.
-
-Custom blocks are documented in detail in
-[10-CUSTOM-BLOCKS.md](./10-CUSTOM-BLOCKS.md).
-
-## Practical Guidance
-
-- If you are building or refactoring built-in CMS blocks, start with the app
-  registry and editor/renderer files.
-- If you are shaping an external or reusable authoring contract, start with
-  `libs/sdk`.
-- If you need both, keep the SDK contract small and typed, and let the app
-  registry stay responsible for CMS-specific loading behavior.
-- If you want editors to create block types without a deploy, reach for
-  data-driven custom blocks (`custom_block_definitions`) instead of either of
-  the above.
+# 07 Block SDK and Extensibility
+
+## What the SDK Is
+
+`libs/sdk` is the typed contract for block-style extensibility. It is much
+smaller than the in-app block registry because it defines an external authoring
+interface, not the full CMS implementation.
+
+The main export is:
+
+- `@nextblock-cms/sdk`
+
+## Current SDK Surface
+
+`libs/sdk/src/lib/sdk.ts` currently exports the following core types:
+
+- `BlockContentSchema`
+- `BlockData<TSchema>`
+- `BlockProps<TSchema>`
+- `BlockEditorProps<TSchema>`
+- `BlockConfig<TSchema>`
+- `LucideIcon`
+
+## Contract Shape
+
+### Schema
+
+Every block is defined around a Zod object schema:
+
+```ts
+type BlockContentSchema = z.ZodObject<any>;
+```
+
+The runtime content type is inferred from that schema through `BlockData`.
+
+### Renderer contract
+
+The public rendering contract is:
+
+- `content`
+- optional `className`
+- `isInEditor`
+- `languageKey`
+
+### Editor contract
+
+The editing contract is:
+
+- `content`
+- `block`
+- `onChange`
+
+### Registration contract
+
+A block registration object currently requires:
+
+- `type`
+- `label`
+- optional `icon`
+- `schema`
+- `initialContent`
+- `RendererComponent`
+- `EditorComponent`
+
+## Relationship to the App Block Registry
+
+The app already has an internal registry in
+`apps/nextblock/lib/blocks/blockRegistry.ts`.
+
+That registry is richer than the SDK because it also includes:
+
+- filename-based editor loading
+- filename-based renderer loading
+- CMS-specific helper metadata
+- in-repo block defaults for built-in block types
+
+The important distinction is:
+
+- `libs/sdk` defines the reusable contract
+- `apps/nextblock/lib/blocks/blockRegistry.ts` defines the current built-in
+  implementation
+
+They are related, but they are not the same file or the same level of
+abstraction.
+
+## Current Built-In Extensibility Pattern
+
+Today, adding a built-in block to the app usually means updating:
+
+- the app block registry
+- a CMS editor component
+- a front-end renderer component
+- any supporting schemas or helpers
+
+The existing registry already exposes enough information to support:
+
+- runtime validation
+- default content generation
+- block label lookup
+- block picker rendering
+
+## Commerce-Aware Extensibility
+
+The built-in block registry already contains ecommerce-aware blocks:
+
+- `product_grid`
+- `featured_product`
+- `cart`
+- `checkout`
+- `product_details`
+
+That means the current extensibility surface is not limited to editorial
+content. It already supports block types that render premium commerce
+components.
+
+## Data-Driven Custom Blocks
+
+There is now a third extensibility path that needs no code deploy at all.
+Editors can define block types at runtime from the CMS; each definition is a
+`custom_block_definitions` row (typed fields plus a recursive layout schema)
+rendered on the public site by a dynamic layout engine rather than a compiled
+React component.
+
+So the extensibility surface has three layers:
+
+- **Code-defined built-ins** — the app block registry plus React
+  editor/renderer files. Most flexible, requires a deploy.
+- **The typed SDK contract** (`libs/sdk`) — a small, typed authoring interface
+  for reusable or external blocks.
+- **Data-defined custom blocks** (`custom_block_definitions`) — full CRUD from
+  the CMS, no deploy, rendered from stored JSONB.
+
+Custom blocks are documented in detail in
+[10-CUSTOM-BLOCKS.md](./10-CUSTOM-BLOCKS.md).
+
+## Practical Guidance
+
+- If you are building or refactoring built-in CMS blocks, start with the app
+  registry and editor/renderer files.
+- If you are shaping an external or reusable authoring contract, start with
+  `libs/sdk`.
+- If you need both, keep the SDK contract small and typed, and let the app
+  registry stay responsible for CMS-specific loading behavior.
+- If you want editors to create block types without a deploy, reach for
+  data-driven custom blocks (`custom_block_definitions`) instead of either of
+  the above.