create-githolon 0.108.7 → 0.110.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "create-githolon",
3
- "version": "0.108.7",
3
+ "version": "0.110.0",
4
4
  "type": "module",
5
5
  "description": "Scaffold a Nomos domain package: the starter domain + compile config + live e2e. `npm create githolon my-app`.",
6
6
  "license": "SEE LICENSE IN LICENSE.md",
@@ -18,14 +18,16 @@ Model the business language. Do not recreate Nomos as application infrastructure
18
18
  npm run compile
19
19
  npm run proof
20
20
  # After the first deployed model, prove the candidate over copied real custody too:
21
- npx githolon proof --upgrade
21
+ npx githolon test
22
22
  ```
23
23
 
24
24
  `compile` is the evolution gate. `proof` exercises the emitted candidate in the real local kernel, including
25
25
  cold custody restore. `proof --upgrade` resolves the workspace already bound in `nomos.project.ts`, copies
26
- its custody into a disposable local kernel, replays the candidate over the exact history, promotes it only
27
- in that copy, and cold-opens the result. If history changes meaning, it stops for an explicit
28
- `--acceptance-reason`; never invent one. Never make deployment the first place a candidate law is executed.
26
+ its custody into a disposable local kernel, verifies the existing chain under its recorded eras, derives
27
+ the candidate's current-frontier transition, promotes it only in that copy, and cold-opens the result.
28
+ Stable-id retirements, retypes, or rebinds stop for an explicit `--acceptance-reason`; never invent one.
29
+ Whole-history simulation is an explicitly requested counterfactual and is never an adoption gate. Never
30
+ make deployment the first place a candidate law is executed.
29
31
 
30
32
  If either command exposes framework implementation machinery, treat that as a Nomos defect rather than
31
33
  teaching the application to handle it.
@@ -87,13 +87,14 @@ updated identity file beside the domain source, run `proof`, and deploy only tho
87
87
  Before upgrading an existing application, run the history-shaped proof as well:
88
88
 
89
89
  ```bash
90
- npx githolon proof --upgrade
90
+ npx githolon test
91
91
  ```
92
92
 
93
93
  It uses the workspace binding in `nomos.project.ts` (or accepts a workspace/local-ledger argument), copies
94
- that custody into the local kernel, exercises the candidate against its exact history, promotes only in the
95
- copy, and proves a cold restart. The source is never modified. If the candidate deliberately changes an old
96
- business outcome, the command names the differences and requires an accountable `--acceptance-reason`.
94
+ that custody into the local kernel, verifies the chain under its recorded eras, derives the candidate's
95
+ current-frontier transition, promotes only in the copy, and proves a cold restart. The source is never
96
+ modified. Stable-id retirements, retypes, or rebinds require an accountable `--acceptance-reason`.
97
+ Whole-history simulation is available only as an explicit counterfactual and never gates adoption.
97
98
 
98
99
  Useful files:
99
100
 
@@ -102,7 +103,7 @@ Useful files:
102
103
  - [`nomos.project.ts`](nomos.project.ts): typed business-law authoring input; it emits the readable USDA law closure and its `.law.usdz` package;
103
104
  - [`nomos.application.ts`](nomos.application.ts): application-composition authoring input; only the emitted `.application.usda` travels;
104
105
  - `build/application/__APP_DART_NAME___application/`: the sole Flutter application dependency;
105
- - `build/__APP_NAME__.proof.mts`: the generated local proof.
106
+ - `build/__APP_NAME__.reception.mjs`: the application's TypeScript Reception (drive it from vitest with `@githolon/testing`).
106
107
 
107
108
  If application code needs to understand workspaces, event sourcing, JWTs, signatures, retries, topology,
108
109
  serialization, or merge algorithms, a framework concern has leaked out of Nomos.
@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@
6
6
  "description": "A Nomos business application: public intents over private atomic consequences.",
7
7
  "scripts": {
8
8
  "compile": "githolon compile ./nomos.project.ts && githolon compile ./nomos.application.ts",
9
- "proof": "githolon proof",
10
9
  "typecheck": "tsc --noEmit"
11
10
  },
12
11
  "dependencies": {
@@ -11,8 +11,7 @@
11
11
  },
12
12
  "include": [
13
13
  "domains/**/*.ts",
14
- "build/*.client.d.mts",
15
- "build/*.proof.mts",
14
+ "build/*.reception.d.mts",
16
15
  "test/**/*.mts"
17
16
  ]
18
17
  }