create-docusaurus 0.0.0-4375 → 0.0.0-4379

package/templates/facebook/node_modules/stylelint/lib/rules/named-grid-areas-no-invalid/README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+# named-grid-areas-no-invalid
+
+Disallow invalid named grid areas.
+
+<!-- prettier-ignore -->
+```css
+a { grid-template-areas:
+      "a a a"
+      "b b b"; }
+/**   ↑
+ *  This named grid area */
+```
+
+For a named grid area to be valid, all strings must define:
+
+- the same number of cell tokens
+- at least one cell token
+
+And all named grid areas that spans multiple grid cells must form a single filled-in rectangle.
+
+## Options
+
+### `true`
+
+The following patterns are considered violations:
+
+<!-- prettier-ignore -->
+```css
+a { grid-template-areas: "" }
+```
+
+<!-- prettier-ignore -->
+```css
+a { grid-template-areas: "a a a"
+                         "b b b b"; }
+```
+
+<!-- prettier-ignore -->
+```css
+a { grid-template-areas: "a a a"
+                         "b b a"; }
+```
+
+The following pattern is _not_ considered a violation:
+
+<!-- prettier-ignore -->
+```css
+a { grid-template-areas: "a a a"
+                         "b b b"; }
+```

package/templates/facebook/node_modules/stylelint/lib/rules/named-grid-areas-no-invalid/index.js

@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+// @ts-nocheck
+
+'use strict';
+
+const _ = require('lodash');
+const declarationValueIndex = require('../../utils/declarationValueIndex');
+const findNotContiguousOrRectangular = require('./utils/findNotContiguousOrRectangular');
+const isRectangular = require('./utils/isRectangular');
+const report = require('../../utils/report');
+const ruleMessages = require('../../utils/ruleMessages');
+const validateOptions = require('../../utils/validateOptions');
+const valueParser = require('postcss-value-parser');
+
+const ruleName = 'named-grid-areas-no-invalid';
+
+const messages = ruleMessages(ruleName, {
+	expectedToken: () => 'Expected cell token within string',
+	expectedSameNumber: () => 'Expected same number of cell tokens in each string',
+	expectedRectangle: (name) => `Expected single filled-in rectangle for "${name}"`,
+});
+
+function rule(actual) {
+	return (root, result) => {
+		const validOptions = validateOptions(result, ruleName, { actual });
+
+		if (!validOptions) {
+			return;
+		}
+
+		root.walkDecls(/^grid-template-areas$/i, (decl) => {
+			const { value } = decl;
+
+			if (value.toLowerCase().trim() === 'none') return;
+
+			const areas = [];
+			let reportSent = false;
+
+			valueParser(value).walk(({ sourceIndex, type, value: tokenValue }) => {
+				if (type !== 'string') return;
+
+				if (tokenValue === '') {
+					complain(messages.expectedToken(), sourceIndex);
+					reportSent = true;
+
+					return;
+				}
+
+				areas.push(_.compact(tokenValue.trim().split(' ')));
+			});
+
+			if (reportSent) return;
+
+			if (!isRectangular(areas)) {
+				complain(messages.expectedSameNumber());
+
+				return;
+			}
+
+			const notContiguousOrRectangular = findNotContiguousOrRectangular(areas);
+
+			notContiguousOrRectangular.sort().forEach((name) => {
+				complain(messages.expectedRectangle(name));
+			});
+
+			function complain(message, sourceIndex = 0) {
+				report({
+					message,
+					node: decl,
+					index: declarationValueIndex(decl) + sourceIndex,
+					result,
+					ruleName,
+				});
+			}
+		});
+	};
+}
+
+rule.ruleName = ruleName;
+rule.messages = messages;
+module.exports = rule;

package/templates/facebook/node_modules/stylelint/lib/rules/named-grid-areas-no-invalid/utils/findNotContiguousOrRectangular.js

@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+'use strict';
+
+const _ = require('lodash');
+
+/**
+ *
+ * @param {string[][]} areas
+ * @param {string} name
+ * @returns {boolean}
+ */
+function isContiguousAndRectangular(areas, name) {
+	const indicesByRow = areas.map((row) => {
+		const indices = [];
+		let idx = row.indexOf(name);
+
+		while (idx !== -1) {
+			indices.push(idx);
+			idx = row.indexOf(name, idx + 1);
+		}
+
+		return indices;
+	});
+
+	for (let i = 0; i < indicesByRow.length; i++) {
+		for (let j = i + 1; j < indicesByRow.length; j++) {
+			if (indicesByRow[i].length === 0 || indicesByRow[j].length === 0) {
+				continue;
+			}
+
+			if (!_.isEqual(indicesByRow[i], indicesByRow[j])) {
+				return false;
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
+	return true;
+}
+
+/**
+ *
+ * @param {string[][]} areas
+ * @returns {string[]}
+ */
+function namedAreas(areas) {
+	const names = new Set(_.flatten(areas));
+
+	names.delete('.');
+
+	return Array.from(names);
+}
+
+/**
+ *
+ * @param {string[][]} areas
+ * @returns {string[]}
+ */
+function findNotContiguousOrRectangular(areas) {
+	return namedAreas(areas).filter((name) => !isContiguousAndRectangular(areas, name));
+}
+
+module.exports = findNotContiguousOrRectangular;

package/templates/facebook/node_modules/stylelint/lib/rules/named-grid-areas-no-invalid/utils/isRectangular.js

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+'use strict';
+
+/**
+ *
+ * @param {string[][]} areas
+ * @returns {boolean}
+ */
+function isRectangular(areas) {
+	return areas.every((row, i, arr) => row.length === arr[0].length);
+}
+
+module.exports = isRectangular;

package/templates/facebook/node_modules/stylelint/lib/rules/no-descending-specificity/README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,166 @@
+# no-descending-specificity
+
+Disallow selectors of lower specificity from coming after overriding selectors of higher specificity.
+
+<!-- prettier-ignore -->
+```css
+    #container a { top: 10px; } a { top: 0; }
+/** ↑                           ↑
+ * The order of these selectors represents descending specificity */
+```
+
+Source order is important in CSS, and when two selectors have the _same_ specificity, the one that occurs _last_ will take priority. However, the situation is different when one of the selectors has a _higher_ specificity. In that case, source order does _not_ matter: the selector with higher specificity will win out even if it comes first.
+
+The clashes of these two mechanisms for prioritization, source order and specificity, can cause some confusion when reading stylesheets. If a selector with higher specificity comes _before_ the selector it overrides, we have to think harder to understand it, because it violates the source order expectation. **Stylesheets are most legible when overriding selectors always come _after_ the selectors they override.** That way both mechanisms, source order and specificity, work together nicely.
+
+This rule enforces that practice _as best it can_, reporting fewer errors than it should. It cannot catch every _actual_ overriding selector, but it can catch certain common mistakes.
+
+## How it works
+
+**This rule looks at the last _compound selector_ in every full selector, and then compares it with other selectors in the stylesheet that end in the same way.**
+
+So `.foo .bar` (whose last compound selector is `.bar`) will be compared to `.bar` and `#baz .bar`, but not to `#baz .foo` or `.bar .foo`.
+
+And `a > li#wag.pit` (whose last compound selector is `li#wag.pit`) will be compared to `div li#wag.pit` and `a > b > li + li#wag.pit`, but not to `li` or `li #wag`, etc.
+
+Selectors targeting pseudo-elements are not considered comparable to similar selectors without the pseudo-element, because they target other elements on the rendered page. For example, `a::before {}` will not be compared to `a:hover {}`, because `a::before` targets a pseudo-element whereas `a:hover` targets the actual `<a>`.
+
+This rule only compares rules that are within the same media context. So `a {} @media print { #baz a {} }` is fine.
+
+This rule resolves nested selectors before calculating the specificity of the selectors.
+
+## DOM Limitations
+
+The linter can only check the CSS to check for specificity order. It does not have access to the HTML or DOM in order to interpret the use of the CSS.
+
+This can lead to valid linting errors appearing to be invalid at first glance.
+
+For example the following will cause an error:
+
+<!-- prettier-ignore -->
+```css
+.component1 a {}
+.component1 a:hover {}
+.component2 a {}
+```
+
+This is a correct error because the `a:hover` on line 2 has a higher specificity than the `a` on line 3.
+
+This may lead to confusion because "the two selectors will never match the same `a` in the DOM". However, since the linter does not have access to the DOM it can not evaluate this, and therefore correctly reports the error about descending specificity.
+
+It may be possible to restructure your CSS to remove the error, otherwise it is recommended that you disable the rule for that line and leave a comment saying why the error should be ignored. Note that disabling the rule will cause additional valid errors from being reported.
+
+## Options
+
+### `true`
+
+The following patterns are considered violations:
+
+<!-- prettier-ignore -->
+```css
+b a {}
+a {}
+```
+
+<!-- prettier-ignore -->
+```css
+a + a {}
+a {}
+```
+
+<!-- prettier-ignore -->
+```css
+b > a[foo] {}
+a[foo] {}
+```
+
+<!-- prettier-ignore -->
+```css
+a {
+  & > b {}
+}
+b {}
+```
+
+<!-- prettier-ignore -->
+```css
+@media print {
+  #c a {}
+  a {}
+}
+```
+
+The following patterns are _not_ considered violations:
+
+<!-- prettier-ignore -->
+```css
+a {}
+b a {}
+```
+
+<!-- prettier-ignore -->
+```css
+a {}
+a + a {}
+```
+
+<!-- prettier-ignore -->
+```css
+a[foo] {}
+b > a[foo] {}
+```
+
+<!-- prettier-ignore -->
+```css
+b {}
+a {
+  & > b {}
+}
+```
+
+<!-- prettier-ignore -->
+```css
+a::before {}
+a:hover::before {}
+a {}
+a:hover {}
+```
+
+<!-- prettier-ignore -->
+```css
+@media print {
+  a {}
+  #c a {}
+}
+```
+
+<!-- prettier-ignore -->
+```css
+a {}
+@media print {
+  #baz a {}
+}
+```
+
+### `ignore: ["selectors-within-list"]`
+
+Ignores selectors within list of selectors.
+
+The following patterns are considered violations:
+
+<!-- prettier-ignore -->
+```css
+b a {}
+h1 {}
+h2 {}
+h3 {}
+a {}
+```
+
+The following patterns are _not_ considered violations:
+
+<!-- prettier-ignore -->
+```css
+b a {}
+h1, h2, h3, a {}
+```

package/templates/facebook/node_modules/stylelint/lib/rules/no-descending-specificity/index.js

@@ -0,0 +1,146 @@
+// @ts-nocheck
+
+'use strict';
+
+const _ = require('lodash');
+const findAtRuleContext = require('../../utils/findAtRuleContext');
+const isCustomPropertySet = require('../../utils/isCustomPropertySet');
+const isStandardSyntaxRule = require('../../utils/isStandardSyntaxRule');
+const isStandardSyntaxSelector = require('../../utils/isStandardSyntaxSelector');
+const keywordSets = require('../../reference/keywordSets');
+const nodeContextLookup = require('../../utils/nodeContextLookup');
+const optionsMatches = require('../../utils/optionsMatches');
+const parseSelector = require('../../utils/parseSelector');
+const report = require('../../utils/report');
+const resolvedNestedSelector = require('postcss-resolve-nested-selector');
+const ruleMessages = require('../../utils/ruleMessages');
+const specificity = require('specificity');
+const validateOptions = require('../../utils/validateOptions');
+
+const ruleName = 'no-descending-specificity';
+
+const messages = ruleMessages(ruleName, {
+	rejected: (b, a) => `Expected selector "${b}" to come before selector "${a}"`,
+});
+
+function rule(on, options) {
+	return (root, result) => {
+		const validOptions = validateOptions(
+			result,
+			ruleName,
+			{
+				actual: on,
+			},
+			{
+				optional: true,
+				actual: options,
+				possible: {
+					ignore: ['selectors-within-list'],
+				},
+			},
+		);
+
+		if (!validOptions) {
+			return;
+		}
+
+		const selectorContextLookup = nodeContextLookup();
+
+		root.walkRules((ruleNode) => {
+			// Ignore custom property set `--foo: {};`
+			if (isCustomPropertySet(ruleNode)) {
+				return;
+			}
+
+			// Ignore nested property `foo: {};`
+			if (!isStandardSyntaxRule(ruleNode)) {
+				return;
+			}
+
+			// Ignores selectors within list of selectors
+			if (
+				optionsMatches(options, 'ignore', 'selectors-within-list') &&
+				ruleNode.selectors.length > 1
+			) {
+				return;
+			}
+
+			const comparisonContext = selectorContextLookup.getContext(
+				ruleNode,
+				findAtRuleContext(ruleNode),
+			);
+
+			ruleNode.selectors.forEach((selector) => {
+				const trimSelector = selector.trim();
+
+				// Ignore `.selector, { }`
+				if (trimSelector === '') {
+					return;
+				}
+
+				// The edge-case of duplicate selectors will act acceptably
+				const index = ruleNode.selector.indexOf(trimSelector);
+
+				// Resolve any nested selectors before checking
+				resolvedNestedSelector(selector, ruleNode).forEach((resolvedSelector) => {
+					parseSelector(resolvedSelector, result, ruleNode, (s) => {
+						if (!isStandardSyntaxSelector(resolvedSelector)) {
+							return;
+						}
+
+						checkSelector(s, ruleNode, index, comparisonContext);
+					});
+				});
+			});
+		});
+
+		function checkSelector(selectorNode, ruleNode, sourceIndex, comparisonContext) {
+			const selector = selectorNode.toString();
+			const referenceSelectorNode = lastCompoundSelectorWithoutPseudoClasses(selectorNode);
+			const selectorSpecificity = specificity.calculate(selector)[0].specificityArray;
+			const entry = { selector, specificity: selectorSpecificity };
+
+			if (!comparisonContext.has(referenceSelectorNode)) {
+				comparisonContext.set(referenceSelectorNode, [entry]);
+
+				return;
+			}
+
+			const priorComparableSelectors = comparisonContext.get(referenceSelectorNode);
+
+			priorComparableSelectors.forEach((priorEntry) => {
+				if (specificity.compare(selectorSpecificity, priorEntry.specificity) === -1) {
+					report({
+						ruleName,
+						result,
+						node: ruleNode,
+						message: messages.rejected(selector, priorEntry.selector),
+						index: sourceIndex,
+					});
+				}
+			});
+
+			priorComparableSelectors.push(entry);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+function lastCompoundSelectorWithoutPseudoClasses(selectorNode) {
+	const nodesAfterLastCombinator = _.last(
+		selectorNode.nodes[0].split((node) => {
+			return node.type === 'combinator';
+		}),
+	);
+
+	const nodesWithoutPseudoClasses = nodesAfterLastCombinator
+		.filter((node) => {
+			return node.type !== 'pseudo' || keywordSets.pseudoElements.has(node.value.replace(/:/g, ''));
+		})
+		.join('');
+
+	return nodesWithoutPseudoClasses.toString();
+}
+
+rule.ruleName = ruleName;
+rule.messages = messages;
+module.exports = rule;

package/templates/facebook/node_modules/stylelint/lib/rules/no-duplicate-at-import-rules/README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+# no-duplicate-at-import-rules
+
+Disallow duplicate `@import` rules within a stylesheet.
+
+<!-- prettier-ignore -->
+```css
+    @import "a.css";
+    @import "a.css";
+/** ↑
+ * These are duplicates */
+```
+
+## Options
+
+### `true`
+
+The following patterns are considered violations:
+
+<!-- prettier-ignore -->
+```css
+@import 'a.css';
+@import 'a.css';
+```
+
+<!-- prettier-ignore -->
+```css
+@import url("a.css");
+@import url("a.css");
+```
+
+<!-- prettier-ignore -->
+```css
+@import "a.css";
+@import 'a.css';
+```
+
+<!-- prettier-ignore -->
+```css
+@import "a.css";
+@import 'b.css';
+@import url(a.css);
+```
+
+The following patterns are _not_ considered violations:
+
+<!-- prettier-ignore -->
+```css
+@import "a.css";
+@import "b.css";
+```
+
+<!-- prettier-ignore -->
+```css
+@import url('a.css') projection;
+@import url('a.css') tv;
+```

package/templates/facebook/node_modules/stylelint/lib/rules/no-duplicate-at-import-rules/index.js

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+// @ts-nocheck
+
+'use strict';
+
+const mediaParser = require('postcss-media-query-parser').default;
+const report = require('../../utils/report');
+const ruleMessages = require('../../utils/ruleMessages');
+const validateOptions = require('../../utils/validateOptions');
+const valueParser = require('postcss-value-parser');
+
+const ruleName = 'no-duplicate-at-import-rules';
+
+const messages = ruleMessages(ruleName, {
+	rejected: (atImport) => `Unexpected duplicate @import rule ${atImport}`,
+});
+
+function rule(actual) {
+	return (root, result) => {
+		const validOptions = validateOptions(result, ruleName, { actual });
+
+		if (!validOptions) {
+			return;
+		}
+
+		const imports = {};
+
+		root.walkAtRules(/^import$/i, (atRule) => {
+			const params = valueParser(atRule.params).nodes;
+
+			if (!params.length) {
+				return;
+			}
+
+			// extract uri from url() if exists
+			const uri =
+				params[0].type === 'function' && params[0].value === 'url'
+					? params[0].nodes[0].value
+					: params[0].value;
+			// extract media queries if any
+			const media = mediaParser(valueParser.stringify(params.slice(1)))
+				.nodes.map((n) => n.value.replace(/\s/g, ''))
+				.filter((n) => n.length);
+
+			const isDuplicate = media.length
+				? imports[uri] && media.some((q) => imports[uri].includes(q))
+				: imports[uri];
+
+			if (isDuplicate) {
+				report({
+					message: messages.rejected(uri),
+					node: atRule,
+					result,
+					ruleName,
+				});
+
+				return;
+			}
+
+			if (!imports[uri]) imports[uri] = [];
+
+			imports[uri] = imports[uri].concat(media);
+		});
+	};
+}
+
+rule.ruleName = ruleName;
+rule.messages = messages;
+module.exports = rule;