create-claude-cabinet 0.29.1 → 0.29.3

package/lib/cli.js

@@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ const MODULES = {
     mandatory: false,
     default: true,
     lean: false,
-    templates: ['scripts/pib-db.mjs', 'scripts/pib-db-lib.mjs', 'scripts/pib-db-mcp-server.mjs', 'scripts/pib-db-schema.sql', 'scripts/work-tracker-server.mjs', 'scripts/work-tracker-ui.html', 'skills/work-tracker'],
+    templates: ['scripts/pib-db.mjs', 'scripts/pib-db-lib.mjs', 'scripts/pib-db-mcp-server.mjs', 'scripts/pib-db-schema.sql', 'scripts/work-tracker-server.mjs', 'scripts/work-tracker-ui.html', 'skills/work-tracker', 'skills/spring-clean'],
     needsDb: true,
   },
   'planning': {

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "create-claude-cabinet",
-  "version": "0.29.1",
+  "version": "0.29.3",
   "description": "Claude Cabinet — opinionated process scaffolding for Claude Code projects",
   "bin": {
     "create-claude-cabinet": "bin/create-claude-cabinet.js"

package/templates/site-audit-runtime/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@claude-cabinet/site-audit",
-  "version": "0.1.1",
+  "version": "0.1.2",
   "description": "Comprehensive deployed-site quality audit engine for Claude Cabinet. Runs checks across performance, accessibility, security, SEO, content, DNS, and privacy against a deployed URL; single-site and comparison modes; standalone HTML report.",
   "type": "module",
   "bin": {

package/templates/skills/orient/SKILL.md

@@ -249,6 +249,16 @@ CLI.
    - "N projects may be ready to close (0 open actions)"
    - "N projects have had no activity in 14+ days"
 
+4. **Spring-clean heuristic** — suggest `/spring-clean` when the backlog
+   shows structural cruft. Fire when ANY of:
+   - An active project has 10+ open actions AND no completion in 14+ days
+   - Total active projects > 7
+   Cap at once per 7 days — check if a spring-clean note exists in the
+   last 7 days of session context before surfacing. When it fires,
+   append to Attention Items:
+   *"Backlog may benefit from `/spring-clean` (N stale, M open actions
+   in mega-projects)."*
+
 If pib-db doesn't exist, skip with no warning — the project may use
 a different work tracking system configured in `phases/work-scan.md`.
 

package/templates/skills/spring-clean/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,260 @@
+---
+name: spring-clean
+description: |
+  Work-tracker backlog hygiene. Diagnoses cruft (stale projects, duplicates,
+  orphaned actions, mega-projects, naming issues), runs organized-mind
+  assessment for cognitive load, then walks you through interactive triage
+  with immediate pib-db mutations. Use when: backlog feels unwieldy,
+  "spring clean", "/spring-clean", or orient heuristic suggests it.
+related:
+  - type: file
+    path: .claude/skills/spring-clean/phases/analysis-scope.md
+    role: "Project-specific heuristics for what to analyze and what to skip"
+  - type: file
+    path: .claude/skills/spring-clean/phases/verification-rules.md
+    role: "How to verify items against codebase state"
+  - type: file
+    path: .claude/skills/spring-clean/phases/triage-presentation.md
+    role: "How to present recommendations (inline default, UI optional)"
+  - type: file
+    path: .claude/skills/spring-clean/phases/execute-decisions.md
+    role: "How to apply approved mutations to pib-db"
+  - type: file
+    path: cabinet/_briefing.md
+    role: "Project identity and configuration"
+argument-hint: "focus — e.g., 'stale', 'reorg', 'all'"
+user-invocable: true
+---
+
+# /spring-clean — Work-Tracker Backlog Hygiene
+
+## Arguments
+
+If `$ARGUMENTS` is provided:
+- **Empty** or **'all'**: Full analysis — stale, duplicates, orphans,
+  mega-projects, naming, cognitive load.
+- **'stale'**: Focus on stale projects and completion candidates only.
+- **'reorg'**: Focus on structural issues — mega-projects, reparenting,
+  missing functional groups, cognitive load.
+
+## Purpose
+
+Work-tracking backlogs accumulate cruft that orient detects symptomatically
+("N projects stale") but can't resolve. Resolving it today requires an
+improvised 30-minute session. This skill encodes the pattern: autonomous
+diagnosis, then interactive cure.
+
+**Boundary:** orient surfaces signals. Pulse checks descriptions.
+Spring-clean resolves structural problems in the work tracker itself.
+
+| Skill | Question it asks |
+|-------|-----------------|
+| Orient | What needs attention today? |
+| Pulse | Do the descriptions match reality? |
+| Spring-clean | Is the backlog itself well-structured? |
+
+This is a **skeleton skill** using the `phases/` directory pattern.
+
+### Phase File Protocol
+
+Phase files have three states:
+
+| State | Meaning |
+|-------|---------|
+| Absent or empty | Use this skeleton's **default behavior** for the phase |
+| Contains only `skip: true` | **Explicitly opted out** — skip this phase entirely |
+| Contains content | **Custom behavior** — use the file's content instead |
+
+## Preflight
+
+Verify `pib.db` exists (check for `scripts/pib-db.mjs` or pib_* MCP
+tools). If not: "No work tracker found — /spring-clean requires pib-db."
+
+## Workflow
+
+### 1. Inventory & Analysis (autonomous)
+
+Spawn a single agent to pull the full pib-db picture and analyze it.
+The agent uses pib_query (MCP) or `node scripts/pib-db.mjs query` to
+run the following queries:
+
+**Active projects with open/completed counts and last activity:**
+```sql
+SELECT p.fid, p.name, p.status, p.created,
+  (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM actions a WHERE a.project_fid = p.fid AND a.completed = 0 AND a.deleted_at IS NULL) as open_count,
+  (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM actions a WHERE a.project_fid = p.fid AND a.completed = 1) as done_count,
+  (SELECT MAX(a.completed_at) FROM actions a WHERE a.project_fid = p.fid AND a.completed = 1) as last_completion,
+  (SELECT MAX(a.created) FROM actions a WHERE a.project_fid = p.fid AND a.deleted_at IS NULL) as last_action_created
+FROM projects p
+WHERE p.deleted_at IS NULL
+ORDER BY p.status, open_count DESC
+```
+
+**All open actions with project context:**
+```sql
+SELECT a.fid, a.text, a.status, a.created, a.project_fid, a.trigger_condition,
+  p.name as project_name, p.status as project_status
+FROM actions a
+LEFT JOIN projects p ON a.project_fid = p.fid
+WHERE a.completed = 0 AND a.deleted_at IS NULL
+ORDER BY p.name, a.sort_order
+```
+
+From this data, the agent produces structured analysis:
+
+```json
+{
+  "stale": [{"fid": "...", "name": "...", "daysSinceActivity": 0, "openCount": 0}],
+  "duplicates": [{"fid1": "...", "fid2": "...", "matchReason": "..."}],
+  "orphans": [{"fid": "...", "text": "...", "parentStatus": "..."}],
+  "completionCandidates": [{"fid": "...", "name": "..."}],
+  "megaProjects": [{"fid": "...", "name": "...", "openCount": 0}],
+  "dataInconsistencies": [{"fid": "...", "issue": "..."}],
+  "namingIssues": [{"fid": "...", "currentName": "...", "concern": "..."}],
+  "statusDistribution": {"active": 0, "someday": 0, "dropped": 0},
+  "totalOpen": 0,
+  "totalProjects": 0
+}
+```
+
+Heuristics:
+- **Stale:** active project with no completion in 14+ days and open actions
+- **Completion candidate:** active project with 0 open actions
+- **Orphan:** action whose project is dropped/completed/deleted
+- **Mega-project:** 10+ open actions
+- **Duplicate:** two actions in the same project with >70% text overlap
+  (Levenshtein or shared significant words)
+- **Data inconsistency:** project marked active but all actions completed;
+  action marked open but project is dropped
+- **Naming issue:** project name references a version that's now shipped,
+  or name is ambiguous/too generic
+
+Read `phases/analysis-scope.md` for project-specific heuristic overrides.
+
+Read `phases/verification-rules.md` for how to verify items against
+codebase state (e.g., check if a planned feature was actually built).
+
+### 2. Organized-Mind Assessment (autonomous, sequential after step 1)
+
+Spawn the organized-mind cabinet member with the structured output from
+step 1. The organized-mind agent evaluates:
+
+- **Cognitive load:** How many active projects vs the ~4-item working
+  memory limit? Is the operator context-switching between too many
+  concurrent efforts?
+- **Mixed-mode projects:** Any project that mixes "build this now"
+  actions with "research this someday" items? Candidates for split.
+- **Functional grouping:** Are related actions scattered across
+  projects that should be consolidated? Are there implicit categories
+  that deserve their own project?
+- **Categorization quality:** Do project names map to cognitive modes
+  (what brain you're in), or are they organized by type/urgency?
+
+Returns structured recommendations alongside the inventory analysis.
+
+### 3. Synthesis
+
+Merge inventory analysis + organized-mind assessment into categorized
+recommendations. Seven categories (locked — no ad-hoc categories):
+
+| Category | Meaning | Typical action |
+|----------|---------|---------------|
+| **close** | Verified done or data inconsistency | `pib_complete_action` or update project status |
+| **archive** | Not done but abandoned/superseded | Move to `someday` or `dropped` |
+| **merge** | Two items covering same ground | Delete one, update the other's notes |
+| **split** | Mega-project mixing cognitive modes | Create new project, reparent actions |
+| **reparent** | Action belongs in a different project | Update action's `project_fid` |
+| **create-project** | Missing functional group identified | `pib_create_project`, then reparent |
+| **flag** | Worth attention but no immediate action | Surface in briefing, no mutation |
+
+**Rename** is a sub-recommendation on other categories (e.g., "close
+project X — also rename to reflect shipped version"), not a standalone
+category.
+
+Each recommendation includes: fid(s), category, rationale, proposed
+mutation (the exact MCP call or CLI command).
+
+### 4. Interactive Triage
+
+Present recommendations in **decision-cost ascending** order:
+
+1. **Structural summary** — total counts, high-level picture. No
+   decisions required. Just orientation.
+2. **No-brainers** — closes, archives. Low decision cost, quick wins.
+   Batch by category.
+3. **Structural moves** — merges, splits, reparents, create-project.
+   Higher cost, may need follow-up. Present individually.
+4. **Flags** — advisory. No action unless the user wants to act.
+
+For each recommendation, present:
+- What it is and why
+- The proposed mutation
+- Three options: **approve** (apply now), **defer** (persist for next
+  spring-clean), **reject** (dismiss permanently)
+
+**Defer affordance:** Deferred items are NOT lost. Append a note to
+the action/project: `[spring-clean deferred: <rationale>]`. The next
+spring-clean run surfaces them again with the prior rationale.
+
+Apply approved changes immediately via pib_* MCP tools (or CLI
+fallback). Read `phases/execute-decisions.md` for project-specific
+mutation rules.
+
+Read `phases/triage-presentation.md` for presentation customization
+(inline conversation is the default; review UI is optional).
+
+### 5. Summary
+
+After all recommendations are triaged, report:
+- Changes made (N closed, N archived, N merged, N reparented, ...)
+- Deferred items (N items deferred for next run)
+- Updated landscape (active project count, total open actions)
+
+## Phase Summary
+
+| Phase | Absent = | What it customizes |
+|-------|----------|-------------------|
+| `analysis-scope.md` | Default: standard heuristics | Project-specific thresholds and exclusions |
+| `verification-rules.md` | Default: skip codebase verification | How to verify items against code |
+| `triage-presentation.md` | Default: inline conversation | Presentation format (inline vs review UI) |
+| `execute-decisions.md` | Default: direct pib_* MCP calls | Mutation rules and safeguards |
+
+## Principles
+
+- **Autonomous diagnosis, interactive cure.** The analysis is fully
+  automated. The triage is fully human-driven. No auto-mutations.
+- **Decision-cost ordering.** Easy wins first. The user builds momentum
+  on no-brainer closes before facing structural reorganization.
+- **Defer is not dismiss.** Ambiguous items persist. Spring-clean is
+  re-runnable — deferred items surface again with prior context.
+- **Seven locked categories.** No ad-hoc categories. If something
+  doesn't fit, it's a flag. This prevents category sprawl across runs.
+- **Organized-mind always runs.** Even on a small backlog, the
+  cognitive-load assessment is valuable — it catches structural issues
+  that raw staleness detection misses.
+
+## Calibration
+
+**Core failure this targets:** Backlogs that grow monotonically because
+nothing resolves structural cruft. Orient says "N stale projects" every
+session. The user mentally notes it and moves on. After 3 months, the
+backlog is 40% cruft and the signal-to-noise ratio makes work-scanning
+useless.
+
+### Without Skill (Bad)
+
+Orient reports 3 stale projects and 2 completion candidates. The user
+says "I should clean that up sometime." They don't. Next session, orient
+reports 4 stale and 2 candidates. The backlog grows. After 8 weeks,
+there are 15 active projects, half of which are actually done, abandoned,
+or duplicative. The work tracker is noise.
+
+### With Skill (Good)
+
+Orient fires the heuristic: "Backlog may benefit from /spring-clean (3
+stale, 12+ open actions in 2 projects)." The user runs it. In 10
+minutes: 2 projects closed (verified done), 1 archived (superseded by
+a newer approach), 3 actions reparented to the right project, 1
+mega-project split into two focused tracks. Organized-mind notes that
+active project count dropped from 8 to 5 — within working memory.
+Deferred: 1 ambiguous item that'll surface next run with context.

package/templates/skills/spring-clean/phases/analysis-scope.md

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+# Analysis Scope
+
+Define project-specific heuristics for the inventory & analysis step.
+
+**Default (absent/empty):** Use standard heuristics:
+- Stale: 14+ days since last completion with open actions
+- Mega-project: 10+ open actions
+- Duplicate: >70% text overlap between actions in the same project
+- Completion candidate: active project with 0 open actions
+
+## Customization examples
+
+```markdown
+# Exclude someday projects from staleness detection
+exclude_from_stale: status = 'someday'
+
+# Lower the mega-project threshold for this team
+mega_project_threshold: 7
+
+# These projects are intentionally long-running — don't flag as stale
+always_skip:
+  - prj:abc12345  # ongoing maintenance
+  - prj:def67890  # quarterly review
+```

package/templates/skills/spring-clean/phases/execute-decisions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+# Execute Decisions
+
+Define how to apply approved mutations to pib-db.
+
+**Default (absent/empty):** Direct pib_* MCP calls (or CLI fallback):
+- **close:** `pib_complete_action` or update project status
+- **archive:** `pib_update_action` with status change to someday/dropped
+- **merge:** Update surviving item's notes, delete the duplicate
+- **split:** `pib_create_project`, then `pib_update_action` to reparent
+- **reparent:** `pib_update_action` with new `project_fid`
+- **create-project:** `pib_create_project`
+
+## Safeguards
+
+All mutations are logged to the conversation. No bulk deletes — each
+deletion is individually approved. Project status changes (active →
+dropped) require explicit confirmation even in batch mode.

package/templates/skills/spring-clean/phases/triage-presentation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+# Triage Presentation
+
+Define how to present spring-clean recommendations to the user.
+
+**Default (absent/empty):** Inline conversation. Recommendations are
+presented in decision-cost order directly in the chat. Each batch
+shows the items, proposed mutations, and asks for approve/defer/reject.
+
+## Alternative: Review UI
+
+For large backlogs (20+ recommendations), the review UI may be less
+fatiguing than inline conversation:
+
+```markdown
+presentation: review-ui
+port: 3459
+verdict_labels:
+  approve: "Apply"
+  defer: "Later"
+  reject: "Dismiss"
+```
+
+The skill starts `node scripts/review-server.mjs`, posts recommendations
+as review items, and processes verdicts after the user submits.

package/templates/skills/spring-clean/phases/verification-rules.md

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+# Verification Rules
+
+Define how to verify work-tracker items against the actual codebase.
+
+**Default (absent/empty):** Skip codebase verification. Analysis
+relies on pib-db state only (timestamps, counts, text).
+
+## When to use
+
+Enable codebase verification when you want the analysis agent to
+check whether planned work was actually built. This catches items
+that were implemented but never marked complete.
+
+## Example
+
+```markdown
+# For each completion candidate, check if the described feature exists
+verify_completion:
+  - Check git log for commits mentioning the action fid
+  - Check if files in the action's surface area exist
+  - If evidence found, recommend "close" with verification note
+```