create-byan-agent 2.0.1 → 2.1.0

package/_bmad/tea/workflows/testarch/trace/validation-report-20260127-095021.md

@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+---
+validationDate: 2026-01-27
+workflowName: testarch-trace
+workflowPath: /Users/murat.ozcan/opensource/bmad-method-test-architecture-enterprise/src/workflows/testarch/trace
+validationStatus: COMPLETE
+completionDate: 2026-01-27 10:03:10
+---
+
+# Validation Report: testarch-trace
+
+**Validation Started:** 2026-01-27 09:50:21
+**Validator:** BMAD Workflow Validation System (Codex)
+**Standards Version:** BMAD Workflow Standards
+
+## File Structure & Size
+
+- workflow.md present: YES
+- instructions.md present: YES
+- workflow.yaml present: YES
+- step files found: 8
+
+**Step File Sizes:**
+
+- steps-c/step-01-load-context.md: 73 lines [GOOD]
+- steps-c/step-02-discover-tests.md: 62 lines [GOOD]
+- steps-c/step-03-map-criteria.md: 58 lines [GOOD]
+- steps-c/step-04-analyze-gaps.md: 57 lines [GOOD]
+- steps-c/step-05-gate-decision.md: 66 lines [GOOD]
+- steps-e/step-01-assess.md: 51 lines [GOOD]
+- steps-e/step-02-apply-edit.md: 46 lines [GOOD]
+- steps-v/step-01-validate.md: 53 lines [GOOD]
+- workflow-plan.md present: YES
+
+## Frontmatter Validation
+
+- No frontmatter violations found
+
+## Critical Path Violations
+
+- No {project-root} hardcoded paths detected in body
+- No dead relative links detected
+
+## Menu Handling Validation
+
+- No menu structures detected (linear step flow) [N/A]
+
+## Step Type Validation
+
+- Last step steps-v/step-01-validate.md has no nextStepFile (final step OK)
+- Step type validation assumes linear sequence (no branching/menu). Workflow-plan.md present for reference. [INFO]
+
+## Output Format Validation
+
+- Templates present: trace-template.md
+- Steps with outputFile in frontmatter:
+  - steps-c/step-05-gate-decision.md
+  - steps-v/step-01-validate.md
+
+## Validation Design Check
+
+- checklist.md present: YES
+- Validation steps folder (steps-v) present: YES
+
+## Instruction Style Check
+
+- All steps include STEP GOAL, MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES, EXECUTION PROTOCOLS, CONTEXT BOUNDARIES, and SUCCESS/FAILURE metrics
+
+## Summary
+
+- Validation completed: 2026-01-27 10:03:10
+- Critical issues: 0
+- Warnings: 0 (informational notes only)
+- Readiness: READY (manual review optional)

package/_bmad/tea/workflows/testarch/trace/validation-report-20260127-102401.md

@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+---
+validationDate: 2026-01-27
+workflowName: testarch-trace
+workflowPath: /Users/murat.ozcan/opensource/bmad-method-test-architecture-enterprise/src/workflows/testarch/trace
+validationStatus: COMPLETE
+completionDate: 2026-01-27 10:24:01
+---
+
+# Validation Report: testarch-trace
+
+**Validation Started:** 2026-01-27 10:24:01
+**Validator:** BMAD Workflow Validation System (Codex)
+**Standards Version:** BMAD Workflow Standards
+
+## File Structure & Size
+
+- workflow.md present: YES
+- instructions.md present: YES
+- workflow.yaml present: YES
+- step files found: 8
+
+**Step File Sizes:**
+
+- steps-c/step-01-load-context.md: 72 lines [GOOD]
+- steps-c/step-02-discover-tests.md: 61 lines [GOOD]
+- steps-c/step-03-map-criteria.md: 57 lines [GOOD]
+- steps-c/step-04-analyze-gaps.md: 56 lines [GOOD]
+- steps-c/step-05-gate-decision.md: 65 lines [GOOD]
+- steps-e/step-01-assess.md: 50 lines [GOOD]
+- steps-e/step-02-apply-edit.md: 45 lines [GOOD]
+- steps-v/step-01-validate.md: 52 lines [GOOD]
+- workflow-plan.md present: YES
+
+## Frontmatter Validation
+
+- No frontmatter violations found
+
+## Critical Path Violations
+
+### Config Variables (Exceptions)
+
+Standard BMAD config variables treated as valid exceptions: bmb_creations_output_folder, communication_language, document_output_language, output_folder, planning_artifacts, project-root, project_name, test_artifacts, user_name
+
+- No {project-root} hardcoded paths detected in body
+
+- No dead relative links detected
+
+- No module path assumptions detected
+
+**Status:** ✅ PASS - No critical violations
+
+## Menu Handling Validation
+
+- No menu structures detected (linear step flow) [N/A]
+
+## Step Type Validation
+
+- steps-c/step-01-load-context.md: Init [PASS]
+- steps-c/step-02-discover-tests.md: Middle [PASS]
+- steps-c/step-03-map-criteria.md: Middle [PASS]
+- steps-c/step-04-analyze-gaps.md: Middle [PASS]
+- steps-c/step-05-gate-decision.md: Final [PASS]
+- Step type validation assumes linear sequence (no branching/menu). Workflow-plan.md present for reference. [INFO]
+
+## Output Format Validation
+
+- Templates present: trace-template.md
+- Steps with outputFile in frontmatter:
+  - steps-c/step-05-gate-decision.md
+  - steps-v/step-01-validate.md
+- checklist.md present: YES
+
+## Validation Design Check
+
+- Validation steps folder (steps-v) present: YES
+- Validation step(s) present: step-01-validate.md
+- Validation steps reference checklist data and auto-proceed
+
+## Instruction Style Check
+
+- Instruction style: Prescriptive (appropriate for TEA quality/compliance workflows)
+- Steps emphasize mandatory sequence, explicit success/failure metrics, and risk-based guidance
+
+## Collaborative Experience Check
+
+- Overall facilitation quality: GOOD
+- Steps use progressive prompts and clear role reinforcement; no laundry-list interrogation detected
+- Flow progression is clear and aligned to workflow goals
+
+## Subprocess Optimization Opportunities
+
+- No high-priority subprocess optimizations identified; workflow already uses step-file architecture
+- Pattern 1 (grep/regex): N/A for most steps
+- Pattern 2 (per-file analysis): already aligned to validation structure
+- Pattern 3 (data ops): minimal data file loads
+- Pattern 4 (parallel): optional for validation only
+
+## Cohesive Review
+
+- Overall assessment: GOOD
+- Flow is linear, goals are clear, and outputs map to TEA artifacts
+- Voice and tone consistent with Test Architect persona
+- Recommendation: READY (minor refinements optional)
+
+## Plan Quality Validation
+
+- Plan file present: workflow-plan.md
+- Planned steps found: 8 (all implemented)
+- Plan implementation status: Fully Implemented
+
+## Summary
+
+- Validation completed: 2026-01-27 10:24:01
+- Critical issues: 0
+- Warnings: 0 (informational notes only)
+- Readiness: READY (manual review optional)

package/_bmad/tea/workflows/testarch/trace/workflow-plan.md

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+    # Workflow Plan: testarch-trace
+
+    ## Create Mode (steps-c)
+    - step-01-load-context.md
+
+- step-02-discover-tests.md
+- step-03-map-criteria.md
+- step-04-analyze-gaps.md
+- step-05-gate-decision.md
+
+  ## Validate Mode (steps-v)
+  - step-01-validate.md
+
+  ## Edit Mode (steps-e)
+  - step-01-assess.md
+  - step-02-apply-edit.md
+
+  ## Outputs
+  - {output_folder}/traceability-matrix.md
+
+- Gate decision summary (if evidence available)

package/_bmad/tea/workflows/testarch/trace/workflow.md

@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+---
+name: testarch-trace
+description: 'Generate requirements-to-tests traceability matrix, analyze coverage, and make quality gate decision (PASS/CONCERNS/FAIL/WAIVED)'
+web_bundle: true
+---
+
+# Requirements Traceability & Quality Gate
+
+**Goal:** Generate requirements-to-tests traceability matrix, analyze coverage, and make quality gate decision (PASS/CONCERNS/FAIL/WAIVED)
+
+**Role:** You are the Master Test Architect.
+
+---
+
+## WORKFLOW ARCHITECTURE
+
+This workflow uses **tri-modal step-file architecture**:
+
+- **Create mode (steps-c/)**: primary execution flow
+- **Validate mode (steps-v/)**: validation against checklist
+- **Edit mode (steps-e/)**: revise existing outputs
+
+---
+
+## INITIALIZATION SEQUENCE
+
+### 1. Mode Determination
+
+"Welcome to the workflow. What would you like to do?"
+
+- **[C] Create** — Run the workflow
+- **[V] Validate** — Validate existing outputs
+- **[E] Edit** — Edit existing outputs
+
+### 2. Route to First Step
+
+- **If C:** Load `steps-c/step-01-load-context.md`
+- **If V:** Load `steps-v/step-01-validate.md`
+- **If E:** Load `steps-e/step-01-assess.md`

package/_bmad/tea/workflows/testarch/trace/workflow.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+# Test Architect workflow: trace (enhanced with gate decision)
+name: testarch-trace
+description: "Generate requirements-to-tests traceability matrix, analyze coverage, and make quality gate decision (PASS/CONCERNS/FAIL/WAIVED)"
+author: "BMad"
+
+# Critical variables from config
+config_source: "{project-root}/_bmad/tea/config.yaml"
+output_folder: "{config_source}:output_folder"
+user_name: "{config_source}:user_name"
+communication_language: "{config_source}:communication_language"
+document_output_language: "{config_source}:document_output_language"
+date: system-generated
+
+# Workflow components
+installed_path: "{project-root}/_bmad/tea/workflows/testarch/trace"
+instructions: "{installed_path}/instructions.md"
+validation: "{installed_path}/checklist.md"
+template: "{installed_path}/trace-template.md"
+
+# Variables and inputs
+variables:
+  # Directory paths
+  test_dir: "{project-root}/tests" # Root test directory
+  source_dir: "{project-root}" # Source code directory (customize if needed, e.g., {project-root}/src or {project-root}/lib)
+
+  # Workflow behavior
+  coverage_levels: "e2e,api,component,unit" # Which test levels to trace
+  gate_type: "story" # story | epic | release | hotfix - determines gate scope
+  decision_mode: "deterministic" # deterministic (rule-based) | manual (team decision)
+
+# Output configuration
+default_output_file: "{output_folder}/traceability-matrix.md"
+
+# Required tools
+required_tools:
+  - read_file # Read story, test files, BMad artifacts
+  - write_file # Create traceability matrix, gate YAML
+  - list_files # Discover test files
+  - search_repo # Find tests by test ID, describe blocks
+  - glob # Find test files matching patterns
+
+tags:
+  - qa
+  - traceability
+  - test-architect
+  - coverage
+  - requirements
+  - gate
+  - decision
+  - release
+
+execution_hints:
+  interactive: false # Minimize prompts
+  autonomous: true # Proceed without user input unless blocked
+  iterative: true

package/install/.eslintrc.js

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+module.exports = {
+  env: {
+    node: true,
+    es2021: true,
+    jest: true
+  },
+  extends: 'eslint:recommended',
+  parserOptions: {
+    ecmaVersion: 'latest',
+    sourceType: 'module'
+  },
+  rules: {
+    'no-console': 'off', // CLI tool, console is OK
+    'no-unused-vars': ['error', { argsIgnorePattern: '^_' }],
+    'semi': ['error', 'always'],
+    'quotes': ['error', 'single'],
+    'indent': ['error', 2],
+    'comma-dangle': ['error', 'never']
+  }
+};

package/install/.prettierrc

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "semi": true,
+  "singleQuote": true,
+  "trailingComma": "none",
+  "tabWidth": 2,
+  "printWidth": 100
+}

package/install/BUGFIX-CHALK.md

@@ -0,0 +1,173 @@
+# 🔧 BUGFIX: Chalk v5 ESM Compatibility Issue
+
+## Problème identifié
+
+```
+TypeError: chalk.blue is not a function
+at Object.<anonymous> (/tmp/testo/node_modules/create-byan-agent/bin/create-byan-agent.js:15:9)
+```
+
+## Cause racine
+
+**Chalk v5+ est ESM-only** mais `create-byan-agent.js` utilise CommonJS (`require()`).
+
+### Contexte technique
+
+- **Chalk v5.0+** : ESM uniquement (ne supporte plus `require()`)
+- **Inquirer v9+** : ESM uniquement
+- **Ora v7+** : ESM uniquement
+- **Notre script** : CommonJS (`#!/usr/bin/env node` + `require()`)
+
+### Manifestation
+
+Quand Node.js tente de `require('chalk')` avec v5+, l'import retourne un objet ESM incompatible avec CommonJS, causant `chalk.blue is not a function`.
+
+## Solution appliquée
+
+### ✅ Downgrade vers versions CommonJS-compatibles
+
+**Changements dans `package.json` et `package-npm.json` :**
+
+```diff
+  "dependencies": {
+-   "chalk": "^5.3.0",
++   "chalk": "^4.1.2",
+    "commander": "^11.1.0",
+-   "inquirer": "^9.2.12",
++   "inquirer": "^8.2.5",
+    "fs-extra": "^11.2.0",
+    "js-yaml": "^4.1.0",
+-   "ora": "^7.0.1"
++   "ora": "^5.4.1"
+  }
+```
+
+### Versions choisies
+
+| Package | Ancienne | Nouvelle | Raison |
+|---------|----------|----------|---------|
+| chalk | 5.3.0 | 4.1.2 | v4 = dernière version CommonJS |
+| inquirer | 9.2.12 | 8.2.5 | v8 = dernière version CommonJS |
+| ora | 7.0.1 | 5.4.1 | v5 = dernière version CommonJS |
+
+## Alternatives considérées
+
+### ❌ Option 2 : Convertir en ESM
+
+**Changements requis :**
+1. Renommer `.js` → `.mjs` ou ajouter `"type": "module"` dans `package.json`
+2. Remplacer `require()` → `import`
+3. Remplacer `__dirname` par `import.meta.url` + `fileURLToPath()`
+4. Adapter tous les imports
+
+**Inconvénients :**
+- Plus de travail
+- Risque de régression
+- Compatibilité Node.js <18 compromise
+- Shebang `#!/usr/bin/env node` peut poser problème avec ESM
+
+### ❌ Option 3 : Import dynamique
+
+```javascript
+const chalk = await import('chalk');
+// Mais nécessite async IIFE dans tout le script
+```
+
+**Inconvénients :**
+- Code plus complexe
+- Moins lisible
+- Nécessite restructuration complète
+
+## Tests effectués
+
+### ✅ Installation
+```bash
+cd /home/yan/conception/install
+npm install
+# added 57 packages, and audited 58 packages in 8s
+# found 0 vulnerabilities
+```
+
+### ✅ Exécution
+```bash
+node bin/create-byan-agent.js --version
+# 1.0.0
+
+node bin/create-byan-agent.js --help
+# Usage: create-byan-agent [options]
+# Install BYAN - Builder of YAN agent creator
+```
+
+### ✅ Banner display
+Le script affiche maintenant correctement le banner avec couleurs :
+```
+╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
+║                                                            ║
+║   🏗️  BYAN INSTALLER v1.0.0                               ║
+║   Builder of YAN - Agent Creator                          ║
+║                                                            ║
+║   Methodology: Merise Agile + TDD + 64 Mantras           ║
+║                                                            ║
+╚════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
+```
+
+## Mantras appliqués
+
+### ✅ Mantra #37 : Rasoir d'Ockham
+- Solution la plus simple : downgrade plutôt que refonte ESM
+- Résolution immédiate du problème
+- Minimise les risques
+
+### ✅ Mantra IA-1 : Trust But Verify
+- Tests effectués après correction
+- Vérification de l'installation
+- Validation de l'exécution
+
+### ✅ Mantra IA-16 : Challenge Before Confirm
+- Analyse de 3 solutions possibles
+- Évaluation des conséquences
+- Choix justifié de la solution optimale
+
+### ✅ Mantra #39 : Conséquences
+**Impact évalué :**
+- ✅ Compatibilité : Node.js >=14 (au lieu de >=18)
+- ✅ Fonctionnalité : Aucune perte
+- ✅ Sécurité : Versions stables et maintenues
+- ✅ Performance : Identique
+- ✅ Maintenance : Simplifiée (CommonJS standard)
+
+## Publication NPM
+
+Avant publication :
+
+```bash
+cd /home/yan/conception/install
+npm pack  # Test local
+npm publish --dry-run  # Simulation
+```
+
+Publication réelle (si nécessaire) :
+
+```bash
+npm login
+npm publish --access public  # Si scoped package @yan/create-byan-agent
+```
+
+## Recommandations futures
+
+1. **Court terme** : Garder versions CommonJS tant que le script l'est
+2. **Moyen terme** : Si besoin ESM, migrer TOUT le projet :
+   - Convertir `create-byan-agent.js` en ESM
+   - Utiliser `"type": "module"` dans `package.json`
+   - Mettre à jour vers Chalk v5+, Inquirer v9+, Ora v7+
+3. **Long terme** : Considérer TypeScript + ESM pour robustesse
+
+## Statut
+
+✅ **RÉSOLU** - Le script fonctionne maintenant correctement avec Node.js v23.11.1
+
+---
+
+**Date de correction** : 2026-02-02  
+**Correcteur** : BYAN (Builder of YAN)  
+**Méthodologie** : Merise Agile + TDD + 64 Mantras