create-agdf 0.8.6 → 0.8.7

package/generated/.github/skills/agdf-gate-check/SKILL.md

@@ -125,6 +125,17 @@ After each accepted gate approval is persisted, emit exactly one narration line
 
 When rendering the compact human Run Status Card, collapse internal sub-states (`verified_change` sub-states, `context_graph_required_action`, `multi_scope_state`) to stable human labels. `escalated`, `open_gap` and `blocked` remain explicitly visible. The full machine/audit projection retains all raw values unchanged. See the Runtime Contract §Internal-State Collapse for the complete mapping table.
 
+### On-Demand "Why?" Response
+
+When the user asks "why?" or "Warum?" at any gate or internal step, respond with a `status` interaction (not `gate_approval`):
+
+1. Pull the curated rationale from `gateRationale()` in the resolved locale.
+2. Compose one fulfilled line from the selected run's Approvals table and artefact status.
+3. Compose one protects-against line from the gate's rationale and the existing `primary.actions` copy.
+4. Do not show approval controls. Do not advance any gate. Do not merge with the approval envelope.
+
+The response is deterministic: same gate, same question, same answer. The `gate_approval` options remain exactly `approve | revise | decline | cancel`; no "why" option is added. See the Runtime Contract §Gate-Rationale-Registry and §On-Demand "Why?" Interaction for the full contract.
+
 ## Rules
 1. Fail closed when a required approval or artefact status is missing.
 2. The earliest blocking gate wins.

package/generated/.github/skills/agdf-interaction-locales.json

@@ -98,7 +98,12 @@
         "declineLabel": "Decline",
         "declineDescription": "Reject this gate deliberately; authority remains unchanged.",
         "cancelLabel": "Cancel",
-        "cancelDescription": "Close this decision without approving or declining it."
+        "cancelDescription": "Close this decision without approving or declining it.",
+        "why": {
+          "label": "Why?",
+          "fulfilledPrefix": "Fulfilled:",
+          "protectsPrefix": "Protects against:"
+        }
       },
       "artefacts": {
         "notYetCreated": "not yet created"
@@ -156,6 +161,20 @@
             "UAT": { "agentNext": "Agent prepares the delivery report" }
           }
         }
+      },
+      "gateRationale": {
+        "UR": "UR clarifies what you want, why and for whom — before anything gets built that nobody needed.",
+        "PRD": "PRD defines product behavior before the solution design locks it in.",
+        "SD": "Solution design fixes ownership, architecture and dependencies — before code makes them permanent.",
+        "TP": "Task plan makes acceptance criteria and tests binding, so QA can measure later.",
+        "QA": "QA evaluates real evidence before a release relies on assumptions.",
+        "UAT": "UAT requires deliberate acceptance before the run counts as delivered.",
+        "Brownfield Review": "Checks whether existing systems, owners and conventions are affected, so nothing breaks or duplicates.",
+        "Mode/Slice Decision": "Decides the proportionate delivery scope, so the process fits the change — not the other way around.",
+        "Brownfield Analysis": "Verifies reuse paths, owners and regression risk before code exists.",
+        "CD+Tests": "Implementation and tests produce evidence — not just code.",
+        "CR": "Code review is mandatory before QA decides.",
+        "OR": "The delivery report makes the run auditable — not just claimed."
       }
     },
     "de": {
@@ -248,7 +267,12 @@
         "declineLabel": "Ablehnen",
         "declineDescription": "Dieses Gate bewusst ablehnen; die Berechtigung bleibt unverändert.",
         "cancelLabel": "Abbrechen",
-        "cancelDescription": "Diese Entscheidung ohne Freigabe oder Ablehnung schließen."
+        "cancelDescription": "Diese Entscheidung ohne Freigabe oder Ablehnung schließen.",
+        "why": {
+          "label": "Warum?",
+          "fulfilledPrefix": "Erfüllt:",
+          "protectsPrefix": "Schützt vor:"
+        }
       },
       "artefacts": {
         "notYetCreated": "noch nicht erstellt"
@@ -306,6 +330,20 @@
             "UAT": { "agentNext": "Agent bereitet den Lieferbericht vor" }
           }
         }
+      },
+      "gateRationale": {
+        "UR": "UR klärt, was du willst, warum und für wen — bevor etwas gebaut wird, das niemand brauchte.",
+        "PRD": "PRD definiert das Produktverhalten, bevor das Lösungsdesign es zementiert.",
+        "SD": "Lösungsdesign legt Ownership, Architektur und Abhängigkeiten fest — bevor Code sie faktisch zementiert.",
+        "TP": "Taskplan macht Akzeptanzkriterien und Tests verbindlich, damit QA später messen kann.",
+        "QA": "QA bewertet die echten Nachweise, bevor eine Freigabe auf Vermutungen basiert.",
+        "UAT": "UAT verlangt eine bewusste Abnahme, bevor der Lauf als geliefert gilt.",
+        "Brownfield Review": "Prüft, ob bestehende Systeme, Owners und Konventionen betroffen sind, damit nichts kaputt geht oder doppelt entsteht.",
+        "Mode/Slice Decision": "Entscheidet den angemessenen Lieferumfang, damit der Prozess zur Veränderung passt — nicht umgekehrt.",
+        "Brownfield Analysis": "Verifiziert Wiederverwendung, Owners und Regressionstests, bevor Code existiert.",
+        "CD+Tests": "Implementierung und Tests liefern Nachweise — nicht nur Code.",
+        "CR": "Code-Review ist verpflichtend, bevor QA entscheidet.",
+        "OR": "Der Lieferbericht macht den Lauf auditierbar — nicht nur behauptet."
       }
     }
   }

package/generated/.github/skills/agdf-runtime-contract.md

@@ -545,6 +545,39 @@ fallback and human CLI output use the configured project chat language from
 
 The locale changes presentation only. It must not change gate meaning, option ordering, readiness, validation, revalidation or persistence. Host-provided free-text labels and skip actions are not AGDF-owned approval options and must never advance a gate.
 
+### Gate-Rationale-Registry
+
+The locale registry contains a deterministic, localized `gateRationale` section with one
+curated one-liner per gate and internal step. The agent retrieves rationale strings via
+the `gateRationale()` function; it does not generate rationale prose. Rationale strings
+are the same across invocations for the same gate and locale.
+
+The registry covers all user gates (`UR`, `PRD`, `SD`, `TP`, `QA`, `UAT`) and all internal
+steps (`Brownfield Review`, `Mode/Slice Decision`, `Brownfield Analysis`, `CD+Tests`, `CR`,
+`OR`). Each string stays within the declared `lengthBudgets.description` budget. Key parity
+across locale packs is enforced by the existing `validateLocaleRegistry` baseline
+comparison.
+
+A one-liner cannot explain the full protective function. The user needs enough to accept
+that the gate makes sense, not the complete rationale. Deeper context is available on
+demand through the "Why?" interaction.
+
+### On-Demand "Why?" Interaction
+
+When the user asks "why?" at any gate or internal step, the agent responds with a `status`
+interaction containing the curated rationale (Gate-Rationale-Registry) plus one line of
+fulfilled/protects context composed from existing state.
+
+- The response is deterministic, non-authorizing, and does not display approval controls.
+- It is a separate `status` interaction, never merged with the `gate_approval` sequence.
+- The `gate_approval` options remain exactly `approve | revise | decline | cancel`; no
+  "why" option is added.
+- The response never breaks `APPROVAL_SEQUENCE` or `validateApprovalOrientationSnapshot`.
+- Default output is unchanged when the user does not ask.
+- The fulfilled line is composed from the selected run's Approvals table and artefact
+  status; the protects-against line is composed from the gate's rationale and existing
+  `primary.actions` copy. The agent does not generate new prose.
+
 ### Human Decision Presentation Contract
 
 The primary user surface is a pure projection of the selected canonical run.

package/generated/.opencode/agdf-interaction-locales.json

@@ -98,7 +98,12 @@
         "declineLabel": "Decline",
         "declineDescription": "Reject this gate deliberately; authority remains unchanged.",
         "cancelLabel": "Cancel",
-        "cancelDescription": "Close this decision without approving or declining it."
+        "cancelDescription": "Close this decision without approving or declining it.",
+        "why": {
+          "label": "Why?",
+          "fulfilledPrefix": "Fulfilled:",
+          "protectsPrefix": "Protects against:"
+        }
       },
       "artefacts": {
         "notYetCreated": "not yet created"
@@ -156,6 +161,20 @@
             "UAT": { "agentNext": "Agent prepares the delivery report" }
           }
         }
+      },
+      "gateRationale": {
+        "UR": "UR clarifies what you want, why and for whom — before anything gets built that nobody needed.",
+        "PRD": "PRD defines product behavior before the solution design locks it in.",
+        "SD": "Solution design fixes ownership, architecture and dependencies — before code makes them permanent.",
+        "TP": "Task plan makes acceptance criteria and tests binding, so QA can measure later.",
+        "QA": "QA evaluates real evidence before a release relies on assumptions.",
+        "UAT": "UAT requires deliberate acceptance before the run counts as delivered.",
+        "Brownfield Review": "Checks whether existing systems, owners and conventions are affected, so nothing breaks or duplicates.",
+        "Mode/Slice Decision": "Decides the proportionate delivery scope, so the process fits the change — not the other way around.",
+        "Brownfield Analysis": "Verifies reuse paths, owners and regression risk before code exists.",
+        "CD+Tests": "Implementation and tests produce evidence — not just code.",
+        "CR": "Code review is mandatory before QA decides.",
+        "OR": "The delivery report makes the run auditable — not just claimed."
       }
     },
     "de": {
@@ -248,7 +267,12 @@
         "declineLabel": "Ablehnen",
         "declineDescription": "Dieses Gate bewusst ablehnen; die Berechtigung bleibt unverändert.",
         "cancelLabel": "Abbrechen",
-        "cancelDescription": "Diese Entscheidung ohne Freigabe oder Ablehnung schließen."
+        "cancelDescription": "Diese Entscheidung ohne Freigabe oder Ablehnung schließen.",
+        "why": {
+          "label": "Warum?",
+          "fulfilledPrefix": "Erfüllt:",
+          "protectsPrefix": "Schützt vor:"
+        }
       },
       "artefacts": {
         "notYetCreated": "noch nicht erstellt"
@@ -306,6 +330,20 @@
             "UAT": { "agentNext": "Agent bereitet den Lieferbericht vor" }
           }
         }
+      },
+      "gateRationale": {
+        "UR": "UR klärt, was du willst, warum und für wen — bevor etwas gebaut wird, das niemand brauchte.",
+        "PRD": "PRD definiert das Produktverhalten, bevor das Lösungsdesign es zementiert.",
+        "SD": "Lösungsdesign legt Ownership, Architektur und Abhängigkeiten fest — bevor Code sie faktisch zementiert.",
+        "TP": "Taskplan macht Akzeptanzkriterien und Tests verbindlich, damit QA später messen kann.",
+        "QA": "QA bewertet die echten Nachweise, bevor eine Freigabe auf Vermutungen basiert.",
+        "UAT": "UAT verlangt eine bewusste Abnahme, bevor der Lauf als geliefert gilt.",
+        "Brownfield Review": "Prüft, ob bestehende Systeme, Owners und Konventionen betroffen sind, damit nichts kaputt geht oder doppelt entsteht.",
+        "Mode/Slice Decision": "Entscheidet den angemessenen Lieferumfang, damit der Prozess zur Veränderung passt — nicht umgekehrt.",
+        "Brownfield Analysis": "Verifiziert Wiederverwendung, Owners und Regressionstests, bevor Code existiert.",
+        "CD+Tests": "Implementierung und Tests liefern Nachweise — nicht nur Code.",
+        "CR": "Code-Review ist verpflichtend, bevor QA entscheidet.",
+        "OR": "Der Lieferbericht macht den Lauf auditierbar — nicht nur behauptet."
       }
     }
   }

package/generated/.opencode/agdf-runtime-contract.md

@@ -545,6 +545,39 @@ fallback and human CLI output use the configured project chat language from
 
 The locale changes presentation only. It must not change gate meaning, option ordering, readiness, validation, revalidation or persistence. Host-provided free-text labels and skip actions are not AGDF-owned approval options and must never advance a gate.
 
+### Gate-Rationale-Registry
+
+The locale registry contains a deterministic, localized `gateRationale` section with one
+curated one-liner per gate and internal step. The agent retrieves rationale strings via
+the `gateRationale()` function; it does not generate rationale prose. Rationale strings
+are the same across invocations for the same gate and locale.
+
+The registry covers all user gates (`UR`, `PRD`, `SD`, `TP`, `QA`, `UAT`) and all internal
+steps (`Brownfield Review`, `Mode/Slice Decision`, `Brownfield Analysis`, `CD+Tests`, `CR`,
+`OR`). Each string stays within the declared `lengthBudgets.description` budget. Key parity
+across locale packs is enforced by the existing `validateLocaleRegistry` baseline
+comparison.
+
+A one-liner cannot explain the full protective function. The user needs enough to accept
+that the gate makes sense, not the complete rationale. Deeper context is available on
+demand through the "Why?" interaction.
+
+### On-Demand "Why?" Interaction
+
+When the user asks "why?" at any gate or internal step, the agent responds with a `status`
+interaction containing the curated rationale (Gate-Rationale-Registry) plus one line of
+fulfilled/protects context composed from existing state.
+
+- The response is deterministic, non-authorizing, and does not display approval controls.
+- It is a separate `status` interaction, never merged with the `gate_approval` sequence.
+- The `gate_approval` options remain exactly `approve | revise | decline | cancel`; no
+  "why" option is added.
+- The response never breaks `APPROVAL_SEQUENCE` or `validateApprovalOrientationSnapshot`.
+- Default output is unchanged when the user does not ask.
+- The fulfilled line is composed from the selected run's Approvals table and artefact
+  status; the protects-against line is composed from the gate's rationale and existing
+  `primary.actions` copy. The agent does not generate new prose.
+
 ### Human Decision Presentation Contract
 
 The primary user surface is a pure projection of the selected canonical run.

package/generated/.opencode/skills/agdf-gate-check/SKILL.md

@@ -125,6 +125,17 @@ After each accepted gate approval is persisted, emit exactly one narration line
 
 When rendering the compact human Run Status Card, collapse internal sub-states (`verified_change` sub-states, `context_graph_required_action`, `multi_scope_state`) to stable human labels. `escalated`, `open_gap` and `blocked` remain explicitly visible. The full machine/audit projection retains all raw values unchanged. See the Runtime Contract §Internal-State Collapse for the complete mapping table.
 
+### On-Demand "Why?" Response
+
+When the user asks "why?" or "Warum?" at any gate or internal step, respond with a `status` interaction (not `gate_approval`):
+
+1. Pull the curated rationale from `gateRationale()` in the resolved locale.
+2. Compose one fulfilled line from the selected run's Approvals table and artefact status.
+3. Compose one protects-against line from the gate's rationale and the existing `primary.actions` copy.
+4. Do not show approval controls. Do not advance any gate. Do not merge with the approval envelope.
+
+The response is deterministic: same gate, same question, same answer. The `gate_approval` options remain exactly `approve | revise | decline | cancel`; no "why" option is added. See the Runtime Contract §Gate-Rationale-Registry and §On-Demand "Why?" Interaction for the full contract.
+
 ## Rules
 1. Fail closed when a required approval or artefact status is missing.
 2. The earliest blocking gate wins.

package/generated/plugins/agdf/.codex-plugin/plugin.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "agdf",
-  "version": "0.8.6",
+  "version": "0.8.7",
   "description": "Codex-first operating system for governed AI-assisted delivery.",
   "author": {
     "name": "Arndt Gold",

package/generated/plugins/agdf/meta/agdf-interaction-locales.json

@@ -98,7 +98,12 @@
         "declineLabel": "Decline",
         "declineDescription": "Reject this gate deliberately; authority remains unchanged.",
         "cancelLabel": "Cancel",
-        "cancelDescription": "Close this decision without approving or declining it."
+        "cancelDescription": "Close this decision without approving or declining it.",
+        "why": {
+          "label": "Why?",
+          "fulfilledPrefix": "Fulfilled:",
+          "protectsPrefix": "Protects against:"
+        }
       },
       "artefacts": {
         "notYetCreated": "not yet created"
@@ -156,6 +161,20 @@
             "UAT": { "agentNext": "Agent prepares the delivery report" }
           }
         }
+      },
+      "gateRationale": {
+        "UR": "UR clarifies what you want, why and for whom — before anything gets built that nobody needed.",
+        "PRD": "PRD defines product behavior before the solution design locks it in.",
+        "SD": "Solution design fixes ownership, architecture and dependencies — before code makes them permanent.",
+        "TP": "Task plan makes acceptance criteria and tests binding, so QA can measure later.",
+        "QA": "QA evaluates real evidence before a release relies on assumptions.",
+        "UAT": "UAT requires deliberate acceptance before the run counts as delivered.",
+        "Brownfield Review": "Checks whether existing systems, owners and conventions are affected, so nothing breaks or duplicates.",
+        "Mode/Slice Decision": "Decides the proportionate delivery scope, so the process fits the change — not the other way around.",
+        "Brownfield Analysis": "Verifies reuse paths, owners and regression risk before code exists.",
+        "CD+Tests": "Implementation and tests produce evidence — not just code.",
+        "CR": "Code review is mandatory before QA decides.",
+        "OR": "The delivery report makes the run auditable — not just claimed."
       }
     },
     "de": {
@@ -248,7 +267,12 @@
         "declineLabel": "Ablehnen",
         "declineDescription": "Dieses Gate bewusst ablehnen; die Berechtigung bleibt unverändert.",
         "cancelLabel": "Abbrechen",
-        "cancelDescription": "Diese Entscheidung ohne Freigabe oder Ablehnung schließen."
+        "cancelDescription": "Diese Entscheidung ohne Freigabe oder Ablehnung schließen.",
+        "why": {
+          "label": "Warum?",
+          "fulfilledPrefix": "Erfüllt:",
+          "protectsPrefix": "Schützt vor:"
+        }
       },
       "artefacts": {
         "notYetCreated": "noch nicht erstellt"
@@ -306,6 +330,20 @@
             "UAT": { "agentNext": "Agent bereitet den Lieferbericht vor" }
           }
         }
+      },
+      "gateRationale": {
+        "UR": "UR klärt, was du willst, warum und für wen — bevor etwas gebaut wird, das niemand brauchte.",
+        "PRD": "PRD definiert das Produktverhalten, bevor das Lösungsdesign es zementiert.",
+        "SD": "Lösungsdesign legt Ownership, Architektur und Abhängigkeiten fest — bevor Code sie faktisch zementiert.",
+        "TP": "Taskplan macht Akzeptanzkriterien und Tests verbindlich, damit QA später messen kann.",
+        "QA": "QA bewertet die echten Nachweise, bevor eine Freigabe auf Vermutungen basiert.",
+        "UAT": "UAT verlangt eine bewusste Abnahme, bevor der Lauf als geliefert gilt.",
+        "Brownfield Review": "Prüft, ob bestehende Systeme, Owners und Konventionen betroffen sind, damit nichts kaputt geht oder doppelt entsteht.",
+        "Mode/Slice Decision": "Entscheidet den angemessenen Lieferumfang, damit der Prozess zur Veränderung passt — nicht umgekehrt.",
+        "Brownfield Analysis": "Verifiziert Wiederverwendung, Owners und Regressionstests, bevor Code existiert.",
+        "CD+Tests": "Implementierung und Tests liefern Nachweise — nicht nur Code.",
+        "CR": "Code-Review ist verpflichtend, bevor QA entscheidet.",
+        "OR": "Der Lieferbericht macht den Lauf auditierbar — nicht nur behauptet."
       }
     }
   }

package/generated/plugins/agdf/meta/agdf-plugin.definition.json

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 {
   "schemaVersion": 1,
   "id": "agdf",
-  "version": "0.8.6",
+  "version": "0.8.7",
   "displayName": "AI Governance & Delivery Framework",
   "developerName": "Arndt Gold",
   "description": "Codex-first operating system for governed AI-assisted delivery.",

package/generated/plugins/agdf/meta/agdf-runtime-contract.md

@@ -545,6 +545,39 @@ fallback and human CLI output use the configured project chat language from
 
 The locale changes presentation only. It must not change gate meaning, option ordering, readiness, validation, revalidation or persistence. Host-provided free-text labels and skip actions are not AGDF-owned approval options and must never advance a gate.
 
+### Gate-Rationale-Registry
+
+The locale registry contains a deterministic, localized `gateRationale` section with one
+curated one-liner per gate and internal step. The agent retrieves rationale strings via
+the `gateRationale()` function; it does not generate rationale prose. Rationale strings
+are the same across invocations for the same gate and locale.
+
+The registry covers all user gates (`UR`, `PRD`, `SD`, `TP`, `QA`, `UAT`) and all internal
+steps (`Brownfield Review`, `Mode/Slice Decision`, `Brownfield Analysis`, `CD+Tests`, `CR`,
+`OR`). Each string stays within the declared `lengthBudgets.description` budget. Key parity
+across locale packs is enforced by the existing `validateLocaleRegistry` baseline
+comparison.
+
+A one-liner cannot explain the full protective function. The user needs enough to accept
+that the gate makes sense, not the complete rationale. Deeper context is available on
+demand through the "Why?" interaction.
+
+### On-Demand "Why?" Interaction
+
+When the user asks "why?" at any gate or internal step, the agent responds with a `status`
+interaction containing the curated rationale (Gate-Rationale-Registry) plus one line of
+fulfilled/protects context composed from existing state.
+
+- The response is deterministic, non-authorizing, and does not display approval controls.
+- It is a separate `status` interaction, never merged with the `gate_approval` sequence.
+- The `gate_approval` options remain exactly `approve | revise | decline | cancel`; no
+  "why" option is added.
+- The response never breaks `APPROVAL_SEQUENCE` or `validateApprovalOrientationSnapshot`.
+- Default output is unchanged when the user does not ask.
+- The fulfilled line is composed from the selected run's Approvals table and artefact
+  status; the protects-against line is composed from the gate's rationale and existing
+  `primary.actions` copy. The agent does not generate new prose.
+
 ### Human Decision Presentation Contract
 
 The primary user surface is a pure projection of the selected canonical run.

package/generated/plugins/agdf/skills/gate-check/SKILL.md

@@ -125,6 +125,17 @@ After each accepted gate approval is persisted, emit exactly one narration line
 
 When rendering the compact human Run Status Card, collapse internal sub-states (`verified_change` sub-states, `context_graph_required_action`, `multi_scope_state`) to stable human labels. `escalated`, `open_gap` and `blocked` remain explicitly visible. The full machine/audit projection retains all raw values unchanged. See the Runtime Contract §Internal-State Collapse for the complete mapping table.
 
+### On-Demand "Why?" Response
+
+When the user asks "why?" or "Warum?" at any gate or internal step, respond with a `status` interaction (not `gate_approval`):
+
+1. Pull the curated rationale from `gateRationale()` in the resolved locale.
+2. Compose one fulfilled line from the selected run's Approvals table and artefact status.
+3. Compose one protects-against line from the gate's rationale and the existing `primary.actions` copy.
+4. Do not show approval controls. Do not advance any gate. Do not merge with the approval envelope.
+
+The response is deterministic: same gate, same question, same answer. The `gate_approval` options remain exactly `approve | revise | decline | cancel`; no "why" option is added. See the Runtime Contract §Gate-Rationale-Registry and §On-Demand "Why?" Interaction for the full contract.
+
 ## Rules
 1. Fail closed when a required approval or artefact status is missing.
 2. The earliest blocking gate wins.

package/lib/interaction-presentation.js

@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ export function validateLocaleRegistry(registry) {
     for (const [key, value] of visibleStrings(pack)) {
       if (!value.trim()) errors.push(`empty_copy:${locale}:${key}`);
       const budget = key.startsWith("gateTitles.") ? budgets.title
-        : key.includes("Description") || key.includes("fallbackReasons") || key.startsWith("primary.actions.") || key.startsWith("primary.afterApproval.") || key.startsWith("primary.narration.") || key === "primary.quality"
+        : key.includes("Description") || key.includes("fallbackReasons") || key.startsWith("primary.actions.") || key.startsWith("primary.afterApproval.") || key.startsWith("primary.narration.") || key.startsWith("gateRationale.") || key.startsWith("interaction.why.") || key === "primary.quality"
           ? budgets.description
           : budgets.label;
       if (Number.isInteger(budget) && value.length > budget) errors.push(`length_budget:${locale}:${key}`);
@@ -97,6 +97,10 @@ export function gateTitle(registry, requestedLocale, gate) {
   return localePack(registry, requestedLocale).gateTitles[gate] || String(gate || "");
 }
 
+export function gateRationale(registry, requestedLocale, gate) {
+  return localePack(registry, requestedLocale).gateRationale?.[gate] || String(gate || "");
+}
+
 function stripMarkdown(value) {
   return String(value ?? "")
     .replace(/^#+\s*/, "")

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "create-agdf",
-  "version": "0.8.6",
+  "version": "0.8.7",
   "description": "Bootstrap AGDF repository-local plugin files, Copilot/OpenCode instructions, skills, control files and machine-readable checks.",
   "type": "module",
   "files": [