create-agdf 0.4.6 → 0.4.8

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ import process from "node:process";
9
9
  import { searchInputFromControl } from "../lib/delivery-path-search/state-adapter.js";
10
10
  import { runDeliveryPathSearch } from "../lib/delivery-path-search/search-engine.js";
11
11
  import { codexEvaluator } from "../lib/delivery-path-search/evaluators/codex.js";
12
+ import { claudeEvaluator } from "../lib/delivery-path-search/evaluators/claude.js";
12
13
  import { fixtureEvaluator } from "../lib/delivery-path-search/evaluators/protocol.js";
13
14
  import { enforcementForSurface } from "../lib/delivery-path-search/surfaces/capabilities.js";
14
15
  import { persistSearchResult } from "../lib/delivery-path-search/persistence.js";
@@ -175,6 +176,7 @@ Preferred AGDF CLI:
175
176
  npx --yes @agdf/cli@latest doctor
176
177
  npx --yes @agdf/cli@latest gate-check --json
177
178
  npx --yes @agdf/cli@latest delivery-path-search --surface codex --json
179
+ npx --yes @agdf/cli@latest delivery-path-search --surface claude --json
178
180
 
179
181
  Scaffold-compatible npm create usage:
180
182
  npm create agdf@latest -- codex
@@ -191,6 +193,7 @@ Scaffold-compatible npm create usage:
191
193
  npm create agdf@latest -- gate-check
192
194
  npm create agdf@latest -- delivery-map
193
195
  npm create agdf@latest -- delivery-path-search --surface codex
196
+ npm create agdf@latest -- delivery-path-search --surface claude
194
197
 
195
198
  Backward-compatible create-agdf usage:
196
199
  npx --yes create-agdf@latest doctor --json
@@ -1723,6 +1726,40 @@ function deriveQualityOutlook(runState, findings = []) {
1723
1726
  return "No additional quality follow-up identified from the current control state.";
1724
1727
  }
1725
1728
 
1729
+ function postApprovalTransition(missingApproval) {
1730
+ const transitions = new Map([
1731
+ ["Approval: UR", {
1732
+ next_gate_after_approval: "Brownfield Review",
1733
+ allowed_after_approval: "Run Brownfield Review and record Mode/Slice Decision before PRD or implementation.",
1734
+ }],
1735
+ ["Approval: PRD", {
1736
+ next_gate_after_approval: "SD",
1737
+ allowed_after_approval: "Draft Solution Design; implementation remains forbidden.",
1738
+ }],
1739
+ ["Approval: SD", {
1740
+ next_gate_after_approval: "TP",
1741
+ allowed_after_approval: "Draft Task/Test Plan; implementation remains forbidden.",
1742
+ }],
1743
+ ["Approval: TP", {
1744
+ next_gate_after_approval: "Brownfield Analysis",
1745
+ allowed_after_approval: "Run implementation-prep Brownfield Analysis before CD+Tests.",
1746
+ }],
1747
+ ["Approval: QA", {
1748
+ next_gate_after_approval: "UAT",
1749
+ allowed_after_approval: "Request UAT when QA has passed; release remains gated.",
1750
+ }],
1751
+ ["Approval: UAT", {
1752
+ next_gate_after_approval: "OR",
1753
+ allowed_after_approval: "Produce OR or delivery closeout; VCS and release actions still require explicit instruction.",
1754
+ }],
1755
+ ]);
1756
+
1757
+ return transitions.get(missingApproval) ?? {
1758
+ next_gate_after_approval: "none",
1759
+ allowed_after_approval: "none",
1760
+ };
1761
+ }
1762
+
1726
1763
  function buildStatusCard({
1727
1764
  status,
1728
1765
  currentGate,
@@ -1735,6 +1772,7 @@ function buildStatusCard({
1735
1772
  findings = [],
1736
1773
  }) {
1737
1774
  const qualityOutlook = deriveQualityOutlook(runState, findings);
1775
+ const postApproval = postApprovalTransition(missingApproval);
1738
1776
  return {
1739
1777
  mode: extractField(runState.content ?? "", "mode") || "unknown",
1740
1778
  status,
@@ -1744,6 +1782,8 @@ function buildStatusCard({
1744
1782
  forbidden_now: forbidden,
1745
1783
  blocking_condition: blockingReason || "none",
1746
1784
  missing_approval: missingApproval || "none",
1785
+ next_gate_after_approval: postApproval.next_gate_after_approval,
1786
+ allowed_after_approval: postApproval.allowed_after_approval,
1747
1787
  evidence: runState.evidence_refs,
1748
1788
  next_skill: nextSkillByGate[currentGate] ?? "gate-check",
1749
1789
  next_step: nextAllowedAction,
@@ -1987,12 +2027,16 @@ function evaluateGateCheck(targetDir) {
1987
2027
  : doctorRevise.next_step;
1988
2028
  }
1989
2029
 
2030
+ const postApproval = postApprovalTransition(missingApproval);
2031
+
1990
2032
  return {
1991
2033
  schema_version: "1",
1992
2034
  status,
1993
2035
  current_gate: currentGate,
1994
2036
  blocking_reason: blockingReason,
1995
2037
  missing_approval: missingApproval,
2038
+ next_gate_after_approval: postApproval.next_gate_after_approval,
2039
+ allowed_after_approval: postApproval.allowed_after_approval,
1996
2040
  allowed,
1997
2041
  forbidden,
1998
2042
  next_allowed_action: nextAllowedAction,
@@ -2029,6 +2073,8 @@ function printGateCheckStatusCard(report) {
2029
2073
  console.log(`Current gate: ${card.current_gate}`);
2030
2074
  console.log(`Blocked by: ${card.blocking_condition}`);
2031
2075
  console.log(`Missing approval: ${card.missing_approval}`);
2076
+ if (card.next_gate_after_approval !== "none") console.log(`Next gate after approval: ${card.next_gate_after_approval}`);
2077
+ if (card.allowed_after_approval !== "none") console.log(`Allowed after approval: ${card.allowed_after_approval}`);
2032
2078
  console.log(`Next skill: ${card.next_skill}`);
2033
2079
  console.log(`Next step: ${card.next_step}`);
2034
2080
  console.log(`Quality outlook: ${card.quality_outlook}`);
@@ -2087,6 +2133,7 @@ function evaluateDeliveryMap(targetDir) {
2087
2133
 
2088
2134
  const qualityOutlook = deriveQualityOutlook(runState, map.findings);
2089
2135
  const nextAllowedAction = isPlaceholderValue(runState.next_allowed_action) ? gateDecision.next_allowed_action : runState.next_allowed_action;
2136
+ const postApproval = postApprovalTransition(gateDecision.missing_approval);
2090
2137
 
2091
2138
  return {
2092
2139
  schema_version: "1",
@@ -2095,6 +2142,8 @@ function evaluateDeliveryMap(targetDir) {
2095
2142
  target_dir: targetDir,
2096
2143
  current_gate: currentGate,
2097
2144
  next_allowed_action: nextAllowedAction,
2145
+ next_gate_after_approval: postApproval.next_gate_after_approval,
2146
+ allowed_after_approval: postApproval.allowed_after_approval,
2098
2147
  quality_outlook: qualityOutlook,
2099
2148
  status_card: buildStatusCard({
2100
2149
  status,
@@ -2154,9 +2203,11 @@ async function executeDeliveryPathSearch(options) {
2154
2203
  ? fixtureEvaluator(fixture.evaluations ?? {})
2155
2204
  : options.surface === "codex"
2156
2205
  ? codexEvaluator({ cwd: options.dir, model: options.model })
2157
- : null;
2206
+ : options.surface === "claude"
2207
+ ? claudeEvaluator({ cwd: options.dir, model: options.model })
2208
+ : null;
2158
2209
  if (!evaluator) {
2159
- throw new Error(`${options.surface} has no executable evaluator in this release. Codex is the reference adapter; --fixture is available for deterministic contract testing.`);
2210
+ throw new Error(`${options.surface} has no executable evaluator in this release. Codex and Claude are the reference adapters; --fixture is available for deterministic contract testing.`);
2160
2211
  }
2161
2212
  const result = await runDeliveryPathSearch(input, evaluator, { candidates: fixture?.candidates });
2162
2213
  if (options.persist) result.persistence = persistSearchResult(options.dir, result);
@@ -15,6 +15,9 @@ This file is the living control pointer for active AGDF delivery work. Detailed
15
15
  9. Historical artefacts remain linkable but do not override the current pointer.
16
16
  10. If an item is superseded, mark the replacement.
17
17
  11. If active work grows beyond roughly ten items, triage the backlog.
18
+ 12. `Status` must be one of the human-readable labels `create-agdf/bin/create-agdf.js`'s `backlogStatusLabels` normalizes: Needs UR, Awaiting Brownfield Review, Awaiting PRD, Awaiting PRD Approval, Awaiting SD, Awaiting SD Approval, Awaiting TP, Awaiting TP Approval, In Progress, Blocked, Awaiting QA, Awaiting UAT, Completed, Superseded, Abandoned. That map is authoritative; this list only mirrors it for readability.
19
+ 13. `Artefacts` link labels must be one of `backlogArtefactLabels`: `ur`, `brownfield`, `prd`, `sd`, `tp`, `qa`, `or` (case-insensitive). Do not invent other labels such as a raw artefact filename.
20
+ 14. After writing or updating this file, run `doctor --json` (or the locally available equivalent) and resolve any `AGDF_BACKLOG_STATUS_UNKNOWN` or `AGDF_BACKLOG_ARTEFACT_LABEL_UNKNOWN` finding before treating the edit as done.
18
21
 
19
22
  ## Active Backlog
20
23
 
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ The CLI reports are validators and JSON evidence, not the primary user experienc
70
70
  15. Missing or incomplete control state must not push setup work back to the user. For a fresh request, draft the current minimal artefact in the response and request the exact approval. Initialize or write `.agdf/control/` only when durable control state is explicitly requested, already live for the repository, or required for a deterministic CLI/CI setup path. Implementation remains forbidden.
71
71
  16. Branch names, uncommitted diffs, generated summaries and chat history are not sufficient scope proof when durable artefacts or approvals are missing or conflicting.
72
72
  17. If multiple active scopes are plausible, list the evidenced competing lines and keep the current step at scope clarification or the earliest common safe gate.
73
- 18. When maintaining `MASTER_BACKLOG.md`, use its canonical compact columns, readable status labels and document-relative Markdown links. Do not expose raw long paths or internal snake_case statuses in the human-facing table.
73
+ 18. When maintaining `MASTER_BACKLOG.md`, use its canonical compact columns, readable status labels and document-relative Markdown links. Do not expose raw long paths or internal snake_case statuses in the human-facing table. The canonical status/artefact label vocabulary is defined in the AGDF control scaffold's `MASTER_BACKLOG.md` template Rules section; do not invent other labels.
74
74
  19. Preserve legacy backlog compatibility through the CLI parser; do not create a second surface-specific backlog format.
75
75
 
76
76
  ## Gate Evaluation
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ Use the Runtime Contract definition of `Relevant Run` to decide whether OR is ma
46
46
  12. Keep machine status normalization in the CLI; do not write internal snake_case status values into the human-facing backlog.
47
47
  13. Reconcile Context Graph impact before clean closeout: report `context_graph_reconciliation: resolved | not_applicable | open_gap`.
48
48
  14. If Context Graph work remains unresolved, report it as an explicit open gap and do not describe the run as cleanly handoff-ready.
49
+ 15. After writing or updating `MASTER_BACKLOG.md`, run `doctor --json` (or the locally available equivalent) and resolve any `AGDF_BACKLOG_STATUS_UNKNOWN` or `AGDF_BACKLOG_ARTEFACT_LABEL_UNKNOWN` finding before closeout. See the AGDF control scaffold's `MASTER_BACKLOG.md` template Rules section for the canonical status/artefact label vocabulary.
49
50
 
50
51
  ## When To Use
51
52
  - at the end of every relevant run
@@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ It must not introduce a second gate model or override `agdf-gate-check`, `delive
40
40
  - `forbidden_now`: outputs or actions currently forbidden
41
41
  - `blocking_condition`: current blocker or `none`
42
42
  - `missing_approval`: exact missing approval formula or `none`
43
+ - `next_gate_after_approval`: the next user gate or internal step unlocked by the missing approval, or `none`
44
+ - `allowed_after_approval`: concise description of what becomes allowed after the missing approval, or `none`
43
45
  - `evidence`: concrete evidence references currently visible
44
46
  - `next_skill`: next AGDF skill or `none`
45
47
  - `next_step`: the single next permissible process action
@@ -52,6 +54,13 @@ It must not introduce a second gate model or override `agdf-gate-check`, `delive
52
54
 
53
55
  `quality_outlook` must not unlock gates, imply QA pass, or substitute for missing evidence.
54
56
 
57
+ `allowed_now` and `allowed_after_approval` are intentionally different:
58
+
59
+ - `allowed_now` is current authority under the active gate.
60
+ - `allowed_after_approval` is the immediate authority unlocked only after the exact `missing_approval` is supplied.
61
+
62
+ `next_gate_after_approval` and `allowed_after_approval` must be `none` when no approval is missing, when the current step is internal, or when the run is in OR/completed handoff. They must not imply implementation, QA, release, commit, push or PR authority unless the existing gate model already allows that authority.
63
+
55
64
  ## Delivery Path Search
56
65
 
57
66
  Delivery Path Search is an optional read-only planning step for high-impact decisions with several materially different next actions.
@@ -69,7 +78,8 @@ reports and automation. Human-facing Markdown must present the same projection
69
78
  with readable labels such as `Current gate`, `Allowed now`, `Blocked by`,
70
79
  `Next step` and `Quality outlook`; do not expose snake_case keys as the visible
71
80
  Run Status Card. Keep that card compact: show `Status`, `Current gate`,
72
- `Allowed now`, `Blocked by`, `Missing approval`, `Next step` and
81
+ `Allowed now`, `Blocked by`, `Missing approval`, `Next gate after approval`
82
+ and `Allowed after approval` when a missing approval exists, `Next step` and
73
83
  `Quality outlook`. Keep mode, forbidden actions, evidence and next-skill detail
74
84
  in the surrounding control artefact when they are relevant.
75
85
 
@@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ It must not introduce a second gate model or override `agdf-gate-check`, `delive
40
40
  - `forbidden_now`: outputs or actions currently forbidden
41
41
  - `blocking_condition`: current blocker or `none`
42
42
  - `missing_approval`: exact missing approval formula or `none`
43
+ - `next_gate_after_approval`: the next user gate or internal step unlocked by the missing approval, or `none`
44
+ - `allowed_after_approval`: concise description of what becomes allowed after the missing approval, or `none`
43
45
  - `evidence`: concrete evidence references currently visible
44
46
  - `next_skill`: next AGDF skill or `none`
45
47
  - `next_step`: the single next permissible process action
@@ -52,6 +54,13 @@ It must not introduce a second gate model or override `agdf-gate-check`, `delive
52
54
 
53
55
  `quality_outlook` must not unlock gates, imply QA pass, or substitute for missing evidence.
54
56
 
57
+ `allowed_now` and `allowed_after_approval` are intentionally different:
58
+
59
+ - `allowed_now` is current authority under the active gate.
60
+ - `allowed_after_approval` is the immediate authority unlocked only after the exact `missing_approval` is supplied.
61
+
62
+ `next_gate_after_approval` and `allowed_after_approval` must be `none` when no approval is missing, when the current step is internal, or when the run is in OR/completed handoff. They must not imply implementation, QA, release, commit, push or PR authority unless the existing gate model already allows that authority.
63
+
55
64
  ## Delivery Path Search
56
65
 
57
66
  Delivery Path Search is an optional read-only planning step for high-impact decisions with several materially different next actions.
@@ -69,7 +78,8 @@ reports and automation. Human-facing Markdown must present the same projection
69
78
  with readable labels such as `Current gate`, `Allowed now`, `Blocked by`,
70
79
  `Next step` and `Quality outlook`; do not expose snake_case keys as the visible
71
80
  Run Status Card. Keep that card compact: show `Status`, `Current gate`,
72
- `Allowed now`, `Blocked by`, `Missing approval`, `Next step` and
81
+ `Allowed now`, `Blocked by`, `Missing approval`, `Next gate after approval`
82
+ and `Allowed after approval` when a missing approval exists, `Next step` and
73
83
  `Quality outlook`. Keep mode, forbidden actions, evidence and next-skill detail
74
84
  in the surrounding control artefact when they are relevant.
75
85
 
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ The CLI reports are validators and JSON evidence, not the primary user experienc
70
70
  15. Missing or incomplete control state must not push setup work back to the user. For a fresh request, draft the current minimal artefact in the response and request the exact approval. Initialize or write `.agdf/control/` only when durable control state is explicitly requested, already live for the repository, or required for a deterministic CLI/CI setup path. Implementation remains forbidden.
71
71
  16. Branch names, uncommitted diffs, generated summaries and chat history are not sufficient scope proof when durable artefacts or approvals are missing or conflicting.
72
72
  17. If multiple active scopes are plausible, list the evidenced competing lines and keep the current step at scope clarification or the earliest common safe gate.
73
- 18. When maintaining `MASTER_BACKLOG.md`, use its canonical compact columns, readable status labels and document-relative Markdown links. Do not expose raw long paths or internal snake_case statuses in the human-facing table.
73
+ 18. When maintaining `MASTER_BACKLOG.md`, use its canonical compact columns, readable status labels and document-relative Markdown links. Do not expose raw long paths or internal snake_case statuses in the human-facing table. The canonical status/artefact label vocabulary is defined in the AGDF control scaffold's `MASTER_BACKLOG.md` template Rules section; do not invent other labels.
74
74
  19. Preserve legacy backlog compatibility through the CLI parser; do not create a second surface-specific backlog format.
75
75
 
76
76
  ## Gate Evaluation
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ Use the Runtime Contract definition of `Relevant Run` to decide whether OR is ma
46
46
  12. Keep machine status normalization in the CLI; do not write internal snake_case status values into the human-facing backlog.
47
47
  13. Reconcile Context Graph impact before clean closeout: report `context_graph_reconciliation: resolved | not_applicable | open_gap`.
48
48
  14. If Context Graph work remains unresolved, report it as an explicit open gap and do not describe the run as cleanly handoff-ready.
49
+ 15. After writing or updating `MASTER_BACKLOG.md`, run `doctor --json` (or the locally available equivalent) and resolve any `AGDF_BACKLOG_STATUS_UNKNOWN` or `AGDF_BACKLOG_ARTEFACT_LABEL_UNKNOWN` finding before closeout. See the AGDF control scaffold's `MASTER_BACKLOG.md` template Rules section for the canonical status/artefact label vocabulary.
49
50
 
50
51
  ## When To Use
51
52
  - at the end of every relevant run
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "agdf",
3
- "version": "0.4.6",
3
+ "version": "0.4.8",
4
4
  "description": "Codex-first workflow skills for gated, auditable AI-assisted software delivery.",
5
5
  "author": {
6
- "name": "AI-native Governance & Delivery Framework",
6
+ "name": "Arndt Gold",
7
7
  "url": "https://agdf.iself.eu"
8
8
  },
9
9
  "homepage": "https://agdf.iself.eu",
@@ -15,6 +15,9 @@ This file is the living control pointer for active AGDF delivery work. Detailed
15
15
  9. Historical artefacts remain linkable but do not override the current pointer.
16
16
  10. If an item is superseded, mark the replacement.
17
17
  11. If active work grows beyond roughly ten items, triage the backlog.
18
+ 12. `Status` must be one of the human-readable labels `create-agdf/bin/create-agdf.js`'s `backlogStatusLabels` normalizes: Needs UR, Awaiting Brownfield Review, Awaiting PRD, Awaiting PRD Approval, Awaiting SD, Awaiting SD Approval, Awaiting TP, Awaiting TP Approval, In Progress, Blocked, Awaiting QA, Awaiting UAT, Completed, Superseded, Abandoned. That map is authoritative; this list only mirrors it for readability.
19
+ 13. `Artefacts` link labels must be one of `backlogArtefactLabels`: `ur`, `brownfield`, `prd`, `sd`, `tp`, `qa`, `or` (case-insensitive). Do not invent other labels such as a raw artefact filename.
20
+ 14. After writing or updating this file, run `doctor --json` (or the locally available equivalent) and resolve any `AGDF_BACKLOG_STATUS_UNKNOWN` or `AGDF_BACKLOG_ARTEFACT_LABEL_UNKNOWN` finding before treating the edit as done.
18
21
 
19
22
  ## Active Backlog
20
23
 
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "schemaVersion": 1,
3
3
  "id": "agdf",
4
- "version": "0.4.6",
4
+ "version": "0.4.8",
5
5
  "displayName": "AI Governance & Delivery Framework",
6
6
  "developerName": "AI-native Governance & Delivery Framework",
7
7
  "description": "Codex-first workflow skills for gated, auditable AI-assisted software delivery.",
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
21
21
  "category": "Productivity",
22
22
  "brandColor": "#14B8A6",
23
23
  "author": {
24
- "name": "AI-native Governance & Delivery Framework",
24
+ "name": "Arndt Gold",
25
25
  "url": "https://agdf.iself.eu"
26
26
  },
27
27
  "codex": {
@@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ It must not introduce a second gate model or override `gate-check`, `delivery-ma
40
40
  - `forbidden_now`: outputs or actions currently forbidden
41
41
  - `blocking_condition`: current blocker or `none`
42
42
  - `missing_approval`: exact missing approval formula or `none`
43
+ - `next_gate_after_approval`: the next user gate or internal step unlocked by the missing approval, or `none`
44
+ - `allowed_after_approval`: concise description of what becomes allowed after the missing approval, or `none`
43
45
  - `evidence`: concrete evidence references currently visible
44
46
  - `next_skill`: next AGDF skill or `none`
45
47
  - `next_step`: the single next permissible process action
@@ -52,6 +54,13 @@ It must not introduce a second gate model or override `gate-check`, `delivery-ma
52
54
 
53
55
  `quality_outlook` must not unlock gates, imply QA pass, or substitute for missing evidence.
54
56
 
57
+ `allowed_now` and `allowed_after_approval` are intentionally different:
58
+
59
+ - `allowed_now` is current authority under the active gate.
60
+ - `allowed_after_approval` is the immediate authority unlocked only after the exact `missing_approval` is supplied.
61
+
62
+ `next_gate_after_approval` and `allowed_after_approval` must be `none` when no approval is missing, when the current step is internal, or when the run is in OR/completed handoff. They must not imply implementation, QA, release, commit, push or PR authority unless the existing gate model already allows that authority.
63
+
55
64
  ## Delivery Path Search
56
65
 
57
66
  Delivery Path Search is an optional read-only planning step for high-impact decisions with several materially different next actions.
@@ -69,7 +78,8 @@ reports and automation. Human-facing Markdown must present the same projection
69
78
  with readable labels such as `Current gate`, `Allowed now`, `Blocked by`,
70
79
  `Next step` and `Quality outlook`; do not expose snake_case keys as the visible
71
80
  Run Status Card. Keep that card compact: show `Status`, `Current gate`,
72
- `Allowed now`, `Blocked by`, `Missing approval`, `Next step` and
81
+ `Allowed now`, `Blocked by`, `Missing approval`, `Next gate after approval`
82
+ and `Allowed after approval` when a missing approval exists, `Next step` and
73
83
  `Quality outlook`. Keep mode, forbidden actions, evidence and next-skill detail
74
84
  in the surrounding control artefact when they are relevant.
75
85
 
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ The CLI reports are validators and JSON evidence, not the primary user experienc
70
70
  15. Missing or incomplete control state must not push setup work back to the user. For a fresh request, draft the current minimal artefact in the response and request the exact approval. Initialize or write `.agdf/control/` only when durable control state is explicitly requested, already live for the repository, or required for a deterministic CLI/CI setup path. Implementation remains forbidden.
71
71
  16. Branch names, uncommitted diffs, generated summaries and chat history are not sufficient scope proof when durable artefacts or approvals are missing or conflicting.
72
72
  17. If multiple active scopes are plausible, list the evidenced competing lines and keep the current step at scope clarification or the earliest common safe gate.
73
- 18. When maintaining `MASTER_BACKLOG.md`, use its canonical compact columns, readable status labels and document-relative Markdown links. Do not expose raw long paths or internal snake_case statuses in the human-facing table.
73
+ 18. When maintaining `MASTER_BACKLOG.md`, use its canonical compact columns, readable status labels and document-relative Markdown links. Do not expose raw long paths or internal snake_case statuses in the human-facing table. The canonical status/artefact label vocabulary is defined in the AGDF control scaffold's `MASTER_BACKLOG.md` template Rules section; do not invent other labels.
74
74
  19. Preserve legacy backlog compatibility through the CLI parser; do not create a second surface-specific backlog format.
75
75
 
76
76
  ## Gate Evaluation
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ Use the Runtime Contract definition of `Relevant Run` to decide whether OR is ma
46
46
  12. Keep machine status normalization in the CLI; do not write internal snake_case status values into the human-facing backlog.
47
47
  13. Reconcile Context Graph impact before clean closeout: report `context_graph_reconciliation: resolved | not_applicable | open_gap`.
48
48
  14. If Context Graph work remains unresolved, report it as an explicit open gap and do not describe the run as cleanly handoff-ready.
49
+ 15. After writing or updating `MASTER_BACKLOG.md`, run `doctor --json` (or the locally available equivalent) and resolve any `AGDF_BACKLOG_STATUS_UNKNOWN` or `AGDF_BACKLOG_ARTEFACT_LABEL_UNKNOWN` finding before closeout. See the AGDF control scaffold's `MASTER_BACKLOG.md` template Rules section for the canonical status/artefact label vocabulary.
49
50
 
50
51
  ## When To Use
51
52
  - at the end of every relevant run
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
1
+ import { execFileSync } from "node:child_process";
2
+ import { evaluatorOutputSchema, validateEvaluation } from "../contracts.js";
3
+
4
+ export function claudeEvaluator(options = {}) {
5
+ const claudeBin = options.claudeBin ?? "claude";
6
+ let runtime = "claude version unavailable";
7
+ try {
8
+ runtime = execFileSync(claudeBin, ["--version"], { encoding: "utf8", stdio: ["ignore", "pipe", "ignore"] }).trim();
9
+ } catch {}
10
+
11
+ function gitState() {
12
+ try {
13
+ return execFileSync("git", ["status", "--porcelain=v1", "-z"], {
14
+ cwd: options.cwd,
15
+ encoding: "utf8",
16
+ stdio: ["ignore", "pipe", "ignore"],
17
+ });
18
+ } catch {
19
+ return null;
20
+ }
21
+ }
22
+
23
+ return {
24
+ name: "claude",
25
+ metadata: { name: "claude", runtime, model: options.model ?? "configured-default" },
26
+ async evaluate(input, candidate) {
27
+ const prompt = [
28
+ "You are an evaluation-only component. Do not use tools, execute commands, or modify files.",
29
+ `Return JSON matching contract version ${input.contract_version}.`,
30
+ `Objective: ${input.objective}`,
31
+ `Current gate: ${input.current_gate}`,
32
+ `Candidate id: ${candidate.id}`,
33
+ `Candidate action: ${candidate.action}`,
34
+ "Score scope_fit, gate_readiness, risk_reduction, evidence_gain, testability, reversibility and cost from 0 to 5.",
35
+ "Cost 0 is low and 5 is high. uncertainty is 0 low to 5 high.",
36
+ "Keep rationale concise. child_actions must only contain actions permitted by the current gate.",
37
+ ].join("\n");
38
+ const args = [
39
+ "-p", "--disallowedTools", "Edit,Write,Bash",
40
+ "--output-format", "json", "--json-schema", JSON.stringify(evaluatorOutputSchema()),
41
+ ];
42
+ if (options.model) args.push("--model", options.model);
43
+ args.push(prompt);
44
+ const before = gitState();
45
+ const raw = execFileSync(claudeBin, args, {
46
+ cwd: options.cwd,
47
+ encoding: "utf8",
48
+ stdio: ["ignore", "pipe", "pipe"],
49
+ timeout: options.timeoutMs ?? 120000,
50
+ });
51
+ const after = gitState();
52
+ if (before !== null && after !== before) throw new Error("repository mutation detected during read-only evaluator run");
53
+ const response = JSON.parse(raw);
54
+ if (response.is_error) throw new Error(`claude evaluator returned an error: ${response.result ?? "unknown error"}`);
55
+ return validateEvaluation(JSON.parse(response.result), candidate.id);
56
+ },
57
+ };
58
+ }
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ import { validateEnforcement } from "../contracts.js";
3
3
  export function enforcementForSurface(surface, evidence = []) {
4
4
  const defaults = {
5
5
  codex: { level: "tool_enforced", evidence: ["codex exec --sandbox read-only --ephemeral"] },
6
- claude: { level: "instruction_only", evidence: [] },
6
+ claude: { level: "tool_enforced", evidence: ["claude -p --disallowedTools Edit,Write,Bash"] },
7
7
  copilot: { level: "instruction_only", evidence: [] },
8
8
  opencode: { level: "instruction_only", evidence: [] },
9
9
  generic: { level: "instruction_only", evidence: [] },
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "create-agdf",
3
- "version": "0.4.6",
3
+ "version": "0.4.8",
4
4
  "description": "Bootstrap AGDF repository-local plugin files, Copilot/OpenCode instructions, skills, control files and machine-readable checks.",
5
5
  "type": "module",
6
6
  "files": [
@@ -22,8 +22,9 @@
22
22
  "scripts": {
23
23
  "sync-package-assets": "node ./scripts/sync-package-assets.js",
24
24
  "test:delivery-path-search": "node ./scripts/delivery-path-search-test.js",
25
+ "test:delivery-path-search-unit": "node ./scripts/delivery-path-search-unit-test.js",
25
26
  "test:routing": "npm run sync-package-assets && node ./scripts/test-routing.js",
26
- "smoke-test": "npm run sync-package-assets && npm run test:delivery-path-search && node ./scripts/smoke-test.js && node ./scripts/test-routing.js",
27
+ "smoke-test": "npm run sync-package-assets && npm run test:delivery-path-search && npm run test:delivery-path-search-unit && node ./scripts/smoke-test.js && node ./scripts/test-routing.js",
27
28
  "prepack": "npm run sync-package-assets"
28
29
  },
29
30
  "keywords": [