create-agdf 0.4.5 → 0.4.7
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/bin/create-agdf.js +46 -0
- package/generated/.github/skills/agdf-runtime-contract.md +11 -1
- package/generated/.opencode/agdf-runtime-contract.md +11 -1
- package/generated/plugins/agdf/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/generated/plugins/agdf/meta/agdf-plugin.definition.json +1 -1
- package/generated/plugins/agdf/meta/agdf-runtime-contract.md +11 -1
- package/package.json +1 -1
package/bin/create-agdf.js
CHANGED
|
@@ -1723,6 +1723,40 @@ function deriveQualityOutlook(runState, findings = []) {
|
|
|
1723
1723
|
return "No additional quality follow-up identified from the current control state.";
|
|
1724
1724
|
}
|
|
1725
1725
|
|
|
1726
|
+
function postApprovalTransition(missingApproval) {
|
|
1727
|
+
const transitions = new Map([
|
|
1728
|
+
["Approval: UR", {
|
|
1729
|
+
next_gate_after_approval: "Brownfield Review",
|
|
1730
|
+
allowed_after_approval: "Run Brownfield Review and record Mode/Slice Decision before PRD or implementation.",
|
|
1731
|
+
}],
|
|
1732
|
+
["Approval: PRD", {
|
|
1733
|
+
next_gate_after_approval: "SD",
|
|
1734
|
+
allowed_after_approval: "Draft Solution Design; implementation remains forbidden.",
|
|
1735
|
+
}],
|
|
1736
|
+
["Approval: SD", {
|
|
1737
|
+
next_gate_after_approval: "TP",
|
|
1738
|
+
allowed_after_approval: "Draft Task/Test Plan; implementation remains forbidden.",
|
|
1739
|
+
}],
|
|
1740
|
+
["Approval: TP", {
|
|
1741
|
+
next_gate_after_approval: "Brownfield Analysis",
|
|
1742
|
+
allowed_after_approval: "Run implementation-prep Brownfield Analysis before CD+Tests.",
|
|
1743
|
+
}],
|
|
1744
|
+
["Approval: QA", {
|
|
1745
|
+
next_gate_after_approval: "UAT",
|
|
1746
|
+
allowed_after_approval: "Request UAT when QA has passed; release remains gated.",
|
|
1747
|
+
}],
|
|
1748
|
+
["Approval: UAT", {
|
|
1749
|
+
next_gate_after_approval: "OR",
|
|
1750
|
+
allowed_after_approval: "Produce OR or delivery closeout; VCS and release actions still require explicit instruction.",
|
|
1751
|
+
}],
|
|
1752
|
+
]);
|
|
1753
|
+
|
|
1754
|
+
return transitions.get(missingApproval) ?? {
|
|
1755
|
+
next_gate_after_approval: "none",
|
|
1756
|
+
allowed_after_approval: "none",
|
|
1757
|
+
};
|
|
1758
|
+
}
|
|
1759
|
+
|
|
1726
1760
|
function buildStatusCard({
|
|
1727
1761
|
status,
|
|
1728
1762
|
currentGate,
|
|
@@ -1735,6 +1769,7 @@ function buildStatusCard({
|
|
|
1735
1769
|
findings = [],
|
|
1736
1770
|
}) {
|
|
1737
1771
|
const qualityOutlook = deriveQualityOutlook(runState, findings);
|
|
1772
|
+
const postApproval = postApprovalTransition(missingApproval);
|
|
1738
1773
|
return {
|
|
1739
1774
|
mode: extractField(runState.content ?? "", "mode") || "unknown",
|
|
1740
1775
|
status,
|
|
@@ -1744,6 +1779,8 @@ function buildStatusCard({
|
|
|
1744
1779
|
forbidden_now: forbidden,
|
|
1745
1780
|
blocking_condition: blockingReason || "none",
|
|
1746
1781
|
missing_approval: missingApproval || "none",
|
|
1782
|
+
next_gate_after_approval: postApproval.next_gate_after_approval,
|
|
1783
|
+
allowed_after_approval: postApproval.allowed_after_approval,
|
|
1747
1784
|
evidence: runState.evidence_refs,
|
|
1748
1785
|
next_skill: nextSkillByGate[currentGate] ?? "gate-check",
|
|
1749
1786
|
next_step: nextAllowedAction,
|
|
@@ -1987,12 +2024,16 @@ function evaluateGateCheck(targetDir) {
|
|
|
1987
2024
|
: doctorRevise.next_step;
|
|
1988
2025
|
}
|
|
1989
2026
|
|
|
2027
|
+
const postApproval = postApprovalTransition(missingApproval);
|
|
2028
|
+
|
|
1990
2029
|
return {
|
|
1991
2030
|
schema_version: "1",
|
|
1992
2031
|
status,
|
|
1993
2032
|
current_gate: currentGate,
|
|
1994
2033
|
blocking_reason: blockingReason,
|
|
1995
2034
|
missing_approval: missingApproval,
|
|
2035
|
+
next_gate_after_approval: postApproval.next_gate_after_approval,
|
|
2036
|
+
allowed_after_approval: postApproval.allowed_after_approval,
|
|
1996
2037
|
allowed,
|
|
1997
2038
|
forbidden,
|
|
1998
2039
|
next_allowed_action: nextAllowedAction,
|
|
@@ -2029,6 +2070,8 @@ function printGateCheckStatusCard(report) {
|
|
|
2029
2070
|
console.log(`Current gate: ${card.current_gate}`);
|
|
2030
2071
|
console.log(`Blocked by: ${card.blocking_condition}`);
|
|
2031
2072
|
console.log(`Missing approval: ${card.missing_approval}`);
|
|
2073
|
+
if (card.next_gate_after_approval !== "none") console.log(`Next gate after approval: ${card.next_gate_after_approval}`);
|
|
2074
|
+
if (card.allowed_after_approval !== "none") console.log(`Allowed after approval: ${card.allowed_after_approval}`);
|
|
2032
2075
|
console.log(`Next skill: ${card.next_skill}`);
|
|
2033
2076
|
console.log(`Next step: ${card.next_step}`);
|
|
2034
2077
|
console.log(`Quality outlook: ${card.quality_outlook}`);
|
|
@@ -2087,6 +2130,7 @@ function evaluateDeliveryMap(targetDir) {
|
|
|
2087
2130
|
|
|
2088
2131
|
const qualityOutlook = deriveQualityOutlook(runState, map.findings);
|
|
2089
2132
|
const nextAllowedAction = isPlaceholderValue(runState.next_allowed_action) ? gateDecision.next_allowed_action : runState.next_allowed_action;
|
|
2133
|
+
const postApproval = postApprovalTransition(gateDecision.missing_approval);
|
|
2090
2134
|
|
|
2091
2135
|
return {
|
|
2092
2136
|
schema_version: "1",
|
|
@@ -2095,6 +2139,8 @@ function evaluateDeliveryMap(targetDir) {
|
|
|
2095
2139
|
target_dir: targetDir,
|
|
2096
2140
|
current_gate: currentGate,
|
|
2097
2141
|
next_allowed_action: nextAllowedAction,
|
|
2142
|
+
next_gate_after_approval: postApproval.next_gate_after_approval,
|
|
2143
|
+
allowed_after_approval: postApproval.allowed_after_approval,
|
|
2098
2144
|
quality_outlook: qualityOutlook,
|
|
2099
2145
|
status_card: buildStatusCard({
|
|
2100
2146
|
status,
|
|
@@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ It must not introduce a second gate model or override `agdf-gate-check`, `delive
|
|
|
40
40
|
- `forbidden_now`: outputs or actions currently forbidden
|
|
41
41
|
- `blocking_condition`: current blocker or `none`
|
|
42
42
|
- `missing_approval`: exact missing approval formula or `none`
|
|
43
|
+
- `next_gate_after_approval`: the next user gate or internal step unlocked by the missing approval, or `none`
|
|
44
|
+
- `allowed_after_approval`: concise description of what becomes allowed after the missing approval, or `none`
|
|
43
45
|
- `evidence`: concrete evidence references currently visible
|
|
44
46
|
- `next_skill`: next AGDF skill or `none`
|
|
45
47
|
- `next_step`: the single next permissible process action
|
|
@@ -52,6 +54,13 @@ It must not introduce a second gate model or override `agdf-gate-check`, `delive
|
|
|
52
54
|
|
|
53
55
|
`quality_outlook` must not unlock gates, imply QA pass, or substitute for missing evidence.
|
|
54
56
|
|
|
57
|
+
`allowed_now` and `allowed_after_approval` are intentionally different:
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
- `allowed_now` is current authority under the active gate.
|
|
60
|
+
- `allowed_after_approval` is the immediate authority unlocked only after the exact `missing_approval` is supplied.
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
`next_gate_after_approval` and `allowed_after_approval` must be `none` when no approval is missing, when the current step is internal, or when the run is in OR/completed handoff. They must not imply implementation, QA, release, commit, push or PR authority unless the existing gate model already allows that authority.
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
55
64
|
## Delivery Path Search
|
|
56
65
|
|
|
57
66
|
Delivery Path Search is an optional read-only planning step for high-impact decisions with several materially different next actions.
|
|
@@ -69,7 +78,8 @@ reports and automation. Human-facing Markdown must present the same projection
|
|
|
69
78
|
with readable labels such as `Current gate`, `Allowed now`, `Blocked by`,
|
|
70
79
|
`Next step` and `Quality outlook`; do not expose snake_case keys as the visible
|
|
71
80
|
Run Status Card. Keep that card compact: show `Status`, `Current gate`,
|
|
72
|
-
`Allowed now`, `Blocked by`, `Missing approval`, `Next
|
|
81
|
+
`Allowed now`, `Blocked by`, `Missing approval`, `Next gate after approval`
|
|
82
|
+
and `Allowed after approval` when a missing approval exists, `Next step` and
|
|
73
83
|
`Quality outlook`. Keep mode, forbidden actions, evidence and next-skill detail
|
|
74
84
|
in the surrounding control artefact when they are relevant.
|
|
75
85
|
|
|
@@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ It must not introduce a second gate model or override `agdf-gate-check`, `delive
|
|
|
40
40
|
- `forbidden_now`: outputs or actions currently forbidden
|
|
41
41
|
- `blocking_condition`: current blocker or `none`
|
|
42
42
|
- `missing_approval`: exact missing approval formula or `none`
|
|
43
|
+
- `next_gate_after_approval`: the next user gate or internal step unlocked by the missing approval, or `none`
|
|
44
|
+
- `allowed_after_approval`: concise description of what becomes allowed after the missing approval, or `none`
|
|
43
45
|
- `evidence`: concrete evidence references currently visible
|
|
44
46
|
- `next_skill`: next AGDF skill or `none`
|
|
45
47
|
- `next_step`: the single next permissible process action
|
|
@@ -52,6 +54,13 @@ It must not introduce a second gate model or override `agdf-gate-check`, `delive
|
|
|
52
54
|
|
|
53
55
|
`quality_outlook` must not unlock gates, imply QA pass, or substitute for missing evidence.
|
|
54
56
|
|
|
57
|
+
`allowed_now` and `allowed_after_approval` are intentionally different:
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
- `allowed_now` is current authority under the active gate.
|
|
60
|
+
- `allowed_after_approval` is the immediate authority unlocked only after the exact `missing_approval` is supplied.
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
`next_gate_after_approval` and `allowed_after_approval` must be `none` when no approval is missing, when the current step is internal, or when the run is in OR/completed handoff. They must not imply implementation, QA, release, commit, push or PR authority unless the existing gate model already allows that authority.
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
55
64
|
## Delivery Path Search
|
|
56
65
|
|
|
57
66
|
Delivery Path Search is an optional read-only planning step for high-impact decisions with several materially different next actions.
|
|
@@ -69,7 +78,8 @@ reports and automation. Human-facing Markdown must present the same projection
|
|
|
69
78
|
with readable labels such as `Current gate`, `Allowed now`, `Blocked by`,
|
|
70
79
|
`Next step` and `Quality outlook`; do not expose snake_case keys as the visible
|
|
71
80
|
Run Status Card. Keep that card compact: show `Status`, `Current gate`,
|
|
72
|
-
`Allowed now`, `Blocked by`, `Missing approval`, `Next
|
|
81
|
+
`Allowed now`, `Blocked by`, `Missing approval`, `Next gate after approval`
|
|
82
|
+
and `Allowed after approval` when a missing approval exists, `Next step` and
|
|
73
83
|
`Quality outlook`. Keep mode, forbidden actions, evidence and next-skill detail
|
|
74
84
|
in the surrounding control artefact when they are relevant.
|
|
75
85
|
|
|
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"schemaVersion": 1,
|
|
3
3
|
"id": "agdf",
|
|
4
|
-
"version": "0.4.
|
|
4
|
+
"version": "0.4.7",
|
|
5
5
|
"displayName": "AI Governance & Delivery Framework",
|
|
6
6
|
"developerName": "AI-native Governance & Delivery Framework",
|
|
7
7
|
"description": "Codex-first workflow skills for gated, auditable AI-assisted software delivery.",
|
|
@@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ It must not introduce a second gate model or override `gate-check`, `delivery-ma
|
|
|
40
40
|
- `forbidden_now`: outputs or actions currently forbidden
|
|
41
41
|
- `blocking_condition`: current blocker or `none`
|
|
42
42
|
- `missing_approval`: exact missing approval formula or `none`
|
|
43
|
+
- `next_gate_after_approval`: the next user gate or internal step unlocked by the missing approval, or `none`
|
|
44
|
+
- `allowed_after_approval`: concise description of what becomes allowed after the missing approval, or `none`
|
|
43
45
|
- `evidence`: concrete evidence references currently visible
|
|
44
46
|
- `next_skill`: next AGDF skill or `none`
|
|
45
47
|
- `next_step`: the single next permissible process action
|
|
@@ -52,6 +54,13 @@ It must not introduce a second gate model or override `gate-check`, `delivery-ma
|
|
|
52
54
|
|
|
53
55
|
`quality_outlook` must not unlock gates, imply QA pass, or substitute for missing evidence.
|
|
54
56
|
|
|
57
|
+
`allowed_now` and `allowed_after_approval` are intentionally different:
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
- `allowed_now` is current authority under the active gate.
|
|
60
|
+
- `allowed_after_approval` is the immediate authority unlocked only after the exact `missing_approval` is supplied.
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
`next_gate_after_approval` and `allowed_after_approval` must be `none` when no approval is missing, when the current step is internal, or when the run is in OR/completed handoff. They must not imply implementation, QA, release, commit, push or PR authority unless the existing gate model already allows that authority.
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
55
64
|
## Delivery Path Search
|
|
56
65
|
|
|
57
66
|
Delivery Path Search is an optional read-only planning step for high-impact decisions with several materially different next actions.
|
|
@@ -69,7 +78,8 @@ reports and automation. Human-facing Markdown must present the same projection
|
|
|
69
78
|
with readable labels such as `Current gate`, `Allowed now`, `Blocked by`,
|
|
70
79
|
`Next step` and `Quality outlook`; do not expose snake_case keys as the visible
|
|
71
80
|
Run Status Card. Keep that card compact: show `Status`, `Current gate`,
|
|
72
|
-
`Allowed now`, `Blocked by`, `Missing approval`, `Next
|
|
81
|
+
`Allowed now`, `Blocked by`, `Missing approval`, `Next gate after approval`
|
|
82
|
+
and `Allowed after approval` when a missing approval exists, `Next step` and
|
|
73
83
|
`Quality outlook`. Keep mode, forbidden actions, evidence and next-skill detail
|
|
74
84
|
in the surrounding control artefact when they are relevant.
|
|
75
85
|
|
package/package.json
CHANGED