create-agdf 0.30.0 → 0.31.0

package/generated/submissions/openai/agdf/meta/contracts/sd-definition.md

@@ -33,6 +33,22 @@ PRD criterion exactly once to realization, authoritative owner, stable SDD IDs o
 and compatibility/risk. Never duplicate acceptance, invent scope/users or claim implementation.
 Retain actual sources/draft and a reasoned derivation review; structure alone is not semantic proof.
 
+Architecture Decisions use `SDD-...: decision; rationale: reason; consequence: trade-off`.
+Each bullet has one concrete decision statement, exactly one nonempty `rationale:` field and
+exactly one nonempty `consequence:` field (`trade-off:` is its alias, not an additional field).
+The readiness check distinguishes absent decision/rationale/consequence fields from unresolved
+author prompts and identifies the exact offending token and field. Quoted CLI syntax such as
+`done <id>` stays literal. An inline, parseable JSON object/array introduced immediately by
+`schema`, `JSON schema`, `schema example` or `JSON example` may use full quoted string values
+`"<uuid>"`, `"<string>"`, `"<non-empty string>"`, `"<number>"`, `"<integer>"`,
+`"<positive number>"`, `"<non-negative number>"`, `"<positive integer>"`,
+`"<non-negative integer>"`, `"<boolean>"`, `"<null>"`, `"<object>"` or `"<array>"`.
+This exception applies only to the decision clause, not type placeholders in JSON keys, arbitrary
+inline code, malformed JSON, or the rationale/consequence. Regular JSON keys such as `"todo"`
+are literal schema property names; angle-bracket prompts in keys remain unresolved.
+Unknown prompts such as `<choose encoding>`,
+`<why>`, `TBD` and `TODO` remain blockers; type notation cannot settle a material design choice.
+
 A decision that selects or changes a framework, library, external API, protocol, service or major
 version not already evidenced in the repository needs current authoritative sources through the
 host's available tools: official documentation/specification, release notes or migration guide of
@@ -60,8 +76,38 @@ A product-scope/acceptance conflict stays unresolved and returns to the earliest
 UR/PRD revision owner. Do not edit approved sources, invent a transition after downstream linking
 or manufacture answers; use supported revision/recovery and fresh source approval where required.
 
+### Realize brand-informed criteria
+
+For applicable design work, read the adopted PRD criteria together with the exact project brand
+source references retained by UX/PRD: path, version or content digest and relevant passages. Keep
+that source identity in the existing Ownership And Source Of Truth and Constraints And Compatibility
+sections and confirm the consumed version matches it. A framework example or another project's
+brand file cannot replace the selected source; brand context cannot silently expand approved
+product intent or acceptance.
+
+SD owns the concrete realization: design tokens, typography, layout, information hierarchy and
+controls. Record the relevant choices, reuse, rationale and trade-offs with the existing SDD IDs
+and map each approved criterion once through Acceptance Traceability. Preserve the approved
+perception and information priorities rather than inventing a parallel brand specification.
+
+In Test And Evidence Strategy, identify representative states, observable checks and the evidence
+needed to judge those criteria. Plan evidence for quality.md's UX Intent Fidelity matrix under the
+same PRD criterion IDs; its existing review owner produces that matrix at the appropriate stage.
+Add no second matrix, gate or automatic fidelity claim. A preview or source-file match is not
+implementation evidence or independent human acceptance. Non-applicable work requires no new brand
+file. Missing material design facts remain before_sd decisions below;
+product conflicts return to the existing PRD/UR revision owner.
+
 ## Explicit revision and recording
 
+A returned bound authoring continuation for an incomplete own unapproved draft already
+selects its correction route. Consume its authoring-inputs/material_call/recording_calls
+forms directly and use the supplied update_draft value. Do not dispatch this author again
+or add another intake for that same snapshot. The *_action revise route below is only for
+NEW editing intent on an already READY draft, and uses skill_id gate-check, never an author
+skill ID or a host skill alias. After saving, follow the returned continuation once.
+
+
 Before recording, use the continuation's resolved language and summary fields with
 gate-artifact-preparation's Language and approval summary preparation. A translated summary
 must be part of the draft before presentation, not deferred until a renderer failure.

package/generated/submissions/openai/agdf/meta/contracts/tp-definition.md

@@ -69,6 +69,14 @@ not independent proof of human provenance. Table headings may use levels two thr
 
 ## Recording and revision
 
+A returned bound authoring continuation for an incomplete own unapproved draft already
+selects its correction route. Consume its authoring-inputs/material_call/recording_calls
+forms directly and use the supplied update_draft value. Do not dispatch this author again
+or add another intake for that same snapshot. The *_action revise route below is only for
+NEW editing intent on an already READY draft, and uses skill_id gate-check, never an author
+skill ID or a host skill alias. After saving, follow the returned continuation once.
+
+
 A ready draft without new editing intent is presented unchanged. Explicit ready-draft revision uses
 gate-check intake true, intake_mode resume, exact run_id/expected_revision_id and tp_action revise
 (CLI --tp-action revise), exclusive of other source actions and continue_delivery. Approved changes

package/generated/submissions/openai/agdf/meta/contracts/ur-definition.md

@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ For `phase: ur_definition`, use only the returned governance_target, run_id, rev
 template_path is the absolute, version-matched template owned by the installed plugin runtime.
 Repository copies under `.agdf/control/templates/` are derived scaffold references and never
 override this authoring source. Read the template without rewriting it; persist only artifact_path.
-A direct invocation first dispatches ur-definition; without a bound run follow the existing
+An already returned bound `ur_definition` continuation satisfies entry: consume its authoring inputs and writer forms directly. Do not repeat author dispatch or intake for that same snapshot. A direct invocation without such a continuation first dispatches ur-definition; without a bound run follow the existing
 resolve_delivery_run assignment, then gate-check intake/resume with its expected_revision_id.
 Never use AGDF_RUN_ID, cwd, discovery or a previous approval as authority. Missing, stale,
 foreign, invalid or approved bindings require fresh control routing; do not write.
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ follows its current-request language contract and does not change the artefact l
 
 Before recording a complete draft, when `approval_summary_required` is true, include exactly
 one `## <approval_summary_heading>` section using the supplied heading verbatim. Write a
-complete summary in the resolved presentation language covering problem, goal, affected users,
+complete summary in the resolved presentation language. Read `approval_summary_format.required_fields` from authoring-inputs: those exact list field declarations need concrete authored values; prose or a heading alone is not a named field. Cover problem, goal, affected users,
 scope, non-goals, acceptance signals, source ownership, risks/unknowns and next step.
 Do not truncate decision-relevant content or use ellipses. The existing approval renderer's
 limits and validation apply. This summary is editorial; the UR remains authoritative.
@@ -116,9 +116,13 @@ is required merely to complete an unapproved incomplete draft.
 
 A new draft is recorded through existing run-step --step ur --title <short title>, using
 --dir <governance_target> --run <run_id> --revision <revision_id>.
-For an already registered unapproved draft, require explicit user revision intent. Resume
-through gate-check with intake true, intake_mode resume, run_id, expected_revision_id and
-ur_action revise (CLI --ur-action revise). Ordinary intake of a ready draft still presents it.
+When this bound continuation returns a registered, incomplete unapproved draft, correct its
+readiness gaps directly through the supplied `ur_draft.replace` form. The existing authoring
+route already covers completing that same need; do not open another intake or dispatch.
+A deliberate change to an already READY registered draft outside that continuation still
+requires explicit user revision intent: enter via gate-check with intake true, intake_mode
+resume, run_id, expected_revision_id and ur_action revise (CLI --ur-action revise).
+Ordinary intake of a ready draft still presents it. Never substitute a field named revision.
 Stage the replacement and use ur_draft.replace with the current binding. The writer
 publishes the document and typed evidence atomically. Never edit bound bytes, reseal
 an unknown change or alter an approved UR or its approval.

package/generated/submissions/openai/agdf/meta/copilot-payload-baseline.json

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 {
   "schema_version": 1,
   "profile_id": "copilot-runtime-plugin",
-  "max_files": 453,
-  "max_bytes": 4717872,
-  "rationale": "PR #50 integration follow-up: fresh canonical initialization seeds no shared Backlog in either layout; historical v4 material recovery has an explicit legacy fixture. Exact generated Copilot closure: 453 files / 4717872 bytes (-112 from 7aff94dc), no reserve; time, schema and safety limits unchanged."
+  "max_files": 457,
+  "max_bytes": 4791833,
+  "rationale": "AGDF 0.31.0 adds 257 bytes for the required release catalogue entry. Exact generated payload with no reserve."
 }

package/generated/submissions/openai/agdf/meta/distribution-profile-history.json

@@ -155,6 +155,13 @@
       "profile_id": "runtime-plugin",
       "entry_digest": "05a4645b92ab7f33c40ae676f7e92c95f618b86e3fc031684cfbac8bf6b21ce6",
       "status": "supported"
+    },
+    "0.31.0": {
+      "contract_id": "five-profile-v1",
+      "provenance_schema_version": 1,
+      "profile_id": "runtime-plugin",
+      "entry_digest": "d3a3b0a1fc9e3312cb8a9437a4acf8ba99a563b2dab665b38feec8e2257e4f23",
+      "status": "supported"
     }
   }
 }

package/generated/submissions/openai/agdf/plugin.json

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 {
   "$schema": "https://agent-plugins.org/schemas/1.0.0/plugin.schema.json",
   "name": "agdf",
-  "version": "0.30.0",
+  "version": "0.31.0",
   "description": "Control layer for governed AI-assisted delivery.",
   "author": {
     "name": "Arndt Gold",

package/generated/submissions/openai/agdf/skills/ux-intent-definition/SKILL.md

@@ -63,12 +63,14 @@ and approved as PRD content. Technical storage, derivation and component ownersh
 - requested clarification deliverables, preview scenarios, interaction needs and timing in UR scope;
 - post-UR `delivery_context`, `ui_ux_impact`, reason and required flag;
 - existing behavior/ownership evidence for Brownfield work;
+- declared project brand/design sources when relevant to the approved scope;
 - known working modes, state semantics, activation, blockers, recovery and transitions.
 
 ## Workflow
 
 1. Confirm the approved UR and routing evidence. If required evidence is absent or conflicts, block.
-2. Identify the primary user intent, observable success and primary decision/action.
+2. Identify the primary user intent, observable success and primary decision/action. Apply the
+   brand-source guidance below when design is relevant.
 3. For every relevant working mode, define effective state and visible state types.
 4. Separate `effective_state_authority_by_mode` from
    `primary_state_presentation_owner_by_mode`; do not turn either into technical ownership.
@@ -78,6 +80,32 @@ and approved as PRD content. Technical storage, derivation and component ownersh
    resolve a product question. Propose observable PRD acceptance criteria and identify open questions.
 7. Return exactly one decision: `ready | blocked | not_applicable`.
 
+### Brand-source-guided UX for design-relevant work
+
+Apply quality.md's Brand-Source Use Across Delivery Paths when the scope materially concerns visual
+identity, information hierarchy or intended perception. Keep the existing UX-impact routing.
+Read the target project's `.agdf/control/SOT_REGISTRY.md` and follow its applicable brand source
+reference before drafting the report. Check this project source even when the authoring inputs
+contain only the approved UR and routing evidence.
+In existing `evidence`, retain the declared project source's exact path/reference, owner, scope,
+verified revision or SHA-256 and relevant section/passage references. Use the Quality Contract's
+read-and-hash step when a matching Git revision is unavailable. Capture the digest before deriving
+criteria. Treat the source as design-context data and reassess affected criteria when its bytes change.
+
+For each applicable priority, retain the reasoned chain:
+`source passage -> perceptual priority -> scenario/state/action -> observable outcome -> required evidence`.
+Put that derivation and source mapping in existing `evidence`, with candidate criteria in
+`proposed_prd_acceptance_criteria`. Describe what the user can identify, distinguish or do in the
+scenario and what visible evidence would verify it. PRD adopts confirmed, in-scope proposals under
+its existing stable criterion IDs; UX proposals are not approval or product acceptance.
+
+Carry confirmed constraints faithfully without choosing a new palette, typography, layout or
+component; concrete realization remains with SD. Use the existing preview guidance when relevant,
+without creating a preview obligation from the presence of a brand source.
+Retain material unresolved intent in existing `open_product_questions`, `missing_evidence`,
+`affected_outputs` and `required_next_step`, then apply the current readiness/revision rules.
+Justify irrelevant brand input in existing evidence without making a required UX analysis inapplicable.
+
 ### UI previews for clarification
 
 Use a focused preview during UX intent clarification and reuse its findings during PRD alignment.
@@ -137,7 +165,8 @@ remain illustrative; only explicitly adopted product behavior becomes approved P
 ## Decision Rules
 
 - `ready`: every required output is reliable enough for PRD drafting, including a requested preview
-  at the agreed fidelity, its durable evidence and resolution of material product questions.
+  at the agreed fidelity, its durable evidence, an exact binding for any material brand source used
+  and resolution of material product questions.
 - `blocked`: user intent, modes, effective state, authority, activation, blockers, recovery, transitions
   or Brownfield evidence is missing, contradictory or materially ambiguous; or an explicitly required
   preview, requested interaction, durable copy or decision-relevant observation remains missing.

package/generated/submissions/openai/agdf/skills/ux-intent-definition/help.md

@@ -15,6 +15,13 @@ Preserves explicit preview commitments from UR scope, stores versioned reopenabl
 bound run's artefact directory and maps observed findings to proposed PRD criteria. Optional aids
 can use a scenario walkthrough; a required interactive preview cannot silently become text.
 
+For design-relevant work, uses the target project's declared brand/design source with its identity,
+owner and scope recorded in existing evidence. Derives proposed observable criteria from source
+passages and perceptual priorities; file presence or generic quality adjectives are insufficient.
+Material gaps use the existing questions/readiness rules. This adds no gate, output field, universal
+brand-file requirement or technical design authority, and does not change UX-impact routing.
+
 ## SEE ALSO
 
-See SKILL.md for triggers, authority, required fields and decision rules.
+See SKILL.md for triggers, authority, brand-source applicability and provenance, required fields and
+decision rules.

package/generated/submissions/openai/agdf/submission/openai/availability.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Availability Decision Record
 
-- release: `0.30.0`
+- release: `0.31.0`
 - decision_state: `pending`
 - decision_owner: verified publisher
 - countries: not selected

package/generated/submissions/openai/agdf/submission/openai/capability-matrix.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "schemaVersion": 1,
-  "releaseVersion": "0.30.0",
+  "releaseVersion": "0.31.0",
   "evidenceStates": [
     "common",
     "codex-specific",

package/generated/submissions/openai/agdf/submission/openai/inventory.json

@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
 {
   "schemaVersion": 1,
-  "releaseVersion": "0.30.0",
-  "digest": "eb5416763cc7fd4988f584f6a34f73ab9795f69279683cbbc3e7a60a2b0bfd0e",
+  "releaseVersion": "0.31.0",
+  "digest": "27a51e7b9bac01923b09b76ec2a34471ec42477f697518121e070fc366fbf465",
   "files": [
     {
       "path": ".codex-plugin/plugin.json",
-      "sha256": "75f91aef70e6fd96dbaff36ddd61a7f6c09184f5477dacb804d393356cacfcff"
+      "sha256": "3f6ffb624a4923711d72b982fcd846574a049f280b90f03b8e1d9e4fb432d6b9"
     },
     {
       "path": "assets/agdf-icon.svg",
@@ -33,11 +33,11 @@
     },
     {
       "path": "meta/agdf-interaction-locales.json",
-      "sha256": "5f4cef8476c29f1c324b0a55ba1082fd144d1bba121b89e8cdcccbefddf79bc9"
+      "sha256": "c0242a3c93c0d0d67ae290462b012171858daceac48953e41b108af6f34b8e46"
     },
     {
       "path": "meta/agdf-plugin.definition.json",
-      "sha256": "ed7c789417c787128c7dc987fbf99bf81e4390a544f80a447dfe560ee2957cb4"
+      "sha256": "10741f0b5c28d8d4fd2c60dc8e272e7e70e309ee8b46e4e3fbae3bad230e8e80"
     },
     {
       "path": "meta/agdf-runtime-contract.md",
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@
     },
     {
       "path": "meta/contracts/gate-artifact-preparation.md",
-      "sha256": "54aff04d3b12a614d709bdeaf8d50fd8ab4b706a91f6267b00b93871cf01084f"
+      "sha256": "7696ffd52ea048687f1535d8a63ebd561148cd71b4f814f97c90496be903d4db"
     },
     {
       "path": "meta/contracts/gate-transition.md",
@@ -73,27 +73,27 @@
     },
     {
       "path": "meta/contracts/interaction.md",
-      "sha256": "3d789713156f43aeb3c9bea42496ec7c5158c9c9100713b1bfa7b5ad69b5e34c"
+      "sha256": "cc414b56a01a4a329374ba02a2fee4a06a8eca5e49b6bec1c74c430c9384c04e"
     },
     {
       "path": "meta/contracts/modes.md",
-      "sha256": "ac287681ab1981fe94a7fe2dea895089ba6942206275e1b4d5c1bc6dd8bc3f6d"
+      "sha256": "7410cb929cbbcae030b5283beb84f3dfe1d13ad47916b08a05f3a50d6b427f20"
     },
     {
       "path": "meta/contracts/prd-definition.md",
-      "sha256": "0bbbf196a5fe562becfb0a95d3e81caaf500b1943c0946c6a9162a19597d9547"
+      "sha256": "49a3fddc62e010c51dcd962e0db734431afbb869e60a14c7aeb4eb2305f589d6"
     },
     {
       "path": "meta/contracts/quality.md",
-      "sha256": "d32a7204c9737f38d6ce2b7bcda4a1c0873effb88446a96a7bde8ee6d2c7ce42"
+      "sha256": "a650fbb760fea534d0c106fe8e6693cf2f85eaf41d520eb5dcf34454b86d7877"
     },
     {
       "path": "meta/contracts/request-activation.md",
-      "sha256": "5c6b93b908e5fefafeecd4bd66276cab3232632628b94a89f1166c686aeec31d"
+      "sha256": "f8ad8dd549cf7241b162e09e035ff905b6c2ddfb68eaae7925c4ddec66b5493b"
     },
     {
       "path": "meta/contracts/sd-definition.md",
-      "sha256": "9c5b1dde33d09717c6885f0b1af751d25597c72bad60e10b8ba53285933cede2"
+      "sha256": "841b13e6388e1e41bc8d577840e32390ae97528c3c6de3d5a041cd7e7c026fac"
     },
     {
       "path": "meta/contracts/task-target-resolution.md",
@@ -101,19 +101,19 @@
     },
     {
       "path": "meta/contracts/tp-definition.md",
-      "sha256": "a9c2027c92a69de1360a9a138d4a9c8ab43d21b62731972e3032e4d82afaa34b"
+      "sha256": "7c74f00ba02f1fb2628b3c7d85ba63a98425b99b7b7d43007d52e8a20d341d7b"
     },
     {
       "path": "meta/contracts/ur-definition.md",
-      "sha256": "630739faa6f3c3eb7e5db8674173c235297ac4c5e5336d5f2e75e4a41894541c"
+      "sha256": "59d57382db0781e4767ce088345896866f0fd776e224a27c1e2ab3039e6d79d1"
     },
     {
       "path": "meta/copilot-payload-baseline.json",
-      "sha256": "3ede6c7cbb57f3d164a45435ee601c012cf7b7e0da09338e4b93ba8bcc6b3fd2"
+      "sha256": "86abf485b219c8a086e136a05ae2f15f3e4b3fcae6d15299c4ca73b27426e5a5"
     },
     {
       "path": "meta/distribution-profile-history.json",
-      "sha256": "a1ed38d8cf065265f1efbefeb868662725983320819268a23e4ac8987cb73d7e"
+      "sha256": "afd45edbcc28e1d7c1b4108f2efc33c42b62d19a85f685b3335bff35cd7d99e6"
     },
     {
       "path": "meta/schemas/agent-plugins/1.0.0/mcp.schema.json",
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@
     },
     {
       "path": "plugin.json",
-      "sha256": "574eb71ce026eb9eaeb73f3b648de15cd673d2350eaa5615644c2c638c7adaf1"
+      "sha256": "7f2a5feef6d4bd025cddb7a658d960663eaa741a558545bf54e46085bbac7e91"
     },
     {
       "path": "skills/brownfield-analysis/SKILL.md",
@@ -237,31 +237,31 @@
     },
     {
       "path": "skills/ux-intent-definition/SKILL.md",
-      "sha256": "4d91db50427d5044fb80b1b239cff473c38f08472273fa31ebb047c1c4716b72"
+      "sha256": "238491bb1f3116cb161416c4fc5e5e941951b91cdda5a147f02fe3cc620bd18c"
     },
     {
       "path": "skills/ux-intent-definition/help.md",
-      "sha256": "e0e75a15d461dd25fa055979fb5d8767141ee8d8519792dcfeb60b7fbf62c440"
+      "sha256": "35475b403cf8492122572014ad32a2c997db8aa82f3a7214aefc742310064592"
     },
     {
       "path": "submission/openai/availability.md",
-      "sha256": "c058dd74ee2d5359ae058cfc9a76e9e23d0ee40b2e70121805fe1ca3e84f504a"
+      "sha256": "717154e771517287dd58b5ce1c4cdca9f002f14d541b223ca4e6ec851591f2eb"
     },
     {
       "path": "submission/openai/capability-matrix.json",
-      "sha256": "4916aec594e31e1fd6ba45a8d81c6cfba7cb1529639cf7f857716a9ca7da5c68"
+      "sha256": "5475a558ddc87a2529e9c159611011cf46dac8d34b9ab373a2dcd6a436a2273e"
     },
     {
       "path": "submission/openai/listing.json",
-      "sha256": "8d9b966e9be60a61614c0e915aa1a91dad5c6536844bbd2d507424dd0dfdfa18"
+      "sha256": "e1e08c80c437a081e6b4418ce0650c1a938be52051aea5b9b7965f0e7c88ae70"
     },
     {
       "path": "submission/openai/release-notes.md",
-      "sha256": "b32b92495b6bd57e11cad3d565114529ed3734ba6993659740488d6819bdd313"
+      "sha256": "2d0ad25ed562b3629c8177e427a888afeb92eba036c0ff2e3500cd06b9bde4bd"
     },
     {
       "path": "submission/openai/reviewer-cases.json",
-      "sha256": "e0d2a8a25245f5ca963d9f704a3d7c0cf092c9fdeac6cb657deb3a06a546c7d3"
+      "sha256": "aeec3e4f05e4b0193d1a4cdf971bcf59c8a26dd941734373f6cd1a16fe3d20f0"
     }
   ]
 }

package/generated/submissions/openai/agdf/submission/openai/listing.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "schemaVersion": 1,
-  "releaseVersion": "0.30.0",
+  "releaseVersion": "0.31.0",
   "submissionType": "skills",
   "identity": {
     "technicalId": "agdf",

package/generated/submissions/openai/agdf/submission/openai/readiness.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "schemaVersion": 1,
-  "releaseVersion": "0.30.0",
+  "releaseVersion": "0.31.0",
   "candidateState": "repository_ready",
   "submissionReady": false,
   "submissionBlockers": [
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
     },
     "bundle": {
       "state": "pass",
-      "detail": "65 inventoried files; inventory digest eb5416763cc7fd4988f584f6a34f73ab9795f69279683cbbc3e7a60a2b0bfd0e"
+      "detail": "65 inventoried files; inventory digest 27a51e7b9bac01923b09b76ec2a34471ec42477f697518121e070fc366fbf465"
     },
     "installed_host": {
       "state": "unverified",

package/generated/submissions/openai/agdf/submission/openai/readiness.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # AGDF Public Plugin Readiness
 
-- release: `0.30.0`
+- release: `0.31.0`
 - candidate_state: `repository_ready`
 - submission_ready: `false`
 
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 | Class | State | Detail |
 |---|---|---|
 | repository | pass | canonical contract and deterministic source checks |
-| bundle | pass | 65 inventoried files; inventory digest eb5416763cc7fd4988f584f6a34f73ab9795f69279683cbbc3e7a60a2b0bfd0e |
+| bundle | pass | 65 inventoried files; inventory digest 27a51e7b9bac01923b09b76ec2a34471ec42477f697518121e070fc366fbf465 |
 | installed_host | unverified | PPD-L02 and PPD-L03 not performed |
 | portal | unverified | unverified |
 | post_publication | unverified | not published |

package/generated/submissions/openai/agdf/submission/openai/release-notes.md

@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
-# AGDF 0.30.0 — Simplified Project Model, Skills-only Candidate
+# AGDF 0.31.0 — Skills-only Candidate
 
-The full repository release prepares a simpler .agdf model: independent planned URs, one
-Run-folder layout and canonical inventory without a shared Master Backlog. The
-[full 0.30.0 release notes](https://github.com/ArndtGold/ai-native-governance-delivery-framework/blob/main/docs/releases/0.30.0.md)
-explain the changes since 0.20.2, unsupported old layouts and the separate offline archive path.
-Those runtime and project-management capabilities are not bundled into this public Skills-only
-profile. Its shared workflow guidance reflects the current model; no publication or exact-candidate
-native qualification is established by this source record.
+The [full 0.31.0 release notes](https://github.com/ArndtGold/ai-native-governance-delivery-framework/blob/main/docs/releases/0.31.0.md)
+cover Companion Core, brand-guided UX criteria and MCP delivery continuation since 0.30.0.
+The public Skills-only profile provides workflow guidance. When a project supplies an
+authoritative brand source, the design guidance connects it to observable acceptance criteria.
+Companion runtime, MCP continuation and project initialization belong to the runtime-bearing
+distributions. This source record establishes the intended package scope and leaves publication
+and exact-candidate native qualification to their separate checks.
 
 This candidate packages the canonical AGDF workflow skills for public discovery in ChatGPT and
 Codex. It helps users assess delivery fit, preserve explicit human approvals, inspect existing-system

package/generated/submissions/openai/agdf/submission/openai/reviewer-cases.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "schemaVersion": 1,
-  "releaseVersion": "0.30.0",
+  "releaseVersion": "0.31.0",
   "cases": [
     {
       "id": "positive-proportional-fit",

package/lib/cli/command-registry.js

@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ export const commandRegistry = Object.freeze([
   command("opencode-repo", { preferred: [" --dir <path>"], scaffold: [" --dir <path>"] }),
   command("init", { preferred: [" [--operation <original-uuid>]"], scaffold: [""] }),
   command('project-state', { local: [' --dir <absolute-git-root> [--json] [--language <tag>]'] }),
+  command('run-view', { local: [' --dir <absolute-git-root> [--json] [--language <tag>] [--run <run-id>]...'] }),
   command('operation-status', { local: [' --dir <absolute-git-root> --module project.initialize/<original-uuid> [--json] [--language <tag>]'] }),
   command("config", { scaffold: [" --language de"] }),
   command("target-check", { local: [` --json [--language <tag>] [--working-directory <absolute-path>] [--target-source ${TASK_TARGET_SOURCE_GRAMMAR} --primary-target <absolute-path>]`] }),
@@ -72,7 +73,7 @@ export function supportedCommandNames() {
 export function validateCommandOptions(options) {
   if (options.native && (options.target !== 'status' || options.surface !== 'codex' || !options.dirExplicit || !options.dirInputAbsolute))
     throw Error('--native requires status --surface codex --dir <absolute-target>.');
-  if (['project-state', 'operation-status'].includes(options.target)) {
+  if (['project-state', 'operation-status', 'run-view'].includes(options.target)) {
     if (!options.dirExplicit || !options.dirInputAbsolute) throw Error('Project reads require an explicit absolute --dir Git root.');
     if (options.target === 'operation-status' && !/^project\.initialize\/[0-9a-f]{8}(?:-[0-9a-f]{4}){3}-[0-9a-f]{12}$/u.test(options.contractModule ?? ''))
       throw Error('operation-status requires --module project.initialize/<original-uuid>.');

package/lib/cli/parse-args.js

@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ export function parseArgs(argv, dependencies = {}) {
   let generationTimeoutMs = 30000;
   let generationCostUnits = 5;
   let runId;
+  const runIds = [];
   let gate;
   let revisionId;
   let response;
@@ -161,6 +162,7 @@ export function parseArgs(argv, dependencies = {}) {
 
     if (arg === "--run") {
       runId = requiredValue(args, i, arg);
+      runIds.push(runId);
       i += 1;
       continue;
     }
@@ -363,10 +365,10 @@ export function parseArgs(argv, dependencies = {}) {
     throw new CliUsageError("Source revision identity and evidence flags may not repeat");
   }
   if (documentServer !== undefined && target !== 'render-document') throw new CliUsageError('--server requires render-document');
-  if (['project-state', 'operation-status'].includes(target)) {
-    const allowed = new Set(['--dir', '--json', '--language', '--lang', ...(target === 'operation-status' ? ['--module'] : [])]);
-    if ([...flagCounts].some(([flag, count]) => count !== 1 || !allowed.has(flag)))
-      throw new CliUsageError('Project reads accept only unique --dir, --json, --language and operation-status --module selectors.');
+  if (['project-state', 'operation-status', 'run-view'].includes(target)) {
+    const allowed = new Set(['--dir', '--json', '--language', '--lang', ...(target === 'operation-status' ? ['--module'] : []), ...(target === 'run-view' ? ['--run'] : [])]);
+    if ([...flagCounts].some(([flag, count]) => (count !== 1 && flag !== '--run') || !allowed.has(flag)))
+      throw new CliUsageError('Project reads accept only unique --dir, --json, --language, operation-status --module and repeatable run-view --run selectors.');
   }
   if (documentRequest && target !== 'render-document') throw new CliUsageError('--request requires render-document');
   if (target === 'render-document') {
@@ -462,6 +464,7 @@ export function parseArgs(argv, dependencies = {}) {
       model,
       generateCandidates,
       runId,
+      ...(target === 'run-view' ? { runIds } : {}),
       gate,
       revisionId,
       response,

package/lib/cli/project-read-command.js

@@ -1,6 +1,35 @@
 import { createCoreServices } from '#agdf-core';
+import { readRunView } from '#agdf-core/companion/run-view.js';
 import { resources, resolveConfiguredChatLanguage } from '../runtime/control-context.js';
 import { cliGitObservation } from '../control-evaluation/git-observation.js';
+import { RUN_ID_PATTERN } from '#agdf-core/control-state/run-identity.js';
+import { CliUsageError } from './parse-args.js';
+
+// An explicit --language wins; otherwise the configured chat language. A configuration that cannot be
+// resolved (unsupported layout, invalid value) must not hide the store diagnosis (PRD AC-002), so the
+// language is left to Core as executeProjectRead does: an unsupported store is reported in `store`,
+// an invalid configuration as the evaluation error of every evaluated run (CR finding CIR-05; both
+// cases are covered by run-view-command-test.js).
+const readLanguage = options => {
+  if (options.languageExplicit) return options.language?.chat_language;
+  try { return resolveConfiguredChatLanguage(options.dir); } catch { return undefined; }
+};
+
+// Read-only companion run view (SD SDD-001): the status card fields of every active or unreadable
+// run of one project root plus every run named with --run, versioned run-view/1. Writes nothing.
+// Exit 0 for a complete view, 2 when the store is unavailable or has no control folder.
+export function executeRunView(options, io = console) {
+  // A malformed run id is a usage error, never an evaluated run of its own (CR finding C3).
+  const invalid = (options.runIds ?? []).find(runId => !RUN_ID_PATTERN.test(runId));
+  if (invalid !== undefined) throw new CliUsageError(`run-view --run requires a run id (${RUN_ID_PATTERN}); got ${JSON.stringify(invalid)}.`);
+  const view = readRunView(options.dir, { language: readLanguage(options), runIds: options.runIds ?? [] });
+  if (options.json) io.log(JSON.stringify(view, null, 2));
+  else {
+    io.log(`AGDF run-view: ${view.store.status}${view.store.reason ? ` (${view.store.reason})` : ''}`);
+    for (const run of view.runs) io.log(`- ${run.run_id}: ${run.evaluated ? `${run.status} · ${run.current_gate} · ${run.next_step_text}` : run.lifecycle ?? 'unreadable'}`);
+  }
+  return view.store.status === 'ok' ? 0 : 2;
+}
 
 // CLI syntax only. Target confirmation, facts and original-operation semantics
 // stay with the same inspect owner used by MCP.

package/lib/cli/validation-handlers.js

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 import { executeRunAlias } from './run-command-aliases.js';
-import { executeProjectRead } from './project-read-command.js';
+import { executeProjectRead, executeRunView } from './project-read-command.js';
 import { localePack } from '#agdf-core/interaction-presentation.js';
 import { renderCodexDocument } from './codex-document-command.js';
 import { readFileSync, lstatSync, openSync, fstatSync, closeSync, constants } from "node:fs";
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ export function createValidationHandlers(io = console) {
   } }).dispatch;
   return new Map([
     ...['project-state', 'operation-status'].map(name => [name, options => executeProjectRead(options, io)]),
+    ['run-view', options => executeRunView(options, io)],
     ['render-document', options => renderCodexDocument(options)],
     ...['run-create', 'run-present', 'run-approve', 'run-step', 'run-revise', 'run-close'].map(name => [name, options => executeRunAlias(options, io)]),
     ...Object.entries(commandGroupRoutes).map(([route, group]) => [route, options => {