cowork-flow 0.0.14 → 0.0.15

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "cowork-flow",
-  "version": "0.0.14",
+  "version": "0.0.15",
   "description": "CLI for installing and maintaining cowork-flow collaboration templates.",
   "type": "module",
   "bin": {

package/template/.cowork-flow/.version

@@ -1 +1 @@
-0.0.14
+0.0.15

package/template/.cowork-flow/agent-team/agents.yaml

@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ agents:
     risk_limits:
       max_parallel_write_conflicts: 0
     prompt: |
+      Use the assignment brief as the source of truth; do not broaden scope.
       Implement the smallest change that satisfies the approved plan and tests.
       Write or update focused regression tests first, keep edits scoped, and report exact verification commands.
 
@@ -31,6 +32,7 @@ agents:
     risk_limits:
       max_parallel_write_conflicts: 0
     prompt: |
+      Use the assignment brief as the source of truth; do not broaden scope.
       Design tests that fail for the broken behavior and pass for the intended behavior.
       Prefer clear behavior assertions over implementation details, and include the command that proves the result.
 
@@ -47,6 +49,7 @@ agents:
     risk_limits:
       max_parallel_write_conflicts: 0
     prompt: |
+      Use the assignment brief as the source of truth; do not broaden scope.
       Find the root cause before changing code. Reproduce the failure, compare with nearby working patterns,
       then make the smallest fix and verify the original symptom.
 
@@ -62,6 +65,7 @@ agents:
     risk_limits:
       max_parallel_write_conflicts: 0
     prompt: |
+      Use the assignment brief as the source of truth; review only the requested scope.
       Review the proposal, spec, plan, and task PRD for contradictions, missing acceptance criteria,
       unclear scope, and behavior that is not covered by verification.
 
@@ -78,6 +82,7 @@ agents:
     risk_limits:
       max_parallel_write_conflicts: 0
     prompt: |
+      Use the assignment brief as the source of truth; review only the requested scope.
       Review the diff for correctness, maintainability, focused scope, and meaningful tests.
       Check that verification evidence matches the behavior being claimed.
 
@@ -93,6 +98,7 @@ agents:
     risk_limits:
       max_parallel_write_conflicts: 0
     prompt: |
+      Use the assignment brief as the source of truth; do not broaden scope.
       Write concise project documentation that reflects actual commands, files, and workflow behavior.
       Avoid aspirational text that is not backed by the implementation.
 
@@ -109,5 +115,6 @@ agents:
     risk_limits:
       max_parallel_write_conflicts: 0
     prompt: |
+      Use the assignment brief as the source of truth; review only the requested scope.
       Review release-facing changes for versioning, packaging, documentation, and command safety.
       Confirm that generated artifacts and publish steps are intentional.

package/template/.cowork-flow/scripts/common/agent_team.py

@@ -468,28 +468,53 @@ def _render_named_items(title: str, items: object) -> list[str]:
 
 def render_assignment_prompt(assignment: dict[str, object]) -> str:
     agent_type = assignment["agent_type"]
+    assignment_id = assignment["id"]
+    task_title = assignment.get("title", "")
     lines = [
-        f"# {assignment['id']}",
+        f"# {assignment_id}",
         "",
-        f"Role: {assignment['role']}",
-        f"Recommended agent: {assignment['recommended_agent']}",
-        f"Agent type: {agent_type}",
-        f"Spawn target agent type: {agent_type}",
-        f"Task: {assignment.get('title', '')}",
-        "",
-        f"Spawn one {agent_type} agent for this assignment. Use this file as the complete worker prompt.",
+        f"You are implementing assignment {assignment_id}: {task_title}",
         "",
         "You are already the dispatched worker for this assignment.",
         "Do not run the project start-session workflow or try to spawn another worker from this prompt.",
         "Treat this file as the complete worker brief unless you are blocked and need one specific missing fact.",
         "",
+        "## Assignment context",
+        "",
+        f"- Role: {assignment['role']}",
+        f"- Recommended agent: {assignment['recommended_agent']}",
+        f"- Agent type: {agent_type}",
+        f"- Spawn target agent type: {agent_type}",
+        f"- Task: {task_title}",
+        "",
     ]
     agent_prompt = assignment.get("agent_prompt")
     if isinstance(agent_prompt, str) and agent_prompt.strip():
         lines.extend(["## Agent prompt", "", agent_prompt.strip(), ""])
-    lines.append("You are not alone in this codebase. Respect the write boundary, do not revert other agents' edits, and report changed files.")
-    lines.append("")
+    lines.extend(
+        [
+            "## Your job",
+            "",
+            "- Implement exactly this assignment and nothing outside its write boundary.",
+            "- Follow the listed steps and run the listed verification commands when applicable.",
+            "- You are not alone in this codebase. Respect other agents' edits and never revert work you did not make.",
+            "- If the brief is missing a required fact, report NEEDS_CONTEXT with the specific missing fact instead of guessing.",
+            "",
+        ]
+    )
     lines.extend(_render_named_items("Files", assignment.get("files")))
     lines.extend(_render_named_items("Steps", assignment.get("steps")))
     lines.extend(_render_named_items("Commands", assignment.get("commands")))
+    lines.extend(
+        [
+            "## Report format",
+            "",
+            "- Status: DONE | DONE_WITH_CONCERNS | BLOCKED | NEEDS_CONTEXT",
+            "- What changed, or what was attempted if blocked",
+            "- Files changed",
+            "- Exact verification commands and results",
+            "- Concerns or follow-up needed",
+            "",
+        ]
+    )
     return "\n".join(lines)