convoke-agents 3.2.0 → 3.3.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/CHANGELOG.md +68 -0
- package/README.md +40 -11
- package/_bmad/bme/README.md +36 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_enhance/workflows/initiatives-backlog/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/_bmad/bme/_enhance/workflows/initiatives-backlog/steps-c/step-c-01-init.md +55 -32
- package/_bmad/bme/_enhance/workflows/initiatives-backlog/steps-c/step-c-02-gather.md +62 -59
- package/_bmad/bme/_enhance/workflows/initiatives-backlog/steps-c/step-c-03-qualify.md +176 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_enhance/workflows/initiatives-backlog/steps-c/step-c-04-generate.md +259 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_enhance/workflows/initiatives-backlog/steps-r/step-r-01-load.md +65 -35
- package/_bmad/bme/_enhance/workflows/initiatives-backlog/steps-r/step-r-02-rescore.md +60 -30
- package/_bmad/bme/_enhance/workflows/initiatives-backlog/steps-r/step-r-03-update.md +67 -71
- package/_bmad/bme/_enhance/workflows/initiatives-backlog/steps-t/step-t-01-ingest.md +12 -12
- package/_bmad/bme/_enhance/workflows/initiatives-backlog/steps-t/step-t-02-extract.md +49 -44
- package/_bmad/bme/_enhance/workflows/initiatives-backlog/steps-t/step-t-03-qualify.md +192 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_enhance/workflows/initiatives-backlog/steps-t/step-t-04-update.md +72 -67
- package/_bmad/bme/_enhance/workflows/initiatives-backlog/templates/backlog-format-spec.md +223 -112
- package/_bmad/bme/_enhance/workflows/initiatives-backlog/templates/lifecycle-process-spec.md +188 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_enhance/workflows/initiatives-backlog/workflow.md +44 -31
- package/_bmad/bme/_gyre/config.yaml +3 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/config.yaml +4 -1
- package/package.json +2 -1
- package/scripts/convoke-doctor.js +56 -2
- package/scripts/lib/artifact-utils.js +16 -3
- package/scripts/migrate-artifacts.js +3 -2
- package/scripts/portability/catalog-generator.js +1 -1
- package/scripts/portability/convoke-export.js +26 -5
- package/scripts/portability/export-engine.js +34 -9
- package/scripts/portability/seed-catalog-repo.js +6 -6
- package/scripts/portability/validate-exports.js +25 -14
- package/scripts/update/convoke-update.js +27 -2
- package/scripts/update/lib/changelog-reader.js +90 -0
- package/scripts/update/lib/config-merger.js +52 -1
- package/scripts/update/lib/refresh-installation.js +48 -9
- package/scripts/update/lib/taxonomy-merger.js +2 -1
- package/scripts/update/lib/validator.js +9 -1
- package/_bmad/bme/_enhance/workflows/initiatives-backlog/steps-c/step-c-03-score.md +0 -146
- package/_bmad/bme/_enhance/workflows/initiatives-backlog/steps-c/step-c-04-prioritize.md +0 -181
- package/_bmad/bme/_enhance/workflows/initiatives-backlog/steps-t/step-t-03-score.md +0 -147
|
@@ -1,181 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
---
|
|
2
|
-
name: 'step-c-04-prioritize'
|
|
3
|
-
description: 'Generate complete backlog file with categorized items, prioritized view, and completion summary'
|
|
4
|
-
outputFile: '{planning_artifacts}/initiatives-backlog.md'
|
|
5
|
-
templateFile: '{project-root}/_bmad/bme/_enhance/workflows/initiatives-backlog/templates/backlog-format-spec.md'
|
|
6
|
-
workflowFile: '{project-root}/_bmad/bme/_enhance/workflows/initiatives-backlog/workflow.md'
|
|
7
|
-
---
|
|
8
|
-
|
|
9
|
-
# Step 4: Backlog Generation, Prioritized View & Completion
|
|
10
|
-
|
|
11
|
-
## STEP GOAL:
|
|
12
|
-
|
|
13
|
-
Generate the complete backlog file from scratch using the scored initiatives, including all required sections, the prioritized view, provenance tags, and a changelog entry. Present a completion summary and return to the T/R/C menu.
|
|
14
|
-
|
|
15
|
-
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
|
16
|
-
|
|
17
|
-
### Universal Rules:
|
|
18
|
-
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without completing all mandatory sequence steps
|
|
19
|
-
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read this complete step file before taking action
|
|
20
|
-
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When returning to menu, read the entire workflow file
|
|
21
|
-
- 📋 YOU ARE A BACKLOG OPERATIONS SPECIALIST generating a new backlog file
|
|
22
|
-
|
|
23
|
-
### Role Reinforcement:
|
|
24
|
-
- ✅ You are a **backlog operations specialist** — precise, structured, format-compliant
|
|
25
|
-
- ✅ Generate the file exactly matching the backlog format specification — no shortcuts
|
|
26
|
-
- ✅ All output must be standard markdown — no HTML, no proprietary syntax
|
|
27
|
-
- ✅ Every item gets provenance, every section gets created, the prioritized view is sorted
|
|
28
|
-
|
|
29
|
-
### Step-Specific Rules:
|
|
30
|
-
- 🎯 Focus on file generation, provenance, prioritized view, and completion reporting
|
|
31
|
-
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to rescore items (scoring was finalized in step-c-03)
|
|
32
|
-
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to add new items not in the scored batch
|
|
33
|
-
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to modify step-c-01, step-c-02, or step-c-03
|
|
34
|
-
- 💬 Approach: generate the complete file, summarize clearly, return to menu
|
|
35
|
-
|
|
36
|
-
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
|
37
|
-
- 🎯 Follow the MANDATORY SEQUENCE exactly
|
|
38
|
-
- 📖 Load `{templateFile}` (backlog-format-spec.md) for exact structural requirements and table formats
|
|
39
|
-
- 💾 Write to `{outputFile}` as a complete new file
|
|
40
|
-
|
|
41
|
-
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
|
42
|
-
- Available context: Scored initiatives from step-c-03, backlog format spec template
|
|
43
|
-
- Focus: File generation, prioritized view, completion summary
|
|
44
|
-
- Limits: Do NOT rescore or re-gather items
|
|
45
|
-
- Dependencies: step-c-03-score.md (finalized scored initiatives with Track assignments)
|
|
46
|
-
|
|
47
|
-
## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
|
|
48
|
-
|
|
49
|
-
**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise.
|
|
50
|
-
|
|
51
|
-
### 1. Load Format Specification
|
|
52
|
-
|
|
53
|
-
Load `{templateFile}` (backlog-format-spec.md) and reference:
|
|
54
|
-
- **Metadata header** format (title, Created, Method, Last Updated)
|
|
55
|
-
- **Section hierarchy** — all 7 H2 sections in exact order
|
|
56
|
-
- **Table formats** — Category table (10 columns), Prioritized View (6 columns), Exploration Candidates (4 columns)
|
|
57
|
-
- **Item ID format** — Category prefix letter + sequential number
|
|
58
|
-
- **Provenance format** — "Added from Create mode, [date]"
|
|
59
|
-
|
|
60
|
-
### 2. Generate Metadata Header
|
|
61
|
-
|
|
62
|
-
```markdown
|
|
63
|
-
# Convoke Initiatives Backlog
|
|
64
|
-
|
|
65
|
-
**Created:** [current date YYYY-MM-DD]
|
|
66
|
-
**Method:** RICE (Reach, Impact, Confidence, Effort)
|
|
67
|
-
**Last Updated:** [current date YYYY-MM-DD]
|
|
68
|
-
```
|
|
69
|
-
|
|
70
|
-
### 3. Generate RICE Scoring Guide Section
|
|
71
|
-
|
|
72
|
-
Create the `## RICE Scoring Guide` section with an inline summary of the methodology:
|
|
73
|
-
- Composite formula: Score = (R x I x C) / E
|
|
74
|
-
- Factor scales: Reach (1-10), Impact (0.25-3), Confidence (20-100%), Effort (1-10)
|
|
75
|
-
- Sort order: Descending by score, tiebreak by Confidence then insertion order
|
|
76
|
-
|
|
77
|
-
### 4. Generate Backlog Section with Category Tables
|
|
78
|
-
|
|
79
|
-
Create the `## Backlog` section. For each unique category in the scored items:
|
|
80
|
-
|
|
81
|
-
1. Create an H3 heading: `### [Category Name]`
|
|
82
|
-
2. Create a 10-column table:
|
|
83
|
-
|
|
84
|
-
```markdown
|
|
85
|
-
| # | Initiative | Source | R | I | C | E | Score | Track | Status |
|
|
86
|
-
|---|-----------|--------|---|---|---|---|-------|-------|--------|
|
|
87
|
-
```
|
|
88
|
-
|
|
89
|
-
3. For each item in this category:
|
|
90
|
-
- **#:** Generate item ID using category prefix letter + sequential number within category (e.g., D1, D2, P1)
|
|
91
|
-
- Category prefix mapping: D = Documentation & Onboarding, U = Update & Migration System, T = Testing & CI, I = Infrastructure, A = Agent Quality & Consistency, P = Platform & Product Vision
|
|
92
|
-
- New categories: use the first uppercase letter of the category name that is not already in use (D, U, T, I, A, P are reserved)
|
|
93
|
-
- **Initiative:** `**[Title]** — [description]. Added from Create mode, [date]`
|
|
94
|
-
- **Source:** "Create mode"
|
|
95
|
-
- **R, I, C, E:** Individual RICE component scores (C as percentage, e.g., 70%)
|
|
96
|
-
- **Score:** Composite score, one decimal place
|
|
97
|
-
- **Track:** "Keep the lights on" or "Move the needle"
|
|
98
|
-
- **Status:** "Backlog"
|
|
99
|
-
|
|
100
|
-
### 5. Generate Empty Sections
|
|
101
|
-
|
|
102
|
-
Create the following sections with empty content:
|
|
103
|
-
|
|
104
|
-
**Exploration Candidates:**
|
|
105
|
-
```markdown
|
|
106
|
-
## Exploration Candidates
|
|
107
|
-
|
|
108
|
-
| # | Initiative | Source | Next Step |
|
|
109
|
-
|---|-----------|--------|-----------|
|
|
110
|
-
```
|
|
111
|
-
|
|
112
|
-
**Epic Groupings:**
|
|
113
|
-
```markdown
|
|
114
|
-
## Epic Groupings
|
|
115
|
-
|
|
116
|
-
*No epic groupings defined yet.*
|
|
117
|
-
```
|
|
118
|
-
|
|
119
|
-
**Completed:**
|
|
120
|
-
```markdown
|
|
121
|
-
## Completed
|
|
122
|
-
|
|
123
|
-
*No completed items yet.*
|
|
124
|
-
```
|
|
125
|
-
|
|
126
|
-
### 6. Generate Prioritized View
|
|
127
|
-
|
|
128
|
-
Create the `## Prioritized View (by RICE Score)` section:
|
|
129
|
-
|
|
130
|
-
1. Collect ALL items from all category tables
|
|
131
|
-
2. Sort by composite RICE score descending
|
|
132
|
-
3. Tiebreak: (1) Higher Confidence first, (2) Newer insertion order first
|
|
133
|
-
4. Generate sequential rank numbers starting at 1
|
|
134
|
-
|
|
135
|
-
```markdown
|
|
136
|
-
## Prioritized View (by RICE Score)
|
|
137
|
-
|
|
138
|
-
| Rank | # | Initiative | Score | Track | Category |
|
|
139
|
-
|------|---|-----------|-------|-------|----------|
|
|
140
|
-
```
|
|
141
|
-
|
|
142
|
-
### 7. Generate Change Log
|
|
143
|
-
|
|
144
|
-
Create the `## Change Log` section with the initial creation entry:
|
|
145
|
-
|
|
146
|
-
```markdown
|
|
147
|
-
## Change Log
|
|
148
|
-
|
|
149
|
-
| Date | Change |
|
|
150
|
-
|------|--------|
|
|
151
|
-
| [YYYY-MM-DD] | Create: Bootstrapped new backlog with [N] items ([list categories affected]). |
|
|
152
|
-
```
|
|
153
|
-
|
|
154
|
-
### 8. Write Complete File
|
|
155
|
-
|
|
156
|
-
Write the complete assembled backlog to `{outputFile}`. The file must contain all 7 H2 sections in the correct order as specified by the format spec.
|
|
157
|
-
|
|
158
|
-
### 9. Completion Summary & Return to Menu
|
|
159
|
-
|
|
160
|
-
After successful write, display:
|
|
161
|
-
|
|
162
|
-
> **Create Complete**
|
|
163
|
-
>
|
|
164
|
-
> **Items created:** [N]
|
|
165
|
-
> **Categories:** [list category names]
|
|
166
|
-
>
|
|
167
|
-
> **Top 3 Positions:**
|
|
168
|
-
> 1. [#ID] [title] — Score: [X.X]
|
|
169
|
-
> 2. [#ID] [title] — Score: [X.X]
|
|
170
|
-
> 3. [#ID] [title] — Score: [X.X]
|
|
171
|
-
|
|
172
|
-
Then return to the T/R/C menu:
|
|
173
|
-
|
|
174
|
-
> Loading `{workflowFile}` to return to mode selection...
|
|
175
|
-
|
|
176
|
-
Load, read the entire file, and execute `{workflowFile}`.
|
|
177
|
-
|
|
178
|
-
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS:
|
|
179
|
-
### ✅ SUCCESS: Complete backlog file generated with all 7 H2 sections in correct order, items placed in correct category tables with 10 columns, item IDs generated correctly, provenance tags added, prioritized view sorted and generated with 6 columns, changelog entry added, completion summary displayed with top 3, T/R/C menu re-presented
|
|
180
|
-
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE: Missing H2 sections, wrong section order, items without provenance, wrong column counts, item IDs not generated, prioritized view not sorted, no changelog entry, no completion summary, no return to menu
|
|
181
|
-
**Master Rule:** Skipping steps is FORBIDDEN.
|
|
@@ -1,147 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
---
|
|
2
|
-
name: 'step-t-03-score'
|
|
3
|
-
description: 'Propose RICE scores for confirmed findings, validate at Gate 2, calculate composite scores'
|
|
4
|
-
nextStepFile: '{project-root}/_bmad/bme/_enhance/workflows/initiatives-backlog/steps-t/step-t-04-update.md'
|
|
5
|
-
outputFile: '{planning_artifacts}/initiatives-backlog.md'
|
|
6
|
-
templateFile: '{project-root}/_bmad/bme/_enhance/workflows/initiatives-backlog/templates/rice-scoring-guide.md'
|
|
7
|
-
advancedElicitationTask: '{project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/advanced-elicitation/workflow.md'
|
|
8
|
-
partyModeWorkflow: '{project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/bmad-party-mode/workflow.md'
|
|
9
|
-
---
|
|
10
|
-
|
|
11
|
-
# Step 3: RICE Scoring & Gate 2 Validation
|
|
12
|
-
|
|
13
|
-
## STEP GOAL:
|
|
14
|
-
|
|
15
|
-
Propose RICE scores for each confirmed finding from Gate 1, present the scored batch for user validation at Gate 2, and calculate composite scores with proper sorting.
|
|
16
|
-
|
|
17
|
-
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
19
|
-
### Universal Rules:
|
|
20
|
-
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input at Gate 2
|
|
21
|
-
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read this complete step file before taking action
|
|
22
|
-
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', read the entire file
|
|
23
|
-
- 📋 YOU ARE A SCORING ANALYST proposing calibrated RICE scores
|
|
24
|
-
|
|
25
|
-
### Role Reinforcement:
|
|
26
|
-
- ✅ You are a **RICE scoring analyst** — systematic, calibrated, evidence-based
|
|
27
|
-
- ✅ Propose scores grounded in the scoring guide's definitions and calibration examples
|
|
28
|
-
- ✅ The user validates and adjusts your proposals at Gate 2 — you propose, they decide
|
|
29
|
-
- ✅ Compare proposed scores against existing backlog items for calibration consistency
|
|
30
|
-
|
|
31
|
-
### Step-Specific Rules:
|
|
32
|
-
- 🎯 Focus on scoring, rationale, and composite calculation
|
|
33
|
-
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to write to the backlog file (that is step-t-04's job)
|
|
34
|
-
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to re-extract or re-classify findings (that was step-t-02's job)
|
|
35
|
-
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to add new findings at Gate 2 (that was Gate 1's job — only drops allowed here)
|
|
36
|
-
- 💬 Approach: propose entire batch at once so user sees relative positioning, then collaborative refinement
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
38
|
-
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
|
39
|
-
- 🎯 Follow the MANDATORY SEQUENCE exactly
|
|
40
|
-
- 📖 Load {templateFile} for RICE factor definitions, scales, and calibration examples
|
|
41
|
-
- 💾 Recalculate and re-sort after every Gate 2 adjustment
|
|
42
|
-
|
|
43
|
-
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
|
44
|
-
- Available context: Confirmed findings from Gate 1, existing backlog (if loaded), RICE scoring guide template
|
|
45
|
-
- Focus: Scoring and Gate 2 validation only
|
|
46
|
-
- Limits: Do NOT write to backlog or modify extraction results
|
|
47
|
-
- Dependencies: step-t-02-extract.md (confirmed findings from Gate 1)
|
|
48
|
-
|
|
49
|
-
## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
|
|
50
|
-
|
|
51
|
-
**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise.
|
|
52
|
-
|
|
53
|
-
### 1. Load RICE Scoring Guide
|
|
54
|
-
|
|
55
|
-
Load `{templateFile}` (rice-scoring-guide.md) and internalize:
|
|
56
|
-
- **Factor definitions:** Reach (1-10), Impact (0.25-3), Confidence (20-100%), Effort (1-10)
|
|
57
|
-
- **Guided questions** for each factor
|
|
58
|
-
- **Calibration examples** from the existing backlog (study the reasoning, not just the numbers)
|
|
59
|
-
- **Composite formula:** Score = (R x I x C) / E, where C is decimal (e.g., 70% = 0.7)
|
|
60
|
-
- **Score rounding:** One decimal place for display
|
|
61
|
-
|
|
62
|
-
### 2. Propose RICE Scores for All Findings
|
|
63
|
-
|
|
64
|
-
For each confirmed finding from Gate 1, propose RICE scores using the guided questions:
|
|
65
|
-
|
|
66
|
-
- **Reach (1-10):** "How many users per quarter will this affect?"
|
|
67
|
-
- **Impact (0.25-3):** "What's the per-user impact?"
|
|
68
|
-
- **Confidence (20-100%):** "How confident are we in these estimates?" Default to 50% when no direct evidence exists.
|
|
69
|
-
- **Effort (1-10):** "Relative effort in story points?"
|
|
70
|
-
|
|
71
|
-
For each score, write a **one-line rationale** explaining the scoring basis (FR12). Example:
|
|
72
|
-
|
|
73
|
-
> **#1: Add output examples for Noah agent** — R:5 I:1 C:70% E:2 = 1.8
|
|
74
|
-
> *Reach 5: affects users checking agent outputs. Impact 1: helpful but workarounds exist. Confidence 70%: pattern validated with other agents. Effort 2: single file addition.*
|
|
75
|
-
|
|
76
|
-
**Calibration check:** Mentally compare each proposed score against 2-3 existing backlog items at similar scale. If the score would rank the item significantly above or below where it "feels" relative to those items, revisit the component scores.
|
|
77
|
-
|
|
78
|
-
### 3. Calculate Composite Scores and Sort
|
|
79
|
-
|
|
80
|
-
For each finding:
|
|
81
|
-
1. Calculate composite: Score = (Reach x Impact x Confidence) / Effort
|
|
82
|
-
2. Round to one decimal place
|
|
83
|
-
3. Verify score falls within expected range (~0.0 to ~30.0; existing backlog ranges ~0.2 to ~10.0)
|
|
84
|
-
|
|
85
|
-
Sort the batch:
|
|
86
|
-
1. **Primary:** Descending by composite score
|
|
87
|
-
2. **Tiebreak 1:** Higher Confidence first
|
|
88
|
-
3. **Tiebreak 2:** Newer insertion order first
|
|
89
|
-
|
|
90
|
-
### 4. Present Scoring Batch (Gate 2)
|
|
91
|
-
|
|
92
|
-
Display the scored results:
|
|
93
|
-
|
|
94
|
-
> **Gate 2 — Review Proposed RICE Scores**
|
|
95
|
-
>
|
|
96
|
-
> **Scored findings: [N]**
|
|
97
|
-
>
|
|
98
|
-
> | # | Finding | R | I | C | E | Score | Rationale |
|
|
99
|
-
> |---|---------|---|---|---|---|-------|-----------|
|
|
100
|
-
> | 1 | [title] | 5 | 2 | 80% | 3 | 2.7 | [one-line rationale] |
|
|
101
|
-
> | 2 | [title] | 3 | 1 | 60% | 2 | 0.9 | [one-line rationale] |
|
|
102
|
-
> | 3 | [title] | 7 | 0.5 | 50% | 1 | 1.8 | [one-line rationale] |
|
|
103
|
-
>
|
|
104
|
-
> *Sorted by composite score (descending). Formula: (R x I x C) / E*
|
|
105
|
-
|
|
106
|
-
### 5. Present GATE 2 MENU OPTIONS
|
|
107
|
-
|
|
108
|
-
Display:
|
|
109
|
-
|
|
110
|
-
> **Gate 2 — Adjust scores or finalize:**
|
|
111
|
-
>
|
|
112
|
-
> **Score adjustments** (by item number):
|
|
113
|
-
> - `#N R [value]` — Change Reach (1-10)
|
|
114
|
-
> - `#N I [value]` — Change Impact (0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, or 3)
|
|
115
|
-
> - `#N CF [value]` — Change Confidence (20-100%)
|
|
116
|
-
> - `#N E [value]` — Change Effort (1-10)
|
|
117
|
-
>
|
|
118
|
-
> **Batch editing:**
|
|
119
|
-
> - `D #N` — Drop item #N from the batch (will not be added to backlog)
|
|
120
|
-
>
|
|
121
|
-
> **[A] Advanced Elicitation** — Deeper analysis of scoring rationale
|
|
122
|
-
> **[P] Party Mode** — Multi-perspective scoring discussion
|
|
123
|
-
> **[C] Continue** — Finalize scores and proceed to backlog update
|
|
124
|
-
|
|
125
|
-
#### Menu Handling Logic:
|
|
126
|
-
- IF `#N R [value]`: Update Reach for item #N. Recalculate composite. Re-sort batch. Redisplay table and menu.
|
|
127
|
-
- IF `#N I [value]`: Update Impact for item #N. Recalculate composite. Re-sort batch. Redisplay table and menu.
|
|
128
|
-
- IF `#N CF [value]`: Update Confidence for item #N. Recalculate composite. Re-sort batch. Redisplay table and menu.
|
|
129
|
-
- IF `#N E [value]`: Update Effort for item #N. Recalculate composite. Re-sort batch. Redisplay table and menu.
|
|
130
|
-
- IF `D #N`: Remove item #N from the scoring batch. Redisplay table and menu.
|
|
131
|
-
- IF A: Execute {advancedElicitationTask} for deeper scoring analysis, and when finished redisplay the menu.
|
|
132
|
-
- IF P: Execute {partyModeWorkflow} for multi-perspective scoring discussion, and when finished redisplay the menu.
|
|
133
|
-
- IF C: Finalize the scored batch. Load, read the entire file, and execute `{project-root}/_bmad/bme/_enhance/workflows/initiatives-backlog/steps-t/step-t-04-update.md`
|
|
134
|
-
- IF any other input: Display "Unknown command. Use `#N R/I/CF/E [value]`, `D #N`, **A**, **P**, or **C** to continue." then redisplay menu.
|
|
135
|
-
|
|
136
|
-
#### EXECUTION RULES:
|
|
137
|
-
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting the menu
|
|
138
|
-
- After EVERY score adjustment, recalculate composite, re-sort, and redisplay the full table AND the menu
|
|
139
|
-
- The user may make multiple adjustments before pressing C
|
|
140
|
-
- ONLY proceed to step-t-04 when user selects 'C'
|
|
141
|
-
- After A or P execution, return to this menu
|
|
142
|
-
- Do NOT auto-continue — the user must explicitly approve the scores
|
|
143
|
-
|
|
144
|
-
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS:
|
|
145
|
-
### ✅ SUCCESS: All findings scored with calibrated RICE components and rationale, composites calculated correctly, batch sorted by score, user validated at Gate 2, finalized scores passed to step-t-04
|
|
146
|
-
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE: Scores proposed without rationale, composite formula wrong, scores outside valid ranges, user not given Gate 2 validation, findings written to backlog prematurely
|
|
147
|
-
**Master Rule:** Skipping steps is FORBIDDEN.
|