continuous-improvement 3.0.0 → 3.8.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/.claude-plugin/marketplace.json +78 -0
- package/CHANGELOG.md +210 -0
- package/LICENSE +21 -21
- package/QUICKSTART.md +101 -81
- package/README.md +224 -198
- package/SKILL.md +87 -9
- package/action.yml +33 -0
- package/bin/analyze.sh +161 -153
- package/bin/backfill.mjs +172 -0
- package/bin/check-docs-substrings.mjs +333 -0
- package/bin/check-everything-mirror.mjs +145 -0
- package/bin/check-routing-targets.mjs +151 -0
- package/bin/check-skill-law-tag.mjs +128 -0
- package/bin/check-skill-mirror.mjs +119 -0
- package/bin/check-skill-tiers.mjs +116 -0
- package/bin/check-third-party-shape.mjs +202 -0
- package/bin/generate-plugin-manifests.mjs +169 -0
- package/bin/harvest-friction.mjs +279 -0
- package/bin/hook-stats.mjs +258 -0
- package/bin/install.mjs +418 -456
- package/bin/lint-transcript.mjs +239 -0
- package/bin/mcp-server.mjs +842 -499
- package/bin/observe.mjs +148 -0
- package/bin/pre-commit-block-strays.sh +49 -0
- package/bin/refresh-third-party.mjs +416 -0
- package/bin/unified-cli.mjs +533 -0
- package/commands/continuous-improvement.md +115 -74
- package/commands/dashboard.md +56 -0
- package/commands/discipline.md +51 -0
- package/commands/harvest.md +76 -0
- package/commands/learn-eval.md +117 -0
- package/commands/planning-with-files.md +66 -0
- package/commands/proceed-with-the-recommendation.md +62 -0
- package/commands/ralph.md +103 -0
- package/commands/release-train.md +81 -0
- package/commands/seven-laws.md +16 -0
- package/commands/superpowers.md +153 -0
- package/commands/swarm.md +101 -0
- package/commands/workspace-surface-audit.md +77 -0
- package/hooks/observe.sh +172 -134
- package/hooks/session.sh +106 -106
- package/hooks/three-section-close.mjs +181 -0
- package/instinct-packs/go.json +58 -0
- package/instinct-packs/meta.json +16 -0
- package/instinct-packs/python.json +58 -0
- package/instinct-packs/react.json +58 -0
- package/lib/cli-anything.mjs +401 -0
- package/lib/compound-engineering.mjs +831 -0
- package/lib/observe-event.mjs +128 -0
- package/lib/plugin-metadata.mjs +432 -0
- package/lib/pm-marketplace.mjs +61 -0
- package/lib/pm-skills.mjs +1274 -0
- package/lib/resolve-home-dir.mjs +43 -0
- package/lib/skill-tiers.mjs +137 -0
- package/lib/unified-plugin.mjs +924 -0
- package/llms.txt +68 -0
- package/package.json +38 -15
- package/plugins/beginner.json +17 -6
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/.claude-plugin/marketplace.json +20 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +26 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/LICENSE +21 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/README.md +56 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/bin/backfill.mjs +172 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/bin/mcp-server.mjs +886 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/bin/observe.mjs +148 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/commands/continuous-improvement.md +115 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/commands/dashboard.md +56 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/commands/discipline.md +51 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/commands/harvest.md +76 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/commands/learn-eval.md +117 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/commands/planning-with-files.md +66 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/commands/proceed-with-the-recommendation.md +62 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/commands/ralph.md +103 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/commands/release-train.md +81 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/commands/seven-laws.md +16 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/commands/superpowers.md +153 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/commands/swarm.md +101 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/commands/workspace-surface-audit.md +77 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/hooks/hooks.json +60 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/hooks/observe.sh +172 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/hooks/session.sh +106 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/hooks/three-section-close.mjs +181 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/instinct-packs/go.json +58 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/instinct-packs/meta.json +16 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/instinct-packs/python.json +58 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/instinct-packs/react.json +58 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/lib/observe-event.mjs +128 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/lib/plugin-metadata.mjs +432 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/lib/resolve-home-dir.mjs +43 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/skills/README.md +34 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/skills/continuous-improvement/SKILL.md +249 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/skills/deploy-receipt/SKILL.md +131 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/skills/gateguard/SKILL.md +155 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/skills/para-memory-files/SKILL.md +108 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/skills/proceed-with-the-recommendation/SKILL.md +454 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/skills/ralph/SKILL.md +221 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/skills/safety-guard/SKILL.md +76 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/skills/strategic-compact/SKILL.md +104 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/skills/superpowers/SKILL.md +212 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/skills/tdd-workflow/SKILL.md +411 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/skills/token-budget-advisor/SKILL.md +136 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/skills/verification-loop/SKILL.md +192 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/skills/wild-risa-balance/SKILL.md +191 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/skills/workspace-surface-audit/SKILL.md +147 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/templates/planning-with-files/findings.md +8 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/templates/planning-with-files/progress.md +7 -0
- package/plugins/continuous-improvement/templates/planning-with-files/task_plan.md +23 -0
- package/plugins/expert.json +34 -5
- package/skills/README.md +79 -0
- package/skills/deploy-receipt.md +131 -0
- package/skills/gateguard.md +155 -0
- package/skills/para-memory-files.md +108 -0
- package/skills/proceed-with-the-recommendation.md +454 -0
- package/skills/ralph.md +221 -0
- package/skills/safety-guard.md +76 -0
- package/skills/strategic-compact.md +104 -0
- package/skills/superpowers.md +212 -0
- package/skills/tdd-workflow.md +411 -0
- package/skills/token-budget-advisor.md +136 -0
- package/skills/verification-loop.md +192 -0
- package/skills/wild-risa-balance.md +191 -0
- package/skills/workspace-surface-audit.md +147 -0
- package/templates/planning-with-files/findings.md +8 -0
- package/templates/planning-with-files/progress.md +7 -0
- package/templates/planning-with-files/task_plan.md +23 -0
- package/templates/verify-ladder.example.json +47 -0
|
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: proceed-with-the-recommendation
|
|
3
|
+
description: "Execute the agent's prior recommendation list under the 7 Laws — walk in order, route per item, verify, reflect. Standalone companion skill with inline fallbacks when other skills are not installed."
|
|
4
|
+
---
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
# /proceed-with-the-recommendation
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
Walk an agent-generated recommendation list top-to-bottom under the continuous-improvement 7 Laws. Each item is routed to the best specialist skill when available, falls back to concrete inline behavior when it is not.
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
Invoke immediately after the agent has offered a numbered list of recommendations, next steps, or suggested actions.
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
## Trigger phrases
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
- `/proceed-with-the-recommendation`
|
|
15
|
+
- "proceed with your recommendation"
|
|
16
|
+
- "do all of it"
|
|
17
|
+
- "go ahead with the plan"
|
|
18
|
+
- "execute the recommendations"
|
|
19
|
+
- "yes do it" / "all of them"
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
## What happens
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
1. **Pre-flight (Law 1)** — restate the recommendation list in original order, tag each `safe` / `caution` / `needs-approval`
|
|
24
|
+
2. **Plan (Law 2)** — inline restatement if ≤3 items, call `superpowers:writing-plans` if larger
|
|
25
|
+
3. **Execute (Law 3)** — route each item to the preferred skill; apply inline fallback if the skill is not installed
|
|
26
|
+
4. **Verify (Law 4)** — smallest check per item, non-transitive (no later item retroactively verifies an earlier one)
|
|
27
|
+
5. **Iterate (Law 6)** — one change → verify → next; never carry a failure forward
|
|
28
|
+
6. **Reflect (Laws 5 + 7)** — end-of-run Reflection block appended to `observations.jsonl`
|
|
29
|
+
7. **Close** — three-section user-facing block: **What has been done → What is next → Recommendation** (tiered tables + one decisive "My recommendation" paragraph + a binary "Want me to: A or B?" closer)
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
## Hard halts (never silently proceed)
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
- Any `needs-approval` item: deploy, force-push, DB drop, secret change, shared-state mutation
|
|
34
|
+
- Verification failure with non-obvious fix
|
|
35
|
+
- Drive-by temptation outside the original list
|
|
36
|
+
- Context budget above 80%
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
## Pairs best with
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
| Preferred skill | Used for |
|
|
41
|
+
|---|---|
|
|
42
|
+
| `workspace-surface-audit` | Law 1 pre-flight when the list touches unknown surface area |
|
|
43
|
+
| `superpowers:writing-plans` | Plan breakdown when the list >3 items or >150 LOC |
|
|
44
|
+
| `superpowers:*` | Per-item specialist routing (TDD, debugging, review, verification, parallel) |
|
|
45
|
+
| `ralph` | Long-running PRD-style autonomous execution |
|
|
46
|
+
| `simplify`, `security-review`, `documentation-lookup`, `schedule`, `loop`, `update-config`, `commit-commands:*` | continuous-improvement helpers |
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
If none of those are installed, the skill still works — every routing row has an inline fallback and every item still gets a verification step.
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
## Skill file
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
Full behavior is defined in [`skills/proceed-with-the-recommendation.md`](../skills/proceed-with-the-recommendation.md).
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
## Install standalone
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
```bash
|
|
57
|
+
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills/proceed-with-the-recommendation
|
|
58
|
+
curl -L https://raw.githubusercontent.com/naimkatiman/continuous-improvement/main/skills/proceed-with-the-recommendation.md \
|
|
59
|
+
-o ~/.claude/skills/proceed-with-the-recommendation/SKILL.md
|
|
60
|
+
```
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
Restart the Claude Code session so the registry picks it up.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: ralph
|
|
3
|
+
description: "Convert PRD to executable JSON and run autonomous agent loop until all stories complete"
|
|
4
|
+
---
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
# /ralph
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
Ralph is an autonomous AI agent loop that runs repeatedly until all PRD items are complete.
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
## Subcommands
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
### `/ralph init`
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
Initialize Ralph in your project:
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
1. Create `scripts/ralph/` directory
|
|
17
|
+
2. Add `ralph.sh` loop script
|
|
18
|
+
3. Add prompt templates for Amp and Claude Code
|
|
19
|
+
4. Create example `prd.json`
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
### `/ralph convert <prd-file>`
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
Convert a markdown PRD to Ralph's executable JSON format:
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
```
|
|
26
|
+
/ralph convert tasks/prd-auth-feature.md
|
|
27
|
+
```
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
Output: `prd.json` with structured user stories
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
### `/ralph run [iterations]`
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
Run the autonomous loop:
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
```
|
|
36
|
+
/ralph run 10
|
|
37
|
+
```
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
Default: 10 iterations. Stops early if all stories complete.
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
## Ralph Loop Behavior
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
1. **Create branch** from PRD `branchName`
|
|
44
|
+
2. **Pick highest priority** story where `passes: false`
|
|
45
|
+
3. **Implement story** — fresh context, no pollution
|
|
46
|
+
4. **Run quality checks** — typecheck, tests, lint
|
|
47
|
+
5. **Commit if passing** — atomic commits per story
|
|
48
|
+
6. **Update prd.json** — mark `passes: true`
|
|
49
|
+
7. **Log learnings** — append to `progress.txt`
|
|
50
|
+
8. **Repeat** until done or max iterations
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
## Key Files
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
| File | Purpose |
|
|
55
|
+
|------|---------|
|
|
56
|
+
| `prd.json` | Executable PRD with user stories |
|
|
57
|
+
| `progress.txt` | Accumulated learnings |
|
|
58
|
+
| `ralph.sh` | The loop script |
|
|
59
|
+
| `AGENTS.md` | Iteration memory (auto-updated) |
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
## Workflow Integration
|
|
62
|
+
|
|
63
|
+
Ralph works best with:
|
|
64
|
+
- **Superpowers** — for structured development stages
|
|
65
|
+
- **continuous-improvement** — for reflection and learning between iterations
|
|
66
|
+
- **workspace-surface-audit** — to verify capabilities before starting
|
|
67
|
+
|
|
68
|
+
## Critical Concepts
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
### Fresh Context Per Iteration
|
|
71
|
+
Each story runs in isolation. Previous work is visible only via git history and `prd.json`.
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
### AGENTS.md Updates
|
|
74
|
+
Ralph updates `AGENTS.md` after each story so subsequent iterations know what's already done.
|
|
75
|
+
|
|
76
|
+
### Browser Verification
|
|
77
|
+
For UI stories, Ralph starts a dev server and uses Playwright to verify rendering.
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
### Stop Conditions
|
|
80
|
+
- All stories pass
|
|
81
|
+
- Max iterations reached
|
|
82
|
+
- Critical failure (requires human intervention)
|
|
83
|
+
|
|
84
|
+
## Troubleshooting
|
|
85
|
+
|
|
86
|
+
| Issue | Solution |
|
|
87
|
+
|-------|----------|
|
|
88
|
+
| Ralph stuck | Check `prd.json` for malformed stories |
|
|
89
|
+
| Tests failing | Run `npm test` independently to isolate |
|
|
90
|
+
| Uncommitted changes | Check git status, commit or stash |
|
|
91
|
+
| Wrong tool | Use `--tool amp` or `--tool claude` flag |
|
|
92
|
+
|
|
93
|
+
## Example Session
|
|
94
|
+
|
|
95
|
+
```
|
|
96
|
+
User: /ralph convert tasks/prd-checkout.md
|
|
97
|
+
[Creates prd.json with 8 stories]
|
|
98
|
+
|
|
99
|
+
User: /ralph run 15
|
|
100
|
+
[Ralph creates branch, implements stories 1-8 over 12 iterations]
|
|
101
|
+
|
|
102
|
+
[All tests pass, branch ready for PR]
|
|
103
|
+
```
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: release-train
|
|
3
|
+
description: "Autonomous multi-PR release train — plan stacked single-concern PRs, open each on its own branch, monitor CI, rebase on conflicts, and ship in dependency order while you sleep. Driven by report.html horizon item 'Autonomous Multi-PR Release Trains'."
|
|
4
|
+
---
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
# /release-train
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
Long-running autonomous orchestrator for stacked-PR rollouts. Driven by the user's session report (1,218 messages, 178 sessions): the audit-then-execute pattern landed at `fully_achieved` when sessions opened with a stacked-PR plan; sessions that started as big-bang multi-file edits landed at `partially_achieved`.
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
This command formalizes the pattern. It does NOT bypass branch protection, force-push, or merge unreviewed PRs.
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
## Preconditions
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
Before invoking this command:
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
1. A `RELEASE_PLAN.md` (or `docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md`) exists in the repo with a per-PR table, dependency graph, worktree-per-PR, and out-of-scope list. Per the Stacked-PR Plan Precondition in the unified `/superpowers` dispatcher.
|
|
17
|
+
2. The plan was reviewed and explicitly approved by the operator.
|
|
18
|
+
3. The base branch (`main`) is clean and up to date with `origin/main`.
|
|
19
|
+
4. CI is green on `origin/main`.
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
If any precondition fails, this command halts and reports what is missing rather than improvising.
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
## Behavior
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
For each PR in the plan, in dependency order:
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
1. **Worktree** — `git worktree add -b <branch> ../<branch> origin/main` (or off the previous PR's branch when the dependency requires it).
|
|
28
|
+
2. **Implement** — TDD-first per `superpowers:test-driven-development`: failing test, watch it fail, write minimal code, watch it pass, commit.
|
|
29
|
+
3. **Verify** — `superpowers:verification-before-completion` before claiming done. Smallest check that proves correctness.
|
|
30
|
+
4. **Review** — dispatch a fresh subagent for spec-compliance + code-quality two-stage review per `superpowers:subagent-driven-development`. Critical findings block progress.
|
|
31
|
+
5. **Open PR** — `gh pr create --base <base-of-this-PR> --head <branch>` with single-concern description that cites the plan doc.
|
|
32
|
+
6. **Wait for CI** — poll until green. Auto-rebase on conflicts (max 2 attempts; halt on third).
|
|
33
|
+
7. **Address review** — `superpowers:receiving-code-review` to walk reviewer comments. Critical findings produce a fix commit; non-critical are logged on the PR.
|
|
34
|
+
8. **Merge when green and approved** — never bypass branch protection. If branch protection blocks, post a status comment and continue with the next independent PR.
|
|
35
|
+
9. **Deploy receipt** — when the merged branch is on an auto-deploy target, run `deploy-receipt` to verify deployed SHA matches merge SHA + healthcheck 200 before reporting the PR as done.
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
Logs every state transition to `release-train.log` in the repo root.
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
## Stop conditions
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
Halt and surface to the operator if any of these occur:
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
- A `CRITICAL` reviewer finding cannot be auto-resolved.
|
|
44
|
+
- Two consecutive auto-rebase attempts fail on the same PR.
|
|
45
|
+
- A PR has been waiting on CI for more than 30 minutes.
|
|
46
|
+
- A required check (branch protection, status check, required reviewer) blocks merge.
|
|
47
|
+
- A deploy-receipt times out or returns non-200.
|
|
48
|
+
- The plan's dependency graph becomes unsatisfiable (e.g. a dependency PR was closed unmerged).
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
When halted, write a state file to `release-train.halt.md` describing exactly which PR halted, why, and what the operator needs to decide before resuming.
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
## Resuming
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
Re-invoke `/release-train` after the halt is resolved. The orchestrator reads `release-train.log` and `release-train.halt.md` to skip already-merged PRs and resume from the halt point.
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
## Composition
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
This command activates the unified `/superpowers` dispatcher and routes through:
|
|
59
|
+
|
|
60
|
+
- `superpowers:writing-plans` (or its inline fallback) to validate the plan
|
|
61
|
+
- `superpowers:using-git-worktrees` for isolation per PR
|
|
62
|
+
- `superpowers:test-driven-development` for implementation
|
|
63
|
+
- `superpowers:subagent-driven-development` for two-stage review
|
|
64
|
+
- `superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch` for merge decisions
|
|
65
|
+
- `deploy-receipt` (CI-bundled) for production verification
|
|
66
|
+
- `proceed-with-the-recommendation` orchestrator to walk the plan's PR list
|
|
67
|
+
|
|
68
|
+
## Anti-patterns this command refuses
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
- **Big-bang merge.** Will not merge a PR that touches more than 15 non-generated files.
|
|
71
|
+
- **Bypass.** Will not use `--admin`, `--force`, or `--no-verify`.
|
|
72
|
+
- **Speculative fix during CI wait.** Will not push speculative fixes during the first-time-contributor workflow-approval gate.
|
|
73
|
+
- **Drive-by scope.** Will not add a fix outside the plan's scope; logs as deferred follow-up instead.
|
|
74
|
+
|
|
75
|
+
## Example
|
|
76
|
+
|
|
77
|
+
```
|
|
78
|
+
/release-train docs/plans/2026-05-07-unified-five-plugin-dispatcher.md
|
|
79
|
+
```
|
|
80
|
+
|
|
81
|
+
Reads the plan, opens worktrees in dependency order, ships each PR through the full discipline, halts only at policy gates.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: seven-laws
|
|
3
|
+
description: "Brand-aligned alias for /continuous-improvement. Reflect on the current session, analyze observations for patterns, and show instinct status under the 7 Laws of AI Agent Discipline."
|
|
4
|
+
---
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
# /seven-laws
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
Brand-aligned alias for [`/continuous-improvement`](continuous-improvement.md). Both commands run the exact same three-step workflow under the 7 Laws of AI Agent Discipline:
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
1. **Reflect** (Law 5) — generate a reflection block for this session.
|
|
11
|
+
2. **Analyze** (Law 7) — process pending observations into instincts.
|
|
12
|
+
3. **Status** — show all instincts for the project + global with confidence and current level.
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
Run the workflow defined in [`continuous-improvement.md`](continuous-improvement.md). Subcommands `weekly` and `always-on` work identically.
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
`/continuous-improvement` remains supported indefinitely for backward compatibility. Prefer `/seven-laws` going forward — it matches the brand and the SKILL.md spec.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: superpowers
|
|
3
|
+
description: "Activate mandatory agent workflows: brainstorming, TDD, code review, git worktrees, and structured development"
|
|
4
|
+
---
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
# /superpowers
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
Activate the Superpowers mandatory workflow framework. Skills trigger automatically based on context — this is not optional guidance.
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
## Subcommands
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
### `/superpowers status`
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
Show which workflow stages are active:
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
```
|
|
17
|
+
=== Superpowers Status ===
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
Active Skills:
|
|
20
|
+
[x] brainstorming (trigger: new feature request)
|
|
21
|
+
[ ] using-git-worktrees (waiting: design approval)
|
|
22
|
+
[ ] writing-plans (waiting: worktree ready)
|
|
23
|
+
[ ] test-driven-development (waiting: plan approved)
|
|
24
|
+
[ ] requesting-code-review (waiting: implementation)
|
|
25
|
+
[ ] finishing-a-development-branch (waiting: completion)
|
|
26
|
+
```
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
### `/superpowers enable <skill>`
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
Explicitly enable a skill for the current session:
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
```
|
|
33
|
+
/superpowers enable test-driven-development
|
|
34
|
+
```
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
### `/superpowers workflow <type>`
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
Activate a complete workflow preset:
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
| Preset | Skills Activated |
|
|
41
|
+
|--------|------------------|
|
|
42
|
+
| `new-feature` | brainstorming → worktrees → plans → TDD → review → finish |
|
|
43
|
+
| `bug-fix` | systematic-debugging → verification → TDD → review |
|
|
44
|
+
| `refactor` | worktrees → plans → TDD → review → finish |
|
|
45
|
+
| `review` | requesting-code-review → receiving-code-review |
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
Example:
|
|
48
|
+
```
|
|
49
|
+
/superpowers workflow new-feature
|
|
50
|
+
```
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
## Mandatory Skills
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
### brainstorming
|
|
55
|
+
**Triggers:** New feature requests, vague requirements
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
57
|
+
1. Ask clarifying questions
|
|
58
|
+
2. Explore 2-3 alternatives
|
|
59
|
+
3. Present design in sections
|
|
60
|
+
4. Wait for explicit approval
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
### using-git-worktrees
|
|
63
|
+
**Triggers:** Design approved, feature branch needed
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
Creates isolated workspace:
|
|
66
|
+
```bash
|
|
67
|
+
git worktree add -b feature-name ../feature-name
|
|
68
|
+
```
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
### writing-plans
|
|
71
|
+
**Triggers:** Worktree ready, implementation starting
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
Breaks work into bite-sized tasks (2-5 minutes each). Every task includes:
|
|
74
|
+
- Exact file paths
|
|
75
|
+
- Complete code
|
|
76
|
+
- Verification steps
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
78
|
+
### test-driven-development
|
|
79
|
+
**Triggers:** Plan approved, coding begins
|
|
80
|
+
|
|
81
|
+
```
|
|
82
|
+
RED: Write failing test → Watch it fail
|
|
83
|
+
GREEN: Write minimal code → Watch it pass
|
|
84
|
+
REFACTOR: Improve while green → Commit
|
|
85
|
+
```
|
|
86
|
+
|
|
87
|
+
**Rule:** Code written before tests is deleted.
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
### requesting-code-review
|
|
90
|
+
**Triggers:** Task complete, before continuing
|
|
91
|
+
|
|
92
|
+
Two-stage review:
|
|
93
|
+
1. Spec compliance — Does it match the plan?
|
|
94
|
+
2. Code quality — Clean, tested, maintainable?
|
|
95
|
+
|
|
96
|
+
Severity levels: Critical (blocks), Warning (note), Info (log)
|
|
97
|
+
|
|
98
|
+
### finishing-a-development-branch
|
|
99
|
+
**Triggers:** All tasks complete
|
|
100
|
+
|
|
101
|
+
Options presented:
|
|
102
|
+
- Merge to main
|
|
103
|
+
- Create PR
|
|
104
|
+
- Keep branch
|
|
105
|
+
- Discard (with confirmation)
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
## Skill Activation Rules
|
|
108
|
+
|
|
109
|
+
| User Request | Activates |
|
|
110
|
+
|--------------|-----------|
|
|
111
|
+
| "Create a feature" | brainstorming → writing-plans → executing-plans |
|
|
112
|
+
| "Fix this bug" | systematic-debugging → verification → TDD |
|
|
113
|
+
| "Review this code" | requesting-code-review |
|
|
114
|
+
| "Refactor this" | using-git-worktrees → writing-plans → TDD |
|
|
115
|
+
|
|
116
|
+
## Verification Protocol
|
|
117
|
+
|
|
118
|
+
Every skill requires verification before reporting completion:
|
|
119
|
+
|
|
120
|
+
1. **Code runs** without errors
|
|
121
|
+
2. **Output matches** expected result
|
|
122
|
+
3. **Actual result checked** — not assumed
|
|
123
|
+
4. **Build passes**
|
|
124
|
+
5. **Explained** in one sentence
|
|
125
|
+
|
|
126
|
+
## Integration
|
|
127
|
+
|
|
128
|
+
Superpowers integrates with:
|
|
129
|
+
- **continuous-improvement** — reflection and learning after each stage
|
|
130
|
+
- **ralph** — autonomous execution of planned stories
|
|
131
|
+
- **workspace-surface-audit** — verify environment before starting
|
|
132
|
+
|
|
133
|
+
## Example Session
|
|
134
|
+
|
|
135
|
+
```
|
|
136
|
+
User: "Build a checkout flow"
|
|
137
|
+
|
|
138
|
+
[brainstorming activates]
|
|
139
|
+
AI: "Clarifying questions: 1) Payment provider? 2) Guest checkout?"
|
|
140
|
+
|
|
141
|
+
User: "Stripe, yes guest checkout"
|
|
142
|
+
|
|
143
|
+
[writing-plans activates]
|
|
144
|
+
AI: "Plan created with 6 tasks. Approve?"
|
|
145
|
+
|
|
146
|
+
User: "Approved"
|
|
147
|
+
|
|
148
|
+
[using-git-worktrees activates]
|
|
149
|
+
AI: "Created worktree at ../checkout-feature"
|
|
150
|
+
|
|
151
|
+
[test-driven-development activates]
|
|
152
|
+
AI: "Task 1: Write failing test for cart validation..."
|
|
153
|
+
```
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: swarm
|
|
3
|
+
description: "Fan out N parallel sub-agents on isolated worktrees with a shared contract test, produce a comparison report. Driven by report.html horizon item 'Parallel Provider-Migration Agents' — pick winners from real evidence instead of discovering tier limits in production."
|
|
4
|
+
---
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
# /swarm
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
Parallel-agent fan-out for evidence-based decision-making. Driven by the user's session report: provider-swap epics (Trading Economics → Forex Factory, ETF → CFD, Finnhub → R StocksTrader, Stooq removal) each took multiple sessions and hit fallback bugs in production because alternatives were not vetted upfront.
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
This command does not replace the `superpowers:dispatching-parallel-agents` skill — it builds on top of it with a contract-pinned, worktree-isolated, comparison-report shape.
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
## When to use
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
The right trigger is "I need to pick between N options and I have a contract test that defines what 'works' means." Examples:
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
- Evaluating N candidate providers behind a shared interface (the report's recurring need)
|
|
17
|
+
- Trying N candidate refactors against the same test suite
|
|
18
|
+
- Prototyping N candidate library upgrades and measuring which breaks the fewest tests
|
|
19
|
+
- Generating N candidate UI designs that all pass the same accessibility + performance budget
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
Do NOT use this command for:
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
- Open-ended exploration without a contract — use `superpowers:brainstorming` instead
|
|
24
|
+
- Single-implementation tasks — use the `superpowers:dispatching-parallel-agents` skill directly
|
|
25
|
+
- Tasks where the candidates have different contracts — that is N separate jobs, not a swarm
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
## Preconditions
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
1. A shared contract test exists at a path the agents can reference (e.g. `tests/contracts/<name>.test.ts`).
|
|
30
|
+
2. Candidates are listed up front (3-6 typical; 8 max). Letting agents propose candidates is allowed but the list freezes before fan-out.
|
|
31
|
+
3. The base branch is clean.
|
|
32
|
+
4. Each candidate has a clear evaluation rubric: PASS/FAIL per contract test, plus per-candidate measurements (latency, coverage, cost, free-tier limits, etc. — domain-specific).
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
## Behavior
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
1. **Plan** — restate the objective, list candidates, confirm contract test path. If unclear, halt and ask.
|
|
37
|
+
2. **Bootstrap** — for each candidate, create an isolated worktree off `origin/main`: `git worktree add -b swarm/<objective>-<candidate> ../<candidate>`. Pin the base SHA in the swarm log.
|
|
38
|
+
3. **Fan out** — dispatch one fresh sub-agent per candidate via the `Agent` tool, in a single message (parallel, not serial). Each agent receives the contract test path, the candidate name, the rubric, and the worktree path.
|
|
39
|
+
4. **Run** — each agent implements the candidate behind the shared interface, runs the contract test against it, captures measurements per the rubric, and writes findings to `reports/<objective>/<candidate>.md`.
|
|
40
|
+
5. **Synthesize** — when all agents complete, this command produces a decision matrix (candidates × rubric metrics) and recommends a winner with citations to the per-candidate reports.
|
|
41
|
+
6. **Stop** — does NOT merge any candidate's worktree. Does NOT modify production. Output is evidence; the operator decides which candidate to advance.
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
## Topology
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
The default topology is **flat fan-out** — all agents run in parallel, no inter-agent communication. This matches the report's actual gap (provider migrations were each independent prototypes).
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
When `ruflo-swarm` is installed (`/plugin install ruflo-swarm@continuous-improvement`), an alternate topology becomes available: `hierarchical-mesh` with a coordinator role brokering stage hand-off. Activate via `/swarm --topology hierarchical-mesh`.
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
Available topologies (when ruflo-swarm installed):
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
| Topology | When to use |
|
|
52
|
+
|---|---|
|
|
53
|
+
| `flat` (default) | Independent prototypes, no shared state |
|
|
54
|
+
| `hierarchical` | One coordinator + N workers; workers report to coordinator only |
|
|
55
|
+
| `mesh` | Workers can share intermediate findings |
|
|
56
|
+
| `hierarchical-mesh` | Coordinator plus worker-to-worker chat |
|
|
57
|
+
| `ring` | Each worker hands off to the next; sequential within a parallel start |
|
|
58
|
+
| `star` | All workers report to a central evaluator that filters before synthesis |
|
|
59
|
+
| `adaptive` | Topology selected per-step based on intermediate findings |
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
## Stop conditions
|
|
62
|
+
|
|
63
|
+
Halt and surface to the operator if:
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
- Any agent reports the contract test is itself broken (test suite is the source of truth; if it is wrong, no candidate can win).
|
|
66
|
+
- A candidate's evaluation reveals the rubric is incomplete (a metric the rubric doesn't measure changes the answer).
|
|
67
|
+
- More than 50% of agents fail to produce a report (likely environment or harness issue, not candidate quality).
|
|
68
|
+
- The winner-by-rubric and the reports' qualitative findings disagree (surface the conflict; do not paper over it).
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
## Stream observation
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
Long swarm runs feel opaque. When `ruflo-swarm:monitor-stream` is installed, this command emits live progress events to a stream the operator can tail. Without it, this command writes per-step lines to `reports/<objective>/swarm.log` that can be tailed with `tail -f`.
|
|
73
|
+
|
|
74
|
+
## Composition
|
|
75
|
+
|
|
76
|
+
This command activates the unified `/superpowers` dispatcher and routes through:
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
78
|
+
- `superpowers:dispatching-parallel-agents` for the fan-out shape
|
|
79
|
+
- `ruflo-swarm:swarm-init` (when installed) for contract-pinned bootstrap
|
|
80
|
+
- `ruflo-swarm:monitor-stream` (when installed) for stream observation
|
|
81
|
+
- `superpowers:writing-plans` (or inline fallback) for the candidate list + rubric
|
|
82
|
+
- `proceed-with-the-recommendation` for walking the synthesis output as a recommendation list
|
|
83
|
+
|
|
84
|
+
## Anti-patterns this command refuses
|
|
85
|
+
|
|
86
|
+
- **Letting one candidate run before others start.** All worktrees and agents bootstrap together; no early-bird advantage.
|
|
87
|
+
- **Modifying the contract test mid-run.** Test is source of truth; halt instead.
|
|
88
|
+
- **Picking a winner without measurements.** The synthesis must cite the rubric, not just the agents' summaries.
|
|
89
|
+
- **Merging any worktree.** Output is evidence; operator decides advancement.
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
## Example
|
|
92
|
+
|
|
93
|
+
```
|
|
94
|
+
/swarm "Pick the next market data provider"
|
|
95
|
+
|
|
96
|
+
Candidates: Swissquote, R StocksTrader, Twelve Data, Finnhub
|
|
97
|
+
Contract: tests/contracts/provider-contract.test.ts
|
|
98
|
+
Rubric: PASS/FAIL per contract test, p50/p99 latency, symbol coverage for 50 tracked instruments, free-tier limits, monthly cost at expected volume
|
|
99
|
+
```
|
|
100
|
+
|
|
101
|
+
The orchestrator opens four worktrees, runs four agents in parallel, produces `reports/market-data-provider/{swissquote,rstockstrader,twelve-data,finnhub}.md`, and a `decision-matrix.md` with the recommended winner cited from the rubric.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: workspace-surface-audit
|
|
3
|
+
description: "Audit workspace capabilities and recommend continuous-improvement-native skills, hooks, and workflows"
|
|
4
|
+
---
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
# /workspace-surface-audit
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
Audit the active repo, MCP servers, plugins, connectors, env surfaces, and harness setup. Returns a 5-section report with specific next moves.
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
## Usage
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
```
|
|
13
|
+
/workspace-surface-audit
|
|
14
|
+
```
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
## What It Checks
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
1. **Repo surface** — `package.json`, lockfiles, framework config, `.mcp.json`, `.claude/settings*.json`, `AGENTS.md`
|
|
19
|
+
2. **Environment surface** — `.env*` files (key names only, no secrets)
|
|
20
|
+
3. **Connected tools** — installed plugins, MCP servers, LSPs, app integrations
|
|
21
|
+
4. **continuous-improvement surface** — existing skills, commands, hooks, agents
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
## Output Format
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
```
|
|
26
|
+
=== Workspace Surface Audit ===
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
## Current Surface
|
|
29
|
+
- [What is usable right now]
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
## Parity
|
|
32
|
+
- [Where continuous-improvement matches or exceeds benchmarks]
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
## Primitive-Only Gaps
|
|
35
|
+
- [Tools exist, but continuous-improvement lacks clean operator skills]
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
## Missing Integrations
|
|
38
|
+
- [Capabilities not available yet]
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
## Top 3-5 Next Moves
|
|
41
|
+
1. [Concrete continuous-improvement-native addition]
|
|
42
|
+
2. [Ordered by impact]
|
|
43
|
+
```
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
## Rules
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
- **Never print secrets** — only provider names, capability names, file paths
|
|
48
|
+
- **Prefer continuous-improvement** over generic "install another plugin" advice
|
|
49
|
+
- **Organize by workflows**, not API brands
|
|
50
|
+
- **Specific recommendations** — concrete enough to implement without another discovery pass
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
## Example Output
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
```
|
|
55
|
+
## Current Surface
|
|
56
|
+
- MCP: filesystem, github, playwright
|
|
57
|
+
- Plugins: beginner, expert (continuous-improvement)
|
|
58
|
+
- Env: STRIPE_API_KEY, FAL_KEY configured
|
|
59
|
+
- Framework: Next.js 15, React 19, TypeScript
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
## Parity
|
|
62
|
+
- Continuous improvement: covered (native)
|
|
63
|
+
- Testing discipline: covered (TDD workflows)
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
## Primitive-Only Gaps
|
|
66
|
+
- Stripe connected but no billing-operator skill
|
|
67
|
+
- GitHub MCP available but no issue-triage workflow
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
## Missing Integrations
|
|
70
|
+
- No Linear connector detected
|
|
71
|
+
- No Slack webhook configured
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
## Top 3-5 Next Moves
|
|
74
|
+
1. Create billing-operator skill (Stripe integration)
|
|
75
|
+
2. Create github-ops workflow for issue triage
|
|
76
|
+
3. Add Linear connector skill for project management
|
|
77
|
+
```
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
{
|
|
2
|
+
"description": "Observation, session lifecycle, and 3-section-close discipline hooks for continuous-improvement.",
|
|
3
|
+
"hooks": {
|
|
4
|
+
"PreToolUse": [
|
|
5
|
+
{
|
|
6
|
+
"hooks": [
|
|
7
|
+
{
|
|
8
|
+
"type": "command",
|
|
9
|
+
"command": "bash \"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/observe.sh\"",
|
|
10
|
+
"timeout": 5
|
|
11
|
+
}
|
|
12
|
+
]
|
|
13
|
+
}
|
|
14
|
+
],
|
|
15
|
+
"PostToolUse": [
|
|
16
|
+
{
|
|
17
|
+
"hooks": [
|
|
18
|
+
{
|
|
19
|
+
"type": "command",
|
|
20
|
+
"command": "bash \"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/observe.sh\"",
|
|
21
|
+
"timeout": 5
|
|
22
|
+
}
|
|
23
|
+
]
|
|
24
|
+
}
|
|
25
|
+
],
|
|
26
|
+
"SessionStart": [
|
|
27
|
+
{
|
|
28
|
+
"hooks": [
|
|
29
|
+
{
|
|
30
|
+
"type": "command",
|
|
31
|
+
"command": "bash \"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/session.sh\"",
|
|
32
|
+
"timeout": 5
|
|
33
|
+
}
|
|
34
|
+
]
|
|
35
|
+
}
|
|
36
|
+
],
|
|
37
|
+
"SessionEnd": [
|
|
38
|
+
{
|
|
39
|
+
"hooks": [
|
|
40
|
+
{
|
|
41
|
+
"type": "command",
|
|
42
|
+
"command": "bash \"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/session.sh\"",
|
|
43
|
+
"timeout": 5
|
|
44
|
+
}
|
|
45
|
+
]
|
|
46
|
+
}
|
|
47
|
+
],
|
|
48
|
+
"Stop": [
|
|
49
|
+
{
|
|
50
|
+
"hooks": [
|
|
51
|
+
{
|
|
52
|
+
"type": "command",
|
|
53
|
+
"command": "node \"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/three-section-close.mjs\"",
|
|
54
|
+
"timeout": 5
|
|
55
|
+
}
|
|
56
|
+
]
|
|
57
|
+
}
|
|
58
|
+
]
|
|
59
|
+
}
|
|
60
|
+
}
|