conductor-4-all 0.0.18 → 0.0.19
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
|
@@ -117,7 +117,6 @@ CRITICAL: You must validate the success of every tool call. If any tool call fai
|
|
|
117
117
|
b. **Update Product Definition:**
|
|
118
118
|
i. **Condition for Update:** Based on your analysis, you MUST determine if the completed feature or bug fix significantly impacts the description of the product itself.
|
|
119
119
|
ii. **Propose and Confirm Changes:** If an update is needed:
|
|
120
|
-
- **Announce:** Briefly state that updates are proposed. Do NOT repeat the request to review in the chat.
|
|
121
120
|
- **Ask for Approval:** Use the `ask_user` tool to request confirmation. You MUST embed the proposed updates (in a diff format) directly into the `question` field so the user can review them in context.
|
|
122
121
|
- **questions:**
|
|
123
122
|
- **header:** "Product"
|
|
@@ -132,7 +131,6 @@ CRITICAL: You must validate the success of every tool call. If any tool call fai
|
|
|
132
131
|
c. **Update Tech Stack:**
|
|
133
132
|
i. **Condition for Update:** Similarly, you MUST determine if significant changes in the technology stack are detected as a result of the completed track.
|
|
134
133
|
ii. **Propose and Confirm Changes:** If an update is needed:
|
|
135
|
-
- **Announce:** Briefly state that updates are proposed. Do NOT repeat the request to review in the chat.
|
|
136
134
|
- **Ask for Approval:** Use the `ask_user` tool to request confirmation. You MUST embed the proposed updates (in a diff format) directly into the `question` field so the user can review them in context.
|
|
137
135
|
- **questions:**
|
|
138
136
|
- **header:** "Tech Stack"
|
|
@@ -148,7 +146,6 @@ CRITICAL: You must validate the success of every tool call. If any tool call fai
|
|
|
148
146
|
i. **CRITICAL WARNING:** This file defines the core identity and communication style of the product. It should be modified with extreme caution and ONLY in cases of significant strategic shifts, such as a product rebrand or a fundamental change in user engagement philosophy. Routine feature updates or bug fixes should NOT trigger changes to this file.
|
|
149
147
|
ii. **Condition for Update:** You may ONLY propose an update to this file if the track's **Specification** explicitly describes a change that directly impacts branding, voice, tone, or other core product guidelines.
|
|
150
148
|
iii. **Propose and Confirm Changes:** If the conditions are met:
|
|
151
|
-
- **Announce:** Briefly state that updates are proposed. Do NOT repeat the request to review in the chat.
|
|
152
149
|
- **Ask for Approval:** Use the `ask_user` tool to request confirmation. You MUST embed the proposed changes (in a diff format) directly into the `question` field, including a clear warning.
|
|
153
150
|
- **questions:**
|
|
154
151
|
- **header:** "Product"
|
|
@@ -80,7 +80,6 @@ CRITICAL: You must validate the success of every tool call. If any tool call fai
|
|
|
80
80
|
3. **Draft `spec.md`:** Once sufficient information is gathered, draft the content for the track's `spec.md` file, including sections like Overview, Functional Requirements, Non-Functional Requirements (if any), Acceptance Criteria, and Out of Scope.
|
|
81
81
|
|
|
82
82
|
4. **User Confirmation:**
|
|
83
|
-
- **Announce:** Briefly state that the draft is ready (e.g., "Draft generated."). Do NOT repeat the request to "review" or "approve" in the chat.
|
|
84
83
|
- **Ask for Approval:** Use the `ask_user` tool to request confirmation. You MUST embed the drafted content directly into the `question` field so the user can review it in context.
|
|
85
84
|
- **questions:**
|
|
86
85
|
- **header:** "Confirm Spec"
|
|
@@ -113,7 +112,6 @@ CRITICAL: You must validate the success of every tool call. If any tool call fai
|
|
|
113
112
|
* **CRITICAL: Inject Phase Completion Tasks.** Determine if a "Phase Completion Verification and Checkpointing Protocol" is defined in the **Workflow**. If this protocol exists, then for each **Phase** that you generate in `plan.md`, you MUST append a final meta-task to that phase. The format for this meta-task is: `- [ ] Task: Conductor - User Manual Verification '<Phase Name>' (Protocol in workflow.md)`.
|
|
114
113
|
|
|
115
114
|
3. **User Confirmation:**
|
|
116
|
-
- **Announce:** Briefly state that the draft is ready (e.g., "Draft generated."). Do NOT repeat the request to "review" or "approve" in the chat.
|
|
117
115
|
- **Ask for Approval:** Use the `ask_user` tool to request confirmation. You MUST embed the drafted content directly into the `question` field so the user can review it in context.
|
|
118
116
|
- **questions:**
|
|
119
117
|
- **header:** "Confirm Plan"
|
|
@@ -23,7 +23,9 @@ CRITICAL: You must validate the success of every tool call. If any tool call fai
|
|
|
23
23
|
## 1.2 PROJECT AUDIT
|
|
24
24
|
**PROTOCOL: Before starting the setup, determine the project's state by auditing existing artifacts.**
|
|
25
25
|
|
|
26
|
-
1. **Audit
|
|
26
|
+
1. **Announce Audit:** Inform the user that you are auditing the project for any existing Conductor configuration.
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
2. **Audit Artifacts:** Check the file system for the existence of the following files/directories in the `conductor/` directory:
|
|
27
29
|
- `product.md`
|
|
28
30
|
- `product-guidelines.md`
|
|
29
31
|
- `tech-stack.md`
|
|
@@ -32,7 +34,7 @@ CRITICAL: You must validate the success of every tool call. If any tool call fai
|
|
|
32
34
|
- `index.md`
|
|
33
35
|
- `tracks/*/` (specifically `plan.md` and `index.md`)
|
|
34
36
|
|
|
35
|
-
|
|
37
|
+
3. **Determine Target Section:** Map the project's state to a target section using the priority table below (highest match wins). **DO NOT JUMP YET.** Keep this target in mind.
|
|
36
38
|
|
|
37
39
|
| Artifact Exists | Target Section | Announcement |
|
|
38
40
|
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
|
|
@@ -45,7 +47,7 @@ CRITICAL: You must validate the success of every tool call. If any tool call fai
|
|
|
45
47
|
| `product.md` | **Section 2.2** | "Resuming setup: Product Guide is complete. Next: create Product Guidelines." |
|
|
46
48
|
| (None) | **Section 2.0** | (None) |
|
|
47
49
|
|
|
48
|
-
|
|
50
|
+
4. **Proceed to Section 2.0:** You MUST proceed to Section 2.0 to establish the Greenfield/Brownfield context before jumping to your target.
|
|
49
51
|
|
|
50
52
|
---
|
|
51
53
|
|
|
@@ -158,10 +160,9 @@ CRITICAL: You must validate the success of every tool call. If any tool call fai
|
|
|
158
160
|
- **If user chose "Autogenerate":** Use your best judgment to expand on the initial project goal and infer any missing details to create a comprehensive document.
|
|
159
161
|
- **If user chose "Interactive":** Use the specific answers provided. The source of truth is **only the user's selected answer(s)**. You are encouraged to expand on these choices to create a polished output.
|
|
160
162
|
5. **User Confirmation Loop:**
|
|
161
|
-
- **Announce:** Briefly state that the draft is ready (e.g., "Draft generated."). Do NOT repeat the request to "review" or "approve" in the chat.
|
|
162
163
|
- **Ask for Approval:** Use the `ask_user` tool to request confirmation. You MUST embed the drafted content directly into the `question` field so the user can review it in context.
|
|
163
164
|
- **questions:**
|
|
164
|
-
- **header:** "Review"
|
|
165
|
+
- **header:** "Review Draft"
|
|
165
166
|
- **question:**
|
|
166
167
|
Please review the drafted Product Guide below. What would you like to do next?
|
|
167
168
|
|
|
@@ -206,10 +207,9 @@ CRITICAL: You must validate the success of every tool call. If any tool call fai
|
|
|
206
207
|
- **If user chose "Autogenerate":** Use your best judgment to infer standard, high-quality guidelines suitable for the project type.
|
|
207
208
|
- **If user chose "Interactive":** Use the specific answers provided. The source of truth is **only the user's selected answer(s)**. You are encouraged to expand on these choices to create a polished output.
|
|
208
209
|
5. **User Confirmation Loop:**
|
|
209
|
-
- **Announce:** Briefly state that the draft is ready (e.g., "Draft generated."). Do NOT repeat the request to "review" or "approve" in the chat.
|
|
210
210
|
- **Ask for Approval:** Use the `ask_user` tool to request confirmation. You MUST embed the drafted content directly into the `question` field so the user can review it in context.
|
|
211
211
|
- **questions:**
|
|
212
|
-
- **header:** "Review"
|
|
212
|
+
- **header:** "Review Draft"
|
|
213
213
|
- **question:**
|
|
214
214
|
Please review the drafted Product Guidelines below. What would you like to do next?
|
|
215
215
|
|
|
@@ -262,10 +262,9 @@ CRITICAL: You must validate the success of every tool call. If any tool call fai
|
|
|
262
262
|
- **If user chose "Autogenerate":** Use your best judgment to infer a standard, high-quality stack suitable for the project goal.
|
|
263
263
|
- **If user chose "Interactive" or corrected the Brownfield stack:** Use the specific answers provided. The source of truth is **only the user's selected answer(s)**.
|
|
264
264
|
5. **User Confirmation Loop:**
|
|
265
|
-
- **Announce:** Briefly state that the draft is ready (e.g., "Draft generated."). Do NOT repeat the request to "review" or "approve" in the chat.
|
|
266
265
|
- **Ask for Approval:** Use the `ask_user` tool to request confirmation. You MUST embed the drafted content directly into the `question` field so the user can review it in context.
|
|
267
266
|
- **questions:**
|
|
268
|
-
- **header:** "Review"
|
|
267
|
+
- **header:** "Review Draft"
|
|
269
268
|
- **question:**
|
|
270
269
|
Please review the drafted Tech Stack below. What would you like to do next?
|
|
271
270
|
|
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "conductor-4-all",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "0.0.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "0.0.19",
|
|
4
4
|
"description": "Conductor spec-driven development CLI - TypeScript/Node.js version",
|
|
5
5
|
"license": "Apache-2.0",
|
|
6
6
|
"repository": {
|
|
@@ -45,5 +45,8 @@
|
|
|
45
45
|
"gradient-string": "^3.0.0",
|
|
46
46
|
"smol-toml": "^1.6.0",
|
|
47
47
|
"yargs": "^18.0.0"
|
|
48
|
+
},
|
|
49
|
+
"publishConfig": {
|
|
50
|
+
"registry": "https://registry.npmjs.org/"
|
|
48
51
|
}
|
|
49
52
|
}
|