compound-engineering-pi 0.2.3 → 0.2.4

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/README.md CHANGED
@@ -1,124 +1,76 @@
1
1
  # Compound Engineering for Pi
2
2
 
3
- [![Build Status](https://github.com/gvkhosla/compound-engineering-pi/actions/workflows/ci.yml/badge.svg)](https://github.com/gvkhosla/compound-engineering-pi/actions/workflows/ci.yml)
4
3
  [![npm](https://img.shields.io/npm/v/compound-engineering-pi)](https://www.npmjs.com/package/compound-engineering-pi)
4
+ [![Build Status](https://github.com/gvkhosla/compound-engineering-pi/actions/workflows/ci.yml/badge.svg)](https://github.com/gvkhosla/compound-engineering-pi/actions/workflows/ci.yml)
5
5
 
6
- Pi-first extension that takes the original Compound Engineering approach and makes it work smoothly in **Pi**.
7
-
8
- ## 🙌 Credit to the original creators
9
-
10
- This project builds directly on the original work by **Every** and **Kieran**.
11
-
12
- - Upstream plugin (source of truth): https://github.com/EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin
13
- - Compound engineering writeup: https://every.to/chain-of-thought/compound-engineering-how-every-codes-with-agents
14
-
15
- If you’re using Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, or anything non-Pi-focused, use the upstream repo above.
16
-
17
- ---
18
-
19
- ## Why this exists
20
-
21
- The Every plugin is excellent, but Pi has different runtime semantics. This extension adapts the workflow for Pi so it feels native and works out of the box.
22
-
23
- ### What this Pi extension adds
24
-
25
- - Native Pi package install
26
- - Prebuilt Pi resources (`prompts/`, `skills/`, `extensions/`)
27
- - Compatibility tool layer for Claude-style workflows
28
- - Subagent orchestration in Pi (`single`, `parallel`, `chain`)
29
- - MCP compatibility through **MCPorter** (`mcporter_list`, `mcporter_call`)
30
-
31
- ---
32
-
33
- ## Install (recommended)
34
-
35
- ### 1) Install Pi
36
-
37
- - Pi project: https://github.com/mariozechner/pi-coding-agent
38
- - Pi package gallery: https://shittycodingagent.ai/packages
39
- - Discovery request opened with Pi maintainers: https://github.com/badlogic/pi-mono/issues/1480
6
+ Compound Engineering adapted for [Pi](https://github.com/mariozechner/pi-coding-agent). 47 skills, 9 workflow prompts, and a native compatibility layer, all installable in one command.
40
7
 
41
- ### 2) Install MCPorter
8
+ ## Install
42
9
 
43
10
  ```bash
44
- npm i -g mcporter
45
- ```
46
-
47
- ### 3) Install this extension in Pi
48
-
49
- ```bash
50
- # after npm publish:
51
11
  pi install npm:compound-engineering-pi -l
52
- # fallback (works now):
53
- pi install git:github.com/gvkhosla/compound-engineering-pi@v0.2.3 -l
54
12
  ```
55
13
 
56
- ### 4) Reload and test
14
+ Reload your session, then you're ready:
57
15
 
58
16
  ```bash
59
17
  /reload
60
- pi -p "/workflows-plan Build a todo app"
61
18
  ```
62
19
 
63
- Maintainer publish shortcut (first run `npm login` once):
20
+ ## Quick start
64
21
 
65
22
  ```bash
66
- npm run release:ship
23
+ pi -p "/workflows-plan Build a todo app"
24
+ pi -p "/workflows-work"
25
+ pi -p "/workflows-review"
26
+ pi -p "/workflows-compound"
67
27
  ```
68
28
 
69
- ---
70
-
71
- ## What you get immediately in Pi
29
+ These follow the core loop: **Plan, Work, Review, Compound**.
72
30
 
73
- - Workflow prompts like `/workflows-plan`, `/workflows-work`, `/workflows-review`, `/workflows-compound`
74
- - Converted skills and reviewer agents
75
- - Pi compatibility extension with tools:
76
- - `ask_user_question`
77
- - `subagent`
78
- - `mcporter_list`
79
- - `mcporter_call`
31
+ ## What's included
80
32
 
81
- This keeps the same compounding loop in Pi:
33
+ ### Workflow prompts
82
34
 
83
- **Plan Work Review Compound**
35
+ | Prompt | What it does |
36
+ |--------|-------------|
37
+ | `/workflows-plan` | Create a structured project plan |
38
+ | `/workflows-work` | Execute work from a plan |
39
+ | `/workflows-review` | Multi-agent code review |
40
+ | `/workflows-compound` | Document learnings for future sessions |
41
+ | `/workflows-brainstorm` | Explore ideas before planning |
42
+ | `/deepen-plan` | Add depth to an existing plan |
43
+ | `/test-browser` | Run browser tests on your pages |
44
+ | `/feature-video` | Record a video walkthrough of a feature |
45
+ | `/resolve_todo_parallel` | Resolve all pending todos in parallel |
84
46
 
85
- ---
47
+ ### 47 skills
86
48
 
87
- ## How MCP works here
49
+ Code review, research, design, workflow automation, and more. Specialized reviewers for Rails, Python, and TypeScript. Security auditing, architecture analysis, design iteration, git worktree management, image generation, and browser automation.
88
50
 
89
- This extension uses **MCPorter** for MCP interoperability in Pi.
51
+ Run `pi skills` after installing to see the full list.
90
52
 
91
- - No assumption of Claude-native MCP runtime behavior
92
- - Uses `mcporter` CLI under the hood
93
- - Supports project/global config and bundled fallback config
53
+ ### Pi compatibility extension
94
54
 
95
- MCPorter project: https://github.com/steipete/mcporter
55
+ Four tools that bridge common agent workflows into Pi:
96
56
 
97
- ---
57
+ - `ask_user_question` - prompt the user for input
58
+ - `subagent` - orchestrate tasks (`single`, `parallel`, `chain`)
59
+ - `mcporter_list` - list available MCP servers
60
+ - `mcporter_call` - call MCP server tools
98
61
 
99
- ## Advanced (Pi generation workflow)
62
+ ### Optional: MCP support via MCPorter
100
63
 
101
- If you want to regenerate Pi output from the upstream plugin manually:
64
+ For MCP interoperability, install [MCPorter](https://github.com/steipete/mcporter):
102
65
 
103
66
  ```bash
104
- bunx compound-engineering-pi install compound-engineering --to pi --pi-home ~/.pi/agent
67
+ npm i -g mcporter
105
68
  ```
106
69
 
107
- ---
108
-
109
- ## Non-Pi usage (upstream)
110
-
111
- For all non-Pi usage and canonical plugin docs, use:
112
-
113
- - https://github.com/EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin
114
-
115
- That includes Claude Code-native setup, canonical command/skill design, and upstream issues/roadmap.
70
+ ## Credits
116
71
 
117
- ---
72
+ Built on the [Compound Engineering plugin](https://github.com/EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin) by [Every](https://every.to) and [Kieran Klaassen](https://github.com/kieranklaassen). Read the [original writeup](https://every.to/chain-of-thought/compound-engineering-how-every-codes-with-agents).
118
73
 
119
- ## Learn more
74
+ ## License
120
75
 
121
- - Pi guide for this extension: [docs/pi.md](docs/pi.md)
122
- - Validation report: [VALIDATION.md](VALIDATION.md)
123
- - npm release checklist: [NPM_PUBLISH.md](NPM_PUBLISH.md)
124
- - Upstream canonical component docs: https://github.com/EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin/blob/main/plugins/compound-engineering/README.md
76
+ MIT
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "compound-engineering-pi",
3
- "version": "0.2.3",
3
+ "version": "0.2.4",
4
4
  "type": "module",
5
5
  "private": false,
6
6
  "description": "Pi-first Compound Engineering extension with subagents and MCPorter compatibility.",
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "compound-engineering",
3
- "version": "2.31.1",
3
+ "version": "2.31.2",
4
4
  "description": "AI-powered development tools. 29 agents, 24 commands, 18 skills, 1 MCP server for code review, research, design, and workflow automation.",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Kieran Klaassen",
@@ -5,6 +5,12 @@ All notable changes to the compound-engineering plugin will be documented in thi
5
5
  The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/),
6
6
  and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html).
7
7
 
8
+ ## [2.31.2] - 2026-02-13
9
+
10
+ ### Fixed
11
+
12
+ - **`resolve-pr-parallel` skill naming compliance** — Updated skill frontmatter name to `resolve-pr-parallel` (hyphen-case) and aligned command references in docs to avoid Pi package validation warnings for invalid skill names.
13
+
8
14
  ## [2.31.1] - 2026-02-09
9
15
 
10
16
  ### Changed
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ Core workflow commands use `workflows:` prefix to avoid collisions with built-in
98
98
  | `/report-bug` | Report a bug in the plugin |
99
99
  | `/reproduce-bug` | Reproduce bugs using logs and console |
100
100
  | `/resolve_parallel` | Resolve TODO comments in parallel |
101
- | `/resolve_pr_parallel` | Resolve PR comments in parallel |
101
+ | `/resolve-pr-parallel` | Resolve PR comments in parallel |
102
102
  | `/resolve_todo_parallel` | Resolve todos in parallel |
103
103
  | `/triage` | Triage and prioritize issues |
104
104
  | `/test-browser` | Run browser tests on PR-affected pages |
@@ -480,18 +480,20 @@ After writing the enhanced plan, use the **AskUserQuestion tool** to present the
480
480
 
481
481
  **Options:**
482
482
  1. **View diff** - Show what was added/changed
483
- 2. **Run `/technical_review`** - Get feedback from reviewers on enhanced plan
484
- 3. **Start `/workflows:work`** - Begin implementing this enhanced plan
483
+ 2. **Use `/technical_review`** - Get feedback from reviewers on enhanced plan
484
+ 3. **Use `/workflows:work`** - Begin implementing this enhanced plan
485
485
  4. **Deepen further** - Run another round of research on specific sections
486
486
  5. **Revert** - Restore original plan (if backup exists)
487
487
 
488
488
  Based on selection:
489
489
  - **View diff** → Run `git diff [plan_path]` or show before/after
490
- - **`/technical_review`** → Call the /technical_review command with the plan file path
491
- - **`/workflows:work`** → Call the /workflows:work command with the plan file path
490
+ - **`/technical_review`** → Run `pi --no-session -p "/technical_review [plan_path]"`
491
+ - **`/workflows:work`** → Run `pi --no-session -p "/workflows:work [plan_path]"`
492
492
  - **Deepen further** → Ask which sections need more research, then re-run those agents
493
493
  - **Revert** → Restore from git or backup
494
494
 
495
+ **Important:** Slash commands (like `/workflows:work`) are prompt templates, not shell executables. Never run `/...` directly via bash.
496
+
495
497
  ## Example Enhancement
496
498
 
497
499
  **Before (from /workflows:plan):**
@@ -328,5 +328,5 @@ mcp__xcodebuildmcp__shutdown_simulator({ simulator_id: "[uuid]" })
328
328
  When reviewing PRs that touch iOS code, the `/workflows:review` command can spawn this as a subagent:
329
329
 
330
330
  ```
331
- Task general-purpose("Run /xcode-test for scheme [name]. Build, install on simulator, test key screens, check for crashes.")
331
+ Task general-purpose("Invoke `/xcode-test` as a prompt for scheme [name]. Build, install on simulator, test key screens, check for crashes. Never run `/xcode-test` directly via bash.")
332
332
  ```
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ When done give these options
305
305
  ```markdown
306
306
  What would you like to do next?
307
307
 
308
- 1. run /resolve_todo_parallel to resolve the todos
308
+ 1. invoke `/resolve_todo_parallel` as a prompt to resolve the todos
309
309
  2. commit the todos
310
310
  3. nothing, go chill
311
311
  ```
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ Use **AskUserQuestion tool** to present next steps:
86
86
 
87
87
  **Options:**
88
88
  1. **Review and refine** - Improve the document through structured self-review
89
- 2. **Proceed to planning** - Run `/workflows:plan` (will auto-detect this brainstorm)
89
+ 2. **Proceed to planning** - Invoke `/workflows:plan` as a prompt (will auto-detect this brainstorm)
90
90
  3. **Done for now** - Return later
91
91
 
92
92
  **If user selects "Review and refine":**
@@ -95,8 +95,8 @@ Load the `document-review` skill and apply it to the brainstorm document.
95
95
 
96
96
  When document-review returns "Review complete", present next steps:
97
97
 
98
- 1. **Move to planning** - Continue to `/workflows:plan` with this document
99
- 2. **Done for now** - Brainstorming complete. To start planning later: `/workflows:plan [document-path]`
98
+ 1. **Move to planning** - Continue by invoking `/workflows:plan` with this document
99
+ 2. **Done for now** - Brainstorming complete. To start planning later, invoke `/workflows:plan [document-path]`
100
100
 
101
101
  ## Output Summary
102
102
 
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ Key decisions:
111
111
  - [Decision 1]
112
112
  - [Decision 2]
113
113
 
114
- Next: Run `/workflows:plan` when ready to implement.
114
+ Next: Invoke `/workflows:plan` when ready to implement.
115
115
  ```
116
116
 
117
117
  ## Important Guidelines
@@ -497,24 +497,26 @@ After writing the plan file, use the **AskUserQuestion tool** to present these o
497
497
 
498
498
  **Options:**
499
499
  1. **Open plan in editor** - Open the plan file for review
500
- 2. **Run `/deepen-plan`** - Enhance each section with parallel research agents (best practices, performance, UI)
501
- 3. **Run `/technical_review`** - Technical feedback from code-focused reviewers (DHH, Kieran, Simplicity)
500
+ 2. **Use `/deepen-plan`** - Enhance each section with parallel research agents (best practices, performance, UI)
501
+ 3. **Use `/technical_review`** - Technical feedback from code-focused reviewers (DHH, Kieran, Simplicity)
502
502
  4. **Review and refine** - Improve the document through structured self-review
503
- 5. **Start `/workflows:work`** - Begin implementing this plan locally
504
- 6. **Start `/workflows:work` on remote** - Begin implementing in Claude Code on the web (use `&` to run in background)
503
+ 5. **Use `/workflows:work`** - Begin implementing this plan locally
504
+ 6. **Use `/workflows:work` on remote** - Begin implementing in Claude Code on the web (use `&` to run in background)
505
505
  7. **Create Issue** - Create issue in project tracker (GitHub/Linear)
506
506
 
507
507
  Based on selection:
508
508
  - **Open plan in editor** → Run `open docs/plans/<plan_filename>.md` to open the file in the user's default editor
509
- - **`/deepen-plan`** → Call the /deepen-plan command with the plan file path to enhance with research
510
- - **`/technical_review`** → Call the /technical_review command with the plan file path
509
+ - **`/deepen-plan`** → Run `pi --no-session -p "/deepen-plan docs/plans/<plan_filename>.md"` to enhance with research
510
+ - **`/technical_review`** → Run `pi --no-session -p "/technical_review docs/plans/<plan_filename>.md"`
511
511
  - **Review and refine** → Load `document-review` skill.
512
- - **`/workflows:work`** → Call the /workflows:work command with the plan file path
513
- - **`/workflows:work` on remote** → Run `/workflows:work docs/plans/<plan_filename>.md &` to start work in background for Claude Code web
512
+ - **`/workflows:work`** → Run `pi --no-session -p "/workflows:work docs/plans/<plan_filename>.md"`
513
+ - **`/workflows:work` on remote** → Run `pi --no-session -p "/workflows:work docs/plans/<plan_filename>.md" &` to start work in background
514
514
  - **Create Issue** → See "Issue Creation" section below
515
515
  - **Other** (automatically provided) → Accept free text for rework or specific changes
516
516
 
517
- **Note:** If running `/workflows:plan` with ultrathink enabled, automatically run `/deepen-plan` after plan creation for maximum depth and grounding.
517
+ **Important:** Slash commands (like `/deepen-plan`) are prompt templates, not shell executables. Never run `/...` directly via bash.
518
+
519
+ **Note:** If running `/workflows:plan` with ultrathink enabled, automatically run `/deepen-plan` after plan creation by invoking `pi --no-session -p "/deepen-plan docs/plans/<plan_filename>.md"`.
518
520
 
519
521
  Loop back to options after Simplify or Other changes until user selects `/workflows:work` or `/technical_review`.
520
522
 
@@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ After presenting the Summary Report, offer appropriate testing based on project
485
485
  Spawn a subagent to run browser tests (preserves main context):
486
486
 
487
487
  ```
488
- Task general-purpose("Run /test-browser for PR #[number]. Test all affected pages, check for console errors, handle failures by creating todos and fixing.")
488
+ Task general-purpose("Invoke `/test-browser` as a prompt for PR #[number]. Test all affected pages, check for console errors, handle failures by creating todos and fixing. Never run `/test-browser` directly via bash.")
489
489
  ```
490
490
 
491
491
  The subagent will:
@@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ The subagent will:
504
504
  Spawn a subagent to run Xcode tests (preserves main context):
505
505
 
506
506
  ```
507
- Task general-purpose("Run /xcode-test for scheme [name]. Build for simulator, install, launch, take screenshots, check for crashes.")
507
+ Task general-purpose("Invoke `/xcode-test` as a prompt for scheme [name]. Build for simulator, install, launch, take screenshots, check for crashes. Never run `/xcode-test` directly via bash.")
508
508
  ```
509
509
 
510
510
  The subagent will:
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ Work logs serve as:
186
186
  | Trigger | Flow | Tool |
187
187
  |---------|------|------|
188
188
  | Code review | `/workflows:review` → Findings → `/triage` → Todos | Review agent + skill |
189
- | PR comments | `/resolve_pr_parallel` → Individual fixes → Todos | gh CLI + skill |
189
+ | PR comments | `/resolve-pr-parallel` → Individual fixes → Todos | gh CLI + skill |
190
190
  | Code TODOs | `/resolve_todo_parallel` → Fixes + Complex todos | Agent + skill |
191
191
  | Planning | Brainstorm → Create todo → Work → Complete | Skill |
192
192
  | Feedback | Discussion → Create todo → Triage → Work | Skill + slash |
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
1
1
  ---
2
- name: resolve_pr_parallel
2
+ name: resolve-pr-parallel
3
3
  description: Resolve all PR comments using parallel processing. Use when addressing PR review feedback, resolving review threads, or batch-fixing PR comments.
4
4
  argument-hint: "[optional: PR number or current PR]"
5
5
  disable-model-invocation: true
@@ -479,18 +479,20 @@ After writing the enhanced plan, use the **ask_user_question tool** to present t
479
479
 
480
480
  **Options:**
481
481
  1. **View diff** - Show what was added/changed
482
- 2. **Run `/technical_review`** - Get feedback from reviewers on enhanced plan
483
- 3. **Start `/workflows-work`** - Begin implementing this enhanced plan
482
+ 2. **Use `/technical_review`** - Get feedback from reviewers on enhanced plan
483
+ 3. **Use `/workflows-work`** - Begin implementing this enhanced plan
484
484
  4. **Deepen further** - Run another round of research on specific sections
485
485
  5. **Revert** - Restore original plan (if backup exists)
486
486
 
487
487
  Based on selection:
488
488
  - **View diff** → Run `git diff [plan_path]` or show before/after
489
- - **`/technical_review`** → Call the /technical_review command with the plan file path
490
- - **`/workflows-work`** → Call the /workflows-work command with the plan file path
489
+ - **`/technical_review`** → Run `pi --no-session -p "/technical_review [plan_path]"`
490
+ - **`/workflows-work`** → Run `pi --no-session -p "/workflows-work [plan_path]"`
491
491
  - **Deepen further** → Ask which sections need more research, then re-run those agents
492
492
  - **Revert** → Restore from git or backup
493
493
 
494
+ **Important:** Slash commands (like `/workflows-work`) are Pi prompt templates, not shell executables. Never run `/...` directly via bash.
495
+
494
496
  ## Example Enhancement
495
497
 
496
498
  **Before (from /workflows-plan):**
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ Use **ask_user_question tool** to present next steps:
85
85
 
86
86
  **Options:**
87
87
  1. **Review and refine** - Improve the document through structured self-review
88
- 2. **Proceed to planning** - Run `/workflows-plan` (will auto-detect this brainstorm)
88
+ 2. **Proceed to planning** - Invoke `/workflows-plan` as a Pi prompt (will auto-detect this brainstorm)
89
89
  3. **Done for now** - Return later
90
90
 
91
91
  **If user selects "Review and refine":**
@@ -94,8 +94,8 @@ Load the `document-review` skill and apply it to the brainstorm document.
94
94
 
95
95
  When document-review returns "Review complete", present next steps:
96
96
 
97
- 1. **Move to planning** - Continue to `/workflows-plan` with this document
98
- 2. **Done for now** - Brainstorming complete. To start planning later: `/workflows-plan [document-path]`
97
+ 1. **Move to planning** - Continue by invoking `/workflows-plan` with this document
98
+ 2. **Done for now** - Brainstorming complete. To start planning later, invoke `/workflows-plan [document-path]` as a Pi prompt
99
99
 
100
100
  ## Output Summary
101
101
 
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ Key decisions:
110
110
  - [Decision 1]
111
111
  - [Decision 2]
112
112
 
113
- Next: Run `/workflows-plan` when ready to implement.
113
+ Next: Invoke `/workflows-plan` as a Pi prompt when ready to implement.
114
114
  ```
115
115
 
116
116
  ## Important Guidelines
@@ -496,24 +496,26 @@ After writing the plan file, use the **ask_user_question tool** to present these
496
496
 
497
497
  **Options:**
498
498
  1. **Open plan in editor** - Open the plan file for review
499
- 2. **Run `/deepen-plan`** - Enhance each section with parallel research agents (best practices, performance, UI)
500
- 3. **Run `/technical_review`** - Technical feedback from code-focused reviewers (DHH, Kieran, Simplicity)
499
+ 2. **Use `/deepen-plan`** - Enhance each section with parallel research agents (best practices, performance, UI)
500
+ 3. **Use `/technical_review`** - Technical feedback from code-focused reviewers (DHH, Kieran, Simplicity)
501
501
  4. **Review and refine** - Improve the document through structured self-review
502
- 5. **Start `/workflows-work`** - Begin implementing this plan locally
503
- 6. **Start `/workflows-work` on remote** - Begin implementing in Claude Code on the web (use `&` to run in background)
502
+ 5. **Use `/workflows-work`** - Begin implementing this plan locally
503
+ 6. **Use `/workflows-work` on remote** - Begin implementing in Claude Code on the web (use `&` to run in background)
504
504
  7. **Create Issue** - Create issue in project tracker (GitHub/Linear)
505
505
 
506
506
  Based on selection:
507
507
  - **Open plan in editor** → Run `open docs/plans/<plan_filename>.md` to open the file in the user's default editor
508
- - **`/deepen-plan`** → Call the /deepen-plan command with the plan file path to enhance with research
509
- - **`/technical_review`** → Call the /technical_review command with the plan file path
508
+ - **`/deepen-plan`** → Run `pi --no-session -p "/deepen-plan docs/plans/<plan_filename>.md"` to enhance with research
509
+ - **`/technical_review`** → Run `pi --no-session -p "/technical_review docs/plans/<plan_filename>.md"`
510
510
  - **Review and refine** → Load `document-review` skill.
511
- - **`/workflows-work`** → Call the /workflows-work command with the plan file path
512
- - **`/workflows-work` on remote** → Run `/workflows-work docs/plans/<plan_filename>.md &` to start work in background for Claude Code web
511
+ - **`/workflows-work`** → Run `pi --no-session -p "/workflows-work docs/plans/<plan_filename>.md"`
512
+ - **`/workflows-work` on remote** → Run `pi --no-session -p "/workflows-work docs/plans/<plan_filename>.md" &` to start work in background
513
513
  - **Create Issue** → See "Issue Creation" section below
514
514
  - **Other** (automatically provided) → Accept free text for rework or specific changes
515
515
 
516
- **Note:** If running `/workflows-plan` with ultrathink enabled, automatically run `/deepen-plan` after plan creation for maximum depth and grounding.
516
+ **Important:** Slash commands (like `/deepen-plan`) are Pi prompt templates, not shell executables. Never run `/...` directly via bash.
517
+
518
+ **Note:** If running `/workflows-plan` with ultrathink enabled, automatically run `/deepen-plan` after plan creation by invoking `pi --no-session -p "/deepen-plan docs/plans/<plan_filename>.md"`.
517
519
 
518
520
  Loop back to options after Simplify or Other changes until user selects `/workflows-work` or `/technical_review`.
519
521
 
@@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ After presenting the Summary Report, offer appropriate testing based on project
484
484
  Spawn a subagent to run browser tests (preserves main context):
485
485
 
486
486
  ```
487
- Run subagent with agent="general-purpose" and task=""Run /test-browser for PR #[number]. Test all affected pages, check for console errors, handle failures by creating todos and fixing."".
487
+ Run subagent with agent="general-purpose" and task=""Invoke `/test-browser` as a Pi prompt for PR #[number]. Test all affected pages, check for console errors, handle failures by creating todos and fixing. Never run `/test-browser` directly via bash."".
488
488
  ```
489
489
 
490
490
  The subagent will:
@@ -503,7 +503,7 @@ The subagent will:
503
503
  Spawn a subagent to run Xcode tests (preserves main context):
504
504
 
505
505
  ```
506
- Run subagent with agent="general-purpose" and task=""Run /xcode-test for scheme [name]. Build for simulator, install, launch, take screenshots, check for crashes."".
506
+ Run subagent with agent="general-purpose" and task=""Invoke `/xcode-test` as a Pi prompt for scheme [name]. Build for simulator, install, launch, take screenshots, check for crashes. Never run `/xcode-test` directly via bash."".
507
507
  ```
508
508
 
509
509
  The subagent will:
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ Work logs serve as:
186
186
  | Trigger | Flow | Tool |
187
187
  |---------|------|------|
188
188
  | Code review | `/workflows:review` → Findings → `/triage` → Todos | Review agent + skill |
189
- | PR comments | `/resolve_pr_parallel` → Individual fixes → Todos | gh CLI + skill |
189
+ | PR comments | `/resolve-pr-parallel` → Individual fixes → Todos | gh CLI + skill |
190
190
  | Code TODOs | `/resolve_todo_parallel` → Fixes + Complex todos | Agent + skill |
191
191
  | Planning | Brainstorm → Create todo → Work → Complete | Skill |
192
192
  | Feedback | Discussion → Create todo → Triage → Work | Skill + slash |
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
1
1
  ---
2
- name: resolve_pr_parallel
2
+ name: resolve-pr-parallel
3
3
  description: Resolve all PR comments using parallel processing. Use when addressing PR review feedback, resolving review threads, or batch-fixing PR comments.
4
4
  argument-hint: "[optional: PR number or current PR]"
5
5
  disable-model-invocation: true
@@ -127,6 +127,36 @@ function transformContentForPi(body: string): string {
127
127
  return `/${normalizeName(withoutPrefix)}`
128
128
  })
129
129
 
130
+ result = rewriteSlashCommandExecutionForPi(result)
131
+
132
+ return result
133
+ }
134
+
135
+ function rewriteSlashCommandExecutionForPi(body: string): string {
136
+ let result = body
137
+
138
+ result = result.replace(/Call the \/([a-z][a-z0-9_-]*) command/gi, (_match, commandName: string) => {
139
+ return `Invoke \`/${commandName}\` as a Pi prompt (never as a direct bash command)`
140
+ })
141
+
142
+ result = result.replace(/Run `\/([a-z][a-z0-9_-]*)([^`]*)`/gi, (_match, commandName: string, rawArgs: string) => {
143
+ let args = (rawArgs ?? "").trim()
144
+ let backgroundSuffix = ""
145
+
146
+ if (args.endsWith("&")) {
147
+ args = args.slice(0, -1).trimEnd()
148
+ backgroundSuffix = " &"
149
+ }
150
+
151
+ const prompt = args.length > 0 ? `/${commandName} ${args}` : `/${commandName}`
152
+ const escapedPrompt = prompt.replace(/"/g, '\\"')
153
+ return `Run \`pi --no-session -p "${escapedPrompt}"${backgroundSuffix}\``
154
+ })
155
+
156
+ if (result !== body && !result.includes("Slash commands are Pi prompt templates")) {
157
+ result += "\n\n**Important:** Slash commands are Pi prompt templates, not shell executables. Never run `/...` directly via bash."
158
+ }
159
+
130
160
  return result
131
161
  }
132
162