compact-agent 1.10.1 → 1.11.1

package/resources/ecc/commands/auto-update.md

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+---
+description: Pull the latest ECC repo changes and reinstall the current managed targets.
+disable-model-invocation: true
+---
+
+# Auto Update
+
+Update ECC from its upstream repo and regenerate the current context's managed install using the original install-state request.
+
+## Usage
+
+```bash
+# Preview the update without mutating anything
+ECC_ROOT="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$(node -e "var r=(()=>{var e=process.env.CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT;if(e&&e.trim())return e.trim();var p=require('path'),f=require('fs'),h=require('os').homedir(),d=p.join(h,'.claude'),q=p.join('scripts','lib','utils.js');if(f.existsSync(p.join(d,q)))return d;for(var s of [['ecc'],['ecc@ecc'],['marketplace','ecc'],['everything-claude-code'],['everything-claude-code@everything-claude-code'],['marketplace','everything-claude-code']]){var l=p.join(d,'plugins',...s);if(f.existsSync(p.join(l,q)))return l}try{for(var g of ['ecc','everything-claude-code']){var b=p.join(d,'plugins','cache',g);for(var o of f.readdirSync(b,{withFileTypes:true})){if(!o.isDirectory())continue;for(var v of f.readdirSync(p.join(b,o.name),{withFileTypes:true})){if(!v.isDirectory())continue;var c=p.join(b,o.name,v.name);if(f.existsSync(p.join(c,q)))return c}}}}catch(x){}return d})();console.log(r)")}"
+node "$ECC_ROOT/scripts/auto-update.js" --dry-run
+
+# Update only Cursor-managed files in the current project
+node "$ECC_ROOT/scripts/auto-update.js" --target cursor
+
+# Override the ECC repo root explicitly
+node "$ECC_ROOT/scripts/auto-update.js" --repo-root /path/to/everything-claude-code
+```
+
+## Notes
+
+- This command uses the recorded install-state request and reruns `install-apply.js` after pulling the latest repo changes.
+- Reinstall is intentional: it handles upstream renames and deletions that `repair.js` cannot safely reconstruct from stale operations alone.
+- Use `--dry-run` first if you want to see the reconstructed reinstall plan before mutating anything.

package/resources/ecc/commands/build-fix.md

@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+---
+description: Detect the project build system and incrementally fix build/type errors with minimal safe changes.
+---
+
+# Build and Fix
+
+Incrementally fix build and type errors with minimal, safe changes.
+
+## Step 1: Detect Build System
+
+Identify the project's build tool and run the build:
+
+| Indicator | Build Command |
+|-----------|---------------|
+| `package.json` with `build` script | `npm run build` or `pnpm build` |
+| `tsconfig.json` (TypeScript only) | `npx tsc --noEmit` |
+| `Cargo.toml` | `cargo build 2>&1` |
+| `pom.xml` | `mvn compile` |
+| `build.gradle` | `./gradlew compileJava` |
+| `go.mod` | `go build ./...` |
+| `pyproject.toml` | `python -m compileall -q .` or `mypy .` |
+
+## Step 2: Parse and Group Errors
+
+1. Run the build command and capture stderr
+2. Group errors by file path
+3. Sort by dependency order (fix imports/types before logic errors)
+4. Count total errors for progress tracking
+
+## Step 3: Fix Loop (One Error at a Time)
+
+For each error:
+
+1. **Read the file** — Use Read tool to see error context (10 lines around the error)
+2. **Diagnose** — Identify root cause (missing import, wrong type, syntax error)
+3. **Fix minimally** — Use Edit tool for the smallest change that resolves the error
+4. **Re-run build** — Verify the error is gone and no new errors introduced
+5. **Move to next** — Continue with remaining errors
+
+## Step 4: Guardrails
+
+Stop and ask the user if:
+- A fix introduces **more errors than it resolves**
+- The **same error persists after 3 attempts** (likely a deeper issue)
+- The fix requires **architectural changes** (not just a build fix)
+- Build errors stem from **missing dependencies** (need `npm install`, `cargo add`, etc.)
+
+## Step 5: Summary
+
+Show results:
+- Errors fixed (with file paths)
+- Errors remaining (if any)
+- New errors introduced (should be zero)
+- Suggested next steps for unresolved issues
+
+## Recovery Strategies
+
+| Situation | Action |
+|-----------|--------|
+| Missing module/import | Check if package is installed; suggest install command |
+| Type mismatch | Read both type definitions; fix the narrower type |
+| Circular dependency | Identify cycle with import graph; suggest extraction |
+| Version conflict | Check `package.json` / `Cargo.toml` for version constraints |
+| Build tool misconfiguration | Read config file; compare with working defaults |
+
+Fix one error at a time for safety. Prefer minimal diffs over refactoring.

package/resources/ecc/commands/checkpoint.md

@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+---
+description: Create, verify, or list workflow checkpoints after running verification checks.
+---
+
+# Checkpoint Command
+
+Create or verify a checkpoint in your workflow.
+
+## Usage
+
+`/checkpoint [create|verify|list] [name]`
+
+## Create Checkpoint
+
+When creating a checkpoint:
+
+1. Run `/verify quick` to ensure current state is clean
+2. Create a git stash or commit with checkpoint name
+3. Log checkpoint to `.claude/checkpoints.log`:
+
+```bash
+echo "$(date +%Y-%m-%d-%H:%M) | $CHECKPOINT_NAME | $(git rev-parse --short HEAD)" >> .claude/checkpoints.log
+```
+
+4. Report checkpoint created
+
+## Verify Checkpoint
+
+When verifying against a checkpoint:
+
+1. Read checkpoint from log
+2. Compare current state to checkpoint:
+   - Files added since checkpoint
+   - Files modified since checkpoint
+   - Test pass rate now vs then
+   - Coverage now vs then
+
+3. Report:
+```
+CHECKPOINT COMPARISON: $NAME
+============================
+Files changed: X
+Tests: +Y passed / -Z failed
+Coverage: +X% / -Y%
+Build: [PASS/FAIL]
+```
+
+## List Checkpoints
+
+Show all checkpoints with:
+- Name
+- Timestamp
+- Git SHA
+- Status (current, behind, ahead)
+
+## Workflow
+
+Typical checkpoint flow:
+
+```
+[Start] --> /checkpoint create "feature-start"
+   |
+[Implement] --> /checkpoint create "core-done"
+   |
+[Test] --> /checkpoint verify "core-done"
+   |
+[Refactor] --> /checkpoint create "refactor-done"
+   |
+[PR] --> /checkpoint verify "feature-start"
+```
+
+## Arguments
+
+$ARGUMENTS:
+- `create <name>` - Create named checkpoint
+- `verify <name>` - Verify against named checkpoint
+- `list` - Show all checkpoints
+- `clear` - Remove old checkpoints (keeps last 5)

package/resources/ecc/commands/code-review.md

@@ -0,0 +1,289 @@
+---
+description: Code review — local uncommitted changes or GitHub PR (pass PR number/URL for PR mode)
+argument-hint: [pr-number | pr-url | blank for local review]
+---
+
+# Code Review
+
+> PR review mode adapted from PRPs-agentic-eng by Wirasm. Part of the PRP workflow series.
+
+**Input**: $ARGUMENTS
+
+---
+
+## Mode Selection
+
+If `$ARGUMENTS` contains a PR number, PR URL, or `--pr`:
+→ Jump to **PR Review Mode** below.
+
+Otherwise:
+→ Use **Local Review Mode**.
+
+---
+
+## Local Review Mode
+
+Comprehensive security and quality review of uncommitted changes.
+
+### Phase 1 — GATHER
+
+```bash
+git diff --name-only HEAD
+```
+
+If no changed files, stop: "Nothing to review."
+
+### Phase 2 — REVIEW
+
+Read each changed file in full. Check for:
+
+**Security Issues (CRITICAL):**
+- Hardcoded credentials, API keys, tokens
+- SQL injection vulnerabilities
+- XSS vulnerabilities
+- Missing input validation
+- Insecure dependencies
+- Path traversal risks
+
+**Code Quality (HIGH):**
+- Functions > 50 lines
+- Files > 800 lines
+- Nesting depth > 4 levels
+- Missing error handling
+- console.log statements
+- TODO/FIXME comments
+- Missing JSDoc for public APIs
+
+**Best Practices (MEDIUM):**
+- Mutation patterns (use immutable instead)
+- Emoji usage in code/comments
+- Missing tests for new code
+- Accessibility issues (a11y)
+
+### Phase 3 — REPORT
+
+Generate report with:
+- Severity: CRITICAL, HIGH, MEDIUM, LOW
+- File location and line numbers
+- Issue description
+- Suggested fix
+
+Block commit if CRITICAL or HIGH issues found.
+Never approve code with security vulnerabilities.
+
+---
+
+## PR Review Mode
+
+Comprehensive GitHub PR review — fetches diff, reads full files, runs validation, posts review.
+
+### Phase 1 — FETCH
+
+Parse input to determine PR:
+
+| Input | Action |
+|---|---|
+| Number (e.g. `42`) | Use as PR number |
+| URL (`github.com/.../pull/42`) | Extract PR number |
+| Branch name | Find PR via `gh pr list --head <branch>` |
+
+```bash
+gh pr view <NUMBER> --json number,title,body,author,baseRefName,headRefName,changedFiles,additions,deletions
+gh pr diff <NUMBER>
+```
+
+If PR not found, stop with error. Store PR metadata for later phases.
+
+### Phase 2 — CONTEXT
+
+Build review context:
+
+1. **Project rules** — Read `CLAUDE.md`, `.claude/docs/`, and any contributing guidelines
+2. **Planning artifacts** — Check `.claude/prds/`, `.claude/plans/`, `.claude/reviews/`, and legacy `.claude/PRPs/{prds,plans,reports,reviews}/` for context related to this PR
+3. **PR intent** — Parse PR description for goals, linked issues, test plans
+4. **Changed files** — List all modified files and categorize by type (source, test, config, docs)
+
+### Phase 3 — REVIEW
+
+Read each changed file **in full** (not just the diff hunks — you need surrounding context).
+
+For PR reviews, fetch the full file contents at the PR head revision:
+```bash
+gh pr diff <NUMBER> --name-only | while IFS= read -r file; do
+  gh api "repos/{owner}/{repo}/contents/$file?ref=<head-branch>" --jq '.content' | base64 -d
+done
+```
+
+Apply the review checklist across 7 categories:
+
+| Category | What to Check |
+|---|---|
+| **Correctness** | Logic errors, off-by-ones, null handling, edge cases, race conditions |
+| **Type Safety** | Type mismatches, unsafe casts, `any` usage, missing generics |
+| **Pattern Compliance** | Matches project conventions (naming, file structure, error handling, imports) |
+| **Security** | Injection, auth gaps, secret exposure, SSRF, path traversal, XSS |
+| **Performance** | N+1 queries, missing indexes, unbounded loops, memory leaks, large payloads |
+| **Completeness** | Missing tests, missing error handling, incomplete migrations, missing docs |
+| **Maintainability** | Dead code, magic numbers, deep nesting, unclear naming, missing types |
+
+Assign severity to each finding:
+
+| Severity | Meaning | Action |
+|---|---|---|
+| **CRITICAL** | Security vulnerability or data loss risk | Must fix before merge |
+| **HIGH** | Bug or logic error likely to cause issues | Should fix before merge |
+| **MEDIUM** | Code quality issue or missing best practice | Fix recommended |
+| **LOW** | Style nit or minor suggestion | Optional |
+
+### Phase 4 — VALIDATE
+
+Run available validation commands:
+
+Detect the project type from config files (`package.json`, `Cargo.toml`, `go.mod`, `pyproject.toml`, etc.), then run the appropriate commands:
+
+**Node.js / TypeScript** (has `package.json`):
+```bash
+npm run typecheck 2>/dev/null || npx tsc --noEmit 2>/dev/null  # Type check
+npm run lint                                                    # Lint
+npm test                                                        # Tests
+npm run build                                                   # Build
+```
+
+**Rust** (has `Cargo.toml`):
+```bash
+cargo clippy -- -D warnings  # Lint
+cargo test                   # Tests
+cargo build                  # Build
+```
+
+**Go** (has `go.mod`):
+```bash
+go vet ./...    # Lint
+go test ./...   # Tests
+go build ./...  # Build
+```
+
+**Python** (has `pyproject.toml` / `setup.py`):
+```bash
+pytest  # Tests
+```
+
+Run only the commands that apply to the detected project type. Record pass/fail for each.
+
+### Phase 5 — DECIDE
+
+Form recommendation based on findings:
+
+| Condition | Decision |
+|---|---|
+| Zero CRITICAL/HIGH issues, validation passes | **APPROVE** |
+| Only MEDIUM/LOW issues, validation passes | **APPROVE** with comments |
+| Any HIGH issues or validation failures | **REQUEST CHANGES** |
+| Any CRITICAL issues | **BLOCK** — must fix before merge |
+
+Special cases:
+- Draft PR → Always use **COMMENT** (not approve/block)
+- Only docs/config changes → Lighter review, focus on correctness
+- Explicit `--approve` or `--request-changes` flag → Override decision (but still report all findings)
+
+### Phase 6 — REPORT
+
+Create review artifact at `.claude/reviews/pr-<NUMBER>-review.md` unless the repo already uses legacy `.claude/PRPs/reviews/` for this workstream:
+
+```markdown
+# PR Review: #<NUMBER> — <TITLE>
+
+**Reviewed**: <date>
+**Author**: <author>
+**Branch**: <head> → <base>
+**Decision**: APPROVE | REQUEST CHANGES | BLOCK
+
+## Summary
+<1-2 sentence overall assessment>
+
+## Findings
+
+### CRITICAL
+<findings or "None">
+
+### HIGH
+<findings or "None">
+
+### MEDIUM
+<findings or "None">
+
+### LOW
+<findings or "None">
+
+## Validation Results
+
+| Check | Result |
+|---|---|
+| Type check | Pass / Fail / Skipped |
+| Lint | Pass / Fail / Skipped |
+| Tests | Pass / Fail / Skipped |
+| Build | Pass / Fail / Skipped |
+
+## Files Reviewed
+<list of files with change type: Added/Modified/Deleted>
+```
+
+### Phase 7 — PUBLISH
+
+Post the review to GitHub:
+
+```bash
+# If APPROVE
+gh pr review <NUMBER> --approve --body "<summary of review>"
+
+# If REQUEST CHANGES
+gh pr review <NUMBER> --request-changes --body "<summary with required fixes>"
+
+# If COMMENT only (draft PR or informational)
+gh pr review <NUMBER> --comment --body "<summary>"
+```
+
+For inline comments on specific lines, use the GitHub review comments API:
+```bash
+gh api "repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/<NUMBER>/comments" \
+  -f body="<comment>" \
+  -f path="<file>" \
+  -F line=<line-number> \
+  -f side="RIGHT" \
+  -f commit_id="$(gh pr view <NUMBER> --json headRefOid --jq .headRefOid)"
+```
+
+Alternatively, post a single review with multiple inline comments at once:
+```bash
+gh api "repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/<NUMBER>/reviews" \
+  -f event="COMMENT" \
+  -f body="<overall summary>" \
+  --input comments.json  # [{"path": "file", "line": N, "body": "comment"}, ...]
+```
+
+### Phase 8 — OUTPUT
+
+Report to user:
+
+```
+PR #<NUMBER>: <TITLE>
+Decision: <APPROVE|REQUEST_CHANGES|BLOCK>
+
+Issues: <critical_count> critical, <high_count> high, <medium_count> medium, <low_count> low
+Validation: <pass_count>/<total_count> checks passed
+
+Artifacts:
+  Review: .claude/reviews/pr-<NUMBER>-review.md
+  GitHub: <PR URL>
+
+Next steps:
+  - <contextual suggestions based on decision>
+```
+
+---
+
+## Edge Cases
+
+- **No `gh` CLI**: Fall back to local-only review (read the diff, skip GitHub publish). Warn user.
+- **Diverged branches**: Suggest `git fetch origin && git rebase origin/<base>` before review.
+- **Large PRs (>50 files)**: Warn about review scope. Focus on source changes first, then tests, then config/docs.

package/resources/ecc/commands/cost-report.md

@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+---
+description: Generate a local Claude Code cost report from a cost-tracker SQLite database.
+argument-hint: [csv]
+---
+
+# Cost Report
+
+Query the local cost-tracking database and present a spending report by day,
+project, tool, and session. This command assumes a cost-tracking hook or plugin
+is already writing usage rows to `~/.claude-cost-tracker/usage.db`.
+
+## What This Command Does
+
+1. Check that `sqlite3` is available.
+2. Check that `~/.claude-cost-tracker/usage.db` exists.
+3. Run aggregate queries against the `usage` table.
+4. Present a compact report, or export recent rows as CSV when the argument is
+   `csv`.
+
+## Prerequisites
+
+The database must be populated by a local cost tracker. If the file is missing,
+tell the user the tracker is not set up and suggest installing or enabling a
+trusted Claude Code cost-tracking hook/plugin first.
+
+```bash
+test -f ~/.claude-cost-tracker/usage.db && echo "Database found" || echo "Database not found"
+```
+
+## Summary Query
+
+```bash
+sqlite3 -header -column ~/.claude-cost-tracker/usage.db "
+  SELECT
+    ROUND(COALESCE(SUM(CASE WHEN date(timestamp) = date('now') THEN cost_usd END), 0), 4) AS today_cost,
+    ROUND(COALESCE(SUM(CASE WHEN date(timestamp) = date('now', '-1 day') THEN cost_usd END), 0), 4) AS yesterday_cost,
+    ROUND(COALESCE(SUM(cost_usd), 0), 4) AS total_cost,
+    COUNT(*) AS total_calls,
+    COUNT(DISTINCT session_id) AS sessions
+  FROM usage;
+"
+```
+
+## Project Breakdown
+
+```bash
+sqlite3 -header -column ~/.claude-cost-tracker/usage.db "
+  SELECT project, ROUND(SUM(cost_usd), 4) AS cost, COUNT(*) AS calls
+  FROM usage
+  GROUP BY project
+  ORDER BY cost DESC;
+"
+```
+
+## Tool Breakdown
+
+```bash
+sqlite3 -header -column ~/.claude-cost-tracker/usage.db "
+  SELECT tool_name, ROUND(SUM(cost_usd), 4) AS cost, COUNT(*) AS calls
+  FROM usage
+  GROUP BY tool_name
+  ORDER BY cost DESC;
+"
+```
+
+## Last Seven Days
+
+```bash
+sqlite3 -header -column ~/.claude-cost-tracker/usage.db "
+  SELECT date(timestamp) AS date, ROUND(SUM(cost_usd), 4) AS cost, COUNT(*) AS calls
+  FROM usage
+  GROUP BY date(timestamp)
+  ORDER BY date DESC
+  LIMIT 7;
+"
+```
+
+## CSV Export
+
+If the user asks for `/cost-report csv`, export the most recent usage rows with
+an explicit column list:
+
+```bash
+sqlite3 -csv -header ~/.claude-cost-tracker/usage.db "
+  SELECT timestamp, project, tool_name, input_tokens, output_tokens, cost_usd, session_id, model
+  FROM usage
+  ORDER BY timestamp DESC
+  LIMIT 100;
+"
+```
+
+## Report Format
+
+Format the response as:
+
+1. Summary: today, yesterday, total, calls, sessions.
+2. By project: projects ranked by total cost.
+3. By tool: tools ranked by total cost.
+4. Last seven days: date, cost, call count.
+
+Use four decimal places for sub-dollar amounts. Do not estimate pricing from raw
+tokens in this command; rely on the precomputed `cost_usd` values written by the
+tracker.
+
+## Source
+
+Salvaged from stale community PR #1304 by `MayurBhavsar`.