cokit-cli 1.0.9 → 1.2.2

package/skills/context-engineering/scripts/compression_evaluator.py

@@ -0,0 +1,349 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python3
+"""
+Compression Evaluator - Evaluate compression quality with probe-based testing.
+
+Usage:
+    python compression_evaluator.py evaluate <original_file> <compressed_file>
+    python compression_evaluator.py generate-probes <context_file>
+"""
+
+import argparse
+import json
+import os
+import re
+import sys
+from dataclasses import dataclass, field
+from enum import Enum
+from typing import Optional
+
+MAX_FILE_SIZE_MB = 100
+
+
+def load_file(path: str, as_json: bool = True):
+    """Load file with proper error handling and size validation."""
+    try:
+        size_mb = os.path.getsize(path) / (1024 * 1024)
+        if size_mb > MAX_FILE_SIZE_MB:
+            print(f"Error: File too large ({size_mb:.1f}MB). Max {MAX_FILE_SIZE_MB}MB", file=sys.stderr)
+            sys.exit(1)
+        with open(path, encoding='utf-8') as f:
+            return json.load(f) if as_json else f.read()
+    except FileNotFoundError:
+        print(f"Error: File not found: {path}", file=sys.stderr)
+        sys.exit(1)
+    except PermissionError:
+        print(f"Error: Permission denied: {path}", file=sys.stderr)
+        sys.exit(1)
+    except json.JSONDecodeError as e:
+        print(f"Error: Invalid JSON in {path}: {e}", file=sys.stderr)
+        sys.exit(1)
+
+
+class ProbeType(Enum):
+    RECALL = "recall"           # Factual retention
+    ARTIFACT = "artifact"       # File tracking
+    CONTINUATION = "continuation"  # Task planning
+    DECISION = "decision"       # Reasoning chains
+
+
+@dataclass
+class Probe:
+    type: ProbeType
+    question: str
+    ground_truth: str
+    context_reference: Optional[str] = None
+
+
+@dataclass
+class ProbeResult:
+    probe: Probe
+    response: str
+    scores: dict
+    overall_score: float
+
+
+@dataclass
+class EvaluationReport:
+    compression_ratio: float
+    quality_score: float
+    dimension_scores: dict
+    probe_results: list
+    recommendations: list = field(default_factory=list)
+
+
+# Six evaluation dimensions with weights
+DIMENSIONS = {
+    "accuracy": {"weight": 0.20, "description": "Technical correctness"},
+    "context_awareness": {"weight": 0.15, "description": "Conversation state"},
+    "artifact_trail": {"weight": 0.20, "description": "File tracking"},
+    "completeness": {"weight": 0.20, "description": "Coverage and depth"},
+    "continuity": {"weight": 0.15, "description": "Work continuation"},
+    "instruction_following": {"weight": 0.10, "description": "Constraint adherence"}
+}
+
+
+def estimate_tokens(text: str) -> int:
+    """Estimate token count."""
+    return len(text) // 4
+
+
+def extract_facts(messages: list) -> list:
+    """Extract factual statements that can be probed."""
+    facts = []
+    patterns = [
+        (r"error[:\s]+([^.]+)", "error"),
+        (r"next step[s]?[:\s]+([^.]+)", "next_step"),
+        (r"decided to\s+([^.]+)", "decision"),
+        (r"implemented\s+([^.]+)", "implementation"),
+        (r"found that\s+([^.]+)", "finding")
+    ]
+
+    for msg in messages:
+        content = str(msg.get("content", "") if isinstance(msg, dict) else msg)
+        for pattern, fact_type in patterns:
+            matches = re.findall(pattern, content, re.IGNORECASE)
+            for match in matches:
+                facts.append({"type": fact_type, "content": match.strip()})
+    return facts
+
+
+def extract_files(messages: list) -> list:
+    """Extract file references."""
+    files = []
+    patterns = [
+        r"(?:created|modified|updated|edited|read)\s+[`'\"]?([a-zA-Z0-9_/.-]+\.[a-zA-Z]+)[`'\"]?",
+        r"file[:\s]+[`'\"]?([a-zA-Z0-9_/.-]+\.[a-zA-Z]+)[`'\"]?"
+    ]
+
+    for msg in messages:
+        content = str(msg.get("content", "") if isinstance(msg, dict) else msg)
+        for pattern in patterns:
+            matches = re.findall(pattern, content)
+            files.extend(matches)
+    return list(set(files))
+
+
+def extract_decisions(messages: list) -> list:
+    """Extract decision points."""
+    decisions = []
+    patterns = [
+        r"chose\s+([^.]+)\s+(?:because|since|over)",
+        r"decided\s+(?:to\s+)?([^.]+)",
+        r"went with\s+([^.]+)"
+    ]
+
+    for msg in messages:
+        content = str(msg.get("content", "") if isinstance(msg, dict) else msg)
+        for pattern in patterns:
+            matches = re.findall(pattern, content, re.IGNORECASE)
+            decisions.extend(matches)
+    return decisions
+
+
+def generate_probes(messages: list) -> list:
+    """Generate probe set for evaluation."""
+    probes = []
+
+    # Recall probes from facts
+    facts = extract_facts(messages)
+    for fact in facts[:3]:  # Limit to 3 recall probes
+        probes.append(Probe(
+            type=ProbeType.RECALL,
+            question=f"What was the {fact['type'].replace('_', ' ')}?",
+            ground_truth=fact["content"]
+        ))
+
+    # Artifact probes from files
+    files = extract_files(messages)
+    if files:
+        probes.append(Probe(
+            type=ProbeType.ARTIFACT,
+            question="Which files have been modified or created?",
+            ground_truth=", ".join(files)
+        ))
+
+    # Continuation probe
+    probes.append(Probe(
+        type=ProbeType.CONTINUATION,
+        question="What should be done next?",
+        ground_truth="[Extracted from context]"  # Would need LLM to generate
+    ))
+
+    # Decision probes
+    decisions = extract_decisions(messages)
+    for decision in decisions[:2]:  # Limit to 2 decision probes
+        probes.append(Probe(
+            type=ProbeType.DECISION,
+            question=f"Why was the decision made to {decision[:50]}...?",
+            ground_truth=decision
+        ))
+
+    return probes
+
+
+def evaluate_response(probe: Probe, response: str) -> dict:
+    """
+    Evaluate response against probe.
+    Note: Production should use LLM-as-Judge.
+    """
+    scores = {}
+    response_lower = response.lower()
+    ground_truth_lower = probe.ground_truth.lower()
+
+    # Heuristic scoring (replace with LLM evaluation in production)
+    # Check for ground truth presence
+    if ground_truth_lower in response_lower:
+        base_score = 1.0
+    elif any(word in response_lower for word in ground_truth_lower.split()[:3]):
+        base_score = 0.6
+    else:
+        base_score = 0.3
+
+    # Adjust based on probe type
+    if probe.type == ProbeType.ARTIFACT:
+        # Check file mentions
+        files_mentioned = len(re.findall(r'\.[a-z]+', response_lower))
+        scores["artifact_trail"] = min(1.0, base_score + files_mentioned * 0.1)
+        scores["accuracy"] = base_score
+    elif probe.type == ProbeType.RECALL:
+        scores["accuracy"] = base_score
+        scores["completeness"] = base_score
+    elif probe.type == ProbeType.CONTINUATION:
+        scores["continuity"] = base_score
+        scores["context_awareness"] = base_score
+    elif probe.type == ProbeType.DECISION:
+        scores["accuracy"] = base_score
+        scores["context_awareness"] = base_score
+
+    return scores
+
+
+def calculate_compression_ratio(original: str, compressed: str) -> float:
+    """Calculate compression ratio."""
+    original_tokens = estimate_tokens(original)
+    compressed_tokens = estimate_tokens(compressed)
+    if original_tokens == 0:
+        return 0.0
+    return 1.0 - (compressed_tokens / original_tokens)
+
+
+def evaluate_compression(original_messages: list, compressed_text: str,
+                         probes: Optional[list] = None) -> EvaluationReport:
+    """
+    Evaluate compression quality.
+
+    Args:
+        original_messages: Original context messages
+        compressed_text: Compressed summary
+        probes: Optional pre-generated probes
+
+    Returns:
+        EvaluationReport with scores and recommendations
+    """
+    # Generate probes if not provided
+    if probes is None:
+        probes = generate_probes(original_messages)
+
+    # Calculate compression ratio
+    original_text = json.dumps(original_messages)
+    compression_ratio = calculate_compression_ratio(original_text, compressed_text)
+
+    # Evaluate each probe (simulated - production uses LLM)
+    probe_results = []
+    dimension_scores = {dim: [] for dim in DIMENSIONS}
+
+    for probe in probes:
+        # In production, send compressed_text + probe.question to LLM
+        # Here we simulate with heuristic check
+        scores = evaluate_response(probe, compressed_text)
+
+        overall = sum(scores.values()) / len(scores) if scores else 0
+        probe_results.append(ProbeResult(
+            probe=probe,
+            response="[Would be LLM response]",
+            scores=scores,
+            overall_score=overall
+        ))
+
+        # Aggregate by dimension
+        for dim, score in scores.items():
+            if dim in dimension_scores:
+                dimension_scores[dim].append(score)
+
+    # Calculate dimension averages
+    avg_dimensions = {}
+    for dim, scores in dimension_scores.items():
+        avg_dimensions[dim] = sum(scores) / len(scores) if scores else 0.5
+
+    # Calculate weighted quality score
+    quality_score = sum(
+        avg_dimensions.get(dim, 0.5) * info["weight"]
+        for dim, info in DIMENSIONS.items()
+    )
+
+    # Generate recommendations
+    recommendations = []
+    if compression_ratio > 0.99:
+        recommendations.append("Very high compression. Risk of information loss.")
+    if avg_dimensions.get("artifact_trail", 1) < 0.5:
+        recommendations.append("Artifact tracking weak. Add explicit file section to summary.")
+    if avg_dimensions.get("continuity", 1) < 0.5:
+        recommendations.append("Continuity low. Add 'Next Steps' section to summary.")
+    if quality_score < 0.6:
+        recommendations.append("Quality below threshold. Consider less aggressive compression.")
+
+    return EvaluationReport(
+        compression_ratio=compression_ratio,
+        quality_score=quality_score,
+        dimension_scores=avg_dimensions,
+        probe_results=probe_results,
+        recommendations=recommendations
+    )
+
+
+def main():
+    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="Compression quality evaluator")
+    subparsers = parser.add_subparsers(dest="command", required=True)
+
+    # Evaluate command
+    eval_parser = subparsers.add_parser("evaluate", help="Evaluate compression quality")
+    eval_parser.add_argument("original_file", help="JSON file with original messages")
+    eval_parser.add_argument("compressed_file", help="Text file with compressed summary")
+
+    # Generate probes command
+    probe_parser = subparsers.add_parser("generate-probes", help="Generate evaluation probes")
+    probe_parser.add_argument("context_file", help="JSON file with context messages")
+
+    args = parser.parse_args()
+
+    if args.command == "evaluate":
+        original = load_file(args.original_file, as_json=True)
+        messages = original if isinstance(original, list) else original.get("messages", [])
+        compressed = load_file(args.compressed_file, as_json=False)
+
+        report = evaluate_compression(messages, compressed)
+        print(json.dumps({
+            "compression_ratio": f"{report.compression_ratio:.1%}",
+            "quality_score": f"{report.quality_score:.2f}",
+            "dimension_scores": {k: f"{v:.2f}" for k, v in report.dimension_scores.items()},
+            "probe_count": len(report.probe_results),
+            "recommendations": report.recommendations
+        }, indent=2))
+
+    elif args.command == "generate-probes":
+        data = load_file(args.context_file, as_json=True)
+        messages = data if isinstance(data, list) else data.get("messages", [])
+
+        probes = generate_probes(messages)
+        output = []
+        for probe in probes:
+            output.append({
+                "type": probe.type.value,
+                "question": probe.question,
+                "ground_truth": probe.ground_truth
+            })
+        print(json.dumps(output, indent=2))
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    main()

package/skills/context-engineering/scripts/context_analyzer.py

@@ -0,0 +1,317 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python3
+"""
+Context Analyzer - Health analysis and degradation detection for agent contexts.
+
+Usage:
+    python context_analyzer.py analyze <context_file>
+    python context_analyzer.py budget --system 2000 --tools 1500 --docs 3000 --history 5000
+"""
+
+import argparse
+import json
+import math
+import os
+import re
+import sys
+from dataclasses import dataclass, field
+from enum import Enum
+from typing import Optional
+
+MAX_FILE_SIZE_MB = 100
+
+
+def load_json_file(path: str):
+    """Load JSON file with proper error handling and size validation."""
+    try:
+        size_mb = os.path.getsize(path) / (1024 * 1024)
+        if size_mb > MAX_FILE_SIZE_MB:
+            print(f"Error: File too large ({size_mb:.1f}MB). Max {MAX_FILE_SIZE_MB}MB", file=sys.stderr)
+            sys.exit(1)
+        with open(path, encoding='utf-8') as f:
+            return json.load(f)
+    except FileNotFoundError:
+        print(f"Error: File not found: {path}", file=sys.stderr)
+        sys.exit(1)
+    except PermissionError:
+        print(f"Error: Permission denied: {path}", file=sys.stderr)
+        sys.exit(1)
+    except json.JSONDecodeError as e:
+        print(f"Error: Invalid JSON in {path}: {e}", file=sys.stderr)
+        sys.exit(1)
+
+
+class HealthStatus(Enum):
+    HEALTHY = "healthy"
+    WARNING = "warning"
+    DEGRADED = "degraded"
+    CRITICAL = "critical"
+
+
+@dataclass
+class ContextAnalysis:
+    total_tokens: int
+    token_limit: int
+    utilization: float
+    health_status: HealthStatus
+    health_score: float
+    degradation_risk: float
+    poisoning_risk: float
+    recommendations: list = field(default_factory=list)
+
+
+def estimate_tokens(text: str) -> int:
+    """Estimate token count (~4 chars per token for English)."""
+    return len(text) // 4
+
+
+def estimate_message_tokens(messages: list) -> int:
+    """Estimate tokens in message list."""
+    total = 0
+    for msg in messages:
+        if isinstance(msg, dict):
+            content = msg.get("content", "")
+            total += estimate_tokens(str(content))
+            # Add overhead for role, metadata
+            total += 10
+        else:
+            total += estimate_tokens(str(msg))
+    return total
+
+
+def measure_attention_distribution(context_length: int, sample_size: int = 100) -> list:
+    """
+    Simulate U-shaped attention distribution.
+    Real implementation would extract from model attention weights.
+    """
+    attention = []
+    for i in range(sample_size):
+        position = i / sample_size
+        # U-shaped curve: high at start/end, low in middle
+        if position < 0.1:
+            score = 0.9 - position * 2
+        elif position > 0.9:
+            score = 0.7 + (position - 0.9) * 2
+        else:
+            score = 0.3 + 0.1 * math.sin(position * math.pi)
+        attention.append(score)
+    return attention
+
+
+def detect_lost_in_middle(messages: list, critical_keywords: list) -> list:
+    """Identify critical items in attention-degraded regions."""
+    if not messages:
+        return []
+
+    total = len(messages)
+    warnings = []
+
+    for i, msg in enumerate(messages):
+        position = i / total
+        content = str(msg.get("content", "") if isinstance(msg, dict) else msg)
+
+        # Middle region (10%-90%)
+        if 0.1 < position < 0.9:
+            for keyword in critical_keywords:
+                if keyword.lower() in content.lower():
+                    warnings.append({
+                        "position": i,
+                        "position_pct": f"{position:.1%}",
+                        "keyword": keyword,
+                        "risk": "high" if 0.3 < position < 0.7 else "medium"
+                    })
+    return warnings
+
+
+def detect_poisoning_patterns(messages: list) -> dict:
+    """Detect potential context poisoning indicators."""
+    error_patterns = [
+        r"error", r"failed", r"exception", r"cannot", r"unable",
+        r"invalid", r"not found", r"undefined", r"null"
+    ]
+    # Simple contradiction check - look for both positive and negative statements
+    contradiction_keywords = [
+        ("is correct", "is not correct"),
+        ("should work", "should not work"),
+        ("will succeed", "will fail"),
+        ("is valid", "is invalid"),
+    ]
+
+    errors_found = []
+    contradictions = []
+
+    for i, msg in enumerate(messages):
+        content = str(msg.get("content", "") if isinstance(msg, dict) else msg).lower()
+
+        # Check error patterns
+        for pattern in error_patterns:
+            if re.search(pattern, content):
+                errors_found.append({"position": i, "pattern": pattern})
+
+        # Check for contradiction keywords (simplified)
+        for pos_phrase, neg_phrase in contradiction_keywords:
+            if pos_phrase in content and neg_phrase in content:
+                contradictions.append({"position": i, "type": "self-contradiction"})
+
+    total = max(len(messages), 1)
+    return {
+        "error_density": len(errors_found) / total,
+        "contradiction_count": len(contradictions),
+        "poisoning_risk": min(1.0, (len(errors_found) * 0.1 + len(contradictions) * 0.3))
+    }
+
+
+def calculate_health_score(utilization: float, degradation_risk: float, poisoning_risk: float) -> float:
+    """
+    Calculate composite health score.
+    1.0 = healthy, 0.0 = critical
+    """
+    score = 1.0
+    # Utilization penalty (kicks in after 70%)
+    if utilization > 0.7:
+        score -= (utilization - 0.7) * 1.5
+    # Degradation penalty
+    score -= degradation_risk * 0.3
+    # Poisoning penalty
+    score -= poisoning_risk * 0.2
+    return max(0.0, min(1.0, score))
+
+
+def get_health_status(score: float) -> HealthStatus:
+    """Map health score to status."""
+    if score > 0.8:
+        return HealthStatus.HEALTHY
+    elif score > 0.6:
+        return HealthStatus.WARNING
+    elif score > 0.4:
+        return HealthStatus.DEGRADED
+    return HealthStatus.CRITICAL
+
+
+def analyze_context(messages: list, token_limit: int = 128000,
+                    critical_keywords: Optional[list] = None) -> ContextAnalysis:
+    """
+    Comprehensive context health analysis.
+
+    Args:
+        messages: List of context messages
+        token_limit: Model's context window size
+        critical_keywords: Keywords that should be at attention-favored positions
+
+    Returns:
+        ContextAnalysis with health metrics and recommendations
+    """
+    critical_keywords = critical_keywords or ["goal", "task", "important", "critical", "must"]
+
+    # Calculate token utilization
+    total_tokens = estimate_message_tokens(messages)
+    utilization = total_tokens / token_limit
+
+    # Check for lost-in-middle issues
+    middle_warnings = detect_lost_in_middle(messages, critical_keywords)
+    degradation_risk = min(1.0, len(middle_warnings) * 0.2)
+
+    # Check for poisoning
+    poisoning = detect_poisoning_patterns(messages)
+    poisoning_risk = poisoning["poisoning_risk"]
+
+    # Calculate health
+    health_score = calculate_health_score(utilization, degradation_risk, poisoning_risk)
+    health_status = get_health_status(health_score)
+
+    # Generate recommendations
+    recommendations = []
+    if utilization > 0.8:
+        recommendations.append("URGENT: Context utilization >80%. Trigger compaction immediately.")
+    elif utilization > 0.7:
+        recommendations.append("WARNING: Context utilization >70%. Plan for compaction.")
+
+    if middle_warnings:
+        recommendations.append(f"Found {len(middle_warnings)} critical items in middle region. "
+                               "Consider moving to beginning/end.")
+
+    if poisoning_risk > 0.3:
+        recommendations.append("High poisoning risk detected. Review recent tool outputs for errors.")
+
+    if health_status == HealthStatus.CRITICAL:
+        recommendations.append("CRITICAL: Consider context reset with clean state.")
+
+    return ContextAnalysis(
+        total_tokens=total_tokens,
+        token_limit=token_limit,
+        utilization=utilization,
+        health_status=health_status,
+        health_score=health_score,
+        degradation_risk=degradation_risk,
+        poisoning_risk=poisoning_risk,
+        recommendations=recommendations
+    )
+
+
+def calculate_budget(system: int, tools: int, docs: int, history: int,
+                     buffer_pct: float = 0.15) -> dict:
+    """Calculate context budget allocation."""
+    subtotal = system + tools + docs + history
+    buffer = int(subtotal * buffer_pct)
+    total = subtotal + buffer
+
+    return {
+        "allocation": {
+            "system_prompt": system,
+            "tool_definitions": tools,
+            "retrieved_docs": docs,
+            "message_history": history,
+            "reserved_buffer": buffer
+        },
+        "total_budget": total,
+        "warning_threshold": int(total * 0.7),
+        "critical_threshold": int(total * 0.8),
+        "recommendations": [
+            f"Trigger compaction at {int(total * 0.7):,} tokens",
+            f"Aggressive optimization at {int(total * 0.8):,} tokens",
+            f"Reserved {buffer:,} tokens ({buffer_pct:.0%}) for responses"
+        ]
+    }
+
+
+def main():
+    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="Context health analyzer")
+    subparsers = parser.add_subparsers(dest="command", required=True)
+
+    # Analyze command
+    analyze_parser = subparsers.add_parser("analyze", help="Analyze context health")
+    analyze_parser.add_argument("context_file", help="JSON file with messages array")
+    analyze_parser.add_argument("--limit", type=int, default=128000, help="Token limit")
+    analyze_parser.add_argument("--keywords", nargs="+", help="Critical keywords to track")
+
+    # Budget command
+    budget_parser = subparsers.add_parser("budget", help="Calculate context budget")
+    budget_parser.add_argument("--system", type=int, default=2000, help="System prompt tokens")
+    budget_parser.add_argument("--tools", type=int, default=1500, help="Tool definitions tokens")
+    budget_parser.add_argument("--docs", type=int, default=3000, help="Retrieved docs tokens")
+    budget_parser.add_argument("--history", type=int, default=5000, help="Message history tokens")
+    budget_parser.add_argument("--buffer", type=float, default=0.15, help="Buffer percentage")
+
+    args = parser.parse_args()
+
+    if args.command == "analyze":
+        data = load_json_file(args.context_file)
+        messages = data if isinstance(data, list) else data.get("messages", [])
+        result = analyze_context(messages, args.limit, args.keywords)
+        print(json.dumps({
+            "total_tokens": result.total_tokens,
+            "token_limit": result.token_limit,
+            "utilization": f"{result.utilization:.1%}",
+            "health_status": result.health_status.value,
+            "health_score": f"{result.health_score:.2f}",
+            "degradation_risk": f"{result.degradation_risk:.2f}",
+            "poisoning_risk": f"{result.poisoning_risk:.2f}",
+            "recommendations": result.recommendations
+        }, indent=2))
+
+    elif args.command == "budget":
+        result = calculate_budget(args.system, args.tools, args.docs, args.history, args.buffer)
+        print(json.dumps(result, indent=2))
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    main()