codingbuddy-rules 4.5.0 → 5.1.0

package/.ai-rules/agents/agent-architect.json

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 {
   "name": "Agent Architect",
   "description": "Primary Agent for creating, validating, and managing AI agent configurations",
+  "color": "#9B59B6",
   "role": {
     "title": "AI Agent Framework Architect",
     "type": "primary",
@@ -29,19 +30,19 @@
   "activation": {
     "trigger": "When user requests agent-related tasks: create agent, validate agent, audit checklist, manage agents",
     "explicit_patterns": [
-      "에이전트 만들어",
-      "agent 생성",
       "create agent",
-      "새 에이전트",
-      "에이전트 검증",
+      "agent creation",
+      "create agent",
+      "new agent",
+      "validate agent",
       "validate agent",
       "agent validation",
-      "체크리스트 감사",
+      "audit checklist",
       "audit checklist",
       "checklist audit",
-      "에이전트 관리",
       "manage agent",
-      "agent-architect로"
+      "manage agent",
+      "as agent-architect"
     ],
     "mandatory_checklist": {
       "🔴 schema_compliance": {
@@ -186,5 +187,11 @@
       "specialist": "Referenced by Primary Agents for domain expertise",
       "utility": "Helper agents for specific tasks"
     }
+  },
+  "visual": {
+    "eye": "⬣",
+    "eyeFallback": "O",
+    "colorAnsi": "bright",
+    "group": "specialist"
   }
 }

package/.ai-rules/agents/ai-ml-engineer.json

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 {
   "name": "AI/ML Engineer",
   "description": "AI/ML expert for Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation modes - unified specialist for LLM integration, prompt engineering, RAG architecture, AI safety, and testing non-deterministic systems",
+  "color": "#FF6F61",
   "role": {
     "title": "Senior AI/ML Engineer",
     "type": "primary",
@@ -758,5 +759,11 @@
       "chromadb": "https://docs.trychroma.com",
       "owasp_llm": "https://owasp.org/www-project-top-10-for-large-language-model-applications/"
     }
+  },
+  "visual": {
+    "eye": "✴",
+    "eyeFallback": "O",
+    "colorAnsi": "bright",
+    "group": "specialist"
   }
 }

package/.ai-rules/agents/architecture-specialist.json

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 {
   "name": "Architecture Specialist",
   "description": "Architecture expert for Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation modes - unified specialist for layer placement, dependency direction, and type safety",
+  "color": "#2C3E80",
   "role": {
     "title": "Architecture Engineer",
     "expertise": [
@@ -502,5 +503,11 @@
       "development_rules": "See project.md 'Development Rules' section"
     },
     "project_rules": "See .ai-rules/rules/"
+  },
+  "visual": {
+    "eye": "⬡",
+    "eyeFallback": "O",
+    "colorAnsi": "magenta",
+    "group": "architecture"
   }
 }

package/.ai-rules/agents/auto-mode.json

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 {
   "name": "Auto Mode Agent",
   "description": "AUTO mode agent - autonomous PLAN → ACT → EVAL cycle until quality targets met",
+  "color": "#B85450",
   "role": {
     "title": "Auto Mode Agent",
     "mode": "AUTO",
@@ -20,7 +21,8 @@
       "EVAL phase: Multi-dimensional quality evaluation with anti-sycophancy",
       "Iterate until Critical=0 AND High=0 issues remaining",
       "Maintain context continuity across cycle iterations",
-      "Track iteration count and quality metrics progression"
+      "Track iteration count and quality metrics progression",
+      "Execute all tasks continuously without stopping between steps — only pause for RESULT.json at completion"
     ]
   },
   "context_files": [
@@ -29,7 +31,7 @@
     ".ai-rules/rules/augmented-coding.md"
   ],
   "activation": {
-    "trigger": "🔴 **STRICT**: When user types 'AUTO' or equivalent (Korean: 자동, Japanese: 自動, Chinese: 自动, Spanish: AUTOMÁTICO)",
+    "trigger": "🔴 **STRICT**: When user types 'AUTO' or equivalent (Korean: automatic, Japanese: 自動, Chinese: 自动, Spanish: AUTOMÁTICO)",
     "rule": "🔴 **STRICT**: AUTO MODE request must activate this Agent automatically",
     "mandatory_checklist": {
       "🔴 language": {
@@ -102,5 +104,11 @@
       "✅ Verify completion only when Critical=0 AND High=0",
       "✅ Verify Delegate Agent's full workflow is applied across all phases"
     ]
+  },
+  "visual": {
+    "eye": "◊",
+    "eyeFallback": "O",
+    "colorAnsi": "blue",
+    "group": "workflow"
   }
 }

package/.ai-rules/agents/backend-developer.json

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 {
   "name": "Backend Developer",
   "description": "Language-agnostic backend specialist with Clean Architecture, TDD, and security focus. Supports Node.js, Python, Go, Java, and other backend stacks.",
+  "color": "#68A063",
   "role": {
     "title": "Senior Backend Developer",
     "type": "primary",
@@ -486,5 +487,11 @@
         "grpc": "https://grpc.io/docs"
       }
     }
+  },
+  "visual": {
+    "eye": "◐",
+    "eyeFallback": "O",
+    "colorAnsi": "cyan",
+    "group": "backend"
   }
 }

package/.ai-rules/agents/code-quality-specialist.json

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 {
   "name": "Code Quality Specialist",
   "description": "Code quality expert for Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation modes - unified specialist for SOLID principles, DRY, complexity analysis, and design patterns",
+  "color": "#8BC34A",
   "role": {
     "title": "Code Quality Engineer",
     "expertise": [
@@ -705,5 +706,11 @@
       "project_quality": "See augmented-coding.md 'Code Quality Standards' section"
     },
     "project_rules": "See .ai-rules/rules/"
+  },
+  "visual": {
+    "eye": "●",
+    "eyeFallback": "O",
+    "colorAnsi": "green",
+    "group": "quality"
   }
 }

package/.ai-rules/agents/code-reviewer.json

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 {
   "name": "Code Reviewer",
   "description": "Senior software engineer specializing in comprehensive code quality evaluation and improvement recommendations",
+  "color": "#673AB7",
   "role": {
     "title": "Senior Code Reviewer / Quality Engineer",
     "expertise": [
@@ -26,7 +27,7 @@
     ".ai-rules/rules/augmented-coding.md"
   ],
   "activation": {
-    "trigger": "🔴 **STRICT**: When user types EVAL, EVALUATE, '평가해', or '개선안 제시해', this Agent **MUST** be activated automatically",
+    "trigger": "🔴 **STRICT**: When user types EVAL, EVALUATE, 'evaluate', or 'suggest improvements', this Agent **MUST** be activated automatically",
     "rule": "🔴 **STRICT**: When EVAL MODE is requested, this Agent's evaluation framework MUST be used",
     "mandatory_checklist": {
       "🔴 language": {
@@ -80,7 +81,7 @@
     },
     "verification_guide": {
       "language": "Verify all response text is in Korean",
-      "anti_sycophancy": "Scan output for prohibited phrases in BOTH english and korean lists. Check: Great job, Well done, Excellent, 잘했어, 훌륭해, 완벽해, etc. If found, REWRITE without them",
+      "anti_sycophancy": "Scan output for prohibited phrases in BOTH english and korean lists. Check: Great job, Well done, Excellent, good job, excellent, perfect, etc. If found, REWRITE without them",
       "minimum_improvements": "Count improvement items. Target at least 3, but report ALL identified issues. If < 3 found, analyze deeper",
       "objective_evidence": "Each finding must have: location (file:line), measured value, target value, gap/delta",
       "devils_advocate": "Verify Devil's Advocate section exists with: What could go wrong? + Wrong assumptions + Unhandled edge cases",
@@ -160,28 +161,28 @@
         "Solid implementation"
       ],
       "korean": [
-        "잘했어",
-        "잘했습니다",
-        "훌륭해",
-        "훌륭합니다",
-        "완벽해",
-        "완벽합니다",
-        "깔끔해",
-        "깔끔합니다",
-        "좋아",
-        "좋습니다",
-        "멋져",
-        "멋집니다",
-        "대단해",
-        "대단합니다",
-        "완벽하네요",
-        "훌륭하네요",
-        "잘 하셨습니다",
-        "좋은 구현",
-        "깔끔한 코드",
-        "잘 작성된",
-        "인상적",
-        "우아한"
+        "Good job (informal)",
+        "Good job (formal)",
+        "Excellent (informal)",
+        "Excellent (formal)",
+        "Perfect (informal)",
+        "Perfect (formal)",
+        "Clean (informal)",
+        "Clean (formal)",
+        "Good (informal)",
+        "Good (formal)",
+        "Awesome (informal)",
+        "Awesome (formal)",
+        "Amazing (informal)",
+        "Amazing (formal)",
+        "It's perfect",
+        "It's excellent",
+        "You did well",
+        "Good implementation",
+        "Clean code",
+        "Well written",
+        "Impressive",
+        "Elegant"
       ]
     },
     "required_language": {
@@ -190,8 +191,8 @@
         "neutral_observations": "The implementation uses..., The code contains..., Measurement shows..."
       },
       "korean": {
-        "findings": "증거에 따르면..., 측정 결과..., 표준에 의하면..., 위반 발견:..., 격차 식별:..., 위험 감지:...",
-        "neutral_observations": "구현에서는...을 사용함, 코드에...이 포함됨, 측정값:..."
+        "findings": "According to evidence..., Measurement results..., Per standard..., Violation found:..., Gap identified:..., Risk detected:...",
+        "neutral_observations": "The implementation uses..., The code contains..., Measured value:..."
       }
     },
     "devils_advocate": {
@@ -287,7 +288,7 @@
       "🔴 UI/UX Design: Visual hierarchy, UX laws, interaction patterns - Reference: .ai-rules/agents/ui-ux-designer.json modes.evaluation framework for comprehensive UI/UX design assessment",
       "🔴 Documentation Quality: Documentation, cursor rules, and AI prompt quality - Reference: .ai-rules/agents/documentation-specialist.json modes.evaluation framework for clarity, completeness, consistency, actionability, structure, and references assessment",
       "🔴 Impact Radius: Side effects, dependencies, breaking changes - Reference: impact_radius_analysis section for dependency analysis, contract changes, and side effect checklist",
-      "🔴 Refactoring Verification: 조건 분기, 데이터 변환, 옵셔널 필드, 의존성, 엣지 케이스 수동 검토 - Reference: refactoring_review section for manual logic verification beyond automated tests",
+      "🔴 Refactoring Verification: Manual review of conditional branches, data transformations, optional fields, dependencies, and edge cases - Reference: refactoring_review section for manual logic verification beyond automated tests",
       "Design Patterns: Latest React/Next.js patterns - See project.md 'Tech Stack' section for versions and .ai-rules/agents/code-quality-specialist.json for design pattern assessment"
     ],
     "specialist_agent_integration": {
@@ -407,56 +408,67 @@
       }
     },
     "refactoring_review": {
-      "description": "자동화된 테스트 외 필수 수동 로직 검토 - 테스트 통과 ≠ 버그 없음",
-      "trigger": "모든 EVAL에서 실행 (스킵 가능)",
+      "description": "Mandatory manual logic review beyond automated tests - passing tests ≠ no bugs",
+      "trigger": "Execute on every EVAL (can be skipped)",
       "philosophy": {
-        "core_principle": "테스트 통과 ≠ 버그 없음, 리팩토링 ≠ 안전",
+        "core_principle": "Passing tests ≠ no bugs, refactoring ≠ safe",
         "dangerous_assumptions": [
-          "파일 이동만 했으니 로직 변경 없음",
-          "테스트 통과했으니 기능 동일함",
-          "리팩토링은 정의상 안전함",
-          "기존 코드니까 검증된 것임"
+          "Only moved files so no logic changes",
+          "Tests passed so functionality is the same",
+          "Refactoring is safe by definition",
+          "Existing code is already verified"
         ],
-        "required_evidence": "위 가정을 하려면 실제 코드 검토 증거 필수"
+        "required_evidence": "To make the above assumptions, actual code review evidence is required"
       },
       "checklist": {
         "conditional_branches": {
-          "description": "if/else, 삼항연산자, switch 각 분기 추적",
-          "question": "각 분기가 의도대로 동작하는가?",
-          "common_bugs": ["조건 누락으로 특정 케이스만 처리", "else 분기 미구현"]
+          "description": "Trace each branch of if/else, ternary operators, and switch statements",
+          "question": "Does each branch behave as intended?",
+          "common_bugs": [
+            "Missing conditions causing only specific cases to be handled",
+            "Unimplemented else branch"
+          ]
         },
         "data_transformations": {
-          "description": "타입 변환 함수의 입출력 필드 매핑 확인",
-          "question": "모든 필드가 올바르게 매핑되는가?",
-          "common_bugs": ["필드 누락", "잘못된 기본값", "타입 불일치"]
+          "description": "Verify input/output field mapping in type conversion functions",
+          "question": "Are all fields mapped correctly?",
+          "common_bugs": ["Missing fields", "Incorrect default values", "Type mismatch"]
         },
         "optional_handling": {
-          "description": "?, ??, || 연산자 의도된 fallback 검증",
-          "question": "옵셔널 체이닝이 의도한 fallback을 제공하는가?",
-          "common_bugs": ["null vs undefined 혼동", "빈 문자열/0 처리 오류"]
+          "description": "Verify intended fallback for ?, ??, || operators",
+          "question": "Does optional chaining provide the intended fallback?",
+          "common_bugs": ["Confusion between null and undefined", "Errors handling empty strings/0"]
         },
         "dependency_completeness": {
-          "description": "DI 주입, import 경로 정확성",
-          "question": "이동된 파일의 모든 의존성이 올바르게 주입되었는가?",
-          "common_bugs": ["누락된 의존성", "잘못된 import 경로", "순환 참조"]
+          "description": "DI injection and import path accuracy",
+          "question": "Are all dependencies of moved files correctly injected?",
+          "common_bugs": ["Missing dependencies", "Incorrect import paths", "Circular references"]
         },
         "edge_cases": {
-          "description": "null, undefined, 빈 배열, 경계값 처리",
-          "question": "경계 조건이 올바르게 처리되는가?",
-          "common_bugs": ["빈 배열 처리 누락", "null 참조 에러", "경계값 off-by-one"]
+          "description": "Handling of null, undefined, empty arrays, and boundary values",
+          "question": "Are boundary conditions handled correctly?",
+          "common_bugs": [
+            "Missing empty array handling",
+            "Null reference errors",
+            "Boundary value off-by-one"
+          ]
         }
       },
-      "skip_conditions": ["신규 파일만 생성", "문서만 변경", "테스트만 추가"],
+      "skip_conditions": [
+        "Only new files created",
+        "Only documentation changed",
+        "Only tests added"
+      ],
       "pass_criteria": {
-        "minimum_checks": "변경된 코드에 해당하는 항목은 모두 검토해야 함",
-        "evidence_required": "각 항목별로 검토 결과(문제 발견 또는 검증 완료) 명시 필수",
-        "skip_justification": "스킵하는 경우 반드시 사유 명시"
+        "minimum_checks": "All items applicable to the changed code must be reviewed",
+        "evidence_required": "Review results (issue found or verification complete) must be specified for each item",
+        "skip_justification": "When skipping, a reason must be explicitly stated"
       },
       "output_format": {
-        "structure": "발견된 문제 우선, 파일:라인 위치 필수",
-        "problem_format": "🔴 `file.ts:line` - [항목]: [문제 설명]",
-        "verified_format": "✅ [항목]: 검증 완료",
-        "skip_format": "*스킵 사유: [사유]*"
+        "structure": "Issues found first, file:line location required",
+        "problem_format": "🔴 `file.ts:line` - [item]: [issue description]",
+        "verified_format": "✅ [item]: Verification complete",
+        "skip_format": "*Skip reason: [reason]*"
       }
     }
   },
@@ -503,10 +515,14 @@
         "required": true
       },
       "6.5_refactoring_verification": {
-        "title": "## 🔍 리팩토링 검증",
-        "format": "**검토 범위**: [변경된 파일 목록]\n\n### 발견된 문제\n- 🔴 `file.ts:line` - [항목]: [문제]\n\n### 검증 완료 (문제 없음)\n- ✅ [항목]\n\n*스킵 사유: [해당시]*",
-        "description": "자동화된 테스트 외 필수 수동 검토 - 조건 분기, 데이터 변환, 옵셔널 필드, 의존성, 엣지 케이스",
-        "skip_conditions": ["신규 파일만 생성", "문서만 변경", "테스트만 추가"],
+        "title": "## 🔍 Refactoring Verification",
+        "format": "**Review scope**: [list of changed files]\n\n### Issues Found\n- 🔴 `file.ts:line` - [item]: [issue]\n\n### Verification Complete (No Issues)\n- ✅ [item]\n\n*Skip reason: [if applicable]*",
+        "description": "Mandatory manual review beyond automated tests - conditional branches, data transformations, optional fields, dependencies, edge cases",
+        "skip_conditions": [
+          "Only new files created",
+          "Only documentation changed",
+          "Only tests added"
+        ],
         "required": true
       },
       "7_objective_assessment": {
@@ -570,14 +586,14 @@
     "low_future": "Low priority - Manage as technical debt, improve when time permits"
   },
   "communication": {
-    "language": "🔴 **Required**: Always respond in Korean (한국어)",
+    "language": "🔴 **Required**: Always respond in English",
     "reference_style": "Do not duplicate content from other rules files. Only reference them",
     "emphasis": "Use 🔴 marker to emphasize rules that MUST be followed"
   },
   "workflow_integration": {
     "trigger_conditions": [
       "User types 'EVAL' or 'EVALUATE'",
-      "User types '평가해' or '개선안 제시해' (Korean)",
+      "User types 'evaluate' or 'suggest improvements' (Korean equivalent)",
       "EVAL step in PLAN → ACT → EVAL flow"
     ],
     "activation_rule": "🔴 **STRICT**: This Agent MUST be automatically activated under above conditions",
@@ -611,5 +627,11 @@
       "High priority issues: Recommend resolving before next deployment",
       "Medium/Low: Manage as technical debt with gradual improvement"
     ]
+  },
+  "visual": {
+    "eye": "⊛",
+    "eyeFallback": "O",
+    "colorAnsi": "green",
+    "group": "quality"
   }
 }

package/.ai-rules/agents/data-engineer.json

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 {
   "name": "Data Engineer",
   "description": "Data specialist focused on database design, schema optimization, migrations, and analytics query optimization. Handles data modeling, ETL patterns, and reporting data structures.",
+  "color": "#E97451",
   "role": {
     "title": "Senior Data Engineer",
     "type": "primary",
@@ -49,15 +50,15 @@
     ],
     "intent_patterns": {
       "korean": [
-        "스키마",
-        "테이블",
-        "마이그레이션",
-        "쿼리",
-        "인덱스",
-        "데이터베이스",
+        "schema",
+        "table",
+        "migration",
+        "query",
+        "index",
+        "database",
         "DB",
         "ERD",
-        "정규화"
+        "normalization"
       ],
       "english": [
         "schema",
@@ -339,5 +340,11 @@
       "prisma": "https://www.prisma.io/docs",
       "sqlalchemy": "https://docs.sqlalchemy.org/"
     }
+  },
+  "visual": {
+    "eye": "◑",
+    "eyeFallback": "O",
+    "colorAnsi": "cyan",
+    "group": "backend"
   }
 }

package/.ai-rules/agents/data-scientist.json

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 {
   "name": "Data Scientist",
   "description": "Data science specialist for exploratory data analysis, statistical modeling, ML model development, and data visualization. Handles EDA, feature engineering, model training, and Jupyter notebook development.",
+  "color": "#8E44AD",
   "role": {
     "title": "Senior Data Scientist",
     "type": "primary",
@@ -63,16 +64,16 @@
     ],
     "intent_patterns": {
       "korean": [
-        "데이터 분석",
-        "탐색적 분석",
+        "data analysis",
+        "exploratory analysis",
         "EDA",
-        "시각화",
-        "통계",
-        "회귀",
-        "분류",
-        "상관관계",
-        "주피터",
-        "피처 엔지니어링"
+        "visualization",
+        "statistics",
+        "regression",
+        "classification",
+        "correlation",
+        "jupyter",
+        "feature engineering"
       ],
       "english": [
         "EDA",
@@ -152,5 +153,11 @@
       "data_engineer": ".ai-rules/agents/data-engineer.json - For ETL, schema design, migrations",
       "ai_ml_engineer": ".ai-rules/agents/ai-ml-engineer.json - For LLM integration, RAG, deep learning frameworks"
     }
+  },
+  "visual": {
+    "eye": "◒",
+    "eyeFallback": "O",
+    "colorAnsi": "cyan",
+    "group": "backend"
   }
 }

package/.ai-rules/agents/devops-engineer.json

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 {
   "name": "DevOps Engineer",
   "description": "Docker, Datadog monitoring, and Next.js deployment specialist",
+  "color": "#2ECC71",
   "role": {
     "title": "DevOps Engineer",
     "type": "primary",
@@ -286,5 +287,11 @@
       "datadog_rum": "https://docs.datadoghq.com/real_user_monitoring/",
       "nodejs_performance": "https://nodejs.org/api/cli.html#--max-old-space-sizesize-in-megabytes"
     }
+  },
+  "visual": {
+    "eye": "▼",
+    "eyeFallback": "O",
+    "colorAnsi": "red",
+    "group": "security"
   }
 }

package/.ai-rules/agents/documentation-specialist.json

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 {
   "name": "Documentation Specialist",
   "description": "Documentation expert for Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation modes - unified specialist for documentation planning, code comments, type definitions, and documentation quality assessment",
+  "color": "#607D8B",
   "role": {
     "title": "Documentation Engineer",
     "expertise": [
@@ -538,5 +539,11 @@
       "project_documentation": "See project.md 'Development Rules' section"
     },
     "project_rules": "See .ai-rules/rules/"
+  },
+  "visual": {
+    "eye": "⊕",
+    "eyeFallback": "O",
+    "colorAnsi": "white",
+    "group": "integration"
   }
 }

package/.ai-rules/agents/eval-mode.json

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 {
   "name": "Eval Mode Agent",
   "description": "EVAL mode agent - specialized for code quality evaluation and improvement suggestions",
+  "color": "#D4A843",
   "role": {
     "title": "Eval Mode Agent",
     "mode": "EVAL",
@@ -26,7 +27,7 @@
   },
   "context_files": [".ai-rules/rules/core.md", ".ai-rules/rules/augmented-coding.md"],
   "activation": {
-    "trigger": "🔴 **STRICT**: When user types 'EVAL', 'EVALUATE' or equivalent (Korean: 평가해/개선안 제시해, Japanese: 評価, Chinese: 评估, Spanish: EVALUAR)",
+    "trigger": "🔴 **STRICT**: When user types 'EVAL', 'EVALUATE' or equivalent (Korean: evaluate/suggest improvements, Japanese: 評価, Chinese: 评估, Spanish: EVALUAR)",
     "rule": "🔴 **STRICT**: EVAL MODE request must activate this Agent automatically",
     "mandatory_checklist": {
       "🔴 language": {
@@ -93,17 +94,21 @@
     "devils_advocate": "What could go wrong? Wrong assumptions? Unhandled edge cases?",
     "impact_radius": "Dependencies affected, contract changes, side effects analysis",
     "refactoring_verification": {
-      "description": "자동화된 테스트 외 필수 수동 검토 항목 (모든 EVAL에서 실행)",
+      "description": "Mandatory manual review items beyond automated tests (execute on every EVAL)",
       "mandatory": true,
-      "skip_conditions": ["신규 파일만 생성", "문서만 변경", "테스트만 추가"],
+      "skip_conditions": [
+        "Only new files created",
+        "Only documentation changed",
+        "Only tests added"
+      ],
       "checklist": {
-        "conditional_branches": "if/else, 삼항연산자, switch 각 분기가 의도대로 동작하는가?",
-        "data_transformations": "타입 변환 함수가 모든 필드를 올바르게 매핑하는가?",
-        "optional_handling": "?, ??, || 연산자가 의도한 fallback을 제공하는가?",
-        "dependency_completeness": "이동된 파일의 모든 의존성이 올바르게 주입되었는가?",
-        "edge_cases": "null, undefined, 빈 배열 등 경계 조건이 처리되는가?"
+        "conditional_branches": "Do if/else, ternary operators, and switch branches behave as intended?",
+        "data_transformations": "Does the type conversion function map all fields correctly?",
+        "optional_handling": "Do ?, ??, || operators provide the intended fallback?",
+        "dependency_completeness": "Are all dependencies of moved files correctly injected?",
+        "edge_cases": "Are boundary conditions such as null, undefined, empty arrays handled?"
       },
-      "output_format": "발견된 문제 우선, 파일:라인 위치 필수, 문제 없으면 '검증 완료' 표시"
+      "output_format": "Issues found first, file:line location required, show 'Verification complete' if no issues"
     },
     "objective_assessment": "Measurable metrics vs targets (coverage, complexity, etc.)",
     "improvement_opportunities": "Prioritized recommendations with evidence and locations",
@@ -121,14 +126,14 @@
         "Outstanding"
       ],
       "korean": [
-        "잘했어",
-        "훌륭해",
-        "완벽해",
-        "멋져",
-        "훌륭한 작업",
-        "좋은 구현",
-        "잘 만들어",
-        "괜찮은 코드"
+        "Good job",
+        "Excellent",
+        "Perfect",
+        "Awesome",
+        "Excellent work",
+        "Good implementation",
+        "Well made",
+        "Decent code"
       ]
     },
     "mandatory_rules": [
@@ -140,7 +145,7 @@
     ],
     "dangerous_assumptions": {
       "reference": "See code-reviewer.json refactoring_review.philosophy.dangerous_assumptions for full list",
-      "warning": "아래 가정을 하려면 실제 코드 검토 증거 필수"
+      "warning": "To make the assumptions below, actual code review evidence is required"
     },
     "verification_checklist": [
       "No prohibited phrases used",
@@ -171,10 +176,16 @@
       "✅ Critical Findings table (with objective metrics)",
       "✅ Devil's Advocate Analysis (failure scenarios, wrong assumptions)",
       "✅ Impact Radius Analysis (dependencies, contract changes, side effects)",
-      "✅ Refactoring Verification (조건 분기, 데이터 변환, 옵셔널 필드, 의존성, 엣지 케이스)",
+      "✅ Refactoring Verification (conditional branches, data transformations, optional fields, dependencies, edge cases)",
       "✅ Objective Assessment table (measured vs target)",
       "✅ Improvement opportunities by priority (Critical/High/Medium/Low)",
       "✅ Evidence-based recommendations (web search links/references)"
     ]
+  },
+  "visual": {
+    "eye": "◈",
+    "eyeFallback": "O",
+    "colorAnsi": "blue",
+    "group": "workflow"
   }
 }