codingbuddy-rules 2.2.1 → 2.3.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/.ai-rules/keyword-modes.json +16 -3
- package/.ai-rules/rules/core.md +24 -0
- package/package.json +1 -1
|
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
|
|
|
2
2
|
"modes": {
|
|
3
3
|
"PLAN": {
|
|
4
4
|
"description": "Task planning and design phase",
|
|
5
|
-
"instructions": "설계 우선 접근. TDD 관점에서 테스트 케이스 먼저 정의. 구현 전 아키텍처 검토.",
|
|
5
|
+
"instructions": "설계 우선 접근. TDD 관점에서 테스트 케이스 먼저 정의. 구현 전 아키텍처 검토. 📝 완료 후 docs/codingbuddy/plan/ 에 PLAN 문서 작성 권장 (./docs/codingbuddy/scripts/new-doc.sh plan <slug>).",
|
|
6
6
|
"rules": ["rules/core.md", "rules/augmented-coding.md"],
|
|
7
7
|
"agent": "plan-mode",
|
|
8
8
|
"delegates_to": "frontend-developer",
|
|
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
|
|
|
13
13
|
},
|
|
14
14
|
"ACT": {
|
|
15
15
|
"description": "Actual task execution phase",
|
|
16
|
-
"instructions": "Red-Green-Refactor 사이클 준수. 최소 구현 후 점진적 개선. 품질 기준 충족 확인.",
|
|
16
|
+
"instructions": "Red-Green-Refactor 사이클 준수. 최소 구현 후 점진적 개선. 품질 기준 충족 확인. 📝 완료 후 docs/codingbuddy/act/ 에 ACT 문서 작성 권장 (./docs/codingbuddy/scripts/new-doc.sh act <slug>).",
|
|
17
17
|
"rules": [
|
|
18
18
|
"rules/core.md",
|
|
19
19
|
"rules/project.md",
|
|
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
|
|
|
28
28
|
},
|
|
29
29
|
"EVAL": {
|
|
30
30
|
"description": "Result review and assessment phase",
|
|
31
|
-
"instructions": "코드 품질 검토. SOLID 원칙 준수 확인. 테스트 커버리지 점검. 개선점 제안.",
|
|
31
|
+
"instructions": "코드 품질 검토. SOLID 원칙 준수 확인. 테스트 커버리지 점검. 개선점 제안. 📝 완료 후 docs/codingbuddy/eval/ 에 EVAL 문서 작성 권장 (./docs/codingbuddy/scripts/new-doc.sh eval <slug>).",
|
|
32
32
|
"rules": ["rules/core.md", "rules/augmented-coding.md"],
|
|
33
33
|
"agent": "eval-mode",
|
|
34
34
|
"delegates_to": "code-reviewer",
|
|
@@ -38,6 +38,19 @@
|
|
|
38
38
|
"performance-specialist",
|
|
39
39
|
"code-quality-specialist"
|
|
40
40
|
]
|
|
41
|
+
},
|
|
42
|
+
"AUTO": {
|
|
43
|
+
"description": "Autonomous execution mode",
|
|
44
|
+
"instructions": "PLAN → ACT → EVAL 사이클 자동 실행. Critical/High 이슈가 0이 될 때까지 반복. (세션 문서는 각 PLAN/ACT/EVAL 단계에서 작성됨)",
|
|
45
|
+
"rules": ["rules/core.md", "rules/project.md", "rules/augmented-coding.md"],
|
|
46
|
+
"agent": "auto-mode",
|
|
47
|
+
"delegates_to": "frontend-developer",
|
|
48
|
+
"defaultSpecialists": [
|
|
49
|
+
"architecture-specialist",
|
|
50
|
+
"test-strategy-specialist",
|
|
51
|
+
"code-quality-specialist",
|
|
52
|
+
"security-specialist"
|
|
53
|
+
]
|
|
41
54
|
}
|
|
42
55
|
},
|
|
43
56
|
"defaultMode": "PLAN"
|
package/.ai-rules/rules/core.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -238,6 +238,14 @@ See `.ai-rules/rules/clarification-guide.md` for detailed question guidelines.
|
|
|
238
238
|
- [Framework best practices]
|
|
239
239
|
- [Accessibility considerations]
|
|
240
240
|
|
|
241
|
+
## 📝 Session Documentation (Optional)
|
|
242
|
+
To preserve this planning session for future reference:
|
|
243
|
+
\`\`\`bash
|
|
244
|
+
./docs/codingbuddy/scripts/new-doc.sh plan <slug>
|
|
245
|
+
\`\`\`
|
|
246
|
+
- Creates timestamped PLAN document in `docs/codingbuddy/plan/`
|
|
247
|
+
- Useful for: Complex features, team handoffs, audit trails
|
|
248
|
+
|
|
241
249
|
**Next:** Type `ACT` to execute, or modify plan
|
|
242
250
|
```
|
|
243
251
|
|
|
@@ -391,6 +399,14 @@ Execute implementation following TDD cycle, augmented coding principles, and qua
|
|
|
391
399
|
## 📝 Next Steps
|
|
392
400
|
[Return to PLAN mode automatically]
|
|
393
401
|
|
|
402
|
+
## 📝 Session Documentation (Optional)
|
|
403
|
+
To preserve this implementation session for future reference:
|
|
404
|
+
\`\`\`bash
|
|
405
|
+
./docs/codingbuddy/scripts/new-doc.sh act <slug>
|
|
406
|
+
\`\`\`
|
|
407
|
+
- Creates timestamped ACT document in `docs/codingbuddy/act/`
|
|
408
|
+
- Useful for: Implementation decisions, debugging context, knowledge transfer
|
|
409
|
+
|
|
394
410
|
**Next:** Type `ACT` to continue, `PLAN` to review, or `EVAL` for quality assessment
|
|
395
411
|
```
|
|
396
412
|
|
|
@@ -660,6 +676,14 @@ Self-improvement through iterative refinement
|
|
|
660
676
|
- [ ] Critical Findings section appears before What Works
|
|
661
677
|
- [ ] No defense of implementation decisions
|
|
662
678
|
|
|
679
|
+
## 📝 Session Documentation (Optional)
|
|
680
|
+
To preserve this evaluation session for future reference:
|
|
681
|
+
\`\`\`bash
|
|
682
|
+
./docs/codingbuddy/scripts/new-doc.sh eval <slug>
|
|
683
|
+
\`\`\`
|
|
684
|
+
- Creates timestamped EVAL document in `docs/codingbuddy/eval/`
|
|
685
|
+
- Useful for: Quality reviews, improvement tracking, retrospectives
|
|
686
|
+
|
|
663
687
|
**🔴 Required:**
|
|
664
688
|
- All recommendations must include web search validation or reference documentation
|
|
665
689
|
- Security and Accessibility assessments must reference respective Specialist Agent frameworks
|