codingbuddy-rules 2.1.0 → 2.2.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (33) hide show
  1. package/.ai-rules/adapters/antigravity.md +83 -3
  2. package/.ai-rules/adapters/claude-code.md +103 -13
  3. package/.ai-rules/adapters/codex.md +57 -0
  4. package/.ai-rules/adapters/cursor.md +56 -0
  5. package/.ai-rules/adapters/kiro.md +70 -4
  6. package/.ai-rules/adapters/opencode-skills.md +16 -16
  7. package/.ai-rules/adapters/opencode.md +107 -16
  8. package/.ai-rules/adapters/q.md +61 -4
  9. package/.ai-rules/agents/accessibility-specialist.json +1 -1
  10. package/.ai-rules/agents/act-mode.json +34 -34
  11. package/.ai-rules/agents/agent-architect.json +2 -2
  12. package/.ai-rules/agents/architecture-specialist.json +1 -1
  13. package/.ai-rules/agents/backend-developer.json +1 -1
  14. package/.ai-rules/agents/code-quality-specialist.json +1 -1
  15. package/.ai-rules/agents/code-reviewer.json +70 -0
  16. package/.ai-rules/agents/data-engineer.json +1 -1
  17. package/.ai-rules/agents/devops-engineer.json +6 -6
  18. package/.ai-rules/agents/documentation-specialist.json +1 -1
  19. package/.ai-rules/agents/eval-mode.json +52 -33
  20. package/.ai-rules/agents/frontend-developer.json +1 -1
  21. package/.ai-rules/agents/i18n-specialist.json +1 -1
  22. package/.ai-rules/agents/mobile-developer.json +1 -1
  23. package/.ai-rules/agents/performance-specialist.json +1 -1
  24. package/.ai-rules/agents/plan-mode.json +25 -25
  25. package/.ai-rules/agents/security-specialist.json +1 -1
  26. package/.ai-rules/agents/seo-specialist.json +1 -1
  27. package/.ai-rules/agents/solution-architect.json +2 -2
  28. package/.ai-rules/agents/technical-planner.json +2 -2
  29. package/.ai-rules/agents/test-strategy-specialist.json +1 -1
  30. package/.ai-rules/agents/tooling-engineer.json +1 -1
  31. package/.ai-rules/agents/ui-ux-designer.json +1 -1
  32. package/.ai-rules/rules/core.md +200 -2
  33. package/package.json +1 -1
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ See full workflow details in `.ai-rules/rules/core.md`
50
50
 
51
51
  #### Tech Stack
52
52
 
53
- 프로젝트의 `package.json`을 참조하세요.
53
+ See project `package.json`.
54
54
 
55
55
  #### Project Structure
56
56
  ```
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ Antigravity uses artifact files for:
126
126
 
127
127
  ### Communication
128
128
 
129
- - **Always respond in Korean (한국어)** as specified in common rules
129
+ - **Follow project's configured language setting**
130
130
  - Use structured markdown formatting
131
131
  - Provide clear, actionable feedback
132
132
 
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ When working with Antigravity, it automatically has access to:
161
161
  ### Workflow Example
162
162
 
163
163
  ```
164
- User: 새로운 뉴스레터 기능 만들어줘
164
+ User: Build a new newsletter feature
165
165
 
166
166
  AI: # Mode: PLAN
167
167
  ## 📋 Plan Overview
@@ -187,6 +187,86 @@ AI: # Mode: EVAL
187
187
  - ✅ Access to all specialist agent knowledge
188
188
  - ✅ Easy to update: change `.ai-rules/` once, all tools benefit
189
189
 
190
+ ## AUTO Mode
191
+
192
+ AUTO mode enables autonomous PLAN -> ACT -> EVAL cycling until quality criteria are met.
193
+
194
+ ### Triggering AUTO Mode
195
+
196
+ Use the `AUTO` keyword (or localized versions) at the start of your message:
197
+
198
+ | Language | Keyword |
199
+ |----------|---------|
200
+ | English | `AUTO` |
201
+ | Korean | `자동` |
202
+ | Japanese | `自動` |
203
+ | Chinese | `自动` |
204
+ | Spanish | `AUTOMATICO` |
205
+
206
+ ### Example Usage
207
+
208
+ ```
209
+ User: AUTO Build a new payment system feature
210
+
211
+ AI: # Mode: AUTO (Iteration 1/3)
212
+ ## Phase: PLAN
213
+ [Following .ai-rules/rules/core.md workflow]
214
+
215
+ ## Phase: ACT
216
+ [Execute with .ai-rules guidelines]
217
+
218
+ ## Phase: EVAL
219
+ [Evaluate with quality criteria]
220
+
221
+ ### Quality Status
222
+ - Critical: 0
223
+ - High: 0
224
+
225
+ ✅ AUTO mode completed successfully!
226
+ ```
227
+
228
+ ### Workflow
229
+
230
+ 1. **PLAN Phase**: Creates implementation plan with quality criteria
231
+ 2. **ACT Phase**: Executes implementation following TDD workflow
232
+ 3. **EVAL Phase**: Evaluates quality against exit criteria
233
+ 4. **Loop/Exit**: Continues cycling until:
234
+ - Success: `Critical = 0 AND High = 0`
235
+ - Failure: Max iterations reached (default: 3)
236
+
237
+ ### Antigravity-Specific Integration
238
+
239
+ AUTO mode works with Antigravity's task boundary tracking:
240
+
241
+ ```python
242
+ task_boundary(
243
+ TaskName="AUTO: Feature Implementation",
244
+ Mode="AUTO_ITERATION",
245
+ TaskSummary="Iteration 1/3 - PLAN phase completed",
246
+ TaskStatus="Executing ACT phase",
247
+ PredictedTaskSize=30
248
+ )
249
+ ```
250
+
251
+ ### Configuration
252
+
253
+ Configure in `codingbuddy.config.js`:
254
+
255
+ ```javascript
256
+ module.exports = {
257
+ auto: {
258
+ maxIterations: 3
259
+ }
260
+ };
261
+ ```
262
+
263
+ ### When to Use
264
+
265
+ - Large feature implementations requiring multiple refinement cycles
266
+ - Complex refactoring with quality verification
267
+ - Bug fixes needing comprehensive testing
268
+ - Code quality improvements with measurable criteria
269
+
190
270
  ## Maintenance
191
271
 
192
272
  When updating rules:
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ See `.ai-rules/rules/core.md` for:
27
27
 
28
28
  ### Project Context
29
29
  See `.ai-rules/rules/project.md` for:
30
- - Tech stack (프로젝트의 package.json 참조)
30
+ - Tech stack (see project package.json)
31
31
  - Project structure (app → widgets → features → entities → shared)
32
32
  - Development rules and file naming conventions
33
33
  - Domain knowledge
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ See `.ai-rules/agents/README.md` for available specialist agents and their exper
44
44
 
45
45
  ## Claude Code Specific
46
46
 
47
- - Always respond in Korean (한국어)
47
+ - Follow project's configured language setting
48
48
  - Use structured markdown formatting
49
49
  - Provide clear, actionable feedback
50
50
  - Reference project context from `.ai-rules/rules/project.md`
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ See `.ai-rules/agents/README.md` for available specialist agents and their exper
85
85
  ### In Claude Chat
86
86
 
87
87
  ```
88
- User: 새로운 기능 만들어줘
88
+ User: Build a new feature
89
89
 
90
90
  Claude: # Mode: PLAN
91
91
  [Following .ai-rules/rules/core.md workflow]
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ Specialist agents can be invoked by any Primary Agent as needed:
198
198
 
199
199
  1. **PLAN mode**: Always uses `solution-architect` or `technical-planner` based on prompt analysis
200
200
  2. **ACT mode**: Resolution priority:
201
- 1. Explicit agent request in prompt (e.g., "backend-developer로 작업해")
201
+ 1. Explicit agent request in prompt (e.g., "work with backend-developer")
202
202
  2. `recommended_agent` parameter (from PLAN mode recommendation)
203
203
  3. Tooling pattern matching (config files, build tools → `tooling-engineer`)
204
204
  4. Project configuration (`primaryAgent` setting)
@@ -321,22 +321,22 @@ The `parse_mode` MCP tool returns this field to recommend parallel specialist ex
321
321
  ### Parallel Execution Workflow
322
322
 
323
323
  ```
324
- parse_mode 호출
324
+ Call parse_mode
325
325
 
326
- parallelAgentsRecommendation 확인
327
- ↓ (있으면)
328
- 사용자에게 시작 메시지 표시
326
+ Check parallelAgentsRecommendation
327
+ ↓ (if exists)
328
+ Display start message to user
329
329
 
330
- prepare_parallel_agents MCP 호출
330
+ Call prepare_parallel_agents MCP
331
331
 
332
- 반환된 agent.taskPrompt Task tool 병렬 호출:
332
+ Call each agent.taskPrompt via Task tool in parallel:
333
333
  - subagent_type: "general-purpose"
334
334
  - run_in_background: true
335
335
  - prompt: agent.taskPrompt
336
336
 
337
- TaskOutput으로 결과 수집
337
+ Collect results with TaskOutput
338
338
 
339
- 사용자에게 결과 종합하여 표시
339
+ Display consolidated results to user
340
340
  ```
341
341
 
342
342
  ### Code Example
@@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ if (parseModeResult.parallelAgentsRecommendation) {
368
368
  prompt: agent.taskPrompt,
369
369
  description: agent.description,
370
370
  run_in_background: true,
371
- model: "haiku" // Use haiku for efficiency
371
+ model: "opus" // Use opus for thorough analysis
372
372
  })
373
373
  );
374
374
 
@@ -450,3 +450,93 @@ Each workflow mode activates different specialist agents:
450
450
  - **EVAL mode**: Security, accessibility, performance, and code quality specialists provide comprehensive review
451
451
 
452
452
  **Important:** Specialists from one mode do NOT carry over to the next mode. Each mode has its own recommended specialist set.
453
+
454
+ ## AUTO Mode
455
+
456
+ AUTO mode enables autonomous iteration through PLAN -> ACT -> EVAL cycles until quality criteria are met.
457
+
458
+ ### Triggering AUTO Mode
459
+
460
+ Use the `AUTO` keyword (or localized versions) at the start of your message:
461
+
462
+ | Language | Keyword |
463
+ |----------|---------|
464
+ | English | `AUTO` |
465
+ | Korean | `자동` |
466
+ | Japanese | `自動` |
467
+ | Chinese | `自动` |
468
+ | Spanish | `AUTOMATICO` |
469
+
470
+ ### Example Usage
471
+
472
+ ```
473
+ AUTO implement user authentication with JWT tokens
474
+ ```
475
+
476
+ ```
477
+ 자동 사용자 인증 기능을 JWT로 구현해줘
478
+ ```
479
+
480
+ ### Expected Behavior
481
+
482
+ 1. **Initial PLAN**: Creates implementation plan with quality criteria
483
+ 2. **ACT Iteration**: Executes implementation following TDD workflow
484
+ 3. **EVAL Check**: Evaluates quality against exit criteria
485
+ 4. **Loop or Exit**:
486
+ - If quality met (Critical=0, High=0): Exits with success summary
487
+ - If max iterations reached: Exits with failure summary and remaining issues
488
+ - Otherwise: Returns to PLAN with improvement focus
489
+
490
+ ### Exit Criteria
491
+
492
+ - **Success**: `Critical = 0 AND High = 0` severity issues
493
+ - **Failure**: Max iterations reached (default: 3, configurable via `auto.maxIterations`)
494
+
495
+ ### Configuration
496
+
497
+ Configure AUTO mode in `codingbuddy.config.js`:
498
+
499
+ ```javascript
500
+ module.exports = {
501
+ auto: {
502
+ maxIterations: 3 // Default: 3
503
+ }
504
+ };
505
+ ```
506
+
507
+ ### AUTO Mode Output Format
508
+
509
+ ```
510
+ # Mode: AUTO (Iteration 1/3)
511
+
512
+ ## Phase: PLAN
513
+ [Planning content...]
514
+
515
+ ## Phase: ACT
516
+ [Implementation content...]
517
+
518
+ ## Phase: EVAL
519
+ [Evaluation content...]
520
+
521
+ ### Quality Status
522
+ - Critical: 0
523
+ - High: 0
524
+
525
+ ✅ AUTO mode completed successfully!
526
+ ```
527
+
528
+ ### When to Use AUTO Mode
529
+
530
+ - **Large feature implementations** that require multiple refinement cycles
531
+ - **Complex refactoring** where quality verification is critical
532
+ - **Bug fixes** that need comprehensive testing and validation
533
+ - **Code quality improvements** with measurable success criteria
534
+
535
+ ### Differences from Manual Mode Flow
536
+
537
+ | Aspect | Manual Mode | AUTO Mode |
538
+ |--------|-------------|-----------|
539
+ | Transition | User triggers each mode | Automatic cycling |
540
+ | Iterations | Single pass per mode | Multiple cycles until quality met |
541
+ | Exit | User decides completion | Quality criteria or max iterations |
542
+ | Intervention | Required for each step | Only when requested or on failure |
@@ -147,3 +147,60 @@ Skills are located in `.ai-rules/skills/`. To use a skill:
147
147
  - `subagent-driven-development` - In-session plan execution
148
148
  - `dispatching-parallel-agents` - Handle parallel tasks
149
149
  - `frontend-design` - Build production-grade UI
150
+
151
+ ## AUTO Mode
152
+
153
+ AUTO mode enables autonomous PLAN -> ACT -> EVAL cycling until quality criteria are met.
154
+
155
+ ### Triggering AUTO Mode
156
+
157
+ Use the `AUTO` keyword (or localized versions) at the start of your message:
158
+
159
+ | Language | Keyword |
160
+ |----------|---------|
161
+ | English | `AUTO` |
162
+ | Korean | `자동` |
163
+ | Japanese | `自動` |
164
+ | Chinese | `自动` |
165
+ | Spanish | `AUTOMATICO` |
166
+
167
+ ### Example Usage
168
+
169
+ ```
170
+ AUTO implement user authentication with JWT
171
+ ```
172
+
173
+ ### Workflow
174
+
175
+ 1. **PLAN Phase**: Creates implementation plan with quality criteria
176
+ 2. **ACT Phase**: Executes implementation following TDD workflow
177
+ 3. **EVAL Phase**: Evaluates quality against exit criteria
178
+ 4. **Loop/Exit**: Continues cycling until:
179
+ - Success: `Critical = 0 AND High = 0`
180
+ - Failure: Max iterations reached (default: 3)
181
+
182
+ ### Copilot Integration
183
+
184
+ When using GitHub Copilot Chat with AUTO mode:
185
+ - Copilot references `.ai-rules/rules/core.md` for workflow
186
+ - Applies `.ai-rules/rules/augmented-coding.md` TDD principles
187
+ - Uses project structure from `.ai-rules/rules/project.md`
188
+
189
+ ### Configuration
190
+
191
+ Configure in `codingbuddy.config.js`:
192
+
193
+ ```javascript
194
+ module.exports = {
195
+ auto: {
196
+ maxIterations: 3
197
+ }
198
+ };
199
+ ```
200
+
201
+ ### When to Use
202
+
203
+ - Large feature implementations requiring multiple refinement cycles
204
+ - Complex refactoring with quality verification
205
+ - Bug fixes needing comprehensive testing
206
+ - Code quality improvements with measurable criteria
@@ -166,6 +166,62 @@ This project uses codingbuddy MCP server to manage AI Agents.
166
166
 
167
167
  See `AGENTS.md` in project root for details.
168
168
 
169
+ ## AUTO Mode
170
+
171
+ AUTO mode enables autonomous PLAN -> ACT -> EVAL cycling until quality criteria are met.
172
+
173
+ ### Triggering AUTO Mode
174
+
175
+ Use the `AUTO` keyword (or localized versions) at the start of your message:
176
+
177
+ | Language | Keyword |
178
+ |----------|---------|
179
+ | English | `AUTO` |
180
+ | Korean | `자동` |
181
+ | Japanese | `自動` |
182
+ | Chinese | `自动` |
183
+ | Spanish | `AUTOMATICO` |
184
+
185
+ ### Example Usage
186
+
187
+ ```
188
+ AUTO implement user authentication feature
189
+ ```
190
+
191
+ ```
192
+ 자동 사용자 인증 기능 구현해줘
193
+ ```
194
+
195
+ When AUTO keyword is detected, Cursor calls `parse_mode` MCP tool which returns AUTO mode instructions.
196
+
197
+ ### Workflow
198
+
199
+ 1. **PLAN Phase**: Creates implementation plan with quality criteria
200
+ 2. **ACT Phase**: Executes implementation following TDD workflow
201
+ 3. **EVAL Phase**: Evaluates quality against exit criteria
202
+ 4. **Loop/Exit**: Continues cycling until:
203
+ - Success: `Critical = 0 AND High = 0`
204
+ - Failure: Max iterations reached (default: 3)
205
+
206
+ ### Configuration
207
+
208
+ Configure in `codingbuddy.config.js`:
209
+
210
+ ```javascript
211
+ module.exports = {
212
+ auto: {
213
+ maxIterations: 3
214
+ }
215
+ };
216
+ ```
217
+
218
+ ### When to Use
219
+
220
+ - Large feature implementations requiring multiple refinement cycles
221
+ - Complex refactoring with quality verification
222
+ - Bug fixes needing comprehensive testing
223
+ - Code quality improvements with measurable criteria
224
+
169
225
  ## Reference
170
226
 
171
227
  - [AGENTS.md Official Spec](https://agents.md)
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ See `.ai-rules/rules/core.md` for:
29
29
  ### Project Context
30
30
 
31
31
  See `.ai-rules/rules/project.md` for:
32
- - **Tech Stack**: 프로젝트의 package.json 참조
32
+ - **Tech Stack**: See project package.json
33
33
  - **Architecture**: Layered structure (app → widgets → features → entities → shared)
34
34
  - **Conventions**: File naming, import/export rules, pure/impure function separation
35
35
 
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ See `.ai-rules/agents/` for domain expertise:
56
56
  [Add Kiro-specific customizations here]
57
57
 
58
58
  ### Communication
59
- - Always respond in Korean (한국어)
59
+ - Follow project's configured language setting
60
60
  - Use clear, structured markdown formatting
61
61
  - Provide actionable, specific feedback
62
62
  ```
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ See `.ai-rules/agents/` for domain expertise:
85
85
  ### In Kiro Session
86
86
 
87
87
  ```
88
- User: 새로운 컴포넌트 구현해줘
88
+ User: Build a new component
89
89
 
90
90
  Kiro: # Mode: PLAN
91
91
  [Follows .ai-rules/rules/core.md workflow]
@@ -122,9 +122,75 @@ Kiro will generate code following:
122
122
  2. Update `.kiro/rules/guidelines.md` only for Kiro-specific features
123
123
  3. Common rules propagate automatically to all Kiro sessions
124
124
 
125
+ ## AUTO Mode
126
+
127
+ AUTO mode enables autonomous PLAN -> ACT -> EVAL cycling until quality criteria are met.
128
+
129
+ ### Triggering AUTO Mode
130
+
131
+ Use the `AUTO` keyword (or localized versions) at the start of your message:
132
+
133
+ | Language | Keyword |
134
+ |----------|---------|
135
+ | English | `AUTO` |
136
+ | Korean | `자동` |
137
+ | Japanese | `自動` |
138
+ | Chinese | `自动` |
139
+ | Spanish | `AUTOMATICO` |
140
+
141
+ ### Example Usage
142
+
143
+ ```
144
+ User: AUTO 새로운 컴포넌트 구현해줘
145
+
146
+ Kiro: # Mode: AUTO (Iteration 1/3)
147
+ ## Phase: PLAN
148
+ [Follows .ai-rules/rules/core.md workflow]
149
+
150
+ ## Phase: ACT
151
+ [Executes with quality standards from .ai-rules]
152
+
153
+ ## Phase: EVAL
154
+ [Evaluates against quality criteria]
155
+
156
+ ### Quality Status
157
+ - Critical: 0
158
+ - High: 0
159
+
160
+ ✅ AUTO mode completed successfully!
161
+ ```
162
+
163
+ ### Workflow
164
+
165
+ 1. **PLAN Phase**: Creates implementation plan with quality criteria
166
+ 2. **ACT Phase**: Executes implementation following TDD workflow
167
+ 3. **EVAL Phase**: Evaluates quality against exit criteria
168
+ 4. **Loop/Exit**: Continues cycling until:
169
+ - Success: `Critical = 0 AND High = 0`
170
+ - Failure: Max iterations reached (default: 3)
171
+
172
+ ### Configuration
173
+
174
+ Configure in `codingbuddy.config.js`:
175
+
176
+ ```javascript
177
+ module.exports = {
178
+ auto: {
179
+ maxIterations: 3
180
+ }
181
+ };
182
+ ```
183
+
184
+ ### When to Use
185
+
186
+ - Large feature implementations requiring multiple refinement cycles
187
+ - Complex refactoring with quality verification
188
+ - Bug fixes needing comprehensive testing
189
+ - Code quality improvements with measurable criteria
190
+
125
191
  ## Getting Started
126
192
 
127
193
  1. Ensure `.ai-rules/` directory exists with all common rules
128
194
  2. Create `.kiro/rules/guidelines.md` with content above
129
195
  3. Start a Kiro session - it will automatically reference common rules
130
- 4. Use PLAN/ACT/EVAL workflow as defined in `.ai-rules/rules/core.md`
196
+ 4. Use PLAN/ACT/EVAL/AUTO workflow as defined in `.ai-rules/rules/core.md`
@@ -50,24 +50,24 @@ OpenCode/Crush supports Agent Skills standard for structured AI capabilities. Th
50
50
  ### 1. Direct Skill Invocation
51
51
  ```bash
52
52
  # In OpenCode CLI
53
- /skill brainstorming "새로운 기능 아이디어"
54
- /skill tdd "사용자 인증 구현"
55
- /skill debug "로그인 버그 해결"
53
+ /skill brainstorming "new feature ideas"
54
+ /skill tdd "user authentication implementation"
55
+ /skill debug "fix login bug"
56
56
  ```
57
57
 
58
58
  ### 2. Agent + Skill Combination
59
59
  ```bash
60
60
  # Planning with brainstorming skill
61
61
  /agent plan
62
- /skill brainstorming "대시보드 UI 개선"
62
+ /skill brainstorming "improve dashboard UI"
63
63
 
64
- # Implementation with TDD skill
64
+ # Implementation with TDD skill
65
65
  /agent build
66
- /skill tdd "API 연동 구현"
66
+ /skill tdd "implement API integration"
67
67
 
68
68
  # Review with debugging skill
69
69
  /agent reviewer
70
- /skill debug "성능 이슈 분석"
70
+ /skill debug "analyze performance issues"
71
71
  ```
72
72
 
73
73
  ### 3. Automatic Skill Recommendation
@@ -76,9 +76,9 @@ OpenCode can automatically recommend skills based on prompts using the `recommen
76
76
 
77
77
  ```typescript
78
78
  // Auto-triggered when user enters certain keywords
79
- "버그가 있어" → recommends: systematic-debugging
80
- "계획을 세워줘" → recommends: writing-plans
81
- "UI를 만들어줘" → recommends: frontend-design
79
+ "there's a bug" → recommends: systematic-debugging
80
+ "create a plan" → recommends: writing-plans
81
+ "build the UI" → recommends: frontend-design
82
82
  ```
83
83
 
84
84
  ## Skill Conversion Process
@@ -201,20 +201,20 @@ The MCP server handles Korean→English skill name mapping automatically.
201
201
  /agent plan
202
202
 
203
203
  # Use brainstorming skill
204
- /skill brainstorming "사용자 대시보드 개선"
204
+ /skill brainstorming "improve user dashboard"
205
205
 
206
206
  # Generate implementation plan
207
- 계획을 세워줘
207
+ Create a plan for me
208
208
  ```
209
209
 
210
210
  ### Implementing with TDD
211
211
 
212
- ```bash
212
+ ```bash
213
213
  # Switch to build agent
214
214
  /agent build
215
215
 
216
216
  # Load TDD skill
217
- /skill test-driven-development "로그인 API 구현"
217
+ /skill test-driven-development "implement login API"
218
218
 
219
219
  # Start TDD cycle
220
220
  ACT
@@ -224,10 +224,10 @@ ACT
224
224
 
225
225
  ```bash
226
226
  # Use systematic debugging
227
- /skill systematic-debugging "로그인 화면이 나와"
227
+ /skill systematic-debugging "screen not showing after login"
228
228
 
229
229
  # Apply debugging methodology
230
- 디버깅해줘
230
+ Debug this for me
231
231
  ```
232
232
 
233
233
  ## Benefits