codingbuddy-rules 2.0.0 → 2.2.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (42) hide show
  1. package/.ai-rules/adapters/antigravity.md +83 -3
  2. package/.ai-rules/adapters/claude-code.md +288 -5
  3. package/.ai-rules/adapters/codex.md +57 -0
  4. package/.ai-rules/adapters/cursor.md +172 -94
  5. package/.ai-rules/adapters/kiro.md +70 -4
  6. package/.ai-rules/adapters/opencode-skills.md +16 -16
  7. package/.ai-rules/adapters/opencode.md +107 -16
  8. package/.ai-rules/adapters/q.md +61 -4
  9. package/.ai-rules/agents/README.md +56 -0
  10. package/.ai-rules/agents/accessibility-specialist.json +1 -1
  11. package/.ai-rules/agents/act-mode.json +34 -34
  12. package/.ai-rules/agents/agent-architect.json +2 -2
  13. package/.ai-rules/agents/architecture-specialist.json +1 -1
  14. package/.ai-rules/agents/backend-developer.json +1 -1
  15. package/.ai-rules/agents/code-quality-specialist.json +1 -1
  16. package/.ai-rules/agents/code-reviewer.json +70 -0
  17. package/.ai-rules/agents/data-engineer.json +376 -0
  18. package/.ai-rules/agents/devops-engineer.json +6 -6
  19. package/.ai-rules/agents/documentation-specialist.json +1 -1
  20. package/.ai-rules/agents/eval-mode.json +52 -33
  21. package/.ai-rules/agents/frontend-developer.json +1 -1
  22. package/.ai-rules/agents/i18n-specialist.json +393 -0
  23. package/.ai-rules/agents/mobile-developer.json +355 -0
  24. package/.ai-rules/agents/performance-specialist.json +1 -1
  25. package/.ai-rules/agents/plan-mode.json +25 -25
  26. package/.ai-rules/agents/security-specialist.json +1 -1
  27. package/.ai-rules/agents/seo-specialist.json +1 -1
  28. package/.ai-rules/agents/solution-architect.json +2 -2
  29. package/.ai-rules/agents/technical-planner.json +2 -2
  30. package/.ai-rules/agents/test-strategy-specialist.json +1 -1
  31. package/.ai-rules/agents/tooling-engineer.json +202 -0
  32. package/.ai-rules/agents/ui-ux-designer.json +1 -1
  33. package/.ai-rules/checklists/accessibility.json +132 -0
  34. package/.ai-rules/checklists/code-quality.json +97 -0
  35. package/.ai-rules/checklists/index.json +47 -0
  36. package/.ai-rules/checklists/performance.json +97 -0
  37. package/.ai-rules/checklists/security.json +119 -0
  38. package/.ai-rules/checklists/seo.json +97 -0
  39. package/.ai-rules/checklists/testing.json +97 -0
  40. package/.ai-rules/rules/core.md +200 -2
  41. package/.ai-rules/skills/api-design/SKILL.md +459 -0
  42. package/package.json +1 -1
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ See full workflow details in `.ai-rules/rules/core.md`
50
50
 
51
51
  #### Tech Stack
52
52
 
53
- 프로젝트의 `package.json`을 참조하세요.
53
+ See project `package.json`.
54
54
 
55
55
  #### Project Structure
56
56
  ```
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ Antigravity uses artifact files for:
126
126
 
127
127
  ### Communication
128
128
 
129
- - **Always respond in Korean (한국어)** as specified in common rules
129
+ - **Follow project's configured language setting**
130
130
  - Use structured markdown formatting
131
131
  - Provide clear, actionable feedback
132
132
 
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ When working with Antigravity, it automatically has access to:
161
161
  ### Workflow Example
162
162
 
163
163
  ```
164
- User: 새로운 뉴스레터 기능 만들어줘
164
+ User: Build a new newsletter feature
165
165
 
166
166
  AI: # Mode: PLAN
167
167
  ## 📋 Plan Overview
@@ -187,6 +187,86 @@ AI: # Mode: EVAL
187
187
  - ✅ Access to all specialist agent knowledge
188
188
  - ✅ Easy to update: change `.ai-rules/` once, all tools benefit
189
189
 
190
+ ## AUTO Mode
191
+
192
+ AUTO mode enables autonomous PLAN -> ACT -> EVAL cycling until quality criteria are met.
193
+
194
+ ### Triggering AUTO Mode
195
+
196
+ Use the `AUTO` keyword (or localized versions) at the start of your message:
197
+
198
+ | Language | Keyword |
199
+ |----------|---------|
200
+ | English | `AUTO` |
201
+ | Korean | `자동` |
202
+ | Japanese | `自動` |
203
+ | Chinese | `自动` |
204
+ | Spanish | `AUTOMATICO` |
205
+
206
+ ### Example Usage
207
+
208
+ ```
209
+ User: AUTO Build a new payment system feature
210
+
211
+ AI: # Mode: AUTO (Iteration 1/3)
212
+ ## Phase: PLAN
213
+ [Following .ai-rules/rules/core.md workflow]
214
+
215
+ ## Phase: ACT
216
+ [Execute with .ai-rules guidelines]
217
+
218
+ ## Phase: EVAL
219
+ [Evaluate with quality criteria]
220
+
221
+ ### Quality Status
222
+ - Critical: 0
223
+ - High: 0
224
+
225
+ ✅ AUTO mode completed successfully!
226
+ ```
227
+
228
+ ### Workflow
229
+
230
+ 1. **PLAN Phase**: Creates implementation plan with quality criteria
231
+ 2. **ACT Phase**: Executes implementation following TDD workflow
232
+ 3. **EVAL Phase**: Evaluates quality against exit criteria
233
+ 4. **Loop/Exit**: Continues cycling until:
234
+ - Success: `Critical = 0 AND High = 0`
235
+ - Failure: Max iterations reached (default: 3)
236
+
237
+ ### Antigravity-Specific Integration
238
+
239
+ AUTO mode works with Antigravity's task boundary tracking:
240
+
241
+ ```python
242
+ task_boundary(
243
+ TaskName="AUTO: Feature Implementation",
244
+ Mode="AUTO_ITERATION",
245
+ TaskSummary="Iteration 1/3 - PLAN phase completed",
246
+ TaskStatus="Executing ACT phase",
247
+ PredictedTaskSize=30
248
+ )
249
+ ```
250
+
251
+ ### Configuration
252
+
253
+ Configure in `codingbuddy.config.js`:
254
+
255
+ ```javascript
256
+ module.exports = {
257
+ auto: {
258
+ maxIterations: 3
259
+ }
260
+ };
261
+ ```
262
+
263
+ ### When to Use
264
+
265
+ - Large feature implementations requiring multiple refinement cycles
266
+ - Complex refactoring with quality verification
267
+ - Bug fixes needing comprehensive testing
268
+ - Code quality improvements with measurable criteria
269
+
190
270
  ## Maintenance
191
271
 
192
272
  When updating rules:
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ See `.ai-rules/rules/core.md` for:
27
27
 
28
28
  ### Project Context
29
29
  See `.ai-rules/rules/project.md` for:
30
- - Tech stack (프로젝트의 package.json 참조)
30
+ - Tech stack (see project package.json)
31
31
  - Project structure (app → widgets → features → entities → shared)
32
32
  - Development rules and file naming conventions
33
33
  - Domain knowledge
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ See `.ai-rules/agents/README.md` for available specialist agents and their exper
44
44
 
45
45
  ## Claude Code Specific
46
46
 
47
- - Always respond in Korean (한국어)
47
+ - Follow project's configured language setting
48
48
  - Use structured markdown formatting
49
49
  - Provide clear, actionable feedback
50
50
  - Reference project context from `.ai-rules/rules/project.md`
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ See `.ai-rules/agents/README.md` for available specialist agents and their exper
85
85
  ### In Claude Chat
86
86
 
87
87
  ```
88
- User: 새로운 기능 만들어줘
88
+ User: Build a new feature
89
89
 
90
90
  Claude: # Mode: PLAN
91
91
  [Following .ai-rules/rules/core.md workflow]
@@ -175,9 +175,11 @@ CodingBuddy uses a layered agent hierarchy for different types of tasks:
175
175
  | Mode | Agents | Description |
176
176
  |------|--------|-------------|
177
177
  | **PLAN** | solution-architect, technical-planner | Design and planning tasks |
178
- | **ACT** | frontend-developer, backend-developer, devops-engineer, agent-architect | Implementation tasks |
178
+ | **ACT** | tooling-engineer, frontend-developer, backend-developer, devops-engineer, agent-architect | Implementation tasks |
179
179
  | **EVAL** | code-reviewer | Code review and evaluation |
180
180
 
181
+ > **Note**: `tooling-engineer` has highest priority for config/build tool tasks (tsconfig, eslint, vite.config, package.json, etc.)
182
+
181
183
  ### Tier 2: Specialist Agents
182
184
 
183
185
  Specialist agents can be invoked by any Primary Agent as needed:
@@ -195,9 +197,34 @@ Specialist agents can be invoked by any Primary Agent as needed:
195
197
  ### Agent Resolution
196
198
 
197
199
  1. **PLAN mode**: Always uses `solution-architect` or `technical-planner` based on prompt analysis
198
- 2. **ACT mode**: Uses recommended agent from PLAN, or falls back to AI analysis
200
+ 2. **ACT mode**: Resolution priority:
201
+ 1. Explicit agent request in prompt (e.g., "work with backend-developer")
202
+ 2. `recommended_agent` parameter (from PLAN mode recommendation)
203
+ 3. Tooling pattern matching (config files, build tools → `tooling-engineer`)
204
+ 4. Project configuration (`primaryAgent` setting)
205
+ 5. Context inference (file extension/path)
206
+ 6. Default: `frontend-developer`
199
207
  3. **EVAL mode**: Always uses `code-reviewer`
200
208
 
209
+ ### Using recommended_agent Parameter
210
+
211
+ When transitioning from PLAN to ACT mode, pass the recommended agent:
212
+
213
+ ```typescript
214
+ // After PLAN mode returns recommended_act_agent
215
+ const planResult = await parse_mode({ prompt: "PLAN design auth API" });
216
+ // planResult.recommended_act_agent = { agentName: "backend-developer", ... }
217
+
218
+ // Pass to ACT mode for context preservation
219
+ const actResult = await parse_mode({
220
+ prompt: "ACT implement the API",
221
+ recommended_agent: planResult.recommended_act_agent.agentName
222
+ });
223
+ // actResult.delegates_to = "backend-developer" (uses the recommendation)
224
+ ```
225
+
226
+ This enables seamless agent context passing across PLAN → ACT workflow transitions.
227
+
201
228
  ## Activation Messages
202
229
 
203
230
  When agents or skills are activated, CodingBuddy displays activation messages for transparency:
@@ -257,3 +284,259 @@ AI assistants should display the `activation_message.formatted` field at the sta
257
284
 
258
285
  ...
259
286
  ```
287
+
288
+ ## Parallel Specialist Agents Execution
289
+
290
+ CodingBuddy supports parallel execution of multiple specialist agents for comprehensive analysis.
291
+
292
+ ### When to Use Parallel Execution
293
+
294
+ Parallel execution is recommended when `parse_mode` returns a `parallelAgentsRecommendation` field:
295
+
296
+ | Mode | Default Specialists | Use Case |
297
+ |------|---------------------|----------|
298
+ | **PLAN** | architecture-specialist, test-strategy-specialist | Validate architecture and test approach |
299
+ | **ACT** | code-quality-specialist, test-strategy-specialist | Verify implementation quality |
300
+ | **EVAL** | security-specialist, accessibility-specialist, performance-specialist, code-quality-specialist | Comprehensive multi-dimensional review |
301
+
302
+ ### parallelAgentsRecommendation Response Field
303
+
304
+ The `parse_mode` MCP tool returns this field to recommend parallel specialist execution:
305
+
306
+ ```json
307
+ {
308
+ "mode": "EVAL",
309
+ "parallelAgentsRecommendation": {
310
+ "specialists": [
311
+ "security-specialist",
312
+ "accessibility-specialist",
313
+ "performance-specialist",
314
+ "code-quality-specialist"
315
+ ],
316
+ "hint": "Use Task tool with subagent_type=\"general-purpose\" and run_in_background=true for each specialist. Call prepare_parallel_agents MCP tool to get ready-to-use prompts."
317
+ }
318
+ }
319
+ ```
320
+
321
+ ### Parallel Execution Workflow
322
+
323
+ ```
324
+ Call parse_mode
325
+
326
+ Check parallelAgentsRecommendation
327
+ ↓ (if exists)
328
+ Display start message to user
329
+
330
+ Call prepare_parallel_agents MCP
331
+
332
+ Call each agent.taskPrompt via Task tool in parallel:
333
+ - subagent_type: "general-purpose"
334
+ - run_in_background: true
335
+ - prompt: agent.taskPrompt
336
+
337
+ Collect results with TaskOutput
338
+
339
+ Display consolidated results to user
340
+ ```
341
+
342
+ ### Code Example
343
+
344
+ ```typescript
345
+ // Step 1: Parse mode returns parallelAgentsRecommendation
346
+ const parseModeResult = await parse_mode({ prompt: "EVAL review auth implementation" });
347
+
348
+ if (parseModeResult.parallelAgentsRecommendation) {
349
+ // Step 2: Display start message to user
350
+ console.log("🚀 Dispatching 4 specialist agents in parallel...");
351
+ console.log(" → 🔒 security-specialist");
352
+ console.log(" → ♿ accessibility-specialist");
353
+ console.log(" → ⚡ performance-specialist");
354
+ console.log(" → 📏 code-quality-specialist");
355
+
356
+ // Step 3: Prepare parallel agents
357
+ const preparedAgents = await prepare_parallel_agents({
358
+ mode: "EVAL",
359
+ specialists: parseModeResult.parallelAgentsRecommendation.specialists,
360
+ sharedContext: "Review authentication implementation",
361
+ targetFiles: ["src/auth/login.tsx"]
362
+ });
363
+
364
+ // Step 4: Execute in parallel using Task tool
365
+ const agentTasks = preparedAgents.agents.map(agent =>
366
+ Task({
367
+ subagent_type: "general-purpose",
368
+ prompt: agent.taskPrompt,
369
+ description: agent.description,
370
+ run_in_background: true,
371
+ model: "opus" // Use opus for thorough analysis
372
+ })
373
+ );
374
+
375
+ // Step 5: Collect results
376
+ const results = await Promise.all(agentTasks.map(task => TaskOutput(task.id)));
377
+
378
+ // Step 6: Display summary
379
+ console.log("📊 Specialist Analysis Complete:");
380
+ results.forEach(result => console.log(result.summary));
381
+ }
382
+ ```
383
+
384
+ ### Visibility Pattern
385
+
386
+ When executing parallel specialists, display clear status messages:
387
+
388
+ **Start Message:**
389
+ ```
390
+ 🚀 Dispatching N specialist agents in parallel...
391
+ → 🔒 security-specialist
392
+ → ♿ accessibility-specialist
393
+ → ⚡ performance-specialist
394
+ → 📏 code-quality-specialist
395
+ ```
396
+
397
+ **Completion Message:**
398
+ ```
399
+ 📊 Specialist Analysis Complete:
400
+
401
+ 🔒 Security Specialist:
402
+ [findings summary]
403
+
404
+ ♿ Accessibility Specialist:
405
+ [findings summary]
406
+
407
+ ⚡ Performance Specialist:
408
+ [findings summary]
409
+
410
+ 📏 Code Quality Specialist:
411
+ [findings summary]
412
+ ```
413
+
414
+ ### Specialist Icons
415
+
416
+ | Icon | Specialist |
417
+ |------|------------|
418
+ | 🔒 | security-specialist |
419
+ | ♿ | accessibility-specialist |
420
+ | ⚡ | performance-specialist |
421
+ | 📏 | code-quality-specialist |
422
+ | 🧪 | test-strategy-specialist |
423
+ | 🏛️ | architecture-specialist |
424
+ | 📚 | documentation-specialist |
425
+ | 🔍 | seo-specialist |
426
+ | 🎨 | design-system-specialist |
427
+
428
+ ### Handling Failures
429
+
430
+ When `prepare_parallel_agents` returns `failedAgents`:
431
+
432
+ ```
433
+ ⚠️ Some agents failed to load:
434
+ ✗ performance-specialist: Profile not found
435
+
436
+ Continuing with 3/4 agents...
437
+ ```
438
+
439
+ **Strategy:**
440
+ - Continue with successfully loaded agents
441
+ - Report failures clearly to user
442
+ - Document which agents couldn't be loaded in final report
443
+
444
+ ### Specialist Activation Scope
445
+
446
+ Each workflow mode activates different specialist agents:
447
+
448
+ - **PLAN mode**: Architecture and test strategy specialists validate design
449
+ - **ACT mode**: Code quality and test strategy specialists verify implementation
450
+ - **EVAL mode**: Security, accessibility, performance, and code quality specialists provide comprehensive review
451
+
452
+ **Important:** Specialists from one mode do NOT carry over to the next mode. Each mode has its own recommended specialist set.
453
+
454
+ ## AUTO Mode
455
+
456
+ AUTO mode enables autonomous iteration through PLAN -> ACT -> EVAL cycles until quality criteria are met.
457
+
458
+ ### Triggering AUTO Mode
459
+
460
+ Use the `AUTO` keyword (or localized versions) at the start of your message:
461
+
462
+ | Language | Keyword |
463
+ |----------|---------|
464
+ | English | `AUTO` |
465
+ | Korean | `자동` |
466
+ | Japanese | `自動` |
467
+ | Chinese | `自动` |
468
+ | Spanish | `AUTOMATICO` |
469
+
470
+ ### Example Usage
471
+
472
+ ```
473
+ AUTO implement user authentication with JWT tokens
474
+ ```
475
+
476
+ ```
477
+ 자동 사용자 인증 기능을 JWT로 구현해줘
478
+ ```
479
+
480
+ ### Expected Behavior
481
+
482
+ 1. **Initial PLAN**: Creates implementation plan with quality criteria
483
+ 2. **ACT Iteration**: Executes implementation following TDD workflow
484
+ 3. **EVAL Check**: Evaluates quality against exit criteria
485
+ 4. **Loop or Exit**:
486
+ - If quality met (Critical=0, High=0): Exits with success summary
487
+ - If max iterations reached: Exits with failure summary and remaining issues
488
+ - Otherwise: Returns to PLAN with improvement focus
489
+
490
+ ### Exit Criteria
491
+
492
+ - **Success**: `Critical = 0 AND High = 0` severity issues
493
+ - **Failure**: Max iterations reached (default: 3, configurable via `auto.maxIterations`)
494
+
495
+ ### Configuration
496
+
497
+ Configure AUTO mode in `codingbuddy.config.js`:
498
+
499
+ ```javascript
500
+ module.exports = {
501
+ auto: {
502
+ maxIterations: 3 // Default: 3
503
+ }
504
+ };
505
+ ```
506
+
507
+ ### AUTO Mode Output Format
508
+
509
+ ```
510
+ # Mode: AUTO (Iteration 1/3)
511
+
512
+ ## Phase: PLAN
513
+ [Planning content...]
514
+
515
+ ## Phase: ACT
516
+ [Implementation content...]
517
+
518
+ ## Phase: EVAL
519
+ [Evaluation content...]
520
+
521
+ ### Quality Status
522
+ - Critical: 0
523
+ - High: 0
524
+
525
+ ✅ AUTO mode completed successfully!
526
+ ```
527
+
528
+ ### When to Use AUTO Mode
529
+
530
+ - **Large feature implementations** that require multiple refinement cycles
531
+ - **Complex refactoring** where quality verification is critical
532
+ - **Bug fixes** that need comprehensive testing and validation
533
+ - **Code quality improvements** with measurable success criteria
534
+
535
+ ### Differences from Manual Mode Flow
536
+
537
+ | Aspect | Manual Mode | AUTO Mode |
538
+ |--------|-------------|-----------|
539
+ | Transition | User triggers each mode | Automatic cycling |
540
+ | Iterations | Single pass per mode | Multiple cycles until quality met |
541
+ | Exit | User decides completion | Quality criteria or max iterations |
542
+ | Intervention | Required for each step | Only when requested or on failure |
@@ -147,3 +147,60 @@ Skills are located in `.ai-rules/skills/`. To use a skill:
147
147
  - `subagent-driven-development` - In-session plan execution
148
148
  - `dispatching-parallel-agents` - Handle parallel tasks
149
149
  - `frontend-design` - Build production-grade UI
150
+
151
+ ## AUTO Mode
152
+
153
+ AUTO mode enables autonomous PLAN -> ACT -> EVAL cycling until quality criteria are met.
154
+
155
+ ### Triggering AUTO Mode
156
+
157
+ Use the `AUTO` keyword (or localized versions) at the start of your message:
158
+
159
+ | Language | Keyword |
160
+ |----------|---------|
161
+ | English | `AUTO` |
162
+ | Korean | `자동` |
163
+ | Japanese | `自動` |
164
+ | Chinese | `自动` |
165
+ | Spanish | `AUTOMATICO` |
166
+
167
+ ### Example Usage
168
+
169
+ ```
170
+ AUTO implement user authentication with JWT
171
+ ```
172
+
173
+ ### Workflow
174
+
175
+ 1. **PLAN Phase**: Creates implementation plan with quality criteria
176
+ 2. **ACT Phase**: Executes implementation following TDD workflow
177
+ 3. **EVAL Phase**: Evaluates quality against exit criteria
178
+ 4. **Loop/Exit**: Continues cycling until:
179
+ - Success: `Critical = 0 AND High = 0`
180
+ - Failure: Max iterations reached (default: 3)
181
+
182
+ ### Copilot Integration
183
+
184
+ When using GitHub Copilot Chat with AUTO mode:
185
+ - Copilot references `.ai-rules/rules/core.md` for workflow
186
+ - Applies `.ai-rules/rules/augmented-coding.md` TDD principles
187
+ - Uses project structure from `.ai-rules/rules/project.md`
188
+
189
+ ### Configuration
190
+
191
+ Configure in `codingbuddy.config.js`:
192
+
193
+ ```javascript
194
+ module.exports = {
195
+ auto: {
196
+ maxIterations: 3
197
+ }
198
+ };
199
+ ```
200
+
201
+ ### When to Use
202
+
203
+ - Large feature implementations requiring multiple refinement cycles
204
+ - Complex refactoring with quality verification
205
+ - Bug fixes needing comprehensive testing
206
+ - Code quality improvements with measurable criteria