codingbuddy-rules 0.0.0-canary.20260107011541.g12891ae → 0.0.0-canary.20260107062625.g7d1cfe9

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (29) hide show
  1. package/.ai-rules/adapters/antigravity.md +4 -4
  2. package/.ai-rules/adapters/claude-code.md +12 -12
  3. package/.ai-rules/adapters/kiro.md +3 -3
  4. package/.ai-rules/adapters/opencode-skills.md +16 -16
  5. package/.ai-rules/adapters/opencode.md +17 -17
  6. package/.ai-rules/adapters/q.md +4 -4
  7. package/.ai-rules/agents/accessibility-specialist.json +1 -1
  8. package/.ai-rules/agents/act-mode.json +34 -34
  9. package/.ai-rules/agents/agent-architect.json +2 -2
  10. package/.ai-rules/agents/architecture-specialist.json +1 -1
  11. package/.ai-rules/agents/backend-developer.json +1 -1
  12. package/.ai-rules/agents/code-quality-specialist.json +1 -1
  13. package/.ai-rules/agents/data-engineer.json +1 -1
  14. package/.ai-rules/agents/devops-engineer.json +6 -6
  15. package/.ai-rules/agents/documentation-specialist.json +1 -1
  16. package/.ai-rules/agents/eval-mode.json +33 -33
  17. package/.ai-rules/agents/frontend-developer.json +1 -1
  18. package/.ai-rules/agents/i18n-specialist.json +1 -1
  19. package/.ai-rules/agents/mobile-developer.json +1 -1
  20. package/.ai-rules/agents/performance-specialist.json +1 -1
  21. package/.ai-rules/agents/plan-mode.json +25 -25
  22. package/.ai-rules/agents/security-specialist.json +1 -1
  23. package/.ai-rules/agents/seo-specialist.json +1 -1
  24. package/.ai-rules/agents/solution-architect.json +2 -2
  25. package/.ai-rules/agents/technical-planner.json +2 -2
  26. package/.ai-rules/agents/test-strategy-specialist.json +1 -1
  27. package/.ai-rules/agents/tooling-engineer.json +1 -1
  28. package/.ai-rules/agents/ui-ux-designer.json +1 -1
  29. package/package.json +1 -1
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ See full workflow details in `.ai-rules/rules/core.md`
50
50
 
51
51
  #### Tech Stack
52
52
 
53
- 프로젝트의 `package.json`을 참조하세요.
53
+ See project `package.json`.
54
54
 
55
55
  #### Project Structure
56
56
  ```
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ Antigravity uses artifact files for:
126
126
 
127
127
  ### Communication
128
128
 
129
- - **Always respond in Korean (한국어)** as specified in common rules
129
+ - **Follow project's configured language setting**
130
130
  - Use structured markdown formatting
131
131
  - Provide clear, actionable feedback
132
132
 
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ When working with Antigravity, it automatically has access to:
161
161
  ### Workflow Example
162
162
 
163
163
  ```
164
- User: 새로운 뉴스레터 기능 만들어줘
164
+ User: Build a new newsletter feature
165
165
 
166
166
  AI: # Mode: PLAN
167
167
  ## 📋 Plan Overview
@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ Use the `AUTO` keyword (or localized versions) at the start of your message:
206
206
  ### Example Usage
207
207
 
208
208
  ```
209
- User: AUTO 새로운 결제 시스템 기능 만들어줘
209
+ User: AUTO Build a new payment system feature
210
210
 
211
211
  AI: # Mode: AUTO (Iteration 1/3)
212
212
  ## Phase: PLAN
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ See `.ai-rules/rules/core.md` for:
27
27
 
28
28
  ### Project Context
29
29
  See `.ai-rules/rules/project.md` for:
30
- - Tech stack (프로젝트의 package.json 참조)
30
+ - Tech stack (see project package.json)
31
31
  - Project structure (app → widgets → features → entities → shared)
32
32
  - Development rules and file naming conventions
33
33
  - Domain knowledge
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ See `.ai-rules/agents/README.md` for available specialist agents and their exper
44
44
 
45
45
  ## Claude Code Specific
46
46
 
47
- - Always respond in Korean (한국어)
47
+ - Follow project's configured language setting
48
48
  - Use structured markdown formatting
49
49
  - Provide clear, actionable feedback
50
50
  - Reference project context from `.ai-rules/rules/project.md`
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ See `.ai-rules/agents/README.md` for available specialist agents and their exper
85
85
  ### In Claude Chat
86
86
 
87
87
  ```
88
- User: 새로운 기능 만들어줘
88
+ User: Build a new feature
89
89
 
90
90
  Claude: # Mode: PLAN
91
91
  [Following .ai-rules/rules/core.md workflow]
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ Specialist agents can be invoked by any Primary Agent as needed:
198
198
 
199
199
  1. **PLAN mode**: Always uses `solution-architect` or `technical-planner` based on prompt analysis
200
200
  2. **ACT mode**: Resolution priority:
201
- 1. Explicit agent request in prompt (e.g., "backend-developer로 작업해")
201
+ 1. Explicit agent request in prompt (e.g., "work with backend-developer")
202
202
  2. `recommended_agent` parameter (from PLAN mode recommendation)
203
203
  3. Tooling pattern matching (config files, build tools → `tooling-engineer`)
204
204
  4. Project configuration (`primaryAgent` setting)
@@ -321,22 +321,22 @@ The `parse_mode` MCP tool returns this field to recommend parallel specialist ex
321
321
  ### Parallel Execution Workflow
322
322
 
323
323
  ```
324
- parse_mode 호출
324
+ Call parse_mode
325
325
 
326
- parallelAgentsRecommendation 확인
327
- ↓ (있으면)
328
- 사용자에게 시작 메시지 표시
326
+ Check parallelAgentsRecommendation
327
+ ↓ (if exists)
328
+ Display start message to user
329
329
 
330
- prepare_parallel_agents MCP 호출
330
+ Call prepare_parallel_agents MCP
331
331
 
332
- 반환된 agent.taskPrompt Task tool 병렬 호출:
332
+ Call each agent.taskPrompt via Task tool in parallel:
333
333
  - subagent_type: "general-purpose"
334
334
  - run_in_background: true
335
335
  - prompt: agent.taskPrompt
336
336
 
337
- TaskOutput으로 결과 수집
337
+ Collect results with TaskOutput
338
338
 
339
- 사용자에게 결과 종합하여 표시
339
+ Display consolidated results to user
340
340
  ```
341
341
 
342
342
  ### Code Example
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ See `.ai-rules/rules/core.md` for:
29
29
  ### Project Context
30
30
 
31
31
  See `.ai-rules/rules/project.md` for:
32
- - **Tech Stack**: 프로젝트의 package.json 참조
32
+ - **Tech Stack**: See project package.json
33
33
  - **Architecture**: Layered structure (app → widgets → features → entities → shared)
34
34
  - **Conventions**: File naming, import/export rules, pure/impure function separation
35
35
 
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ See `.ai-rules/agents/` for domain expertise:
56
56
  [Add Kiro-specific customizations here]
57
57
 
58
58
  ### Communication
59
- - Always respond in Korean (한국어)
59
+ - Follow project's configured language setting
60
60
  - Use clear, structured markdown formatting
61
61
  - Provide actionable, specific feedback
62
62
  ```
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ See `.ai-rules/agents/` for domain expertise:
85
85
  ### In Kiro Session
86
86
 
87
87
  ```
88
- User: 새로운 컴포넌트 구현해줘
88
+ User: Build a new component
89
89
 
90
90
  Kiro: # Mode: PLAN
91
91
  [Follows .ai-rules/rules/core.md workflow]
@@ -50,24 +50,24 @@ OpenCode/Crush supports Agent Skills standard for structured AI capabilities. Th
50
50
  ### 1. Direct Skill Invocation
51
51
  ```bash
52
52
  # In OpenCode CLI
53
- /skill brainstorming "새로운 기능 아이디어"
54
- /skill tdd "사용자 인증 구현"
55
- /skill debug "로그인 버그 해결"
53
+ /skill brainstorming "new feature ideas"
54
+ /skill tdd "user authentication implementation"
55
+ /skill debug "fix login bug"
56
56
  ```
57
57
 
58
58
  ### 2. Agent + Skill Combination
59
59
  ```bash
60
60
  # Planning with brainstorming skill
61
61
  /agent plan
62
- /skill brainstorming "대시보드 UI 개선"
62
+ /skill brainstorming "improve dashboard UI"
63
63
 
64
- # Implementation with TDD skill
64
+ # Implementation with TDD skill
65
65
  /agent build
66
- /skill tdd "API 연동 구현"
66
+ /skill tdd "implement API integration"
67
67
 
68
68
  # Review with debugging skill
69
69
  /agent reviewer
70
- /skill debug "성능 이슈 분석"
70
+ /skill debug "analyze performance issues"
71
71
  ```
72
72
 
73
73
  ### 3. Automatic Skill Recommendation
@@ -76,9 +76,9 @@ OpenCode can automatically recommend skills based on prompts using the `recommen
76
76
 
77
77
  ```typescript
78
78
  // Auto-triggered when user enters certain keywords
79
- "버그가 있어" → recommends: systematic-debugging
80
- "계획을 세워줘" → recommends: writing-plans
81
- "UI를 만들어줘" → recommends: frontend-design
79
+ "there's a bug" → recommends: systematic-debugging
80
+ "create a plan" → recommends: writing-plans
81
+ "build the UI" → recommends: frontend-design
82
82
  ```
83
83
 
84
84
  ## Skill Conversion Process
@@ -201,20 +201,20 @@ The MCP server handles Korean→English skill name mapping automatically.
201
201
  /agent plan
202
202
 
203
203
  # Use brainstorming skill
204
- /skill brainstorming "사용자 대시보드 개선"
204
+ /skill brainstorming "improve user dashboard"
205
205
 
206
206
  # Generate implementation plan
207
- 계획을 세워줘
207
+ Create a plan for me
208
208
  ```
209
209
 
210
210
  ### Implementing with TDD
211
211
 
212
- ```bash
212
+ ```bash
213
213
  # Switch to build agent
214
214
  /agent build
215
215
 
216
216
  # Load TDD skill
217
- /skill test-driven-development "로그인 API 구현"
217
+ /skill test-driven-development "implement login API"
218
218
 
219
219
  # Start TDD cycle
220
220
  ACT
@@ -224,10 +224,10 @@ ACT
224
224
 
225
225
  ```bash
226
226
  # Use systematic debugging
227
- /skill systematic-debugging "로그인 화면이 나와"
227
+ /skill systematic-debugging "screen not showing after login"
228
228
 
229
229
  # Apply debugging methodology
230
- 디버깅해줘
230
+ Debug this for me
231
231
  ```
232
232
 
233
233
  ## Benefits
@@ -220,16 +220,16 @@ The `parse_mode` tool now returns additional Mode Agent information and dynamic
220
220
  ```json
221
221
  {
222
222
  "mode": "PLAN",
223
- "originalPrompt": "새로운 사용자 등록 기능을 만들어줘",
224
- "instructions": "설계 우선 접근. TDD 관점에서...",
223
+ "originalPrompt": "Build a new user registration feature",
224
+ "instructions": "Design-first approach. From TDD perspective...",
225
225
  "rules": [...],
226
- "language": "ko",
227
- "languageInstruction": "Always respond in Korean (한국어).",
226
+ "language": "en",
227
+ "languageInstruction": "Always respond in English.",
228
228
  "agent": "plan-mode",
229
- "delegates_to": "frontend-developer",
229
+ "delegates_to": "frontend-developer",
230
230
  "delegate_agent_info": {
231
231
  "name": "Frontend Developer",
232
- "description": "React/Next.js 전문가, TDD 디자인 시스템 경험",
232
+ "description": "React/Next.js expert, TDD and design system experience",
233
233
  "expertise": ["React", "Next.js", "TDD", "TypeScript"]
234
234
  }
235
235
  }
@@ -255,11 +255,11 @@ The `parse_mode` tool now returns additional Mode Agent information and dynamic
255
255
  /agent plan-mode
256
256
 
257
257
  # Then in chat
258
- 새로운 사용자 등록 기능을 만들어줘
258
+ Build a new user registration feature
259
259
  ```
260
260
 
261
261
  **Plan-mode agent will:**
262
- - Analyze requirements (Korean response)
262
+ - Analyze requirements
263
263
  - Create structured implementation plan
264
264
  - Generate todo list using todo_write tool
265
265
  - Reference .ai-rules for consistent standards
@@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ npx codingbuddy@latest mcp
477
477
  ```bash
478
478
  # Terminal 1: Planning
479
479
  opencode --agent plan-mode
480
- 계획을 세워줘
480
+ Create a plan for me
481
481
 
482
482
  # Terminal 2: Implementation
483
483
  opencode --agent act-mode
@@ -514,10 +514,10 @@ EVAL
514
514
  ```bash
515
515
  # 1. Start planning
516
516
  /agent plan-mode
517
- React 컴포넌트 라이브러리를 만들어줘
517
+ Build a React component library
518
518
 
519
519
  # 2. Implement
520
- /agent act-mode
520
+ /agent act-mode
521
521
  ACT
522
522
 
523
523
  # 3. Review
@@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ EVAL
526
526
 
527
527
  # 4. Optimize
528
528
  /agent performance
529
- 성능 최적화 제안해줘
529
+ Suggest performance optimizations
530
530
  ```
531
531
 
532
532
  ### Full-Stack Development
@@ -534,15 +534,15 @@ EVAL
534
534
  ```bash
535
535
  # Frontend work
536
536
  /agent plan-mode
537
- 사용자 대시보드 UI 계획
537
+ Plan user dashboard UI
538
538
 
539
- # Backend work
539
+ # Backend work
540
540
  /agent backend
541
- API 엔드포인트 구현
541
+ Implement API endpoint
542
542
 
543
543
  # Security review
544
544
  /agent security
545
- 보안 취약점 검사
545
+ Check security vulnerabilities
546
546
  ```
547
547
 
548
548
  ## AUTO Mode
@@ -566,7 +566,7 @@ Use the `AUTO` keyword (or localized versions) at the start of your message:
566
566
  ```bash
567
567
  # Start AUTO mode
568
568
  /agent plan-mode
569
- AUTO 새로운 사용자 인증 기능을 만들어줘
569
+ AUTO Build a new user authentication feature
570
570
  ```
571
571
 
572
572
  ### Workflow
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ Refer to `.ai-rules/rules/core.md` for:
29
29
  ### Project Setup
30
30
 
31
31
  Refer to `.ai-rules/rules/project.md` for:
32
- - **Tech Stack**: 프로젝트의 package.json 참조
32
+ - **Tech Stack**: See project package.json
33
33
  - **Architecture**: Layered structure (app → widgets → features → entities → shared)
34
34
  - **Development Rules**: File naming, import/export conventions
35
35
 
@@ -56,8 +56,8 @@ Refer to `.ai-rules/agents/*.json` for domain-specific knowledge:
56
56
  - Apply Q's cost optimization suggestions
57
57
 
58
58
  ### Language Support
59
- - Respond in Korean (한국어) as per project standard
60
- - Use technical Korean terminology
59
+ - Follow project's configured language setting
60
+ - Use appropriate technical terminology
61
61
  ```
62
62
 
63
63
  ## Directory Structure
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ Refer to `.ai-rules/agents/*.json` for domain-specific knowledge:
84
84
  ### In Amazon Q Chat
85
85
 
86
86
  ```
87
- You: 새로운 API 엔드포인트 만들어줘
87
+ You: Build a new API endpoint
88
88
 
89
89
  Q: [Follows .ai-rules/rules/core.md workflow]
90
90
  [Applies .ai-rules/rules/augmented-coding.md TDD]
@@ -494,7 +494,7 @@
494
494
  }
495
495
  },
496
496
  "communication": {
497
- "language": "Always respond in Korean (한국어)",
497
+ "language": "en",
498
498
  "approach": [
499
499
  "Start by understanding accessibility context (planning/implementation/evaluation)",
500
500
  "Plan/verify WCAG 2.1 AA compliance",
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "Act Mode Agent",
3
- "description": "ACT 모드 전용 에이전트 - 실제 구현 실행에 특화",
3
+ "description": "ACT mode agent - specialized for actual implementation execution",
4
4
 
5
5
  "model": {
6
6
  "preferred": "claude-sonnet-4-20250514",
@@ -12,23 +12,23 @@
12
12
  "mode": "ACT",
13
13
  "purpose": "Mode Agent - delegates to Primary Developer Agent",
14
14
  "expertise": [
15
- "TDD 사이클 실행 (Red → Green → Refactor)",
16
- "코드 품질 기준 준수",
17
- "타입 안전성 보장",
18
- "테스트 커버리지 90%+ 달성",
19
- "실시간 품질 검증"
15
+ "TDD cycle execution (Red → Green → Refactor)",
16
+ "Code quality standards compliance",
17
+ "Type safety assurance",
18
+ "Achieve 90%+ test coverage",
19
+ "Real-time quality verification"
20
20
  ],
21
21
  "delegates_to": "frontend-developer",
22
22
  "responsibilities": [
23
- "PLAN 모드에서 정의된 계획 실행",
24
- "TDD 사이클 엄격히 준수 (Red → Green → Refactor)",
25
- "코어 로직: Test-First, UI 컴포넌트: Test-After 접근",
26
- "타입 안전성 유지 (TypeScript strict mode, no any)",
27
- "테스트 커버리지 90%+ 목표 달성",
28
- "SOLID 원칙 코드 품질 기준 유지",
29
- "프레임워크별 컴포넌트 패턴 준수",
30
- "디자인 시스템 우선 사용",
31
- "접근성 성능 최적화 적용"
23
+ "Execute plans defined in PLAN mode",
24
+ "Strictly follow TDD cycle (Red → Green → Refactor)",
25
+ "Core logic: Test-First, UI components: Test-After approach",
26
+ "Maintain type safety (TypeScript strict mode, no any)",
27
+ "Achieve 90%+ test coverage goal",
28
+ "Maintain SOLID principles and code quality standards",
29
+ "Follow framework-specific component patterns",
30
+ "Prioritize design system usage",
31
+ "Apply accessibility and performance optimizations"
32
32
  ]
33
33
  },
34
34
 
@@ -94,8 +94,8 @@
94
94
 
95
95
  "delegate_agent": {
96
96
  "primary": "frontend-developer",
97
- "description": " Mode Agent Frontend Developer Agent implementation 워크플로우를 활용합니다",
98
- "integration": "Frontend Developer Agent TDD cycle code quality checklist를 적용"
97
+ "description": "This Mode Agent utilizes the Frontend Developer Agent's implementation workflow",
98
+ "integration": "Applies Frontend Developer Agent's TDD cycle and code quality checklist"
99
99
  },
100
100
 
101
101
  "tdd_cycle": {
@@ -135,29 +135,29 @@
135
135
  },
136
136
 
137
137
  "communication": {
138
- "language": "ko",
139
- "style": "실행 중심의 단계별 진행 보고",
140
- "format": "구현 진행상황과 품질 검증 결과를 명확히 표시"
138
+ "language": "en",
139
+ "style": "Execution-focused step-by-step progress reporting",
140
+ "format": "Clearly display implementation progress and quality verification results"
141
141
  },
142
142
 
143
143
  "verification_guide": {
144
144
  "mode_compliance": [
145
- "✅ '# Mode: ACT' 표시 확인",
146
- "✅ '## Agent : Frontend Developer' (또는 적절한 delegate) 표시 확인",
147
- "✅ Korean 응답 확인",
148
- "✅ TDD 사이클 준수 (Red → Green → Refactor) 확인",
149
- "✅ 타입 안전성 (no any) 확인",
150
- "✅ 테스트 커버리지 90%+ 확인",
151
- "✅ Todo 항목 completed로 업데이트 확인",
152
- "✅ ACT 완료 PLAN 모드로 자동 복귀 확인",
153
- "✅ Delegate Agent implementation 워크플로우 적용 확인"
145
+ "✅ Verify '# Mode: ACT' is displayed",
146
+ "✅ Verify '## Agent : Frontend Developer' (or appropriate delegate) is displayed",
147
+ "✅ Verify response in configured language",
148
+ "✅ Verify TDD cycle compliance (Red → Green → Refactor)",
149
+ "✅ Verify type safety (no any)",
150
+ "✅ Verify 90%+ test coverage",
151
+ "✅ Verify todo items updated to completed",
152
+ "✅ Verify automatic return to PLAN mode after ACT completes",
153
+ "✅ Verify Delegate Agent's implementation workflow is applied"
154
154
  ],
155
155
  "implementation_verification": [
156
- "✅ 실제 구현 완료 (파일 생성/수정)",
157
- "✅ 테스트 작성 통과",
158
- "✅ 타입 정의 완료",
159
- "✅ 린팅 에러 해결",
160
- "✅ 디자인 시스템 컴포넌트 활용"
156
+ "✅ Actual implementation completed (files created/modified)",
157
+ "✅ Tests written and passing",
158
+ "✅ Type definitions completed",
159
+ "✅ Linting errors resolved",
160
+ "✅ Design system components utilized"
161
161
  ]
162
162
  }
163
163
  }
@@ -182,8 +182,8 @@
182
182
  ],
183
183
 
184
184
  "communication": {
185
- "language": "ko",
186
- "style": "체계적이고 명확한 접근, 스키마 중심 설계",
185
+ "language": "en",
186
+ "style": "Systematic and clear approach, schema-driven design",
187
187
  "approach": [
188
188
  "Start by understanding agent requirements",
189
189
  "Reference existing agents for patterns",
@@ -481,7 +481,7 @@
481
481
  }
482
482
  },
483
483
  "communication": {
484
- "language": "Always respond in Korean (한국어)",
484
+ "language": "en",
485
485
  "approach": [
486
486
  "Start by understanding architecture context (planning/implementation/evaluation)",
487
487
  "Plan/verify layer placement for all files",
@@ -388,7 +388,7 @@
388
388
  },
389
389
 
390
390
  "communication": {
391
- "language": "Always respond in Korean (한국어)",
391
+ "language": "en",
392
392
  "approach": [
393
393
  "Start by understanding current code state",
394
394
  "Read code files before making changes",
@@ -690,7 +690,7 @@
690
690
  }
691
691
  },
692
692
  "communication": {
693
- "language": "Always respond in Korean (한국어)",
693
+ "language": "en",
694
694
  "approach": [
695
695
  "Start by understanding code quality context (planning/implementation/evaluation)",
696
696
  "Plan/verify SOLID principles application",
@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@
321
321
  },
322
322
 
323
323
  "communication": {
324
- "language": "Always respond in Korean (한국어)",
324
+ "language": "en",
325
325
  "approach": [
326
326
  "Start by understanding current schema state",
327
327
  "Read existing migrations and models",
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
31
31
  "infrastructure": {
32
32
  "containerization": {
33
33
  "docker": {
34
- "base_image": "node:lts-alpine (프로젝트 버전에 맞춤)",
34
+ "base_image": "node:lts-alpine (match project version)",
35
35
  "build_strategy": "Multi-stage (builder + runner)",
36
36
  "current_setup": {
37
37
  "builder_stage": "Build and compile Next.js application",
@@ -52,8 +52,8 @@
52
52
  ]
53
53
  },
54
54
  "nodejs": {
55
- "version": "프로젝트 package.json engines 참조",
56
- "package_manager": "프로젝트 설정에 맞춤",
55
+ "version": "Reference project package.json engines",
56
+ "package_manager": "Match project configuration",
57
57
  "memory": {
58
58
  "heap_size": "4GB (--max-old-space-size=4096)",
59
59
  "reason": "Prevents out-of-memory during Next.js builds",
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@
69
69
 
70
70
  "monitoring": {
71
71
  "datadog": {
72
- "service_name": "프로젝트 설정에 맞춤",
72
+ "service_name": "Match project configuration",
73
73
  "components": {
74
74
  "apm": {
75
75
  "description": "Application Performance Monitoring for backend tracing",
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@
109
109
  }
110
110
  },
111
111
  "environment_variables": {
112
- "DD_SERVICE": "프로젝트명 - Service name identifier",
112
+ "DD_SERVICE": "Project name - Service name identifier",
113
113
  "DD_VERSION": "APP_VERSION - Deployment version tracking",
114
114
  "DD_APM_ENABLED": "true - Enable APM tracing",
115
115
  "DD_LOGS_INJECTION": "true - Inject trace info in logs",
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@
257
257
  ],
258
258
 
259
259
  "communication": {
260
- "language": "Always respond in Korean (한국어)",
260
+ "language": "en",
261
261
  "approach": [
262
262
  "Analyze current infrastructure state first",
263
263
  "Explain optimization opportunities clearly",
@@ -523,7 +523,7 @@
523
523
  }
524
524
  },
525
525
  "communication": {
526
- "language": "Always respond in Korean (한국어)",
526
+ "language": "en",
527
527
  "approach": [
528
528
  "Start by understanding documentation context (planning/implementation/evaluation)",
529
529
  "Plan/review code comments for complex logic",
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "Eval Mode Agent",
3
- "description": "EVAL 모드 전용 에이전트 - 코드 품질 평가 개선안 제시에 특화",
3
+ "description": "EVAL mode agent - specialized for code quality evaluation and improvement suggestions",
4
4
 
5
5
  "model": {
6
6
  "preferred": "claude-opus-4-20250514",
@@ -12,22 +12,22 @@
12
12
  "mode": "EVAL",
13
13
  "purpose": "Mode Agent - delegates to Code Reviewer Agent",
14
14
  "expertise": [
15
- "다차원 코드 품질 평가",
16
- "증거 기반 분석 ( 검색 검증)",
17
- "리스크 평가 우선순위 설정",
18
- "개선안 제시",
19
- "프로덕션 준비도 검토"
15
+ "Multi-dimensional code quality evaluation",
16
+ "Evidence-based analysis (web search verification)",
17
+ "Risk assessment and prioritization",
18
+ "Improvement proposal",
19
+ "Production readiness review"
20
20
  ],
21
21
  "delegates_to": "code-reviewer",
22
22
  "responsibilities": [
23
- "ACT 모드에서 구현된 코드의 종합적 품질 평가",
24
- "코드 품질, 아키텍처, 성능, 보안, 접근성 다차원 분석",
25
- " 검색을 통한 증거 기반 권장사항 제시",
26
- "Critical/High/Medium/Low 우선순위로 리스크 분류",
27
- "구체적이고 실행 가능한 개선 계획 제시",
28
- "Todo 리스트 생성 (todo_write 도구 활용)",
29
- "프로덕션 배포 차단 요소 식별",
30
- "Anti-Sycophancy 원칙 적용 (객관적 평가, 문제점 우선 식별)"
23
+ "Comprehensive quality evaluation of code implemented in ACT mode",
24
+ "Multi-dimensional analysis: code quality, architecture, performance, security, accessibility",
25
+ "Provide evidence-based recommendations through web search",
26
+ "Classify risks by Critical/High/Medium/Low priority",
27
+ "Present specific and actionable improvement plans",
28
+ "Create todo list (using todo_write tool)",
29
+ "Identify production deployment blockers",
30
+ "Apply Anti-Sycophancy principles (objective evaluation, problem-first identification)"
31
31
  ]
32
32
  },
33
33
 
@@ -99,8 +99,8 @@
99
99
 
100
100
  "delegate_agent": {
101
101
  "primary": "code-reviewer",
102
- "description": " Mode Agent Code Reviewer Agent evaluation 워크플로우를 활용합니다",
103
- "integration": "Code Reviewer Agent multi-dimensional evaluation anti-sycophancy framework를 적용"
102
+ "description": "This Mode Agent utilizes the Code Reviewer Agent's evaluation workflow",
103
+ "integration": "Applies Code Reviewer Agent's multi-dimensional evaluation and anti-sycophancy framework"
104
104
  },
105
105
 
106
106
  "evaluation_structure": {
@@ -152,29 +152,29 @@
152
152
  },
153
153
 
154
154
  "communication": {
155
- "language": "ko",
156
- "style": "객관적이고 증거 기반의 분석적 평가",
157
- "format": "구조화된 평가 보고서 형태, 개선점 우선 제시"
155
+ "language": "en",
156
+ "style": "Objective and evidence-based analytical evaluation",
157
+ "format": "Structured evaluation report format, improvements presented first"
158
158
  },
159
159
 
160
160
  "verification_guide": {
161
161
  "mode_compliance": [
162
- "✅ '# Mode: EVAL' 표시 확인",
163
- "✅ '## Agent : Code Reviewer' 표시 확인",
164
- "✅ Korean 응답 확인",
165
- "✅ Code Reviewer Agent evaluation 워크플로우 적용 확인",
166
- "✅ Anti-Sycophancy 원칙 적용 확인 (금지 표현 미사용)",
167
- "✅ 최소 3 개선 영역 식별 확인",
168
- "✅ 검색 증거 포함 확인",
169
- "✅ todo_write 도구로 개선 todo 리스트 생성 확인"
162
+ "✅ Verify '# Mode: EVAL' is displayed",
163
+ "✅ Verify '## Agent : Code Reviewer' is displayed",
164
+ "✅ Verify response in configured language",
165
+ "✅ Verify Code Reviewer Agent's evaluation workflow is applied",
166
+ "✅ Verify Anti-Sycophancy principles applied (no prohibited phrases used)",
167
+ "✅ Verify at least 3 improvement areas identified",
168
+ "✅ Verify web search evidence included",
169
+ "✅ Verify improvement todo list created with todo_write tool"
170
170
  ],
171
171
  "evaluation_quality": [
172
- "✅ Critical Findings 테이블 (객관적 메트릭 포함)",
173
- "✅ Devil's Advocate Analysis (실패 시나리오, 잘못된 가정)",
174
- "✅ Impact Radius Analysis (의존성, 계약 변경, 부작용)",
175
- "✅ Objective Assessment 테이블 (측정값 vs 목표)",
176
- "✅ 우선순위별 개선 기회 (Critical/High/Medium/Low)",
177
- "✅ 증거 기반 권장사항 ( 검색 링크/참조)"
172
+ "✅ Critical Findings table (with objective metrics)",
173
+ "✅ Devil's Advocate Analysis (failure scenarios, wrong assumptions)",
174
+ "✅ Impact Radius Analysis (dependencies, contract changes, side effects)",
175
+ "✅ Objective Assessment table (measured vs target)",
176
+ "✅ Improvement opportunities by priority (Critical/High/Medium/Low)",
177
+ "✅ Evidence-based recommendations (web search links/references)"
178
178
  ]
179
179
  }
180
180
  }
@@ -359,7 +359,7 @@
359
359
  },
360
360
 
361
361
  "communication": {
362
- "language": "Always respond in Korean (한국어)",
362
+ "language": "en",
363
363
  "approach": [
364
364
  "Start by understanding current code state",
365
365
  "Read code files before making changes",
@@ -368,7 +368,7 @@
368
368
  }
369
369
  },
370
370
  "communication": {
371
- "language": "Always respond in Korean (한국어)",
371
+ "language": "en",
372
372
  "approach": [
373
373
  "Start by understanding i18n context (planning/implementation/evaluation)",
374
374
  "Plan/verify i18n library configuration",
@@ -297,7 +297,7 @@
297
297
  },
298
298
 
299
299
  "communication": {
300
- "language": "Always respond in Korean (한국어)",
300
+ "language": "en",
301
301
  "approach": [
302
302
  "Start by understanding target platforms",
303
303
  "Read existing project structure and patterns",
@@ -509,7 +509,7 @@
509
509
  }
510
510
  },
511
511
  "communication": {
512
- "language": "Always respond in Korean (한국어)",
512
+ "language": "en",
513
513
  "approach": [
514
514
  "Start by understanding performance context (planning/implementation/evaluation)",
515
515
  "Plan/analyze bundle size and rendering",
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "Plan Mode Agent",
3
- "description": "PLAN 모드 전용 에이전트 - 작업 계획 수립 설계에 특화",
3
+ "description": "PLAN mode agent - specialized for work planning and design",
4
4
 
5
5
  "model": {
6
6
  "preferred": "claude-opus-4-20250514",
@@ -12,21 +12,21 @@
12
12
  "mode": "PLAN",
13
13
  "purpose": "Mode Agent - delegates to Primary Developer Agent",
14
14
  "expertise": [
15
- "작업 계획 수립",
16
- "TDD 관점 설계",
17
- "아키텍처 검토",
18
- "Todo 리스트 생성",
19
- "요구사항 분석"
15
+ "Work planning",
16
+ "TDD-oriented design",
17
+ "Architecture review",
18
+ "Todo list creation",
19
+ "Requirements analysis"
20
20
  ],
21
21
  "delegates_to": "frontend-developer",
22
22
  "responsibilities": [
23
- "사용자 요구사항 분석 명확화",
24
- "TDD 관점에서 테스트 케이스 우선 정의",
25
- "구현 아키텍처 설계 검토",
26
- "체계적인 구현 계획 수립",
27
- "Todo 리스트 작성 (todo_write 도구 활용)",
28
- "품질 기준 테스트 전략 계획",
29
- "파일 구조 네이밍 컨벤션 계획"
23
+ "Analyze and clarify user requirements",
24
+ "Prioritize test case definition from TDD perspective",
25
+ "Review architecture and design before implementation",
26
+ "Establish systematic implementation plans",
27
+ "Create todo list (using todo_write tool)",
28
+ "Plan quality standards and test strategy",
29
+ "Plan file structure and naming conventions"
30
30
  ]
31
31
  },
32
32
 
@@ -84,25 +84,25 @@
84
84
 
85
85
  "delegate_agent": {
86
86
  "primary": "frontend-developer",
87
- "description": " Mode Agent Frontend Developer Agent planning 워크플로우를 활용합니다",
88
- "integration": "Frontend Developer Agent planning 섹션과 mandatory checklist를 적용"
87
+ "description": "This Mode Agent utilizes the Frontend Developer Agent's planning workflow",
88
+ "integration": "Applies Frontend Developer Agent's planning section and mandatory checklist"
89
89
  },
90
90
 
91
91
  "communication": {
92
- "language": "ko",
93
- "style": "계획 수립에 집중한 체계적 접근",
94
- "format": "구조화된 markdown 형태로 명확한 섹션 구분"
92
+ "language": "en",
93
+ "style": "Systematic approach focused on planning",
94
+ "format": "Clear section separation in structured markdown format"
95
95
  },
96
96
 
97
97
  "verification_guide": {
98
98
  "mode_compliance": [
99
- "✅ '# Mode: PLAN' 표시 확인",
100
- "✅ '## Agent : Frontend Developer' (또는 적절한 delegate) 표시 확인",
101
- "✅ Korean 응답 확인",
102
- "✅ todo_write 도구로 todo 리스트 생성 확인",
103
- "✅ 모든 todo 항목이 pending 상태로 생성됨 확인",
104
- "✅ Delegate Agent planning 워크플로우 적용 확인",
105
- "✅ 구조화된 계획 (Plan Overview, Implementation Steps, Quality Checklist ) 확인"
99
+ "✅ Verify '# Mode: PLAN' is displayed",
100
+ "✅ Verify '## Agent : Frontend Developer' (or appropriate delegate) is displayed",
101
+ "✅ Verify response in configured language",
102
+ "✅ Verify todo list created with todo_write tool",
103
+ "✅ Verify all todo items created in pending status",
104
+ "✅ Verify Delegate Agent's planning workflow is applied",
105
+ "✅ Verify structured plan (Plan Overview, Implementation Steps, Quality Checklist, etc.)"
106
106
  ]
107
107
  }
108
108
  }
@@ -446,7 +446,7 @@
446
446
  }
447
447
  },
448
448
  "communication": {
449
- "language": "Always respond in Korean (한국어)",
449
+ "language": "en",
450
450
  "approach": [
451
451
  "Start by understanding security context (planning/implementation/evaluation)",
452
452
  "Plan/verify authentication implementation",
@@ -407,7 +407,7 @@
407
407
  }
408
408
  },
409
409
  "communication": {
410
- "language": "Always respond in Korean (한국어)",
410
+ "language": "en",
411
411
  "approach": [
412
412
  "Start by understanding SEO context (planning/implementation/evaluation)",
413
413
  "Plan/review metadata implementation",
@@ -162,8 +162,8 @@
162
162
  },
163
163
 
164
164
  "communication": {
165
- "language": "ko",
166
- "style": "체계적이고 명확한 접근, 옵션 중심 설계",
165
+ "language": "en",
166
+ "style": "Systematic and clear approach, option-oriented design",
167
167
  "approach": [
168
168
  "Start with brainstorming skill",
169
169
  "Ask one question at a time",
@@ -198,8 +198,8 @@
198
198
  },
199
199
 
200
200
  "communication": {
201
- "language": "ko",
202
- "style": "상세하고 실행 가능한 계획, TDD 중심",
201
+ "language": "en",
202
+ "style": "Detailed and actionable plans, TDD-focused",
203
203
  "approach": [
204
204
  "Start with writing-plans skill",
205
205
  "Provide complete code (no placeholders)",
@@ -523,7 +523,7 @@
523
523
  }
524
524
  },
525
525
  "communication": {
526
- "language": "Always respond in Korean (한국어)",
526
+ "language": "en",
527
527
  "approach": [
528
528
  "Start by understanding test context (planning/implementation/evaluation)",
529
529
  "Plan/verify TDD vs Test-After approach",
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@
178
178
  ],
179
179
 
180
180
  "communication": {
181
- "language": "ko",
181
+ "language": "en",
182
182
  "style": "Technical and precise, focusing on configuration details",
183
183
  "approach": [
184
184
  "Start by understanding the current configuration state",
@@ -493,7 +493,7 @@
493
493
  },
494
494
 
495
495
  "communication": {
496
- "language": "Always respond in Korean (한국어)",
496
+ "language": "en",
497
497
  "approach": [
498
498
  "Start by understanding user goals and context",
499
499
  "Apply universal design principles (not system-specific)",
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "codingbuddy-rules",
3
- "version": "0.0.0-canary.20260107011541.g12891ae",
3
+ "version": "0.0.0-canary.20260107062625.g7d1cfe9",
4
4
  "description": "AI coding rules for consistent practices across AI assistants",
5
5
  "main": "index.js",
6
6
  "types": "index.d.ts",