codex-genesis-harness 0.1.1 → 0.1.4

package/.codex/skills/genesis-docs-automation/agents/openai.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+interface:
+  display_name: "Docs Automation Skill"
+  short_description: "Automatically sync documentation with code changes across all phases"
+  default_prompt: "Use $genesis-docs-automation to synchronize documentation with the latest code changes."
+
+policy:
+  allow_implicit_invocation: true

package/.codex/skills/genesis-docs-automation/checklists/docs-validation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,359 @@
+# Docs Validation Checklist
+
+**Purpose**: Pre-update verification checklist to catch incomplete/broken documentation before processing
+
+**When to Use**: 
+- After code changes detected
+- Before auto-doc generation
+- During manual `/update-docs` invocation
+
+---
+
+## 📋 Pre-Validation: Is Documentation Update Needed?
+
+- [ ] At least one file changed in Phase 1-5 (contract/backend/SDK/test)?
+- [ ] Tests passing? (Required for auto-trigger)
+- [ ] Changed files are tracked in Git? (No local-only changes)
+- [ ] Changes are committed/staged (not just pending)?
+
+**If any unchecked**: Stop here, resolve first, then re-run
+
+---
+
+## 🔍 Phase 1: Contract Change Detection
+
+### If API Contract Changed (contracts/api/*/request.json or response.json)
+
+**Contract Validation**:
+- [ ] request.json has valid JSON schema
+- [ ] response.json has valid JSON schema  
+- [ ] error.json has valid error code map
+- [ ] All required fields marked as such
+- [ ] Type definitions are precise (string vs enum, number vs range)
+- [ ] Examples provided for each request/response type
+
+**Doc Requirements**:
+- [ ] API_REFERENCE.md needs update (endpoint details)
+- [ ] SPEC_CHANGELOG.md needs entry (what changed)
+- [ ] IMPLEMENTATION_HANDOFF.md may need update (if breaking)
+- [ ] Examples need code samples in 2+ languages (JS, Python)
+
+**Change Classification**:
+
+Is this a BREAKING change?
+- [ ] Removed required field? **YES** → BREAKING
+- [ ] Changed field type? (e.g., string → number) **YES** → BREAKING
+- [ ] Changed response structure? **YES** → BREAKING
+- [ ] Changed endpoint URL? **YES** → BREAKING
+- [ ] Changed error codes? **YES** → BREAKING
+
+If ANY yes: **MARK AS BREAKING** (requires manual review gate)
+
+Is this a FEATURE change?
+- [ ] Added new optional field? **YES** → FEATURE
+- [ ] Added new endpoint? **YES** → FEATURE
+- [ ] Made required field optional? **YES** → FEATURE (backward compatible)
+- [ ] Added new error code? **YES** → FEATURE
+
+If ANY yes: **MARK AS FEATURE** (auto-update OK, provide migration guide)
+
+Otherwise: **MARK AS BUG_FIX or INTERNAL**
+
+---
+
+## 🔄 Phase 2: Test File Changes
+
+### If Test Files Changed (tests/unit, tests/integration, playwright/e2e)
+
+**Test Validation**:
+- [ ] All tests passing (must have 0 failures)
+- [ ] Test file has clear description of what's being tested
+- [ ] New test cases have proper setup/teardown
+- [ ] Mock data matches expected schema
+- [ ] No hardcoded IDs or timestamps (use factories)
+
+**Doc Requirements**:
+- [ ] If new integration test: Add scenario to IMPLEMENTATION.md
+- [ ] If new E2E test: Add user flow to docs
+- [ ] SPEC_CHANGELOG.md: Add "Test Coverage" section if new major scenario
+- [ ] Update test coverage % in IMPLEMENTATION_HANDOFF.md
+
+**Test Categorization**:
+- [ ] Unit tests: Testing individual functions
+- [ ] Integration tests: Testing API endpoint + database
+- [ ] E2E tests: Testing user flows across UI + API
+- [ ] Performance tests: Testing response times
+- [ ] Error tests: Testing error handling
+
+---
+
+## 💾 Phase 3: Backend Implementation Changes
+
+### If Backend Files Changed (src/api/handlers, src/services, src/database)
+
+**Code Quality**:
+- [ ] Code has docstrings/comments explaining logic
+- [ ] Error handling is explicit (no silent failures)
+- [ ] Database queries are indexed (if new queries)
+- [ ] Performance is acceptable (check test results for timing)
+- [ ] Security implications noted (auth, validation, SQL injection)
+
+**Doc Requirements**:
+- [ ] API_REFERENCE.md: Updated if endpoint changed
+- [ ] IMPLEMENTATION.md: Added key code locations
+- [ ] ARCHITECTURE.md: Updated if data flow changed
+- [ ] SPEC_CHANGELOG.md: Entry with implementation notes
+- [ ] IMPLEMENTATION_HANDOFF.md: Updated with next steps
+- [ ] Docstrings: Added/updated for public methods
+
+**Implementation Category**:
+- [ ] New handler: Needs full API docs + implementation guide
+- [ ] Modified handler: Needs updated API docs + changelog
+- [ ] New service: Needs architecture docs + implementation guide
+- [ ] Modified service: Needs updated architecture docs
+- [ ] Database change: Needs migration guide + schema docs
+- [ ] Error handling: Needs error code documentation
+
+---
+
+## 📱 Phase 4: SDK/Client Changes
+
+### If SDK Files Changed (src/client/*, src/types/*)
+
+**Type Validation**:
+- [ ] All TypeScript types compile without errors
+- [ ] Type definitions match backend schema (Phase 3)
+- [ ] No `any` types without justification
+- [ ] Generic types properly constrained
+- [ ] Deprecation warnings added for old methods
+
+**Doc Requirements**:
+- [ ] API Reference: Updated with new methods
+- [ ] Type definitions documented with examples
+- [ ] SPEC_CHANGELOG.md: Entry with SDK changes
+- [ ] IMPLEMENTATION_HANDOFF.md: Updated with next phase steps
+- [ ] Migration guide: Provided if breaking change
+- [ ] Code examples: Added in docs for new methods
+
+**SDK Change Type**:
+- [ ] New method: Needs documentation + example
+- [ ] Modified method: Needs updated documentation
+- [ ] Deprecated method: Needs migration guide
+- [ ] New type: Needs type reference documentation
+- [ ] Type change: Breaking change, needs migration guide
+
+---
+
+## 🎯 Phase 5: E2E Test Changes
+
+### If E2E Test Files Changed (playwright/e2e/*.spec.ts)
+
+**Test Scenario Validation**:
+- [ ] Each scenario tests a complete user flow
+- [ ] Scenarios are independent (no test ordering)
+- [ ] Assertions match expected behavior
+- [ ] Error scenarios included (not just happy path)
+- [ ] Page objects used (not hardcoded selectors)
+
+**Doc Requirements**:
+- [ ] User flows documented in IMPLEMENTATION.md
+- [ ] Scenario names match documentation
+- [ ] SPEC_CHANGELOG.md: New scenarios noted
+- [ ] IMPLEMENTATION_HANDOFF.md: Test coverage updated
+- [ ] Examples provided for each scenario
+
+**Scenario Classification**:
+- [ ] Happy path: Normal user flow
+- [ ] Error case: User makes mistake
+- [ ] Edge case: Unusual but valid scenario
+- [ ] Regression: Previous bug that came back
+- [ ] Performance: Testing under load
+
+---
+
+## ✅ Cross-Phase Consistency Check
+
+### Contract ↔ Implementation Alignment
+
+- [ ] Phase 1 endpoint in API contract → Phase 3 handler exists?
+- [ ] Phase 1 request schema → Phase 3 validation matches?
+- [ ] Phase 1 response schema → Phase 3 handler response matches?
+- [ ] Phase 1 error codes → Phase 3 error handling matches?
+- [ ] Phase 1 response fields → Phase 2 test mocks match?
+
+**If misaligned**: 🔴 STOP - Document conflict in DOCS_UPDATE_LOG.md
+
+### Implementation ↔ SDK Alignment
+
+- [ ] Phase 3 API response → Phase 4 type definitions match?
+- [ ] Phase 3 error codes → Phase 4 error handling matches?
+- [ ] Phase 3 data flow → Phase 4 client flow matches?
+- [ ] New Phase 3 fields → Phase 4 types include them?
+
+**If misaligned**: 🔴 STOP - Document conflict in DOCS_UPDATE_LOG.md
+
+### SDK ↔ E2E Alignment
+
+- [ ] Phase 4 SDK methods → Phase 5 E2E tests use them?
+- [ ] Phase 4 type definitions → Phase 5 test data matches?
+- [ ] Phase 4 error handling → Phase 5 error scenarios match?
+
+**If misaligned**: 🔴 STOP - Document conflict in DOCS_UPDATE_LOG.md
+
+---
+
+## 🚨 Manual Review Decision Gate
+
+If ANY of these apply, require manual review (don't auto-proceed):
+
+### 🔴 ALWAYS MANUAL (Critical)
+
+- [ ] **BREAKING change** detected (field removed, type changed, etc.)
+- [ ] **Phase misalignment** detected (contract ≠ implementation)
+- [ ] **Security change** (auth, validation, encryption related)
+- [ ] **Database schema change** (new table, column removal)
+- [ ] **Error code change** (new error, changed error behavior)
+- [ ] **Performance regression** (response time increased >10%)
+- [ ] **Deprecated endpoint** without migration guide
+
+### 🟡 MANUAL RECOMMENDED (High Value)
+
+- [ ] **New public API** (new endpoint or public method)
+- [ ] **Architecture change** (new service, new module, data flow change)
+- [ ] **Significant refactoring** (>50 lines changed in critical path)
+- [ ] **Third-party library update** (new dependency or major version bump)
+- [ ] **Cross-phase impact** (changes affect multiple phases)
+
+### 🟢 AUTO OK (Standard)
+
+- [ ] Feature addition (new optional field, new optional method)
+- [ ] Bug fix (behavior corrected, backward compatible)
+- [ ] Test addition (new test cases for existing features)
+- [ ] Documentation update (comments, examples, guides)
+- [ ] Internal refactoring (no behavior change, single module)
+
+---
+
+## 📝 Docs Completeness Checklist
+
+### If Documentation Update Flagged, Verify:
+
+**API Documentation**:
+- [ ] All endpoints documented (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE)
+- [ ] Request parameters documented (required, optional, types)
+- [ ] Response schema documented with example JSON
+- [ ] Error codes documented (code, message, cause, resolution)
+- [ ] Code examples in 2+ languages (JavaScript, Python)
+- [ ] Rate limits noted (if applicable)
+- [ ] Authentication requirements noted
+
+**Implementation Documentation**:
+- [ ] File locations referenced (src/api/handlers/xxx.ts, etc.)
+- [ ] Line numbers accurate (spot-check a few)
+- [ ] Docstring examples compile/run
+- [ ] Error handling strategy explained
+- [ ] Performance characteristics noted (if critical path)
+- [ ] Security implications noted (if applicable)
+- [ ] Design decisions explained (why this approach?)
+
+**Architecture Documentation**:
+- [ ] Data flow diagram updated (if applicable)
+- [ ] Service interactions documented
+- [ ] Cache strategy documented (if added)
+- [ ] External API dependencies noted
+- [ ] Scalability considerations noted
+- [ ] Failure scenarios documented
+
+**Changelog Documentation**:
+- [ ] Change type correct (BREAKING, FEATURE, BUG_FIX)
+- [ ] Change severity matches impact
+- [ ] Migration guide provided for breaking changes
+- [ ] Timeline clear for deprecations
+- [ ] Examples provided for new features
+- [ ] Related resources linked (API ref, implementation guide)
+
+**Handoff Documentation**:
+- [ ] Phase completion status clear (✅ what's done)
+- [ ] Testing checklist provided for next phase
+- [ ] Known issues documented (severity, workarounds)
+- [ ] Next steps clear (what Phase 4 needs to do)
+- [ ] Open questions documented
+- [ ] Contact info for questions
+
+---
+
+## 🎯 Final Sign-Off Checklist
+
+Before marking docs update COMPLETE:
+
+**Syntax Validation**:
+- [ ] All markdown files compile without errors
+- [ ] All code blocks properly syntax-highlighted
+- [ ] All links internally valid (cross-references work)
+- [ ] No broken image references
+- [ ] Frontmatter (if used) valid YAML/JSON
+
+**Content Validation**:
+- [ ] No TODO markers remain (🚫 "TODO: document this")
+- [ ] No placeholder text ("Placeholder for API docs")
+- [ ] All examples tested (code runs without errors)
+- [ ] All file paths exist (spot-check a few)
+- [ ] All line numbers accurate (spot-check a few)
+
+**Consistency Validation**:
+- [ ] Terminology consistent (API vs Backend, User vs Account)
+- [ ] Formatting consistent (markdown headers, code blocks)
+- [ ] Tone consistent (technical, not marketing)
+- [ ] All promises kept (referenced features exist)
+
+**Phase Alignment**:
+- [ ] Phase 1 contract ⊂ Phase 3 implementation ✓
+- [ ] Phase 3 response ⊂ Phase 4 types ✓
+- [ ] Phase 4 types ⊂ Phase 5 tests ✓
+- [ ] All layers agree on field names, types ✓
+
+**Update Complete**: ✅ Ready for commit
+
+---
+
+## 📊 Validation Results Template
+
+```
+DOCS VALIDATION REPORT
+Generated: [timestamp]
+Change: [brief description]
+
+CONTRACT CHANGES: [0-N]
+- [endpoint/field] - [change type]
+
+TEST CHANGES: [0-N] 
+- [test name] - [scenario]
+
+BACKEND CHANGES: [0-N]
+- [file] - [type of change]
+
+SDK CHANGES: [0-N]
+- [method/type] - [change type]
+
+E2E CHANGES: [0-N]
+- [scenario] - [user flow]
+
+PHASE ALIGNMENT: ✅ All phases aligned
+MANUAL REVIEW GATE: ⚠️ BREAKING CHANGE - Manual review required
+
+DOCS GENERATED:
+- ✅ API_REFERENCE.md updated
+- ✅ IMPLEMENTATION.md updated
+- ✅ ARCHITECTURE.md updated
+- ✅ SPEC_CHANGELOG.md entry added
+- ⚠️ IMPLEMENTATION_HANDOFF.md incomplete (flagged for manual review)
+
+STATUS: ⚠️ CONDITIONAL COMPLETE
+- Auto-update: ✅ DONE
+- Manual review: ⏳ REQUIRED (breaking change gate)
+- Ready for commit: ❌ NO (awaiting manual approval)
+```
+
+---
+
+**Last Updated**: May 31, 2026 | **Status**: ACTIVE

package/.codex/skills/genesis-docs-automation/checklists/spec-alignment.md

@@ -0,0 +1,312 @@
+# Spec-Alignment Checklist
+
+**Purpose**: Verify that all phases are aligned on specs, types, and data contracts
+
+**When to Use**: During doc validation phase, before marking docs ready for commit
+
+---
+
+## 🔗 Cross-Layer Type Alignment
+
+### Phase 1 → Phase 3 Alignment (Contract → Backend)
+
+**For each endpoint in Phase 1 API contract**:
+
+**GET /api/users/{id}**
+- [ ] Phase 1 spec defines response: `{ id: string, email: string, name?: string }`
+- [ ] Phase 3 handler returns exactly this structure (no extra fields)
+- [ ] Phase 3 type definition: `interface User { id: string; email: string; name?: string; }`
+- [ ] No optional fields in Phase 1 become required in Phase 3
+- [ ] No required fields in Phase 1 are optional in Phase 3
+
+**POST /api/users**
+- [ ] Phase 1 request schema matches Phase 3 handler parameters
+- [ ] Phase 1 request validation rules enforced in Phase 3
+- [ ] Phase 1 response schema matches Phase 3 handler response
+- [ ] No type coercion surprises (string "123" vs number 123)
+
+### Phase 3 → Phase 4 Alignment (Backend → SDK)
+
+**For each type in Phase 3 backend**:
+
+- [ ] Phase 3 response `{ id, email, name }` → Phase 4 type `User`
+- [ ] Phase 4 type includes all fields from Phase 3 (nothing lost)
+- [ ] Phase 4 optional fields match Phase 3 optional fields
+- [ ] Phase 4 methods signature matches Phase 3 API behavior
+- [ ] Phase 4 error handling matches Phase 3 error codes
+
+### Phase 4 → Phase 5 Alignment (SDK → E2E Tests)
+
+**For each SDK method used in Phase 5**:
+
+- [ ] Phase 5 test calls `userService.getUser(id)` → Phase 4 method exists
+- [ ] Phase 5 test expects type `{ id, email, name }` → Phase 4 type matches
+- [ ] Phase 5 test error handling matches Phase 4 SDK errors
+- [ ] Phase 5 test data setup uses Phase 4 types/methods
+
+---
+
+## 🔄 Data Flow Alignment
+
+### End-to-End User Data Flow
+
+**Scenario**: User registers, profile updated, retrieved
+
+**Phase 1 Contract**:
+```json
+POST /api/users/register {
+  "email": "user@example.com",
+  "password": "secure",
+  "name": "John"
+}
+
+Response 200 {
+  "id": "uuid-1",
+  "email": "user@example.com",
+  "name": "John"
+}
+```
+
+**Phase 2 Tests**:
+- [ ] Test mock: `{ email: "user@example.com", password: "secure", name: "John" }`
+- [ ] Test assertion: Response has `id`, `email`, `name`
+- [ ] Test assertion: Password NOT in response
+
+**Phase 3 Backend**:
+- [ ] Handler receives: `{ email, password, name }`
+- [ ] Handler validates: Email format, password strength
+- [ ] Handler hashes: Password stored securely (not plaintext)
+- [ ] Handler returns: `{ id, email, name }` (NO password)
+- [ ] Handler stores: User record in database
+
+**Phase 4 SDK**:
+- [ ] Register method signature: `register(email, password, name)`
+- [ ] Type definition: `interface User { id, email, name }`
+- [ ] SDK returns: `User` type with id, email, name
+- [ ] SDK error handling: Maps backend errors to SDK exceptions
+
+**Phase 5 E2E Tests**:
+- [ ] Test data setup: `await userService.register("user@ex.com", "pwd", "John")`
+- [ ] Test assertion: `response.id` exists
+- [ ] Test assertion: `response.email === "user@ex.com"`
+- [ ] Test assertion: `response.password` NOT in response (undefined)
+
+✅ **Full alignment verified**: Data consistent through all phases
+
+---
+
+## 🔒 Error Code Alignment
+
+### Phase 1: Error Codes Defined
+
+```json
+{
+  "409": "Email already registered",
+  "400": "Invalid email format",
+  "422": "Password too weak"
+}
+```
+
+### Phase 3: Error Codes Implemented
+
+- [ ] Handler throws error 409 when: Email collision detected
+- [ ] Handler throws error 400 when: Email fails validation
+- [ ] Handler throws error 422 when: Password fails strength check
+- [ ] Handler includes error message in response
+- [ ] Handler doesn't leak sensitive info in error (no stack traces)
+
+### Phase 4: Error Codes Documented
+
+- [ ] SDK has enum: `UserErrors = { EMAIL_EXISTS: 409, INVALID_EMAIL: 400, WEAK_PASSWORD: 422 }`
+- [ ] SDK throws TypeScript Error with proper type
+- [ ] SDK error message matches Phase 3 message
+- [ ] SDK error handling clear in documentation
+
+### Phase 5: Error Codes Tested
+
+- [ ] E2E test: Registers with duplicate email → 409 handled correctly
+- [ ] E2E test: Registers with invalid email → 400 handled correctly
+- [ ] E2E test: Registers with weak password → 422 handled correctly
+- [ ] E2E test: Error UI shows correct message to user
+
+---
+
+## 📋 Database Schema Alignment
+
+**If database schema changed**:
+
+### Phase 1: Schema Changes Documented
+
+```json
+"User table:
+  - id: UUID (primary key)
+  - email: VARCHAR(255) UNIQUE
+  - passwordHash: VARCHAR(255)
+  - name: VARCHAR(255) NULL
+  - createdAt: TIMESTAMP DEFAULT NOW()
+"
+```
+
+### Phase 3: Schema Changes Implemented
+
+- [ ] Migration script created: `migrations/20260531_add_users_table.sql`
+- [ ] Migration creates `users` table with specified columns
+- [ ] Unique constraint on `email` field (prevents duplicates)
+- [ ] Index on `email` (for fast lookups)
+- [ ] Default timestamp on `createdAt`
+- [ ] Tests verify migration runs successfully
+
+### Phase 4: Schema Changes Known
+
+- [ ] SDK documentation notes: "User.email is unique"
+- [ ] SDK documentation notes: "User.passwordHash never exposed"
+- [ ] SDK documentation notes: "User.createdAt is timestamp"
+
+### Phase 5: Schema Changes Verified
+
+- [ ] E2E test: Two users can't have same email (409 on duplicate)
+- [ ] E2E test: User.email is returned (public field)
+- [ ] E2E test: User.passwordHash is NOT returned (private field)
+- [ ] E2E test: User.createdAt is returned (timestamp)
+
+---
+
+## 📊 Type Definition Alignment
+
+### Before (Misaligned)
+
+```
+Phase 1: { id: string, email: string, name?: string, avatar?: string }
+Phase 3: { id, email, name }  // Missing avatar
+Phase 4: { id: string; email: string; name: string; }  // Wrong: name required
+Phase 5: Test expects { id, email, name, avatar }  // Expects avatar
+```
+
+❌ **MISALIGNED**: Phases disagree on `avatar` field and `name` optionality
+
+### After (Aligned)
+
+```
+Phase 1: { id: string, email: string, name?: string }
+Phase 3: { id, email, name? }  // Matches contract
+Phase 4: { id: string; email: string; name?: string; }  // Matches contract
+Phase 5: Test expects { id, email, name? }  // Matches all phases
+```
+
+✅ **ALIGNED**: All phases agree on structure
+
+---
+
+## 🔍 Method Signature Alignment
+
+### SDK Method Signature
+
+**Phase 1 (Contract)**: 
+```
+POST /api/users/register
+Request: { email, password, name }
+Response: { id, email, name }
+```
+
+**Phase 4 (SDK)**: 
+- [ ] Method name: `register()` or `createUser()`? Pick ONE consistently
+- [ ] Method signature: `register(email: string, password: string, name?: string): Promise<User>`
+- [ ] Parameter types: string (matches contract)
+- [ ] Parameter optionality: name optional (matches contract)
+- [ ] Return type: User object (matches contract response)
+- [ ] Throws errors: Matches Phase 3 errors (409, 400, 422)
+
+**Phase 5 (E2E)**:
+- [ ] Test calls: `await userService.register("email@ex.com", "pwd", "John")`
+- [ ] Test expects: Promise returns User object
+- [ ] Test expects: User has { id, email, name }
+
+---
+
+## ⚡ Validation Order
+
+Check these in order (stop if misaligned):
+
+```
+1. Phase 1 API Contract Valid?
+   - JSON schema valid, types defined
+   
+2. Phase 1 → Phase 3 Match?
+   - Backend implements contract
+   
+3. Phase 3 → Phase 4 Match?
+   - SDK types match backend response
+   
+4. Phase 4 → Phase 5 Match?
+   - E2E tests use SDK correctly
+   
+5. Round-trip Test
+   - Phase 5 test calls all the way through to Phase 1 contract
+```
+
+If any mismatch: 🔴 STOP, document conflict, request manual review
+
+---
+
+## 🎓 Example: Breaking Change Detection
+
+### Scenario: Removing `legacyId` field
+
+**Phase 1 Contract Change**:
+```diff
+{
+  "id": "uuid",
+  "email": "user@example.com",
+- "legacyId": "legacy-format-id"
+}
+```
+
+**Alignment Check**:
+
+Phase 1 → Phase 3:
+- [ ] Phase 3 handler: Remove `legacyId` from response ✓
+- [ ] Phase 3 tests: Don't expect `legacyId` ✓
+
+Phase 3 → Phase 4:
+- [ ] Phase 4 type: Remove `legacyId` property
+  - [ ] But wait: existing code uses `user.legacyId`?
+  - [ ] Decision: Add deprecation warning or break?
+  - [ ] Need: Migration guide for Phase 4 users
+
+Phase 4 → Phase 5:
+- [ ] Phase 5 E2E: Remove test assertions on `legacyId` ✓
+
+**Alignment Result**: ⚠️ BREAKING - Requires migration guide
+
+**Migration Guide Needed**:
+```
+## Migration: Removing legacyId
+
+Before: const legacyId = user.legacyId;
+After: Use user.id instead (single ID field)
+
+Deprecation: legacyId removed in v2.1
+Timeline: 6 months from v2.0
+```
+
+---
+
+## ✅ Sign-Off
+
+When all alignments verified:
+
+- [ ] All phase-to-phase connections consistent
+- [ ] No type mismatches found
+- [ ] No missing fields in downstream phases
+- [ ] Error codes aligned across all phases
+- [ ] Database schema known to all phases
+- [ ] Method signatures compatible
+- [ ] Migration guides provided for breaking changes
+
+**ALIGNMENT VALIDATION**: ✅ PASSED
+
+Document in: `DOCS_UPDATE_LOG.md`
+
+---
+
+**Last Updated**: May 31, 2026 | **Status**: ACTIVE