codehava-agent-kit 1.0.0

package/templates/.agent/skills/nodejs-best-practices/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,333 @@
+---
+name: nodejs-best-practices
+description: Node.js development principles and decision-making. Framework selection, async patterns, security, and architecture. Teaches thinking, not copying.
+allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Grep
+---
+
+# Node.js Best Practices
+
+> Principles and decision-making for Node.js development in 2025.
+> **Learn to THINK, not memorize code patterns.**
+
+---
+
+## ⚠️ How to Use This Skill
+
+This skill teaches **decision-making principles**, not fixed code to copy.
+
+- ASK user for preferences when unclear
+- Choose framework/pattern based on CONTEXT
+- Don't default to same solution every time
+
+---
+
+## 1. Framework Selection (2025)
+
+### Decision Tree
+
+```
+What are you building?
+│
+├── Edge/Serverless (Cloudflare, Vercel)
+│   └── Hono (zero-dependency, ultra-fast cold starts)
+│
+├── High Performance API
+│   └── Fastify (2-3x faster than Express)
+│
+├── Enterprise/Team familiarity
+│   └── NestJS (structured, DI, decorators)
+│
+├── Legacy/Stable/Maximum ecosystem
+│   └── Express (mature, most middleware)
+│
+└── Full-stack with frontend
+    └── Next.js API Routes or tRPC
+```
+
+### Comparison Principles
+
+| Factor | Hono | Fastify | Express |
+|--------|------|---------|---------|
+| **Best for** | Edge, serverless | Performance | Legacy, learning |
+| **Cold start** | Fastest | Fast | Moderate |
+| **Ecosystem** | Growing | Good | Largest |
+| **TypeScript** | Native | Excellent | Good |
+| **Learning curve** | Low | Medium | Low |
+
+### Selection Questions to Ask:
+1. What's the deployment target?
+2. Is cold start time critical?
+3. Does team have existing experience?
+4. Is there legacy code to maintain?
+
+---
+
+## 2. Runtime Considerations (2025)
+
+### Native TypeScript
+
+```
+Node.js 22+: --experimental-strip-types
+├── Run .ts files directly
+├── No build step needed for simple projects
+└── Consider for: scripts, simple APIs
+```
+
+### Module System Decision
+
+```
+ESM (import/export)
+├── Modern standard
+├── Better tree-shaking
+├── Async module loading
+└── Use for: new projects
+
+CommonJS (require)
+├── Legacy compatibility
+├── More npm packages support
+└── Use for: existing codebases, some edge cases
+```
+
+### Runtime Selection
+
+| Runtime | Best For |
+|---------|----------|
+| **Node.js** | General purpose, largest ecosystem |
+| **Bun** | Performance, built-in bundler |
+| **Deno** | Security-first, built-in TypeScript |
+
+---
+
+## 3. Architecture Principles
+
+### Layered Structure Concept
+
+```
+Request Flow:
+│
+├── Controller/Route Layer
+│   ├── Handles HTTP specifics
+│   ├── Input validation at boundary
+│   └── Calls service layer
+│
+├── Service Layer
+│   ├── Business logic
+│   ├── Framework-agnostic
+│   └── Calls repository layer
+│
+└── Repository Layer
+    ├── Data access only
+    ├── Database queries
+    └── ORM interactions
+```
+
+### Why This Matters:
+- **Testability**: Mock layers independently
+- **Flexibility**: Swap database without touching business logic
+- **Clarity**: Each layer has single responsibility
+
+### When to Simplify:
+- Small scripts → Single file OK
+- Prototypes → Less structure acceptable
+- Always ask: "Will this grow?"
+
+---
+
+## 4. Error Handling Principles
+
+### Centralized Error Handling
+
+```
+Pattern:
+├── Create custom error classes
+├── Throw from any layer
+├── Catch at top level (middleware)
+└── Format consistent response
+```
+
+### Error Response Philosophy
+
+```
+Client gets:
+├── Appropriate HTTP status
+├── Error code for programmatic handling
+├── User-friendly message
+└── NO internal details (security!)
+
+Logs get:
+├── Full stack trace
+├── Request context
+├── User ID (if applicable)
+└── Timestamp
+```
+
+### Status Code Selection
+
+| Situation | Status | When |
+|-----------|--------|------|
+| Bad input | 400 | Client sent invalid data |
+| No auth | 401 | Missing or invalid credentials |
+| No permission | 403 | Valid auth, but not allowed |
+| Not found | 404 | Resource doesn't exist |
+| Conflict | 409 | Duplicate or state conflict |
+| Validation | 422 | Schema valid but business rules fail |
+| Server error | 500 | Our fault, log everything |
+
+---
+
+## 5. Async Patterns Principles
+
+### When to Use Each
+
+| Pattern | Use When |
+|---------|----------|
+| `async/await` | Sequential async operations |
+| `Promise.all` | Parallel independent operations |
+| `Promise.allSettled` | Parallel where some can fail |
+| `Promise.race` | Timeout or first response wins |
+
+### Event Loop Awareness
+
+```
+I/O-bound (async helps):
+├── Database queries
+├── HTTP requests
+├── File system
+└── Network operations
+
+CPU-bound (async doesn't help):
+├── Crypto operations
+├── Image processing
+├── Complex calculations
+└── → Use worker threads or offload
+```
+
+### Avoiding Event Loop Blocking
+
+- Never use sync methods in production (fs.readFileSync, etc.)
+- Offload CPU-intensive work
+- Use streaming for large data
+
+---
+
+## 6. Validation Principles
+
+### Validate at Boundaries
+
+```
+Where to validate:
+├── API entry point (request body/params)
+├── Before database operations
+├── External data (API responses, file uploads)
+└── Environment variables (startup)
+```
+
+### Validation Library Selection
+
+| Library | Best For |
+|---------|----------|
+| **Zod** | TypeScript first, inference |
+| **Valibot** | Smaller bundle (tree-shakeable) |
+| **ArkType** | Performance critical |
+| **Yup** | Existing React Form usage |
+
+### Validation Philosophy
+
+- Fail fast: Validate early
+- Be specific: Clear error messages
+- Don't trust: Even "internal" data
+
+---
+
+## 7. Security Principles
+
+### Security Checklist (Not Code)
+
+- [ ] **Input validation**: All inputs validated
+- [ ] **Parameterized queries**: No string concatenation for SQL
+- [ ] **Password hashing**: bcrypt or argon2
+- [ ] **JWT verification**: Always verify signature and expiry
+- [ ] **Rate limiting**: Protect from abuse
+- [ ] **Security headers**: Helmet.js or equivalent
+- [ ] **HTTPS**: Everywhere in production
+- [ ] **CORS**: Properly configured
+- [ ] **Secrets**: Environment variables only
+- [ ] **Dependencies**: Regularly audited
+
+### Security Mindset
+
+```
+Trust nothing:
+├── Query params → validate
+├── Request body → validate
+├── Headers → verify
+├── Cookies → validate
+├── File uploads → scan
+└── External APIs → validate response
+```
+
+---
+
+## 8. Testing Principles
+
+### Test Strategy Selection
+
+| Type | Purpose | Tools |
+|------|---------|-------|
+| **Unit** | Business logic | node:test, Vitest |
+| **Integration** | API endpoints | Supertest |
+| **E2E** | Full flows | Playwright |
+
+### What to Test (Priorities)
+
+1. **Critical paths**: Auth, payments, core business
+2. **Edge cases**: Empty inputs, boundaries
+3. **Error handling**: What happens when things fail?
+4. **Not worth testing**: Framework code, trivial getters
+
+### Built-in Test Runner (Node.js 22+)
+
+```
+node --test src/**/*.test.ts
+├── No external dependency
+├── Good coverage reporting
+└── Watch mode available
+```
+
+---
+
+## 10. Anti-Patterns to Avoid
+
+### ❌ DON'T:
+- Use Express for new edge projects (use Hono)
+- Use sync methods in production code
+- Put business logic in controllers
+- Skip input validation
+- Hardcode secrets
+- Trust external data without validation
+- Block event loop with CPU work
+
+### ✅ DO:
+- Choose framework based on context
+- Ask user for preferences when unclear
+- Use layered architecture for growing projects
+- Validate all inputs
+- Use environment variables for secrets
+- Profile before optimizing
+
+---
+
+## 11. Decision Checklist
+
+Before implementing:
+
+- [ ] **Asked user about stack preference?**
+- [ ] **Chosen framework for THIS context?** (not just default)
+- [ ] **Considered deployment target?**
+- [ ] **Planned error handling strategy?**
+- [ ] **Identified validation points?**
+- [ ] **Considered security requirements?**
+
+---
+
+> **Remember**: Node.js best practices are about decision-making, not memorizing patterns. Every project deserves fresh consideration based on its requirements.

package/templates/.agent/skills/parallel-agents/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
+---
+name: parallel-agents
+description: Multi-agent orchestration patterns. Use when multiple independent tasks can run with different domain expertise or when comprehensive analysis requires multiple perspectives.
+allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep
+---
+
+# Native Parallel Agents
+
+> Orchestration through Antigravity's built-in Agent Tool
+
+## Overview
+
+This skill enables coordinating multiple specialized agents through Antigravity's native agent system. Unlike external scripts, this approach keeps all orchestration within Antigravity's control.
+
+## When to Use Orchestration
+
+✅ **Good for:**
+- Complex tasks requiring multiple expertise domains
+- Code analysis from security, performance, and quality perspectives
+- Comprehensive reviews (architecture + security + testing)
+- Feature implementation needing backend + frontend + database work
+
+❌ **Not for:**
+- Simple, single-domain tasks
+- Quick fixes or small changes
+- Tasks where one agent suffices
+
+---
+
+## Native Agent Invocation
+
+### Single Agent
+```
+Use the security-auditor agent to review authentication
+```
+
+### Sequential Chain
+```
+First, use the explorer-agent to discover project structure.
+Then, use the backend-specialist to review API endpoints.
+Finally, use the test-engineer to identify test gaps.
+```
+
+### With Context Passing
+```
+Use the frontend-specialist to analyze React components.
+Based on those findings, have the test-engineer generate component tests.
+```
+
+### Resume Previous Work
+```
+Resume agent [agentId] and continue with additional requirements.
+```
+
+---
+
+## Orchestration Patterns
+
+### Pattern 1: Comprehensive Analysis
+```
+Agents: explorer-agent → [domain-agents] → synthesis
+
+1. explorer-agent: Map codebase structure
+2. security-auditor: Security posture
+3. backend-specialist: API quality
+4. frontend-specialist: UI/UX patterns
+5. test-engineer: Test coverage
+6. Synthesize all findings
+```
+
+### Pattern 2: Feature Review
+```
+Agents: affected-domain-agents → test-engineer
+
+1. Identify affected domains (backend? frontend? both?)
+2. Invoke relevant domain agents
+3. test-engineer verifies changes
+4. Synthesize recommendations
+```
+
+### Pattern 3: Security Audit
+```
+Agents: security-auditor → penetration-tester → synthesis
+
+1. security-auditor: Configuration and code review
+2. penetration-tester: Active vulnerability testing
+3. Synthesize with prioritized remediation
+```
+
+---
+
+## Available Agents
+
+| Agent | Expertise | Trigger Phrases |
+|-------|-----------|-----------------|
+| `orchestrator` | Coordination | "comprehensive", "multi-perspective" |
+| `security-auditor` | Security | "security", "auth", "vulnerabilities" |
+| `penetration-tester` | Security Testing | "pentest", "red team", "exploit" |
+| `backend-specialist` | Backend | "API", "server", "Node.js", "Express" |
+| `frontend-specialist` | Frontend | "React", "UI", "components", "Next.js" |
+| `test-engineer` | Testing | "tests", "coverage", "TDD" |
+| `devops-engineer` | DevOps | "deploy", "CI/CD", "infrastructure" |
+| `database-architect` | Database | "schema", "Prisma", "migrations" |
+| `mobile-developer` | Mobile | "React Native", "Flutter", "mobile" |
+| `api-designer` | API Design | "REST", "GraphQL", "OpenAPI" |
+| `debugger` | Debugging | "bug", "error", "not working" |
+| `explorer-agent` | Discovery | "explore", "map", "structure" |
+| `documentation-writer` | Documentation | "write docs", "create README", "generate API docs" |
+| `performance-optimizer` | Performance | "slow", "optimize", "profiling" |
+| `project-planner` | Planning | "plan", "roadmap", "milestones" |
+| `seo-specialist` | SEO | "SEO", "meta tags", "search ranking" |
+| `game-developer` | Game Development | "game", "Unity", "Godot", "Phaser" |
+
+---
+
+## Antigravity Built-in Agents
+
+These work alongside custom agents:
+
+| Agent | Model | Purpose |
+|-------|-------|---------|
+| **Explore** | Haiku | Fast read-only codebase search |
+| **Plan** | Sonnet | Research during plan mode |
+| **General-purpose** | Sonnet | Complex multi-step modifications |
+
+Use **Explore** for quick searches, **custom agents** for domain expertise.
+
+---
+
+## Synthesis Protocol
+
+After all agents complete, synthesize:
+
+```markdown
+## Orchestration Synthesis
+
+### Task Summary
+[What was accomplished]
+
+### Agent Contributions
+| Agent | Finding |
+|-------|---------|
+| security-auditor | Found X |
+| backend-specialist | Identified Y |
+
+### Consolidated Recommendations
+1. **Critical**: [Issue from Agent A]
+2. **Important**: [Issue from Agent B]
+3. **Nice-to-have**: [Enhancement from Agent C]
+
+### Action Items
+- [ ] Fix critical security issue
+- [ ] Refactor API endpoint
+- [ ] Add missing tests
+```
+
+---
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1. **Available agents** - 17 specialized agents can be orchestrated
+2. **Logical order** - Discovery → Analysis → Implementation → Testing
+3. **Share context** - Pass relevant findings to subsequent agents
+4. **Single synthesis** - One unified report, not separate outputs
+5. **Verify changes** - Always include test-engineer for code modifications
+
+---
+
+## Key Benefits
+
+- ✅ **Single session** - All agents share context
+- ✅ **AI-controlled** - Claude orchestrates autonomously
+- ✅ **Native integration** - Works with built-in Explore, Plan agents
+- ✅ **Resume support** - Can continue previous agent work
+- ✅ **Context passing** - Findings flow between agents

package/templates/.agent/skills/performance-profiling/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+---
+name: performance-profiling
+description: Performance profiling principles. Measurement, analysis, and optimization techniques.
+allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, Bash
+---
+
+# Performance Profiling
+
+> Measure, analyze, optimize - in that order.
+
+## 🔧 Runtime Scripts
+
+**Execute these for automated profiling:**
+
+| Script | Purpose | Usage |
+|--------|---------|-------|
+| `scripts/lighthouse_audit.py` | Lighthouse performance audit | `python scripts/lighthouse_audit.py https://example.com` |
+
+---
+
+## 1. Core Web Vitals
+
+### Targets
+
+| Metric | Good | Poor | Measures |
+|--------|------|------|----------|
+| **LCP** | < 2.5s | > 4.0s | Loading |
+| **INP** | < 200ms | > 500ms | Interactivity |
+| **CLS** | < 0.1 | > 0.25 | Stability |
+
+### When to Measure
+
+| Stage | Tool |
+|-------|------|
+| Development | Local Lighthouse |
+| CI/CD | Lighthouse CI |
+| Production | RUM (Real User Monitoring) |
+
+---
+
+## 2. Profiling Workflow
+
+### The 4-Step Process
+
+```
+1. BASELINE → Measure current state
+2. IDENTIFY → Find the bottleneck
+3. FIX → Make targeted change
+4. VALIDATE → Confirm improvement
+```
+
+### Profiling Tool Selection
+
+| Problem | Tool |
+|---------|------|
+| Page load | Lighthouse |
+| Bundle size | Bundle analyzer |
+| Runtime | DevTools Performance |
+| Memory | DevTools Memory |
+| Network | DevTools Network |
+
+---
+
+## 3. Bundle Analysis
+
+### What to Look For
+
+| Issue | Indicator |
+|-------|-----------|
+| Large dependencies | Top of bundle |
+| Duplicate code | Multiple chunks |
+| Unused code | Low coverage |
+| Missing splits | Single large chunk |
+
+### Optimization Actions
+
+| Finding | Action |
+|---------|--------|
+| Big library | Import specific modules |
+| Duplicate deps | Dedupe, update versions |
+| Route in main | Code split |
+| Unused exports | Tree shake |
+
+---
+
+## 4. Runtime Profiling
+
+### Performance Tab Analysis
+
+| Pattern | Meaning |
+|---------|---------|
+| Long tasks (>50ms) | UI blocking |
+| Many small tasks | Possible batching opportunity |
+| Layout/paint | Rendering bottleneck |
+| Script | JavaScript execution |
+
+### Memory Tab Analysis
+
+| Pattern | Meaning |
+|---------|---------|
+| Growing heap | Possible leak |
+| Large retained | Check references |
+| Detached DOM | Not cleaned up |
+
+---
+
+## 5. Common Bottlenecks
+
+### By Symptom
+
+| Symptom | Likely Cause |
+|---------|--------------|
+| Slow initial load | Large JS, render blocking |
+| Slow interactions | Heavy event handlers |
+| Jank during scroll | Layout thrashing |
+| Growing memory | Leaks, retained refs |
+
+---
+
+## 6. Quick Win Priorities
+
+| Priority | Action | Impact |
+|----------|--------|--------|
+| 1 | Enable compression | High |
+| 2 | Lazy load images | High |
+| 3 | Code split routes | High |
+| 4 | Cache static assets | Medium |
+| 5 | Optimize images | Medium |
+
+---
+
+## 7. Anti-Patterns
+
+| ❌ Don't | ✅ Do |
+|----------|-------|
+| Guess at problems | Profile first |
+| Micro-optimize | Fix biggest issue |
+| Optimize early | Optimize when needed |
+| Ignore real users | Use RUM data |
+
+---
+
+> **Remember:** The fastest code is code that doesn't run. Remove before optimizing.