code-framework 1.0.0 → 1.1.0

package/README.md

@@ -4,38 +4,58 @@
 
 > "All ideas deserve a story."
 
-CODE is an AI-assisted development framework that helps anyone - coders and non-coders alike - ship their ideas. It takes you from a simple idea to a living, evolving product through structured workflows and personality-driven AI agents.
+CODE is an AI-assisted development framework that helps anyone - coders and non-coders alike - ship their ideas. It takes you from a simple idea to a living, evolving product through structured workflows, quality gates, and personality-driven AI agents.
 
 ## Quick Start
 
 ```bash
 # Install CODE to your project
-npx code-framework install
+npx code-framework
 
-# Or copy the _code folder manually
-cp -r _code your-project/
+# Follow the interactive prompts to:
+# 1. Select your AI CLI tools (Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, etc.)
+# 2. Install framework files
+# 3. Configure your chosen tools
 ```
 
+## Supported AI CLI Tools
+
+CODE Framework integrates with multiple AI coding assistants:
+
+| Tool | Status | Config File |
+|------|--------|-------------|
+| **Claude Code** ⭐ | Recommended | `.claude/commands.yaml`, `CLAUDE.md` |
+| **Cursor** ⭐ | Recommended | `.cursorrules` |
+| **Windsurf** | Supported | `.windsurfrules` |
+| **Antigravity** | Supported | `.antigravity/commands.yaml` |
+| **OpenCode** | Supported | `.opencode/commands.yaml` |
+| **Aider** | Supported | `CONVENTIONS.md` |
+| **Cline** | Supported | `.clinerules` |
+
 ## The CODE Process
 
 ```
 1. CONTEXT    Fill out your BRIEF (5 simple docs)
-     ↓
+     ↓        └─ Quality Gate: /code-checklist-brief
 2. OUTLINE    AI generates technical architecture
-     ↓
+     ↓        └─ Quality Gate: /code-checklist-architecture
 3. DOCUMENTATION    AI creates Epics & Stories
-     ↓
-4. EVOLVE     Add features, repeat the cycle
+     ↓        └─ Quality Gate: /code-checklist-story
+4. IMPLEMENT  Build story by story
+     ↓        └─ Quality Gate: /code-checklist-code
+5. EVOLVE     Add features, repeat the cycle
+             └─ Quality Gate: /code-checklist-release
 ```
 
 ## Your Project Structure After Install
 
 ```
 your-project/
-├── _code/                      # Framework (don't edit)
+├── _code/                      # Framework (read-only)
 │   ├── agents/                 # AI agent personalities
 │   ├── workflows/              # Guided processes
-│   └── templates/              # Output templates
+│   ├── templates/              # Output templates
+│   └── checklists/             # Quality gates
 │
 ├── 1-context/                  # YOUR CONTEXT (start here!)
 │   ├── v1.0.0/                 # Version 1 of your idea
@@ -59,11 +79,7 @@ your-project/
 │
 ├── 4-documentation/            # Living Plan
 │   ├── epics/                  # Epic files (growing list)
-│   │   ├── epic-001-*.md
-│   │   └── epic-002-*.md
 │   └── stories/                # Story files by epic
-│       ├── epic-001/
-│       └── epic-002/
 │
 ├── 5-evolution/                # Change tracking
 │   └── changelog.md            # What changed and when
@@ -75,35 +91,85 @@ your-project/
 
 | Agent | Role | When to Call |
 |-------|------|--------------|
-| **SAGE** | Guide & Orchestrator | Start here, coordinates everything |
-| **IRIS** | Context Architect | Helps fill out BRIEF |
-| **ATLAS** | Technical Architect | Generates Outline |
-| **LUNA** | Experience Designer | Creates UX & Wireframes |
-| **ECHO** | Story Keeper | Writes Epics & Stories |
-| **PHOENIX** | Evolution Strategist | Manages feature additions |
-| **BUILDER** | Developer | Implements stories |
-| **SCOUT** | Quality Guide | Reviews & tests |
+| **SAGE** 🧙 | Guide & Orchestrator | Start here, coordinates everything |
+| **IRIS** 🎯 | Context Architect | Helps fill out BRIEF |
+| **ATLAS** 🏗️ | Technical Architect | Generates Outline |
+| **LUNA** 🎨 | Experience Designer | Creates UX & Wireframes |
+| **ECHO** 📖 | Story Keeper | Writes Epics & Stories |
+| **PHOENIX** 🚀 | Evolution Strategist | Manages feature additions |
+| **BUILDER** 💻 | Developer | Implements stories |
+| **SCOUT** 🧪 | Quality Guide | Reviews & tests |
 
 ## Commands
 
+All commands use the `/code-` prefix to avoid conflicts with other tools.
+
+### Main Commands
+
+| Command | Description |
+|---------|-------------|
+| `/code-help` | Show help and available commands |
+| `/code-status` | Check project status and next steps |
+| `/code-sage` | Start here - SAGE guides you through everything |
+| `/code-brief` | Fill out or improve your BRIEF |
+| `/code-outline` | Generate technical architecture from BRIEF |
+| `/code-ux` | Generate sitemap and wireframe prompts |
+| `/code-docs` | Generate epics and stories |
+| `/code-implement` | Start coding a story |
+| `/code-review` | Review and QA any work |
+| `/code-evolve` | Add a new feature (creates new version) |
+| `/code-party` | Bring all agents together for discussion |
+
+### Quality Gate Commands
+
 | Command | Description |
 |---------|-------------|
-| `/sage` | Start here - SAGE guides you through everything |
-| `/brief` | Fill out or improve your BRIEF |
-| `/outline` | Generate technical architecture from BRIEF |
-| `/ux` | Generate sitemap and wireframe prompts |
-| `/docs` | Generate epics and stories |
-| `/evolve` | Add a new feature (creates new version) |
-| `/implement` | Start coding a story |
-| `/party` | Bring all agents together for discussion |
+| `/code-checklist` | Run a specific quality checklist |
+| `/code-checklist-brief` | Validate BRIEF completeness |
+| `/code-checklist-architecture` | Review technical architecture |
+| `/code-checklist-story` | Validate story before implementation |
+| `/code-checklist-code` | Code review checklist |
+| `/code-checklist-release` | Pre-release verification |
+
+### Utility Commands
+
+| Command | Description |
+|---------|-------------|
+| `/code-research` | Research a topic and save findings |
+| `/code-sprint` | Plan a sprint from available stories |
+
+## Quality Gates
+
+Each workflow has a corresponding quality checklist:
+
+| Checklist | When to Use | Location |
+|-----------|-------------|----------|
+| Brief Checklist | After BRIEF, before Outline | `_code/checklists/brief-checklist.md` |
+| Architecture Checklist | After Outline, before Docs | `_code/checklists/architecture-checklist.md` |
+| Story Checklist | Before implementing a story | `_code/checklists/story-checklist.md` |
+| Code Review Checklist | Before merging code | `_code/checklists/code-review-checklist.md` |
+| Pre-Release Checklist | Before production deployment | `_code/checklists/pre-release-checklist.md` |
 
 ## Philosophy
 
 1. **All ideas deserve a story** - Every feature, every thought gets documented
 2. **AI-assisted, human-controlled** - AI suggests, you decide
-3. **Living documentation** - Your plan grows with your project
-4. **Context isolation** - New features don't pollute old context
-5. **Ship, don't dream** - Everything exists to help you launch
+3. **Quality gates matter** - Checklists prevent disasters before they happen
+4. **Living documentation** - Your plan grows with your project
+5. **Context isolation** - New features don't pollute old context
+6. **Ship, don't dream** - Everything exists to help you launch
+
+## Comparison with BMAD
+
+CODE Framework is a streamlined alternative to the [BMAD Method](https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD):
+
+| Aspect | BMAD | CODE |
+|--------|------|------|
+| Setup | CLI wizard with many options | Simple `npx` with tool selection |
+| Structure | Role-based (personas, agents, tasks) | Version-based (v1.0.0 folders) |
+| Commands | `/bmad-*` prefix | `/code-*` prefix |
+| Quality Gates | Comprehensive checklists | 5 essential checklists |
+| Best For | Enterprises, large teams | Solo devs, small teams, MVPs |
 
 ## License
 

package/_code/checklists/architecture-checklist.md

@@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
+# Architecture Quality Checklist
+
+**Purpose:** Validate technical architecture before generating epics and stories.
+
+**When to run:** After completing the outline, before running `/code-docs`.
+
+---
+
+## 1. Technical Outline Completeness
+
+### System Overview
+- [ ] **High-level architecture** - Is there a clear system diagram/description?
+- [ ] **Component breakdown** - Are major components identified?
+- [ ] **Component responsibilities** - Is each component's purpose clear?
+- [ ] **Data flow** - Is it clear how data moves through the system?
+
+### Technology Decisions
+- [ ] **All technologies named** - No "TBD" or "to be decided"?
+- [ ] **Versions specified** - Are technology versions included?
+- [ ] **Decision rationale** - Is the "why" documented for key choices?
+
+---
+
+## 2. Data Schema Quality
+
+### Entity Definitions
+- [ ] **All entities defined** - Do entities match the BRIEF's entities section?
+- [ ] **Primary keys** - Does every entity have a unique identifier?
+- [ ] **Required fields** - Are required vs optional fields marked?
+- [ ] **Field types** - Are data types specified (string, number, date, etc.)?
+
+### Relationships
+- [ ] **All relationships mapped** - Are relationships between entities defined?
+- [ ] **Cardinality clear** - 1:1, 1:many, many:many specified?
+- [ ] **Foreign keys** - Are relationship fields identified?
+- [ ] **Cascade behavior** - What happens when parent records are deleted?
+
+### Data Integrity
+- [ ] **Unique constraints** - What fields must be unique?
+- [ ] **Validation rules** - Are data validation rules specified?
+- [ ] **Default values** - Are sensible defaults defined?
+- [ ] **Soft delete** - Is deletion strategy defined?
+
+---
+
+## 3. API Design Quality
+
+### Endpoint Coverage
+- [ ] **All features covered** - Is there an API endpoint for each P0 requirement?
+- [ ] **CRUD operations** - Can users create, read, update, delete core entities?
+- [ ] **RESTful design** - Do endpoints follow REST conventions?
+- [ ] **Consistent naming** - Are endpoints named consistently?
+
+### Request/Response
+- [ ] **Request schemas** - Are request body formats defined?
+- [ ] **Response schemas** - Are response formats defined?
+- [ ] **Error responses** - Are error formats standardized?
+- [ ] **Status codes** - Are appropriate HTTP status codes used?
+
+### Security
+- [ ] **Authentication** - Which endpoints require authentication?
+- [ ] **Authorization** - Which endpoints require specific permissions?
+- [ ] **Rate limiting** - Are rate limits defined for sensitive endpoints?
+- [ ] **Input validation** - Is validation specified for inputs?
+
+---
+
+## 4. Tech Stack Appropriateness
+
+### Frontend
+- [ ] **Framework choice justified** - Does the framework match requirements?
+- [ ] **State management** - Is state management approach defined?
+- [ ] **Styling approach** - Is CSS/styling strategy clear?
+- [ ] **Build tooling** - Is the build process defined?
+
+### Backend
+- [ ] **Framework choice justified** - Does it match team skills/requirements?
+- [ ] **Database choice justified** - SQL vs NoSQL decision explained?
+- [ ] **ORM/query approach** - How will data access work?
+- [ ] **Background jobs** - If needed, how will async work be handled?
+
+### Infrastructure
+- [ ] **Hosting defined** - Where will this be deployed?
+- [ ] **Environment strategy** - Dev/staging/production plan?
+- [ ] **CI/CD approach** - How will deployments work?
+- [ ] **Monitoring/logging** - How will you know when things break?
+
+---
+
+## 5. Security Review
+
+### Authentication
+- [ ] **Auth method defined** - Email/password, OAuth, SSO?
+- [ ] **Session management** - How are sessions handled?
+- [ ] **Password requirements** - Are password policies defined?
+- [ ] **Account recovery** - How do users reset passwords?
+
+### Authorization
+- [ ] **Permission model** - RBAC, ABAC, or custom?
+- [ ] **Role definitions** - What can each role do?
+- [ ] **Resource ownership** - Can users only access their own data?
+- [ ] **Admin capabilities** - What can admins override?
+
+### Data Protection
+- [ ] **Sensitive data identified** - What data needs extra protection?
+- [ ] **Encryption at rest** - Is database encryption planned?
+- [ ] **Encryption in transit** - HTTPS everywhere?
+- [ ] **PII handling** - How is personal data managed?
+
+---
+
+## 6. Scalability Considerations
+
+### Performance
+- [ ] **Expected load** - What's the expected user count?
+- [ ] **Bottlenecks identified** - What might become slow?
+- [ ] **Caching strategy** - Where will caching help?
+- [ ] **Database indexing** - Are indexes planned for common queries?
+
+### Growth Path
+- [ ] **Horizontal scaling** - Can more instances be added?
+- [ ] **Database scaling** - Read replicas? Sharding?
+- [ ] **CDN usage** - For static assets?
+- [ ] **Cost projections** - Any cost estimates at scale?
+
+---
+
+## Overall Assessment
+
+### Completeness Score
+Count the checked items above: ____ / 55
+
+### Scoring Guide
+- **48-55**: Excellent - Ready for `/code-docs`
+- **40-47**: Good - Minor gaps, can proceed with notes
+- **30-39**: Fair - Should address gaps before proceeding
+- **Below 30**: Incomplete - Significant rework needed
+
+### Security Concerns
+List any security issues that must be addressed:
+1.
+2.
+3.
+
+### Scalability Concerns
+List any scalability issues to monitor:
+1.
+2.
+3.
+
+### Technical Debt Risks
+List areas that may accumulate tech debt:
+1.
+2.
+3.
+
+---
+
+## Verdict
+
+**Ready to proceed to `/code-docs`?**
+
+- [ ] **YES** - Architecture is solid and complete
+- [ ] **YES, WITH NOTES** - Minor gaps documented, can proceed
+- [ ] **NO** - Critical gaps must be addressed first
+
+**Reviewer notes:**
+

package/_code/checklists/brief-checklist.md

@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+# BRIEF Quality Checklist
+
+**Purpose:** Validate that the BRIEF is complete and ready for technical architecture.
+
+**When to run:** After completing all 5 BRIEF sections, before running `/code-outline`.
+
+---
+
+## 1. Brainstorm Completeness
+
+### Core Idea
+- [ ] **One-sentence description** - Is there a clear, concise one-sentence description of the product?
+- [ ] **Problem statement** - Is the problem being solved clearly articulated?
+- [ ] **Target audience** - Are the target users identified and described?
+- [ ] **Vision for success** - Is there a clear picture of what success looks like?
+- [ ] **Unique value proposition** - What makes this different from alternatives?
+
+### Depth Check
+- [ ] Is the problem significant enough to warrant building a solution?
+- [ ] Is the target audience specific (not "everyone")?
+- [ ] Would the success vision be measurable?
+
+---
+
+## 2. Requirements Completeness
+
+### Priority Levels
+- [ ] **P0 (Must Have)** - Are essential features clearly identified?
+- [ ] **P1 (Should Have)** - Are important but non-critical features listed?
+- [ ] **P2 (Could Have)** - Are nice-to-have features separated?
+- [ ] **Constraints** - Are technical/business constraints documented?
+- [ ] **Success metrics** - Are measurable goals defined?
+
+### Quality Checks
+- [ ] Are P0 requirements truly essential (MVP would fail without them)?
+- [ ] Are requirements specific and testable (not vague)?
+- [ ] Are there too many P0 requirements (scope creep)?
+- [ ] Do constraints include timeline, budget, or regulatory requirements?
+
+---
+
+## 3. Inspiration Quality
+
+### Reference Products
+- [ ] **Products listed** - Are 2-5 reference products/apps identified?
+- [ ] **Specific aspects** - Is it clear WHAT about each product is inspiring?
+- [ ] **Screenshots/links** - Are visual references provided (in moodboard)?
+- [ ] **Anti-patterns** - Are things to AVOID documented?
+
+### Depth Check
+- [ ] Are the inspirations relevant to the problem being solved?
+- [ ] Is it clear which UX patterns to borrow?
+- [ ] Are design aesthetic preferences captured?
+
+---
+
+## 4. Entities Definition
+
+### User Types
+- [ ] **User types defined** - Are all user types/roles identified?
+- [ ] **Permissions mapped** - Is it clear what each user type can do?
+- [ ] **User journeys** - Are key user journeys outlined?
+
+### Data Model
+- [ ] **Core entities** - Are main data types identified (User, Project, etc.)?
+- [ ] **Relationships** - Are relationships between entities defined?
+- [ ] **Key attributes** - Are important fields/properties listed?
+- [ ] **Data ownership** - Is it clear who owns/can modify what data?
+
+### Quality Checks
+- [ ] Does the data model support all P0 requirements?
+- [ ] Are there any obvious missing entities?
+- [ ] Are user permissions realistic and implementable?
+
+---
+
+## 5. Framework Preferences
+
+### Platform
+- [ ] **Target platforms** - Web, mobile, desktop, API?
+- [ ] **Browser support** - Any specific requirements?
+- [ ] **Device support** - Mobile-first? Desktop-first?
+
+### Technology
+- [ ] **Tech preferences** - Any required or preferred technologies?
+- [ ] **Integration needs** - Third-party services, APIs, or systems?
+- [ ] **Existing systems** - Anything to integrate with?
+
+### Non-Functional Requirements
+- [ ] **Performance** - Any speed/load requirements?
+- [ ] **Security** - Authentication needs, data sensitivity?
+- [ ] **Scalability** - Expected user load?
+- [ ] **Accessibility** - WCAG compliance needs?
+- [ ] **Localization** - Multi-language support?
+
+---
+
+## Overall Assessment
+
+### Completeness Score
+Count the checked items above: ____ / 35
+
+### Scoring Guide
+- **30-35**: Excellent - Ready for `/code-outline`
+- **25-29**: Good - Minor gaps, can proceed with notes
+- **20-24**: Fair - Should address gaps before proceeding
+- **Below 20**: Incomplete - Need more information
+
+### Blockers (Must Fix)
+List any critical gaps that would block architecture work:
+1.
+2.
+3.
+
+### Recommendations
+List suggested improvements (not blocking):
+1.
+2.
+3.
+
+---
+
+## Verdict
+
+**Ready to proceed to `/code-outline`?**
+
+- [ ] **YES** - BRIEF is complete and comprehensive
+- [ ] **YES, WITH NOTES** - Minor gaps documented, can proceed
+- [ ] **NO** - Critical gaps must be addressed first
+
+**Reviewer notes:**
+

package/_code/checklists/code-review-checklist.md

@@ -0,0 +1,211 @@
+# Code Review Checklist
+
+**Purpose:** Ensure code quality before merging implementation.
+
+**When to run:** After completing story implementation, before merging.
+
+---
+
+## 1. Functionality
+
+### Acceptance Criteria
+- [ ] **All AC met** - Does the code satisfy every acceptance criterion?
+- [ ] **Happy path works** - Does the main flow work correctly?
+- [ ] **Edge cases handled** - Are boundary conditions handled?
+- [ ] **Error handling** - Are errors caught and handled gracefully?
+
+### User Experience
+- [ ] **Loading states** - Are loading indicators shown during async ops?
+- [ ] **Empty states** - Are empty states handled properly?
+- [ ] **Error messages** - Are error messages helpful and user-friendly?
+- [ ] **Success feedback** - Does the user know when actions succeed?
+
+---
+
+## 2. Code Quality
+
+### Readability
+- [ ] **Clear naming** - Are variables, functions, and classes well-named?
+- [ ] **Comments where needed** - Is complex logic explained?
+- [ ] **No commented-out code** - Is dead code removed?
+- [ ] **Consistent formatting** - Does code follow project style guide?
+
+### Structure
+- [ ] **Single responsibility** - Do functions/classes do one thing well?
+- [ ] **DRY principle** - Is code duplication minimized?
+- [ ] **Appropriate abstraction** - Is complexity properly encapsulated?
+- [ ] **File organization** - Are files in the right locations?
+
+### Best Practices
+- [ ] **No hardcoded values** - Are magic numbers/strings extracted?
+- [ ] **Proper error types** - Are custom errors used appropriately?
+- [ ] **Async handling** - Are promises/async-await used correctly?
+- [ ] **Resource cleanup** - Are resources (connections, subscriptions) cleaned up?
+
+---
+
+## 3. Security
+
+### Input Validation
+- [ ] **User input validated** - Is all user input validated?
+- [ ] **SQL injection prevented** - Are queries parameterized?
+- [ ] **XSS prevented** - Is output properly escaped?
+- [ ] **CSRF protected** - Are forms protected against CSRF?
+
+### Authentication & Authorization
+- [ ] **Auth checks present** - Are protected routes/actions secured?
+- [ ] **Permissions verified** - Is authorization checked before actions?
+- [ ] **Sensitive data protected** - Are secrets not exposed in code?
+- [ ] **No credential logging** - Are credentials not logged?
+
+### Data Protection
+- [ ] **PII handled properly** - Is personal data protected?
+- [ ] **Secure communication** - Is HTTPS used for external calls?
+- [ ] **Sensitive headers** - Are security headers set properly?
+
+---
+
+## 4. Performance
+
+### Efficiency
+- [ ] **No unnecessary loops** - Are loops efficient?
+- [ ] **Database queries optimized** - Are N+1 queries avoided?
+- [ ] **Pagination used** - Are large lists paginated?
+- [ ] **Caching considered** - Is caching used where beneficial?
+
+### Frontend Performance
+- [ ] **No unnecessary re-renders** - Is React rendering optimized?
+- [ ] **Images optimized** - Are images properly sized/compressed?
+- [ ] **Lazy loading** - Are large components/routes lazy loaded?
+- [ ] **Bundle size** - Does the change avoid bloating the bundle?
+
+### Resource Management
+- [ ] **Memory leaks** - Are event listeners/subscriptions cleaned up?
+- [ ] **Connection pooling** - Are database connections managed properly?
+- [ ] **Timeout handling** - Do network requests have timeouts?
+
+---
+
+## 5. Testing
+
+### Test Coverage
+- [ ] **Unit tests written** - Are new functions tested?
+- [ ] **Integration tests** - Are component interactions tested?
+- [ ] **Edge cases tested** - Are boundary conditions covered?
+- [ ] **Error cases tested** - Are error scenarios tested?
+
+### Test Quality
+- [ ] **Tests are meaningful** - Do tests actually verify behavior?
+- [ ] **Tests are independent** - Can tests run in any order?
+- [ ] **Tests are readable** - Are test names descriptive?
+- [ ] **No flaky tests** - Are tests reliable and repeatable?
+
+### Coverage
+- [ ] **Critical paths covered** - Are happy paths tested?
+- [ ] **Error paths covered** - Are error scenarios tested?
+- [ ] **Regression tests** - Are existing tests still passing?
+
+---
+
+## 6. Documentation
+
+### Code Documentation
+- [ ] **Complex logic documented** - Are tricky parts explained?
+- [ ] **Public APIs documented** - Are exported functions documented?
+- [ ] **Type definitions** - Are types properly defined (if using TS)?
+- [ ] **README updated** - Is project README current?
+
+### API Documentation
+- [ ] **Endpoints documented** - Are new endpoints in API docs?
+- [ ] **Request/response examples** - Are examples provided?
+- [ ] **Error codes documented** - Are error responses documented?
+
+### Change Documentation
+- [ ] **Commit messages clear** - Are commits well-described?
+- [ ] **PR description complete** - Does PR explain the change?
+- [ ] **Changelog updated** - Is the change logged?
+
+---
+
+## 7. Architecture Compliance
+
+### Design Patterns
+- [ ] **Follows architecture** - Does code align with technical outline?
+- [ ] **Consistent patterns** - Are established patterns followed?
+- [ ] **No anti-patterns** - Are known anti-patterns avoided?
+- [ ] **Proper separation** - Are concerns properly separated?
+
+### Dependencies
+- [ ] **Minimal new deps** - Are new dependencies justified?
+- [ ] **Deps up to date** - Are dependencies recent and maintained?
+- [ ] **No security vulnerabilities** - Do deps pass security audit?
+- [ ] **License compatible** - Are dependency licenses compatible?
+
+---
+
+## 8. Deployment Readiness
+
+### Configuration
+- [ ] **Environment variables** - Are new env vars documented?
+- [ ] **Feature flags** - Are feature flags used appropriately?
+- [ ] **Database migrations** - Are migrations reversible?
+- [ ] **Backward compatible** - Is the change backward compatible?
+
+### Monitoring
+- [ ] **Logging added** - Are important events logged?
+- [ ] **Metrics tracked** - Are key metrics measured?
+- [ ] **Alerts configured** - Are alerts set for failures?
+- [ ] **Error tracking** - Are errors captured in monitoring?
+
+### Rollback
+- [ ] **Rollback plan** - Can this change be reverted?
+- [ ] **Data migrations reversible** - Can data changes be undone?
+- [ ] **Feature flag kill switch** - Can the feature be disabled?
+
+---
+
+## Overall Assessment
+
+### Completeness Score
+Count the checked items above: ____ / 70
+
+### Scoring Guide
+- **63-70**: Excellent - Ready to merge
+- **55-62**: Good - Minor issues, can merge with notes
+- **45-54**: Fair - Should address issues before merging
+- **Below 45**: Needs Work - Significant issues to resolve
+
+### Blockers (Must Fix)
+Issues that must be resolved before merging:
+1.
+2.
+3.
+
+### Warnings (Should Fix)
+Issues that should be addressed but aren't blocking:
+1.
+2.
+3.
+
+### Suggestions (Nice to Have)
+Improvements for future consideration:
+1.
+2.
+3.
+
+---
+
+## Verdict
+
+**Ready to merge?**
+
+- [ ] **APPROVE** - Code is ready to merge
+- [ ] **APPROVE WITH COMMENTS** - Minor issues noted, can merge
+- [ ] **REQUEST CHANGES** - Issues must be addressed first
+
+**Reviewer:**
+
+**Date:**
+
+**Notes:**
+