code-ai-installer 1.1.11 → 1.3.0

package/locales/en/.agents/design_parity_review/SKILL.md

@@ -1,90 +1,216 @@
----
+---
 name: design_parity_review
-description: Compare design artifacts with the UX Spec or with the implemented UI. Issue a Design Parity Report with P0/P1/P2 priorities and specific recommendations.
+description: Compare design artifacts with the UX Spec or with the implemented UI. Produce a Design Parity Report with P0/P1/P2 priorities and specific recommendations.
+---
+
+# Skill: Design Parity Review
+
+Compare the design with the UX Spec and/or the implemented UI.
+
+**Sections:**
+1. [Workflow](#1-workflow)
+2. [Review Modes](#2-modes)
+3. [Comparison Table](#3-comparison)
+4. [Severity Guide](#4-severity)
+5. [Example: Settings Screen](#5-example)
+6. [Output Template](#6-output)
+
+---
+
+## 1. Workflow
+
+```
+1. Input:
+   ├── Design Reference Map + Design Rules (from $design_intake)
+   ├── UX Spec (from $ux_spec) — for Mode A
+   └── Implemented UI (screenshots/browser) — for Mode B
+
+2. For each screen in Design Reference Map:
+   a. Open design source (file/frame)
+   b. Open comparison target (UX Spec or implemented UI)
+   c. Fill comparison table (section 3)
+   d. Classify each discrepancy (section 4)
+
+3. Summarize: pass / discrepancies by severity
+
+4. Generate recommendations (DEV-xx / UX-xx tasks)
+```
+
+---
+
+## 2. Review Modes
+
+### Mode A: Design ↔ UX Spec (before development)
+
+**Purpose:** Ensure UX Spec accurately reflects design intent before dev starts.
+
+| Check | What to compare | Look for |
+|-------|----------------|---------|
+| Layout | Design layout → UX Spec layout description | Missing/wrong columns, ordering |
+| Sections | Design sections → UX Spec "Sections & Components" | Missing sections, wrong hierarchy |
+| Actions | Design CTAs → UX Spec "Primary Actions" | Missing actions, wrong labels |
+| Forms | Design fields → UX Spec "Forms & Validation" | Missing fields, wrong types |
+| States | Design state screens → UX Spec "States" | Missing states (loading/empty/error) |
+| Content | Design labels/copy → UX Spec content | Wrong text, missing copy |
+| Components | Design components → UI Inventory | Unmapped components |
+
+### Mode B: Design ↔ Implemented UI (after development)
+
+**Purpose:** Ensure implementation matches design.
+
+| Check | What to compare | How to verify |
+|-------|----------------|--------------|
+| Visual layout | Design → screenshot | Side-by-side comparison |
+| Colors | Design palette → CSS variables | Inspect computed styles |
+| Typography | Design fonts → computed styles | Inspect font-family, size, weight |
+| Spacing | Design padding/margins → computed | Inspect box model |
+| Components | Design variants → rendered components | Visual + props check |
+| States | Design states → trigger each state | Navigate through states |
+| Responsiveness | Design breakpoints → resize browser | Test at each breakpoint |
+| Icons | Design icon set → rendered icons | Visual comparison |
+
+---
+
+## 3. Comparison Table
+
+### Per-screen comparison template
+
+```markdown
+### Screen: <Name>
+
+| # | Aspect | Design (Expected) | Actual (Spec/UI) | Match? | Severity | Notes |
+|---|--------|-------------------|------------------|:------:|:--------:|-------|
+| 1 | Layout | 2-column: 60/40 | 2-column: 60/40 | ✅ | — | — |
+| 2 | Header | Title + breadcrumbs | Title only | ❌ | P2 | Breadcrumbs not in design |
+| 3 | Save button | Blue primary, bottom-right | Blue primary, bottom-right | ✅ | — | — |
+| 4 | Error state | Inline red text under field | Toast only | ❌ | P1 | Missing inline errors |
+| 5 | Loading | Skeleton | Spinner | ❌ | P1 | Should be skeleton |
+| 6 | Tab active | Underline | Background fill | ❌ | P1 | Wrong tab style |
+| 7 | Color picker | 4-token picker | 4-token picker | ✅ | — | — |
+```
+
+### Design Rules verification
+
+```markdown
+| Rule | Expected | Actual | Status |
+|------|----------|--------|:------:|
+| DR-01: Primary CTA is blue #116DFF | Blue filled button | ✅ Blue filled | ✅ |
+| DR-03: Timer digits monospace | Monospace font | Serif font | ❌ P1 |
+| DR-05: 2-column layout 60/40 | 60/40 split | 50/50 split | ❌ P1 |
+```
+
+---
+
+## 4. Severity Guide
+
+| Severity | Criteria | Examples |
+|----------|---------|---------|
+| 🔴 **P0 (Blocker)** | Breaks critical flow, misleads user, data loss risk, contradicts PRD | Wrong form field type, missing required validation, CTA leads to wrong action |
+| 🟠 **P1 (Important)** | Breaks consistency, degrades UX, noticeable deviation | Wrong loading pattern (spinner vs skeleton), missing error state, wrong colors |
+| 🟡 **P2 (Nice-to-have)** | Cosmetic, polish, minor spacing/alignment | 2px alignment off, slightly wrong border-radius, extra whitespace |
+
+### Decision tree
+
+```
+Discrepancy found:
+├── Does it break a user flow? → P0
+├── Does it break consistency or UX quality? → P1
+├── Is it visual polish only? → P2
+└── Is it subjective / taste? → Not a finding (skip)
+```
+
+---
+
+## 5. Example: Settings Screen
+
+```markdown
+### Screen: Settings — Design Tab
+
+**Design source:** UX Spec + Glassmorphism Spec
+**Compared with:** Implemented UI (screenshot)
+
+| # | Aspect | Design | Implemented | Match? | Sev |
+|---|--------|--------|------------|:------:|:---:|
+| 1 | Layout | 2-column: config + preview | ✅ 2-column | ✅ | — |
+| 2 | Color pickers | 4 tokens (bg, text, accent, overlay) | 3 pickers (missing overlay) | ❌ | P0 |
+| 3 | Font select | Dropdown with preview | Plain dropdown | ❌ | P1 |
+| 4 | Live preview | Updates on change | Updates on save only | ❌ | P1 |
+| 5 | Tab underline | 2px underline accent color | Background highlight | ❌ | P2 |
+| 6 | Save button | Bottom of panel, primary | ✅ Bottom, primary | ✅ | — |
+
+### Design Rules Check
+| Rule | Status |
+|------|:------:|
+| DR-01: 4-color token system | ❌ Missing overlay picker |
+| DR-02: Timer monospace | ✅ |
+| DR-05: 60/40 layout | ✅ |
+
+### Findings: 1× P0, 2× P1, 1× P2
+```
+
+---
+
+## 6. Output Template
+
+```markdown
+# Design Parity Report
+
+**Mode:** A (Design ↔ UX Spec) / B (Design ↔ Implemented UI)
+**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
+**Reviewer:** UX/UI Designer Agent
+**Design source:** <reference>
+**Compared with:** <UX Spec / Implemented UI>
+
+## Summary
+| Status | Screens | Findings |
+|--------|:-------:|:--------:|
+| ✅ Match | X | — |
+| ❌ Discrepancies | Y | Z total |
+
+## Per-Screen Comparison
+<section 3 tables × N screens>
+
+## Design Rules Verification
+<section 3 rules table>
+
+## Findings Summary
+
+| # | Severity | Screen | Aspect | Expected | Actual | Fix |
+|---|----------|--------|--------|----------|--------|-----|
+| 1 | 🔴 P0 | Design tab | Color pickers | 4 tokens | 3 tokens | Add overlay picker |
+| 2 | 🟠 P1 | Design tab | Font select | Preview dropdown | Plain dropdown | Add font preview |
+| 3 | 🟠 P1 | Design tab | Live preview | Update on change | Update on save | Wire onChange handlers |
+| 4 | 🟡 P2 | Design tab | Tab style | Underline | Background | CSS change |
+
+## ✅ What Matches
+- Layout structure (2-column, 60/40)
+- Save button placement and style
+- Timer digit formatting
+- Color picker component for 3/4 tokens
+
+## Recommendations
+| ID | Type | Action | Priority |
+|----|------|--------|:--------:|
+| DEV-01 | Code | Add overlay color picker to Design tab | P0 |
+| DEV-02 | Code | Wire live preview onChange | P1 |
+| UX-01 | Spec | Update UX Spec with font preview requirement | P1 |
+| DEV-03 | CSS | Change tab active style to underline | P2 |
+
+## Conflicts
+| # | Design says | PRD/Architecture says | Recommendation |
+|---|-----------|----------------------|----------------|
+| — | _(none)_ | — | — |
+
+## Verdict
+- ✅ **PARITY** — all screens match design
+- ⚠️ **DEVIATIONS** — P0/P1 findings to fix
+- ❌ **SIGNIFICANT MISMATCH** — redesign or major rework needed
+```
+
 ---
 
-# Skill: Design Parity Review (design verification)
-
-## Goal
-Check the compliance of the UX Spec and/or implemented UI with the provided design materials and record any discrepancies.
-
-## When to use
-- After preparing the UX Spec (Design ↔ UX Spec)
-- After implementing the UI (Design ↔ Implemented UI)
-- Before closing the release increment (as part of the DoD if there is a design)
-
-## Inputs
-- Design Reference Map and Rules (from `$design_intake`)
-- UX Spec (if we check the spec)
-- UI implementation (if we check the code):
-  - links/routes, how to reproduce states
-  - screenshots/videos/Storybook (if available)
-  - e2e/visual results (if available)
-
-## Mandatory decision before parity review
-Before planning parity verification, the designer must ask this mandatory question:
-- `Can Playwright be used?`
-
-Decision logic:
-- If `Yes`: use the automated scenario (Playwright screenshot tests + visual diff + agreed threshold + CI artifacts).
-- If `No`: use the restricted-infrastructure scenario:
-  - manual parity verification via Design Audit Mode/overlay (or approved equivalent),
-  - evidence package: reference/actual screenshots + environment params (browser/viewport/DPR/zoom) + checklist,
-  - mandatory designer sign-off with `PASS/FAIL`.
-- If there is no answer: record `P0 / BLOCKER: Parity verification mode is not approved`.
-
-Execution cadence (mandatory when design files exist):
-- run parity after every `DEV-xx` slice (`UX-PARITY-xx`);
-- run final parity before `RG`;
-- if final parity is not `PASS`, release must be blocked as `P0 / BLOCKER`.
-
-## Check modes
-### Mode A: Design ↔ UX Spec (no code yet)
-Check each screen:
-- composition of sections and their order
-- main actions/CTAs
-- forms: fields, mandatory, validation, error texts
-- states: loading/empty/error/success
-- matching components with inventory/guides
-Output: list of edits to UX Spec + questions/conflicts.
-
-### Mode B: Design ↔ Implemented UI (UI has already been implemented)
-Check for each key screen and status:
-- layout/hierarchy (what is located where, what is visible first)
-- availability and options for components (buttons, inputs, tables, modals)
-- texts/labels/placeholders/error messages (if the design specifies them)
-- UI status (loading/empty/error/success)
-- basic a11y (keyboard/focus/labels/ARIA) by `$a11y_baseline`
-
-## Classification of discrepancies
-- **P0 (Blocker)**: breaks critical flow, is misleading, violates accessibility, leads to errors/data loss, contradicts PRD.
-- **P1 (Important)**: breaks consistency, degrades UX, but does not block use.
-- **P2 (Nice-to-have)**: cosmetics/polish.
-
-## Output: Design Parity Report (required structure)
-### ✅ Matches
-- ...
-
-### ⚠️ Discrepancies
-#### P0 (Blockers)
-- [ ] <what's wrong> - Screen/Component: ... - Expected: ... - Actual: ... - Fix: ...
-
-#### P1 (Important)
-- [ ] ...
-
-#### P2 (Nice-to-have)
-- [ ] ...
-
-### Recommendations for correction
-- DEV-xx: ...
-- UX-xx: ...
-
-### Conflicts (if any)
-- Conflict: <design vs PRD/architecture> → solution options
-
-## Response format
-### Summary
-### Deliverables (Design Parity Report)
-### Findings (P0/P1/P2)
-###Risks/Blockers
-### Next Actions (IDs: UX-xx / DEV-xx)
+## See also
+- `$design_intake` — design sources inventory (input)
+- `$ux_spec` — UX Spec (comparison target)
+- `$ui_inventory` — component inventory
+- `$qa_browser_testing` — capture screenshots for comparison

package/locales/en/.agents/design_parity_review/agents/claude.json

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+{
+  "name": "design_parity_review",
+  "display_name": "Design Parity Review",
+  "description": "Compare design artifacts with the UX Spec or with the implemented UI. Produce a Design Parity Report with P0/P1/P2 priorities and specific recommendations.",
+  "default_prompt": "Use $design_parity_review when the task matches the \"Design Parity Review\" skill.",
+  "triggers": [
+    "design_parity_review",
+    "design parity review",
+    "Compare design artifacts with the UX Spec or with the implemented UI"
+  ],
+  "capabilities": [
+    "design",
+    "parity",
+    "review"
+  ],
+  "tools": [],
+  "implicit_invocation": true
+}

package/locales/en/.agents/design_parity_review/agents/copilot.json

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+{
+  "name": "design_parity_review",
+  "display_name": "Design Parity Review",
+  "description": "Compare design artifacts with the UX Spec or with the implemented UI. Produce a Design Parity Report with P0/P1/P2 priorities and specific recommendations.",
+  "default_prompt": "Use $design_parity_review when the task matches the \"Design Parity Review\" skill.",
+  "triggers": [
+    "design_parity_review",
+    "design parity review",
+    "Compare design artifacts with the UX Spec or with the implemented UI"
+  ],
+  "capabilities": [
+    "design",
+    "parity",
+    "review"
+  ],
+  "tools": [],
+  "implicit_invocation": true
+}

package/locales/en/.agents/design_parity_review/agents/gemini.json

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+{
+  "name": "design_parity_review",
+  "display_name": "Design Parity Review",
+  "description": "Compare design artifacts with the UX Spec or with the implemented UI. Produce a Design Parity Report with P0/P1/P2 priorities and specific recommendations.",
+  "default_prompt": "Use $design_parity_review when the task matches the \"Design Parity Review\" skill.",
+  "triggers": [
+    "design_parity_review",
+    "design parity review",
+    "Compare design artifacts with the UX Spec or with the implemented UI"
+  ],
+  "capabilities": [
+    "design",
+    "parity",
+    "review"
+  ],
+  "tools": [],
+  "implicit_invocation": true
+}

package/locales/en/.agents/design_parity_review/agents/openai.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+interface:
+  display_name: "Design Parity Review"
+  short_description: "Compare design artifacts with the UX Spec or with the implemented UI. Produce a Design Parity R…"
+  default_prompt: "Use $design_parity_review when the task matches the \"Design Parity Review\" skill."
+dependencies:
+  tools: []
+policy:
+  allow_implicit_invocation: true

package/locales/en/.agents/design_parity_review/agents/qwen.json

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+{
+  "name": "design_parity_review",
+  "display_name": "Design Parity Review",
+  "description": "Compare design artifacts with the UX Spec or with the implemented UI. Produce a Design Parity Report with P0/P1/P2 priorities and specific recommendations.",
+  "default_prompt": "Use $design_parity_review when the task matches the \"Design Parity Review\" skill.",
+  "triggers": [
+    "design_parity_review",
+    "design parity review",
+    "Compare design artifacts with the UX Spec or with the implemented UI"
+  ],
+  "capabilities": [
+    "design",
+    "parity",
+    "review"
+  ],
+  "tools": [],
+  "implicit_invocation": true
+}

package/locales/en/.agents/design_parity_review/agents/skill.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+version: 1
+name: "design_parity_review"
+display_name: "Design Parity Review"
+description: "Compare design artifacts with the UX Spec or with the implemented UI. Produce a Design Parity Report with P0/P1/P2 priorities and specific recommendations."
+default_prompt: "Use $design_parity_review when the task matches the \"Design Parity Review\" skill."
+triggers:
+  - "design_parity_review"
+  - "design parity review"
+  - "Compare design artifacts with the UX Spec or with the implemented UI"
+capabilities:
+  - "design"
+  - "parity"
+  - "review"
+tools: []
+invocation:
+  explicit: true
+  implicit: true
+localization:
+  default_locale: "en"
+  available_locales:
+    - "ru"
+    - "en"