claudify-agent 1.0.1 → 1.0.3

package/.claude/skills/tool-selection/SKILL.md

@@ -1,428 +1,433 @@
-# SKILL.md: Optimal Tool Selection
-
-## Description
-Automatically select best tools for each plan step based on task type, complexity, and available resources.
-
-## When to Use
-- Creating implementation plans
-- Deciding which tools to use
-- Optimizing workflow efficiency
-- Troubleshooting tool failures
-
-## Capabilities
-- Tool selection decision tree
-- Cost/complexity analysis
-- Fallback tool identification
-- Tool combination strategies
-
-## Tool Selection Rules
-
-### For Exploration
-
-| Goal | Tool | When |
-|------|------|------|
-| Read single file | Read | Know exact path |
-| Find multiple files | Glob + Read | Pattern matching |
-| Exact text search | Grep | Specific strings/symbols |
-| Conceptual search | SemanticSearch | Behavior/pattern |
-| Broad exploration | Task (explore) | Multi-file investigation |
-
-### For Implementation
-
-| Goal | Tool | When |
-|------|------|------|
-| New file | Write | Creating from scratch |
-| Small edit (<50 lines) | StrReplace | Targeted changes |
-| Large rewrite (>50 lines) | Write | Replace entire file |
-| Jupyter notebook | EditNotebook | Cell-level edits |
-
-### For Validation
-
-| Goal | Tool | When |
-|------|------|------|
-| Code quality | ReadLints | After edits |
-| Functionality | Shell (tests) | Run test suite |
-| Visual changes | Browser/Screenshot | UI verification |
-| User feedback | AskQuestion | Decisions needed |
-
-### For Complex Tasks
-
-| Goal | Tool | When |
-|------|------|------|
-| Multi-step tracking | TodoWrite | 3+ steps |
-| Ambiguous requirements | AskQuestion | Clarification needed |
-| Risky changes | Checkpoints | Before breaking changes |
-| Iterative fixes | /grind loop | Tests failing |
-
-## Decision Trees
-
-### "I need to find code"
-
-```
-Know file path?
-├─ Yes → Read
-└─ No
-   ├─ Exact text/symbol?
-   │  ├─ Yes → Grep
-   │  └─ No
-   │     ├─ Concept/behavior?
-   │     │  ├─ Yes → SemanticSearch
-   │     │  └─ No
-   │     └─ Broad exploration?
-   │        ├─ Yes → Task (explore)
-   │        └─ No → Glob
-```
-
-### "I need to modify code"
-
-```
-Jupyter notebook?
-├─ Yes → EditNotebook
-└─ No
-   ├─ New file?
-   │  ├─ Yes → Write
-   │  └─ No
-   │     ├─ <50 lines change?
-   │     │  ├─ Yes → StrReplace
-   │     │  └─ No → Write (replace entire file)
-```
-
-### "I need to verify"
-
-```
-Linting issues?
-├─ Yes → ReadLints
-└─ No
-   ├─ Tests needed?
-   │  ├─ Yes → Shell (npm run test)
-   │  └─ No
-   │     ├─ Visual changes?
-   │     │  ├─ Yes → Browser/Screenshot
-   │     │  └─ No
-   │     └─ User approval?
-   │        ├─ Yes → AskQuestion
-   │        └─ No → Continue
-```
-
-### "I need to automate browser"
-
-```
-Need performance profiling?
-├─ Yes → cursor-ide-browser (has profiling)
-└─ No
-   ├─ Need Lighthouse audits?
-   │  ├─ Yes → user-chrome-devtools
-   │  └─ No
-   │     ├─ Need cross-browser testing?
-   │     │  ├─ Yes → user-playwright
-   │     │  └─ No
-   │     └─ Quick testing?
-   │        ├─ Yes → Built-in Browser (7 capabilities)
-   │        └─ No → user-selenium (accessibility)
-```
-
-## Tool Cost Hierarchy
-
-**Start cheap, escalate as needed:**
-
-```
-Tier 1 (Cheapest, fastest):
-- Read (single file)
-- Glob (file finding)
-- Grep (exact text)
-
-Tier 2 (Moderate cost):
-- SemanticSearch (conceptual)
-- StrReplace (edits)
-- Write (new files)
-
-Tier 3 (Higher cost):
-- Task (subagents)
-- Shell (command execution)
-- ReadLints (analysis)
-
-Tier 4 (Most expensive):
-- Multiple parallel subagents
-- Browser automation (MCP)
-- Complex multi-tool workflows
-```
-
-## Tool Combinations
-
-### Common Patterns
-
-**Pattern 1: Feature Implementation**
-```
-1. SemanticSearch: Find patterns
-2. Read: Study examples
-3. Write: Create new files
-4. Shell: Run tests
-5. ReadLints: Verify quality
-```
-
-**Pattern 2: Bug Fix**
-```
-1. Grep: Find related code
-2. Read: Understand issue
-3. StrReplace: Fix code
-4. Shell: Run tests
-5. ReadLints: Check quality
-```
-
-**Pattern 3: Refactor**
-```
-1. Task (explore): Map all usages
-2. SemanticSearch: Find patterns
-3. Read: Review current code
-4. Checkpoint: Before changes
-5. StrReplace: Incremental changes
-6. Shell: Run tests after each
-7. ReadLints: Verify quality
-```
-
-**Pattern 4: Code Review**
-```
-1. Glob: Find changed files
-2. Read: Review diffs
-3. ReadLints: Check for issues
-4. Shell: Run tests
-5. AskQuestion: Clarify if needed
-```
-
-## Examples
-
-### Example 1: Add API Endpoint
-
-User: "Add /api/products endpoint"
-
-Tool sequence:
-1. **SemanticSearch**: "Find API route patterns"
-   - Result: app/api/users/route.ts
-
-2. **Read**: Existing route file
-   - Understand pattern
-
-3. **Write**: New route file
-   - Create app/api/products/route.ts
-
-4. **Shell**: Run tests
-   - Command: npm run test -- products.test.ts
-
-5. **ReadLints**: Check for errors
-   - Verify quality
-
-**Why these tools**:
-- SemanticSearch: Find pattern (conceptual)
-- Read: Study example (single file)
-- Write: New file (creation)
-- Shell: Validate (tests)
-- ReadLints: Quality gate
-
-### Example 2: Refactor Authentication
-
-User: "Refactor auth system"
-
-Tool sequence:
-1. **Task (explore)**: "Find all auth code"
-   - Parallel: JWT, sessions, OAuth, hashing
-
-2. **SemanticSearch**: "Find token validation"
-   - Result: src/auth/validateToken.ts
-
-3. **Read**: Auth files
-   - Understand current implementation
-
-4. **Checkpoint**: Before breaking changes
-   - Rollback point
-
-5. **StrReplace**: Incremental changes
-   - Small, safe edits
-
-6. **Shell**: Run auth tests
-   - After each change
-
-7. **ReadLints**: Verify quality
-   - Zero new lints
-
-**Why these tools**:
-- Task: Broad exploration (complex)
-- SemanticSearch: Specific patterns
-- Read: Understanding
-- Checkpoint: Safety (risky change)
-- StrReplace: Targeted edits
-- Shell + ReadLints: Validation
-
-### Example 3: Fix Bug
-
-User: "Fix login bug"
-
-Tool sequence:
-1. **Grep**: "Find login function"
-   - Exact text search
-
-2. **Read**: Login code
-   - Understand issue
-
-3. **ReadLints**: Check for errors
-   - Identify problems
-
-4. **StrReplace**: Fix code
-   - Targeted fix
-
-5. **Shell**: Run login tests
-   - Verify fix
-
-6. **ReadLints**: Final check
-   - Quality gate
-
-**Why these tools**:
-- Grep: Exact search (cheap)
-- Read: Understanding
-- ReadLints: Find issues
-- StrReplace: Small fix
-- Shell + ReadLints: Validate
-
-## Anti-Patterns
-
-### ❌ Using Expensive Tools When Cheap Works
-
-Bad: Task subagent to find single file
-Good: Read (know path) or Glob (pattern)
-
-### ❌ Using Wrong Tool for Job
-
-Bad: Grep for conceptual search
-Good: SemanticSearch for behavior
-
-### ❌ Skipping Validation
-
-Bad: Edit without ReadLints
-Good: Always validate after substantive changes
-
-### ❌ No Checkpoints for Risky Changes
-
-Bad: Refactor without rollback
-Good: Checkpoint before breaking changes
-
-## Automatic Tool Selection Workflow
-
-### Decision Matrix (Automatic, No User Input)
-
-```
-Task Type → Tool Sequence
-─────────────────────────
-"Find [symbol/text]" → Grep → Read
-"Find [pattern/concept]" → SemanticSearch → Task (if broad)
-"Add [feature]" → Research patterns → Write/StrReplace → ReadLints → Shell
-"Fix [bug]" → Grep/SemanticSearch → Read → StrReplace → ReadLints → Shell
-"Refactor [X]" → Task (explore) → Checkpoint → StrReplace → ReadLints → Shell
-"Test [feature]" → Read existing tests → Write tests → Shell → ReadLints
-```
-
-### MCP Server Selection (Automatic)
-
-```
-User Request → MCP Server
-─────────────────────────
-"UI", "visual", "browser" → cursor-ide-browser
-"PR", "issue", "github" → user-github
-"lint", "quality" → user-ESLint
-"how to [library]", "[framework] setup" → user-context7
-```
-
-## Tool Escalation Protocol
-
-**Rule**: Start with Tier 1, escalate only if needed
-
-```
-Tier 1 (Try First):
-- Read: Know exact file path
-- Glob: Pattern matching
-- Grep: Exact text search
-
-If Tier 1 fails → Escalate to Tier 2:
-- SemanticSearch: Conceptual search
-- StrReplace: Small edits
-- Write: New files
-
-If Tier 2 insufficient → Escalate to Tier 3:
-- Task: Complex exploration
-- Shell: Run commands/tests
-- ReadLints: Quality checks
-
-If Tier 3 inadequate → Escalate to Tier 4:
-- Parallel subagents: Multi-angle exploration
-- Browser MCP: Visual verification
-- Complex workflows: Multi-step automation
-```
-
-## Automatic Validation Rules
-
-**After EVERY Code Change**:
-1. ReadLints on modified files
-2. Fix introduced lints immediately
-3. If tests exist → run relevant tests
-4. Update TodoWrite if tracking
-
-**Before EVERY Commit**:
-1. Run full test suite
-2. Run linter
-3. Run typecheck
-4. Create checkpoint if breaking change
-
-## Examples
-
-### Example: Automatic Tool Selection
-
-User: "Add authentication to checkout"
-
-Agent automatically selects:
-1. **SemanticSearch**: "How is authentication implemented?" (Tier 2)
-2. **Read**: `@src/auth/validateToken.ts` (Tier 1)
-3. **StrReplace**: Add auth to checkout (Tier 2)
-4. **ReadLints**: Verify quality (Tier 3, automatic)
-5. **Shell**: Run auth tests (Tier 3, automatic)
-
-### Example: Automatic MCP Use
-
-User: "Fix issue #123"
-
-Agent automatically:
-1. **user-github**: Fetch issue #123
-2. **Grep**: Find related code
-3. **StrReplace**: Implement fix
-4. **user-ESLint**: Check quality
-5. **user-github**: Create PR linking issue
-
----
-
-## Troubleshooting
-
-### Tool Not Available
-
-**Problem**: Selected tool not accessible
-
-**Solutions**:
-1. Check MCP server running
-2. Use alternative tool
-3. Fallback to manual approach
-
-### Tool Taking Too Long
-
-**Problem**: Tool execution slow
-
-**Solutions**:
-1. Use model="fast" for subagents
-2. Narrow scope (target_directories)
-3. Try cheaper alternative
-4. Time-box execution
-
-### Tool Failing Repeatedly
-
-**Problem**: Tool errors persist
-
-**Solutions**:
-1. Check parameters
-2. Verify permissions
-3. Try alternative approach
-4. Report blocker
+---
+name: tool-selection
+description: Decision trees for choosing the cheapest effective Claude Code tool (Read, Glob, Grep, Edit, Bash, Agent, MCP) per step. Use when planning steps or tool usage feels expensive.
+---
+
+# SKILL.md: Optimal Tool Selection
+
+## Description
+Automatically select best tools for each plan step based on task type, complexity, and available resources.
+
+## When to Use
+- Creating implementation plans
+- Deciding which tools to use
+- Optimizing workflow efficiency
+- Troubleshooting tool failures
+
+## Capabilities
+- Tool selection decision tree
+- Cost/complexity analysis
+- Fallback tool identification
+- Tool combination strategies
+
+## Tool Selection Rules
+
+### For Exploration
+
+| Goal | Tool | When |
+|------|------|------|
+| Read single file | Read | Know exact path |
+| Find multiple files | Glob + Read | Pattern matching |
+| Exact text search | Grep | Specific strings/symbols |
+| Conceptual search | Explore (quick) | Behavior/pattern |
+| Broad exploration | Agent (Explore) | Multi-file investigation |
+
+### For Implementation
+
+| Goal | Tool | When |
+|------|------|------|
+| New file | Write | Creating from scratch |
+| Small edit (<50 lines) | Edit | Targeted changes |
+| Large rewrite (>50 lines) | Write | Replace entire file |
+| Jupyter notebook | NotebookEdit | Cell-level edits |
+
+### For Validation
+
+| Goal | Tool | When |
+|------|------|------|
+| Code quality | Lint check | After edits |
+| Functionality | Bash (tests) | Run test suite |
+| Visual changes | Browser/Screenshot | UI verification |
+| User feedback | AskUserQuestion | Decisions needed |
+
+### For Complex Tasks
+
+| Goal | Tool | When |
+|------|------|------|
+| Multi-step tracking | TodoWrite | 3+ steps |
+| Ambiguous requirements | AskUserQuestion | Clarification needed |
+| Risky changes | Checkpoints | Before breaking changes |
+| Iterative fixes | fix-and-retest loop | Tests failing |
+
+## Decision Trees
+
+### "I need to find code"
+
+```
+Know file path?
+├─ Yes → Read
+└─ No
+   ├─ Exact text/symbol?
+   │  ├─ Yes → Grep
+   │  └─ No
+   │     ├─ Concept/behavior?
+   │     │  ├─ Yes → Explore (quick)
+   │     │  └─ No
+   │     └─ Broad exploration?
+   │        ├─ Yes → Agent (Explore)
+   │        └─ No → Glob
+```
+
+### "I need to modify code"
+
+```
+Jupyter notebook?
+├─ Yes → NotebookEdit
+└─ No
+   ├─ New file?
+   │  ├─ Yes → Write
+   │  └─ No
+   │     ├─ <50 lines change?
+   │     │  ├─ Yes → Edit
+   │     │  └─ No → Write (replace entire file)
+```
+
+### "I need to verify"
+
+```
+Linting issues?
+├─ Yes → Lint check
+└─ No
+   ├─ Tests needed?
+   │  ├─ Yes → Bash (npm run test)
+   │  └─ No
+   │     ├─ Visual changes?
+   │     │  ├─ Yes → Browser/Screenshot
+   │     │  └─ No
+   │     └─ User approval?
+   │        ├─ Yes → AskUserQuestion
+   │        └─ No → Continue
+```
+
+### "I need to automate browser"
+
+```
+Need performance profiling?
+├─ Yes → chrome-devtools (performance traces)
+└─ No
+   ├─ Need Lighthouse audits?
+   │  ├─ Yes → chrome-devtools
+   │  └─ No
+   │     ├─ Need cross-browser testing?
+   │     │  ├─ Yes → playwright
+   │     │  └─ No
+   │     └─ Quick testing?
+   │        ├─ Yes → claude-in-chrome (`/chrome`)
+   │        └─ No → selenium (accessibility)
+```
+
+## Tool Cost Hierarchy
+
+**Start cheap, escalate as needed:**
+
+```
+Tier 1 (Cheapest, fastest):
+- Read (single file)
+- Glob (file finding)
+- Grep (exact text)
+
+Tier 2 (Moderate cost):
+- Explore (quick) (conceptual)
+- Edit (edits)
+- Write (new files)
+
+Tier 3 (Higher cost):
+- Agent (subagents)
+- Bash (command execution)
+- Lint check (analysis)
+
+Tier 4 (Most expensive):
+- Multiple parallel subagents
+- Browser automation (MCP)
+- Complex multi-tool workflows
+```
+
+## Tool Combinations
+
+### Common Patterns
+
+**Pattern 1: Feature Implementation**
+```
+1. Explore (quick): Find patterns
+2. Read: Study examples
+3. Write: Create new files
+4. Bash: Run tests
+5. Lint check: Verify quality
+```
+
+**Pattern 2: Bug Fix**
+```
+1. Grep: Find related code
+2. Read: Understand issue
+3. Edit: Fix code
+4. Bash: Run tests
+5. Lint check: Check quality
+```
+
+**Pattern 3: Refactor**
+```
+1. Agent (Explore): Map all usages
+2. Explore (quick): Find patterns
+3. Read: Review current code
+4. Checkpoint: Before changes
+5. Edit: Incremental changes
+6. Bash: Run tests after each
+7. Lint check: Verify quality
+```
+
+**Pattern 4: Code Review**
+```
+1. Glob: Find changed files
+2. Read: Review diffs
+3. Lint check: Check for issues
+4. Bash: Run tests
+5. AskUserQuestion: Clarify if needed
+```
+
+## Examples
+
+### Example 1: Add API Endpoint
+
+User: "Add /api/products endpoint"
+
+Tool sequence:
+1. **Explore (quick)**: "Find API route patterns"
+   - Result: app/api/users/route.ts
+
+2. **Read**: Existing route file
+   - Understand pattern
+
+3. **Write**: New route file
+   - Create app/api/products/route.ts
+
+4. **Bash**: Run tests
+   - Command: npm run test -- products.test.ts
+
+5. **Lint check**: Check for errors
+   - Verify quality
+
+**Why these tools**:
+- Explore (quick): Find pattern (conceptual)
+- Read: Study example (single file)
+- Write: New file (creation)
+- Bash: Validate (tests)
+- Lint check: Quality gate
+
+### Example 2: Refactor Authentication
+
+User: "Refactor auth system"
+
+Tool sequence:
+1. **Agent (Explore)**: "Find all auth code"
+   - Parallel: JWT, sessions, OAuth, hashing
+
+2. **Explore (quick)**: "Find token validation"
+   - Result: src/auth/validateToken.ts
+
+3. **Read**: Auth files
+   - Understand current implementation
+
+4. **Checkpoint**: Before breaking changes
+   - Rollback point
+
+5. **Edit**: Incremental changes
+   - Small, safe edits
+
+6. **Bash**: Run auth tests
+   - After each change
+
+7. **Lint check**: Verify quality
+   - Zero new lints
+
+**Why these tools**:
+- Agent: Broad exploration (complex)
+- Explore (quick): Specific patterns
+- Read: Understanding
+- Checkpoint: Safety (risky change)
+- Edit: Targeted edits
+- Bash + Lint check: Validation
+
+### Example 3: Fix Bug
+
+User: "Fix login bug"
+
+Tool sequence:
+1. **Grep**: "Find login function"
+   - Exact text search
+
+2. **Read**: Login code
+   - Understand issue
+
+3. **Lint check**: Check for errors
+   - Identify problems
+
+4. **Edit**: Fix code
+   - Targeted fix
+
+5. **Bash**: Run login tests
+   - Verify fix
+
+6. **Lint check**: Final check
+   - Quality gate
+
+**Why these tools**:
+- Grep: Exact search (cheap)
+- Read: Understanding
+- Lint check: Find issues
+- Edit: Small fix
+- Bash + Lint check: Validate
+
+## Anti-Patterns
+
+### ❌ Using Expensive Tools When Cheap Works
+
+Bad: Agent subagent to find single file
+Good: Read (know path) or Glob (pattern)
+
+### ❌ Using Wrong Tool for Job
+
+Bad: Grep for conceptual search
+Good: Explore (quick) for behavior
+
+### ❌ Skipping Validation
+
+Bad: Edit without Lint check
+Good: Always validate after substantive changes
+
+### ❌ No Checkpoints for Risky Changes
+
+Bad: Refactor without rollback
+Good: Checkpoint before breaking changes
+
+## Automatic Tool Selection Workflow
+
+### Decision Matrix (Automatic, No User Input)
+
+```
+Task Type → Tool Sequence
+─────────────────────────
+"Find [symbol/text]" → Grep → Read
+"Find [pattern/concept]" → Explore (quick) → Agent (if broad)
+"Add [feature]" → Research patterns → Write/Edit → Lint check → Bash
+"Fix [bug]" → Grep/Explore (quick) → Read → Edit → Lint check → Bash
+"Refactor [X]" → Agent (Explore) → Checkpoint → Edit → Lint check → Bash
+"Test [feature]" → Read existing tests → Write tests → Bash → Lint check
+```
+
+### MCP Server Selection (Automatic)
+
+```
+User Request → MCP Server
+─────────────────────────
+"UI", "visual", "browser" → claude-in-chrome
+"PR", "issue", "github" → github
+"lint", "quality" → eslint
+"how to [library]", "[framework] setup" → context7
+```
+
+## Tool Escalation Protocol
+
+**Rule**: Start with Tier 1, escalate only if needed
+
+```
+Tier 1 (Try First):
+- Read: Know exact file path
+- Glob: Pattern matching
+- Grep: Exact text search
+
+If Tier 1 fails → Escalate to Tier 2:
+- Explore (quick): Conceptual search
+- Edit: Small edits
+- Write: New files
+
+If Tier 2 insufficient → Escalate to Tier 3:
+- Agent: Complex exploration
+- Bash: Run commands/tests
+- Lint check: Quality checks
+
+If Tier 3 inadequate → Escalate to Tier 4:
+- Parallel subagents: Multi-angle exploration
+- Browser MCP: Visual verification
+- Complex workflows: Multi-step automation
+```
+
+## Automatic Validation Rules
+
+**After EVERY Code Change**:
+1. Lint check on modified files
+2. Fix introduced lints immediately
+3. If tests exist → run relevant tests
+4. Update TodoWrite if tracking
+
+**Before EVERY Commit**:
+1. Run full test suite
+2. Run linter
+3. Run typecheck
+4. Create checkpoint if breaking change
+
+## Examples
+
+### Example: Automatic Tool Selection
+
+User: "Add authentication to checkout"
+
+Agent automatically selects:
+1. **Explore (quick)**: "How is authentication implemented?" (Tier 2)
+2. **Read**: `@src/auth/validateToken.ts` (Tier 1)
+3. **Edit**: Add auth to checkout (Tier 2)
+4. **Lint check**: Verify quality (Tier 3, automatic)
+5. **Bash**: Run auth tests (Tier 3, automatic)
+
+### Example: Automatic MCP Use
+
+User: "Fix issue #123"
+
+Agent automatically:
+1. **github**: Fetch issue #123
+2. **Grep**: Find related code
+3. **Edit**: Implement fix
+4. **eslint**: Check quality
+5. **github**: Create PR linking issue
+
+---
+
+## Troubleshooting
+
+### Tool Not Available
+
+**Problem**: Selected tool not accessible
+
+**Solutions**:
+1. Check MCP server running
+2. Use alternative tool
+3. Fallback to manual approach
+
+### Tool Taking Too Long
+
+**Problem**: Tool execution slow
+
+**Solutions**:
+1. Use model="haiku" for subagents
+2. Narrow scope (target_directories)
+3. Try cheaper alternative
+4. Time-box execution
+
+### Tool Failing Repeatedly
+
+**Problem**: Tool errors persist
+
+**Solutions**:
+1. Check parameters
+2. Verify permissions
+3. Try alternative approach
+4. Report blocker