claudify-agent 0.0.0-stage → 1.0.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/.claude/QUICK-REFERENCE.md +213 -0
- package/.claude/cost-dashboard.md +162 -0
- package/.claude/docs/COST-OPTIMIZATION.md +403 -0
- package/.claude/docs/MCP-INTEGRATION-GUIDE.md +348 -0
- package/.claude/docs/PLAN-MODE-OPTIMIZATION.md +836 -0
- package/.claude/hooks/auto-learning-review.ts +195 -0
- package/.claude/hooks/auto-lint-fix.ts +104 -0
- package/.claude/hooks/auto-security-review.ts +354 -0
- package/.claude/hooks/auto-validate.ts +348 -0
- package/.claude/hooks/plan-quality-tracker.ts +719 -0
- package/.claude/rules/anti-patterns.md +22 -0
- package/.claude/rules/context-tier-1.md +41 -0
- package/.claude/rules/context-tier-2.md +285 -0
- package/.claude/rules/general.md +25 -0
- package/.claude/rules/mcp-auto-use.md +46 -0
- package/.claude/rules/parallel-exploration-auto.md +31 -0
- package/.claude/rules/plan-mode-execution.md +289 -0
- package/.claude/rules/plan-mode-research.md +34 -0
- package/.claude/rules/plan-mode-structure.md +166 -0
- package/.claude/rules/plan-mode-validation.md +130 -0
- package/.claude/rules/security-critical.md +19 -0
- package/.claude/rules/tool-auto-selection.md +45 -0
- package/.claude/rules/tool-strategy.md +22 -0
- package/.claude/scripts/auto-validate.js +69 -0
- package/.claude/scripts/security-scan.js +45 -0
- package/.claude/security-dashboard.md +142 -0
- package/.claude/skills/backend-concurrency/SKILL.md +203 -0
- package/.claude/skills/debug-optimizer/SKILL.md +399 -0
- package/.claude/skills/debug-optimizer.md +12 -0
- package/.claude/skills/golang-guide/SKILL.md +177 -0
- package/.claude/skills/learning-loop/SKILL.md +308 -0
- package/.claude/skills/mcp-mastery/SKILL.md +214 -0
- package/.claude/skills/nestjs-guide/SKILL.md +197 -0
- package/.claude/skills/nextjs-guide/SKILL.md +687 -0
- package/.claude/skills/nextjs.md +13 -0
- package/.claude/skills/parallel-exploration/SKILL.md +193 -0
- package/.claude/skills/plan-mode-mastery/SKILL.md +263 -0
- package/.claude/skills/python-guide/SKILL.md +822 -0
- package/.claude/skills/react-guide/SKILL.md +762 -0
- package/.claude/skills/react.md +12 -0
- package/.claude/skills/security.md +18 -0
- package/.claude/skills/solidity-guide/SKILL.md +32 -0
- package/.claude/skills/tool-selection/SKILL.md +428 -0
- package/.claude/skills/vite-guide/SKILL.md +445 -0
- package/CLAUDE.md +49 -0
- package/README.md +65 -2
- package/bin/cli.js +50 -0
- package/package.json +44 -4
|
@@ -0,0 +1,193 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# SKILL.md: Parallel Exploration
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Description
|
|
4
|
+
Automatically launch multiple subagents in parallel for broad codebase exploration, reducing discovery time by 60-70%.
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
## When to Use
|
|
7
|
+
- Complex feature implementation (>5 files)
|
|
8
|
+
- Large refactors
|
|
9
|
+
- Bug investigation (root cause unknown)
|
|
10
|
+
- New codebase unfamiliarity
|
|
11
|
+
- Multi-part tasks
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
## Automatic Triggers
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
**Launch parallel subagents when**:
|
|
16
|
+
- User request mentions >3 different areas
|
|
17
|
+
- Task complexity: High (requires >10 steps)
|
|
18
|
+
- Codebase unfamiliarity detected
|
|
19
|
+
- Investigation phase taking >5 minutes
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
## Parallel Exploration Patterns
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
### Pattern 1: Feature Implementation
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
```
|
|
26
|
+
User: "Add user dashboard"
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
Parallel Subagents (model="fast", run_in_background=true):
|
|
29
|
+
1. "Find dashboard-like pages and layouts"
|
|
30
|
+
2. "Find API route patterns for data fetching"
|
|
31
|
+
3. "Find component structures for widgets"
|
|
32
|
+
4. "Find existing chart/visualization libraries"
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
Duration: 60s parallel (vs 240s sequential)
|
|
35
|
+
Output: Consolidated findings → Plan creation
|
|
36
|
+
```
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
### Pattern 2: Bug Investigation
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
```
|
|
41
|
+
User: "Checkout randomly fails"
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
Parallel Subagents:
|
|
44
|
+
1. "Find checkout flow code (UI → API → DB)"
|
|
45
|
+
2. "Find error handling in payment processing"
|
|
46
|
+
3. "Find recent changes to checkout files"
|
|
47
|
+
4. "Find similar issues/fixes in codebase"
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
Duration: 90s parallel
|
|
50
|
+
Output: Root cause hypothesis + fix locations
|
|
51
|
+
```
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
### Pattern 3: Large Refactor
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
```
|
|
56
|
+
User: "Migrate from JWT to sessions"
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
Parallel Subagents:
|
|
59
|
+
1. "Find all JWT validation code"
|
|
60
|
+
2. "Find all token generation code"
|
|
61
|
+
3. "Find all authentication middleware"
|
|
62
|
+
4. "Find all tests using JWT"
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
Duration: 120s parallel
|
|
65
|
+
Output: Complete migration map + risk assessment
|
|
66
|
+
```
|
|
67
|
+
|
|
68
|
+
## Subagent Configuration
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
```typescript
|
|
71
|
+
// Optimal configuration for parallel exploration
|
|
72
|
+
Task:
|
|
73
|
+
description="Explore [specific area]"
|
|
74
|
+
prompt="Find [specific pattern/code] in [target directory]"
|
|
75
|
+
subagent_type="explore"
|
|
76
|
+
model="fast" // Cost optimization
|
|
77
|
+
readonly=true // Safety
|
|
78
|
+
run_in_background=true // Non-blocking
|
|
79
|
+
```
|
|
80
|
+
|
|
81
|
+
## Cost Optimization
|
|
82
|
+
|
|
83
|
+
**Subagent Cost Hierarchy**:
|
|
84
|
+
```
|
|
85
|
+
explore (fast model): $ (Use for discovery)
|
|
86
|
+
generalPurpose (fast): $$ (Use for analysis)
|
|
87
|
+
generalPurpose (capable): $$$ (Use for complex reasoning)
|
|
88
|
+
browser-use: $$$$ (Use only when browser needed)
|
|
89
|
+
```
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
**Mandatory Cost Rules**:
|
|
92
|
+
1. **ALWAYS** use `model="fast"` for exploration subagents (90% of cases)
|
|
93
|
+
2. **ONLY** use capable model for:
|
|
94
|
+
- Complex reasoning tasks
|
|
95
|
+
- Multi-step analysis
|
|
96
|
+
- Security-critical reviews
|
|
97
|
+
3. **DOCUMENT** model choice in plan (justify if not "fast")
|
|
98
|
+
4. Use `readonly=true` unless modification needed
|
|
99
|
+
5. Use `run_in_background=true` for non-blocking
|
|
100
|
+
6. Limit to 4 parallel subagents max (diminishing returns)
|
|
101
|
+
7. Time-box to 120s max per subagent
|
|
102
|
+
|
|
103
|
+
**Cost Impact**: Using `model="fast"` reduces exploration costs by 50-70%
|
|
104
|
+
|
|
105
|
+
## Consolidation Strategy
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
**After parallel exploration completes**:
|
|
108
|
+
|
|
109
|
+
1. **Aggregate findings** from all subagents
|
|
110
|
+
2. **Identify overlaps** (multiple agents found same thing)
|
|
111
|
+
3. **Resolve conflicts** (contradictory findings)
|
|
112
|
+
4. **Create unified map** of codebase areas
|
|
113
|
+
5. **Generate plan** using consolidated knowledge
|
|
114
|
+
|
|
115
|
+
**Example Consolidation**:
|
|
116
|
+
```markdown
|
|
117
|
+
## Exploration Results (4 subagents, 60s parallel)
|
|
118
|
+
|
|
119
|
+
### Consensus Findings (found by multiple agents)
|
|
120
|
+
- Page structure: `app/[feature]/page.tsx` pattern
|
|
121
|
+
- API routes: `app/api/[resource]/route.ts`
|
|
122
|
+
- Components: `components/[feature]/` directory
|
|
123
|
+
|
|
124
|
+
### Unique Findings
|
|
125
|
+
- Agent 1: Found layout pattern in `app/layout.tsx`
|
|
126
|
+
- Agent 2: Found data fetching in `lib/fetcher.ts`
|
|
127
|
+
- Agent 3: Found component examples in `components/`
|
|
128
|
+
- Agent 4: Found chart library: Recharts in use
|
|
129
|
+
|
|
130
|
+
### Next Steps
|
|
131
|
+
- Follow `@app/profile/page.tsx` for page structure
|
|
132
|
+
- Use `@lib/fetcher.ts` for API calls
|
|
133
|
+
- Reference `@components/Card.tsx` for component pattern
|
|
134
|
+
```
|
|
135
|
+
|
|
136
|
+
## Examples
|
|
137
|
+
|
|
138
|
+
### Example 1: New Feature
|
|
139
|
+
|
|
140
|
+
User: "Add activity feed to user profile"
|
|
141
|
+
|
|
142
|
+
Automatic parallel exploration:
|
|
143
|
+
```
|
|
144
|
+
Subagent 1: "Find profile page structure"
|
|
145
|
+
Subagent 2: "Find feed/activity patterns"
|
|
146
|
+
Subagent 3: "Find API patterns for real-time data"
|
|
147
|
+
Subagent 4: "Find websocket/pubsub usage"
|
|
148
|
+
|
|
149
|
+
Result: Complete implementation map in 60s
|
|
150
|
+
```
|
|
151
|
+
|
|
152
|
+
### Example 2: Complex Bug
|
|
153
|
+
|
|
154
|
+
User: "User sessions expire prematurely"
|
|
155
|
+
|
|
156
|
+
Automatic parallel exploration:
|
|
157
|
+
```
|
|
158
|
+
Subagent 1: "Find session management code"
|
|
159
|
+
Subagent 2: "Find session expiration logic"
|
|
160
|
+
Subagent 3: "Find recent changes to auth files"
|
|
161
|
+
Subagent 4: "Find session-related tests"
|
|
162
|
+
|
|
163
|
+
Result: Root cause identified in 90s
|
|
164
|
+
```
|
|
165
|
+
|
|
166
|
+
### Example 3: Large Refactor
|
|
167
|
+
|
|
168
|
+
User: "Migrate from REST to GraphQL"
|
|
169
|
+
|
|
170
|
+
Automatic parallel exploration:
|
|
171
|
+
```
|
|
172
|
+
Subagent 1: "Find all REST API calls"
|
|
173
|
+
Subagent 2: "Find data fetching patterns"
|
|
174
|
+
Subagent 3: "Find existing GraphQL usage"
|
|
175
|
+
Subagent 4: "Find mutation operations"
|
|
176
|
+
|
|
177
|
+
Result: Complete migration strategy in 120s
|
|
178
|
+
```
|
|
179
|
+
|
|
180
|
+
## Anti-Patterns
|
|
181
|
+
|
|
182
|
+
❌ **Don't**:
|
|
183
|
+
- Launch >4 parallel subagents (chaos)
|
|
184
|
+
- Use capable model for simple exploration (waste)
|
|
185
|
+
- Run subagents sequentially (defeats purpose)
|
|
186
|
+
- Forget to consolidate findings (confusion)
|
|
187
|
+
|
|
188
|
+
✅ **Do**:
|
|
189
|
+
- Use `model="fast"` for exploration
|
|
190
|
+
- Launch 2-4 subagents in parallel
|
|
191
|
+
- Time-box to 120s max
|
|
192
|
+
- Consolidate findings before planning
|
|
193
|
+
- Reference specific files found
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,263 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# SKILL.md: Plan Mode Mastery
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Description
|
|
4
|
+
Comprehensive plan mode workflow with automatic research, validation, and execution monitoring.
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
## When to Use
|
|
7
|
+
- User requests Plan Mode
|
|
8
|
+
- Large feature implementation
|
|
9
|
+
- Complex refactoring
|
|
10
|
+
- Ambiguous requirements
|
|
11
|
+
- Multi-step tasks
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
## Capabilities
|
|
14
|
+
- Automatic pre-plan research
|
|
15
|
+
- Tool-aware plan creation
|
|
16
|
+
- Feasibility validation
|
|
17
|
+
- Progress monitoring
|
|
18
|
+
- Adaptive re-planning
|
|
19
|
+
- Iteration loops
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
## Commands
|
|
22
|
+
/plan-mode-full: Complete optimized workflow
|
|
23
|
+
/plan-mode-quick: Standard plan mode (no research)
|
|
24
|
+
/plan-mode-validate: Validate existing plan
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
## Workflows
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
### Full Plan Mode Workflow
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
1. **Pre-Plan Research** (2-3 minutes)
|
|
31
|
+
- SemanticSearch for patterns
|
|
32
|
+
- Parallel subagent exploration
|
|
33
|
+
- ReadLints check
|
|
34
|
+
- AskQuestion (batch) if needed
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
2. **Plan Creation** (1-2 minutes)
|
|
37
|
+
- Enhanced structure with tools
|
|
38
|
+
- Risk assessment
|
|
39
|
+
- Checkpoint strategy
|
|
40
|
+
- Time estimation
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
3. **Plan Validation** (1 minute)
|
|
43
|
+
- Feasibility subagent
|
|
44
|
+
- Tool availability check
|
|
45
|
+
- Dependency analysis
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
4. **Execution Monitoring**
|
|
48
|
+
- TodoWrite tracking
|
|
49
|
+
- Automatic checkpoints
|
|
50
|
+
- Iteration loops
|
|
51
|
+
- Adaptive re-planning
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
## Tool Integration
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
### Research Phase Tools
|
|
56
|
+
- **SemanticSearch**: Find existing patterns
|
|
57
|
+
- **Task (explore)**: Parallel codebase exploration
|
|
58
|
+
- **ReadLints**: Check code health
|
|
59
|
+
- **AskQuestion**: Batch clarifications
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
### Planning Phase Tools
|
|
62
|
+
- **CreatePlan**: Structured plan creation
|
|
63
|
+
- **TodoWrite**: Progress tracking setup
|
|
64
|
+
- **Checkpoints**: Strategic rollback points
|
|
65
|
+
|
|
66
|
+
### Execution Phase Tools
|
|
67
|
+
- **Read/Write/StrReplace**: Implementation
|
|
68
|
+
- **Shell**: Run tests and commands
|
|
69
|
+
- **ReadLints**: Quality validation
|
|
70
|
+
- **Task (subagents)**: Parallel work
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
### Monitoring Tools
|
|
73
|
+
- **TodoWrite**: Real-time progress
|
|
74
|
+
- **/grind**: Iteration loops
|
|
75
|
+
- **AskQuestion**: Blocker resolution
|
|
76
|
+
|
|
77
|
+
## Examples
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
### Example 1: Feature Implementation
|
|
80
|
+
|
|
81
|
+
User: "Add user dashboard"
|
|
82
|
+
|
|
83
|
+
Agent invokes /plan-mode-full:
|
|
84
|
+
|
|
85
|
+
**Research Phase**:
|
|
86
|
+
- SemanticSearch: "How are pages structured?"
|
|
87
|
+
- Task (parallel):
|
|
88
|
+
- "Find dashboard-like features"
|
|
89
|
+
- "Find API route patterns"
|
|
90
|
+
- "Find component patterns"
|
|
91
|
+
- ReadLints: Check current health
|
|
92
|
+
- AskQuestion: "Which widgets for MVP?" (batched)
|
|
93
|
+
|
|
94
|
+
**Plan Phase**:
|
|
95
|
+
Creates enhanced plan with:
|
|
96
|
+
- Files to create/modify with patterns
|
|
97
|
+
- Tool strategy for each step
|
|
98
|
+
- Risk mitigation (checkpoint before API changes)
|
|
99
|
+
- Time estimate: 45 minutes
|
|
100
|
+
|
|
101
|
+
**Validation Phase**:
|
|
102
|
+
- Task: "Validate plan feasibility"
|
|
103
|
+
- Check: All files accessible
|
|
104
|
+
- Verify: Tool availability
|
|
105
|
+
- Result: PASS
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
**Execution Phase**:
|
|
108
|
+
- TodoWrite: Track 7 steps
|
|
109
|
+
- Checkpoint: Before API changes
|
|
110
|
+
- /grind loop: Fix test failures
|
|
111
|
+
- Progress updates: After each step
|
|
112
|
+
|
|
113
|
+
### Example 2: Complex Refactor
|
|
114
|
+
|
|
115
|
+
User: "Refactor authentication system"
|
|
116
|
+
|
|
117
|
+
**Research Phase**:
|
|
118
|
+
- SemanticSearch: "How is auth implemented?"
|
|
119
|
+
- Task (parallel x4):
|
|
120
|
+
- "Find JWT validation logic"
|
|
121
|
+
- "Find session management"
|
|
122
|
+
- "Find OAuth integrations"
|
|
123
|
+
- "Find password hashing"
|
|
124
|
+
- ReadLints: Check all auth files
|
|
125
|
+
- AskQuestion: "Target auth method?"
|
|
126
|
+
|
|
127
|
+
**Plan Phase**:
|
|
128
|
+
- Summary: Migrate from JWT to sessions
|
|
129
|
+
- Files: 8 files to modify
|
|
130
|
+
- Steps: 12 steps with checkpoints
|
|
131
|
+
- Risks: Breaking change, data migration
|
|
132
|
+
- Time: 3 hours
|
|
133
|
+
|
|
134
|
+
**Validation Phase**:
|
|
135
|
+
- Task: Validate complexity
|
|
136
|
+
- Warning: High risk, suggest phased approach
|
|
137
|
+
- Result: PASS with warnings
|
|
138
|
+
|
|
139
|
+
**Execution Phase**:
|
|
140
|
+
- TodoWrite: 12 steps tracked
|
|
141
|
+
- Checkpoints: 3 (before breaking changes)
|
|
142
|
+
- Adaptive re-plan: Discovered legacy code
|
|
143
|
+
- /grind: Fixed auth edge cases
|
|
144
|
+
|
|
145
|
+
### Example 3: Bug Fix
|
|
146
|
+
|
|
147
|
+
User: "Fix authentication bug #123"
|
|
148
|
+
|
|
149
|
+
**Research Phase**:
|
|
150
|
+
- SemanticSearch: "How does auth flow work?"
|
|
151
|
+
- Task: "Investigate bug #123"
|
|
152
|
+
- ReadLints: Check auth files
|
|
153
|
+
- Result: Token expiration issue found
|
|
154
|
+
|
|
155
|
+
**Plan Phase**:
|
|
156
|
+
- Summary: Fix JWT expiration handling
|
|
157
|
+
- Files: 2 files to modify
|
|
158
|
+
- Steps: 4 steps
|
|
159
|
+
- Time: 20 minutes
|
|
160
|
+
|
|
161
|
+
**Validation Phase**:
|
|
162
|
+
- Quick validation (simple fix)
|
|
163
|
+
- Result: PASS
|
|
164
|
+
|
|
165
|
+
**Execution Phase**:
|
|
166
|
+
- TodoWrite: 4 steps
|
|
167
|
+
- StrReplace: Fix expiration logic
|
|
168
|
+
- Shell: Run auth tests
|
|
169
|
+
- ReadLints: Verify quality
|
|
170
|
+
- Complete: Bug fixed
|
|
171
|
+
|
|
172
|
+
## Best Practices
|
|
173
|
+
|
|
174
|
+
### 1. Always Research First
|
|
175
|
+
- Never plan blind
|
|
176
|
+
- Spend 2-3 min on research
|
|
177
|
+
- Find patterns before coding
|
|
178
|
+
- Ask questions in batches
|
|
179
|
+
|
|
180
|
+
### 2. Validate Before Presenting
|
|
181
|
+
- Use validation subagent
|
|
182
|
+
- Check file accessibility
|
|
183
|
+
- Verify time estimates
|
|
184
|
+
- Flag risks explicitly
|
|
185
|
+
|
|
186
|
+
### 3. Track Progress Religiously
|
|
187
|
+
- Update todos immediately
|
|
188
|
+
- One task in_progress at a time
|
|
189
|
+
- Create checkpoints strategically
|
|
190
|
+
- Report blockers early
|
|
191
|
+
|
|
192
|
+
### 4. Iterate When Stuck
|
|
193
|
+
- Use /grind for tests (max 5 iterations)
|
|
194
|
+
- Update scratchpad
|
|
195
|
+
- AskQuestion if blocked
|
|
196
|
+
- Re-plan if >30% deviation
|
|
197
|
+
|
|
198
|
+
### 5. Time-Box Research
|
|
199
|
+
- Max 3 minutes for research
|
|
200
|
+
- "Good enough" threshold
|
|
201
|
+
- Progressive disclosure
|
|
202
|
+
- Optimize for speed
|
|
203
|
+
|
|
204
|
+
## Anti-Patterns
|
|
205
|
+
|
|
206
|
+
### ❌ Planning Without Research
|
|
207
|
+
Bad: "I'll create a plan immediately"
|
|
208
|
+
Good: "Let me research existing patterns first"
|
|
209
|
+
|
|
210
|
+
### ❌ Vague Plans
|
|
211
|
+
Bad: "Implement authentication"
|
|
212
|
+
Good: "Add JWT validation to /api/login following @src/auth/validateToken.ts pattern"
|
|
213
|
+
|
|
214
|
+
### ❌ No Validation
|
|
215
|
+
Bad: Present plan without checking
|
|
216
|
+
Good: Validate feasibility before presenting
|
|
217
|
+
|
|
218
|
+
### ❌ Skipping Progress Tracking
|
|
219
|
+
Bad: Work without updating todos
|
|
220
|
+
Good: Update TodoWrite after each step
|
|
221
|
+
|
|
222
|
+
### ❌ No Checkpoints
|
|
223
|
+
Bad: Risky changes without rollback
|
|
224
|
+
Good: Checkpoint before breaking changes
|
|
225
|
+
|
|
226
|
+
## Troubleshooting
|
|
227
|
+
|
|
228
|
+
### Research Taking Too Long
|
|
229
|
+
**Problem**: >5 minutes in research phase
|
|
230
|
+
|
|
231
|
+
**Solutions**:
|
|
232
|
+
- Time-box to 3 minutes max
|
|
233
|
+
- Use model="fast" for subagents
|
|
234
|
+
- Narrow target_directories
|
|
235
|
+
- Accept "good enough" patterns
|
|
236
|
+
|
|
237
|
+
### Validation Failing Repeatedly
|
|
238
|
+
**Problem**: Plan fails validation multiple times
|
|
239
|
+
|
|
240
|
+
**Solutions**:
|
|
241
|
+
- Simplify the plan
|
|
242
|
+
- Break into smaller phases
|
|
243
|
+
- Add more fallback strategies
|
|
244
|
+
- Revise time estimates
|
|
245
|
+
|
|
246
|
+
### Tests Not Passing
|
|
247
|
+
**Problem**: /grind loop failing after 5 iterations
|
|
248
|
+
|
|
249
|
+
**Solutions**:
|
|
250
|
+
- Report BLOCKED with details
|
|
251
|
+
- AskQuestion for guidance
|
|
252
|
+
- Re-plan approach
|
|
253
|
+
- Check for missing dependencies
|
|
254
|
+
|
|
255
|
+
### Plan Deviation
|
|
256
|
+
**Problem**: Execution diverging >30% from plan
|
|
257
|
+
|
|
258
|
+
**Solutions**:
|
|
259
|
+
- Pause immediately
|
|
260
|
+
- Create checkpoint
|
|
261
|
+
- Assess what changed
|
|
262
|
+
- Present updated plan
|
|
263
|
+
- Get approval before continuing
|