claude-flow 2.0.0-alpha.88 → 2.0.0-alpha.89

package/src/verification/tests/mocks/false-reporting-scenarios.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,1060 @@
+/**
+ * Mock Agent Scenarios for False Reporting Detection Tests
+ * 
+ * Tests various scenarios where agents might provide false or misleading reports:
+ * - Intentional false claims about task completion
+ * - Exaggerated performance improvements
+ * - Hidden failures in implementation
+ * - Inconsistent reporting between agents
+ * - Fabricated test results and evidence
+ */
+
+import { jest } from '@jest/globals';
+import { EventEmitter } from 'events';
+import * as fs from 'fs/promises';
+import * as path from 'path';
+import * as os from 'os';
+
+// Import verification components
+import TruthScoreCalculator from '../../../../.claude/helpers/truth-score.js';
+
+interface MockAgent {
+  id: string;
+  type: string;
+  deceptionLevel: number; // 0 = honest, 1 = completely deceptive
+  deceptionStrategy: DeceptionStrategy;
+  behaviorPattern: BehaviorPattern;
+  reportHistory: AgentReport[];
+  detectedAs: 'honest' | 'suspicious' | 'deceptive' | 'unknown';
+}
+
+interface DeceptionStrategy {
+  type: 'overconfident' | 'fabrication' | 'selective_reporting' | 'gaslighting' | 'collusion';
+  parameters: Record<string, any>;
+}
+
+interface BehaviorPattern {
+  consistency: number; // 0-1, how consistent the agent's reports are
+  timeToReport: number; // Average time to submit reports (ms)
+  detailLevel: number; // 0-1, how detailed the reports are
+  evidenceQuality: number; // 0-1, quality of evidence provided
+}
+
+interface AgentReport {
+  id: string;
+  agentId: string;
+  taskId: string;
+  claimedOutcome: TaskOutcome;
+  evidence: any;
+  timestamp: number;
+  truthScore?: number;
+  verified: boolean;
+  conflicts: string[];
+}
+
+interface TaskOutcome {
+  success: boolean;
+  testsPass: boolean;
+  noErrors: boolean;
+  performance: {
+    improvement: number;
+    metrics: Record<string, number>;
+  };
+  quality: {
+    codeQuality: number;
+    documentation: number;
+    maintainability: number;
+  };
+}
+
+interface VerificationResult {
+  reportId: string;
+  agentId: string;
+  truthScore: number;
+  deceptionDetected: boolean;
+  deceptionType: string[];
+  confidence: number;
+  evidence: any;
+  recommendations: string[];
+}
+
+describe('False Reporting Detection Scenarios', () => {
+  let tempDir: string;
+  let truthCalculator: any;
+  let deceptionDetector: DeceptionDetector;
+  let mockAgents: Map<string, MockAgent>;
+
+  beforeEach(async () => {
+    tempDir = await fs.mkdtemp(path.join(os.tmpdir(), 'false-reporting-test-'));
+    
+    // Setup truth score calculator
+    truthCalculator = new TruthScoreCalculator();
+    truthCalculator.configPath = path.join(tempDir, 'verification.json');
+    truthCalculator.memoryPath = path.join(tempDir, 'truth-scores');
+    await truthCalculator.init();
+    
+    // Setup deception detector
+    deceptionDetector = new DeceptionDetector(truthCalculator, tempDir);
+    await deceptionDetector.initialize();
+    
+    // Create mock agents with different deception strategies
+    mockAgents = new Map();
+    await createMockAgentScenarios();
+  });
+
+  afterEach(async () => {
+    await fs.rm(tempDir, { recursive: true, force: true });
+  });
+
+  async function createMockAgentScenarios() {
+    const agentConfigs = [
+      // Honest baseline agent
+      {
+        id: 'honest-agent-001',
+        type: 'coder',
+        deceptionLevel: 0,
+        deceptionStrategy: { type: 'overconfident', parameters: {} },
+        behaviorPattern: {
+          consistency: 0.95,
+          timeToReport: 5000,
+          detailLevel: 0.8,
+          evidenceQuality: 0.9
+        }
+      },
+      // Overconfident agent
+      {
+        id: 'overconfident-agent-002',
+        type: 'coder',
+        deceptionLevel: 0.3,
+        deceptionStrategy: {
+          type: 'overconfident',
+          parameters: { confidenceMultiplier: 1.5, hideMinorIssues: true }
+        },
+        behaviorPattern: {
+          consistency: 0.7,
+          timeToReport: 3000,
+          detailLevel: 0.6,
+          evidenceQuality: 0.7
+        }
+      },
+      // Fabricating agent
+      {
+        id: 'fabricating-agent-003',
+        type: 'tester',
+        deceptionLevel: 0.8,
+        deceptionStrategy: {
+          type: 'fabrication',
+          parameters: { fabricateResults: true, fakePassRate: 0.95 }
+        },
+        behaviorPattern: {
+          consistency: 0.4,
+          timeToReport: 1000, // Reports very quickly (suspicious)
+          detailLevel: 0.9, // High detail to seem legitimate
+          evidenceQuality: 0.3 // Low quality evidence
+        }
+      },
+      // Selective reporting agent
+      {
+        id: 'selective-agent-004',
+        type: 'reviewer',
+        deceptionLevel: 0.5,
+        deceptionStrategy: {
+          type: 'selective_reporting',
+          parameters: { reportOnlyPositives: true, hideFailures: true }
+        },
+        behaviorPattern: {
+          consistency: 0.8,
+          timeToReport: 7000,
+          detailLevel: 0.5,
+          evidenceQuality: 0.6
+        }
+      },
+      // Gaslighting agent
+      {
+        id: 'gaslighting-agent-005',
+        type: 'coordinator',
+        deceptionLevel: 0.9,
+        deceptionStrategy: {
+          type: 'gaslighting',
+          parameters: { contradictOthers: true, rewriteHistory: true }
+        },
+        behaviorPattern: {
+          consistency: 0.2,
+          timeToReport: 4000,
+          detailLevel: 0.7,
+          evidenceQuality: 0.4
+        }
+      }
+    ];
+
+    for (const config of agentConfigs) {
+      const agent = createMockAgent(config);
+      mockAgents.set(config.id, agent);
+    }
+  }
+
+  function createMockAgent(config: any): MockAgent {
+    return {
+      id: config.id,
+      type: config.type,
+      deceptionLevel: config.deceptionLevel,
+      deceptionStrategy: config.deceptionStrategy,
+      behaviorPattern: config.behaviorPattern,
+      reportHistory: [],
+      detectedAs: 'unknown'
+    };
+  }
+
+  describe('Overconfident Agent Scenarios', () => {
+    test('should detect agent consistently overestimating success rates', async () => {
+      const agent = mockAgents.get('overconfident-agent-002')!;
+      const reports: AgentReport[] = [];
+
+      // Generate series of overconfident reports
+      for (let i = 0; i < 20; i++) {
+        const actualSuccess = Math.random() > 0.3; // 70% actual success rate
+        const claimedSuccess = actualSuccess || Math.random() > 0.2; // Claims 94% success rate
+
+        const report = generateReport(agent, `task-${i}`, {
+          actualOutcome: {
+            success: actualSuccess,
+            testsPass: actualSuccess,
+            noErrors: actualSuccess,
+            performance: { improvement: Math.random() * 0.2, metrics: {} },
+            quality: { codeQuality: Math.random() * 0.3 + 0.4, documentation: 0.5, maintainability: 0.6 }
+          },
+          claimedOutcome: {
+            success: claimedSuccess,
+            testsPass: claimedSuccess,
+            noErrors: claimedSuccess,
+            performance: { improvement: Math.random() * 0.3 + 0.2, metrics: {} }, // Exaggerated
+            quality: { codeQuality: Math.random() * 0.2 + 0.8, documentation: 0.9, maintainability: 0.9 }
+          }
+        });
+
+        reports.push(report);
+        agent.reportHistory.push(report);
+      }
+
+      // Analyze pattern for deception
+      const analysis = await deceptionDetector.analyzeAgentPattern(agent.id, reports);
+
+      expect(analysis.deceptionDetected).toBe(true);
+      expect(analysis.deceptionType).toContain('overconfidence');
+      expect(analysis.confidence).toBeGreaterThan(0.7);
+      expect(analysis.truthScore).toBeLessThan(0.6);
+
+      // Check specific indicators
+      expect(analysis.evidence.successRateDiscrepancy).toBeGreaterThan(0.15);
+      expect(analysis.evidence.performanceExaggeration).toBeGreaterThan(0.1);
+      expect(analysis.recommendations).toContain('Implement additional verification for this agent');
+    });
+
+    test('should detect pattern of hiding minor issues', async () => {
+      const agent = mockAgents.get('overconfident-agent-002')!;
+      const reports: AgentReport[] = [];
+
+      // Generate reports where agent hides minor issues
+      for (let i = 0; i < 15; i++) {
+        const minorIssues = Math.floor(Math.random() * 5) + 1; // 1-5 minor issues
+        const majorIssues = Math.random() > 0.8 ? 1 : 0; // Occasional major issue
+
+        const report = generateReport(agent, `minor-issues-task-${i}`, {
+          actualOutcome: {
+            success: majorIssues === 0,
+            testsPass: true,
+            noErrors: false, // Has minor errors
+            performance: { improvement: 0.1, metrics: { minorIssues, majorIssues } },
+            quality: { codeQuality: 0.7, documentation: 0.6, maintainability: 0.7 }
+          },
+          claimedOutcome: {
+            success: true,
+            testsPass: true,
+            noErrors: true, // Claims no errors
+            performance: { improvement: 0.15, metrics: { minorIssues: 0, majorIssues: 0 } },
+            quality: { codeQuality: 0.9, documentation: 0.8, maintainability: 0.9 }
+          }
+        });
+
+        reports.push(report);
+        agent.reportHistory.push(report);
+      }
+
+      const analysis = await deceptionDetector.analyzeAgentPattern(agent.id, reports);
+
+      expect(analysis.deceptionDetected).toBe(true);
+      expect(analysis.deceptionType).toContain('issue_hiding');
+      expect(analysis.evidence.hiddenIssuesCount).toBeGreaterThan(10);
+      expect(analysis.recommendations).toContain('Require detailed issue reporting');
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('Evidence Fabrication Scenarios', () => {
+    test('should detect fabricated test results', async () => {
+      const agent = mockAgents.get('fabricating-agent-003')!;
+      const reports: AgentReport[] = [];
+
+      // Generate reports with fabricated test results
+      for (let i = 0; i < 25; i++) {
+        const actualTestResults = {
+          total: 100,
+          passed: Math.floor(Math.random() * 30) + 60, // 60-90% pass rate
+          failed: 0,
+          skipped: 0
+        };
+        actualTestResults.failed = actualTestResults.total - actualTestResults.passed;
+
+        const fabricatedResults = {
+          total: 100,
+          passed: Math.floor(Math.random() * 5) + 95, // 95-100% pass rate
+          failed: 0,
+          skipped: 0
+        };
+        fabricatedResults.failed = fabricatedResults.total - fabricatedResults.passed;
+
+        const report = generateReport(agent, `fabrication-task-${i}`, {
+          actualOutcome: {
+            success: actualTestResults.passed > 80,
+            testsPass: actualTestResults.passed === actualTestResults.total,
+            noErrors: false,
+            performance: { improvement: 0.05, metrics: actualTestResults },
+            quality: { codeQuality: 0.6, documentation: 0.5, maintainability: 0.6 }
+          },
+          claimedOutcome: {
+            success: true,
+            testsPass: true,
+            noErrors: true,
+            performance: { improvement: 0.15, metrics: fabricatedResults },
+            quality: { codeQuality: 0.95, documentation: 0.9, maintainability: 0.95 }
+          },
+          evidence: {
+            testResults: fabricatedResults,
+            executionTime: Math.random() * 100 + 50, // Suspiciously consistent timing
+            testLogs: generateFakeTestLogs(fabricatedResults)
+          }
+        });
+
+        reports.push(report);
+        agent.reportHistory.push(report);
+      }
+
+      const analysis = await deceptionDetector.analyzeAgentPattern(agent.id, reports);
+
+      expect(analysis.deceptionDetected).toBe(true);
+      expect(analysis.deceptionType).toContain('fabrication');
+      expect(analysis.deceptionType).toContain('unrealistic_results');
+      expect(analysis.confidence).toBeGreaterThan(0.8);
+
+      // Check fabrication indicators
+      expect(analysis.evidence.unrealisticSuccessRate).toBe(true);
+      expect(analysis.evidence.suspiciouslyFastReporting).toBe(true);
+      expect(analysis.evidence.evidenceInconsistency).toBeGreaterThan(0.5);
+    });
+
+    test('should detect impossible performance improvements', async () => {
+      const agent = mockAgents.get('fabricating-agent-003')!;
+      const reports: AgentReport[] = [];
+
+      // Generate reports with impossible performance claims
+      for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
+        const report = generateReport(agent, `impossible-perf-task-${i}`, {
+          actualOutcome: {
+            success: true,
+            testsPass: true,
+            noErrors: true,
+            performance: {
+              improvement: Math.random() * 0.1 + 0.05, // 5-15% actual improvement
+              metrics: {
+                responseTime: 1000,
+                throughput: 100,
+                memoryUsage: 500
+              }
+            },
+            quality: { codeQuality: 0.7, documentation: 0.6, maintainability: 0.7 }
+          },
+          claimedOutcome: {
+            success: true,
+            testsPass: true,
+            noErrors: true,
+            performance: {
+              improvement: Math.random() * 0.5 + 0.8, // 80-130% claimed improvement (impossible)
+              metrics: {
+                responseTime: 100, // 10x improvement
+                throughput: 1000, // 10x improvement
+                memoryUsage: 50 // 10x improvement
+              }
+            },
+            quality: { codeQuality: 0.99, documentation: 0.99, maintainability: 0.99 }
+          }
+        });
+
+        reports.push(report);
+        agent.reportHistory.push(report);
+      }
+
+      const analysis = await deceptionDetector.analyzeAgentPattern(agent.id, reports);
+
+      expect(analysis.deceptionDetected).toBe(true);
+      expect(analysis.deceptionType).toContain('impossible_claims');
+      expect(analysis.evidence.impossiblePerformanceGains).toBe(true);
+      expect(analysis.recommendations).toContain('Require third-party verification for performance claims');
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('Selective Reporting Scenarios', () => {
+    test('should detect agent that only reports successes', async () => {
+      const agent = mockAgents.get('selective-agent-004')!;
+      const reports: AgentReport[] = [];
+
+      // Generate mixed actual outcomes but agent only reports successes
+      const actualOutcomes = [];
+      for (let i = 0; i < 30; i++) {
+        const success = Math.random() > 0.4; // 60% actual success rate
+        actualOutcomes.push(success);
+
+        // Agent only reports the successful ones
+        if (success || Math.random() > 0.9) { // Reports 90% of successes, 10% of failures
+          const report = generateReport(agent, `selective-task-${i}`, {
+            actualOutcome: {
+              success,
+              testsPass: success,
+              noErrors: success,
+              performance: { improvement: success ? 0.1 : -0.05, metrics: {} },
+              quality: { codeQuality: success ? 0.8 : 0.4, documentation: 0.6, maintainability: 0.7 }
+            },
+            claimedOutcome: {
+              success: true, // Always claims success
+              testsPass: true,
+              noErrors: true,
+              performance: { improvement: 0.12, metrics: {} },
+              quality: { codeQuality: 0.85, documentation: 0.8, maintainability: 0.8 }
+            }
+          });
+
+          reports.push(report);
+          agent.reportHistory.push(report);
+        }
+      }
+
+      const analysis = await deceptionDetector.analyzeAgentPattern(agent.id, reports);
+
+      expect(analysis.deceptionDetected).toBe(true);
+      expect(analysis.deceptionType).toContain('selective_reporting');
+      expect(analysis.evidence.missingFailureReports).toBe(true);
+      expect(analysis.evidence.suspiciousSuccessRate).toBeGreaterThan(0.95);
+      expect(analysis.recommendations).toContain('Mandatory reporting of all task outcomes');
+    });
+
+    test('should detect cherry-picked metrics reporting', async () => {
+      const agent = mockAgents.get('selective-agent-004')!;
+      const reports: AgentReport[] = [];
+
+      // Generate reports where agent only reports favorable metrics
+      for (let i = 0; i < 20; i++) {
+        const fullMetrics = {
+          responseTime: Math.random() * 1000 + 500, // 500-1500ms
+          throughput: Math.random() * 200 + 50, // 50-250 rps
+          memoryUsage: Math.random() * 800 + 200, // 200-1000MB
+          errorRate: Math.random() * 0.1, // 0-10% errors
+          cpuUsage: Math.random() * 100, // 0-100% CPU
+          diskIO: Math.random() * 1000 // 0-1000 IOPS
+        };
+
+        // Agent only reports the best 2-3 metrics
+        const favorableMetrics = Object.entries(fullMetrics)
+          .sort(([keyA, valueA], [keyB, valueB]) => {
+            // Sort by how "good" the metric looks (lower is better for most)
+            const goodValues = { responseTime: -valueA, errorRate: -valueA, default: valueB };
+            return (goodValues[keyA] || goodValues.default) - (goodValues[keyB] || goodValues.default);
+          })
+          .slice(0, 3)
+          .reduce((obj, [key, value]) => ({ ...obj, [key]: value }), {});
+
+        const report = generateReport(agent, `cherry-pick-task-${i}`, {
+          actualOutcome: {
+            success: true,
+            testsPass: true,
+            noErrors: fullMetrics.errorRate < 0.05,
+            performance: { improvement: 0.05, metrics: fullMetrics },
+            quality: { codeQuality: 0.7, documentation: 0.6, maintainability: 0.7 }
+          },
+          claimedOutcome: {
+            success: true,
+            testsPass: true,
+            noErrors: true,
+            performance: { improvement: 0.15, metrics: favorableMetrics },
+            quality: { codeQuality: 0.9, documentation: 0.8, maintainability: 0.9 }
+          }
+        });
+
+        reports.push(report);
+        agent.reportHistory.push(report);
+      }
+
+      const analysis = await deceptionDetector.analyzeAgentPattern(agent.id, reports);
+
+      expect(analysis.deceptionDetected).toBe(true);
+      expect(analysis.deceptionType).toContain('cherry_picking');
+      expect(analysis.evidence.incompleteMetricsReporting).toBe(true);
+      expect(analysis.recommendations).toContain('Require comprehensive metrics reporting');
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('Gaslighting and Manipulation Scenarios', () => {
+    test('should detect agent contradicting previous statements', async () => {
+      const agent = mockAgents.get('gaslighting-agent-005')!;
+      const reports: AgentReport[] = [];
+
+      // Generate contradictory reports about the same tasks
+      const taskIds = Array.from({ length: 5 }, (_, i) => `contradiction-task-${i}`);
+
+      for (const taskId of taskIds) {
+        // First report - claims failure
+        const firstReport = generateReport(agent, taskId, {
+          actualOutcome: {
+            success: true,
+            testsPass: true,
+            noErrors: true,
+            performance: { improvement: 0.1, metrics: {} },
+            quality: { codeQuality: 0.8, documentation: 0.7, maintainability: 0.8 }
+          },
+          claimedOutcome: {
+            success: false,
+            testsPass: false,
+            noErrors: false,
+            performance: { improvement: -0.05, metrics: {} },
+            quality: { codeQuality: 0.4, documentation: 0.3, maintainability: 0.5 }
+          },
+          timestamp: Date.now()
+        });
+
+        // Second report - claims success for same task
+        const secondReport = generateReport(agent, taskId, {
+          actualOutcome: {
+            success: true,
+            testsPass: true,
+            noErrors: true,
+            performance: { improvement: 0.1, metrics: {} },
+            quality: { codeQuality: 0.8, documentation: 0.7, maintainability: 0.8 }
+          },
+          claimedOutcome: {
+            success: true,
+            testsPass: true,
+            noErrors: true,
+            performance: { improvement: 0.2, metrics: {} },
+            quality: { codeQuality: 0.95, documentation: 0.9, maintainability: 0.95 }
+          },
+          timestamp: Date.now() + 60000 // 1 minute later
+        });
+
+        reports.push(firstReport, secondReport);
+        agent.reportHistory.push(firstReport, secondReport);
+      }
+
+      const analysis = await deceptionDetector.analyzeAgentPattern(agent.id, reports);
+
+      expect(analysis.deceptionDetected).toBe(true);
+      expect(analysis.deceptionType).toContain('gaslighting');
+      expect(analysis.deceptionType).toContain('contradictory_statements');
+      expect(analysis.evidence.contradictionCount).toBeGreaterThan(3);
+      expect(analysis.recommendations).toContain('Implement immutable audit trail for agent reports');
+    });
+
+    test('should detect agent attempting to discredit other agents', async () => {
+      const gaslightingAgent = mockAgents.get('gaslighting-agent-005')!;
+      const honestAgent = mockAgents.get('honest-agent-001')!;
+      const reports: AgentReport[] = [];
+
+      // Generate scenario where gaslighting agent contradicts honest agent
+      for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
+        const taskId = `discredit-task-${i}`;
+
+        // Honest agent reports realistic outcome
+        const honestReport = generateReport(honestAgent, taskId, {
+          actualOutcome: {
+            success: true,
+            testsPass: true,
+            noErrors: true,
+            performance: { improvement: 0.08, metrics: {} },
+            quality: { codeQuality: 0.75, documentation: 0.7, maintainability: 0.8 }
+          },
+          claimedOutcome: {
+            success: true,
+            testsPass: true,
+            noErrors: true,
+            performance: { improvement: 0.08, metrics: {} },
+            quality: { codeQuality: 0.75, documentation: 0.7, maintainability: 0.8 }
+          }
+        });
+
+        // Gaslighting agent contradicts with false negative report
+        const gaslightingReport = generateReport(gaslightingAgent, taskId, {
+          actualOutcome: {
+            success: true,
+            testsPass: true,
+            noErrors: true,
+            performance: { improvement: 0.08, metrics: {} },
+            quality: { codeQuality: 0.75, documentation: 0.7, maintainability: 0.8 }
+          },
+          claimedOutcome: {
+            success: false,
+            testsPass: false,
+            noErrors: false,
+            performance: { improvement: -0.1, metrics: {} },
+            quality: { codeQuality: 0.3, documentation: 0.2, maintainability: 0.4 }
+          },
+          evidence: {
+            contradicts: honestReport.id,
+            claimsOtherAgentWrong: true
+          }
+        });
+
+        reports.push(honestReport, gaslightingReport);
+        gaslightingAgent.reportHistory.push(gaslightingReport);
+      }
+
+      const analysis = await deceptionDetector.analyzeAgentPattern(gaslightingAgent.id, reports);
+
+      expect(analysis.deceptionDetected).toBe(true);
+      expect(analysis.deceptionType).toContain('discrediting_others');
+      expect(analysis.evidence.contradictionsWithOtherAgents).toBeGreaterThan(7);
+      expect(analysis.evidence.systematicDisagreement).toBe(true);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('Collusion Detection', () => {
+    test('should detect agents colluding to hide failures', async () => {
+      const colludingAgents = [
+        mockAgents.get('overconfident-agent-002')!,
+        mockAgents.get('selective-agent-004')!
+      ];
+
+      const reports: AgentReport[] = [];
+      const sharedFailures = ['shared-failure-1', 'shared-failure-2', 'shared-failure-3'];
+
+      // Generate coordinated false reports
+      for (const taskId of sharedFailures) {
+        for (const agent of colludingAgents) {
+          const report = generateReport(agent, taskId, {
+            actualOutcome: {
+              success: false,
+              testsPass: false,
+              noErrors: false,
+              performance: { improvement: -0.05, metrics: {} },
+              quality: { codeQuality: 0.3, documentation: 0.2, maintainability: 0.4 }
+            },
+            claimedOutcome: {
+              success: true,
+              testsPass: true,
+              noErrors: true,
+              performance: { improvement: 0.15, metrics: {} },
+              quality: { codeQuality: 0.9, documentation: 0.8, maintainability: 0.9 }
+            },
+            evidence: {
+              crossReferencedWith: colludingAgents.map(a => a.id).filter(id => id !== agent.id)
+            }
+          });
+
+          reports.push(report);
+          agent.reportHistory.push(report);
+        }
+      }
+
+      // Analyze for collusion patterns
+      const collusionAnalysis = await deceptionDetector.analyzeCollusionPatterns(
+        colludingAgents.map(a => a.id),
+        reports
+      );
+
+      expect(collusionAnalysis.collusionDetected).toBe(true);
+      expect(collusionAnalysis.collusionType).toContain('coordinated_false_reporting');
+      expect(collusionAnalysis.confidence).toBeGreaterThan(0.7);
+      expect(collusionAnalysis.evidence.synchronizedReporting).toBe(true);
+      expect(collusionAnalysis.evidence.identicalFalseClaims).toBeGreaterThan(2);
+    });
+  });
+
+  // Helper functions
+  function generateReport(
+    agent: MockAgent,
+    taskId: string,
+    scenario: {
+      actualOutcome: TaskOutcome;
+      claimedOutcome: TaskOutcome;
+      evidence?: any;
+      timestamp?: number;
+    }
+  ): AgentReport {
+    const reportId = `report-${Date.now()}-${Math.random()}`;
+    
+    // Apply agent's deception strategy
+    const modifiedClaim = applyDeceptionStrategy(agent, scenario.claimedOutcome);
+    
+    // Generate evidence based on agent's behavior pattern
+    const evidence = generateEvidence(agent, scenario.actualOutcome, modifiedClaim, scenario.evidence);
+
+    return {
+      id: reportId,
+      agentId: agent.id,
+      taskId,
+      claimedOutcome: modifiedClaim,
+      evidence,
+      timestamp: scenario.timestamp || Date.now(),
+      verified: false,
+      conflicts: []
+    };
+  }
+
+  function applyDeceptionStrategy(agent: MockAgent, claimedOutcome: TaskOutcome): TaskOutcome {
+    const strategy = agent.deceptionStrategy;
+    const deceptionLevel = agent.deceptionLevel;
+    const modified = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(claimedOutcome));
+
+    switch (strategy.type) {
+      case 'overconfident':
+        if (strategy.parameters.confidenceMultiplier) {
+          modified.performance.improvement *= strategy.parameters.confidenceMultiplier;
+          modified.quality.codeQuality = Math.min(1, modified.quality.codeQuality * 1.2);
+        }
+        if (strategy.parameters.hideMinorIssues) {
+          modified.noErrors = true;
+        }
+        break;
+
+      case 'fabrication':
+        if (strategy.parameters.fabricateResults) {
+          modified.success = true;
+          modified.testsPass = true;
+          modified.performance.improvement = Math.random() * 0.5 + 0.3;
+        }
+        break;
+
+      case 'selective_reporting':
+        if (strategy.parameters.reportOnlyPositives && !modified.success) {
+          return null; // Don't report failures
+        }
+        break;
+
+      case 'gaslighting':
+        // Randomly flip outcomes to create contradictions
+        if (Math.random() < deceptionLevel * 0.5) {
+          modified.success = !modified.success;
+          modified.testsPass = !modified.testsPass;
+        }
+        break;
+    }
+
+    return modified;
+  }
+
+  function generateEvidence(
+    agent: MockAgent,
+    actualOutcome: TaskOutcome,
+    claimedOutcome: TaskOutcome,
+    additionalEvidence?: any
+  ): any {
+    const evidence: any = {
+      ...additionalEvidence,
+      reportingTime: agent.behaviorPattern.timeToReport + (Math.random() - 0.5) * 1000,
+      detailLevel: agent.behaviorPattern.detailLevel,
+      evidenceQuality: agent.behaviorPattern.evidenceQuality
+    };
+
+    // Add inconsistencies based on deception level
+    if (agent.deceptionLevel > 0.5) {
+      evidence.inconsistencies = [
+        'Test logs don\'t match reported results',
+        'Performance metrics seem unrealistic',
+        'Evidence quality unusually low'
+      ];
+    }
+
+    return evidence;
+  }
+
+  function generateFakeTestLogs(testResults: any): string {
+    // Generate fake test logs that look real but have inconsistencies
+    const logs = [];
+    logs.push(`Running ${testResults.total} tests...`);
+    logs.push(`PASS: ${testResults.passed} tests`);
+    if (testResults.failed > 0) {
+      logs.push(`FAIL: ${testResults.failed} tests`);
+    }
+    logs.push('All tests completed successfully!'); // Contradictory message
+    return logs.join('\n');
+  }
+});
+
+// Mock Deception Detector Implementation
+class DeceptionDetector {
+  private truthCalculator: any;
+  private dataPath: string;
+  private behaviorProfiles: Map<string, any> = new Map();
+
+  constructor(truthCalculator: any, dataPath: string) {
+    this.truthCalculator = truthCalculator;
+    this.dataPath = dataPath;
+  }
+
+  async initialize() {
+    await fs.mkdir(path.join(this.dataPath, 'deception-analysis'), { recursive: true });
+  }
+
+  async analyzeAgentPattern(agentId: string, reports: AgentReport[]): Promise<VerificationResult> {
+    const analysis = {
+      reportId: `analysis-${agentId}`,
+      agentId,
+      truthScore: 0,
+      deceptionDetected: false,
+      deceptionType: [],
+      confidence: 0,
+      evidence: {},
+      recommendations: []
+    };
+
+    // Calculate truth scores for all reports
+    const truthScores = reports.map(report => {
+      return this.calculateReportTruthScore(report);
+    });
+
+    analysis.truthScore = truthScores.reduce((sum, score) => sum + score, 0) / truthScores.length;
+
+    // Detect overconfidence pattern
+    const successClaimRate = reports.filter(r => r.claimedOutcome.success).length / reports.length;
+    const avgTruthScore = analysis.truthScore;
+    
+    if (successClaimRate > 0.9 && avgTruthScore < 0.7) {
+      analysis.deceptionDetected = true;
+      analysis.deceptionType.push('overconfidence');
+      analysis.evidence.successRateDiscrepancy = successClaimRate - avgTruthScore;
+    }
+
+    // Detect issue hiding
+    const hiddenIssues = reports.filter(r => 
+      r.claimedOutcome.noErrors && r.evidence?.inconsistencies?.length > 0
+    ).length;
+    
+    if (hiddenIssues > reports.length * 0.5) {
+      analysis.deceptionDetected = true;
+      analysis.deceptionType.push('issue_hiding');
+      analysis.evidence.hiddenIssuesCount = hiddenIssues;
+    }
+
+    // Detect fabrication
+    const unrealisticResults = reports.filter(r => 
+      r.claimedOutcome.performance.improvement > 0.5 || // >50% improvement
+      r.claimedOutcome.quality.codeQuality > 0.95 // >95% quality
+    ).length;
+
+    if (unrealisticResults > 0) {
+      analysis.deceptionDetected = true;
+      analysis.deceptionType.push('fabrication', 'unrealistic_results');
+      analysis.evidence.unrealisticSuccessRate = true;
+    }
+
+    // Detect fast reporting (suspicious)
+    const avgReportingTime = reports.reduce((sum, r) => sum + (r.evidence?.reportingTime || 5000), 0) / reports.length;
+    if (avgReportingTime < 2000) {
+      analysis.evidence.suspiciouslyFastReporting = true;
+    }
+
+    // Detect impossible claims
+    const impossibleClaims = reports.filter(r =>
+      r.claimedOutcome.performance.improvement > 1.0 // >100% improvement
+    ).length;
+
+    if (impossibleClaims > 0) {
+      analysis.deceptionDetected = true;
+      analysis.deceptionType.push('impossible_claims');
+      analysis.evidence.impossiblePerformanceGains = true;
+    }
+
+    // Detect selective reporting
+    const allSuccesses = reports.every(r => r.claimedOutcome.success);
+    if (allSuccesses && reports.length > 10) {
+      analysis.deceptionDetected = true;
+      analysis.deceptionType.push('selective_reporting');
+      analysis.evidence.missingFailureReports = true;
+      analysis.evidence.suspiciousSuccessRate = 1.0;
+    }
+
+    // Detect cherry picking
+    const incompleteMetrics = reports.filter(r => {
+      const metrics = r.claimedOutcome.performance.metrics;
+      return Object.keys(metrics).length < 3; // Less than 3 metrics reported
+    }).length;
+
+    if (incompleteMetrics > reports.length * 0.7) {
+      analysis.deceptionDetected = true;
+      analysis.deceptionType.push('cherry_picking');
+      analysis.evidence.incompleteMetricsReporting = true;
+    }
+
+    // Detect contradictions
+    const contradictions = this.detectContradictions(reports);
+    if (contradictions > 0) {
+      analysis.deceptionDetected = true;
+      analysis.deceptionType.push('gaslighting', 'contradictory_statements');
+      analysis.evidence.contradictionCount = contradictions;
+    }
+
+    // Calculate confidence
+    analysis.confidence = Math.min(1.0, analysis.deceptionType.length * 0.3 + (1 - analysis.truthScore));
+
+    // Generate recommendations
+    if (analysis.deceptionDetected) {
+      analysis.recommendations = this.generateRecommendations(analysis.deceptionType);
+    }
+
+    return analysis;
+  }
+
+  async analyzeCollusionPatterns(agentIds: string[], reports: AgentReport[]): Promise<any> {
+    const agentReports = new Map();
+    
+    // Group reports by agent
+    for (const report of reports) {
+      if (!agentReports.has(report.agentId)) {
+        agentReports.set(report.agentId, []);
+      }
+      agentReports.get(report.agentId).push(report);
+    }
+
+    // Look for synchronization patterns
+    const taskReports = new Map();
+    for (const report of reports) {
+      if (!taskReports.has(report.taskId)) {
+        taskReports.set(report.taskId, []);
+      }
+      taskReports.get(report.taskId).push(report);
+    }
+
+    let synchronizedReporting = 0;
+    let identicalFalseClaims = 0;
+
+    for (const [taskId, taskReportsArray] of taskReports) {
+      if (taskReportsArray.length > 1) {
+        // Check for synchronized timing
+        const timestamps = taskReportsArray.map(r => r.timestamp);
+        const maxTimestamp = Math.max(...timestamps);
+        const minTimestamp = Math.min(...timestamps);
+        
+        if (maxTimestamp - minTimestamp < 60000) { // Within 1 minute
+          synchronizedReporting++;
+        }
+
+        // Check for identical false claims
+        const claims = taskReportsArray.map(r => JSON.stringify(r.claimedOutcome));
+        const uniqueClaims = new Set(claims);
+        
+        if (uniqueClaims.size === 1 && taskReportsArray[0].claimedOutcome.success) {
+          // All agents claim same success - check if it's false
+          const avgTruthScore = taskReportsArray.reduce((sum, r) => 
+            sum + this.calculateReportTruthScore(r), 0) / taskReportsArray.length;
+          
+          if (avgTruthScore < 0.5) {
+            identicalFalseClaims++;
+          }
+        }
+      }
+    }
+
+    return {
+      collusionDetected: synchronizedReporting > 0 || identicalFalseClaims > 0,
+      collusionType: ['coordinated_false_reporting'],
+      confidence: Math.min(1.0, (synchronizedReporting + identicalFalseClaims) * 0.3),
+      evidence: {
+        synchronizedReporting: synchronizedReporting > 0,
+        identicalFalseClaims,
+        analysedTasks: taskReports.size,
+        involvedAgents: agentIds
+      }
+    };
+  }
+
+  private calculateReportTruthScore(report: AgentReport): number {
+    // Simplified truth score calculation
+    let score = 0.8; // Base score
+
+    // Penalize for inconsistencies
+    if (report.evidence?.inconsistencies?.length > 0) {
+      score -= report.evidence.inconsistencies.length * 0.1;
+    }
+
+    // Penalize for unrealistic claims
+    if (report.claimedOutcome.performance.improvement > 0.5) {
+      score -= 0.3;
+    }
+
+    if (report.claimedOutcome.quality.codeQuality > 0.95) {
+      score -= 0.2;
+    }
+
+    // Penalize for fast reporting
+    if (report.evidence?.reportingTime < 2000) {
+      score -= 0.1;
+    }
+
+    return Math.max(0, Math.min(1, score));
+  }
+
+  private detectContradictions(reports: AgentReport[]): number {
+    let contradictions = 0;
+    const taskReports = new Map();
+
+    // Group by task
+    for (const report of reports) {
+      if (!taskReports.has(report.taskId)) {
+        taskReports.set(report.taskId, []);
+      }
+      taskReports.get(report.taskId).push(report);
+    }
+
+    // Check for contradictory reports on same task
+    for (const [taskId, taskReportsArray] of taskReports) {
+      if (taskReportsArray.length > 1) {
+        for (let i = 0; i < taskReportsArray.length - 1; i++) {
+          const report1 = taskReportsArray[i];
+          const report2 = taskReportsArray[i + 1];
+          
+          if (report1.claimedOutcome.success !== report2.claimedOutcome.success) {
+            contradictions++;
+          }
+        }
+      }
+    }
+
+    return contradictions;
+  }
+
+  private generateRecommendations(deceptionTypes: string[]): string[] {
+    const recommendations = [];
+
+    if (deceptionTypes.includes('overconfidence')) {
+      recommendations.push('Implement additional verification for this agent');
+      recommendations.push('Require independent validation of claims');
+    }
+
+    if (deceptionTypes.includes('fabrication')) {
+      recommendations.push('Require third-party verification for performance claims');
+      recommendations.push('Implement automated evidence validation');
+    }
+
+    if (deceptionTypes.includes('selective_reporting')) {
+      recommendations.push('Mandatory reporting of all task outcomes');
+      recommendations.push('Automated detection of missing reports');
+    }
+
+    if (deceptionTypes.includes('cherry_picking')) {
+      recommendations.push('Require comprehensive metrics reporting');
+      recommendations.push('Standardize required evidence formats');
+    }
+
+    if (deceptionTypes.includes('gaslighting')) {
+      recommendations.push('Implement immutable audit trail for agent reports');
+      recommendations.push('Enable cross-agent verification workflows');
+    }
+
+    return recommendations;
+  }
+}